Showing posts with label Mark Zuckerberg. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Mark Zuckerberg. Show all posts

Monday, December 17, 2018

Does Facebook Reject My Recognition of Jerusalem as Israel’s Capital?


Does Facebook Reject My Recognition of Jerusalem as Israel’s Capital?

By Julio Severo
My Facebook profile (https://www.facebook.com/julio.severo) has been blocked for 30 days (beginning Saturday, December 15, 2018) because of my following post:
Jerusalem is the eternal capital of Israel. The United States and Guatemala, under evangelical presidents, have already made this recognition and have moved their embassies to Jerusalem. Russia made that recognition before Trump earlier this year but has not moved its embassy so far.
However, all such acknowledgments apply only to West Jerusalem. The United States, Guatemala and Russia only recognized West Jerusalem, leaving the Eastern part of Jerusalem unrecognized and open to negotiations to become the future capital of a spurious Palestinian state.
Benjamin Netanyahu, who is Israel’s pro-abortion and pro-sodomy right-wing Prime-Minister, has not complained about partial acknowledgments perhaps thinking half is better than nothing.
If [Brazilian President Jair] Bolsonaro recognizes the entire Jerusalem (both the western part and the eastern part) as capital of Israel, Brazil will outwit the US, Guatemala and Russia.
Full recognition protects East Jerusalem from falling into the hands of Palestinian terrorists.
I published this post on my Facebook profile and on all the Facebook pages administered by me on December 15, 2018. Facebook deleted this post in my page “Blog Julio Severo,” explaining: “We removed one of your posts because it doesn’t follow the Facebook Community Standards.”
How can a post defending Jerusalem as Israel’s capital be deleted as offensive when the founder of Facebook, Mark Zuckerberg, is a Jewish American?
I explained to Facebook that my post had nothing wrong, and Facebook answered “We’re sorry we got this wrong. We reviewed your post again and it does follow our Community Standards.”
My post was reinstated. This is Good News. But, at the same time, my personal Facebook account was immediately blocked for 30 days. This is Bad News!
I have sent this message to Facebook:
You had removed my post where I opined that Jerusalem is Israel’s capital. You removed my post in one of my pages, and blocked my account. I asked a review, and after some minutes you answered me this way: “We're sorry we got this wrong. We reviewed your post again and it does follow our Community Standards.” Thank for returning my post. Yet, you have not unblocked my account after the review. If, according to your review, my post does follow your Community Standards, there is no need to keep my account blocked. Please, unblock my account as soon as possible.
Yet, I have received no answer. My personal Facebook profile is still blocked.
Why does Facebook make such confusion to conservatives like me? Because the Facebook founder is Jewish, he should be able to understand my conservative views, which are based on the Jewish Scripture. For example, I defend Jerusalem as Israel’s capital because the Jewish Scripture does so. I oppose the homosexual agenda because the Jewish Scripture condemns the homosexual behavior.
Yes, I follow the Jewish Scripture. And I do much more: I follow a Jew called Jesus Christ. Is there something offensive to the Jew Zuckerberg when he sees me following the Jewish Scripture and the Jew Jesus Christ?
In spite of my faithfulness to the Jewish Scripture, Facebook has been relentlessly harassing me for my conservative stances. Since June 2017, Facebook punished me with its infamous 30-day blocks several times. You can find more information here: Facebook Censors Comment about Lesbians But It Does Not Censor Homosexual Comments against Jesus Christ.
Perhaps one of the most shameful acts of Facebook against me was to censor Leviticus 18:22, a famous Bible verse, among Jews and Christians, that I had posted on my profile, but Facebook did not like it and removed it. See my article: Help! Facebook Is Censoring Bible Verses
In this sacred verse God says: “You shall not lie with a male as with a woman. It is an abomination.”
This censorship against a Bible verse immediately became headline on WND (WorldNetDaily), in a report titled “Famous Bible verse too sizzling for Facebook.”
Because of this scandal, Facebook contacted WND with this message:
“As soon as we were notified of the problem, we began to investigate and restored the content as soon as we were able to identify the mistake. The content has been restored since it didn’t violate our standards. We’ve informed Mr. Severo of the restoration and apologized for the error.” (See the WND report “Facebook finally responds on censoring hot Bible verse”)
Yet, the Bible post was not restored and I have never received any apology from Facebook.
The only time Facebook ever backtracked on its harassment and bullying against me was when a conservative legal group in California sent a letter to Facebook. See: Facebook Acknowledges Its Own Censorship on Julio Severo. What Happens Now?
I do not know if Facebook’s simultaneous attitude of reinstating my pro-Jerusalem post and block my account is a deliberate confusion to avoid potential lawsuits by using, in the end, its standard excuse: “We’re sorry we got this wrong.”
What I know is such confusion always hit conservatives.
Willing or not, I am a victim of Facebook’s left-wing bias.
Recommended Reading on Facebook censorship:
Recommended Reading on the U.S. Left against Julio Severo:
Another Recommended Reading:

Monday, February 26, 2018

Help! Facebook Is Censoring Bible Verses


Help! Facebook Is Censoring Bible Verses

By Julio Severo
Facebook gave me a message on February 15, 2018:
We Removed Something You Posted
It looks like something you posted doesn’t follow our Community Standards. We remove posts that attack people based on their race, ethnicity, national origin, religious affiliation, sexual orientation, gender or disability.
Levítico 18.22:
Não de deitarás com homem, como se fosse mulher; abominação é.
The concluding text, which is in Portuguese, was targeted and removed by Facebook. This post had been originally published by me on June 2015 on my Facebook account and its translation into English is:
Leviticus 18:22:
You shall not lie with a male as with a woman. It is an abomination.
Willing or not willing, Facebook treated Leviticus 18:22 directly as a “attack” on “people based on their… sexual orientation, gender.” That is, Facebook treated the Bible as a criminal book!
Does Facebook guidelines warn its users that the Bible is a criminal book?
Does Facebook’s Statement of Rights and Responsibilities warn its users that the Bible is a criminal book?
Right now, I am under a 30-day ban by Facebook, since January 28, because on August 2013, I had published a post exposing the misuse of public funds by well-known homosexual group in Brazil. Facebook waited exactly 5 years to notify my exposé is “offensive.” So I am under a mandatory 30-day ban. This is the third ban in just six months. That is, 3 months of the last six months my Facebook account has been offline because of censorship.
What does Facebook have against the Bible and those mentioning its verses?
What does Facebook have specifically against Leviticus 18:22, a famous verse in the Bible?
Leviticus 18:22 is famous not only among Christians, but also among Jews. In fact, this verse was firstly written and addressed to the Jewish people.
By the way, Facebook founder and CEO Mark Zuckerberg is a Jewish American. Does he approve what his company has done against the Jewish Scriptures? Is he aware of what his company is doing against the Jewish Scriptures?
Or does he think that Facebook is now bigger, greater and more important than the holy Jewish and Christian Scriptures?
I am a follower of the holy Jewish and Christian Scriptures. Why does Zuckerberg have removed my Bible post and blocked my account?
George Washington, the first U.S. president, said, “It is impossible to rightly govern a nation without God and the Bible.”
Would Zuckerberg and his company remove his Bible posts if he had a Facebook account?
Sadly, current America grants excessive freedom to homosexualists — a nonsense never imagined by the U.S. Founders, including the first U.S. president, George Washington, who loathed homosexuality and expelled homosexuals, but never killed them.
As recorded in “The Writings of George Washington” (March 10, 1778, 11:83-84, U.S. Government Printing Office, 1934), George Washington ordered: “At a General Court Marshall … Lieutt. Enslin of Colo. Malcom’s Regiment tried for attempting to commit sodomy, with John Monhort a soldier … and do sentence him to be dismiss’d the service with Infamy. His Excellency the Commander-in-Chief approves the sentence and with Abhorrence and Detestation of such Infamous Crimes orders Liett. Enslin to be drummed out of Camp tomorrow morning by all the Drummers and Fifers in the Army never to return.” (information from William Federer.)
Would Zuckerberg and his company block Washington’s Facebook account if he were living today?
Facebook not only removed my Bible post of Leviticus 18:22, but also a post with a picture of an “Islamic Barbie.” Here is the picture:
Medical or Christian criticism of homosexual behavior leads to censorship on Facebook. But pictures of the communist criminal Che Guevara, who murdered people, including gay men, remain unshakingly throughout Facebook’s social network, as if his filthy image did not deserve banishment for his crimes. Facebook punishes innocent Christians just for their views, but it spares communist criminals who did not spare human lives.
Christian criticism of Islamic behavior leads to censorship on Facebook. But praises to the pedophile and killer Muhammad and pictures of Islamic dictators who murder Christians remain unshakingly throughout Facebook’s social network, as if their filthy image did not deserve banishment for their crimes. Facebook punishes innocent Christians just for their views against Islam, but it spares Islamic criminals who do not spare human lives.
For treating Islamism and homosexuality as “sacred,” Facebook has blocked my profile for criticizing Islamic violence and homosexual filthy behavior. If only Muslims and homosexuals are left in the world, whom will Facebook privilege and treat as more sacred than the other?
It makes no sense for Facebook to censor a Christian like me because as far as Islam is concerned, Christians and Jews are supreme victims of this violent religion. In fact, some 100,000 Christians are martyred a year. Most of these murders are committed by Muslims. If Facebook were serious about human rights, it would ban Muslims from its platform, inclusive Saudi Arabia, until they banned all torture and murder of Christians. This is the simple and sheer truth.
If Facebook were equally serious about human rights of homosexuals, it would ban Muslim nations. Muslims, not Christians, have a high record of torture and murder of homosexuals. This is the simple and sheer truth.
In 1919, the communist theorist Antonio Gramsci said: “To tell the truth, to arrive together at the truth, is a communist and revolutionary act.”
In the left-wing Facebook universe, if you tell a “communist truth,” it is a welcome revolutionary act.
The communist truth includes the sample of Marxist commandments that say:
* Homosexual acts are normal.
* Islam is peace.
* Christianity is oppressive.
* Leviticus 18:22 deserves to be removed from the Facebook universe.
* Criticism and mockery of Christianity are allowed.
* Criticism and mockery of homosexuality and Islam are not allowed.
I face new Facebook bans if I violate Facebook’s Marxist commandments. I face new Facebook bans if I post more Bible verses against homosexual depravity or the Islamic culture of violence.
Paraphrasing and reversing words ascribed to George Orwell, but actually authored more or less by Gramsci, I say, “In a time of universal Marxist deceit and censorship, telling the truth is a Christian revolutionary act!”
Recommended Reading on Facebook:
Other recommended Reading:
Recommended Reading on the U.S. Left against Julio Severo: