Terminator’s Dark Feminist Fate
By Julio Severo
Not surprisingly, the movie “Terminator:
Dark Fate” was a total box office failure at its release in November 2019, even
though Arnold Schwarzenegger is a Hollywood icon.
One of the women, a Mexican, was chosen by
Hollywood fate to form a future androgynous army of men and women armed against
these machines.
Macho women, and men as mere subordinates
to Hollywood feminists. As villains, men are disposable. As characters on the
good side — on the side of Hollywood feminists —, they are also disposable,
that is, they are easily terminated. The movie makes it appear that women can by
themselves solve everything on the basis of muscular strength and weapons
against male villains. It is a feminist movie to please feminists’ tantrums and
ideological greed.
It is not surprising the feminist flood in
Terminator, as its producer, James Cameron, is considered a feminist, who takes
pleasure in glorifying women in male roles. He is best known for writing,
directing and producing the leftist environmental movie Avatar (2009).
Terminator was therefore created, with its
masculinized women, according to the image and likeness of the feminism promoted
by Cameron.
Another characteristic in the movie is
profanity. There is a lot of foul language — which is the typical behavior of
left-wingers. But what to expect from a movie by Cameron, a left-winger?
Cameron was raised in a traditional Protestant
home (not open to the supernatural manifestations of the Holy Spirit), and
later he became an atheist who seeks to attack Christianity. According to The
Hollowverse website:
“Cameron has since attempted to debunk any
claims of supernatural miracles in Christianity with his documentary film, The
Lost Tomb of Jesus. The film claims to have found the remains of Jesus Christ,
Mary Magdalene, and their children. Citing the names on the tombs and DNA
evidence, the film seeks to show that Jesus was a regular guy who died and was
not resurrected.”
Politically, Cameron is a left-winger who loves
the militarism
of the neocons in the Republican Party. Arnold Schwarzenegger is the
contrary, but basically the same thing. He, who was the governor of ultra-liberal
California, is a Republican neocon who likes leftism.
Apparently, then, women in Terminator are
neocon left-wing feminists. But why did not Cameron give the central role in
his movie to the queen of neocons, Hillary Clinton? As Cameron, Hillary
is a left-wing who loves the militarism of neocons. When conservative
Republican President George W. Bush invaded Iraq (an action condemned by Trump),
then left-wing Democrat Senator Hillary supported the invasion.
With its feminist flavor, “Terminator:
Dark Fate” does not once present marriage, family and husband and wife as even
remote options for human beings in the future. Nor would it be possible for
Cameron to present marriage in a favorable light, since he himself had 4
divorces.
Although he promotes feminism as a way of
showing that he respects women’s rights, his 4 divorces are more than enough
evidence that he has no respect for them.
His personal relationship with them is as
distorted as his propaganda for them in male roles.
Reality is less generous and politically
correct. It is, in the view of the male and female feminists, cruel. According
to the scenario of the movie itself, the future will have no pharmacies and
pharmaceutical companies to produce “contraceptive” drugs — which often cause
micro-abortions. Women will then have their sexuality day and night free and open
to pregnancy, which is a natural result of sexual activity.
So, the futuristic woman who wants to live
the Hollywood style of free sex will have several pregnancies during her lifetime,
making it impossible for her to live completely as macho soldiers and other
male roles.
A woman who tries to live without marriage
in a future without contraceptives will be a prostitute for several men, with
pregnancies and children from each of them.
Women who choose marriage will be occupied
with the traditional (and fully supported and defended by the Bible) role of
caring for their husbands, children and home.
“Terminator: Dark Fate” twists the role of
women. If women could be macho by punching men and leading armies of men, God
would not have created Eve for Adam. He would have created another Adam.
If men were virtually disposable, as the movie
shows, God would have created another Eve for Eve, completely dispensing with
Adam.
In the ideologically charged view of
Hollywood, women can play the role of boxers very well. And to elevate women to
male positions, Hollywood is weakening or even terminating men from all their
traditional male roles, especially leadership. For Hollywood, the time has come
for women to lead the world in everything, including muscular strength and
military actions.
However, God is not dependent on Hollywood
and its spiritual and moral failures. Before Hollywood, there was God — Jesus
Christ — and long after Hollywood disappears into the dust of oblivion, God
will continue as King of the Universe.
In Hollywood’s dying vision, women are
neocons, real war machines with no time for home, husband and children, but
with plenty of time to have sex with men and punch them. But in God’s view,
women can play the role of wife and mother very well without time to be
neocons.
“Terminator: Dark Fate” had a deserved
failure. It terminated the reality of the differences between women and men. It
terminated the reality of marriage for the future. And in the process, it terminated
itself as a work of public utility. It has become useless.
I am not surprised, as its director, who
loves feminism and divorces against women, has a particular war against
Christianity. In fact, the whole of Hollywood is at war with Christianity.
No matter how much Hollywood and its terminators
fight against marriage and the differences between men and women to terminate
the biological reality that God created, the Creator is greater.
It is impossible to terminate what has
already been determined by God. Hollywood will pass away, but God and His Word
will remain forever.
Recommended Reading on Hollywood:
Recommended Reading on feminism:
No comments:
Post a Comment