Top Anti-Russia Journalist Presents a Dossier Suggesting Trump May Be a Russian Agent
By Julio
Severo
Anti-Russia
activists had a powerful argument 30 years ago. There was the Soviet Union,
ruled by ruthless communist dictators, and there was a democratic America ruled
by conservative evangelical Ronald Reagan, who prized freedom and Christian
values. While the Soviet Union praised atheism, Reagan did exactly the contrary
by proclaiming 1983 as the “Year of the Bible.”
 |
| Donald Trump |
Today,
the Soviet Union does not exist anymore, Russia is more conservative and prizes
its Orthodox Christianity and America, which is the largest Protestant nation
in the world, is less conservative and less Christian. Today, America has no
Reagan, but just a Kenyan-born, crypto-Islamic and open homosexualist
president, who cannot be exposed by his deceptions and socialism because any
criticism of him is treated as “racism.”
So 30
years ago are gone and Russia and America have changed. But anti-Russia
activists have not followed these changes. They remain tucked in the Cold War
mentality.
In a
recent report
titled “Is Trump a Russian agent? Top Kremlinologist presents a
tantalising and disturbing dossier on why the presidential hopeful could have
closer links to the Kremlin than it may appear,” DailyMail listed a number of
reasons why top anti-Russia journalist Edward Lucas thinks that Russia is the
biggest threat and why U.S. presidential candidate Donald Trump might be a
“Russian agent.”
Months
ago, I was wondering why anti-Russia activists in Brazil were not accusing
Trump of being a KGB agent. I addressed their inconsistency in my article “Is
Trump a KGB Agent?”
I do
not need to wonder anymore. Lucas asked and answered, “‘Is Donald Trump a Russian
agent?’ While the answer may be no, he is certainly what the original Soviet
leader Lenin called a ‘useful idiot’ — referring to those in the West who
ignored mass murder and chose to support the great Communist project.”
By
this question and answer, a reader would understand that Lucas sees Russia as
communist and he wants an anticommunist American candidate to fight Russia. Of
course, Trump is not his candidate.
Then
he complains, “Russian spies have also broken into computers related to the
Democratic Party and Hillary Clinton four times, stealing a trove of documents
that cast an unflattering light on the party’s internal machinations. They
have also gained access to the emails of Mrs Clinton…”
So “communists” (in his Cold War
mentality) gained access to the emails of Mrs Clinton. So is she an
anticommunist? Is she against the progressive and socialist ideology? Is she
against abortion and sodomy, which are a top priority of the progressive and
socialist ideology?
In
his book “God and Hillary Clinton,” published by HarperCollins, conservative author
Paul Kengor portrays Clinton as a progressive Methodist. Progressive is another
term for socialist.
Why then does Lucas see “communism”
in Russia, but he does not see it in Clinton?
To
confirm his anti-Russia bias, Lucas mentions that “former CIA boss Michael
Morell said that he had ‘no doubt’ Putin viewed Trump as an ‘unwitting agent.’”
Yet, he
does not mention that Morell praises Muslims in CIA, especially a
Muslim who for ten years, under Bush and Obama, was director of the CIA’s
Counterterrorism Center. He does not also mention that Morell is endorsing
Hillary.
So to fight “communism” in Russia
anti-Russia activists are supposed to praise Muslims in CIA and endorse
socialist Hillary, who is actively pro-abortion and pro-sodomy?
To prove Trump’s “Soviet” ties,
Edward Lucas presents a list of economic ventures between Russians and Trump
over the years. He points how Trump is receiving Russian money. He does not
seem to care that these were capitalist ventures — highly hated by real
communists. He does not seem to care about the reality. Trump is not poor. He
is a billionaire. He does not need money from anyone. If he is receiving money
from Russian for capitalist ventures, he is just showing that he is a
capitalist, and Russians are equally showing that they are also capitalists!
Even so,
citing the Washington Post, Lucas said, “Since the 1980s, Trump and his family
members have made numerous trips to Moscow in search of business opportunities,
and they have relied on Russian investors to buy their properties around the
world.”
He
also said, “Trump’s son, Donald Jnr, boasted to a property industry conference
in 2008: ‘Russians make up a pretty disproportionate cross-section of a lot of
our assets.’ In the same speech, he said that he had visited Russia six times
in the previous 18 months.”
His
anti-Trump criticism is laced with a number of mentions of “Soviets,” “KGB” and
other Cold War adjectives.
His
profoundly negative dossier, as mentioned in DailyMail to denounce Trump and
his “Soviet” ties, was written to torpedo Trump’s presidential campaign and
help Hillary.
Lucas
is bitterly critical of Trump because, as he said, “Trump is friendly to Russia.”
He
complains, “Another damning factor in Trump’s relations with Russia is the
composition of his inner circle. Paul Manafort, his election campaign
chairman, has benefited from multi-million-dollar business deals with
pro-Russian oligarchs. He was a close adviser to Viktor Yanukovych, the
disgraced Ukrainian president who was toppled in 2014.”
Lucas fails to mention that the
democratically-elect Yanukovych was overthrown by a revolution backed by the
leftist billionaire George Soros, Obama and his leftist administration and many
prominent neocons. U.S.
conservatives denounced this coup. So if Manafort, the Trump campaign
chairman, was on Yanukovych’ side, he was against Obama and his neocons. Is
this so bad for Lucas?
Obama,
Soros and neocons wanted a Ukraine open to the sodomy agenda. Does Lucas think
that this is ok? I do not know Manafort’s reasons to be against the Ukrainian
coup, but he was right.
Lucas
also complains about other members of Trump’s inner circle, “Even more
startling is the behaviour of one of America’s top spymasters, General Michael
Flynn, who now advises Donald Trump. A former head of the Pentagon’s in-house
intelligence service, the Defence Intelligence Agency, the wiry, crop-haired
spy chief stunned his former colleagues by visiting Moscow in December 2015,
where he sat close to Mr Putin at a dinner… Another foreign policy adviser in
the Trump campaign is Carter Page, who has spent much of his career in Russia… He
justifies Russia’s invasion and occupation of Ukraine, dismissing that
country’s pro-democracy revolution and pro-Western leadership.”
According
to Lucas, Trump is qualified to be a “Russian agent,” not a U.S. president. He
said,
When Mr Putin
wrote an article lambasting America’s role as the world’s policeman, Trump
called it a masterpiece.
In 2007, he
praised Putin for rebuilding Russia.
A year later he
added, in a reference to the then President: “He does his work well; much
better than our [President George W.] Bush.”
Trump praises
the taciturn former KGB man who runs Russia for his leadership.
Then
Lucas says, “What the Russian leader wants to do is to help him — notably by
undermining Mrs Clinton, the only person who can keep Trump out of the White
House.”
Hillary
is the only person also who can keep homosexuality as top priority in the U.S.
foreign policy, which she, under Obama, had been doing as State Secretary.
There
were also many dealings between Hillary, when she was the U.S. State Secretary,
and Russia. But perhaps Lucas favors Hillary because after the Obama
administration began its sanctions against Russia over a Russian law banning
homosexual propaganda to children and adolescents, the dealings stopped. But
Trump has never stopped his efforts of friendship with Russia.
What
is worrying and enraging Lucas is not the U.S. and its recent socialist
administration, which has put homosexuality as top priority in their foreign
policies, including imposing the homosexual doctrine on other nations. They
even tried to force Russia to submit to it.
What
is worrying and enraging Lucas is the prospect of a Trump administration
seeking friendlier relations with the current conservative and Orthodox
Christian Russia.
I do
not know if Trump will survive the onslaught of criticism and pressure from
neocons, left-wing Hillary Clinton and other anti-Russia activists as Edward
Lucas, but if the times have changed, and Russia and America have changed,
Trump is a fresh air away from the moldy Cold War atmosphere.
I
would like Trump to get also a fresh air away from the moldy gay ideology
atmosphere. In this point, he could learn a lot from Russia.
Weak-minded
simple people could equate anti-Russian views with anti-communism, but this is
far away from reality.
In
2014 I
attended a pro-family meeting at the Kremlin, in Moscow, with
several prominent pro-family leaders from the United States.
The
Americans were under threat from feminist, homosexualist and left-wing
Americans, who wanted the U.S. State Department to investigate them for
violating the sanctions the Obama administration was imposing on Russia.
No, these were not anticommunist
Americans threatening “communist” Americans visiting “communist” Russians in
Moscow. These were socialist Americans threatening pro-family Americans who
were visiting pro-family Russians in Moscow.
Edward Lucas and other anti-Russia
activists do not stop to think that if their case against Russia is over
communism, why support Hillary Clinton, whose policies are more socialist (including
a strident abortion and sodomy advocacy) than the modern Russia? If they cared
about socialism, they would admit that socialists are in the White House and
that these socialists are against Russia.
This
is about nationalism, which is strongly anti-Russia among conservative and
socialist Americans, but it is not strongly anti-Islam, and Donald Trump is radically
changing the ideological nationalistic landscape shared equally by conservative
and leftist Americans. Neocons, whose radical nationalism dominates the
conservative and socialist camps in America, are avid anti-Russia troublemakers
and warmongers.
If anti-Russia activists need a
candidate to keep the Obama sanctions against Russia, Trump is not their
candidate. Hillary is. But just remember: both Hillary and Obama are
socialists!
The
simple message seems to be: to be an American communist is OK, but it is not OK
to be a capitalist or communist Russian.
Another
message seems to be: It is OK to be Muslim, but is not OK to be Russian.
Therefore, the ideological fight
against Russia today is about irrational nationalism, not rational anticommunism.
I am anti-communism, anti-socialism and anti-leftism, and this is the reason I
am against Obama and Hillary. This is the reason I supported Reagan and opposed
the Soviet Union. In that time, I contacted the U.S. Embassy in Brazil
expressing my support to Reagan, and I sent encouraging letters to Christian
prisoners in Soviet camps.
As a
pro-family activist, my reason to support Russia today is its incomparable law
banning homosexual propaganda to children and adolescents. This reason also
includes the fact that Russia has been defending traditional values in the
United Nations. But pro-family values do not seem the reason Trump has been the
biggest American cheerleader for Russia. Trump’s reason seems exclusively
capitalist or economic: Russia has been a very good partner for his capitalist
ventures.
If embracing
capitalist ventures makes you a capitalist, what is hindering Lucas from seeing
Russia as capitalist? And if endorsing an avid supporter (Hillary) of a very socialist
gay and abortion agenda makes you a socialist, should Lucas be spared?
So
Lucas shares more ideological interests with socialists than Trump does.
The
accusation of anti-Russian activists that Trump is receiving Russian money because
he needs it to fund his presidential campaign is ridiculous because Trump is
not poor. He is a billionaire, and he makes business with anyone, Russian or
not.
In the Cold War days, you were a
Russian agent if you advocated socialist interests. Now if you do not support socialist
Hillary Clinton and her abortion and sodomy agenda, you are a Russian agent too!
If it is important for America to make
sodomy a priority and massively impose it on other nations, it is equally
important for conservative Christians to support nations resisting this stupid
imposition.
The Cold War does not exist
anymore, but its moldy mentality is making its adherents crazy and irrational
in regard to what is more important for pro-Reagan conservative Christians:
conservative and Christian values.
The
only thing worrying me is not neocons’ obsessions or anti-Russia concerns. It
is the gay agenda and what it does to persecute Christians, deface families,
destroy children’s innocence and demolish society. Hillary is sure to aggravate
the homosexualist threats against Christians and families. And what about Trump,
what is he going to do?
He
has allied himself to Peter Thiel, the PayPal
owner who has persecuted Christians. In Russia, Thiel could never do
it.
Trump
is better than Hillary in many respects, but in the homosexualist respect, he
needs to listen and imitate Russia exactly as Russia should have listened and
imitated Reagan’s America 30 years ago.
Portuguese
version of this article: Importante jornalista anti-Rússia
apresenta dossiê sugerindo que Trump pode ser um agente russo
Source: Last Days Watchman
Recommended Reading:
No comments:
Post a Comment