Fall of anti-neocon advisers hinders Trump from pursuing his promised focus of partnership with Russia against Islamic terror; new neocon advisers urge the old, traditional focus against Russia
By Julio
Severo
U.S.
President Donald Trump is losing his war
against neocons, whose focus is partnership with Islamists against
Russia. In his campaign, Trump wanted to change the focus, with a partnership
with Russia against Islamic terror. But with the fall of General Michael Flynn,
formerly appointed by him as a national security adviser, and other close aides
who were supporting him for such partnership, neocons are having the upper hand
they had in the Obama and Bush administrations.
 |
| Fiona Hill, Trump’s new anti-Russia adviser, formerly a member of a left-wing institution |
The
media has been using such anti-Russia leaks as a battering ram against Trump
and his administration, with daily accusations of Trump and his aides involved
with Russia.
It
seems that Trump will have no freedom to rule while he tries to head for his
dreamed partnership. The only choice left to him is to leave and walk away from
any thought of a partnership with Russians against Islamic terror.
And
Trump is beginning to walk away.
The
new attitude suggests the rising influence of a new set of neocon advisers who want
to keep the old, traditional stance against Russia, including Defense Secretary
Jim Mattis and new national security adviser H.R. McMaster. During his first
meeting with National Security Council staff, McMaster described Russia as a
country that threatens the current world order.
Despite
Trump’s repeated expressions of admiration for Putin, days ago he hired Fiona
Hill for senior position as a national security adviser. Hill, a scholar from
the left-wing Brookings Institution, has written a leading book lambasting Russian
President Vladimir Putin.
The
new advisers are an effort of the Trump administration to please the press and
neocons in their constant barrage of accusations that the Trump administration
is friendly to Russia.
While
Trump initially hired pro-Russian advisers to help him in his intended
partnership, the new anti-Russian advisers show a pressure to follow the tracks
of Obama’s and Bush’s foreign policy.
Trump,
who spoke favorably about Putin throughout the campaign, is under such pressure
that his new course is to follow the old course of Obama and Bush.
Trump
has been trailed by questions about his possible ties to Russia for months. He
had an unusually friendly posture toward Russia, praising Putin’s leadership
and, at times, appearing to echo Kremlin positions on Ukraine and other
matters. He had also repeatedly said that it would be better for the U.S. and
Russia to have a stronger relationship, particularly in fighting terrorism.
But
Trump’s initial efforts to implement his ideas brought the neocon hell against
him and his administration. And now there have been some signs of his
administration taking the old, traditional approach of Obama and Bush.
U.N.
Ambassador Nikki
Haley hit Russia hard last month over its actions in Ukraine, saying
the Obama administration’s sanctions imposed after Russia’s annexation of
Crimea in 2014 will remain in place until Crimea is returned to Ukraine. Her
remarks came amid speculation that Trump is changing his intentions towards
Russia.
Yet, Russia
was not the only nation warned by the Trump administration. On the same day Haley
condemned Russia, the Trump administration condemned Israel’s settlements.
According to the Jerusalem Post,
“The White House
warned Israel on Thursday — in a surprising statement — to cease settlement
announcements that are ‘unilateral’ and ‘undermining’ of President Donald
Trump’s effort to forge Middle East peace.”
How
to explain Trump’s change?
According
to Dr. Scott Livey, “Obama has set up a shadow government” against the Trump
administration.
He
said,
At the root of
the Obama strategy and propaganda is the false premise that the Russian
government is an evil America-hating regime that seeks to weaken or control the
United States through James Bondesqe subversion and spycraft. Back in the 1960s
and 70, when the liberals were politically aligned with the Russians, the
Russian-based Soviet Communist bloc WAS in fact an evil empire, and DID work to
subvert America. Indeed, the Cultural Marxism dominant in our university system
and mainstream media attest to their success. Today, however, the Russian
Federation is socially and fiscally conservative and strongly anti-Marxist.
Today’s primary
cultural influence [in Russia] is not Marxism (as it is in the Democrat Party
USA) but Orthodox Christianity.
Ideologically
and culturally the Russian people are the closest match to American
conservatives and populists in the entire world, and it is only the constant
Obama/McCain/Soros/MSM/Deep State anti-Russian propaganda that keeps the
Americans from seeing it. Yet, I fault the conservatives and populists
themselves in this, since the very people they’re trusting for news on such
matters as Syria, Ukraine, the US election and Russia itself are the one’s they
know for a fact ALWAYS lie about cultural and spiritual issues here at home.
I can’t speak to
Putin’s character pro or con, but I know he’s a more faithful representative of
the will of the Russian people than any of our US presidents from HW Bush through
Obama, and I certainly don’t trust the people who are poisoning western minds
against him. If anything, their hostility to Putin should enhance his
credibility among conservatives.
Lively
said that a strong US-Russia partnership on global issues could solve problems,
including ISIS and al-Qaeda, and that “The world would be a far better place
under such an overtly Judeo-Christian alliance than what we have now under the
greedy, Godless globalists.”
Perhaps
the most important point in Lively’s message is that he challenged Trump to “rehire
General Flynn and put him in charge of draining the swamp in the federal
bureaucracy.”
Flynn
has been critical of Obama’s and Bush’s approach to focus on Russia, not the
Islamic terrorism, as the global threat.
By
rejecting Flynn, what does the Trump administration want? To follow Bush?
In
the recent show of lesbian host Ellen Degeneres, former President George W.
Bush warned
Trump to “stand up to Putin” and spoke about his friendship with Michelle
Obama, which surprised other people.
In
his administration, Bush was unable to stand up to Saudi Arabia, even though
most 9/11 terrorists were Saudis.
His
focus was not to threaten Islamic terrorists. In fact, his policies actually threatened
Russia and Middle East Christians.
The
Bush’s invasion of Iraq paved the way for Obama and Hillary to create ISIS,
which slaughtered thousands and thousands of Christians. In his pre-election
campaign, Trump recognized that Obama created ISIS and he criticized Bush’s
invasion of Iraq.
Like
it or not, Russia is the only nation effectively fighting ISIS. And a recent
WND (WorldNetDaily) report confirmed what we already knew: Russia is
protecting Christians and fighting Islamic terror.
What is evident is that left-wing
Americans do not want in any way U.S. conservatives to have contact and
friendship with the conservative Russia.
If
Trump, under the pressure from neocons and his new anti-Russia advisers, wants
to follow Obama’s and Bush’s ways, which brought blood-shedding of Christians,
he will be in the wrong side of history, as Obama and Bush were.
Even
though Trump had no conservative history, his anti-neocon speech was fresh air
in the U.S. foreign policy. His first advisers, who were overthrown by
malicious leaks, would have helped him to fulfill his speech. The new advisers
will fulfill the old course.
The
overthrown advisers, especially Flynn, were going to bring a new and necessary
vision. The new advisers are keepers of the old vision, to protect old,
unnecessary and obsolete interests, which have been bloodily costly to
Christians.
To
live up to his speech, Trump would need to fire the neocon advisers and choose
more men like Michael Flynn.
Christians,
especially in the Middle East, are mortally tired of the U.S. foreign policy,
which sacrifices them and does not threaten Islamic terrorism and its main
sponsor, Saudi Arabia.
The
U.S. and Russia are two Christian powers able to stand up to Islamic nations sponsoring
terror and genocide of Christians. Their partnership should be top priority. Their
disunion is an Islamic dream that is a nightmare for Christians living under
Islamic threat.
By
following Trump’s speech in his campaign, I hoped him to walk away from Obama
and his policies. Yet, Trump
is keeping Obama’s homosexual imperialism.
Russia
under Putin became a shining conservative model with its Obama-hated law
banning homosexual propaganda to children and adolescents.
Russia
has made a global difference against the gay agenda. Obama made a global difference
on behalf of this agenda, and Trump is keeping the Obama way.
Yet,
Obama, who hated the Russian law, loved friendship with Saudi Arabia, which
kills homosexuals.
Trump
has never praised the Russian law, has kept Obama’s homosexual imperialism and sent
his CIA director to reward Saudi Arabia for fighting Islamic terror,
when actually Russia is fighting Islamic terror and protecting Christians.
The
U.S.-Saudi partnership is not a disaster only to Russia, but to Christians in
the Middle East.
A
U.S. hegemony at the service of Islam and the homosexual imperialism is not
healthy to the nations, especially to Christians and their natural conservatism.
Let
us pray that God may raise new advisers to Trump and that he may rehire Michael
Flynn.
With
information from the Associated Press and DailyMail.
Portuguese
version of this article: Queda de assessores anti-neocon
impede Trump de seguir seu prometido foco de parceria com Rússia contra o
terrorismo islâmico; novos assessores neocons instigam foco velho e tradicional
contra a Rússia
Source: Last Days Watchman
Recommended Reading:
Posts
No comments :
Post a Comment