Friday, October 31, 2014

Obama: the “Savior” of the Brazilian Right


Obama: the “Savior” of the Brazilian Right

By Julio Severo
There is no doubt that Barack Obama is destroying America as her founders intended her to be. And with his politics of imposing the homosexual agenda through his State Department, he shows that he is capable of destroying other nations too.
All Christian conservative leaders I know denounce his destructive capabilities. And all of them agree that Obama is a socialist. So his destructive capabilities are basically socialist.
Even so, many, even Christians, have been mesmerized into seeing him as a “savior.” Progressive Christians in America see him in this way. And now even rightists in Brazil see him in the same light too.
Some of them put a petition in the White House website asking for help. They said: “We call a White House position in relation to communist expansion in Latin America. Brazil does not want and will not be a new Venezuela.”
They are asking the same White House that recently decided to betray Brazilian military men who saved Brazil from communism!
Yes, they asked the Obama White House to take a position. And if Brazil became a Venezuela, what would the U.S. do? They would merely buy Brazilian oil!
A 2006 article said: “The United States continues to be the top buyer of Venezuelan oil, bringing the South American country billions of dollars in earnings that help fund” the Foro de São Paulo and other communist efforts.
When communist dictator Hugo Chávez called George Bush a “devil,” how did the U.S. answer? By bringing more billions of dollars to communist Venezuela.
As a conservative, Bush had very good reasons to get rid of the Venezuelan communism. But he never did it.
I assume that Marxist Dilma Rousseff will never call Obama a “devil.” Both of them love the homosexual and abortion agenda. In fact, both have been great allies in the United Nations. If Brazil wants to promote sodomy in the U.N., the U.S. says “amen.” If America wants to promote abortion in the UN, Brazil says “amen.”
Their differences are merely economic: Brazil is in the BRICS and Obama does not want Brazil there. In other respects, Obama is destroying America in the American Marxist way and Rousseff is destroying Brazil in a mixed American-Cuban Marxist way.
Both anti-U.S. and pro-U.S. Brazilian Marxists love the U.S. gay and abortion agenda. But pro-U.S. Brazilian Marxists prefer only the American Marxism. Now even Brazilian rightists are saying: “If Brazil is to have communism, we want Obama and his communism!”
Now, Obama has become a savior for Brazilian rightists too!
We are living in incredible times!
As a Brazilian conservative, I have never supported Rousseff. And I wonder how a conservative could support Obama. Are they really conservative?
Some time ago, I told a Brazilian Pentecostal minister, who has the American citizenship, that the Obama administration has been funding Islamic terrorists who torture and slaughter Christians. He answered: “This is an anti-American lie. Since I came to America in the Obama administration, I have received excellent free healthcare and many other things. I have no complaint about Obama.”
So if the Obama administration supports Christian slaughters in the hands of Islamic terrorists around the world, who care? The important thing is that Obama is taking care of me!

Position yourself against the Bolivarian communist expansion in Brazil promoted by the administration of Dilma Rousseff

On 10/26, Dilma Rousseff was reelected, and will continue his party's plan to establish a communist regime in Brazil - the Bolivarian molds propounded by the Foro de São Paulo. We know that in the eyes of the international community, the election was fully democratic, but the ballot boxes used are not reliable, apart from the fact the heads of the judiciary, are mostly members of the winning party. Social policies also influenced the choice of the president, and people were threatened with losing their food allowance if they do not re-elect Dilma. We call a White House position in relation to communist expansion in Latin America. Brazil does not want and will not be a new Venezuela, and the USA that need help the promoters of democracy and freedom in Brazil.
My question to these Brazilian rightists is: How will Obama help to promote democracy and freedom in Brazil if he is taking them from America?
I do not know about American rightists, but Brazilian rightists are desperately crazy.
The only escape from Obama and Rousseff and their socialism is Jesus Christ.
Portuguese version of this article: Obama: o “salvador” da direita brasileira
Recommended Reading:



Position yourself against the Bolivarian communist expansion in Brazil promoted by the administration of Dilma Rousseff

On 10/26, Dilma Rousseff was reelected, and will continue his party's plan to establish a communist regime in Brazil - the Bolivarian molds propounded by the Foro de São Paulo. We know that in the eyes of the international community, the election was fully democratic, but the ballot boxes used are not reliable, apart from the fact the heads of the judiciary, are mostly members of the winning party. Social policies also influenced the choice of the president, and people were threatened with losing their food allowance if they do not re-elect Dilma. We call a White House position in relation to communist expansion in Latin America. Brazil does not want and will not be a new Venezuela, and the USA that need help the promoters of democracy and freedom in Brazil.

Wednesday, October 29, 2014

Beware of False Conservatives! Neocons and Their Leftist Mistreatment of Christians


Beware of False Conservatives! Neocons and Their Leftist Mistreatment of Christians

By Julio Severo
I received a report yesterday from Peter LaBarbera, one of the major Christian voices against the gay agenda in America, that he was detained by customs agents when he entered Canada. They did an intense search of his phone, laptop and belongings.
No, no. LaBarbera is not an Islamic terrorist. According to the Gaystapo and the politically-correct mob, he is worse: he is “homophobic” — a vague term that can be loosely interpreted to refer to criminals or merely Christians quoting Bible verses condemning homosexual sins.
The Canadian agents confiscated from LaBarbera a DVD copy of a new Russian documentary called “Sodom” as potential “hate propaganda” in violation of Canadian law banning material or people who could potentially “incite hate” based on “sexual orientation.”
“Sodom,” which features an interview with American pro-family leader Scott Lively of Defend the Family International, just shows the traditional Christian stance that homosexuality is a sexual perversion.
LaBarbera was entering Canada to attend his own trial in a court because his peaceful protest April 12 against abortion and sodomy at a Canadian public university was considered “hate.”
Ironically, the Canadian government that has mistreated LaBarbera is the conservative government of Stephen Harper, in power for many years. Canadian Christians had voted for him to avoid mistreatment by the Left against Christians who oppose abortion and sodomy, and now they suffer a leftist treatment in the hands of a conservative government.
“Conservative” Canada is becoming a dangerous place for pro-life and pro-family Christians. You can freely protest sodomy and abortion in Russia, but not in Canada.

LaBarbera’s Friend

I spent my day yesterday with an American friend of LaBarbera. He was the director of a Christian pro-family organization in a U.S. state.
Seeing the relentless advance of the homosexual agenda and its advocates, he was determined to fight it with no compromise.
But some well-funded “conservative” voices in his state thought that a compromise was vitally important: “since pro-family organizations could not allow homosexual ‘marriage,’ at least they should let homosexual activists have civil unions.” My friend correctly understood that civil unions were a significant stepping stone for higher claims, including homosexual “marriage.” So he resisted these voices, coming especially from groups connected to neocons.
Then came the battle between Barack Obama and Mitt Romney in the last U.S. presidential election. The same voices said, “Romney is the only conservative option to defeat Obama!” Conservative? My friend and other real conservatives knew that the first state to legalize homosexual “marriage” in the U.S. was Massachusetts, under Governor Mitt Romney, who became the first U.S. governor to pass a law turning sodomy into official marriage.

Satan and Beelzebub

Alan Keyes, a conservative Catholic, denounced, in an excellent WND article, that the choice between Obama and Romney was actually “A choice between Satan and Beelzebub.”
But neocons won. They said that it was non-sense not to support Romney. The priority, they said, was to defeat Obama.
My friend was removed from the headship of the pro-family organization because Christian conservatives were misled into choosing Beelzebub to defeat Satan… And while he mentioned to me the LaBarbera report on his detainment for “homophobia,” he told how powerful neocons are among conservatives in America.
Neocons have much more political power and money than most Christians who engage in pro-family battles just for defending their families. But neocons have “higher” interests, especially ultranationalistic interests at the expense of moral and Christian values.
What happens when Christian conservatives vote for the neocons’ conservatives? Just look at the “conservative” government of Canada and its leftist mistreatment of Peter LaBarbera.

“Conservatives” in the United Kingdom

In the United Kingdom, Christians also vote for conservatives to protect themselves from this leftist mistreatment. But what have they got?
The British government under David Cameron, of the Conservative Party, has passed a law transforming sodomy into official marriage.
First, the political “conservative” talk was: “let’s fight against homosexual ‘marriage,’ but at least let homosexual activists get civil unions.” Next: “Now, let them get homosexual ‘marriage’!” This is not conservative. This is neocon, or false conservative.
Now, according to WND, British homosexuals are suing to force churches to marry them! Everything began with a “conservative” government compromising, compromising and compromising.
The next talk will be: “homosexual ‘marriage’ is not important. Conservatives should focus on more important subjects.” Important for neocons, of course.
Both Canada and the United Kingdom are major references for our understanding that to vote for conservatives (or false conservatives) is not a solution. It may become another serious problem.

Neocons and Christian Persecution

The British “conservative” government follows neocon interests, not conservative interests. According to Murad Makhmudov and Lee Jay Walker, Christian persecution follows neocon ambitions, which have inflamed torture and murder of Christians in Kosovo, Libya, Iraq, Syria and other nations. They point that the U.S. and the United Kingdom are the main tools for facilitating the neocons’ Christian persecution.
So neocons are capable of misleading conservative Christians into choosing their “conservative” candidates. Next, they are equally capable of imposing leftist mistreatment of Christians in their countries while at the same time stimulating torture and murder of Christians abroad.
Even so, neocons have been hijacking conservative feelings everywhere, misleading their victims that their candidates are better than their enemies.
In the recent Brazilian presidential election, U.S. neocons were actively engaged, as I told in my article “Obama Strategist in the Brazilian Presidential Campaign.” Their candidate was pro-gay agenda, but Brazilian conservatives were misled to think: “The homosexual agenda should not be important now.” The important thing was to defeat neocons’ enemies.
In this case, as many Brazilians told me, if Obama was with neocons, he is a hero!
I do not understand why neocons are called new conservatives, because they are willing to support any cause, conservative or leftist, that advances the U.S. supremacy.
Alan Keyes is right. Leftist candidates do not deserve our support. And definitely neocons’ candidates do not deserve it too.

Jesus and the Wicked Rulers

For a real conservative Christian, there is another point. When only the wicked rule, Christians should focus their attention only on spiritual priorities: the preaching of the Gospel and the salvation of sinners.
When the Roman Empire dominated Israel, Jesus never instigated his disciples about political issues. Of course, if there is a candidate who is not anti-family, we are free to support him. But political ambitions were never Jesus’ priority or concern. He was never obsessed about supporting a wicked ruler against another wicked ruler. In fact, he never instigated his disciples in these obsessions.
When political strategists manipulate conservatives, I think in LaBarbera being detained by a conservative government for his Christian stance against abortion and homosexuality. I think in my American friend being removed from the headship of a pro-family organization because well-funded neocons think that the supremacy of the U.S. politics should take a precedence over pro-family issues too. I think in British churches being sued to marry homosexuals. And I think in Christians in Syria and Iraq being beheaded because of the U.S. and U.K. neocon funding to the Islamic cutthroats.
By this point, we should have learnt something from Jesus’ example and the neocons’ deception.
Recommended Reading:

Saturday, October 25, 2014

Obama Strategist in the Brazilian Presidential Campaign


Obama Strategist in the Brazilian Presidential Campaign

By Julio Severo
The 2014 Brazilian presidential campaign had the involvement of an important campaign strategist of the president of United States, Barack Obama: David Axelrod. According to the Brazilian daily Folha de São Paulo, Axelrod had been hired to help build Aécio Neves candidacy.

