Putin and the Night Wolves

By G. Murphy Donovan

Introduction by Julio Severo: Donovan, a former Intelligence officer, shows that the biggest threat today is Islam and that while the U.S. and Europe are focusing on a Russia that has restored Christiniaty in its national life, Islam and its hordes of immigrants are conquering Europe. While the West is oppressing Russia with wicked sanctions, terrorist Islamic nations as Saudi Arabia face no sanctions. Franklin Graham, son of the famed evangelist Billy Graham, has also said that the U.S. needs to join forces with Russia against Islamic terror. Read Donovan’s excellent article:

If nothing else, Vladimir Putin is a leader who paints Russia’s image with broad strokes. He overcame a KGB and Communist past to create a kind of democratic autocracy in Russia. He literally, and figuratively, restored Christianity and Orthodox churches across the land. In his spare time, Putin rides Harley Davidson bikes with the Night Wolves, Russia’s first post-Communist motorcycle club, an organization that might be the only state-sponsored political club for bikers on the planet.

The Russian president rehabilitated the Russian armed forces, too, in the wake of the Afghan/Chechen debacles. More recently, Putin has unchained the bear and altered the complexion of politics and dissent in the Caucuses, Georgia, Ukraine, and now Syria. Russian pushback against NATO expansion and regime change follies is a predictable, if not understandable, response to a hapless Brussels. Why European politicians seek a fight with Russia in the middle of an Islamic migrant blitz is a mystery to tacticians, strategists, and veteran diplomats alike.

The Russian president recently exposed Turkey, too, as NATO’s Achilles’ heel, a terrorist 5th column between East and West. NATO turned a blind eye to the Erdogan/Baghdadi oil cartel until the Russian Air Force began destroying northbound convoys. The CFO for the Turk/ISIS consortium appears to be Billy Erdogan, son of the duplicitous Turkish president. Across the border, Syria was another small war stalemate until Putin stepped in.

Russians still carry American astronauts into space, too, while Washington maintains spite sanctions against Moscow -- a testimony to Russian character and Obama era vapidity. With Putin, diplomacy is often just a door left ajar. The Russian space taxi serves Americans at NASA and affirmative action astronauts worldwide. The cutting edge of extra-terrestrial travel now requires a Kazak base and a Russian rocket.

Unlike European and American leaders, Vladimir Putin has no illusions about existential threats like open borders, Islamic imperialism, or religious fascism.

The Muslim world has been providing fighters to a half century of global jihad that targets and kills Americans and West Europeans with near impunity. Ironically, no Muslim nations are burdened with economic sanctions like those imposed on Russia. Indeed, America and Europe are now suffering from atrocity fatigue. Muslims continue to kill and maim while Washington and Brussels continue to rationalize global terror as the new normal.  

For apologists, calling Islam a “great” culture is the feckless rhetoric of enablers.

The boycott, divestment, and sanctions (BDS) movement against Israel is similar to the Russian sanctions, movements motivated by bias and historical bigotry. Just as Israel won a series of wars against predatory Arabs, the West won the Cold War with inept Communism -- and Europe still can’t take yes for an answer from a Russia that has reinvented itself.

Victory Day, celebrating Soviet success in World War II, has become the most significant holiday on the Russian calendar under Putin.

Unlike America and Europe; victory, success, and the need to oppose fascism, including the religious variety, are mainstays of contemporary Russian vigilance. President Obama is about to visit Hiroshima in Japan; he has declined invitations to celebrate Victory Day in Russia.  Of the WWII “Big Three” allies that defeated fascist Germany and imperial Japan, Russia sacrificed the most to defeat the Nazis and save Europe.  Russia may have to rescue Europe from itself again in the 21st Century.

While the Russian president cultivates “a never forget” ethic, the American president seems to never remember. Indeed, Barack Obama, as with Muslim history, seems to be ignorant about the legacy of uncommon cultures -- and the difference between friendly and lethal competition. If a liberal like Roosevelt could make common cause with Joseph Stalin and a conservative like Ronald Reagan could do business with Mikhail Gorbachev, how is it that a political footnote like Barack Hussein Obama can’t do business with Vladimir Putin?

The face of 21st century fascism is religious – and Islamic. There’s not much difference between secular and religious totalitarians. Coercion, terror, and atrocity are what they have in common.  Alas, Europe, with the possible exception of Brexit England, seems to be channeling early 20th Century behaviors that enabled National Socialism. Recall that Italy and Spain made common cause with fascism. France and Belgium rolled over like tarts, and most of Scandinavia allowed Hitler’s vermin to take control uncontested. “Neutrality” in Europe before and during WWII was another word for appeasement. In the North, the flavor was Quisling; in the South, collaboration was called Vichy. The EU and NATO are not about defense today so much as they are about flirting with similar historical folly.

The parallels between midcentury Europe and early the early 21st Century European Union are difficult to ignore anymore. Eurocrats seem not to have a clue about common cultural or common kinetic defense. Terrorists live cheek to jowl with oblivious Belgians. The European Union seeks to solve the 5th Column problem now by making Turkey an open border too!  

Some days it’s not difficult to conclude that clueless Europe and ruthless Mecca deserve each other. In the distant past, Islam was at the Gates of Vienna. Now the crescent and sword knocks on the doors of Westminster Abby. If common sense were currency, the European Union would be insolvent.

The loss of a clueless West Europe is sure to provide new opportunities for new alliances. Given the endemic chaos and aggression emanating from the Muslim world; Russia, China, and the United States might be the logical core for a new “big three,” alliance against 21st Century totalitarians. One of the most obvious advantages of a new global military coalition would be economy. Unlike NATO dependencies, the Chinese and Russians will surely pay their own way.

Ironically, China and Russia are already fiscal allies, in so much as both have emerged as a kind budget Viagra for the US Department of Defense. It’s difficult to justify “huge” defense budgets at the Pentagon if the real threat is 5th column migrants and terror driving a Toyota.

Only one candidate in the US presidential primaries suggests that small wars, strategy, and alliances should on the table in 2016. Hard as it is to forecast how such a discussion might go, any movement in new directions would be an improvement over the “new normal;” cooked threats, sanguinary inertia, and suicidal appeasement.

Time is not a European or American ally when conflict is a war of a thousand cuts.  

G. Murphy Donovan is a former Intelligence officer who writes about the politics of national security.

Source: American Thinker, via Last Days Watchman

Recommended Reading:

Is Trump a KGB Agent?

Putin, the Most Powerful Man in the World

Is Vladimir Putin’s Conservatism False?

Fast Islamization of Europe, with Christian Assistance

By Julio Severo

A liberal Muslim who backs homosexual “marriage” was elected the first Islamic mayor of London, the capital of England and one of the most important cities in the West.

Sadiq Khan, the first Islamic mayor of London

Sadiq Khan, the new Muslim mayor of London, said, “This election was not without controversy and I’m so proud that Londoners have today chosen hope over fear and unity over division.”

A Muslim teaching “unity” to a nation with a Christian past and majority?

His election victory was celebrated in a multi-denominational ceremony at an Anglican cathedral accompanied by Protestant, Catholic and Jewish leaders.

G.M. Davis, a PhD from Stanford University and the author of “House of War: Islam’s Jihad Against the World,” called Khan’s victory historic in a WND (WorldNetDaily) report. And he warned about Khan’s supposedly liberal views:

“While Khan advertises himself as a liberal and eschews orthodox Islamic positions such as Shariah law, he nonetheless represents the thin end of the wedge in the mounting political presence of Islam in Europe both within and without conventional political channels. A liberal Muslim candidate will in time give way to more orthodox candidates advocating Islam and all it stands for: polygamy, brutality against women and homosexuals, repression of non-Muslim religious groups, and all the hallmarks of Shariah that have marred Islamic history through the ages.”

The 2011 census reported one in eight residents in London is a Muslim and more than a third of the city’s population was immigrant.

These numbers do not include those born to non-white or Muslim immigrants. To explain this special case, I have interviewed Professor Rodney Atkinson, a British conservative leader who has given speeches in universities and public meetings in England and throughout Europe. He has written a number of books and been an occasional adviser to ministers and MPs, since 1981. Atkinson, whose brother is actor Rowan Atkinson (the famous “Mr. Bean”), runs the conservative British website Free Nations: http://freenations.net/

He said:

The main reason why Khan won in London was demography. London is no longer a British city. The non-white “British” make up about 53% of the population of London. Khan (standing for the Labour Party that have been buying the votes of immigrants by making the rest of us pay for their mass immigration) got 57% of the vote.

First, we lost London demographically. Now we have lost it politically. Next, we will lose it culturally. Then by language.

Muslims alone make up 6% of the population (officially) [of England. But] Muslim gangs have raped, and sexually assaulted thousands of white British children in Rotherham, Oxford and other places over at least 2 decades. As one Pakistani abuser of children said to a mother of one of the girls abused: “They are white trash. That’s all they are good for.” (BBC Radio 4 Today programme 19th September 2014.)

And the former Labour Home Secretary Jack Straw said that Muslim gangs found white children “easy meat.”

Tony Blair’s government and the Labour local authorities in those areas deliberately covered up the abuse.

In 2001 a Home Office researcher in Rotherham was sent on an “ethnicity and diversity awareness course” and told that she must “never, ever” repeat her findings that child molestation on a massive scale was being perpetrated in the town and the culprits were mainly gangs of Muslim men.

Obviously one could write a book on this evil. But never in the history of the world has a country — and a political party, mainly the Labour Party — presided over the cultural and demographic destruction of their own capital city.

G.M. Davis said Western politicians can continue to ignore the immigrant issue, but such sweeping demographic changes will revolutionize politics across the European Continent.

Khan’s victory comes at a time when his Labour Party is gripped in a crisis over anti-Semitism. Several of its members have been suspended for anti-Jewish posts on social media. Former London mayor Kevin Livingstone, a fiery member of the Labour Party nicknamed “Red Ken,” was recently suspended after he alleged Adolf Hitler was a supporter of Zionism before the Holocaust.

“Islam itself is profoundly anti-Jewish,” Davis charged.

While Khan is celebrating his Islamic victory in London, in Saudi Arabia Christians have no reason to celebrate. A Christian mayor of Mecca in a ceremony at its biggest mosque? This is completely out of question. Christians and Jews are not allowed to live in Saudi Arabia.

Why choose then as the mayor of London the representative of a religious ideology championing the worldwide persecution and murder of Christians and Jews?

Conservative candidate Zac Goldsmith said that Khan and his socialist Labour Party considered Muslim terrorists their friends and would handicap police efforts to prevent another attack on London, 11 years after 52 Londoners died in suicide blasts on three subway trains and a bus committed by Muslims. Goldsmith’s appeal, accompanied by a picture of the bomb-ravaged bus, was ignored.

Defense Secretary Michael Fallon said that London’s security would be jeopardized by Khan. His warning was also ignored and even despised by the mass media.

Even Prime Minister David Cameron, a conservative with liberal stances, decried Khan’s links with Islamic extremists on the floor of the British Parliament. His warnings were ignored.

The politically correct insanity is so widespread in the English culture that even the Conservative Party is not so conservative and much less Christian. Leading Muslim activists in this party expressed anger over conservative Goldsmith, saying his attacks on Khan were “racist” and “intolerant.”

Sadiq Khan, who legally defended a 9/11 Muslim terrorist who confessed to being a member of Al Qaeda, becomes as the mayor of London one of the most powerful Muslims in the Western world.

So to choose a Muslim is to choose “unity over division,” a victory against “racism” and “intolerance”?

That union, which is non-existent in Islamic nations, has been also championed by Pope Francis, who accepted the prestigious International Charlemagne Prize for promoting European unity with Muslim immigrant invaders.

Echoing the famous “I have a dream” speech by Martin Luther King, Francis offered his vision of a Europe that welcomes Muslim immigrants.

German Chancellor Angela Merkel praised Francis for sending “very clear messages.”

The pope said the Roman Catholic Church can play a role in “the rebirth of a Europe” with a larger Muslim presence.

Before the ceremony, Francis met privately with Merkel, as well as with European parliament president Martin Schulz, a previous Charlemagne Prize recipient, EU Commission President Jean-Claude Juncker and EU Council President Donald Tusk.

Juncker praised the pope for taking Muslim refugees to Rome with him at the end of his recent visit to Greece, making it clear that the pope gave the example for Europe to follow.

The Charlemagne Prize, consisting of a medal and a citation, is awarded annually for contributions to European unity. Previous winners include former U.S. President Bill Clinton, a notorious pro-abortion activist, and Pope John Paul II, a famous pro-life activist.

In his book “And Into The Fire: Fascist Elements in Post War Europe and the Development of the EU,” Rodney Atkinson says the Charlemagne Prize has original connections with Nazis and their efforts to unify Europe. Nazis, who were united with anti-Semite Muslims, were also anti-Semite. A Europe unified with a larger Muslim population will be a much more anti-Semitic Europe, a Nazi dreaming coming true.

Charlemagne (742-814 A.D.) was a European emperor who to keep Europe united made many wars, including against Muslims. If the pope and even Londoners were following his European unity, they would be fighting, not backing, Muslim invaders.

A true defense and unity of Europe could perhaps be accomplished by NATO, but it has been too busy fighting the fantasy of a communist Soviet Union that does not exists any longer, while multitudes of Muslims invade Europe, win the pope’s heart, get elected as mayor in one of the most important capitals in Europe and change its cultural and religious landscape.

This is the price of a pope, Europe and NATO chasing fantasies.

With pope’s blessing, Europe is under Islamization. Europe does not know what it is any longer and what it will be. But Islamic invaders know their mission, regardless if Europeans care or not.

With information from WorldNetDaily, DailyMail, Associated Press and Middle East Forum.

Portuguese version of this article: Rápida islamização da Europa, com ajuda cristã

Source: Last Days Watchman

Recommended Reading:

Islam, to surpass Christianity by 2070, will be only major religion to increase faster than world’s population

War between Christian Nations and Muslim Nations: A Table Talk between an American Economist and Young Muslims in Indonesia

Siding with the “religion of peace”: Obama, Bush, Brzezinski…

Germans Protest Islam, Leftwing Media Denounces Putin

Pope says equating Islam with violence is wrong

The Vatican and four Muslim leaders jointly condemned attack in Paris as European elites fear conservative wave

By Julio Severo

Four French Muslim leaders and the Vatican issued a joint declaration Thursday denouncing the Paris newspaper massacre.

The declaration stressed that dialogue among religions was the only way to eliminate prejudice.

According to the Associated Press, the Vatican has sought to mend relations with Islam that were initially strained under Pope Benedict XVI, who in 2006 made a speech that suggested Islam espouses violence. His suggestion caused storms of protest throughout the Islamic world.

Even though Benedict said he had been misunderstood and apologized, Muslims never again forgot his suggestion.

Of course, the “attack” in Paris, usually mentioned without any “Muslim” or “Islamic” adjectives, just proves that Benedict’s “suggestion” was sheer reality.

Yet, European socialist elites are not worried about Islam and its violent nature. They are, according to the Associated Press, worried that “Populist movements warning of the Islamization of Europe have been gaining ground across the continent, in small countries like Denmark and large ones like Britain, Germany and France.”

These elites denounce “the arguments of rightwing forces declaring Islam to be incompatible with Western values.”

Some of the strongest responses to the Islamic terror in Paris came from Germany, and the Associated Press promptly reminded its international readers that the Nazi movement was born in Germany, insinuating that opposition to Islamization equals “racism” and “Nazism.”

German chancellor Angela Merkel has condemned PEGIDA, an anti-Islamization movement, declaring, “There is no place in Germany for those who are instigating hatred against immigrants.” She also denounced the protesters for “racism.”

The AP report also mentioned PEGIDA, and again, promptly reminded its readers that anti-Islamization protests “have alarmed politicians in Germany 70 years after the Holocaust.” The AP insinuation: European, especially German, feelings against Islamization are the seeds for a Holocaust against Muslim. Hey, the first Holocaust was against the Jews, and Muslim were allies of the Nazis. How can AP, an American media, associate Islamic radicals with Jew victims? How can AP use the Holocaust against Jews to defend Muslims?

Actually, Muslims, who 70 years ago helped Hitler in the first Holocaust against the Jews, today have been committing a yearly Holocaust of Christian martyrs. Besides, a larger Muslim population in Europe is provoking a larger persecution of Jews throughout Europe.

Immediately after talking about the Holocaust, AP mentions Geert Wilders, the leader of the anti-Islam Freedom Party.

So for Merkel and AP and the general Western media, if you oppose Islamization in Europe, you are a racist, a Nazi and support the Holocaust!

In the PS (Politically Socialist) Europe, there is no place for those opposed to Islamization. But there is plenty of places for Islamists.

In the PS Europe, there is no place and tolerance for conservative values, especially Jewish-Christian values, in the government and society. But there is plenty of places and tolerance for Islamic values, including Sharia, which are expanding throughout Europe.

Rabid multiculturalism has delivered the European destiny into the hand of her Islamic executioners.

With information from the Associated Press.

Portuguese version of this article: O Vaticano e quatro líderes muçulmanos conjuntamente condenaram ataque em Paris enquanto elites europeias temem onda conservadora

Source: Last Days Watchman

Recommended Reading:

Pope says equating Islam with violence is wrong

Germans Protest Islam, Leftwing Media Denounces Putin