Unilever threatens to pull advertising from Facebook, Google and Twitter if they don’t tackle “toxic” content and “fake news”
The problem is when left-wingers define what is toxic content and fake news
By
Julio
Severo
Unilever,
one of the world’s largest advertisers, is threatening to pull its investment
and marketing from tech giants such as Google, Facebook and Twitter if the
platforms fuel “hate” and create “division” — a suspicious accusation considering
the accuser’s left-wing motivation.
Executives from Facebook and other
tech companies have admitted that they could do more to combat “hate,” “abuse”
and “extremism” on their platforms. Considering that these terms are never
leveled at left-wing activity, the accusation of “hate,” “abuse” and “extremism”
speaks volumes about the accuser. Of course, this is not to deny that there are
hate, abuse and extremism among some right-wingers
— the Catholic effort to rehabilitate the Inquisition through a Marxist revisionism
is an example. But such extremism
is rejected by the overwhelming majority of conservatives, while among
left-wingers hate, abuse and extremism — the worship of Che Guevara and other
communist killers — are not rejected.
“Unilever
will not invest in platforms or environments that do not protect our children
or which create division in society, and promote anger or hate,” Weed said. “We
will prioritize investing only in responsible platforms that are committed to
creating a positive impact in society.”
Weed
called on the technology industry “to improve” their actions against “fake news”
and “toxic” online content. The problem always is that Facebook and Unilever,
dominated by left-wingers, never apply such terms to left-wing news and
content.
Unilever
said it is committed to tackling “gender stereotypes” in advertising and will
only partner with organizations that are committed to creating “better” digital
infrastructure. Better for whom? As ever, for their left-wing ideology.
“Gender
stereotypes” is, in Unilever’s view, an excuse to protect children from Bible
and conservative views. Actually, Unilever thinks that the lack of homosexual
indoctrination makes children “unprotected.”
When
Unilever says that it “will not invest in platforms or environments that do not
protect our children,” it means that the only protection children need is from
conservative ideas.
It
is a miracle the conservative presence in Facebook, because this left-wing
company is doing everything in its power to censor conservatives. And now
Unilever wants Facebook to increase censorship.
Unilever was heavily criticized last
year for a Dove advert, massively denounced by Facebook users, biased against
mothers.
The
Dove advert celebrated
what Unilever sees as real moms “whose diverse parenting styles shatter
stereotypes about motherhood and prove that there are no rules about how to be
a parent today.”
The
“real mothers” in the Dove advert were two biological men who identified as
women. For Unilever, such propaganda “creates a positive impact in society.”
For Unilever, two homosexual men are just as capable of being mothers as
biological females are and to be a real woman is not a requirement for being a
mom.
The
Dove advert faced a massive backlash from users, who used extensively Facebook,
Google and Twitter to denounce, through conservative articles and posts, Unilever’s
propaganda against real mothers.
Now, in vengeance, Unilever is pressuring
Facebook, Google and Twitter to tackle users’ backlash tools against its
pro-homosexuality propagandas by banning conservative posts and the share of
conservative articles.
Just as a case in point, right now I
am blocked on my own Facebook profile. Facebook’s
justification for the block was that two posts, of 5 years ago, are now deemed “offensive,” because
they had links to two articles on my blog. One article against Islamic invasion
in Europe, denouncing Islamic violence. And another article exposing how
homosexual groups in Brazil explore taxpayers by receiving millions to spread
their immoral lifestyle.
I
have been banned for thirty days. This is the third time, in just six months,
that Facebook has imposed a 30-day ban on my personal profile.
If,
as Unilever wants, Facebook should do much more to tackle users who backlash against
Unilever’s immoral propaganda, then will conservative users be censored, banned
and expelled from Facebook?
In
2015, Faith Driven Consumer — representing 41 million Christian consumers who
spend $2 trillion annually — labeled Unilever, with Microsoft and Apple, one of
the companies most disrespectful to biblical worldview.
As
a Facebook user, I strongly disagree with Unilever’s propaganda portraying two
homosexual men as “real mothers.” I will do everything in my power, as a user
on Facebook, Google and Twitter, to express my view against such perversion.
And Unilever is doing everything in its power to ban my view.
Will
Unilever prevail over the conservative public’ will?
Will
Facebook, Google and Twitter prevail over their conservative users?
Portuguese version of this article: Unilever
ameaça retirar anúncios do Facebook, Google e Twitter se não atacarem conteúdo “tóxico”
e “notícias falsas”
Recommended
Reading:
Posts
No comments :
Post a Comment