Showing posts with label Islamic terrorists. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Islamic terrorists. Show all posts

Sunday, December 08, 2019

Saudi who killed three and wounded eight had condemned US as “nation of evil” in hate-filled manifesto just hours before the attack. Six other Saudis were arrested, including three who filmed the attack. But initially the FBI “did not know” if it was a terror attack


Saudi who killed three and wounded eight had condemned US as “nation of evil” in hate-filled manifesto just hours before the attack. Six other Saudis were arrested, including three who filmed the attack. But initially the FBI “did not know” if it was a terror attack

By Julio Severo
The military Saudi who launched an armed attack in a classroom at a naval air station in Florida on December 6, 2019, killing three and injuring eight before being shot dead by officers, condemned the United States as a “nation of evil” in an online manifesto.
Mohammed Saeed Alshamrani, who was a Saudi Air Force aviator in a flight training program for foreign military personnel at Naval Air Station Pensacola, posted a short manifesto to Twitter where he claimed to be “against evil.” He explained that this evil was America.
“America as a whole has turned into a nation of evil,” he said.
According to SITE, a group that monitors jihadist media, Mohammed, who is a spelling of the name of the founder of Islam, wrote in this manifesto that he “hates” Americans for their supposed crimes against Muslims and “humanity.”
“I’m not against you for just being American, I don't hate you because your freedoms, I hate you because every day you supporting, funding and committing crimes not only against Muslims but also humanity,” he wrote.
The manifesto also condemned U.S. support for Israel and included a quote from Osama bin Laden, the Saudi founder and leader of Al-Qaeda.
Six other Saudi nationals were arrested near the base shortly after the attack. Three of the six were seen filming the entire attack, which the media called “incident.”
In their initial answers, the FBI and other U.S. law enforcing agencies did not know to say if the “incident” was a terror attack.
U.S. officials are not free to accuse Saudi Arabia, even when one of its own military officers was directly involved in the attack, because Saudi Arabia is the most important purchaser of U.S. weapons and sends thousands of military Saudis a year for training in America.
For 2019, Saudi Arabia sent 3,150 military officers for training in the U.S. at a cost of more than $100 million. Yet, the real U.S. profit comes from the Saudi purchase of U.S. weapons. Just in 2017, in his first trip to Saudi Arabia, U.S. President Donald Trump signed an extraordinary deal worth a total of US$ 350 billion of U.S. weapon sale to Saudi Arabia.
Such massive military trade deals can account for the hesitance of U.S. authorities to call the attack an act of terrorism.
The Saudi attack on a U.S. military base in Florida was not the first time Saudis attacked in the U.S. Of the 19 Muslim men involved in the September 11 attacks, 15 were Saudi and some of them attended flight school in Florida. The mastermind of this attack was Saudi Osama bin Laden.
Even though the victims’ families have launched lawsuits against the Islamic dictatorship of Saudi Arabia, the U.S. government has blocked such legal actions.
Interestingly, both the Saudi aviator and some of the 9/11 Saudi hijackers were trained in Pensacola, and the Naval Air Station Pensacola, which suffered the attack, is known as the “Cradle of U.S. Navy Aviation.” The repetition of the same problem in the same place shows that the U.S. has made itself extraordinarily vulnerable to Islamic terrorism.
Mohammed Saeed al-Shamrani hosted a dinner party with three other Saudis to watch videos of mass shootings days before the attack.
Saudi Air Force officers selected for military training in the United States are intensely vetted by both countries. Even so, they could not hinder Mohammed and his profound allegiance to Islam from bypassing the extreme vetting to carry out his Islamic terror act.
Despite the standard features of terrorism, U.S. officials began their response with the standard explanation that there was no evidence that the attack was terrorist. The biggest problem with telling the truth here is that the truth again incriminates Saudi Arabia, the world capital of Islam and Islamic terrorism.
The biggest “problem” that closed nations, such as communist and Islamic nations, face with Christians entering their countries is the concealment of their motive: preaching the Gospel, to speak of the love of Jesus. There are no cases of Christians entering a Muslim or Communist country with the secret motive of committing a terrorist act to kill Communists and Muslims. For example, Billy Graham visited the Soviet Union in the late 1950s and his prayer there was that the doors would be opened for the preaching of the Gospel.
Even if only a single case of a terrorism-motivated Christian arose, it would be the case of an isolated madman, because every year thousands of evangelical missionaries, mainly Americans, enter other countries to speak of the love of Jesus with no terrorist act.
Yet, in the case of Muslims, as much as governments carefully screen to sift out those with the slightest terrorist inclination, there are always Muslims to attack and kill innocents. These are not isolated cases. The “religion of peace,” as Islam is treated by presidents — including Bush and Obama — of western nations, insists on producing terrorists and killers worldwide. It is, by the way, the religion that kills most Christians in the world. There are about 100,000 martyred Christians every year.
The Islam that moved the Saudi military officer to kill at the U.S. base was not an isolated form of Islamism. Over 100 years ago, Winston Churchill said:
“The Mahommedan religion increases, instead of lessening, the fury of intolerance. It was originally propagated by the sword, and ever since, its votaries have been subject, above the people of all other creeds, to this form of madness… How dreadful are the curses which Mohammedanism lays on its votaries! Besides the fanatical frenzy, which is as dangerous in a man as hydrophobia in a dog, there is this fearful fatalistic apathy. The effects are apparent in many countries. Improvident habits, slovenly systems of agriculture, sluggish methods of commerce, and insecurity of property exist wherever the followers of the Prophet rule or live.”
The biggest problem Islamic countries face with the entry of Christians is Christians taking Bibles and the love of Jesus to share. The biggest problem Christian nations face with the entry of Muslims is Muslims taking bombings and Muhammad’s hatred. The clear difference between Christianity and Islam is that while thousands of Christians spread the love of Jesus in every country, thousands of Muslims spread Muhammad’s hatred in every country.
What are the U.S. and other western nations earning by receiving millions of Muslim immigrants? Terrorism. What did the nations gain by receiving American missionaries? Gospel, evangelical culture, culture of peace and civility.
Western countries, for their own sake, should ban Islam, which is the main ideology that drives thousands of terrorists worldwide.
Yet, it is too late. They are calling “religion of peace” the very cancer that is eating away their civilizations.
With information from DailyMail, FoxNews and WorldNetDaily.
Recommended Reading:

Tuesday, June 04, 2019

“London Has Fallen” through Muslims Who Cannot Be Identified as Muslims


“London Has Fallen” through Muslims Who Cannot Be Identified as Muslims

By Julio Severo
If I told you that the biggest Islamic propaganda machine is in Saudi Arabia, you would probably answer that it is normal for an Islamic nation to propagandize Islam.
But it is not Saudi Arabia or its Mecca that, by the way, loves Islamic propaganda.
It is Hollywood.
Take for example “London Has Fallen,” a 2016 Hollywood-produced thriller film packed with action. At first glance, as it was my case, you would think that the movie presents an apocalyptic scenario where London is so under Islamic control that even the U.S. president is not safe there anymore.
In this “at first glance” interpretation, “London Has Fallen” is not far from reality. With an Islamic mayor and the increasing problem of Islamic violence in its streets, who can say that London has not fallen? London is increasingly unsafe — by courtesy of its Muslim invaders. But you cannot describe the reality the way it is, because it is a politically correct crime, duly protected by a presstitute submissive to Islam.
By watching “London Has Fallen,” you cannot find the words “Islamic” and “Muslim” one single time. A terrorist, identified just as Pakistani arms dealer Aamir Barkawi, is tracked by the U.S. intelligence services, whose drone, when targeting him, fails to kill him, but kills his family in a wedding ceremony.
By revenge, Barkawi, who is never identified as a Muslim, kills foreign world leaders when they gather together in London. The U.S. president is hunted by terrorists, who are never identified as Muslims, in the streets of London.
With Muslims dominating London and all the United Kingdom, you would think that this scenario is very possible. In fact, it is increasingly possible.
During the visit of the U.S. President Donald Trump to the United Kingdom on June 2019, he complained about the nasty behavior of the London mayor, who is a Muslim.
Trump tweeted,
“@SadiqKhan, who by all accounts has done a terrible job as Mayor of London, has been foolishly “nasty” to the visiting President of the United States, by far the most important ally of the United Kingdom. He is a stone cold loser who should focus on crime in London, not me......”
“United Kingdom is COMPROMISED! Muslims dominate London and many other key government posts. Sooner or later UK will be just an appendage of Saudi Arabia.”
While they are just a minority, Muslims in U.K. are not much satisfied to control only London and other U.K. government posts, and they will use the democratic means to be nasty to those who defend the old Western, Christian values. But as soon as they achieve majority, democratic ways will be replaced by Islamic ways.
By the time being, U.S. presidents are not hunted in London, even though it is very doubtful that this is not the dream of the most Muslims in U.K.
In the movie “London Has Fallen,” there is no mention of Islam and Muslims and while British police officers and U.K. government officials are helping Muslims to hunt the U.S. president in the streets of London, it is worthwhile that most of these officers and officials are not Islamic. They are British. They are white. The movie portrays British whites as eager to help Muslims (who are not identified as Muslims) to kill the U.S. president for Islamic reasons!
Even though you may clearly identify the movie as made in Hollywood, you would think that it was directed by a Muslim. Exactly. It was directed by Babak Najafi, a Muslim.
So it is no wonder that “London Has Fallen,” even though with characteristics fitting only Islam and its adherents, it is not about Islamic violence. It is about revenge of a Pakistani arms dealer against the U.S. that killed his family in a drone operation.
The West, especially Hollywood, is giving Islam all the cultural weapons it needs to destroy the Western civilization, especially Christianity.
Hollywood just refuses to present Muslims the way they are. Even if Muslims hunt the U.S. president, Hollywood will present the hunters just as Pakistani arms dealers with no connection to Islam. And Hollywood will make sure that the movie, with many white terrorists, is directed by a Muslim to make sure that the movie is Islamically “balanced.”
If Hollywood cannot or does not want to portray Muslims as terrorists, who will be the scapegoat? Russians, obviously. In Hollywood movies, Russians are portrayed in every negative way Muslims cannot be portrayed: Terrorists, criminals, savages, etc.
As far as it depends on Hollywood, which is at the service of Islamic interests, the world will never know that “London Has Fallen,” that “Stockholm Has Fallen,” that “Berlin Has Fallen” and that “Paris Has Fallen.”
Because “Hollywood Has Already Fallen.”
Recommended Reading:

Monday, February 04, 2019

A Saudi Candy to America: A Saudi Sculpture and Flag Erected at the World Trade Center, Where 3,000 Americans Were Killed by Saudi Terrorists


A Saudi Candy to America: A Saudi Sculpture and Flag Erected at the World Trade Center, Where 3,000 Americans Were Killed by Saudi Terrorists

By Julio Severo
A sculpture celebrating the Islamic dictatorship of Saudi Arabia had been erected on the World Trade Center grounds on December, near the 9/11 memorial site. The exhibit included a Saudi flag.
Shaped to resemble a piece of candy, the nine-foot-tall statue bore the Saudi emerald flag emblazoned with the Arabic inscription, “There is no god but Allah, and Mohammed is the prophet.”
The Saudi exhibit at the World Trade Center raised questions because of longstanding accusations directed toward Saudi Arabia in the aftermath of the September 11 terror attacks. In 2003, hundreds of families affected by theses attacks sued Saudi Arabia over its alleged involvement in harboring terrorism — given that 15 of the 19 hijackers were Saudi. But the U.S. government squashed their suit.
The Saudi exhibit was set to remain at the World Trade Center until Feb. 28. But after protests, U.S. officials said that the exhibit would move to another location in New York.
Move to another location? This is not enough to change the fact that the Saudi exhibit is an insult to the memory of 3,000 Americans who were victims of Saudi terror.
Usually, a rapist who rapes children firstly offers them a candy and next rapes them. Saudis first “raped” America — if you can call 9/11 a terrorist “rape” — and now they offer America a symbolic candy! Devilishly “nice,” isn’t it?
There is only a problem in this analogy. America is not a vulnerable child at the mercy of a Muslim rapist. America not only is unafraid of wars, but even likes them. So it is no surprise that U.S. right-wing and left-wing presidents have been notoriously warmongers, in a lesser or greater degree. A minor problem with America awakens her always ready war machine to invade.
Why has Saudi Arabia never been invaded?
What hinders U.S. presidents — from Bush to Obama to Trump — from giving Saudi Arabia exactly what it deserves is the fact that the Saudi Islamic dictatorship is the greatest buyer of U.S. heavy arms. If it were not for this fact, Saudi Arabia would have been long ago bombed and invaded — not to mention that the U.S. government — from Bush to Obama to Trump — would stop shielding Saudi Arabia from lawsuits from American relatives of the 3,000 victims of the Saudi attack on the World Trade Center on 9/11.
It seems that the America controlled by neocons can waste 3,000 American lives, provided that in return she — actually, the neocons — gets a massive amount of cash — which the Saudis have been dutifully doing by purchasing untold billions in U.S. heavy weapons. If America gets really concerned about 3,000 American lives lost, she loses the deal. If she prizes the Saudi deal, she gets cash and a symbolic candy.
Certainly, when Saudi Arabia runs out of cash, neocons will keep Saudi Arabia accountable for all its crimes.
Meanwhile, America will welcome Saudi symbolic candies, provided that Saudi Arabia keeps buying tons of U.S. heavy arms.
Yet, my analogy about Saudi rape is not far away from reality. A WND (WorldNetDaily) headline says everything: “5 Saudi students flee U.S. before rape, murder trial.” Such blatant impunity is not happening under Obama, but under Trump, after he sold to the Saudis over 100 billion in arms. High cash blinds — and America suffers exactly this blindness. And what hope is there for such nation when even her powerful televangelists are blinded by the Saudi money?
With information from Fox News and Observer.
Recommended Reading on Saudi Arabia:

Sunday, February 11, 2018

How God Used Three Christian Young Men to Stop an Islamic Terrorist


How God Used Three Christian Young Men to Stop an Islamic Terrorist

By Julio Severo
God empowers Christians to do the extraordinary: Three Christian young men tackled a ISIS Islamic terrorist hellbent on slaughtering passengers on a crowded train, disarmed him and saved hundreds of innocent lives in a courageous act.
Alek Skarlatos, Anthony Sadler and Spencer Stone portray themselves in the movie “15:17 to Paris.”
U.S. Air Force Staff Sgt. Spencer Stone, U.S. Army National Guard Spc. Alek Skarlatos and Anthony Sadler, a California State University student, sprinted toward El-Khazzani, a 26-year-old ISIS Islamic African terrorist, as he pointed his weapon at them on a train from Brussels to Paris on August 15, 2015.
El-Khazzani was armed with an AK-47, a pistol, a box cutter, 270 rounds of ammunition and a bottle of gasoline during the high-speed railway ride to Paris. Knowing that at any moment, the terrorist could unleash his firepower and execute him on the spot, Stone tackled El-Khazzani.
Skarlatos wrestled the terrorist’s weapon from him. But the terrorist pulled out a box cutter and began slashing Stone.
All three men fought El-Khazzani and rendered him unconscious. Stone, Skarlatos and Sadler then tended to other injured passengers on the train until paramedics and police arrived.
The three young men made international news for their heroic efforts.
The three young men give all the glory to God for placing them on the train and preparing them for that critical moment. They have been friends since they attended Freedom Christian School in California together.
The mission statement of their evangelical school says, “Freedom Christian School is committed to providing a biblically-based, academically excellent education in a nurturing, family environment so its students can effectively accomplish the purpose for which they were created and impact the world for Christ… Students will know Jesus Christ as their Savior and their Lord, will demonstrate a desire to serve Him, and will be trained to live according to His teachings.”
“The odds of our exact situation happening to us are too astronomical to believe that it was just purely chance,” Skarlatos said. “I mean, we shouldn’t be here today, to be honest. I really think God had a hand in it.”
“It’s like we were training our whole lives for that moment without even knowing about it,” he said.
Stone, a trained paramedic who said he was raised in a Christian home and attended church every Sunday, added: “God, for me, is someone who is always there, who will always have my back – whether it’s a good situation or a bad situation.
“God is not going to put you through anything you can’t handle. I think that’s what I kinda fell back on in the moment on the train. At times, we’re vessels to be used by him to do his work. And it was an honor to do something that good. … I just want to earn the life we’ve been given by God.”
Anthony Sadler, who is the son of a Baptist minister, said he believes God not only put them there to save lives, He also planned use the men to spread His message.
“I feel like we’re just affirming God’s plan for our lives by being where we’re supposed to be on the train that day and just the things that have happened since. It’s all just another step in the bigger plan that we’re just not aware of,” Sadler said.
“As far as on the train that day, you can’t almost deny that God had his hand on us because so many things could have gone the other way. It’s divine intervention. I feel like we were meant to spread the story, and it’s meant to touch people.”
Now Hollywood director Clint Eastwood is, in partnership with Warner Bros., retelling their story in the new film “The 15:17 to Paris,” which was released in theaters on February 9. Eastwood enlisted the three heroes to play themselves in the film, which has more filthy language and partying than families anticipate.
According to Plugged In, in the film the three Christians are frequently shown drinking beer, misusing the name of Jesus and using profanity. They are shown drunk in a night club in Amsterdam, which is the European capital city of legal prostitution and drug availability.
In the film, all three guys get exceedingly intoxicated knocking down multiple shots of liquor. You see them groggily waking up at noon the next day (in their hotel room) complaining about their hangovers. Spencer smokes a cigarette in one scene where he makes a rather profound statement, and one of his buddies jokes about what he really might be smoking.
There is an obvious conflict between their Christian testimony and what the film shows. Perhaps such conflicted testimony is helpful to show that God is merciful when troubled victims remember Him in critical moments, and the Islamic attack was a very critical moment.
If God can use three imperfect Christians from America, the largest Protestant nation in the world, to stop an Islamic terrorist, it is obvious that He can use America herself to stop a very large number of Islamic terrorists.
So why is not He doing it? Because America has other plans and, governmentally, she is not behaving with Christian motivations.
In fact, because mainly of NATO’s misguided policies, Islamic terrorists have invaded Europe, where the three young Americans suffered the attack.
Let us get the facts straight.
Europe is under the protection of NATO, which was created by the U.S. government.
So NATO should have as its absolute priority to protect Europe from Islamic invasion, but it is not doing it because it does not want to antagonize Saudi Arabia, the Sunni Islamic dictatorship which is a powerful ally of the United States. The overwhelming majority of Islamic invaders in Europe are Sunni.
NATO has not taken its responsibility to protect Europe from Islamic invaders, but it has been responsible for the current massive wave of invasions.
* Under left-wing U.S. president Bill Clinton, NATO bombed Christian Orthodox Serbia to create an Islamic enclave, Kosovo, in the 1990s. This enclave, created by NATO and America, is an open door in Europe for multitudes of Islamic terrorists and all kind of trafficking.
* Under left-wing U.S. president Barack Hussein Obama, NATO attacked Libya, and as a direct result of this illegal military intervention, made exclusively to please Saudi Arabia, Libya is today a passage point for multitudes of African Muslims invading Europe. Before NATO’s attack, Libya was a hindrance for such invasion. After the attack, Libya has been under influence of ISIS and other Islamic terrorist groups. As a State Secretary, Hillary Clinton helped to send arms from Libya, through CIA operations, to Sunni terrorists in Syria to overthrow the Syrian government and slaughter Christians.
* Even though not yet directly attacked by NATO, Syria has been a victim of illegal military operations, including from CIA, firstly under the Obama administration and now under the Trump administration. U.S. conservative pundits as Ann Coulter have condemned such illegal interventions. In Trump’s case, Coulter has reminded that for years Trump clearly condemned Obama for intervening in Syria and promised not to imitate Obama. Under Obama, Syrian Islamic terrorists were funded and armed to overthrow the Syria government. Such invasive and illegal policy continues under Trump.
The act of the three American Christians was heroic. But NATO’s actions, spurred by the U.S., have not been heroic.
Three American Christians gave a beautiful example to America, as far as their fight against a terrorist is concerned. God can use America’s Christianity to fight and defeat Islamic terror. But first America should change her policy of supporting Saudi Arabia by funding, training and arming Sunni terrorists. Such policy is anti-Christian, because in the Middle East and Africa, Sunni Muslims slaughter scores of Christians. In fact, ISIS, which Trump said in 2016 was created by Obama, is fully Sunni and a machine of Christian genocide.
A truly Christian attitude against Islamic terror is for America under Trump:
* to leave her illegal operations and presence in Syria and make reparations for the years of illegal American interventions in Syria.
* to arm Christian populations in Syria and Iraq that were victims of ISIS. If under Obama CIA operations armed Sunni Muslims to slaughter Christians in Syria and Iraq, why cannot under Trump CIA operations arm Christians to defend themselves? This is fair reparation.
* to work to abolish the Islamic enclave to Kosovo and make reparations to Christian Serbia.
* to guide NATO to protect Europe from the invasion of Sunni Muslims. If Saudi Arabia and Turkey are displeased with this security arrangement, America should shun these Islamic “allies” and expel Turkey from NATO. In fact, what is Islamic Turkey doing in NATO?
America does not like illegal invasions in her own borders. So why has she supported and done such illegal interventions in other nations? As Jesus said, “Always do for other people everything you want them to do for you.” (Matthew 7:12 GWV)
America under Trump can choose to continue the disastrous plan of appeasing Saudi Arabia by letting Europe unprotected, under NATO’s nose, from Islamic invaders, or can guide NATO to attack and defeat Islamic terrorists, including those whom American has funded, trained and armed for a long time.
America can and should fund, train and arm Christians in the Middle East for self-defense against Islamic violence. The three American heroes subdued a ISIS terrorist because they trusted God and because they had been trained by the U.S. military. Christians in the Middle East need the same training. They need U.S. arms.
While the three Christian young men from America were used by God to hinder an Islamic terrorist in 2015 in an Europe unprotected by NATO, America under Obama was actively encouraging such terrorists through misguided and perverted policies. God can and want to change such course. He can transform America from a nation that equips Islamic terrorists to a nation that defeats them.
The God who used the three American Christians against Islamic terror can use America too.
The three Christian young heroes are an example and model for America, which should fund, train, equip and arm Christians against the Islamic terror machine.
Three young men impacted the world because they were educated in evangelical Christian principles, even though they had a hard time to live out these principles! But they remembered God in the critical moment.
Only Jesus Christ can do a transformation in the U.S. government.
With information from WND (WorldNetDaily) and Plugged In.
Recommended Reading: