Hitler’s Strident Anti-Marxism
Anti-Semitism and the Nazi Fight against Soviet
Marxism
By Julio
Severo
How
could mostly Christian Germany be duped into the Nazi ideology? Rev. Erwin W.
Lutzer, in his book “Hitler’s Cross: How the Cross of Christ was used to
promote the Nazi agenda” (Moody Publishers), explains how German Christians
embraced Adolf Hitler as a savior against Marxism:
“Many churchmen were duped. Father
Falkan, a Catholic parish priest, said, ‘I must admit that I was glad to see
the Nazis come to power, because at that time I felt that Hitler as a Catholic
was a Godfearing individual who could battle communism for the Church … the
anti-Semitism of the Nazis, as well as their anti-Marxism, appealed to the
church.’”
Actually,
the anti-Marxism of the Nazis appealed not only to Catholics, but also to Lutherans,
industrialists and conservatives in Germany. For them, Hitler was just using a
socialist cloak (National Socialism) to combat an ideology very popular among
the German working classes: communism.
Hitler’s Fight against Soviet Marxism
Soviet
communism was threatening Germany and Hitler was able to unify conservative and
Christian (Catholic and Protestant) Germans under the banner of total fight
against Soviet Marxism. Hitler’s condemnation of Marxism was explicit. He said,
Ugly face of
Marxism.
The destructive
work of Marxism, its poisoning propaganda, dupes people.
Marxism should
be destroyed
Democracy, as practiced
in Western Europe today, is the forerunner of Marxism. In fact, the latter
would not be conceivable without the former. Democracy is the breeding-ground
in which the bacilli of the Marxist world pest can grow and spread.
I expressed for
the first time the conviction that the question of the future of the German
nation is the question of the destruction of Marxism.
A pestilence,
such as Marxism.
Marxism will
march with democracy until, by roundabout means, it succeeds in winning for its
criminal aims the support of the sane national spiritual world which it is
determined to eradicate.
the future of
the German nation can be secured is the problem of how Marxism can be
exterminated. I considered the disastrous policy of the Triple Alliance as one
of the consequences resulting from the disintegrating effects of the Marxist
teaching; for the alarming feature was that this teaching was invisibly
corrupting the foundations of a healthy political and economic outlook…
Sometimes they tried to cure the disease by doctoring the symptoms, which were
taken as the cause. But since nobody recognized, or wanted to recognize, the
real cause of the disease this way of combating Marxism was no more effective
than the application of some quacks ointment.
These
astoundingly anti-Marxist ideas, espoused by Adolf Hitler in his autobiography
“Mein Kampf” (published in 1926), would conquer any modern anti-Marxist audience.
If,
as socialist author George Orwell said, “During times of universal deceit, telling
the truth becomes a revolutionary act,” then Hitler did a revolutionary act by
saying the truth about Marxism. In fact, he revolutionized his generation with
his anti-Marxism. And any other individual in our times courageous enough to
say the truth about Marxism would be doing a revolutionary act.
With his
strident and inflammatory anti-Marxist speech, Hitler led Germany into an
incredibly anti-Marxist euphoria that ultimately gave him the total political
power through democratic means. What especially propelled into power was the
ideal environment: Germany was undergoing a heavy economic crisis.
Richard
J. Evans, in his book “The Coming of the Third Reich” (Penguin Group, 2003),
commented, “Small businesses and workshops were particularly badly hit. In
their incomprehension of the wider forces that were destroying their
livelihood, those most severely affected found it easy to believe the claims of
Catholic and conservative journalists that Jewish financiers were to blame.”
Yet,
in his political campaigns to get elected, Hitler did not focus on the Jews. His
focus was Soviet Marxism. “In a speech delivered to hundreds of businessmen in
1932, Hitler blamed Marxism for Germany’s problems but didn’t even mention the
Jews. Evans’ comment is apt here: ‘Antisemitism, so prominent in Nazi
propaganda in the 1920s, took a back seat, and had little influence in winning
the Nazis support in the elections of the early 1930s.’” (Joseph Keysor “Hitler,
the Holocaust, and the Bible: A Scriptural Analysis of Anti-Semitism, National
Socialism, and the Churches in Nazi Germany,” Athanatos Publishing Group.)
Eventually,
his speech against Soviet Marxism assured him victory.
In
his book “Hitler, God, & the Bible” (WND Books, 2012), Ray Comfort said,
“If Hitler was anything, he was a master of propaganda. In order for the Nazi
Party to rise, he campaigned for the end of Marxism…”
According
to Comfort, he unified German churches in this mission.
Hitler’s Fight against Jewish Marxism
Yet,
there was a problem. His truth and revolution included demonization of the
Jews. Demonization of Marxism and demonization of the Jews went hand in hand. His
motivation was anti-Semitism. He rejected Marxism because it had been created
by a Jew. He rejected Marxism because it was being led prominently by Russian
Jews. Even though he had not a focus on Jews in his 1932 campaign to get
elected, Hitler said in his autobiography in 1926,
My eyes were
opened to two perils, the names of which I scarcely knew hitherto and had no
notion whatsoever of their terrible significance for the existence of the
German people. These two perils were Marxism and Judaism.
In Russian
Bolshevism we must see the attempt undertaken by the Jews in the twentieth
century to achieve world domination.
Karl Marx,
author of Das Kapital, was the son of Protestant parents, converts from
Judaism. Like many others who later on identified themselves with Socialism,
known previously in its Utopian forms in France, he was educated in the neo-Hegelian
philosophy. At the time this markedly evolutionistic doctrine ran foul of
Lutheran Christianity in a conventional and fundamentalistic form. There
appeared to be no chance for reconciliation between philosophy and religion.
Therefore
Marxism itself is nothing but the transmission, carried out by the Jew Karl
Marx, of a long existing
attitude and conception, conditioned by a view of life, to the form of a
definite political creed: international Marxism. Without the basis of such a
general, previously existing poisoning, the astounding political success of
this doctrine would never have been possible. Karl Marx was really the only one
among millions who, in the swamp of a gradually decomposing world, recognized,
with the keen eye of the prophet, the most essential poison elements, took them
out, in order to render them, like a magician of the black arts, into a
concentrated solution for the quicker destruction of the independent existence
of the free nations of this earth. But all this in the service of his race.
The Jewish
doctrine of Marxism rejects the aristocratic principle in nature.
What gave
Marxism its astounding power over the broad masses is in no way the formal work
of Jewish labor of thinking, put down in writing, but rather the colossal oratorical
wave of propaganda that took possession of the masses in the course of the
years… This work has actually not been written for the great masses, but
exclusively for the intellectual leaders of that Jewish machine of world
conquest.
In their
book “Beyond Totalitarianism: Stalinism and Nazism Compared” (Cambridge
University Press 2009), Michael Geyer and Sheila Fitzpatrick revealed the Nazi
fight against the Soviet Union was a racial fight. They said,
Hitler’s
intent to conduct the war against the Soviet Union as a political-ideological
and racial-ideological war of destruction… the readiness to conduct an
anti-Bolshevik crusade implied an agreement to pursue the war as a racial war
against “Jewish Bolshevism.”
At
the same time, the authors admit, “Bolshevik
Commissars… were often Jewish.”
Jewish Prominence
After
Hitler’s election, the anti-Semitism seen in “Mein Kampf” was resurrected with
vengeance, and Hitler returned to underscore the Jews as a so important threat
as Soviet Marxism, making to appear that the Jews had an exclusively wicked
prominence in everything. But this is a gross and malicious lie. Since God
blessed Abraham, Isaac and Jacob and their descendants, the Jews have a prominence
and excellence in everything they are involved in. Were Jews involved in the
birth of the United States? Yes. The result? Excellent! Were the Jews involved
in the birth of the Soviet Union? Yes. The result? Ugly.
If
the Jews had prominence exclusively in wicked events, their detractors would
have reason to condemn them. But this is not so. As everybody else, Jews are
involved in wicked and good events. And because they have a special blessing
from God, whatever they touch, good or evil, becomes much better or much worse.
So, the right way to channel God’s blessing, especially economic blessings,
granted to Jews is an union with true Christians. Such union and good channel
happened in the birth of the United States. The wrong way to channel the Jewish
blessings is to let atheists to use them to advance their cause. Dr. Bernard
Nathanson, the most prominent abortionist in the world, was an atheist of Jewish
extraction. He had overseen over 60,000 abortions in the U.S. His case could
easily be used by anti-Semites to declare that all Jews are wicked. Yet,
eventually Nathanson questioned his abortion business and left it. Besides, the
only Savior of the humankind, Jesus Christ, is a Jew. He is such massive good
Jewish example that easily surpasses any Jewish bad examples, especially Karl
Marx.
Those
who hate the Jews should remember that Jesus is not a Brazilian, an American, a
Russian or Arabian. He is a Jew! Those who hate the Jews per se hate Jesus too.
Because
of God’s covenant with the descendants of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, the Jews
always have a big potential for extreme good or evil. Yet, no wicked Jew will
surpass, in prominence, the supreme Good Jew, Jesus.
Henry Ford: Jews, The World’s Foremost Problem
Hitler’s
criticism of Marxism and, simultaneously, of Jews was in no way a pioneering
work. Six years before the publication of “Mein Kampf” in Germany, auto magnate
Henry Ford Sr. launched in the United States his anti-Semitic book “The
International Jew: The World’s Foremost Problem,” published in 1920. “The
International Jew” was published in a variety of languages and disseminated
widely in the United States and abroad. The first Brazilian edition was
published by publisher Globo in 1933. This American book, very popular today on
the Internet, was much more stridently anti-Jew than “Mein Kampf” was. In it Ford
said,
Werner Sombart,
in his “Jew and Modern Capitalism” says, “If the conditions in America continue
to develop along the same lines as in the last generation, if the immigration
statistics and the proportion of births among all the nationalities remain the
same, our imagination may picture the United States of fifty or a hundred years
hence as a land inhabited only by Slavs [Russians], Negroes and Jews, wherein
the Jews will naturally occupy the position of economic leadership.” Sombart is
a pro-Jewish writer.
The question is,
If the Jew is in control, how did it happen? This is a free country. The Jew
comprises only about three per cent of the population; to every Jew there are
97 Gentiles; to the 3,000,000 Jews in the United States there are 97,000,000
Gentiles. If the Jew is in control, is it because of his superior ability, or
is it because of the inferiority and don't-care attitude of the Gentiles?
The true
capitalists of the world are Jews, who are capitalists for capital’s sake.
The Jews created
capitalism, we are told. But capitalism has proved itself ill-behaved. So now,
the Jewish creators are going to destroy their creation. They have done so in
Russia. And now, will the American people be good and let their Jewish
benefactors do the same in America?
But the Jews
have not destroyed capitalism in Russia. When Lenin and Trotsky make their
farewell bow and retire under the protective influence of the Jewish
capitalists of the world, it will be seen that only Gentile or Russian capital
has been destroyed, and that Jewish capital has been enthroned.
The conclusion,
when all the facts are considered, is irresistible, that the Bolshevik
revolution was a carefully groomed investment on the part of International
Jewish Finance.
In
the chapter 15, entitled “Is the Jewish ‘Kahal’ the Modern ‘Soviet’?” of his
book, Ford says:
The Soviet is
not a Russian but a Jewish institution. Nor is it the invention of Russian Jews
of the present time, a new political device which has been set up as a vehicle
of the ideas of Lenin and Trotsky; it is of ancient Jewish origin, a device
which the Jews themselves invented to maintain their distinctive racial and
national life after the conquest of Palestine by the Romans. Modern Bolshevism,
which is now known to be merely the outer cloak of a long-planned coup to
establish the domination of a race, immediately set up the Soviet form of
government because the Jews of all countries who contributed to Russian
Bolshevism had long been schooled in the nature and structure of the Soviet.
There
is also a whole chapter, 19, entitled “The All-Jewish Mark on ‘Red Russia.’”
In
the chapter 20, entitled “Jewish Testimony in Favor of Bolshevism,” Ford says:
It is very well
known that “what Jewish idealism and Jewish discontent have so powerfully
contributed to accomplish in Russia” is also being attempted in the United
States.
“Jewish idealism
and Jewish discontent” are not directed against capital. Capital is enlisted in
their service. The only governmental order the Jewish effort is directed
against is Gentile governmental order; and the only “capital” it attacks is
Gentile capital.
Capitalist
Ford’s thoughts were astoundingly similar to socialist nationalist Hitler’s.
Later Ford publicly apologized for its anti-Semitic book and Hitler dismissed
his own biography as nonsense.
Yet,
“Mein Kampf” and especially “The International Jew” have been a particularly
powerful tool today for anti-Semitic individuals trying to validate their
hostile beliefs. While both books once reached thousands, their reach is now
even greater on the Internet. Today, they can touch a whole new generation,
connected to anti-Jew hatred via the internet. Both books have been favorite
among Muslims.
Nearly
70 years before these books, the founder of Marxism expressed the same hateful
ideas, as shown by Rev. Richard
Wurmbrand, a Romanian Lutheran minister of Jewish extraction based in America,
in his booklet “Marx and Satan.” Rev. Wurmbrand said,
Though a Jew, Marx wrote a pernicious
anti-Jewish book called The Jewish Question. In 1856, he wrote in The New York
Tribune an article entitled “The Russian Loan,” in which we read: “We know that
behind every tyrant stands a Jew, as a Jesuit stands behind every Pope. As the
army of the Jesuits kills every free thought, so the desire of the oppressed
would have chances of success, the usefulness of wars incited by capitalists
would cease, if it were not for the Jews who steal the treasures of mankind. It
is no wonder that 1856 years ago Jesus chased the usurers from the Jerusalem
temple. They were like the contemporary usurers who stand behind tyrants and
tyrannies. The majority of them are Jewish. The fact that the Jews have become
so strong as to endanger the life of the world causes us to disclose their
organization, their purpose, that its stench might awaken the workers of the
world to fight and eliminate such a canker.”
Marx
did not express his idea in Soviet Union or Nazi Germany, which did not exist
in the 1850s. He did it in the heart of the American press, New York, in the
most capitalist nation in the world.
Marx
was a man involved in occultism who embraced a fight against capitalism, a
fight that eventually brought disasters and genocides to humankind. The works and legacy of an occultist are
spiritual confusion, deception and death.
Confusion: Was Hitler a Left-Winger or Right-Winger?
Two
apparently contradictory issues in Hitler’s fight against Soviet Marxism were
that 1) his Nazi movement was the National Socialist German Workers’ Party, and
2) Nazi Germany was socialist because of its treaty lasting a few months in
1939 with the Soviet Union, the largest socialist power in the world in that
time.
As a
man profoundly involved in esoteric and occultist practices, Hitler was a
master of trickery and shrewdly created a movement, with socialist appeal, to
draw the German people away from Soviet Marxism. English libertarian Tim Stanley explains better his trickery
and strategy:
So how do we
explain why Hitler often called himself a socialist? It’s a matter of fashion:
in the 1920s and 1930s, socialism was the wave of the future and had a massive
effect upon the political discourse. Lots of people used the terminology of
Marxism without necessarily signing up to it or even understanding it. And
plenty of governments spoke of the need to raise living standards, help the
poor or even manage the economy — but we wouldn’t call them Marxist. America
had its New Deal; Sweden its Social Democracy. The Japanese militarised their
entire country, but did so to expand the domain of an emperor that they thought
was a living god, which is hardly classic commie behaviour. In Britain, Stanley
Baldwin’s government spent millions on a house building programme and set up
the state-owned BBC. But Stanley was no Stalin.
That Hitler
wasn’t a socialist became apparent within weeks of becoming Chancellor of
Germany when he started arresting socialists and communists.
Marxism is
defined by class war, and socialism is accomplished with the total victory of
the Proletariat over the ruling classes. By contrast, Hitler offered an
alliance between labour and capital in the form of corporatism – with the
express purpose of preventing
class war. Marxists regarded this as one of the stages of capitalist development
and few at the time legitimately interpreted the Third Reich to be a socialist
society. The radical George Bernard Shaw, for example, certainly expressed
sympathy for Hitler when he came to power but later described the dictator’s
socialism as fraudulent – as a way of buying off the inevitable revolution. He
wore, in Shaw’s opinion, “the latest mask of capitalism.”
Given that the
dictator enjoyed the support of a bourgeoisie that accepted that sacrifices had
to be made to defend their profits against socialism, we might define the Third
Reich as capitalism embracing aspects of socialist economics in order to defend
the interests of capitalists. Shaw was right.
Tim Stanley says that, for Hitler, defeating
the “Jewish” communist movement was the only thing that ever really mattered.
Hitler’s
occultist trickery is evident in the confusion that people face when trying to describe
him today. For instance, whenever atheists insist that he was an example of
Catholic and Christian chauvinism they forget his intense hatred of
Christianity. Whenever Christians try to portray him as an atheist, they forget
how happy he was to borrow Christian language or to work with Catholic and
Lutheran collaborators. Whenever right-wingers try to portray him as a
socialist, they forget his connections with industrialists and intense hatred
of Soviet Marxism. And whenever left-wingers try to portray him as a right-winger,
they forget how he socialized the German economy in the latter part of the
1930s, although not for the sake of building socialism, but to prepare Germany
for war.
Marxism’ main characteristic is by
far atheism. The most atheist nation in the world, for example, was Soviet
Union. In contrast, Hitler was never an atheist. Nominally, he was Catholic,
even though in essence he was an esotericist.
In comparison
to Stalin, an atheist, Hitler was so “religious” that Mussolini had, according
to a report
in The Telegraph, asked the pope to excommunicate him from the Catholic Church,
out of envy, because he did not like to see Hitler, a Catholic German, closer
to the pope than he, who was an Italian.
Just as many in his days, including
Roosevelt, Hitler’s socialism was neither original nor atheist, but his
anti-Marxism was esoteric. There were also other examples of esoteric anti-Marxism,
even though they were lesser. The Traditionalist School, founded by the Islamic
esotericist René Guénon, fused anti-Marxism conservatism with New Age ideas.
Some anti-Marxist esotericists today are Trevor
Loudon and Olavo
de Carvalho.
Regardless
you choose to see Hitler as a left-winger or right-winger, he was an occultist.
A man involved in occultism will use any cause available, whether it is a
leftist or rightist cause, to advance his covert objectives. In Hitler’s case,
his main banner was the fight against the Jews and Soviet Marxism. Whatever
cause or fight he embraced, against Marxism or against capitalism, would
eventually end in disaster, because he was an occultist. The works and legacy of an occultist are spiritual confusion, deception
and death.
As an
evidence that Nazi Germany was exclusively socialist, many point to the 1939
Soviet-Nazi Pact, which lasted just a few months. Yet, if such short-lived union
to the Soviet Union is an evidence that Nazi Germany was socialist, what would
the same critics say about the U.S.-Soviet alliance, which lasted from 1941 to
1945 during the World War 2, for much more time than the short Soviet-Nazi alliance
did?
The
most important distinction was that while Nazi Germany slaughtered millions of Jews
in Europe, the Soviet Union had Jews in its political and military leadership,
including in the Red Army.
Though
Henry Ford apologized for The International Jew, he later accepted the Grand
Cross of the German Eagle from Hitler’s Nazi government in July, 1938. One of
the most prominent American capitalists being awarded by a “socialist”
government? As an anti-Marxist and anti-Jew capitalist, Ford was just being
awarded by an anti-Marxist and anti-Jew government. He never received such
award from the Soviet Union, which was Marxist and not anti-Jew, at least not
while Hitler was living.
Inferior and Unintelligent Race: Jews and Russians?
Adolf
Hitler and Ford used the fact that Karl Marx was a Jew and that many advocates
of Marxism in the Soviet Union were Jews as a fair pretext to demonize the
Jews. With Ford and Hitler, demonization of Marxism and demonization of the
Jews went hand in hand.
Today,
in the demonization of Marxism, the Jew has been replaced by the Russian.
Demonization of Marxism and demonization of Russians have gone hand in hand in
many conservative circles, which seem to see Karl Marx as a Russian and,
similarly, the advocates of Marxism as Russians. In fact, they seem to see
Russians per se as personifications of evil and Marxism, just as Hitler and
Ford saw the Jews per se as personifications of evil and Marxism.
If
previously there were infinite conspiracy theories about the Jews, now there
are infinite conspiracy theories about Russians. These theories are
interesting, because at the same time that traditionally Hitler and many others
portrayed Russians as inferior and unintelligent Slavs incapable of high political
and military projects, their propaganda presented Slavic or Russian
conspiracies as phenomenally menacing. By the way, Jews were similarly seen as
inferior and menacing.
Nazis
were tremendously contradictory in their portrayal of Russians. For them,
Russians were inferior, despicable (just because of their association with
Jewish Marxists) and incompetent in military and political exploits. But they
were, incredibly, an extraordinary and cosmic threat (again, just because of
their association with Jewish Marxists)!
This
Nazi propaganda has survived even after the Soviet Union fell in 1990. Today,
pro-homosexuality Europe, often under pressure of an equally pro-homosexuality
U.S., keeps portraying Russians as inferior, despicable and a threat, even
though Russia is the only power protecting its society against the aggressive
gay agenda. At the same time, Europe, with the U.S. blessing, has been
receiving millions of illegal Muslim immigrants, whose beliefs do not merely
reject the gay agenda, but kill homosexuals. They are especially fond of
killing Christians. These immigrants and their Islamic fanaticism are a real
threat and the European civilization is in serious danger of extinction because
of them. Even so, Russians are portrayed as a bigger threat, even though the
Russian opposition, different of the Islamic opposition, to the gay agenda does
not involve murder of homosexuals.
Politically
correct multiculturalism in Europe and the U.S. heartily embraces Muslims and
their murderous ideology erroneously called “religion of peace,” but it does
not tolerate Russians, who are mostly Orthodox Christians.
For the European and the U.S.
multiculturalism, Orthodox Christian Russians are inferior to Muslims. Not
different from the Nazi “multiculturalism,” which fully embraced alliances with
Muslims while treating Russians as inferior.
In his booklet
“Marx and Satan,” Rev. Richard Wurmbrand explains that the founder of Marxism
had the same Nazi ideas about Slavs or Russians. He said,
Marx wrote in his new year’s roundup of
1848 about “the Slavic riffraff,” which included Russians, Czechs, and Croats.
These “retrograde” races had nothing left for them by fate except “the
immediate task of perishing in the revolutionary world storm.”
“The coming world war will cause not only
reactionary classes and dynasties, but entire reactionary peoples, to disappear
from the face of the earth. And that will be progress.”
“Their very name will vanish.”
Hitler and
Marx shared at least three preferences: both were occultists and despised Jews
and Russians.
Nazi Genocide of Russian POWs
Hitler’s
hatred of Soviet Marxism and of the Jewish role in it was evident in the way
Nazis treated Soviet POWs, perhaps especially because the Red Army had approximately
500,000 military Jews, among soldiers and high rank officials. Crystal Rayle, in
“Captives of Hell: The Treatment of Soviet Prisoners of War Captured by the
Nazi Army 1941-1942” (Greensboro Historical Review , issue 1, May 2008,
published by the University of North Carolina, Greensboro) said,
Russian
prisoners of war captured by the Nazi Wehrmacht during the Second World War
survived some of the most inhumane forms of treatment imaginable. Nazi
propaganda heavily influenced the belief that the Soviets were conspiring
against Germany on the side of European Jewry, resulting in the capture and
subsequent genocide of millions of Soviet POWs.
Historians
tend to agree that the Germans treated Soviet POWs more ruthlessly than other
POWs, including the notion that they were deliberately annihilated.
Aside
from the Jews, the Soviet POWs were the second largest group of victims whose
lives were claimed by the Nazi regime.
The Soviet POWs,
even though they are the second greatest victims of World War II, tend to be
regarded as the “other” victims. Although nothing can compare to the
experiences of the six million Jews who lost their lives during the Holocaust,
Soviet POWs deserve a stronger presence in the history of Genocide. The Nazis
considered the Soviets, unlike other groups, political and racial enemies of
the Reich. Soldiers sent off to defend the Soviet Union were persecuted because
of their racial inferiority as a Slavic people as well as their political
associations with Bolshevism [Soviet Marxism].
[Soviet] POWs
became the earliest test subjects for the use of the poisonous gas Zyklon B
[used later against the Jews].
Hitler’s
reasoning for the hatred of Bolshevism and Communism arose out of his idea that
Bolshevism was a product of the Jews.
Hitler demonized
the Soviet people by describing them as having a Slav-tartar body with a Jewish
head. Hitler believed
that Marxism was a product of Jews.
According
to Rayle, Hitler hated Russians because in his mind Jews and Soviet Marxists
were basically connected.
Considering
that Hitler — who was an ally of Islamic Palestinians and so tolerant of Islam,
but not of Jews — has been defeated decades ago and that the Soviet Union has
fallen many years ago, how to explain that America and Europe are so tolerant
of Islam, which threatens to extinguish the American and European civilization,
and so intolerant of Russia, whose Orthodox Christianity could be an ally
against Islam, the greatest murder machine in the history?
If we
want to destroy this machine, we should not do what Hitler did: to be an enemy
of the Jews and to be a friend of their Islamic enemies.
Compared to Marxism, Islam is a significantly
bigger threat. As shown by Hitler’s example, a strident fight against Soviet
Marxism can be a cover for a big evil.
This
is a survival war.
If
America and Europe want to survive the Islamic and Marxist onslaught, they should
not do as Hitler did. Instead, they should enlist and embrace the collaboration
of Jews and Russians.
All
of them should get rid of any Hitlerian and Islamic feelings, views and
policies contrary to Jews and especially Israel.
And
they should be careful about a strident fight against Marxism, which was the
perfect cloak used by Hitler to fight the Jews. His spell of confusion is
powerful even today.
Union
with Jews (especially full recognition of the Promised Land as the God-given
gift to them and of Jerusalem as its legitimate capital) can save America,
Europe and Russia from an Islamic hellish future.
With
information from Jewish Virtual Library, Mein Kampf, The International Jewish
and Telegraph.
Recommended Reading:
Posts