Obama and David Axelrod
The idea of Americans strategists working on Brazilian election campaigns is nothing new. During the 2010 election, Ben Self, who worked on the Obama campaign, was hired as a consultant for current president Dilma Rousseff.
The unusual thing about David Axelrod’s involvement in the Aécio Neves campaign is that he is a major player in the US Democratic Party.
According to WND, Axelrod was mentored by an American communist. WND also says, “More than any other figure, David Axelrod made Barack Obama president… The Obama persona was in large part Ax’s carving.”
According to Ann Coulter, Axelrod was known for destroying men who denounced Obama.
Axelrod made Obama president — the most pro-abortion and pro-sodomy president in the U.S. history.
Considering that president Dilma Rousseff is as abortionist and homosexualist as Obama is, what is then the main interest of the main Obama strategist in helping Rousseff’s opponent?
In the past, Obama has openly praised Rousseff and his antecessor, Luiz “Lula” da Silva, even though Rousseff and Lula are anti-U.S. socialists. Both Brazilian presidents are aligned with the abortion and homosexualist agenda of the U.S. government, especially in the UN system. Their relationship has been strained only over economic issues that could jeopartidze the U.S. economic hegemony.
Axelrod was brought to Brazil with the help of former President Fernando Henrique Cardoso, also known by his initials FHC — who is close to former US President Bill Clinton. FHC founded PDSB, the Social Democrat Party, whose presidential candidate is Aécio Neves.
The presidential platform of Neves is as homosexualist as the platform of Rousseff is. And Neve’s vice, Aloísio Nunes, is as pro-abortion as Rousseff is. For me, there is no false hope that Neves could discontinue the homosexualist politics of Rousseff.
Even so, both FHC and Neves are misidentified as “conservatives” by the U.S. media.
Desperate by the abortion and homosexualist politics of Rousseff, many Christians in Brazil want to vote for Neves. But if the American socialist strategist who made Obama president is also successful in making Aécio Neves president, will he also the most pro-abortion and pro-sodomy president in the Brazilian history?
I do not know. But I know that Neves is the candidate of the socialist strategist of the most pro-abortion and pro-sodomy president in the U.S. history!
So I have no false hope on Neves to oppose anti-life and anti-family agendas. I have no hope that Neves will oppose the homosexualist agenda that the Obama administration has been imposing on the nations.
As a pro-family writer, I have to be honest about the two socialist (anti-U.S. and pro-U.S) candidates running for the Brazilian presidency. In fact, two days ago, in the height of this political campaign, my blog was shut down by Google after I published my article attacking the homosexualist platform of both candidates. Under pressure, Google restored my blog in 24 hours.
To understand Aécio Neves and his connections to the Obama administration, I have invited for an interview Wayne Madsen, an American investigative journalist whose work has appeared in my favorite website, WorldNetDaily. I do not agree with Madsen in many things, but I think that he is correct in some points. Read the interview:
Julio Severo: For 12 years, Brazil has had today a socialist party (Workers’ Party) ruling. In many respects, this ruling party is also aligned to the abortion and homosexual agenda of America. Why do neocons accept a Brazilian alignment with this agenda, but not with Cuba and Venezuela?
Wayne Madsen: George Soros is the bank roller of FEMEN and Pussy Riot, which have carried out attacks on churches in Russia and throughout Europe. Soros and his gang, which have an alliance with such neocons to force the world to beg to a powerful cabal of Wall Street/City of London gangsters — the Rothschilds included — for all goods and services, are the real enemies of the people. They wish to place their man Neves and his finance adviser Arminio Fraga Neto, a former Soros Quantum Fund executive, in charge in Brasilia.
Julio Severo: Most of the Brazilian conservatives are willing to vote for any candidate just to get rid of socialist Rousseff. What do you think about it?
Wayne Madsen: If they vote for Neves, Brazilians will get a Soros-influenced government that will first sell off Brazilian state assets for pennies to the dollar.
Julio Severo: Neves’ government platform follows the homosexualist items of the current Rousseff administration. There is no difference. The difference in other respects is: Rousseff is involved with very bad guys in Cuba and Venezuela. In contrast, Aécio wants nominated for his possible future administration people connected to George Soros. He has also connections to U.S. neocons. Could you tell us the knowledge you have about it?
Wayne Madsen: Neves's foreign policy adviser, Rubens Antônio Barbosa is a die-hard neocon who will withdraw Brazil from BRICS. US neo con diplomats at the US embassy in Brasilia and the Consulate General in Rio have been actively assisting the Neves campaign in order to get “their boy” in power.
Julio Severo: The book “The Next Decade: What the World Will Look Like,” by George Friedman (of Stratfor), has an interesting chapter saying that Brazil could represent the next threat to the U.S. economic supremacy, and it suggests that the U.S. strategy to hamper the Brazil expansion would be to strengthen Brazil’s neighbors, especially Argentina. Essentially, the U.S. would treat Brazil in the next decades as it treats today Russia, but not because the U.S. wants to hinder some Brazilian communism. The reason is to hinder Brazil from becoming an economic rival to the U.S. What do you think about it?
Wayne Madsen: If Brazil becomes a major economic power, America should just accept that and stop thinking of itself as a neo-Roman Empire. If Washington wants to continue down the path of neo-Romanism with a fascist flair, the US will collapse as fast as did the Roman Empire.
Recommended Reading:

