Wednesday, January 22, 2020

President Donald Trump Proclaims January 22nd “National Sanctity of Human Life Day”


President Donald Trump Proclaims January 22nd “National Sanctity of Human Life Day”

By Julio Severo
Since abortion was legalized in the United States in 1973, U.S. presidents have followed a long tradition where left-wing presidents praise abortion and right-wing presidents praise life.
Right-wing presidents proclaim January 22nd “National Sanctity of Human Life Day,” just as U.S. president Donald Trump did in 2020. The first president to make such proclamation was Ronald Reagan in 1984. This proclamation was continued under George H.W. Bush and George W. Bush, and it was discontinued under Bill Clinton and Barack Hussein Obama.
Trump has resumed it.
Even though Trump has celebrated the decline in the number and rate of abortions in the United States, most of this decline does not seem to stem exclusively from pro-life efforts. Less and less U.S. women are having babies. Even the CDC recognizes that the U.S. birthrate is in record slump. In fact, the U.S. is facing its lowest birthrate in its history, meaning that there are less births and, consequently, less abortions.
The main cause of the low birthrate in the U.S. is contraception, supported by a contraceptive mindset that always leads to abortion. So if Americans can celebrate abortion diminishing, how to have a true celebration when the births of American babies are in record slump?
Abortion was legalized right under the administration of Republican president Richard Nixon.
People in other nations could argue, “But such events affect just the U.S., not the world.” Immediately after the legalization of abortion in the U.S., the CIA, the State Department and USAID under a Republican administration produced NSSM 200, outlining strategies for the U.S. government to reduce the world population mainly through contraception.
Under NSSM 200, the U.S. government worked to reduce the population of several nations, and one of the main nations marked was Brazil, which today is facing a birth decline — just as NSSM 200 planned. Cannot the U.S. under Trump revert what a Republican administration began?
Trump should work not only to end abortion, but also end and revert the population control policies of the U.S. government, since the 1970s.
It would be so important if Trump became the first U.S. president to recognize the evils of contraception in the U.S. society and in the world and encouraged people to value large families. Yet, his willingness to continue the tradition of Reagan by recognizing the “National Sanctity of Human Life Day” is very important too.
Below is the full text of President Trump’s Proclamation:
Every person — the born and unborn, the poor, the downcast, the disabled, the infirm, and the elderly — has inherent value.  Although each journey is different, no life is without worth or is inconsequential; the rights of all people must be defended.  On National Sanctity of Human Life Day, our Nation proudly and strongly reaffirms our commitment to protect the precious gift of life at every stage, from conception to natural death.
Recently, we have seen decreases in the total number and rate of abortions in our country.  From 2007-2016, the most recent period of analysis, the number and rate of abortions decreased by 24 percent and 26 percent, respectively.  The rate of teen pregnancies — the vast majority of which are unplanned — has almost continuously decreased over the last quarter century, contributing to the lowest rate of abortions among adolescents since the legalization of abortion in 1973.  All Americans should celebrate this decline in the number and rate of abortions, which represents lives saved.  Still, there is more to be done, and, as President, I will continue to fight to protect the lives of the unborn.  I signed into law legislation under the Congressional Review Act that allows States and other grantees to exclude organizations that perform abortions from their Title X projects.  My Administration has also issued regulations to ensure Title X family planning projects are clearly separated from those that perform, promote, or refer for abortion as a method of family planning; to protect the conscience rights of healthcare workers and organizations, including with respect to abortion; and to ensure the Federal Government does not force employers that object, based on religious belief or moral conviction, to provide insurance for contraceptives, including those they believe cause early abortions.  Additionally, I have called on the Congress to act to prohibit abortions of later-term babies who can feel pain.
My Administration is also building an international coalition to dispel the concept of abortion as a fundamental human right.  So far, 24 nations representing more than a billion people have joined this important cause.  We oppose any projects that attempt to assert a global right to taxpayer‑funded abortion on demand, up to the moment of delivery.  And we will never tire of defending innocent life — at home or abroad.
As a Nation, we must remain steadfastly dedicated to the profound truth that all life is a gift from God, who endows every person with immeasurable worth and potential.  Countless Americans are tireless defenders of life and champions for the vulnerable among us.  We are grateful for those who support women experiencing unexpected pregnancies, those who provide healing to women who have had abortions, and those who welcome children into their homes through foster care and adoption.  On National Sanctity of Human Life Day, we celebrate the wonderful gift of life and renew our resolve to build a culture where life is always revered.
NOW, THEREFORE, I, DONALD J. TRUMP, President of the United States of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution and the laws of the United States, do hereby proclaim January 22, 2020, as National Sanctity of Human Life Day.  Today, I call on the Congress to join me in protecting and defending the dignity of every human life, including those not yet born.  I call on the American people to continue to care for women in unexpected pregnancies and to support adoption and foster care in a more meaningful way, so every child can have a loving home.  And finally, I ask every citizen of this great Nation to listen to the sound of silence caused by a generation lost to us, and then to raise their voices for all affected by abortion, both seen and unseen.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this twenty-first day of January, in the year of our Lord two thousand twenty, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and forty-fourth.
DONALD J. TRUMP
With information from LifeNews.
Recommended Reading:

Tuesday, January 21, 2020

Batwoman Becomes Batlesbian: How Superheros Are Used in the LGBTQ Propaganda Machine to Normalize Sodomy to Teenagers


Batwoman Becomes Batlesbian: How Superheros Are Used in the LGBTQ Propaganda Machine to Normalize Sodomy to Teenagers

By Julio Severo
The LGBTQ Gestapo treats as a “crime” any sign of a man renouncing homosexuality, but LGBTQ activism does whatever it wants to whoever it wants. LGBTQ activism has used beloved superhero characters which many Americans grew up reading about in comic books to propagandize a lifestyle contrary to biological sex.
On January 19, 2020, the episode of the CW’s Batwoman television series, Batwoman, represented by actress Ruby Rose, announced to the world what gay propagandists call “sexual orientation” — she’s now Batlesbian.
For those that don’t follow the Batman universe, Batwoman is really Kat Kane, the cousin of Bruce Wayne, whose alter ego is Batman.
Batwoman tells a teenager about herself after hearing about the teen’s parents refusing to accept her homosexuality. Actually, this was sheer propaganda to encourage teenagers confused about their biological sexuality. Normally, when teenagers are confused about drugs, parents and other wise adults encourage them to shun drugs.
Homosexuality is not less addictive and destructive than drugs. The way to help teenagers to avoid addictive and destructive behaviors is to encourage them by law and propaganda. On December 2019 President Donald Trump raised the legal smoking age from 18 to 21 for both cigarettes and vapes to protect young people of the evils of smoking.
While no similar measure is launched to protect young people, gay exploiters and predators will keep using their strategies to transform everything in LGBTQ to influence and impact teenagers. They will not stop. Just like Big Tobacco, their propaganda should be stopped.
The Batwoman series debuted in October 2019 on the CW and was promoted as the first superhero series in television history to feature an avowed LGBTQ character as the central character.
They will not stop launching and transforming traditional superhero characters into LGBTQ propagandists until they are stopped in their tracks.
If Russia was able to ban homosexual propaganda to children and teenagers, why cannot the U.S. follow this good example to protect American children and teenagers?
With information from Charisma.
Recommended Reading:

Sunday, January 19, 2020

Saudi Impunity on American Soil: FBI finds Saudi Arabia helps its citizens escape the U.S. after serious crimes while U.S. officials look the other way


Saudi Impunity on American Soil: FBI finds Saudi Arabia helps its citizens escape the U.S. after serious crimes while U.S. officials look the other way

By Julio Severo
A new report from the FBI has revealed that the Islamic dictatorship of Saudi Arabia “almost certainly” helps its citizens escape prosecution for serious crimes they are charged with in the U.S., and American officials have looked the other way for years.
“(Saudi) officials are unlikely to alter this practice in the near term unless the US Government (USG) directly addresses this issue with (Saudi Arabia) and ties US cooperation on (Saudi) priorities to ceasing this activity,” according to the FBI.
It is the first time a federal law enforcement agency acknowledged the “secret” practice of Saudi Arabia.
To make things worse, if a Saudi who committed a crime in the U.S. escapes to Saudi Arabia there is no chance for justice. While allies, the U.S. and Saudi Arabia do not have an extradition treaty, making it difficult and unlikely that a Saudi citizen charged with a crime in the U.S. would be released without diplomatic or political pressure.
Among cases of Saudi Arabia helping its citizens to escape the U.S. justice is a Saudi student wanted for killing a 15-year-old girl in Oregon almost four years ago.
Abdulrahman Sameer Noorah, 21, was due to stand trial in Portland in June 2017, but vanished nine days before the start date.
He was on bail on a single count of manslaughter for allegedly killing Fallon Smart by running her over as she crossed the road on August 19, 2016.
Noorah, who was studying on a scholarship at Portland Community College, was driving on a suspended license at the time.
Despite Fallon’s families’ pleas to deny him bail, it was set at $1million and a tenth, $100,000, was paid by the Saudi Arabian embassy in Los Angeles, triggering his release.
The conditions of his release stated that he had to remain under house arrest. As part of his bail conditions, Noorah was forced to surrender his passport.
Nine days before his trial was due to start, however, police discovered that the electronic ankle bracelet he was forced to wear had been removed and were unable to find him.
He was then later believed to have fled on a private jet with the help of his country’s consulate. He vanished after being picked up from his college campus in a black SUV.
U.S. authorities suspect Noorah used an illicit passport to escape to Saudi Arabia on a private jet provided by the Saudi consulate.
Saudi officials confirmed to U.S. authorities that Noorah had returned to Saudi Arabia seven days after he went missing.
Officials with the U.S. Department of Homeland Security and US Marshals Service are certain the Saudi government was involved in Noorah’s escape.
An investigation by The Oregonian revealed that four other Saudi students, who were studying in Oregon and facing similar circumstances to Noorah, had also fled the U.S. in recent years.
All were young men studying at one of Oregon’s public colleges or universities with assistance from Saudi Arabia.
Waleed Ali Alharthi, who was an Oregon State University student, was found allegedly in possession of child porn in April of 2015.
Police said they found pornographic videos on his laptop involving children. He was arrested and booked on 10 counts of encouraging child sex abuse.
The consulate also put up the security deposit for his $500,000 bail. Later, he fled. He was flown from Mexico City to Paris to Saudi Arabia.
In a similar case a few years prior, Abdulaziz Al Duways was arrested in December 2014 over the rape of a female classmate at Western Oregon University.
He was charged with rape and held on a $500,000 bond. Days later, a Saudi consulate official paid his bond and Al Duways vanished before he faced court.
In 2012, Oregon State University student Ali Hussain Alhamoud was charged with raping a young woman.
He was released on bail, which the Saudi government posted, and he flew back to Saudi Arabia that same day.
Sami Suliman Almezaini, of Gallatin County, Montana, is accused of raping his female roommate in July 2017, the same month he disappeared.
Saud Alabdullatif, of Spokane County, Washington, disappeared in May 2016. He was charged with forcible second-degree rape and unlawful imprisonment after he forced a woman to perform oral sex on him that month.
Abdullah Almakrami, of Milwaukee, Wisconsin, disappeared one month after he allegedly sexually assaulted a woman in March 2014.
Hani Alshammary, of Erie County, Pennsylvania, is accused of sexually assaulting a woman in April 2014.
He was charged with attempted rape, forcible compulsion, unlawful restraint, harassment and disorderly conduct.
Fahad Al Ghuwainem, of Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, disappeared in December 2014, two months after he allegedly raped a man with a male accomplice after the three linked up at a gay bar.
Siraj Marakeey, of Snohomish County, Washington, disappeared July 1991. He was accused of first-degree rape for sexually assaulting a child in June 1991.
These are not the only Saudi crimes overlooked by U.S. officials. There are vastly bigger crimes. There is the 9/11, committed by mostly Saudi terrorists. Yet, Saudi Arabia “warned it would start selling as much as $750 billion in Treasuries and other assets if Congress passes a bill allowing the kingdom to be held liable in U.S. courts for the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks.”
If Iranians had raped and killed Americans on American soil, it would be impossible for them to escape from the U.S., especially with the aid of the Iranian embassy and consulates.
If Iranians had committed the 9/11, it would be impossible for Iran to escape from the U.S. military interventions.
Saudi Arabia goes unpunished for any of its misdeeds because it is “one of America’s largest foreign creditors.”
So this is the reason that the U.S. military deploys thousands of young Americans to die “patriotically” for the Saudis. And for the sake of Saudis, the U.S. military kills. They killed an Iranian general — obviously, to please Saudis, who hate Iranians.
In his article “US Debt Got Us Hooked On Petrodollars… And On Saudi Arabia,” author Ryan McMaken said,
“But why should the US continue to so robustly support this dictatorial regime? Certainly, these close relations can't be due to any American support for democracy and human rights. The Saudi regime is one of the world's most illiberal and anti-democratic regimes. Its ruling class has repeatedly been connected to Islamist terrorist groups, with Foreign Policy magazine last year calling Saudi Arabia ‘the beating heart of Wahhabism — the harsh, absolutist religious creed that helped seed the worldviews of al Qaeda and the Islamic State.’ … The answer lies in the fact the Saudi state is at the center of US efforts to maintain the dollar as the world’s reserve currency, and to ensure global demand for US debt.”
In 1974 the U.S. made a devil’s deal with Saudi Arabia: Saudi Arabia and its Islamic allies would use only dollars for their oil transactions, strengthening the dollar as the world currency, and the U.S. would protect Saudi Arabia from its geopolitical enemies. The deal also included that Saudi Arabia had to invest in the U.S. and buy the massive U.S. debt. Saudi Arabia has done it, and as result the U.S. is, through its own debts, enslaved to Saudi Arabia.
So it is no wonder that whatever Saudi Arabia does in the U.S., against the U.S., against other nations and against Christians, the U.S. government just looks the other way. In fact, the U.S. not only does look the other way but also looks positively on Saudis even when nothing is positive. State Secretary Mike Pompeo, when he was the CIA director, visited Saudi Arabia to reward them for their efforts “against terrorism.” Did he add “good behavior” for Saudis involved in the 9/11? This reward was not result of reality. It was the act of a nation in debt pleasing its creditor.
Pompeo, who is an evangelical, traveled to Saudi Arabia representing the U.S. government and Christianity, because whatever post you have, you cannot dissociate your Christianity from it. The anti-reality reward was given by a U.S. citizen representing the U.S. government and evangelicals.
Is it any wonder that churches are closing and mosques are opening in America? The answer may be in the morally and spiritually disastrous deal of the U.S. with Saudi Arabia, where the former is enslaved to the latter through a massive and deep debt. The answer may be also in U.S. evangelicals, like Pompeo, accepting for America to submit to a terrorist Islamic dictatorship. Pat Robertson, one of the most prominent U.S. evangelical leaders, has completely excused the massive U.S. deals where American weapons are sold and transferred to Saudi Arabia — to aid and abet Saudi crimes, including crimes against Christians.
Will America with her evangelicals spend all the eternity pleasing her Saudi terrorist creditors?
With information from DailyMail and Zero Hedge.
Recommended Reading:

