Wednesday, June 13, 2018

Google Imposes Propaganda of Homosexual “Pride” on Users


Google Imposes Propaganda of Homosexual “Pride” on Users

By Julio Severo
I was searching through Google last week when the Google page flashed on my face,
“Celebrate Pride Month” #ThisIsFamily
This propaganda was accompanied by homosexual flags.
A whole month to celebrate… perverted homosexual sex and pervert the meaning of family for the advantage of the homosexual agenda! Cannot Google dedicate a whole month for the celebration of the natural family? Cannot Google dedicate a whole month to Jesus and the Bible, which had a fundamental role in the U.S. history and culture?
People want to celebrate positive events as Christmas and Easter, not negative events as pride in homosexual sex. When most people think of family, the first picture that comes naturally to the mind is a man, a woman and children, never a group of worshippers of anal sex celebrating homosexual sex. Why pervert the natural family and induce people to celebrate proudly the crime of perverting it?
I am not celebrating any “pride” on homosexuality. Most people also are not celebrating it. Why then does Google impose such propaganda on its users?
Normal people have no pride in anal sex. They are proud of the natural family: a man, a woman and children. No one is proud of a group of worshippers of anal sex celebrating homosexual sex!
Google is an American company created by Americans. Most Americans celebrate Christmas and Jesus, but Google never mentions this celebration massively recognized by Americans.
Most Americans celebrate Easter and Jesus’s resurrection, but Google never mentions this celebration massively recognized by Americans.
Most Americans celebrate family as a man, a woman and children, but Google’s idea of family includes a group of worshippers of anal sex gathered together. Google’s idea and propaganda have no place in the whole American history. George Washington, the first U.S. president, in no way accepted worshippers of anal sex.
Why does Google reject popular historical celebrations respected by large numbers of Americans and give preference to a “celebration” of pride of anal sex and other homosexual perversions accepted only by a fringe of extremists?
It is a duty of the U.S. government to intervene against threats to its national security. Is not family such a national security issue?
Google suggested that pride in anal sex is “family.” Did the founders of America see worshippers of anal sex as “family”? Were they worshippers of homosexual depravities? Did they advocate that pride in homosexual sex represents family? So why does the U.S. government do nothing to stop this desecration of its most important national resource, family?
For lesser threats, the U.S. has militarily intervened in the affairs of other nations. Why not a military intervention in Google too?
If the U.S. can send troops to far-away nations to solve issues with no relation to the U.S. national security, why cannot the U.S. send its troops to the Google headquarters and stop its abuses against its users and the American family?
Forsaking one’s own family to meddle in the affairs of distant nations is not patriotism. It is to betray the most important values of a homeland.
Why wage stupid wars in far-away nations if the U.S. is not able to wage the most important war in its own soil and protect the integrity of family from greedy companies that have overstepped their limits?
If the U.S. government cannot intervene in Google, why intervene in far-away nations? Is oil more important than family? To protect and heavily arm the Islamic dictatorship of Saudi Arabia is more important than to protect family?
Yet, how can the U.S. government intervene in Google if its own State Department, headed by an evangelical Christian, has also declared June as the LGBTI Pride Month?
Recommended Reading:

Sunday, June 10, 2018

Facebook Censors Picture against Islamic Sexual Violence against European Girls


Facebook Censors Picture against Islamic Sexual Violence against European Girls

By Julio Severo
After I posted hours ago a picture against the Islamic sexual violence against European girls, Facebook gave me this message:
It looks like something you posted doesn’t follow our Community Standards. On Facebook, we don’t allow offers of sexual services, solicitation of sexual material, threats or depictions of sexual violence, threats to share intimate images or any sexual content involving minors.
We understand that you may not have known about these standards, so we’d encourage you to learn more about our policies on sexual exploitation and violence. If you’ve seen or experienced something on Facebook that you think goes against these or any of our other standards, you can report it to us.
Thanks for your understanding and help in keeping Facebook safe and welcoming.
This is the “offensive” picture:
Next, Facebook said to me:
You’re Temporarily Blocked From Posting
This temporary block will last 30 days, and you won’t be able to post on Facebook until it’s finished.
You’ve repeatedly posted things that aren’t allowed on Facebook. Read the Facebook Community Standards to learn what kinds of posts aren’t allowed.
So my Facebook account (https://www.facebook.com/julio.severo) will be blocked for thirty days (effective June 10, 2018) not because I advocated Islamic sexual violence against European girls. I was blocked because I used a picture denouncing Islamic sexual violence against European girls!
This is not the first 30-day block of Facebook against me.
The whole month of February 2018 I remained blocked because I denounced the homosexual agenda and the Islamic invasion of Europe. See my article: Why Does Facebook Harass and Censor Christians?
Facebook also imposed a 30-day block against me on December 2017 because I mentioned the Christian duty to love sinners, including homosexuals. You can read my article here: Why Does Facebook Grant Free Speech to Anti-Christian Radicals and Impose Censorship on Christians?
And on June 2017 Facebook imposed another 30-day block against me because I was reporting on Brazilians who were fined for calling a homosexual “fag.” See my article: “Facebook, Censorship, Profanity, Name-Calling and Foul Language.” In this case, Facebook backtracked after a California-based legal group threatened to sue Facebook on my behalf. Because of the legal threat, Facebook recognized that its actions were censorship. See my article: Facebook Acknowledges Its Own Censorship on Julio Severo. What Happens Now?
Perhaps one of the most shameful acts of Facebook against me was to censor Leviticus 18:22, a famous Bible verse that I had posted on my profile, but Facebook did not like it and removed it. See my article: Help! Facebook Is Censoring Bible Verses
This censorship against a Bible verse immediately became headline on WND (WorldNetDaily), in a report titled “Famous Bible verse too sizzling for Facebook.”
Because of this scandal, Facebook contacted WND with this message:
“As soon as we were notified of the problem, we began to investigate and restored the content as soon as we were able to identify the mistake. The content has been restored since it didn’t violate our standards. We’ve informed Mr. Severo of the restoration and apologized for the error.” (See the WND report “Facebook finally responds on censoring hot Bible verse”)
Yet, the Bible post was not restored and I have never received any apology from Facebook.
If the Facebook owner, who is a left-wing Jew, does not care even about Leviticus 18:22, a famous verse from the Jewish Scriptures, why would he care about a post attacking Islamic sexual violence against European girls?
What I wonder is: How can a Jew, who belongs to a race and religion historically oppressed by Muslims, censor my effort to denounce Islamic sexual violence?
Earlier this year, a Jew denounced Facebook for excluding Israel and including Palestine. Is Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg against his own race and evangelical Christians, the most important allies of the Jews?
Tell Mr. Zuckerberg that Julio Severo is an evangelical Christian who is a passionate advocate of the Bible and Israel in its biblical borders.
Recommended Reading on Facebook Censorship:
Another Recommended Reading:
Recommended Reading on the U.S. Left against Julio Severo:

Wednesday, June 06, 2018

Religious Exemption: How Homosexuality Is Transforming U.S. Christianity into a Ghetto


Religious Exemption: How Homosexuality Is Transforming U.S. Christianity into a Ghetto

By Julio Severo
U.S. conservatives have hailed the victory of Jack Phillips, a Christian baker who exercised his right not to make a wedding cake to a homosexual couple, because a homosexual “wedding” is an affront to God, biological sex and natural family. He was sued by the insolent predatory homosexual couple, but he won in a long legal battle.
In a free and democratic society, there would be no long or short legal battle because you are free to offer services to anyone you want and clients are free to reject you and find another provider. But freedom is becoming a rare commodity in the U.S. market and any petty issue of personal freedom becomes a big problem to be solved by the U.S. Supreme Court. It is utter shame that the highest court in America was necessary to solve so a small issue.
Homosexual activists began their campaign against traditional family and biological sexuality decades ago. They were on the defensive, but eventually they turned the tables. A radical minority put the non-radical majority on the defensive, and today their assault against the non-radical majority has been so atrocious that even when Christians have a success stand on a petty issue as a cake, it is hailed as a big victory — while they lost the major battle: marriage.
In the 1980s, U.S. conservative evangelicals fought against sodomy. Next, against gay “marriage” in the late 1990s and 2000s. Now they just fight for religious exemption. Next, will they be living in a ghetto or in jail? Is this what do they interpret as “victory”?
Free speech or religious freedom has become the last stand of the non-radical majority suffering systematic assault from the radical minority. And what is such strategy producing? Reduction of U.S. Christianity. Protestants, who were 98% of the U.S. population in the foundation of the U.S. Republic, now comprise less than 50%.
The fight for free speech is not helping U.S. Christianity. In fact, it is creating a hybrid Christian creature, as I have showed in my article “’Free Speech,’ The Ultimate False Gospel in America.”
While the suffering Christianity, which had no religious exemption and freedom, kept expanding in the Roman Empire and the Soviet Union, in the U.S. is happening just the contrary. It is being constricted by the radical minority.
The fact is, as recognized by U.S. conservatives, “acceptance of homosexuality is growing even among ‘conservatives.’
When “conservatives” accept homosexuality or even embrace the impossible — “conservative” homosexuals —, the end is near. Last year, pedophilia advocacy knocked down the most prominent “conservative” gay in the U.S. More to come among “conservatives”? Yes, more has come. This year, CPAC, the top U.S. conservative conference, banned a pro-family Christian group and approved homosexualist group.
Yet, the signs were already coming and conservatives did not protest. In the Republican National Convention endorsing Donald Trump in 2016, PayPal founder Peter Thiel, who was one of the main speakers at this convention, shamelessly announced, “I’m a proud gay man.” Instead of being repudiated for his proud and impudent homosexuality, Thiel was hailed. Trump was also hailed for holding a homosexual flag during his campaign.
More recently, State Department Secretary Mike Pompeo recognized June as LGBTI Pride Month. Pompeo, who is one of the most important officials of Trump, is considered a very devout evangelical Christian. While conservatives are celebrating a slice of the cake — the Jack Phillips case —, homosexual activists are celebrating homosexual “marriage” as the law of the land and a very devout evangelical Christian leading the State Department in the celebration of sodomy. Most of the cake belongs to them. There is no doubt that homosexual activists are achieving the biggest victories and celebrations.
While homosexual activists will keep fighting for big game, conservatives will be fighting for cookies and crumbs. They will be fighting for exemptions — the right to enter and stay in the closet. Homosexual activists went out, and conservatives are going in.
Homosexual activists demand — and are granted — more and more rights to impose on everything and everyone, including the indoctrination of children. Conservative Christians are fighting just for the right to remain “protected” in their Christian closets.
The worse is the bad example. If America is, with her power and her State Department, leading nations around the world to celebrate homosexuality, what kind of example U.S. conservative evangelicals are giving to conservative evangelicals around the world regarding homosexuality? Compromise and shameful concession.
So U.S. Christians won on a cake issue, but they are losing all other major battles involving homosexuality. And because evangelicals were Trump’s main voting block in 2016, if evangelical numbers keep being reduced, genuine conservative candidates will not be elected anymore, and “conservative” candidates will have to look like more like liberals, including by supporting homosexuality. This is already happening. Trump has taken no measure against homosexual “marriage” and similar advances made by Obama.
Probably, no American conservative has seen this issue better than Matthew Trewhella, in his article “Religious Liberty and the Ghettoization of Christianity in America.” He said,
Most of the conservative, pro-family, and Christian groups have made ‘religious liberty’ their rallying cry over the last two years. The matter comes to an apex [with] the case about a Colorado baker, Jack Phillips…
I do not share the enthusiasm of many over this matter of ‘religious liberty,’ however. Let us step back and look at the larger picture.
The cry for religious liberty began after the Supreme Court issued their depraved opinion on homosexual marriage in 2015. Religious liberty became the latest retreat of the GOP and the conservatives. Religious liberty became the latest retreat of the pro-family and Christian groups.
First they stood against sodomy itself. Then they accommodated themselves to sodomy and retreated to opposing homosexual marriage. Now they have accommodated themselves to homosexual marriage and have retreated to defending religious liberty.
But here is the rub — If the Supreme Court rules in Jack Phillips favor, the result will be Christians do not have to participate in homosexual marriages, but homosexual marriage remains entrenched in the land.
And this is what religious liberty accomplishes in this matter – it assures the evil will continue in the land and it accommodates the continued ghettoization of Christianity in America.
Evil should be stopped, not accommodated. When the government enacts evil in the land, but they make an accommodation for Christians to not participate in it, they are marginalizing Christianity in the land; they are putting Christianity in the ghetto.
Christians love religious liberty not because it acts as a bulwark against evil in the land, but because it allows them to continue to sit and sip their lattes while there is evil in the land.
It allows Christians to continue to be “Christians,” while they continue to remain indifferent towards the evil in the land.
It also prevents them from suffering for their faith.
For decades now, when certain immoral laws have been passed, there is a religious exemption added. These laws seem good to the average self-absorbed, Pietistic Christian, but in reality they serve to belittle and depreciate Christianity and Christians within the culture. And this is what the pro-family and Christian groups are appealing to SCOTUS to do.
With hat in hand, they are pleading with the tyrant — the Supreme Court which has trampled state laws outlawing sodomy and trampled state constitutions declaring marriage between only a man and a woman — and asking the tyrant for a dispensation. This is whoredom.
Laws or policies that protect Christians from being personally affected by evil laws – but which allow the evil to continue in the nation – are themselves evil laws or policies.
Why should Christians be allowed to bypass the evil while the rest of the culture has to imbibe upon it and become further debauched? If you allow the evil of sodomy to fester in the land, the effects of such filth will be felt by all – believer and unbeliever.
Let me make clear: Jack Phillips is one of those rare Christians that actually loves Christ and neighbor. The vast majority of Christians in America wouldn’t give a passing thought to standing true to Christ if it meant missing out on making a buck (or saving a buck). So for his sake, I hope he wins…
Christians need to understand that they must demonstrate vigilance against tyranny. They must give up what most Americans pursue — wealth and ease. They must give some time and effort to good governance, and not continue to ignore the magistrates.
Recommended Reading:

Monday, June 04, 2018

For Second Year, Trump’s State Department Recognizes June as LGBTI Pride Month


For Second Year, Trump’s State Department Recognizes June as LGBTI Pride Month

By Julio Severo
U.S. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo recognized June 2018 as Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender and Intersex (LGBTI) Pride Month — continuing the tradition of the State Department of Hillary Clinton under former president Barack Obama.
“The United States joins people around the world in celebrating Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, and Intersex (LGBTI) Pride Month, and reaffirms its commitment to protecting and defending the human rights of all, including LGBTI persons,” Pompeo said in a statement.
The United States joins only Europe and liberal nations in this celebration. No conservative nation has joined it.
U.S. embassies and consulates have also received guidance from the State Department to celebrate the LGBTI Pride Month.
Why is, as was the Obama administration, the Trump administration so interested in indoctrinating other nations to celebrate homosexuality? Last year, President Donald Trump’s State Department did the same celebration for a whole month.
Should homosexuality ever be a cause for celebration? Obama and Hillary celebrated it because they were not real Christian. But conservatives expected much more from Trump and especially Pompeo, who was described by CBN (Christian Broadcasting Network) as “a very devout Christian.”
CBN also assured, in a March 2018 report, that Pompeo “will likely have a positive effect on US foreign policy.” The fulfillment of this expectation would have been important because it would eliminate Obama’s influence, which was imposing the homosexual agenda around the world through his State Department. Even under Trump, the U.S. foreign policy has been the same moral disaster as it was under Obama. Last year, Trump’s State Department pressured Romania to embrace homosexual activism.
With Pompeo, conservatives expected a change… that has not come.
Nevertheless, CBN had predicted evangelical Christians would have cause to celebrate as Pompeo is a very devout Christian.
“It’s a tremendous pick for evangelical Christians. He's a very devout Christian. He actually even held a Bible study inside the White House,” CBN said.
Pro-life and pro-family organizations praised Trump’s appointment of Pompeo as Secretary of State because they thought that he would never celebrate homosexuality and never recognize a homosexual month. All of them were wrong.
In its enthusiastic support of Pompeo, CBN noted that he is also very pro-Israel. But how is this important, as far as the homosexual agenda is concerned, since Israel has a right-wing government that supports this agenda?
In his official statement, Pompeo said, “In many parts of the world, LGBTI individuals and their supporters continue to face violence, arrest, harassment and intimidation”, stopping just short of condemning Saudi Arabia, known for violence, arrest, harassment and intimidation of homosexuals.
Last year, as CIA chief Pompeo made a special trip to Saudi Arabia to reward Saudi dictators for fighting Islamic terror. An award to the Islamic dictatorship of Saudi Arabia for fighting terrorism is akin to an award to Hitler for fighting Nazism or to an award to Stalin for fighting the Soviet communism.
If Pompeo keeps consistent with such inconsistency, now will he make another special trip to Saudi Arabia to reward Saudi dictators for fighting violence, arrest, harassment and intimidation of homosexuals?
The problem with the homosexual impositions and pressures from the U.S. State Department, under Obama and Trump, is that their main victims are not Saudi Muslims, but innocent Christians.
The same homosexual principles that drove U.S. diplomacy under Obama now drive the U.S. diplomacy under Trump. The only difference is that while Obama was vocal about these principles, Trump gives a tacit support, by allowing his own administration to speak for himself. If the saying “silence means assent” is correct, Trump’s “silence” is a message. Even Trump’s daughter Ivanka has broken his “silence” to support the Month of LGBTQ Pride.
It is an old tactic that when a president wants to support a policy, but he cannot do it directly not to offend his conservative allies, he does it indirectly through his direct subordinates, who cannot act against his direct orders.
It a very bad sign that Trump is, through Pompeo, “discreetly” supporting the use of the U.S. foreign policy to advance and make great the same sin that destroyed Sodom. As soon as Trump has no conservative allies to offend, he will immediately support directly this sin, without a need to use Pompeo and others.
As soon as Trump has no conservative allies to please, he will do as he pleases, without a need to use his subordinates to support causes he could not support directly.
While America under Obama and Trump is worried about homosexuality, other nations are worried about the homosexual threat to children. Russia, for example, came to the conclusion the only thing that can protect young boys from predatory homosexuality is a ban on homosexual propaganda, and Russia approved such ban in 2013.
Under Obama, it was just natural for the U.S. foreign policy to be anti-Russia, given that conservative Russia has an exemplary law banning homosexual propaganda to children and adolescents. Now under Trump, allegedly a more conservative administration, the U.S. should have a better law banning homosexual propaganda to children and adolescents, but it has not. It should have a conservative State Department shunning the pro-homosexuality stances of the Obama era, but it has not. It should have a foreign policy against the homosexual ideology, but it has a pro-sodomy foreign policy. It should have a State Department protecting children from predatory homosexuality, but it has not. So as far as the homosexual agenda is concerned, under Trump conservative Russia will continue to face the moral clashes it faced under Obama.
It was very easy for us conservatives to fight against Obama’s State Department because everything that came from Obama was pro-homosexuality. But how are conservatives to fight when a celebration of homosexuality comes officially from a State Department under the direct leadership of “a very devout” Christian?
Conservatives worked hard to support a State Secretary who is “a very devout” Christian, and now he behaves as a devout left-wing. Has he betrayed Jesus Christ, whom he had a commitment that is more important than human commitments?
The Bible says about devout Christians who betray their Master:
“For behold, those who are far from You shall perish; You will destroy all who are false to You and like [spiritual] harlots depart from You.” (Psalm 73:27 AMPC)
Jesus said,
“And I tell you, everyone who acknowledges me before men, the Son of Man also will acknowledge before the angels of God, but the one who denies me before men will be denied before the angels of God.” (Luke 12:8-9 ESV)
Wherever he is, in a government post or other place, a very devout Christian honors Jesus and what He says in his Word — including about homosexuality. A very devout left-winger honors and celebrates homosexuality.
If actually Pompeo is a very devout Christian, does it mean that his celebration of homosexuality was ordered by his boss? Why not renounce instead of honoring sin?
Obama used the U.S. government to lead the world, by his bad example, into accepting the homosexual lifestyle as normal. By tacit or explicit support, the Trump administration is leading the world in the same bad example.
Trump is a man who speaks, and does it strongly on strong issues. His silence while his very devout Christian official celebrates homosexuality is a strong sign that he also approves it and that in due time he will strongly defend the same issues they are defending.
The State Department has international power and its homosexual decisions harm the international community, which was tired of Obama’s homosexual imperialism. Why continue this imperialism?
America’s influence cannot to be underestimated. The homosexual movement became active in Brazil by direct cultural effect from America, including her politics and Hollywood.
Brazil, which is the largest Catholic nation in the world, is also one of the biggest imitators of the most depraved aspects of the U.S. culture. With such knowledge, I wrote the book “O Movimento Homossexual” (The Homosexual Movement), published in 1998 by the Brazilian branch of Bethany House Publishers, explaining how the homosexual movement would increase in Brazil just by imitating America, including with homosexual indoctrination in the schools.
People called me crazy in the late 1990s, saying that Brazilian schools would never have homosexual indoctrination. But today they have it. America affects Brazil, for better or worse.
Obama’s and Clinton’s bad example in homosexual politics affected Brazil. Trump administration’s bad example will affect Brazil and other nations.
Trump’s silence, while his very devout Christian official celebrates the homosexual abnormality in the international community, is sheer connivance. To recognize a LGBTI month as a cause for “pride” and celebration is a stupid praise and celebration. Homosexuality is a cause of shame and scandals, not pride and celebration. Why then is Trump’ State Department so proud of a LGBT month?
When a very devout Christian official of Trump openly encourage celebration of homosexual wickedness under the silence of his boss, his silence is connivance.
Homosexuality is a disgrace and wherever it is present, perversion is its result. The biggest scandals in the Catholic Church today are caused by homosexual priests. Homosexuality is a cause of shame and scandals, not pride and celebration, in the Catholic Church and other institutions.
Why does Trump’s State Department want to praise and encourage in the international community a behavioral abnormality and perversion that causes scandals and tragedy to children? Why does not the State Department engage itself in an international campaign to protect children from the homosexual propaganda and its evils?
I admired when America, her presidents and administrations praised and encouraged people to read the Bible, which condemns homosexuality.
George Washington, the first U.S. president, condemned homosexuality. The only proper diplomatic attitude to homosexuality is condemnation and discouragement.
Washington’s attitude was a good example. He was actually a very devout Christian. What Obama’s State Department did and what Trump’s State Department is doing is bad example.
Of course, extremist groups should be condemned. Some pro-Inquisition Catholics advocate capital punishment for homosexuals, and I have publicly rebuked them for it in my article “A Global Inquisition to Put Homosexuals to Death?” In fact, there are now right-wing Catholic groups in Brazil justifying the Inquisition by using Trump! Yet, extremist groups should not be used as excuse to protect predatory homosexuality. Children, not homosexual propaganda, need protection and priority.
Probably, the Trump administration is supporting the homosexual agenda to please the Left, which even so is not pleased, because it wants the whole cake, and Trump is giving them only one slice.
As a Brazilian conservative evangelical, I ask U.S. evangelicals to press the Trump administration to abandon Obama’s homosexual imperialism in the Trump administration and his State Department and honor his commitment to his evangelical constituents, who were instrumental for his victory. The Trump administration should defend family against predatory homosexuality, which is a special threat to children.
Trump and Pompeo can learn from Washington’s good example and be a good example for the world.
I am moved and encouraged by Washington’s good example, but I am ashamed by the bad example in Trump’s State Department, which says that it is worried about human rights of homosexuals but neither the White House nor Pompeo have publicly condemned the U.S. ally, Saudi Arabia, for violence, arrest, harassment and intimidation of homosexuals.
How can Trump’s State Department and its embassies and consulates say to the world that America is proud of homosexuality? So is America under Trump ashamed of George Washington and the Bible he believed in? Is America under Trump ashamed that the Bible, the Book that made America great, condemns homosexuality?
Can a very devout Christian dedicate a whole month to celebrate homosexuality? So why did Pompeo do it?
If Sodom was destroyed over homosexual sin, how does America expect to escape God’s judgment over the same sin?
“Righteousness lifts up a nation, but sin is a disgrace in any society.” (Proverbs 14:34 GWV)
With information from Christian Broadcasting Network and the U.S. State Department.
Recommended Reading: