Luiz Mott saves Catholic Church from suffering mega pedophilia scandal
By Julio Severo
A seminarian left a Catholic seminar because he
thought it was not the ideal place for him. He ended up finding in Marxism most
of the answers for his sexual “needs.”
It is not easy for you to hide for a long time homosexuality
and pedophilia in an environment where there are Christian moral
restrictions.
But inside of Marxism and the movement
homosexual, you can leave the closet, and receive due protection, because
illusions and lies are a part of the homosexual and Marxist game.
So there are no daily pedophilia scandals
coming directly from the homosexual movement or from the Marxist movements. It
is as if there were no sexual threat to boys in their midst. It is as if these
movements were a paradise of sexual purity, the ideal place for babies and boys.
However, that is in no way the reality. In
2007, I exposed to Brazil in my blog Dr. Denilson Lopes, a Brazilian university
professor that published the article “Loving Boys: Pedophilia and the
Contemporary Intolerance” in a homosexual website. To see his full article in
Portuguese saved in my blog, follow this link: http://juliosevero.blogspot.com/2007/07/pedofilia-and-homossexualismo.html
After 3 years, no authority has taken any action.
But I wonder that if I had referred to the pedophilia advocate as “Father Denilson
Lopes”, in less than 3 days the national and international media, prosecutors,
federal police agents and a group of other creatures would appear in a hurry to
denounce “another scandal of pedophilia in the Catholic Church”, omitting the
obvious fact that, above all, Lopes is homosexual. By the way, Lopes is very
well sheltered and protected in the Marxist academic environment.
With university professors like Lopes and Mott,
who now will write the “Pedophilic Collective” to open the secrets of that
Marxist and homosexual closet?
Mott’s option for Marxism and the homosexual movement
was an issue of mere survival then.
However, on one side it would have been good if
he had become priest or bishop. Only this way his scandals would forcedly be
unlocked from the closet to the public by a media always ready to cover up pedophilia
inside of Marxism and in the movement homosexual, but that it never loses an
opportunity to denounce priests who abuse boys. But, of course, without never
mentioning their homosexuality, because it compromises fatally the homosexual movement.
For the leftist media, in that dirty game the
only immorally valid attitude is to compromise the Catholic Church and her stances
against abortion and homosexuality.
Certainty if Vatican embraced totally Marxism,
promoting abortion and officially ordaining
homosexual priests, bishops and cardinals, the pedophilia scandals
involving the Catholic Church would disappear mysteriously on the news media.
After all, friends protect friends.
If the Catholic Church made that official
change, the Marxist media would be forced to seek another scapegoat: conservative
evangelical churches. The show then would begin: daily scandals of pedophilia
of ministers and other leaders bursting wildly before the public.
The homosexual movement and the Marxist elite, which
control the mainstream press, know very well what they do when they “report”
cases of homosexual abuse of boys inside of the Catholic Church, using her as a
scapegoat of the consequences of the conduct that they so much stimulate at schools
and in society.
But a homosexual is a homosexual, whether in
the Catholic Church, in evangelical churches, in Marxism or in the movement
homosexual.
The vast majority of the pedophilia scandals in
the Catholic Church involves boys’ sexual abuses, that is, homosexual priests
abusing underage males.
But why to think that only inside of the
Catholic Church homosexuals commit sexual abuses against boys? Why to think
that in Marxism and in the homosexual movement they automatically become sexual
saints and protectors of children?
Around world, nobody today is seeking more the
children’s sexual liberation than homosexual groups. And, believe it or not, because
of their fight for children’s sexual “liberation” they are considered
children's advocates. In that sense, it seems that Luiz Mott just wants to be a
pioneer in Brazil of that noble “liberation.”
Even with those clear signs, see the special treatment
that the Marxist media would grant Mott, depending on his choice:
1. As a priest or bishop, Mott would be exposed
as a demon of pedophilia inside of the Catholic Church. The media would use him
to lead the public to understand that men’s sex with boys has everything to do
with the Catholic Church and her moral values, but absolutely anything to do
with homosexuality. He would be presented as a pedophilic scandal produced by
the Catholic Church. They would say, “What a hideous and criminal thing: Father
Mott involved in pedophilia!”
2. As a Marxist and leader of the Brazilian gay
movement, he is portrayed as an angel, having been awarded by former Brazilian
president Fernando Henrique Cardoso and by the current Brazilian president Lula
for having founded the Gay Group of Bahia, which wearisomely chatters that
Brazil is having a “homocaust”. Even with his pro-pedophilia declarations,
nobody in the mainstream press in Brazil calls him a “pedophilia scandal
produced by the homosexual movement”. In fact, they would say, “What a
beautiful thing: Dr. Luiz Mott, a professor in the Federal University of Bahia,
advocating the children’s sexual rights!”
While Mott stays in Marxism and in the homosexual
movement, he will be protected and enjoying all the kinds of privileges from
the press and the government. But woe to him if he wants to be a priest or
bishop. The media won’t forgive him.
Moral lesson? If one wants to hide his sexual
perversions, he should not do it in the Catholic Church and any other Christian
church. Marxism and the homosexual movements are the ideal closet to hide dirty
secrets.
How can the Catholic Church in Brazil face that
media dishonesty suported by the homosexual movement and Marxism?
By radically closing herself to the “liberation”
theology and by radically opening her up to the Holy Spirit and his gifts. When
Mott studied in a Catholic seminar, it was an excellent opportunity for him to
receive deliverance.
According to Mark 16, Jesus Christ’s follower
has the power and the authority to minister healing and deliverance for the
oppressed, and undeniably Mott entered the seminar oppressed by homosexuality.
But Catholic seminaries were infected by liberation theology and by a sickening
liberalism. Homosexuality is not an uncommon addiction among liberals, whether
Catholics or not.
To avoid boys’ sexual abuse, the Catholic
Church and all of the Christian churches should make a rigorous selection to hinder
closed homosexuals from being ordained. And they should get ready, under the
power and anointing of the Holy Spirit, to work with all those that enter in
their seminars with homosexual problems. In fact, that apostolic approach
should be rule for all those that enter in Christian churches.
The answer to prevail over the biased media,
the homosexual movement and the Marxist movements is the Holy Spirit. No power on
the earth, under the earth or in the spiritual spheres is mightier than the Holy
Spirit.
The Holy Spirit is also the answer for
homosexuals who, as Luiz Mott, enter in the seminar in search of spiritual
solutions, but they find only liberalism and more homosexuality. The Holy
Spirit delivers from the worst homosexual addictions, including sex with
boys.
Actually, by leaving the seminary, Mott saved
the Catholic Church from a mega scandal. But if somebody there had helped him
to know and experience the Holy Spirit, instead of saying today that
Christianity is oppressive, Mott would be testifying that he was delivered from
a big oppression.
Now, who will save him who saved the Catholic
Church?
Portuguese version of this
article: Luiz Mott livra Igreja
Católica de sofrer mega-escândalo de pedofilia
No comments:
Post a Comment