Saturday, January 18, 2020

Brazilian top culture official fired after quoting Nazi Goebbels while talking about nationalist art in a video as Hitler’s favorite composer played in the background


Brazilian top culture official fired after quoting Nazi Goebbels while talking about nationalist art in a video as Hitler’s favorite composer played in the background

By Julio Severo
Brazil’s top culture official was fired on January 17, 2020 after using phrases used by Hitler’s right-hand man, Joseph Goebbels, Nazi Germany’s minister of propaganda.
Roberto Alvim
The outrage was immediate, culminating in calls for the removal of Roberto Alvim, who was appointed, under the influence of Olavo de Carvalho, special secretary of culture by Brazil’s nationalist President Jair Bolsonaro.
“It is an unfortunate pronouncement, even with his apologies, making his tenure unsustainable,” Bolsonaro tweeted. “I reiterate our condemnation of totalitarian ideologies and genocides, like Nazism and Communism, as well as any type of allusion to them.”
Alvim’s scandal was a disappointment for Bolsonaro, who said recently about him: “After decades, we do have a real Culture Secretary.”
Roberto Alvim made the controversial comments while discussing a new art prize in a video distributed by the Bolsonaro administration. Lohengrin by Wagner, Hitler's favorite composer, played in the background.
Alvim acknowledged the similarity between his speech and the speech of Goebbels and he has even disavowed Nazism but said it was merely a “rhetorical coincidence.” When confronted by a journalist that his speech was based on Goebbels’s speech, Alvim admitted that he was aware of the similarity, but he defended its use adding that it was perfect.
The “rhetorical coincidence” of Alvim became an international scandal, with headlines in the U.S. saying:
* Washington Post: “Brazil’s culture secretary fired after appearing to paraphrase Nazi propaganda in speech.”
* New York Times: “Brazil’s Top Culture Official Fired Over Speech Evoking Nazi Propaganda.”
* Time magazine: “Brazil’s Culture Minister Fired After Quoting Joseph Goebbels in a Speech.”
In his speech Alvim said:
“The Brazilian art of the next decade will be heroic and will be national, will be endowed with great capacity for emotional involvement… deeply linked to the urgent aspirations of our people, or else it will be nothing.”
Parts of it are identical to a speech quoted in the book “Joseph Goebbels: A Biography,” by German historian Peter Longerich, who has written several works on the Holocaust:
“The German art of the next decade will be heroic, it will be steely-romantic, it will be factual and completely free of sentimentality, it will be national with great Pathos and committed, or it will be nothing.”
Alvim said in a radio interview that he chose the music himself, because the work is transcendent and stemmed from Wagner’s Catholic faith. Wagner was a Catholic who did not like Jews. This is the main reason Hitler loved him.
Speaking in a separate recorded message, with a wooden cross atop his desk, Alvim said he wants 2020 to mark a historic cultural rebirth to “create a new and thriving Brazilian civilization.”
Following release of his taped video, Brazil’s Israeli confederation Conib said in a statement: “To emulate [Goebbels’] view… is a frightening sign of his vision of culture, which must be combated and contained.” It called for his immediate removal, adding: “Brazil, which sent brave soldiers to combat Nazism on European soil, doesn’t deserve it.”
Germany’s embassy in Brazil condemned the speech in a post on Twitter, saying that it opposed “any attempt to banalize or glorify” an era that “brought infinite suffering for humanity.”
Goebbels led the Ministry of Enlightenment and Propaganda, designed to brainwash people into obeying the Nazis and idolizing Adolf Hitler and his nationalism. Its methods included censorship of the press and control of radio broadcasts, as well as control of culture and arts.
President Jair Bolsonaro made the decision to fire Alvim after a backlash from Jewish organizations, key lawmakers, political parties, artists and Brazil’s bar association.
U.S. newspapers suggested that the guiding force of Alvim’s radicalism was evangelicalism. The Washington Post said, “Alvim has been one of the most militant cultural warriors in the Bolsonaro government… he converted to evangelicalism after a nearly fatal cancer diagnosis.”
The Associated Press said that Alvim “is a born-again Christian who found renewed faith while recovering from cancer.”
“Born-again” is a term associated with evangelicalism. But Alvim is not an evangelical or even Protestant. In an interview with the Brazilian newspaper Gazeta do Povo, he said he had a tumor in his belly and permanent fever. He was healed after the evangelical babysitter of his son asked to pray for him. But his connection with evangelicalism ended in this point. After this dramatic and miraculous experience, instead of looking for an evangelical church, he got involved with Olavo de Carvalho and his movement that includes syncretic Catholicism. He began to attend the Catholic Church every day.
So the effort of the Washington Post, the Associated Press and other U.S. media to associate Alvim to evangelicalism is not realistic. The radicalism they saw in him does not stem from evangelicalism, but exclusively from Carvalho and his syncretic Catholicism.
On May 11, 2019 Alvim said on his Facebook:
“Given how much Professor Olavo de Carvalho has done for all of us, in view of the magnificent books that he has with so much sacrifice and care bequeathed us, the least we can do is to support him unconditionally.”
And on November 15, 2019, Carvalho, who is a self-exiled Brazilian in the U.S. since 2005, said on his Facebook:
“I repeat the warning: From my courses and books, whoever is smart gets smarter, whoever is stupid goes crazy.”
Bolsonaro had appointed Alvim not because evangelicals recommended him. He appointed by Carvalho’s recommendation.
So how can the Washington Post and the Associated Press suggest that Alvim and his crazy radicalism are evangelical? They are 100 percent Carvalho’s Catholicism.
On Twitter, Alvim regularly uses the hashtag DeusVult, echoing the traditional Catholic battle cry of Middle Ages crusaders. Carvalho has also a fixation on the Middles Ages, especially the Inquisition, which he defends passionately.
If Carvalho and his adherents can defend the Inquisition, which persecuted, tortured and killed multitudes of Jews, why cannot he and his adherents also defend Nazism, which likewise persecuted, tortured and killed of Jews?
If an intelligent man enrolls in Carvalho’s courses, he will easily see Carvalho’s crazy advocacy of the Inquisition against the Jews. If he does not see, Carvalho’s prophecy is fulfilled in him: the idiot ends crazy.
Because of massive backlash, Carvalho disavowed his former pupil Alvim.
Yet, Carvalho, who is considered Bolsonaro’s Rasputin, recommended Alvim to Bolsonaro not because Alvim is an idiot. On the contrary, Carvalho recommends only his best pupils. And his best pupil showed all the crazy culture he learned from his master.
Even though Carvalho disavowed Alvim, the Nazi connections are real. For years, Carvalho was the biggest propagandist in Brazil of the Islamic occultist René Guénon, whose most prominent disciple was Julius Evola, who wrote books advocating occultism and the right-wing ideology. Evola was a guru of the Italian fascist dictator Benito Mussolini. Evola’s books were also used by Nazis.
Evola and Guénon have been praised by Steven Bannon, a friend of Carvalho. Evola and Guénon have also been praised by Brazilian Foreign Minister Ernesto Araújo, an adherent of Carvalho.
Occultism has crazy connections and confusions. How could not Alvim reveal such religious traits?
The case of Alvim is a symptom of what may happen if the Bolsonaro administration fails. Newspapers around the world, ignoring the fact that Rasputin-guided Bolsonaro has filled his administration with inept adherents of Carvalho, will blame innocent evangelicals who voted for Bolsonaro.
With information from DailyMail, Washington Post, BBC, New York Times, Associated Press and Antagonista.
Recommended Reading:
Recommended Reading about the Inquisition: