Thursday, May 20, 2010

The folly of man’s planning

The folly of man’s planning 

By Julio Severo 
Modern Christian families have usually 2 children. Single women with three or four children fathered by different men are not a rare sight, at least not in Brazil. An unmarried man with several children by several women is a growing modern reality. That is the horrendous legacy of family planning. 
The preaching of family planning, initiated by lesbian theosophist Annie Besant in the predominantly Protestant England in the 19th century, achieved its objective: today’s England is much less Christian, and men and women are much less prone to get married. Of those getting married, the pattern is two children at the most. 
Margaret Sanger, inventor of the term “birth control” in the early 20th century, used to say that birth control would eventually destroy Christianity. Looking at England, nobody could doubt Sanger, founder of the International Planned Parenthood Federation, which is today the largest abortion organization in the world. 
As in England, the family-planning fever, launched by New Age leaders, spread as fire throughout Protestant nations. Next, ideas of racial purification (eugenics) and population control came in the same trail. German Nazis and the Soviet communists benefitted a lot from those ideas. 
If the goal of the population-control agenda was to indoctrinate families to have two children, the success was total, at least in Europe and in the US. But in the trail a shady picture appeared. 
With the divorce of sex from procreation, marriage came under contempt. With marriage despised, sexual freedom came, where a man is free to make sex to whoever he wants, with no marital responsibility. The result, as we have seen, is many and increasing cases of single women having several children fathered by different men. And equally bizarre cases of men that, as perverted hummingbirds pollinating throughout their world, live their lives impregnating a woman after another. 
I met a man that, when young and without God, lived unconcerned about marriage, just getting busy with pleasures, which yielded to him eight children by eight different women. Later, he accepted Jesus and became a minister. 
But there are cases of much younger men that may also brag that they have eight or more children with different women. These children, with several siblings, will never have a normal father’s love, while their fathers continue their insane contests for new women to impregnate.
At the end, a gigantic mass of illegitimate unborn babies, by different fathers and mothers, are aborted or get permission to be born. And the statistics for children born outside marriage and natural family are not beautiful: 70% delinquents come from these irresponsible relationships.
In past times, it took a lifetime for a depraved man to impregnate several women. Today, with sex much easier and free, young men can impregnate a variety of women in a shorter time, and the results are always several abortions or illegitimate children.
Instead of correcting the problem by valuing natural family and establishing punishments for irresponsible conducts, social engineers prefer to redefine family, removing its original sense of “father and mother married with children beget by them” to benefit any deformed grouping, regardless of marriage, composed of:  
* A cohabiting man and woman bringing up children from previous relationships. 
* A divorced man with a divorced woman bringing up children from previous marriages. 
* A man with another man bringing up children fathered by other people. 
Those deformed groups, which are extremely problematic, are included as “family” in sick cultures, and it is no wonder that governments say that “family” has “problems”. Probably, governments want intentionally the classification of those deformed groups as “family” in order to have full powers and excuses to interfere, mutilate, traumatize, damage, deform and destroy the power of the natural family. 
Instead of promoting the growth of the natural family, malicious and opportunistic governments promote the growth of deformed groups and their valorization as “family”. Instead of valuing an increase in births in natural families, irresponsible governments, with their population-control doctrine, eventually promote explosion of abortions and illegitimate births. 
The family-planning doctrine was able to reduce drastically the number of marriages in the Western nations. It was also able to reduce drastically the number of children in the increasingly fewer formal marriages today. But in the process it provoked the disarray of sexual relationships and unrestrained procreation by men and women that want nothing to do with marriage. 
The population-control doctrine, which is reducing marriages and families, is provoking an unprecedented explosion of fatherless and family-less children. As the number of marriages decreases, the number of illegitimate babies increases continuously.  
The abundant access to legal abortion in the Western nations has, for the time being, been able to varnish the enormity of their demographic woes, because a lot of women that were supposed to be with 8 or more children by different men are single and childless, continuing “normally” their careers and active sexual lives. The cost of the sexual freedom is an immense blood shedding that is impossible to measure. 
To men that don’t want to impregnate woman after woman, the only option left is anal (homosexual) sex and become other piece in the population-control game to destroy natural marriage, contributing for many of the gay demands for the disfigurement of the natural family. 
Sex, any sex, is promoted today, provided that it mutilates, traumatizes, damages, deforms or even destroys children, values, Christianity, marriage and family. It is not without purpose that the International Planned Parenthood Federation is engaged in the promotion of abortion, homosexuality, feminism and sexual education in the schools. 
The consequences are already here. And in the next decades, more consequences will come. Because of the reduced number of children, Europe is in process of being dominated by large Muslim families. But the European leaders’ most urgent questions in the next years are: with a population of young workers more and more reduced, how to support social security? What to do with the enormous number of seniors increasing continuously? Netherlands, formerly a strong Protestant nation, has given the official answer: euthanasia.
Netherlands, religiously faithful to the population-control doctrine, has been pioneering in homosexual “marriage”, children’s adoption by gay couples, legal acceptance of marijuana and other drugs, etc. Besides euthanasia, Netherlands has been exporting abortion to other nations, through her infamous abortion boat. And for the sake of diversity and demoncracy, Netherlands has the dishonor of having the first pedophilic party in the world, composed mostly of homosexual pedophiles.
Netherlands and other modern nations reflect the fulfillment of Margaret Sanger’s wish: birth control destroys Christian churches and their influence on society
That is the cost of the acceptance of the man’s planning. That is the cost of the rejection of the planning of God. 
To marry and have several children inside of marriage is folly, fools in this world say. But this is the “foolishness” of God. Not to marry and fill the earth with children’s blood or fill it with traumatized children without a father, without a family and without a moral direction: that is the man’s foolishness without God. That is the legacy of family planning.
Portuguese version of this article: A loucura do planejamento do homem

No comments:

Post a Comment