Beware of False Conservatives! Neocons and Their Leftist Mistreatment of Christians
By Julio
Severo
I received
a report
yesterday from Peter LaBarbera, one of the major Christian voices against the
gay agenda in America, that he was detained by customs agents when he entered
Canada. They did an intense search of his phone, laptop and belongings.
No,
no. LaBarbera is not an Islamic terrorist. According to the Gaystapo and the
politically-correct mob, he is worse: he is “homophobic” — a vague term that
can be loosely interpreted to refer to criminals or merely Christians quoting
Bible verses condemning homosexual sins.
The Canadian
agents confiscated from LaBarbera a DVD copy of a new Russian documentary
called “Sodom” as potential “hate propaganda” in
violation of Canadian law banning material or people who could potentially
“incite hate” based on “sexual orientation.”
“Sodom,”
which features an interview with American pro-family leader Scott Lively of
Defend the Family International, just shows the traditional Christian stance
that homosexuality is a sexual perversion.
LaBarbera
was entering Canada to attend his own trial in a court because his peaceful protest
April 12 against abortion and sodomy at a Canadian public university was
considered “hate.”
Ironically,
the Canadian government that has mistreated LaBarbera is the conservative
government of Stephen Harper, in power for many years. Canadian Christians had
voted for him to avoid mistreatment by the Left against Christians who oppose
abortion and sodomy, and now they suffer a leftist treatment in the hands of a
conservative government.
LaBarbera’s Friend
I
spent my day yesterday with an American friend of LaBarbera. He was the
director of a Christian pro-family organization in a U.S. state.
Seeing
the relentless advance of the homosexual agenda and its advocates, he was determined
to fight it with no compromise.
But
some well-funded “conservative” voices in his state thought that a compromise
was vitally important: “since pro-family organizations could not allow
homosexual ‘marriage,’ at least they should let homosexual activists have civil
unions.” My friend correctly understood that civil unions were a significant
stepping stone for higher claims, including homosexual “marriage.” So he
resisted these voices, coming especially from groups connected to neocons.
Then
came the battle between Barack Obama and Mitt Romney in the last U.S.
presidential election. The same voices said, “Romney is the only conservative
option to defeat Obama!” Conservative? My friend and other real conservatives
knew that the first state to legalize homosexual “marriage” in the U.S. was
Massachusetts, under Governor Mitt Romney, who became the first U.S. governor
to pass a law turning sodomy into official marriage.
According
to Scott Lively, homosexual
“marriage” was the last lost battle before the Flood.
Satan and Beelzebub
Alan
Keyes, a conservative Catholic, denounced, in an excellent WND article, that
the choice between Obama and Romney was actually “A
choice between Satan and Beelzebub.”
But
neocons won. They said that it was non-sense not to support Romney. The
priority, they said, was to defeat Obama.
My friend
was removed from the headship of the pro-family organization because Christian
conservatives were misled into choosing Beelzebub to defeat Satan… And while he
mentioned to me the LaBarbera report on his detainment for “homophobia,” he
told how powerful neocons are among conservatives in America.
Neocons
have much more political power and money than most Christians who engage in
pro-family battles just for defending their families. But neocons have “higher”
interests, especially ultranationalistic interests at the expense of moral and
Christian values.
What
happens when Christian conservatives vote for the neocons’ conservatives? Just
look at the “conservative” government of Canada and its leftist mistreatment of
Peter LaBarbera.
“Conservatives” in the United Kingdom
In the
United Kingdom, Christians also vote for conservatives to protect themselves
from this leftist mistreatment. But what have they got?
The British
government under David Cameron, of the Conservative Party, has passed a law
transforming sodomy into official marriage.
First,
the political “conservative” talk was: “let’s fight against homosexual ‘marriage,’
but at least let homosexual activists get civil unions.” Next: “Now, let them
get homosexual ‘marriage’!” This is not conservative. This is neocon, or false
conservative.
Now,
according to WND,
British homosexuals are suing to force churches to marry them!
Everything began with a “conservative” government compromising, compromising
and compromising.
The next
talk will be: “homosexual ‘marriage’ is not important. Conservatives should focus
on more important subjects.” Important for neocons, of course.
Both
Canada and the United Kingdom are major references for our understanding that
to vote for conservatives (or false conservatives) is not a solution. It may become
another serious problem.
Neocons and Christian Persecution
The
British “conservative” government follows neocon interests, not conservative
interests. According to Murad
Makhmudov and Lee Jay Walker, Christian persecution follows neocon ambitions,
which have inflamed torture and murder of Christians in Kosovo, Libya, Iraq,
Syria and other nations. They point that the U.S. and the United Kingdom are
the main tools for facilitating the neocons’ Christian persecution.
So
neocons are capable of misleading conservative Christians into choosing their “conservative”
candidates. Next, they are equally capable of imposing leftist mistreatment of
Christians in their countries while at the same time stimulating torture and
murder of Christians abroad.
Even
so, neocons have been hijacking conservative feelings everywhere, misleading
their victims that their candidates are better than their enemies.
In
the recent Brazilian presidential election, U.S. neocons were actively engaged,
as I told in my article “Obama
Strategist in the Brazilian Presidential Campaign.” Their candidate was
pro-gay agenda, but Brazilian conservatives were misled to think: “The homosexual
agenda should not be important now.” The important thing was to defeat neocons’
enemies.
In
this case, as many Brazilians told me, if Obama was with neocons, he is a hero!
I do
not understand why neocons are called new conservatives, because they are
willing to support any cause, conservative or leftist, that advances the U.S.
supremacy.
Alan
Keyes is right. Leftist candidates do not deserve our support. And definitely neocons’
candidates do not deserve it too.
Jesus and the Wicked Rulers
For a
real conservative Christian, there is another point. When only the wicked rule,
Christians should focus their attention only on spiritual priorities: the
preaching of the Gospel and the salvation of sinners.
When
the Roman Empire dominated Israel, Jesus never instigated his disciples about political
issues. Of course, if there is a candidate who is not anti-family, we are free
to support him. But political ambitions were never Jesus’ priority or concern. He
was never obsessed about supporting a wicked ruler against another wicked ruler.
In fact, he never instigated his disciples in these obsessions.
When
political strategists manipulate conservatives, I think in LaBarbera being
detained by a conservative government for his Christian stance against abortion
and homosexuality. I think in my American friend being removed from the
headship of a pro-family organization because well-funded neocons think that
the supremacy of the U.S. politics should take a precedence over pro-family
issues too. I think in British churches being sued to marry homosexuals. And I
think in Christians in Syria and Iraq being beheaded because of the U.S. and U.K. neocon
funding to the Islamic cutthroats.
By
this point, we should have learnt something from Jesus’ example and the neocons’
deception.
Portuguese
version of this article: Cuidado com os falsos conservadores! Neocons
e suas crueldades esquerdistas contra os cristãos
Source: Last Days Watchman
Recommended Reading:
No comments:
Post a Comment