Friday, October 24, 2014

After Pressure, Google Restores Blog Julio Severo in Portuguese


After Pressure, Google Restores Blog Julio Severo in Portuguese

By Julio Severo
With no explanation or notification, Google made my blog in Portuguese (http://juliosevero.blogspot.com/) disappear in the first minutes of Thursday, October 23.
After 24 hours of pressure from international readers, with no notification, Google made my blog reappear.
People in Brazil and other nations began to question Google in social networks and also by contacting the company: “Why to suspend Blog Julio Severo in Portuguese on the height of the Brazilian presidential elections in the exact time Severo published an article instructing the Brazilian public that both candidates support the gay agenda?”
One of the many pressures came from Rev. Alberto Thieme, who contacted Google headquarters and Google in Brazil.
Ultimately, the company explained to him that probably my blog “was found to violate Blogger’s policies.” What violation? No explanation.
Hours later, with no explanation, Google restored my blog.

International Pressure

The only explanation is massive pressure. Even in Italy people protested the Google censorship against my blog, in an Italian article entitled “Google censura un sito prolife: siamo in campagna elettorale!” (Google censors pro-life website in the height of the electoral campaign!)
Rev. Michael S. Heath, Helping Hands Ministry, U.S., commented to my blog:
“This morning I read Newsweek magazine's excerpt from Julian Assange’s new book, ‘When Google Met Wikileaks.’ The article concludes, ‘If the future of the Internet is to be Google, that should be of serious concern to people all over the world—in Latin America, East and Southeast Asia, the Indian subcontinent, the Middle East, sub-Saharan Africa, the former Soviet Union and even in Europe—for whom the Internet embodies the promise of an alternative to U.S. cultural, economic, and strategic hegemony.  A “don’t be evil” empire is still an empire.’ While Google’s decision to shut Julio’s blog yesterday suggests that the empire’s Force may indeed be evil, it is most certainly gay. Other than responding to complaints from sodomites why would Google have had any interest in turning off the blog?  Julio is an honest broker of information critical of America’s global effort to normalize sodomy.  I suspect his blog would be ignored by America’s force-channeling Yodas at Google, were it not for his relentless patriotic defense of family, faith and freedom.”
The last time my blog was shut down was in 2007, when many people, including philosopher Olavo de Carvalho and a federal prosecutor, took action, Olavo denouncing, and the prosecutor getting in contact with Google. In that time, Google told the prosecutor that my blog promoted hate and discrimination against homosexual activists. He answered them that he had never seen any of it in my articles. Before this Brazilian official, Google gave way and restored my blog to me.
In 2008, under pressure from homosexual groups, Brazilian federal prosecutors requested Google to shut down my blog for “homophobia.” Google’s official answer was that because Brazil has no anti-“homophobia,” they could not block my blog. Only after such law is passed, Google will be free to comply and definitively shut it down. (I had access to the exchange between Google and federal prosecutors through a Brazilian attorney.)

People vs. Big Government and Big Business

Of course, Google prefers to side with the gay agenda. But even with all is power, money and influence, it knows that most people reject homosexuality. A leftist polling institute in Brazil found five years ago that “99% of Brazilian citizens were ‘homophobic,’ and therefore should be reeducated.”
Conversely, perhaps 99% of the Brazilian socialist government and Google are homosexualist.
So the “homophobia” issue is People versus Big Government and Big Business.
I have successfully resisted, for years, Big Government and its steamroller against Christians who oppose homosexual perversions and dictatorship.
But the homosexualist steamroller from Big Business poses another big threat. In 2011, PayPal closed my account definitively, after an international campaign by AllOut, a U.S. homosexualist organization intent on persecuting Christians. In a communication to AllOut, PayPal explained that they closed my account because “We take very seriously any cases where a user has incited hatred, violence or intolerance because of a person’s sexual orientation”.
Now, I can no longer receive donations from my international friends through PayPal.
In a listing of the top ten anti-Christian acts in 2011, the Christian Anti-Defamation Commission ranked the gay pressure on PayPal as fourth top anti-Christian act, as reported by Charisma magazine.
Covering my case, WorldNetDaily run the headline: “PayPal blacklists Christian writer.”

Google and Free Speech

About the hard times of my blog in Google, I began to use its service in 2005, because Google had chosen freely to offer to the international public a free speech platform. So I do not need to respect Google’s homosexual views and Google does not need to respect my Christian views. But Google needs to respect its own free speech advocacy.
If Google thinks that free speech is a threat to the homosexual agenda, it should ban free speech and be honest to the international community: “Our Blogspot service is available only to the supporters of the gay agenda.”
Google services should be clear: “We do not accept Christian users from Brazil, U.S., Russia, Uganda, etc.”
It is known that many of my articles do not please everybody — especially socialists, pro-abortion and pro-homosexuality activists and other antifamily militants. But freedom for dissenting voices is a part of democracy.

Voting Freedom

My latest Portuguese article, which had supposedly provoked the shutdown of my blog, was about the Brazilian presidential elections that will happen next Sunday. I have supported no candidate, because they promote the gay agenda, viewed by Christians as anti-family.
Even in this inflamed season of Brazilian elections, I have a right to speak out against the two candidates, and this right should not be violated for the benefit of the parties and candidates who were criticized with adequate civility.
Many Brazilians have chosen to vote for Dilma Rousseff (an anti-U.S. socialist, but only in economic, not moral, aspects) or Aécio Neves (a pro-U.S. socialist in everything, both economically and morally), but both are radically pro-gay agenda.
While Brazilians, who are obliged to vote by Brazilian antidemocratic laws, will make their political choices based only on economy, I have made my choice not to vote, based on the intent by both candidates to disfigure, for the benefit of the gay agenda, family, which is, before the State, the first institution established by God. Therefore, family has precedence and absolute priority over the State and economy. It is based on this absolute priority that I reject both Brazilian candidates.
Portuguese version of this article: Depois de pressão, Google restaura Blog Julio Severo
Another article about the Brazilian election:

Thursday, October 23, 2014

Blog Julio Severo in Portuguese arbitrarily shut down by Google in Brazil


Blog Julio Severo in Portuguese arbitrarily shut down by Google in Brazil

By Julio Severo
In the first minutes of Thursday, October 23, Blog Julio Severo, established by me, Julio Severo, in 2005 to reach Brazilians with information usually unavailable to them, disappeared from the Internet, with no hacking attack involved. All that was evident, from my careful verification, is that such disappearing was provoked and decided by the owner of the Blogspot service, Google, which freely offers to the international public a free speech platform.
The traditional address of my Portuguese blog is: http://juliosevero.blogspot.com/
The address is now completely off-line, with no approval from me or communication from Google. I have never been notified about some alleged violent or pornographic post that might have caused Google to suspend my blog for supposedly violating its policies. Now, only my blogs in other languages, including English, continue active.
So I ask the public to get in contact with Google to reestablish my Portuguese blog, which has a history of about ten years in Brazil.
It is known that many of my articles do not please everybody — especially socialists, pro-abortion and pro-homosexuality activists and other antifamily militants. But freedom for dissenting voices is part of democracy.
My latest Portuguese article, which may supposedly have provoked the shutdown of my blog, was about the Brazilian presidential elections that will happen next Sunday. I have supported no candidate, because they promote the gay agenda, viewed by Christians as anti-family.
Even in this inflamed season of Brazilian elections, I have a right to speak out against the two candidates, and this right should not be violated for the benefit of the parties and candidates who were criticized with adequate civility.
Many Brazilians have chosen to vote for Dilma Rousseff (an anti-U.S. socialist, but only in economic, not moral, aspects) or Aécio Neves (a pro-U.S. socialist in everything, both economically and morally), but both are radically pro-gay agenda.
While Brazilians, who are obliged to vote by Brazilian antidemocratic laws, will make their political choices based only on economy, I have made my choice not to vote, based on the intent by both candidates to disfigure, for the benefit of the gay agenda, family, which is, before the State, the first institution established by God. Therefore, family has precedence and absolute priority over the State and economy. It is based on this absolute priority that I reject both Brazilian candidates.
The Brazilian presidential election will happen next Sunday, and the voice of my blog, which offered a glimpse of information in the thick darkness of the Brazilian antifamily politics, has been silenced by force, leaving the Brazilian public with no access to a Christian viewpoint that does not support any of the anti-U.S. and pro-U.S. pro-sodomy candidates.
The last time my blog was shut down was in 2007, when many people, including philosopher Olavo de Carvalho and a federal prosecutor, took action, Olavo denouncing, and the prosecutor getting in contact with Google. In that time, Google told the prosecutor that my blog promoted hate and discrimination against homosexual activists. He answered them that he had never seen any of it in my articles. Before this Brazilian official, Google gave way and returned my blog to me.

How could you help now?

1. Spread this alert.
2. Get in contact with Google. Here is its contact address:
Google Inc.
1600 Amphitheatre Parkway
Mountain View, CA 94043
USA
Phone: +1 650 253 0000
Fax: +1 650 253 0001


http://www.google.com/intl/en-US/contact/
3. Let the public know about the violation of the free speech rights of Julio Severo.
4. Get in touch with officials who could intervene.
Today, it is my right being arbitrarily violated. Tomorrow, others’ rights, including yours.
I ask your involvement so that I may, as I have always done, keep supplying, with no charge, the Brazilian public with information that is mostly unavailable in Portuguese.
If you have suggestions or assistance, here is my contact email: juliosevero@outlook.com
Another article about the Brazilian election:

Monday, October 20, 2014

Christian Persecution Follows US, UK and France in Kosovo, Libya, Iraq and Syria


Christian Persecution Follows US, UK and France in Kosovo, Libya, Iraq and Syria

Murad Makhmudov and Lee Jay Walker
Modern Tokyo Times
Recent interventions by America, France and the United Kingdom equates to Christian persecution and enormous instability. This reality would appear to be a constant Western policy because the same scenario keeps on happening. Of course, in terms of numbers then Muslims have been killed in vast numbers based on sectarianism and political motives. However, for minority Christian communities in Kosovo, Libya, Iraq and Syria it is clear that Western meddling is creating a nightmare for Christians.
Indeed, it is ironic that in Syria it is the mainly Muslim members of the armed forces that are protecting Christians from brutal Takfiri sectarians, Islamist terrorist groups and an array of mercenaries. Like usual, these brutal forces in Syria are being supported by America, France and the United Kingdom based on Gulf petrodollars and the intrigues of Turkey. Therefore, even when opposition terrorist and sectarian forces kidnap Christian nuns, attack churches and threaten to cleanse the Christian minority this doesn’t worry America, France and the United Kingdom. Instead, these three Western powers just prepare more spin and hide behind language. Yet all three nations know what happened in Kosovo, Libya and Iraq.
The latest massacre against Christians happened in Libya whereby seven Egyptian Christians have been executed by suspected Islamists. Of course, during the rule of Colonel Gaddafi in Libya the Christian community wasn’t singled out. However, Western and Gulf powers utilized terrorists and mercenaries in order to defeat Gaddafi in Libya therefore not surprisingly today this nation faces growing Islamist militancy.
In Kosovo after the ending of this conflict it is clear that many Orthodox Christian have been killed, churches destroyed and many Christian areas have been written off the map. Indeed, even today Orthodox Christians can’t fully travel around Kosovo because of the fear of being attacked. Also, many ancient Orthodox Christian monuments have been destroyed and now the indigenous Orthodox Christian community resides in ghettoes in Kosovo.
In Iraq it is clear that Saddam Hussein was both anti-Shia and anti-Kurd but Christians did not face persecution under his watch. Yet when Iraq was invaded then soon this would be followed by sectarianism, terrorism and anti-Christian attacks. This reality led to the majority of Christians fleeing their homeland because at no time were the various Christian communities deemed to be worthy of being protected by Western troops. Instead, just like the Orthodox Christians of Kosovo, the Christians of Iraq would soon be in disarray after being abandoned by allied forces based on the political whims of Western political elites in America and the United Kingdom.
The government of Syria is now fighting for its survival therefore the various Christian communities fear another Iraq.  At the moment, Christians can still worship freely in Syrian government controlled areas. Yet, in areas under various terrorist and Takfiri groups, it is clear that Christians are being pressured to convert to Islam, cleansed, murdered and other barbaric realities. Despite this, political elites in America, France and the United Kingdom are supporting feudal Gulf nations and the whims of Turkey. Therefore, the survival of Christianity currently depends on the government of Syria because clearly the majority of Christians will flee if Western and Gulf sectarian backed terrorists win.
In Libya the recent brutal execution of seven Egyptian Christians is following the same pattern.  Fox News in January 2014 says: “Libya’s Coptic Christians, who number about 300,000, or 5 percent of the population, were allowed to practice their faith under dictator Muammar Qaddafi. But since the strongman was ousted from power, and ultimately killed, Muslim fundamentalists have increasingly filled the power void. Last month, the national assembly voted in favor of making Koranic law, or Shariah, the basis of all legislative decisions, meaning Islam will shape all future banking, criminal and financial cases.”
Further down in the same article Fox News says: “The emerging political and legal system’s orientation, combined with the rise of militants in the oil-rich nation, has left Christians feeling like the promise of democracy in the wake of Qaddafi’s fall has been broken.”
The massacre of Egyptian Christians in Libya sums up the usual realities following on from the meddling of America, France and the United Kingdom. Can this reality in Kosovo, Iraq, Libya and Syria be a coincidence — or, does it mean that an anti-Christian agenda is at the heart of major Western powers? The East Timorese witnessed the same reality just like the Biafrans in Nigeria. Likewise, today Papuans in West Papua face Islamization and Javanization in Indonesia but Western powers care little. It would appear that Christians are expendable when it comes to geopolitical concerns and appeasing the anti-Christian and anti-Shia state of Saudi Arabia.
Orthodox Christians fear to walk openly in Kosovo despite this land being the cradle of Serbian Orthodox Christianity. Likewise, Christians fear to walk in Libya, Iraq and Syria because of the meddling of Western powers.
Recommended Reading: