Russia Suspected in Cyber Attack on Campaign of Pro-Sodomy Hillary Clinton
By Julio
Severo
The
Russian government says it had zero involvement in the hacking of Democratic
Party emails while U.S. officials say the hack originated in Russia.
President
Vladimir Putin said in February he had seen specific intelligence suggesting
Russia’s foreign enemies—code for Washington—were preparing to meddle in
Russian parliamentary elections later this year.
And
in 2011, Putin accused the U.S. State Department and Hillary Clinton, its then
head, of stirring up street protests against his rule. Besides, while Clinton
was leading her State Department in a homosexual crusade to impose
homosexuality around the world, Putin was passing a law to ban homosexual
propaganda to children and adolescents in Russia.
There
was (and there is still) a blatant pro-sodomy interference by socialists
Obama and Clinton in the U.N. system and conservative nations in Africa that
are dependent on U.S. aid.
“We
need to head off any external attempts to interfere in the elections, in our
domestic political life,” Putin, who is facing re-election in 2018, told
officers from Russia’s FSB security service in February.
“You
know that certain kinds of (political) technologies exist and have already been
used in many countries.”
He
was meaning Ukraine, Libya, Egypt and Syria, which Obama and Clinton
irresponsibly destabilized. Based on this experience, Putin believes the United
States is trying to foment the same kind of unrest to oust him.
His
credo, set out when talking about Islamic State last year, is to strike first “if
a fight is inevitable” and, as Russia has shown in its reaction to NATO’s
aggressive build-up near its borders, to respond in kind.
Clearly
the Russian government feels it should and can destabilize socialists Hillary
Clinton and Barack Obama in much the same the United States and Europe have
inserted themselves into Ukrainian, Libyan, Egyptian and Syrian politics and
insert themselves into Russian politics.
For
Russia, it is fair play. The United States and its NATO allies involved
themselves in politics in Ukraine and other Russian neighbors and Russia feels
they should also get involved.
Kremlin-backed
media has tilted its coverage in favor of more conservative Trump over more
socialist Clinton, and Putin has praised the Republican candidate as “very talented.”
Why Russia would want to destabilize and expose a socialist, not a more
conservative, candidate in the U.S. election is an issue neocons and
like-minded activists opposed to Russia cannot decently explain. Whether they
like or not, Russia is portraying Clinton and her socialist party as chaotic
and threatening.
Navigating
a grinding economic crisis of low oil prices caused by Saudi Arabia, a U.S.
ally, to destabilize the Russian economy, and battling Obama’s and neocons’ interference
in both Syria and Ukraine, Putin is under pressure.
He
needs the West to lift the sanctions it imposed on Russia allegedly over its
2014 annexation of Crimea from Ukraine. The sanctions have cut off access to
Western credit markets and technology imports. The Russian law banning
homosexual propaganda to children and children seems to have been the real
reason Obama has been using the massive power of the U.S. government to isolate
and boycott Russia, according to Dr. Scott Lively, who said, “advancing the LGBT agenda is the primary reason
that Barack Obama orchestrated the coup to start a civil war in Ukraine.”
The Russian
anti-propaganda law, passed June 11, 2013, was the first truly effective
international counter-measure since the “gay” agenda went global around the
turn of the millennium. Typically, the “gays” characterized the law as hateful
and an incitement to violence, but in doing so they revealed that
propagandizing children is part of their agenda, since the law simply classifies “propaganda of non-traditional sexual
relationships” as material that cannot be distributed among minors and commands
the government to protect children from it.
Just after the
passage of this law Barack Obama did an about-face on the “reset” policy (in
which Russia had been recognized as an equal partner in the world community)
and instead began reviving cold-war rhetoric.
During the Sochi
Olympics of February 2014, BO tried to steer Russia back into line through the usual
media-driven pressure tactics (which don’t work on Russians who endured worse
under the Soviets).
When that didn’t
work BO started the civil war in Ukraine to force Russia into its current
no-win scenario there. US diplomats were caught red-handed in the early stages of this regime change.
In
the WND report “Obama’s final-year foreign-policy
priority: ‘Gay’ rights,”
Michael Brown, a national radio host, WND columnist
and author of “Outlasting the Gay Revolution,” reacted with outrage to the Obama
administration’s imperial LGBT agenda.
“America
is now bullying other nations into accepting our version of morality,” Brown
said. “This makes me ashamed to be an American. How dare we tell other
countries how to define the family! How dare we put pressure on other countries
to embrace gay activism in their children’s schools. How dare we threaten
sovereign nations with serious consequences if they don’t embrace same-sex
relationships and transgender activism.”
African
nations, which have not the capabilities of Russia to withstand formidable
pressures, are suffering the most.
Yet,
sanctions by Obama and Europe are not the only attacks Russia is suffering.
Nikolai
Patrushev, the head of Russia’s Security Council, said earlier this year there
had been a spike in the number of foreign intelligence services making cyber
attacks on Russian government bodies and critical infrastructure.
And
Putin, speaking in February, complained about more than 24 million cyber
attacks against Russia in the past year.
In
Russia, Trump, who has spoken of his desire for better relations with Russia
and praised Putin, is seen as far more likely to cut a sanctions deal with
Russia, while Clinton is regarded as a hawkish neocon against Russia.
In contrast, neocons accuse that actually
Clinton is an ally of Russia, because she allegedly facilitated big companies
like Google to invest in Russia. For them, Google is suspicious because Google
supports Clinton. But where does not Google invest? Google, Microsoft, Apple
and many other big capitalist companies support Clinton and her abortion and
sodomy agenda. What is the point? I have Google and Microsoft services and
products. Is this enough evidence that I am connected to Clinton, abortion and
sodomy? Sadly, there is a lack of reliable alternatives. There is a monopoly of
anti-life and anti-family big companies.
Russians
believe that with Clinton in the White House it would be absolutely impossible
to get the sanctions lifted.
Trump
has already raised neocons’ hackles by saying he would be willing to consider
lifting sanctions.
With information from Reuters and
Charisma.
Portuguese
version of this article: Rússia
é suspeita de ataques cibernéticos contra campanha da candidata pró-sodomia
Hillary Clinton
Source: Last Days Watchman
Recommended Reading:
No comments:
Post a Comment