Voyage to the Bottom of Emasculation
By Julio Severo
One of the most famous and successful TV
series was “Voyage to the Bottom of the Sea,” with a cast of commanders and
sailors 100 percent male.
The 2018
movie Megalodon has a submarine with an all-female crew. As all feminist
movies, it was a failure and sheer boredom.
A female crew in military submarines in
fantasy and in reality makes no sense. But feminist pressure does not allow
anymore all-male crews in military submarines, and this same pressure does not
allow the revelation of what happens when females are in a military environment
that is traditionally male.
While in “Voyage to the Bottom of the Sea”
only military men did daring deep trips, in “Voyage to the Bottom of Emasculation”
men and women now do such trips, but only men are emasculated. Only women are entitled
to masculinization.
Emasculation means castration and the loss
of male power and masculinity. Masculinization means make more masculine or
male.
It is not natural to emasculate men for
the sake of feminism and socialism. It is not natural to masculinize women for
the sake of feminism and socialism. It is not natural to put in the military women
and lesbians for the sake of feminism and socialism.
While “Voyage to the Bottom of the Sea”
had an end, the bottom of the sea, the emasculation of men and the
masculinization of women seem to have no end. It is a cultural voyage with no
bottom.
In fantasy at least women escape the realities
of a life among military men. But in real life, there is no escape.
In fantasy, women are militarily as strong
as men as. In reality, they are not. Leaked
Army document reveals 84 percent of women have FAILED the new rigorous combat
fitness test.
In fantasy, inclusion of women among
military men poses absolutely no problem. In reality, inclusion
of women and homosexuals has brought serious sex problems in the U.S. military
as sexual assaults are getting worse every year with no end in sight.
In 1991, 36 women fell
pregnant aboard the Navy ship Acadia that served in Persian Gulf.
Statistics of 2016 from the Navy reveals
that 16 of 100 women serving among men fell pregnant.
Because of integration of women with men
in the Navy, military ships are known as “Love Boats.”
Even in Israel, which boasts of a socialist
system where women are fully integrated with men in the military, sexual realities
have prevailed.
The number of legal abortions rises in the Israeli Army as coexistence of male
and female soldiers has increased their sexual activity.
In “Voyage to the Bottom of the Sea,” with
an all-male crew in the submarine, there was no sex, no pregnancy and there was
much action.
In Megalodon, with an all-female crew in
the submarine, there was no sex, no pregnancy, but much boredom. And if a man
were introduced in such female environment, there would be another kind of
action.
Even though male sailors would love to
have female sailors near, not as fighting pals, but for the obvious reasons,
what is the usefulness, except for sex, of a military female crew integrated with
military male crew? To distract or entertain men?
If America in the early 1960s was so emasculated
as she is today, “Voyage to the Bottom of the Sea” would have been a “love
submarine.” Yet, love means today free sex. Real love does not use women for
fun. Real love protects babies from abortion and never puts women in risky
situations, especially combat situations. Real love never integrates women with
men in the military.
What integrates women with men in the
military is not love. It is socialism. In Israel, such socialist integration
has produced increased sex and abortion in the military. In the U.S., Navy ships
are “love boats.”
What cost is society paying for emasculating
men for the sake of socialist integration?
The pressure to conform to socialism is so
trendy the Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro, known for defending some
conservative causes, has made a point to have as the pilot of his presidential plane the first military
woman to do it. She is a captain in the Brazilian Air Force. It was a
strange choice, because Bolsonaro has filled his administration with “traditionalists.”
For most people, traditionalism would mean to protect men and women in their
traditional sex roles. It would mean to reject women as military pilots.
Yet, “traditionalists” in the Bolsonaro
administration are not connected to Christian traditionalism. They
are connected to the Traditionalist School, whose most prominent member was
Julius Evola, who was an adviser and guru for the Italian fascist dictator
Benito Mussolini.
This kind of “traditionalism” does not
defeat socialism and feminism. But evangelical conservatism, when it was predominant
in America, defeated it.
Without Christian conservatism, how will
America protect her military from becoming “love” boats and submarines of emasculated
men and masculinized women?
Source: Last Days Watchman
Recommended Reading on feminism:
No comments:
Post a Comment