Russia vs. the LGBT Globalists
A Climate of Hate and Fear
By Dr.
Scott Lively
Whenever
and wherever normal people resist the mainstreaming of homosexuality, the LGBT
movement and its allies attribute that resistance to “a climate of hate and
fear” orchestrated by evil “homophobes” who exploit the prejudices of the
ignorant by telling lies about “gay and lesbian people” who “just want equal
rights.” They predict a wave a violence against “sexual minorities” and then
set out to create their own evidence in support of it, all for the purpose of
manipulating public opinion and public officials into the role of “protectors
of the innocent.”
Here
in America the strategy was first initiated on a small scale with human rights
commissions at the local level in the 1970s, then at the state level and
finally nationally in conjunction with the current massive leftist campaign to
create a constitutional right to “gay marriage” by judicial fiat. Homosexualist
Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy famously struck down the federal Defense
of Marriage Act in United States v. Windsor on the grounds that opposition to
homosexual “marriage” was motivated by “animus” (hatred). SCOTUS will likely
use the same false logic when it rules for “gay marriage” this summer (absent a
miraculous intervention by God).
This
dangerous LGBT strategy has now gone global and the target is the Russian
Federation.
To
those who don’t fully recognize the Machiavellian character of the LGBT
movement, or the extent to which the American media (even to an increasing
extent FOX News) has become a sort-of “Gay Pravda,” what I’m about to state may
seem crazy, but bear with me.
Not that it doesn’t also serve
other globalist interests, but I have come to believe that protecting and
advancing the LGBT agenda is the primary reason that Barack Obama orchestrated
the coup to start a civil war in Ukraine. (See this excellent article on the
theme that Obama‘s foreign policy is ideologically-driven, though it doesn‘t
specifically address the homosexual agenda: http://us-russia.org/2934-stratfors-george-friedman-and-realism-in-american-foreign-policy.html.)
We were reminded this week that the
LGBT agenda is a “core value” of the Obama administration when he appointed the
first ever U.S. global envoy for “gay rights” http://news.yahoo.com/us-names-first-envoy-gay-rights-211447354.html.
He had previously tasked the State Department to make the LGBT agenda a top
priority of US policy abroad. http://www.massresistance.org/docs/gen2/12a/obama_memo_120611/index.html
To
the Obama administration this is, literally, again literally, what is meant by
“American values,” though most people don’t grasp this and still translate the
phrase to something benign and wholesome such as “Mom and Apple Pie” or the like.
TO BO, core values are not freedom of speech — that’s clearly trumped by “gay
rights” in his world. Nor economic freedom — you can’t run a business that
refuses to bake cakes, take photos, or provide flowers for “gay weddings.” Core
American values to Obama are publicly celebrated sodomy and doctor-assisted
transsexual self-mutilation.
In
this commitment to “gay rights” BO is joined by and represents an ideological
cartel of global elitists who have cooperated together to force it upon the
world. More on that in a later essay.
The Russian anti-propaganda law,
passed June 11, 2013, was the first truly effective international
counter-measure since the "gay" agenda went global around the turn of
the millennium. Typically, the “gays” characterized the law as hateful and an
incitement to violence, but in doing so they revealed that propagandizing
children is part of their agenda, since the law simply classifies
"propaganda of non-traditional sexual relationships" as material that
cannot be distributed among minors and commands the government to protect
children from it. http://www.article19.org/data/files/medialibrary/37129/13-06-27-russia-LA.pdf
Just
after the passage of this law Barack Obama did an about-face on the
"reset" policy (in which Russia had been recognized as an equal
partner in the world community) and instead began reviving cold-war rhetoric.
During the Sochi Olympics of February
2014, BO tried to steer Russia back into line through the usual media-driven
pressure tactics (which don't work on Russians who endured worse under the
Soviets).http://www.scottlively.net/2014/02/22/pro-russian-press-conference/
When that didn't work BO started
the civil war in Ukraine to force Russia into its current no-win scenario
there. US diplomats were caught red-handed in the early stages of this regime
change: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/02/06/victoria-nuland-eu_n_4740004.html.
Nuland
said “F*** the EU,” because it resisted the plan for forced Ukraine regime
change as inimical to it’s business interests but (in my view) the US didn‘t
care because it‘s interests were ideological and punitive.
BO
knew, of course, that Ukraine to the Russians was the strategic equivalent of
Cuba, or even Hawaii, to the US and they could never simply acquiesce to the
transfer of their most critical warm-water port in Crimea and oil interests in
the east to a hostile US-controlled regime.
The
Russians were deliberately pushed into a situation where they could be
portrayed as bullies — rather like the way a couple of “gay” activists set up
the conservative State of Texas as aggressors. They (allegedly) orchestrated
their own arrest for sodomy so they could portray themselves as victims to a
Supreme Court majority (led by Kennedy again) looking for a chance to strike
down the anti-sodomy laws. Thus we got the 2003 Lawrence v Texas ruling, which
was used as the “moral impetus” for the first “gay marriage” law in
Massachusetts in 2004.
Texas
wasn’t breaking down anyone’s door to enforce its sodomy law (any more than the
Russians were aggressing against Ukrainians before the US coup) but was pushed
into doing so by LGBT agents provocateur. No
one produces better agents provocateur than the LGBT movement, which has
presumably been well represented in the US intelligence agencies since Bill
Clinton lifted the ban on top-secret security clearance for “gays” in August
2,1995.
After the Ukraine coup d’etat, BO
and his media stooges then joined with anti-family GOP snake-in-the-grass John
McCain and his fellow neo-cons (and their media stooges) in a relentless
campaign of war propaganda on the theme that Russia is intent on reconstructing
the evil Soviet empire. In just over a year Obama and McCain et al, have turned
Russia into a pariah state in the view of the US and EU sheeple, based on
nothing but disingenuous portrayals of the Ukraine crisis and unsupported
fear-mongering that Russia intends military adventures against the Baltic
states.
Incidentally, John McCain’s former
chief strategist, Steve Schmidt, was hired in 2013 by the ACLU “to build GOP
support in the states for legislation to make gay marriage legal” http://www.politico.com/playbook/0613/playbook11032.html.
And
while we’re on the subject of Republicans, don’t believe for a second that the
GOP establishment is not kowtowing to “gay rights” behind the scenes just as
much as the Dems do it openly. Even under ostensibly pro-family George W. Bush
the State Department was pushing the homosexual agenda around the world. I
personally confronted the diplomatic staff at the US embassy in Riga, Latvia in
2007 for helping to organize a “Gay Pride” parade in defiance of an
overwhelming pro-family majority in that conservative nation.
Apparently deciding it’s now time
to stop hiding their homophilia, Bush dynasty heir apparent Jeb just hired a
top LGBT activist as his communications director http://stevedeace.com/news/bush-hires-one-of-d-c-s-30-most-influencial-homosexuals-as-communications-director/
And here’s another bombshell that
missed the conservative media. The Human Rights Campaign effort to characterize
American pro-family activism in foreign countries as fostering “hate and fear”
(an effort which labels me Public Enemy #1) was funded by GOP mega-donors Paul
Singer and Daniel Loeb http://www.washingtonblade.com/2013/11/06/controversy-over-hrcs-international-push-paul-singer/
Back
to Russia. Recently I was interviewed by the BBC for a documentary the
producers said was about “the global culture war.” However, the interview
focused heavily on my reaction to the reports of — Surprise! — an alleged
increase in “anti-gay” violence in countries that have passed laws against
homosexuality” particularly Russia and Uganda These reports (which they never showed
actually showed me) were allegedly prepared by Human Rights Watch, Amnesty
International, the United Nations, and Sexual Minorities Uganda (SMUG),
bastions of impartiality all. (Btw, SMUG is suing me for “Crimes Against
Humanity” for preaching against homosexuality in their country). http://www.scottlively.net/2012/06/28/my-analysis-of-the-smug-lawsuit/
This
brings us back full circle to the theme of this essay. I told the BBC
interviewer that I did not view any of these sources as trustworthy on the
issue of homosexuality and cited the Matthew Shepard and David Kato murders as
evidence. Indeed, I had already accused Human Rights Watch of indulging in
pro-“gay” propaganda in their first video purporting to show Russian anti-gay
violence (released to coincide with the Olympics), where I exposed the LGBT
movement’s fraud in their characterizations of the Shepard and Kato incidents: http://www.scottlively.net/2014/02/10/the-anti-russian-human-rights-watch-video-is-a-hoax/
So here’s the moment of truth for
pro-family analysts and advocates. Do you really grasp the extent to which LGBT
leaders and activists will go to serve their own interests? You’ve seen what
they do at the street level, against Christian businesses, etc. What would that
deviltry look like on an international level, if, say, the President of the
United States were a “gay” activist?
In
August of 2013 I sent a open letter to President Putin, thanking him for
signing the anti-propaganda law. In it I warned him “not to assume that you
have fully solved the problem by the enactment of this law. The battle to
protect your society from homosexualization has only just begun, and you may be
surprised to discover in the coming months and years just how aggressively many
world leaders will work to try to intimidate and coerce you to capitulate to
homosexualist demands.” http://www.scottlively.net/2013/08/30/an-open-letter-to-president-vladimir-putin/
Regardless
of where one stands on Ukraine or Vladimir Putin, just for a moment consider
where the pro-family movement would be if it hadn't been for the Ukraine coup.
Russia would still be (relatively speaking) a respected member of the
international community offering an alternative, genuinely pro-family model for
social policy. There would likely be at least a half-dozen nations which would
have adopted the anti-propaganda law for themselves (with many more considering
it) and there would be a healthy international debate raging on pro-family vs
LGBT visions for the future. I believe the tide would probably have begun to
turn in our favor, at least on the global scene, if not yet in the US or EU.
Is it really so far-fetched to
believe that morally wicked, Imperialistic, Alinsky-ite Obama (credibly alleged
to be a homosexual himself) started the Ukrainian civil war to punish Russia
for opposing the “core value” of America, the priority of his State Department?
Or (more importantly to the “gays”) to prevent the Russians from leading a
pro-family counter-revolution in the world?
Are
you as a pro-family conservative really going to accept the word of Barack
Obama, John McCain and the mainstream media that Russia is the bad guy in this
story? If you do, you really don’t know your enemy — and I’m not talking about
Putin.
Next
time you hear the implication that Russia has created “a climate of hate and
fear” in Ukraine, Russia or anywhere else, just remember whose go-to strategy
this is for smearing its opponents and how deeply they are entrenched in the
media, the White House and now the GOP establishment as well.
Source: Scott
Lively, via Last
Days Watchman
Recommended Reading:
Obama is a radical Marxist and under his two-term rule, he is expanding America as a pro-Islam, pro-sodomy Marxist empire. This is the only reason that he and neocons have been fighting very hard more conservative Russia. Now, the borders of Obama’s empire are Ukraine, whose “revolution” was provoked by Marxist billionaire George Soros, and other nations neighboring Russia. The real threat is Islamic, but pro-sodomy, pro-Islam emperor Obama has turned the Russia issue into a smokescreen for his real intents and the intents of his empire.
ReplyDelete