Showing posts with label John F. Kennedy. Show all posts
Showing posts with label John F. Kennedy. Show all posts

Thursday, November 13, 2014

Washington, D.C.: The Seat of the Immoral World Government


Washington, D.C.: The Seat of the Immoral World Government

By Julio Severo
While I am writing about the U.S. government as the seat of the immoral world government, the U.S. Department of State and USAID are hosting the third Conference to Advance the Human Rights of and Promote Inclusive Development for Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender (LGBT) Persons on November 12-14, in Washington, D.C.
Leading U.S. government officials are speaking at the event.
The conference is bringing together government officials, private funders, business leaders, scholars and homosexual activists from more than 30 countries to increase coordination, cooperation and resources dedicated to promoting the homosexual agenda around the world, and to ensure full inclusion of homosexual activists in political power structures.
The conference is focusing on diplomatic and foreign assistance strategies to address homosexual issues around the world. It is also discussing the best ways to engage faith communities to support the homosexual agenda and to integrate it into development programs.
If Sodom gave the world an untrained and unsophisticated homosexual militancy, America can be proud that she has surpassed Sodom, by giving the world an aggressive, trained and sophisticated homosexual militancy.
Will the U.S. government efforts to integrate the gay agenda into development programs and political power structures succeed? I fear so. Forty years ago, NSSM 200, a highly classified U.S. government document, made it clear that the U.N., the World Bank and many other major international organizations should be used to integrate population control into development and healthcare programs. Population control was presented as “family planning,” but its objective was never family well-being. It was population reduction to meet the U.S. ambitions to seize or save natural resources from other nations for current and future American use. Because of the U.S. efforts forty years, today “family planning” is as natural as marriage itself.
Evidently, now the strategy is to make the gay agenda and its fake marriage as natural as “family planning.”
God turned Sodom into ashes. America is distinguishing herself by making Sodom global and refined. She is spreading the Sodom ashes around the world to sow a new, bigger and global Sodom.
Days ago, Billy Graham said, “America is just as wicked as Sodom and Gomorrah.” And often he mentions, “If God doesn’t punish America, He’ll have to apologize to Sodom and Gomorrah.”
To advance the gay agenda, America wants to make the world as wicked as Sodom and Gomorrah were.
Brazilian conservatives often talk of a moral decadence of the United States as a direct consequence of the influence and actions of the Soviet Union, which was born in 1917. They treat the U.S. as if it were, before the Soviet Union, a pure damsel.
I had also such thought, especially as an evangelical being influenced by American missionaries. The fact is, we thought the U.S., especially in the early 20th century, was extremely Protestant. In the 1890s? Even more Protestant, even more moral, even more pure.
We have the historical record to support it. Upon signing the Declaration of Independence, Samuel Adams stated: “This day, I trust, the reign of political Protestantism will commence.” The 56 signers were mostly Protestant.
According to New York University Professor Emeritus Patricia Bonomi: “The colonists were about 98 percent Protestant.”
In less than one century, the reign of political Protestantism in Washington, D.C. was quite the contrary of what was preached by Protestant churches and ministers.
According to a DailyMail report, Washington D.C. in 1890s had a reign of prostitution. This was the capital of the most Protestant nation in the world, when Protestantism was much higher than today in the American nation. And remember: there was no Soviet Union.
The DailyMail report said, “The White House’s neighbors in 1890s included 108 brothels and 50 saloons.” Prostitution was rampant around the White House more than one century ago.
An author of that time, mentioned by DailyMail, made a map with an explanation of how 108 houses of prostitution were allowed to thrive so near the White House.
He said about Grover Cleveland (1837-1908), who was the 22nd and 24th president of the United States (1885-89, 1893-1897): “Grover Cleveland can sit in his bedroom window at the White House and survey the entire territory. He is within sight and gunshot of each of these 108 dens which defy the law which he is supposed to execute through his commissioners.”
If the White House were surrounded by 108 prostitutes, it would be awful enough. But 108 brothels? This is a lot of prostitution. Did not Washington, D.C. have any other more important activity to get involved in?
Why was prostitution, considered the oldest profession in the world, so rampant and close to the White House? Perhaps the answer is in what Ronald Reagan said, “It has been said that politics is the second oldest profession. I have learned that it bears a very striking resemblance to the first.”
DailyMail said that decades later this same area around the White House kept its notoriety for prostitution.
I do not minimize the Soviet influence decades after the 1890s. But there was a grave moral decadence around the White House before any Soviet influence. There was the influence of sin.
So the pervasive moral perversion in the current U.S. society, especially politics, cannot be attributed exclusively to the Soviet Union.
The Bible says, “Never dishonor your daughter by making her a prostitute, or the country will turn to prostitution and be filled with people who are perverted.” (Leviticus 19:29 GWV)
In the 1890s the U.S. capital turned to prostitution and, consequently, became “filled with people who were perverted.”
By the way, it keeps the old profile of place filled of perverted individuals. A WND report said that despite his sexual affairs in the White House, Bill Clinton has been ranked the most admirable U.S. president of the past quarter century.
In the subject of sexual affairs in the White House, John Kennedy apparently topped all the other adulterous U.S. presidents. Was his depravity in the White House a product of the Soviet Union, or of the same influence of sin in the White House neighborhood in the 1890s? I believe that latter would be the correct Christian understanding.
I hope that my article may help conservative Christians in Brazil and the U.S. to see that if they want to influence positively the global power that Washington D.C. has on the whole world, they should firstly understand that the moral problems in the U.S. government began much before the Soviet Union. Without such understanding, they will not succeed in praying and hindering a U.S. government that has made sexual perversion (sodomy) a top priority of its foreign policy.
The U.S. is homosexualizing the world by funding, training and sophisticating the international homosexual militancy.
America caused her daughters to be prostitutes many decades ago, her land fell into prostitution and now her land has become full of wickedness. Her government became full of wickedness, including sodomy.
The conference being held right now in Washington, D.C. by the U.S. State Department and USAID wants engage faith communities to support the homosexual agenda.
Perhaps the Washington National Cathedral is the best example of these ambitions. The 106-year-old cathedral has served as the spiritual center for the U.S. presidents, hosting funerals for Presidents Ronald Reagan and Gerald Ford.
In 2013, Rev. Gary Hall, dean of Washington National Cathedral, said that Christians should embrace religious marriage equality.
According to Scott Lively, the Jewish tradition says that gay “marriage” was the last sin before the Great Flood.
After its support for homosexual “marriages,” the National Cathedral in Washington will be hosting a Muslim prayer service for the first time on November 14.
Washington, D.C. and its State Department, USAID and its best Protestant cathedral are filled of wickedness and sodomy.
Portuguese version of this article: Washington, D.C.: A capital do governo mundial imoral
Recommended Reading:

Friday, April 27, 2012

Lewd behavior is no surprise in a culture of unrestraint


Lewd behavior is no surprise in a culture of unrestraint

US Secret Service and its dirty secrets

By Julio Severo
Colombia, the South American Thailand according to the US media, threw the presidential trip of Barack Obama in a scandal when some his secret agents engaged in prostitution.
The Colombia scandal erupted the morning of April 12, when a fight over payment between a prostitute and a Secret Service officer spilled into the hotel, local police and media.
The secret of the secret agents was exposed for lack of payment to a prostitute!
Several Secret Service officers have been forced out.
Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano assured skeptical lawmakers that what happened in Colombia was an “isolated” incident.
But an investigation is being made to check whether secret agents hired strippers and prostitutes in advance of President Obama’s visit last year to El Salvador.
This week, The Washington Post reported that Secret Service senior managers had tolerated similar behavior during previous official trips. The Post described a visit to Buenos Aires in 2009 by former President Bill Clinton, whose protective detail it said included agents and uniformed officers. During that trip, the Post said, members of the detail went out for a late night of partying at strip clubs.
In Brazil, Mariners serving the US Embassy attacked prostitutes and ran over a young prostitute last year. They were demoted as punishment.
Lewd behavior should be no surprise for a nation where Hollywood, the biggest propaganda machine in the world, reigns supreme in its movies shamelessly promoting prostitution in the name of “free love”. Hollywood teaches the world to have a good time with any girl. Any wonder about the “good times” of JFK, or Bill Clinton, or FDR?
Just try to talk about sexual restraint to a JFK or Bill Clinton!
In a recent book, Mimi Alford tells that her virginity was taken when she was a 19-year-old intern in the White House. The seducer was President John F. Kennedy. By some reason, the Secret Service was unable or unwilling to protect the teen intern from a serial adulterer, but successfully kept his lewd behavior a secret. Other lewd behaviors of Kennedy and other US presidents were also protected by the Secret Service. At least one of Kennedy’s mistresses, Mary Pinchot Meyer, was allegedly murdered by the CIA.
Mimi Alford was lucky to be left alive.
Having watched and loved Hollywood and known the sexual freedoms of their bosses, why could not Secret Service agents use some of this freedom too?
The Colombian prostitutes were lucky that they did not end as Mary Pinchot Meyer. But there is no doubt that the Secret Service would have had no problem in the South American Thailand if one of its agents had not fought over payment to a prostitute, turning their prostitution into a scandal that exposed a dirty secret.
But why so much fuss? The Secret Service has protected the immoral proclivities of US presidents, even by allegedly killing some of their mistresses, in a culture where Hollywood has imposed its debaucheries internationally as a norm.
Ted Kennedy, a late US senator and brother of JFK, rented an entire brothel for a night during a trip to Chile in 1961.  At the time, he had been married to his first wife, Joan, for three years. Had he and his brother some respect for marriage vows or morality?
Why should the Secret Service do differently?
Prostitution and sex without commitment are a blatant legacy of sexual unrestraint.
When a nation and its government advocate for unrestraint, they cannot expect a clean behavior from their representatives.
By rejecting her Christian and moral foundations, America cannot expect from her leaders a sexual restraint she is incapable of defending in her society.
With information from AP, Daily Mail, Rock Center and Estadão.