US Ambassador Says She Will Keep Beating Up on Russia
By Julio
Severo
The
U.S. ambassador to the United Nations says there’s no question Russia was
involved in the U.S. presidential election and insists President Donald Trump
would fully support strong action against Russia once investigations are
complete.
Nikki Haley |
Even
though the former Obama administration had charged Russia of interference
during the 2016 U.S. campaign to help Trump and had imposed several sanctions
on Russia, Haley has shown the same willingness: she wants to expand the Obama
sanctions on Russia. She supports U.S.
interference in Ukraine against Russia. In contrast, Trump had not
supported such interference last year.
She has
shown dissatisfaction with the alleged Russian involvement in the U.S.
elections, but she seems to ignore the U.S. involvement in the elections of
other nations. John Perkins, in his book “Confessions of an Economic Hit Man,”
has said that U.S. intelligence agencies have rigged elections in other nations.
According
to Joseph Farah, WND (WorldNetDaily) chief, even Israel did not escape from
U.S. interference in Israeli elections. Farah said,
“Barack Obama used U.S. taxpayer money openly to influence the election of its
best ally in the Middle East, Israel.” He added, “The late Sen. Ted Kennedy
actually asked for the Soviet Union’s help in defeating Ronald Reagan’s
re-election effort in 1988. Where were the scowls of outrage back then?”
While
30 years ago only conservative Republicans were rightly beating up on the
Soviet Union over leftist interference, today Obama’s party and Republicans are
beating up on Russia over alleged conservative interference on behalf of Trump.
Haley
said, “We don’t want any country involved in our elections, ever. We need to be
very strong on that.”
So she
does not want other nations to do to the U.S. what the U.S. has done to other
nations, including Israel. But has actually Russia rigged U.S. elections on
behalf of Trump?
Trump
himself has said he believes Russian operatives hacked Democratic Party emails
during the election. If he is right, Russians may have helped to elect him.
U.S. intelligence agencies report that Russia tried to help Trump`s campaign
effort.
And
now does Haley intend, as Obama did, to punish Russia for helping Trump?
When
asked if she believes Trump should publicly take a harder stance against Russia,
she answered: “Of course, he’s got a lot of things he’s doing.”
Traditionally,
in the modern U.S. politics, neocons
are adamant that the U.S. should always keep an anti-Russian stance,
especially with its Islamic alliances against Russia. In his campaign, Trump
distanced himself from neocons and suggested that the best way for the U.S. was
to have an alliance with Russia against Islamic terror.
A
Russian-American alliance would be something very positive, because modern
Russia under Putin has embraced more traditional values, championing in the
United Nations pro-life and pro-family values, including an exemplary law in
Russia banning homosexual propaganda to children and adolescents. Even the U.S.
has no law to protect its children and adolescents against such propaganda.
Trump
is having a very hard time to implement his campaign discourse against neocons.
Whenever he tries to reach out to Russia in friendship and partnership, neocons
in the mainstream media and the establishment make a political mess to him. The
American Left, which loved the Soviet Union, has shown abundant willingness to antagonize
and provoke Russia at every turn.
Complying
with the pressure from neocons and the Obama party, Trump
has been replacing his pro-Russian advisers with anti-Russian advisers.
Over
50 years ago, evangelists
warned people that if John F. Kennedy were elected, the pope would
be in the White House. Kennedy was the first Catholic U.S. president. The
Kennedy clan was notorious for leftist connections and mafia ties. If they and
the Democratic Party could have had such ties, why cannot U.S. conservatives,
including Trump, have a partnership with a conservative Russia?
Why
can the U.S. have ties with terrorist nations, but not with a conservative
Russia?
Actually,
Haley, who considers herself an evangelical, has been beating up on Russia in
her inflammatory speeches in the United Nations. But she has not been beating
up on Saudi Arabia, which is the main sponsor of Islamic terror around the
world. Her behavior is similar to Obama’s behavior.
With
the Obama administration, Saudi Arabia funded ISIS, which has committed a
genocide of Syrian and Iraqi Christians. Russia has fought ISIS.
Why
does Haley beat up on those fighting ISIS, but she does not beat up on those
helping ISIS?
With
information from the Associated Press.
Portuguese
version of this article: Embaixadora dos EUA
diz que vai continuar batendo na Rússia
Source: Last Days Watchman
Recommended Reading:
No comments:
Post a Comment