Showing posts with label Hollywood. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Hollywood. Show all posts

Sunday, August 16, 2020

Disney Confirms Its First Bisexual Lead Character in Cartoon Using Demons to Teach Girls How to Be Witches and Now… Lesbians Too


Disney Confirms Its First Bisexual Lead Character in Cartoon Using Demons to Teach Girls How to Be Witches and Now… Lesbians Too

By Julio Severo
It is not only witchcraft that is presented in the Disney Channel. Disney has confirmed a bisexual lead character on “The Owl House” series.
Luz Noceda, right, with Amity on "The Owl House."
“The Owl House” series follows the “adventure” of the 14-year-old Dominican-American girl Luz Noceda to becoming a witch.
Luz is not certainly Disney’s first character involved in witchcraft and she is not Disney’s first LGBTQ+ character. Pixar featured a gay main character in a short film on Disney Plus, but Luz is the first bisexual character to make a Disney debut on a television series.
Disney strategically chose Luz as a character from Dominican Republic (neighbor of Haiti), a nation filled with blacks and voodoo (witchcraft). And in voodoo, homosexuality, bisexuality, bestiality and even necrophilia happen under the spell of demons. And in witchcraft, homosexuality is normalized by demons who like it and lead their victims to it.
Disney’s strategy is to appeal to “diversity” through homosexuality and race. So parents, rightly concerned about a cartoon encouraging witchcraft and homosexuality to children through a black character, would be accused of “racism” if they tried to express their concerns.
There is in Hollywood a negrolatry and everything presented by a black character becomes “sacred.” So if you criticize voodoo and other similar witchcraft practiced by blacks, you are labeled a “racist” intolerant of blacks’ cultural and religious roots.
In my article “Theological Faggoting: Liberation Theology Producing Gay Theology in Brazil” I explain how Afro-Brazilian religions similar to voodoo embrace spirits (which in the Bible are identified as demons) that induce homosexual desires and prostitution in people.
The idea to put a homosexual character in a Disney cartoon was from Dana Terrace, the creator of “The Owl House,” who said,
“I was very open about my intention to put queer kids in the main cast. I’m a horrible liar so sneaking it in would’ve been hard.”
Terrace identifies as bisexual. She wanted to use the cartoon to present a bisexual character, and she really pushed Disney to meet her wish. She is white, but she understood that by using a black character to propagandize homosexuality she would be protecting her propaganda from conservative critics who run the risk of being labeled “racist” if they dare to criticize it.
Her fight to use her cartoon as a platform for her gay propaganda proves a point often denied by homosexualists: Gay activists use whatever means possible to propagandize homosexuality.
Sadly, the U.S. has no law to protect children from such propaganda and indoctrination. In fact, homosexual rights are above of children’s rights in the U.S. making Hollywood and U.S. embassies propagandists of the homosexuality.
In 2019, the Trump administration gave a high-level award to a Brazilian left-wing black sorcerer whose religion embraces homosexuality. If right-wing Trump is awarding this stuff, who can blame Disney for propagandizing this stuff?
Disney Channel’s The Owl House is about a teenager who finds herself stuck in the “Demon Realm” and battles alongside a rebellious witch against forces contrary to this witch.
The highlight of the cartoon is Luz’s dream of one day becoming a witch.
Luz dreaming of becoming a witch is a total incompatibility.
Although the name “Luz” seems innocent (Luz is Spanish for Light), due to the context of darkness it is not possible to avoid the memory of another name with an equally innocent appearance, which means “Bearer of Light,” better known as Lucifer, or Satan. When profiteers of darkness use light or other seemingly innocuous terms, it is always suspicious. The package always includes more things.
The Owl House is a disturbing cartoon, as it portrays the real and supernatural forces of evil as good — a direct violation of the Word of God, which says: “Woe to those who call evil good, and good evil; Who put darkness for light, and light for darkness; Who put bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter!” (Isaiah 5:20 NKJV)
This cartoon intentionally tries to expose the Disney Channel audience of children to the world of darkness and homosexuality.
“When [Creator] Dana [Terrace] first approached me, she said that ‘we’re trying to make this demon realm a part of Disney,’ which is something I didn’t think would happen,” show artist Ricky Cometa said. “We really wanted to make this demon realm feel like home, and just had to figure out how to do it.”
As The Owl House presents homosexuality and evil supernatural entities as good, children are unable to comprehend that this is wrong. In fact, media studies prove that children watching characters commit sinful acts, such as lying or stealing, will actually not recognize it as bad unless the character is immediately rebuked.
If witchcraft and homosexuality are not rejected and shown as wicked, children will not understand that witchcraft and homosexuality are wicked. So they will be indoctrinated into embracing witchcraft, homosexuality and everything else that left-wing ideologists promote under the cloak of negrolatry.
With information from CNN and Charisma News.
Recommended Reading:

Friday, May 22, 2020

Satanism Glorified in Hollywood: Superman Possessed by Satan in DC Comics Movie Produced by Warner Bros


Satanism Glorified in Hollywood: Superman Possessed by Satan in DC Comics Movie Produced by Warner Bros

By Julio Severo
If you thought that only in witchcraft Satan is represented as a good creature, DC Comics will persuade you to change your mind. In its most recent animation movie, “Justice League Dark Apokolips War” (2020), there is a powerful battle between the Justice League and a demonic force called Darkseid — Dark Side.
Darkseid is destructive and evil. He has destroyed or possessed many superheroes in this movie. And he intended to destroy the Earth. But Dark Side is not Satan.
John Constantine invoking Satan
To help the weakened Justice League to defeat Dark Side, character John Constantine (Hellblazer) invokes Satan with a pentagram.
Constantine is an occultist, a Satanist.
After the invocation, Satan appears.
Satan possesses Superman.
And Satan uses a possessed Superman against Dark Side.
The DC Comics animation movie “Justice League Dark Apokolips War” was produced by Warner Bros. While Hollywood seeks to erase Jesus Christ from the U.S. culture, it keeps glorifying the fallen angel, Satan, who oppresses people.
Hollywood very rarely recognizes the existence of Jesus Christ, and when it does it, it does not glorify Him. But often Hollywood recognizes the existence of Satan, and when it does it, it glorifies him.
“Justice League Dark Apokolips War” portrays satanism, occultism and Satan himself as good alternatives. The main public of DC Comics is teens.
A presentation of satanism as normal to teens is a strong sign that the culture has been Satanized. And there is only one way to unsatanize teen victims of such culture: To present Jesus, whose ministry was marked by three main characteristics: preaching of the Gospel, healing of the sick and expelling of demons.
If even in the Jewish culture, which was highly moral, conservative and Bible-minded, there were plenty of demons for Jesus to expel, what to say of the U.S. culture?
Jesus Christ is the real Superhero who can unsatanize teens victims of a Satanized culture.
And the tools Jesus uses to deliver people from Satan, his demons and satanizations is Christians who imitate Him by preaching the Gospel, healing the sick and expelling demons.
John Constantine
In the end of “Justice League Dark Apokolips War,” the Justice League is able to control Satan and Dark Side. But in real world, this is impossible.
The belief, glorified in this DC Comics movie, that occultists and Satanists can control Satan is illusory. Instead of dispelling such illusion in its teen public, DC Comics makes the illusion strong.
Superman possessed
Once a human being is possessed by Satan, only Jesus and no one else, can deliver him. Even a Superman, if such being were real, could not deliver himself from Satan. Even a Justice League of multitudes of superheroes could not control or expel a single demon. No human being has such power. Only Jesus has.
Recommended Reading on Hollywood:
Recommended Reading on DC Comics:
Another Recommended Reading:

Tuesday, April 28, 2020

Doctor Doolittle’s Mosque and the Nudist Neo-Pagan Who Talked to Demons


Doctor Doolittle’s Mosque and the Nudist Neo-Pagan Who Talked to Demons

By Julio Severo
As a little boy, I used to watch the cartoon “Doctor Doolittle,” produced in 1970 by DePatie-Freleng, which also produced the famous cartoon “Pink Panther.”
In “Doctor Doolittle,” I remember the animals. But I do not remember anything Islamic in the cartoon.
1970 cartoon “Doctor Doolittle”
So I was very surprised that the 2020 movie “Doolittle,” starring Robert Downey Jr., had a huge mosque, portrayed in several angles, as the central building in a fantasy island that was the original home of that new Doctor Doolittle. The big powerful mosque, built in a European style in its brick base, was a sign that the island was Islamic and that this new Doctor Doolittle was also Muslim.
Prominent mosque in the 2020 movie “Doolittle”
I know that Hollywood loves Islam and always portrays it in very positive light. But cannot children be spared such deceptive propaganda?
Prominent mosque in the 2020 movie “Doolittle”
Downey, who was executive producer of “Doolittle,” said that he inspired his character in a Welsh nudist neo-pagan physician called William Price, who allegedly could communicate with all spirits of nature and other spirits. The Bible calls these “spirits” demons. He said also that he used Price as an inspiration in his Marvel character Iron Man too. But he never explained why he put a mosque prominently in his movie or why he presented Doctor Doolittle as a Muslim.
Prominent mosque in the 2020 movie “Doolittle”
Still wondering why Downey would put a mosque in “Doolittle,” I decided to watch the 1967 movie “Doctor Doolittle,” starring Rex Harrison, to see if there was some huge mosque. After more than 2 hours watching and searching, searching and searching, I found no mosque and no Islamic sign of any kind in this old movie. So where did Downey get his inspiration for a mosque in his child movie?
What did he try to communicate with such prominent mosque in a child movie? That mosques and their ideology are innocent and proper for children?
What responsible people, especially people with media power, should do is to inform adults and children that Islam is not a religion of peace. Terrorists moved by this religion committed the biggest terror attack against the United States. The 9/11 attack was committed 100 percent by Muslims, most of them Saudis.
If Hollywood has no interest in what Islam has done against America, why ignore the about 100,000 Christians martyred year by year especially by Muslims?
This is a very cruel reality. Children should not be spared such reality. They should be protected from deceptive propaganda portraying Islam as an innocent fantasy. It is a murderous fantasy that has shed Christian blood for centuries. The Armenian Genocide is just one of the many blood stains in the history of Islam.
No ideology in human history killed so many people as Islam did. While communism killed 100 million people, Islam killed 600 million people. It should be banned. The lack of courage to ban this murderous ideology has resulted in the increase of mosques in the United States.
Yet, how is Robert Downey Jr. going to be worried about what Islam has done against America and Christians around the world if he is inspired by a crazy nudist neo-pagan who spent his day talking to demons?
Recommended Reading on Hollywood:
Recommended Reading on Islam:

Wednesday, April 08, 2020

Terminator’s Dark Feminist Fate


Terminator’s Dark Feminist Fate

By Julio Severo
Not surprisingly, the movie “Terminator: Dark Fate” was a total box office failure at its release in November 2019, even though Arnold Schwarzenegger is a Hollywood icon.
The movie featured women — Linda Hamilton, Mackenzie Davis and Natalia Reyes — as armed warriors fighting with the same physical strength as men against killing humanoid machines.
One of the women, a Mexican, was chosen by Hollywood fate to form a future androgynous army of men and women armed against these machines.
Macho women, and men as mere subordinates to Hollywood feminists. As villains, men are disposable. As characters on the good side — on the side of Hollywood feminists —, they are also disposable, that is, they are easily terminated. The movie makes it appear that women can by themselves solve everything on the basis of muscular strength and weapons against male villains. It is a feminist movie to please feminists’ tantrums and ideological greed.
It is not surprising the feminist flood in Terminator, as its producer, James Cameron, is considered a feminist, who takes pleasure in glorifying women in male roles. He is best known for writing, directing and producing the leftist environmental movie Avatar (2009).
Terminator was therefore created, with its masculinized women, according to the image and likeness of the feminism promoted by Cameron.
Another characteristic in the movie is profanity. There is a lot of foul language — which is the typical behavior of left-wingers. But what to expect from a movie by Cameron, a left-winger?
Cameron was raised in a traditional Protestant home (not open to the supernatural manifestations of the Holy Spirit), and later he became an atheist who seeks to attack Christianity. According to The Hollowverse website:
“Cameron has since attempted to debunk any claims of supernatural miracles in Christianity with his documentary film, The Lost Tomb of Jesus. The film claims to have found the remains of Jesus Christ, Mary Magdalene, and their children. Citing the names on the tombs and DNA evidence, the film seeks to show that Jesus was a regular guy who died and was not resurrected.”
Politically, Cameron is a left-winger who loves the militarism of the neocons in the Republican Party. Arnold Schwarzenegger is the contrary, but basically the same thing. He, who was the governor of ultra-liberal California, is a Republican neocon who likes leftism.
Apparently, then, women in Terminator are neocon left-wing feminists. But why did not Cameron give the central role in his movie to the queen of neocons, Hillary Clinton? As Cameron, Hillary is a left-wing who loves the militarism of neocons. When conservative Republican President George W. Bush invaded Iraq (an action condemned by Trump), then left-wing Democrat Senator Hillary supported the invasion.
With its feminist flavor, “Terminator: Dark Fate” does not once present marriage, family and husband and wife as even remote options for human beings in the future. Nor would it be possible for Cameron to present marriage in a favorable light, since he himself had 4 divorces.
Although he promotes feminism as a way of showing that he respects women’s rights, his 4 divorces are more than enough evidence that he has no respect for them.
His personal relationship with them is as distorted as his propaganda for them in male roles.
Reality is less generous and politically correct. It is, in the view of the male and female feminists, cruel. According to the scenario of the movie itself, the future will have no pharmacies and pharmaceutical companies to produce “contraceptive” drugs — which often cause micro-abortions. Women will then have their sexuality day and night free and open to pregnancy, which is a natural result of sexual activity.
So, the futuristic woman who wants to live the Hollywood style of free sex will have several pregnancies during her lifetime, making it impossible for her to live completely as macho soldiers and other male roles.
A woman who tries to live without marriage in a future without contraceptives will be a prostitute for several men, with pregnancies and children from each of them.
Women who choose marriage will be occupied with the traditional (and fully supported and defended by the Bible) role of caring for their husbands, children and home.
“Terminator: Dark Fate” twists the role of women. If women could be macho by punching men and leading armies of men, God would not have created Eve for Adam. He would have created another Adam.
If men were virtually disposable, as the movie shows, God would have created another Eve for Eve, completely dispensing with Adam.
In the ideologically charged view of Hollywood, women can play the role of boxers very well. And to elevate women to male positions, Hollywood is weakening or even terminating men from all their traditional male roles, especially leadership. For Hollywood, the time has come for women to lead the world in everything, including muscular strength and military actions.
However, God is not dependent on Hollywood and its spiritual and moral failures. Before Hollywood, there was God — Jesus Christ — and long after Hollywood disappears into the dust of oblivion, God will continue as King of the Universe.
In Hollywood’s dying vision, women are neocons, real war machines with no time for home, husband and children, but with plenty of time to have sex with men and punch them. But in God’s view, women can play the role of wife and mother very well without time to be neocons.
“Terminator: Dark Fate” had a deserved failure. It terminated the reality of the differences between women and men. It terminated the reality of marriage for the future. And in the process, it terminated itself as a work of public utility. It has become useless.
I am not surprised, as its director, who loves feminism and divorces against women, has a particular war against Christianity. In fact, the whole of Hollywood is at war with Christianity.
No matter how much Hollywood and its terminators fight against marriage and the differences between men and women to terminate the biological reality that God created, the Creator is greater.
It is impossible to terminate what has already been determined by God. Hollywood will pass away, but God and His Word will remain forever.
Portuguese version of this article: Destino Feminista Sombrio do Exterminador do Futuro
Recommended Reading on Hollywood:
Recommended Reading on feminism:

Tuesday, June 04, 2019

“London Has Fallen” through Muslims Who Cannot Be Identified as Muslims


“London Has Fallen” through Muslims Who Cannot Be Identified as Muslims

By Julio Severo
If I told you that the biggest Islamic propaganda machine is in Saudi Arabia, you would probably answer that it is normal for an Islamic nation to propagandize Islam.
But it is not Saudi Arabia or its Mecca that, by the way, loves Islamic propaganda.
It is Hollywood.
Take for example “London Has Fallen,” a 2016 Hollywood-produced thriller film packed with action. At first glance, as it was my case, you would think that the movie presents an apocalyptic scenario where London is so under Islamic control that even the U.S. president is not safe there anymore.
In this “at first glance” interpretation, “London Has Fallen” is not far from reality. With an Islamic mayor and the increasing problem of Islamic violence in its streets, who can say that London has not fallen? London is increasingly unsafe — by courtesy of its Muslim invaders. But you cannot describe the reality the way it is, because it is a politically correct crime, duly protected by a presstitute submissive to Islam.
By watching “London Has Fallen,” you cannot find the words “Islamic” and “Muslim” one single time. A terrorist, identified just as Pakistani arms dealer Aamir Barkawi, is tracked by the U.S. intelligence services, whose drone, when targeting him, fails to kill him, but kills his family in a wedding ceremony.
By revenge, Barkawi, who is never identified as a Muslim, kills foreign world leaders when they gather together in London. The U.S. president is hunted by terrorists, who are never identified as Muslims, in the streets of London.
With Muslims dominating London and all the United Kingdom, you would think that this scenario is very possible. In fact, it is increasingly possible.
During the visit of the U.S. President Donald Trump to the United Kingdom on June 2019, he complained about the nasty behavior of the London mayor, who is a Muslim.
Trump tweeted,
“@SadiqKhan, who by all accounts has done a terrible job as Mayor of London, has been foolishly “nasty” to the visiting President of the United States, by far the most important ally of the United Kingdom. He is a stone cold loser who should focus on crime in London, not me......”
“United Kingdom is COMPROMISED! Muslims dominate London and many other key government posts. Sooner or later UK will be just an appendage of Saudi Arabia.”
While they are just a minority, Muslims in U.K. are not much satisfied to control only London and other U.K. government posts, and they will use the democratic means to be nasty to those who defend the old Western, Christian values. But as soon as they achieve majority, democratic ways will be replaced by Islamic ways.
By the time being, U.S. presidents are not hunted in London, even though it is very doubtful that this is not the dream of the most Muslims in U.K.
In the movie “London Has Fallen,” there is no mention of Islam and Muslims and while British police officers and U.K. government officials are helping Muslims to hunt the U.S. president in the streets of London, it is worthwhile that most of these officers and officials are not Islamic. They are British. They are white. The movie portrays British whites as eager to help Muslims (who are not identified as Muslims) to kill the U.S. president for Islamic reasons!
Even though you may clearly identify the movie as made in Hollywood, you would think that it was directed by a Muslim. Exactly. It was directed by Babak Najafi, a Muslim.
So it is no wonder that “London Has Fallen,” even though with characteristics fitting only Islam and its adherents, it is not about Islamic violence. It is about revenge of a Pakistani arms dealer against the U.S. that killed his family in a drone operation.
The West, especially Hollywood, is giving Islam all the cultural weapons it needs to destroy the Western civilization, especially Christianity.
Hollywood just refuses to present Muslims the way they are. Even if Muslims hunt the U.S. president, Hollywood will present the hunters just as Pakistani arms dealers with no connection to Islam. And Hollywood will make sure that the movie, with many white terrorists, is directed by a Muslim to make sure that the movie is Islamically “balanced.”
If Hollywood cannot or does not want to portray Muslims as terrorists, who will be the scapegoat? Russians, obviously. In Hollywood movies, Russians are portrayed in every negative way Muslims cannot be portrayed: Terrorists, criminals, savages, etc.
As far as it depends on Hollywood, which is at the service of Islamic interests, the world will never know that “London Has Fallen,” that “Stockholm Has Fallen,” that “Berlin Has Fallen” and that “Paris Has Fallen.”
Because “Hollywood Has Already Fallen.”
Recommended Reading: