Showing posts with label Christian Broadcasting Network. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Christian Broadcasting Network. Show all posts

Monday, October 22, 2018

When a Televangelist Cares More about Weapons Deals than Human Lives for the Sake of Neoconservatism


When a Televangelist Cares More about Weapons Deals than Human Lives for the Sake of Neoconservatism

By Julio Severo
Christian Broadcasting Network founder Pat Robertson said the U.S. should not risk “$100 billion worth of arms sales” with Saudi Arabia after the apparent killing of journalist Jamal Khashoggi in a Saudi consulate in Turkey, saying that America has more important things — like jobs and coffers benefited by arms deals — to focus on.
Pat Robertson
He appeared on its flagship television show The 700 Club on October 15, 2018, to caution American evangelicals against allowing the United States’ relationship with Saudi Arabia to deteriorate over Khashoggi’s killing.
“For those who are screaming blood for the Saudis — look, these people are key allies,” Robertson said. While he called the faith of the Wahabists — the hardline Islamist sect to which the Saudi Royal Family belongs — “obnoxious,” he urged viewers to remember that “we’ve got an arms deal that everybody wanted a piece of…it’ll be a lot of jobs, a lot of money come to our coffers. It’s not something you want to blow up willy-nilly.”
“You’ve got one journalist — who knows? Was it an interrogation? Was he assassinated? Were there rogue elements? Who did it?...You’ve got $100 billion worth of arms sales...we cannot alienate our biggest player in the Middle East.”
I first knew The 700 Club in the late 1970s in Brazil and when Robertson’s name came, the first idea was evangelism and conservatism. I could never believe that someday his name would be connected to defense of arms deals and the Islamic dictatorship of Saudi Arabia.
Khashoggi, a Saudi citizen and longtime critic of the Saudi Royal Family, was a permanent resident of the United States, where he moved after determining that it was unsafe to remain in Saudi Arabia. Khashoggi spent the past year as a columnist for the Washington Post, where he regularly published incendiary articles critical of Saudi Arabia and its leadership.
Yet, if the killing of a dissident journalist is not so important as the U.S. arms deal with Saudi Arabia, what about 9/11? Of the 19  Islamic terrorists in this attack, 15 were from Saudi Arabia, according to the CIA. In 2015, one of the 9/11 terrorists, Zacarias Moussaoui, claimed several members of the Saudi royal family had been listed as al-Qaeda donors in the database he worked on under orders of Osama bin Laden, CNN reports.
Even CBN of Robertson, in a 2015 report titled “Saudi Arabia’s Role in Spreading Islamic Terrorism,” recognized, albeit timidly, that Saudi Arabia spreads terrorism. The kind of Islam that the Saudis spread is Sunni Islam, which is the most violent form of Islam against Christians.
In a 2014 article titled “Saudi royal family will not allow Obama to save Christians in Iraq,” Religious Freedom Coalition director William J. Murray said,
“The United States has been the ‘puppet’ military of the Saudi royal family, attacking and isolating Shia nations such as Syria. The Shia majority state of Syria, which protects religious minorities, is a target of the United States only because the Saudi royals are giving the orders, not the American people.”
According to Murray, under Obama, the U.S. and Saudi Arabia trained ISIS terrorists to attack Syria.
In a 2018 WND report titled “Russia and the Sunni Muslim threat,” Murray said,
“Currently the Sunni Muslim propaganda machine is everywhere inside the Washington, D.C. beltway. Money from the rich Gulf states, including the UAE and Saudi Arabia, floods the media and spreads political influence. Public remembrance of the Sunni Muslim attacks that have killed scores of Americans over the last decade or so has vanished, and even the 9/11 attack is hardly mentioned. The almost daily beheadings in Saudi Arabia are forgiven. Our leaders looked away as torture chambers were set up in the Ritz Carlton Hotel in the Saudi capital this year. The slaughter going on in Yemen by Saudi Arabian-backed forces is hardly mentioned. In the Washington area the Saudi Academy, which is a Sunni Muslim school for the children of diplomats from Muslim nations, teaches democracy is an apostate religion that must be destroyed. It also teaches Jews are descendants of apes and pigs and that women are the property of men. One former valedictorian was convicted after leaving the school of joining Al Qaida and plotting to assassinate President George W. Bush. Another graduate was arrested while attempting to board an airliner with a large concealed butcher knife. The school is 100 percent funded by the Saudi Arabian government. No American officials complain about the hatred being taught at the Saudi Academy.”
According to John Perkins, in his 2004 book “Confessions of an Economic Hit Man,” Saudi Arabia has a very special relationship with the U.S. since mid-1970s. He said,
“The evidence was indisputable: Saudi Arabia, America’s longtime ally and the world’s largest oil producer, had somehow become, as a senior Treasury Department official put it, ‘the epicenter’ of terrorist financing… Saudi largess encouraged U.S. officials to look the other way, some veteran intelligence officers say. Billions of dollars in contracts, grants, and salaries have gone to a broad range of former U.S. officials who had dealt with the Saudis: ambassadors, CIA station chiefs, even cabinet secretaries…”
So even Americans know about the indisputable Saudi role in the international Islamic terrorism. In fact, Perkins travelled to Saudi Arabia in the early 1970s as a U.S. operative and he knows the facts behind the scenes.
Now, for the sake of the U.S. arms deal with a nation that spreads terrorism, a televangelist is looking the other way because if the United States’ relationship with Saudi Arabia deteriorates, as Robertson recognized, thousands of Americans will lose their jobs in the military industrial complex, and billions of Saudi dollars will not come to the U.S. coffers.
Thousands of U.S. Christians have jobs in the military industrial complex. If the U.S. relationship with Saudi Arabia deteriorates, they lose their jobs. If it does not deteriorate, Christians in the Middle East and other parts of the world lose their lives as a consequence of the Sunni terrorism of Saudi Arabia heavily armed by the U.S.
It is very obvious that non-Christian Americans have sold their souls to the devil, in Saudi form, for the sake of bloody money. Have now even loved televangelists followed suit?
Islam from Saudi Arabia, not Iran, has killed more Christians in the Middle East than any other ideology. Even so, the U.S. has protected Saudi Arabia, not its Christian victims. Trump has badly failed in his promise to help Christians persecuted by Muslims. Instead of receiving in the United States thousands and thousands of persecuted Christians (often victims of Saudi and U.S. interventionism), the Trump administration has received in the first 6 months of 2018 just 21 persecuted Christians, vastly less than Obama. Yet, he has not failed in his broad support and protection of the Saudi dictators.
For Saudi oil’s sake, the U.S. is willing to sacrifice thousands of lives of Christian victims of Sunni Islam. And a loved televangelist approves it.
For Saudi oil’s sake, the U.S. is not willing to punish Saudi Arabia for the thousands of lives of Americans destroyed on 9/11.
What is the explanation for Pat Robertson to use his The 700 Club to encourage his evangelical audience to tolerate Saudi crimes?
Robertson praised the approach of Trump, who has publicly cast doubt on the Saudi crimes, comparing them to left-wing accusations against conservatives.
To justify Saudi crimes, both Trump and Robertson are looking the other way and comparing the Saudis to conservatives!
According to Vox,
“Robertson’s stance is in keeping with his wider, full-throated support for President Trump’s policies over the past few years. Since Trump’s inauguration, the Christian Broadcasting Network has become a de facto propaganda channel for the administration, running programs that, for example, suggest that Donald Trump was chosen by God to become president. In return, Robertson has frequently been granted rare access for sit-down interviews with Trump, during which he typically throws Trump softball questions.”
For the sake of bloody money, Trump is not imposing necessary sanctions on Saudi Arabia. Fearful of losing “friendship,” Robertson is not being a prophetic voice against the U.S.-Saudi bloody deal.
To support Trump in everything is a dangerous undertaking. Christians support King David in everything he gave a good example. But even he, who was a man after the heart of God, was not perfect. He adulterated with Bathsheba and had her husband killed.
If Christians would support David in everything, they would eventually support also adultery and murder, just because David did it.
If Christians cannot support David’s sins, why is televangelist Pat Robertson justifying Saudi crimes for the sake of Trump?
Even liberal Canada has condemned Saudi Arabia over human rights abuses. If liberal Canada can do it, why cannot the U.S. do it? Why cannot Robertson and other U.S. evangelicals do it?
Robertson has with Trump the same relationship that Nathan the Prophet had with King David. Robertson always have positive messages to Trump. Nathan had always positive messages to David.
Yet, when David sinned, Nathan was sent by God to give him a non-positive message. Has not Robertson been attentive to God’s voice to do for Trump the same thing Nathan did for David?
A relationship is only friendship when both parts are free and sincere to approve and disapprove the good and bad acts of one another. When the message is always positive, there is not real friendship, but only opportunism.
The flatterer flatters everything the flattered individual does right and wrong. A true Christian approves and praises everything that needs to be approved and reproves everything that needs to be disapproved.
If places were changed and Nathan were today before Trump, he would bring to Trump from God a disapproving message about Saudi Arabia, Trump’s appointment of homosexual activists and much more.
What would Robertson do about David’s adultery and his order to murder Bathsheba’s husband?
The U.S. has given no protection to Middle East Christians, but the military protection the U.S. has given to Saudi Arabia, whose Sunni Islam is a great killer of Christians, is a big offense against Christians in Middle East.
Kings and presidents need from Christians not only a sweet and positive voice. They need also a prophetic voice, which is not always positive.
May God raise U.S. evangelicals to be the necessary prophetic Nathan that Trump needs.
With information from NewsMax and Vox.
Recommended Reading on Neoconservatism:
Recommended Reading on Saudi Arabia:

Thursday, August 09, 2018

Giving Voice to Neocons is Weakening the Prophetic Voice of the Church


Giving Voice to Neocons is Weakening the Prophetic Voice of the Church

By Julio Severo
Last month, the Christian Broadcasting Network (CBN) gave voice to neocons in a report titled “‘He and Putin Seemed to Be Speaking From the Same Script’: Trump Draws Fire From Both Sides of the Aisle.”
The CBN report was obviously disgruntled at U.S. President Donald Trump meeting Russian President Vladimir Putin. And it did not choose Christian voices to express their views about this meeting. It chose neocon voices, including the main neocons in the U.S. policy: Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) and Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC).
According CBN, McCain condemned Trump, saying he delivered “one of the most disgraceful performances by an American president in memory.”
Graham called it a “missed opportunity by President Trump to firmly hold Russia accountable.”
It was clear that making peace or a partnership with Russia goes against neocon interests.
The problem is that to give voice to neocons is incompatible to the Gospel of Jesus Christ. By their own warmongering nature, neocons are incapable of peace. In contrast, Ronald Reagan, who faced the Soviet Union (which was communist and atheistic), sought peace whenever was possible. Now Russia has much more conservative stances. If Reagan was not demonized for seeking peace with an anticonservative Soviet Union, why demonize Trump for seeking peace and partnership with a conservative Russia?
McCain and Graham traditionally and consistently demonize Russia and praise the military industrial complex.
According to the Foreign Policy magazine, the military industrial complex “is a huge driver of U.S. jobs and economic growth. In 2017 alone, it generated $865 billion, supporting 2.4 million high-paying American jobs. The industry produced a positive trade balance of $86 billion in 2017, the largest of any U.S. industry.”
So the most profitable industry today in the U.S. is the military industrial complex, and its financial power successfully influences politicians and their politics, including the foreign policy and military adventures and interventionism.
Militaristic greed is moving the U.S. foreign policy. Greed is not a Christian virtue. It is a demonic vice.
Yet, instead of condemning McCain and Graham for their warmongering and exposing their demonic vice and militaristic greed, CBN gave them full voice. And this is very troubling, because when tricky journalists cannot express their radical views openly, they choose other voices to speak for them. This is what I call journalistic ventriloquism.
So have CBN used McCain and Graham to express their own neocon views? The name “John McCain” has brought ominous signs of judgement.
Why did CBN choose to give voice to neocons McCain and Graham? Who are neocons?
The Conservapedia defines “neocon” as:
“A neoconservative (also spelled ‘neo-conservative’; colloquially, neocon) in American politics is someone presented as a conservative but who actually favors big government, interventionism, and a hostility to religion in politics and government. The word means ‘newly conservative,’ and thus formerly liberal. A neocon is a RINO Backer, and like RINOs does not accept most of the important principles in the Republican Party platform. Neocons do not participate in the March for Life, nor stand up for traditional marriage, advocate other conservative social values, or emphasize putting America first. Neocons support attacking and even overthrowing foreign governments, despite how that often results in more persecution of Christians. Some neocons (like Dick Cheney) have profited immensely from the military-industrial complex. Many neocons are globalists and support the War on Sovereignty.”
To understand more about neocons, read: What Is Neoconservatism? Who are the Neocons?
Neocons attack Russia, even now that Russia is conservative, because they need a bogeyman to justify their perpetual wars, and even when there are no wars, they need to provoke some! They do not accept Saudi Arabia as such bogeyman, because the Saudi dictators are useful for their geopolitical militaristic greed, even though Saudi Arabia deserves all kind of punishment and sanctions for the 9/11 terror attacks, launched by 15 Islamic Saudis. The U.S. government has no courage to confront Saudis and their neocon allies.
There are several U.S. evangelical ministers who know the perils and threats from neocons, and CBN is in dire need of giving them voice. Because they love America, they oppose neocons and their perpetual greedy wars.
A nation protects its own borders. An empire deploys its troops to “protect” the borders of far-away nations and meddle in their wars. George Washington did the former. The current US does the latter.
While the U.S. keeps troops in the Middle East to protect Saudi interests and their bloody Islamic dictatorship, the U.S. borders are in dire need of U.S. troops for protection. The U.S. troops are not where they should be and they are where they should never be.
Jewish author Ilana Mercer has argued that “Inviting an invasion by foreigners and instigating one against them are two sides of the same neoconservative coin.” She views neoconservatives as having corrupted the constitutionally-prescribed use of the American military, employing it as a force “to patrol the borders of Kosovo, Korea, and Kurdistan” while “our own borders remain perilously porous.”
These “conservative poseurs,” Mercer notes, seek to remake America into “a disparate people, forced together by an abstract, highly manipulable, coercive, state-sanctioned ideology,” in effect, a “propositional nation” that overrides the traditional nation in which Americans shared language, customs, faith, and culture.
Mercer contends that “President Trump has normalized neoconservatism” in a manner reminiscent of “Bill Clinton's triangulation tactics.”
In 2016, both liberals and conservatives accused candidate Trump of isolationism and of being anti-neocon. Their consistent complaints prevailed: Today both the left and the right, argues Mercer, can hardly object to President Trump’s foreign policy interventionism.
Mercer warns that “with neoconservatism normalized, there is no debate, disagreement or daylight between America’s dangerously united political factions.”
Concurred with Mercer, the Conservapedia says:
Despite campaigning against endless foreign wars and a humanitarian-based foreign policy that promotes democracy, President Donald Trump appointed several internationalists and neoconservatives to his administration, including H.R. McMaster, who removed conservatives from the National Security Council. While some conservatives saw figures such as John Bolton and Mike Pompeo as also being neocons, they both see U.S. foreign policy as something that should benefit the U.S. first and foremost, and they reject democracy promotion and nation-building.
Alex Jones has claimed that neo-conservatives, as part of a deep state, have been fighting a civil war inside the United States Government in order to gain control of the government and influence President Donald Trump — himself, Paul Joseph Watson, and David Knight also claimed this throughout Infowars segments, and that the recent missiles launched against Assad were a result of the neo-conservatives attempting to control Donald Trump.
The military industrial complex profited $865 billion in 2017, but these profits do not include human loses: U.S. young men being used for war games and Christians being slaughtered in the trail of U.S. military interventions. While lives are lost, neocons fill their pockets.
Obviously, Trump was won after consistent pressure. But how evangelical leaders could help Trump against such hellish pressure if even they have given voice to neocons? How could CBN help Trump against neocons if CBN has given in to them?
U.S. Christians need the same anti-neocon vision Trump showed magnetically in 2016, but that he was unable to keep because of the power of neocons.
Christians have a higher power, and they should employ such power to confront and defeat the neocon ideology, which is as evil as Marxism is.
I urge CBN and U.S. evangelical leaders to seek the higher vision and power from God against the demonic vice and warmongering greed of neocons.
With information from CBN, Foreign Policy, Conservapedia and Wikipedia.
Recommended Reading:

Wednesday, August 21, 2013

After 9/11, Mosques Popping Up Across America


After 9/11, Mosques Popping Up Across America

By Julio Severo
Does Islamic terror bring mosque growth? The fact is that after the 9/11 Islamic terrorist attacks, many new mosques are popping up across the United States, and this growth defies logic and contrasts with the church growth movement, which had not connection to terror.
Virginia Beach, the famous headquarters of Christian Broadcasting Network and its equally famous “The 700 Club,” is now poised for its first mosque, the Crescent Community Center.
Turkish-American Culture and Civilization Center
In neighboring Maryland, the government of Turkey is building a $100 million mega mosque, the Turkish-American Culture and Civilization Center in Lanham.
Earlier this year, Turkey’s Islamist Prime Minister traveled to the US to attend the groundbreaking ceremony for the mosque.
Turkish Prime Minister inaugurating Turkish-American Culture and Civilization Center
Can you imagine the US government building a $100 million mega Christian church in Turkey? Can you imagine a US State Secretary travelling to Turkey only to attend the groundbreaking ceremony for the church?
No, the US government, whose nation was once a Protestant power, would never do for a Christian church abroad what Muslim governments do for mosques abroad.
While Christian churches are being destroyed on a near daily basis in Muslim countries throughout the world, the US government is investing millions of dollars to rebuild overseas Islamic mosques.
Can you imagine Turkey or Saudi Arabia investing millions of dollars to rebuild overseas Christian churches? While the US funds mosque rebuilding abroad, Turkey and other Islamic nations fund mosque growth in America.
The Clarion Project reports that about 1,200 mosques are now operating in the U.S., and almost 80 percent of them were built after 9/11.
The majority of those mosques are led by Wahhabi clerics — from the same branch of Islam that Osama bin Laden followed.
From America, they intend to spread mosque growth around the world.
Encouraging mosque growth is a strange way for America to fight terror, which is largely Islamic in nature.
With information from CBN News and Front Page Magazine.
Source: Julio Severo in English: www.lastdayswatchman.blogspot.com
Recommended Reading: