Reading the Far Left and Its Attack on Breitbart and BarbWire: Gay Perversion, Veiled and Overt
Breitbart
and BarbWire have been accused of being “homophobic.” I know what is this
because I am not strange to such attacks. Between The Lines News, a gay
publication in Michigan, made a selection last week (in its printed and online
publication): “Creep of the Week: Julio Severo.” (Originally published in its
printed version 6/15/2017, Issue 2524, Between The Lines News.)
“In a June 12 piece on Barbwire, a website
named for its unique ability to make a thinking person’s brain bleed, Severo
writes, ‘The homosexual movement became active in Brazil by direct cultural
effect from America, including her politics and Hollywood.’”
The U.S. homosexual Facebook page
“Pride USA” also posted: “Creep of the Week: Julio Severo.” (Link: http://archive.is/LEI72)
If
the accusation from Between The Lines News is local and reaches only people in
Michigan, other U.S. homosexual activists have made sure that Julio Severo and
other “far right-wingers” may not escape national and international attention.
In
an article titled “Reading the Far Right:
Homophobia, Veiled and Overt,” The Advocate focused on Breitbart and BarbWire
and their columnists. Breitbart and BarbWire are websites prominent among U.S.
conservatives.
The Advocate is the biggest gay
magazine in America and is, in its own words, “The World’s Leading News Source
for LGBT.”
Is
there a “homophobic” far-right movement in the United States? According to The
Advocate, Breitbart and BarbWire are two examples of American far-right
extremism.
The problem The Advocate sees in
Breitbart:
“Breitbart, which claims not to embrace
homophobia (that claim is questionable, and it certainly is full of
transphobia), is basically making the argument that the LGBT rights movement
used to be OK but has descended into left-wing insanity.”
The Advocate also said:
“The conversion of the Los Angeles Gay Pride
march into the anti-Trump ‘#ResistMarch’ on Sunday marked the effective end of
the gay rights movement,” wrote Breitbart
senior editor at large Joel B. Pollak. “Once, the gay rights movement stood for
tolerance: hence the rainbow flag, which is a symbol not only of pride but also
of acceptance. But the message on Sunday was that lesbian, gay, bisexual,
transgender and queer (LGBTQ) conservatives are unwelcome in that spectrum —
and are, in fact, aiding the enemy.”
Pollak contended that the movement has
changed “from a force for liberation into a tool for repression.”
Breitbart’s
stance defending supposedly “conservative” homosexuals who are not welcome in
the homosexual movement is not conservative or even Christian. Even so, The
Advocate managed to find “lots of overt homophobia” in its “reading of the
far-right media” — Breitbart!
The
Advocate has a hard time accusing Breitbart of being “far right,” if this means
“far conservative,” because one of Breitbart’s former editors, Milo Yiannopoulos, is openly homosexual.
Breitbart would have a hard time to
label itself conservative, because genuine U.S. conservatism, especially
evangelical conservatism (which is the most prevalent Christian conservatism in
America), sees nothing conservative in homosexuality.
Breitbart’s
idea that the LGBT rights movement used to be OK is nonsense. Since the days of
Alfred Kinsey, who had malicious intent and helped the homosexual movement more
than 60 years ago with his malicious sex “studies” (and his “ten percent population
is homosexual” hoax, debunked by Dr. Judith Reisman), malicious intent is an
integral part of the gay agenda’s history. So Breitbart is terribly mistaken on
his view of homosexuality.
What is The Advocate’s problem with
BarbWire?
The Advocate said:
“For a look at homophobic and transphobic
religious right ideology, one has to go no further than BarbWire, which
purports to offer a biblical worldview. It carried a column last week by Robert
Oscar Lopez, pulling out the old canard that LGBT people are out to ‘recruit’
children.”
The Advocate is right about
BarbWire offering a biblical worldview. Without such worldview, there is no
real conservatism. And, yes, the homosexual movement is always preying on
children. Or did we forget how revolted they are when parents try to protect
their own children from predatory homosexuality?
In
2013, Russia approved a law banning homosexual propaganda to children and
adolescents. Hell (Obama and his wicked State Department) was unleashed on
Russia. There was a massive revolt from homosexual activists in the U.S. and
Europe. Their revolt made appear that Russia had approved capital punishment
for homosexuals.
After
the ban, The Advocate sarcastically announced that
its 2014 Person of the Year was Vladimir Putin, seen by Patheos, an American
atheist website, as “the horrifically homophobic president of Russia and a
committed opponent of all things pro-LGBT.”
For
homosexual activists in the U.S. and Europe, a ban on homosexual propaganda to
children is akin to killing homosexuals! The homosexual movement cannot see
itself away from children.
Even
today, Putin is attacked just because of the ban. Last Sunday, one of the
world’s largest Gay “Pride” Parades in São Paulo, Brazil, depicted mockingly Putin as a “drag queen.”
In
2014, when I participated in a pro-family event at
the Kremlin, Moscow, the American participants were fearful because U.S.
homosexual activists were pressuring the Obama’s State Department to
investigate them over their participation in this event. After all, Russia was
suffering sanctions from Obama and his left-wing administration.
Not much has changed. Trump’s State
Department has increased the Obama sanctions against Russia and has recognized
June as Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender and Intersex (LGBTI) Pride Month — continuing the tradition of
Obama’s State Department.
The U.S. government has not changed
in its defense of homosexual interests against Russia, which has kept its ban
on homosexual propaganda to children.
What did Robert Oscar Lopez say
that infuriated The Advocate? He said “that recruiting children into the LGBT
identity, and then locking them into it, is fundamental to the LGBT community’s
survival.”
A
ban on such recruiting is fundamental, but the U.S. coercive homosexual
tactics, including with government assistance, have relentlessly chastised
Russia. With such attitude, the U.S. government shows clearly that it will
never protect children from predatory homosexuality.
The Advocate also said:
“In another column published by BarbWire last week, theology professor John Barber
(it’s not clear if he’s related to site founder Matt Barber) asserted that
there’s no such thing as a gay Christian — even a gay person who refrains from
acting on same-sex desires, he said, can’t be a real Christian, because Jesus
would have taken those desires away. ‘Without the dominion of sin being broken,
the picture of the gay Christian is equivalent to a unicorn sighting,’ Barber
wrote.”
That
concept is rejected even by some Christian denominations that don’t approve of
same-sex relationships, such as the Roman Catholic Church and the Mormon
Church, which say a gay, lesbian, or bisexual person can be faithful to the
church’s doctrine by remaining celibate.
Pause.
If the Catholic Church really believes this way, this certainly explains the
massive numbers of homosexual Catholic priests abusing boys! The Advocate
added:
It’s
also certainly contrary to the experiences of those who identify as gay and
Christian. And some mainline Christian denominations are far more accepting,
with the Episcopal Church, Presbyterian Church (USA), Evangelical Lutheran
Church in America, and more offering church marriages to same-sex couples.
Apparently, The Advocate ignores
the word apostasy, which is guided by a wicked and sick worldview. The Advocate
ignores that the author of apostasy and the acceptance of homosexuality among
Christian churches is Satan and his demons. The Advocate also ignores that the
Author of all condemnation of homosexuality in the Bible is not man. It is God.
The Advocate’s worldview? Its
inspiration comes the same author that causes apostasy among Christian churches.
Also,
The Advocate did not forget me. It said:
Oh, and yet another BarbWire contributor,
Julio Severo, spent a recent column
excoriating Secretary of State Rex Tillerson for recognizing June as LGBT Pride
Month. And even though Trump hasn’t issued a proclamation for Pride Month or
scheduled a reception for it (as Obama did every year of his presidency),
Severo saw Trump as complicit in the dreaded “homosexual agenda.”
“The same homosexual principles that drove
U.S. diplomacy under Obama now drive the U.S. diplomacy under Trump,” Severo
wrote. “The only difference is that while Obama was vocal about these
principles, Trump gives a tacit support, by allowing his own administration to
speak for himself. If the saying ‘silence means assent’ is correct, Trump’s
‘silence’ is a message.”
Oh, and by “homosexual principles” he seems
to mean the condemnation of anti-LGBT persecution around the world. “Obama used
the U.S. government to lead the world, by his bad example, into accepting the
homosexual lifestyle as normal,” Severo commented. “By tacit or explicit
support, the Trump administration is leading the world in the same bad
example.” Severo also gave credence to the hate-fueled stereotype that gay
people prey on children.
If I condemned Obama’s State
Department for its homosexual propaganda, why should I spare Trump’s State Department
over the same propaganda?
Regarding a “stereotype that gay
people prey on children,” gay “conservative” Milo
Yiannopoulos lost his job as a Breitbart editor after his interests in
pedophilia were exposed.
Homosexuals, even “conservative”
homosexuals, have a special interest in children. Yiannopoulos
has proved it.
If
there were no connection between homosexuality and sex abuse of boys, the Catholic Church would have no scandal
of homosexual priests abusing boys.
This is not the first time The
Advocate attacks me. In 2011 The Advocate criticized me because I defended a
child and her biological mother against a homosexual predator. You can read the
whole story here: “World’s
biggest gay magazine: no compassion and tolerance for a former lesbian and her
daughter.”
Yet, what is The Advocate’s reason
for depicting BarbWire and Breitbart as “far right”? Some 40 years ago a conservative
publication hiring open homosexual Milo Yiannopoulos as an editor would be seen
as far liberal and far left-wing.
The U.S. culture has changed and
rotted so much that homosexualists have become excessively demanding. Forty
years ago, you were labeled a leftist and homosexualist if you only supported
gay “marriage” without subscribing to every other tenet of the homosexual
gospel.
Today, if you subscribe to every
homosexual tenet, including on “marriage” and adoption, but disagrees on
coercive homosexual tactics, you are labeled “far right-winger,” “fascist” and
“Nazi.” For The Advocate’s nasty worldview, if you do not support totally, in
every point, the gay agenda, you are not friend. You are enemy. This reality is
also applicable to Trump, who has let his State Department promote homosexual
propaganda but he disagrees on coercive homosexual tactics. Trump has become an
enemy not because he fights the gay agenda (which in fact he does not fight),
but just because he has not satisfied all wishes from homosexualists and their
agenda.
Even though Breitbart and Trump may
hire thousands and thousands of copies of Milo Yiannopoulos, Peter
Thiel
and other “conservative” homosexuals, The Advocate and other far-left-wing
activists will keep accusing them of “homophobic,” “far right-wing,” “fascist”
and, of course, their favorite insulting label: “Nazi.”
By the way, according to German
author and professor Lothar Machtan, in his book “The Hidden Hitler” (Basic
Books, 2001), Adolf Hitler was a homosexual. In his book “The Pink Swastika”
(Veritas Aeterna, 1995), author Scott Lively contends that many Nazi leaders
were homosexual.
Hitler
and his Nazi movement were what the U.S. homosexual movement is today. Oppressive,
repressive and dictatorial. But they accuse real conservatives of what
homosexualists are.
I
disagree with Breitbart’s compromised stance against the gay agenda and I agree
with BarbWire’s biblical stance, but if for The Advocate “far right” means
radicalism against homosexuals and if BarbWire and Breitbart, which do not kill
homosexuals or endorse their killing, are “far right,” what are Saudi Arabia
and other Islamic nations that kill homosexuals?
If
The Advocate is concerned about real radicalism against homosexuals, it should
make a list of Islamic nations that kill homosexuals. It should pressure Trump
and his State Department to do to Saudi Arabia and other Muslim nations that
kill homosexuals just as what Obama’s State Department did to Russia and what Trump’s
State Department does to Russia: sanctions, sanctions and more sanctions.
Yet, Obama had no such concern.
Trump also has not. And what has The Advocate done? After condemning BarbWire
and Breitbart, and sparing all Islamic nations, The Advocate condemned NRATV —
the National Rifle Association’s online video channel — and other conservative
channels for saying that a Muslim committed the worst terrorist attack on U.S.
homosexuals — the
mass shooting at Pulse gay nightclub in Orlando June 12, 2016.
If it was not a Muslim, who was? BarbWire
and Breitbart? Julio Severo?
For The Advocate, is it impossible
for Muslims to be responsible for terror attacks against homosexuals? In
contrast, is it impossible for BarbWire and Breitbart not to be culprit of
“homophobia”?
This
is sheer insanity and hypocrisy: To condemn the innocent and spare the culprit!
Trump
needs to understand what Obama did not understand: the intrinsically dishonest
and Nazi nature of the homosexual movement.
He needs BarbWire’s worldview, not
Breitbart’s worldview, guiding his administration. And he should stop his
administration from doing what Obama did: to bully Russia over its ban on
homosexual propaganda to children.
Putin is right. Russia is right. A
ban on homosexual propaganda to children is necessary.
BarbWire and its conservative
biblical worldview are right. A ban on recruiting children into the LGBT
identity is fundamental.
Yet, while Russia under Putin has
successfully implemented its ban on homosexual propaganda to children, the
Trump administration and its State Department have given no room for
implementing BarbWire’s conservative biblical worldview to ban recruiting
children into the LGBT identity.
Trump
needs BarbWire in his administration. If he embraces BarbWire and its biblical
worldview, The Advocate will certainly name him Person of the Year.
Breitbart’s worldview, which
embraces the illusion of a conservative homosexuality, is insufficient to
defeat The Advocate’s far left-wing worldview and its veiled and overt gay perversion.
But BarbWire’s worldview, which is biblical, not far right, is more than enough.
Portuguese version of this article: Entendendo a extrema esquerda e seu ataque contra o
Breitbart e o BarbWire: a perversão gay, encoberta e pública
Recommended
Reading:
Posts
No comments :
Post a Comment