What Does Right Wing Watch, of People for the American Way, Have Against Me?
By Julio
Severo
Right
Wing Watch, a major American socialist group, has for several times, since 2014
(see: People
for the American Way’s Leftist Diatribe Against a Brazilian Conservative), blacklisted my articles
published by the conservative website BarbWire, and it has “exposed” them to
its U.S. left-wing audience for politically incorrect views.
My latest BarbWire article
blacklisted by Right Wing Watch is titled “The
Transcendent Power of Neoconservatism in the U.S. Media and among Left-Wingers
and Right-Wingers.”
Right Wing Watch said on September 21, 2018:
“Finally, Julio Severo laments that ‘sadly, [John] McCain was not killed
in one of the many wars he helped to provoke.’”
Interestingly, Right Wing Watch is
sympathizing with a Republican warmonger. Such defense confirms my argument
that U.S. left-wingers and right-wingers are united under the neocon ideology.
McCain helped provoke many wars that left an untold number of Christians raped,
tortured and slaughtered. If innocent people suffered because of his sins, why
could not he suffer for his own sins?
Can you imagine Democrats loving a
Republican? Left-wingers, including Obama, just loved McCain.
Why doesn’t Right Wing Watch think
that neoconservartism is a threat and exposes my attack on it?
“After
all, what has Right Wing Watch against me and other conservatives? You are a
well-funded left-wing Goliath, and I am just a small David in God’s hands. May
God deliver you from your left-wing delusion.”
Right Wing Watch exposed, at the same time, Family Research
Council, Steve Strang (of Charisma magazine), Fay Voshell (of LifeSiteNews) and
Alex Jones (of InfoWars) just for expressing conservative views hated by the
U.S. left.
This was not my only article
blacklisted by them. Months ago, they blacklisted “Religious
Exemption: How Homosexuality Is Transforming U.S. Christianity into a Ghetto.” Right Wing Watch said on June
8, 2018,
Julio Severo is less
impressed by the Masterpiece Cakeshop decision: “In the 1980s, U.S.
conservative evangelicals fought against sodomy. Next, against gay ‘marriage’
in the late 1990s and 2000s. Now they just fight for religious exemption. Next,
will they be living in a ghetto or in jail? Is this what do they interpret as
‘victory’?”
Right
Wing Watch exposed,
at the same time, Linda Harvey, Lee Duigon and Kenneth Copeland Ministries just
for expressing conservative views hated by the U.S. left.
Julio Severo is
likewise not
a fan of Pride Month: “No one is proud of a group of worshippers of
anal sex celebrating homosexual sex!”
How
could I be a fan of a month celebrating pride in anal sex acts considered as
perversion by God in the Bible?
Right
Wing Watch exposed,
at the same time, Tucker Carlson, David Limbaugh and Judson
Phillips just for expressing conservative views hated by the U.S. left.
Not only Right Wing Watch
complained of my conservative stance against Pride Month, but the activist
website LGBTQ Nation, in an article titled “Here are some of the awful things
‘loving Christians’ are saying about Pride this year,” said,
Julio Severo, writing
on BarbWire, a
right wing conservative website run by Matt Barber, shared similar opinions.
Severo voiced his frustration with Google show their support for Pride Month on
their own website.
“I was searching
through Google last week when the Google page flashed before my eyes,
‘Celebrate Pride Month’ #ThisIsFamily. This propaganda was accompanied by
homosexual flags,” said Severo.
The site
featured three flag emoji in the small notice at the bottom of their main page,
with transgender and bi pride flags alongside the classic rainbow flag.
“A whole month
to celebrate… perverted homosexual sex and pervert the meaning of family for
the advantage of the homosexual agenda,” states Severo. “Cannot Google dedicate
a whole month for the celebration of the natural family?”
He continues,
“Normal people have no pride in anal sex. They are proud of the natural family:
a man, a woman and children. No one is proud of a group of worshippers of anal
sex celebrating homosexual sex!”
Severo complains that Google has never
mentioned Christmas or Easter, which he cites as celebrations “massively
recognized by Americans.” The popular search engine doesn’t mark religious
holidays — only secular ones.
To prevent Google from celebrating pride
month on their website, Severo suggests the government intervene “militarily,”
suggesting that troops be sent to Google headquarters to, “stop its abuses
against its users and the American family.”
It is unclear if the White House has
responded to Severo’s demand for an occupation of Google headquarters. But it
wouldn’t be too shocking at this point in the Trump administration.
Yet,
LGBTQ Nation forgot to mention it in the context I put: Neoconservatism.
It is a duty of
the U.S. government to intervene against threats to its national security. Is
not family such a national security issue?
Google suggested that pride in anal sex is
“family.” Did the founders of America see worshippers of anal sex as “family”?
Were they worshippers of homosexual depravities? Did they advocate that pride
in homosexual sex represents family? So why does the U.S. government do nothing
to stop this desecration of its most important national resource, family?
For lesser
threats, the U.S. has militarily intervened in the affairs of other nations.
Why not a military intervention in Google too?
If the U.S. can
send troops to far-away nations to solve issues with no relation to the U.S.
national security, why cannot the U.S. send its troops to the Google
headquarters and stop its abuses against its users and the American family?
Forsaking one’s own family to meddle in the
affairs of distant nations is not patriotism. It is to betray the most
important values of a homeland.
Why wage stupid wars in far-away nations if
the U.S. is not able to wage the most important war in its own soil and protect
the integrity of family from greedy companies that have overstepped their
limits?
If the U.S.
government cannot intervene in Google, why intervene in far-away nations? Is
oil more important than family? To
protect and heavily arm the Islamic dictatorship of Saudi Arabia is
more important than to protect family?
Yet, how can the
U.S. government intervene in Google if its own State Department, headed by an evangelical
Christian, has
also declared June as the LGBTI Pride Month?
Julio Severo is very
upset that Trump recognized Kwanzaa:
“There is no doubt that the FBI created a very stupid Marxist creature. Why
celebrate it?”
Why
does Right Wing Watch want to defend Trump, who is an evangelical, in his
non-conservative attitude recognizing a Marxist holiday? Specifically, why does
this powerful left-wing group want to defend Trump from a Brazilian
conservative evangelical? To understand why I thought Trump was wrong to
celebrate a Marxist holiday, read my article: “Trump
Wishes Happy… Kwanzaa, for the Sake of Politically Correct.”
Right
Wing Watch exposed,
at the same time, Ann Coulter and charismatic Paula White
just for expressing conservative views hated by the U.S. left.
Other
prominent conservative leaders frequently attacked by Right Wing Watch are: Scott Lively, Pat Robertson, Peter LaBarbera, Tony Perkins,
Matt Barber, Linda Harvey, Bill Federer, Michael Savage, Joseph Farah, Jerry Falwell
Jr., Jane Chastain, Erik Rush, Bryan Fischer, Michele Bachmann, James Dobson, Dinesh
D’Souza, Barbara Simpson, Mat Staver, Cindy Jacobs, Lou Engle, Lance Wallnau, Rick
Joyner, David Horowitz, Larry Klayman and many others.
What
does Right Wing Watch, which is owned by People for the American Way, want?
According to its website, Right
Wing Watch has a special mission to attack conservatives opposed to the gay
agenda, abortion and Muslim ideology.
Pat Robertson, of 700 Club, said, “A
nasty group.”
Peter LaBarbera, of Americans for
Truth of Homosexuality, said, “They should call it People for the Homosexual
Way.”
Matt Barber, the founder of
BarbWire, said, “A radical secularist agenda… a socialist agenda… pushing the
culture of death.”
Why
has Right Wing Watch focused on my articles?
What
do they intend?
In
2011, WND had reported on surveillance by the Homeland
Security Department against my blog. What did they intend?
In
the same year, WND reported in a headline on PayPal cutting my
account after a campaign by a U.S. homosexual organization.
Why
is Goliath (Right Wing Watch, Homeland Security Department, etc.) monitoring
and worried about a small David?
Portuguese
version of this article: O que o Observatório da Direita, da
entidade esquerdista americana People for the American Way, tem contra mim?
Source: Last Days Watchman
Recommended Reading on the U.S.
Left against Julio Severo:
Recommended Reading on Facebook
censorship:
Another Recommended Reading:
No comments:
Post a Comment