Tuesday, April 16, 2019

Confirmed: Olavo de Carvalho is the Rasputin of Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro. Leader of Bolsonaro’s party says that he is in love with Carvalho


Confirmed: Olavo de Carvalho is the Rasputin of Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro. Leader of Bolsonaro’s party says that he is in love with Carvalho

By Julio Severo
Immediately after the Brazilian presidential election last October, I warned, in my article “Jair Bolsonaro’s Rasputin? How to Weaken a Right-Winger,” that Bolsonaro could get trapped under the wicked influence of a Rasputin. The warning has been confirmed by one of the most important leaders of Bolsonaro’s party, who said that Bolsonaro “is in love with Olavo” — a reference to Olavo de Carvalho, a self-styled philosopher with a history in occultism and astrology.
In an interview with the Brazilian newspaper Estado de S. Paulo this week, Brazilian congressman Delegado Waldir talked candidly about what he sees threatening Bolsonaro.
Waldir is a gun supporter and he has travelled to at least 100 nations, from the entire Europe to Asia, United States and the entire Latin America. He is the leader of PSL (Liberal Social Party) in the House of Representatives in Brazil. PSL is Bolsonaro’s party.
Estado de S. Paulo asked him what he thought of the fall of the minister of Education. He answered that he “was minister because he was an olavete [adherent of Carvalho], indicated by Olavo de Carvalho. With the indication of another [minister] the president signaled that Olavo is very strong, because he is in love with Olavo, he remains in love with Carvalho’s theses, which weakens the technical and military sectors of the government.”
The Brazilian newspaper asked him, “What do you think of Olavo de Carvalho, considered as President Bolsonaro’s guru?”
In this point, I should add that even the U.S. government recognizes that Bolsonaro is dependent on Carvalho. In a recent report, the Voice of America, the official international broadcaster of the U.S. government, recognized that Carvalho is Bolsonaro’s guru.
Waldir’s answer: “Good-for-nothing. An individual who keeps giving tips about our country from outside. How many votes did he bring? What campaign did he do?”
Estado de S. Paulo asked him if he ever read some book of Carvalho, and he answered, “I do not have time to waste on it. And I doubt that President Bolsonaro has read just one of his books.”
The newspaper asked, “How do you understand this influence of Olavo de Carvalho on the president?”
Waldir replied, “They say he’s the right-wing prophet. He who brought the ideals of bolsonarism.”
The paper insisted, “And what do you say?”
He said, “All bullshit… It is unacceptable Olavo attacking PSL, congressmen, the government and the military — from another country. He has appointed two ministries…”
Estado de S. Paulo asked him, “What problems has the connection with Olavo provoked?”
Waldir answered, “The great friction that exists today in the government, the president’s decisions, are influenced by this philosopher Olavo de Carvalho. It is necessary to remove his influence from the government. Who should have influence is the president. [Carvalho] cannot be the tipster on duty,” adding, “It’s time for Olavo de Carvalho to stop giving tips to the government. Tips belongs only to lottery.”
In an interview with O Globo, another Brazilian newspaper, Waldir said,
— The field of influence of adherents of Carvalho [in the Bolsonaro administration is harmful], in my view, because of their very strong ideological position. They should exit the government so that the president may govern with tranquility.
— It is unfair for a group to have two ministries and attack the government, attack the military, attack the few existing groups within the government. (It would be good for them to exit) to pacify.
His interviews reveal that the Brazilian Ministry of Education became a chaos after Bolsonaro appointed a man indicated by Carvalho. The result was the fall of the new minister of Education after much confusion. But I had already warned that he liked Hillary Clinton and he disliked Trump.
It is not only Araújo who has connection to occultists. Carvalho himself bragged this week, “Steve Bannon and Wolfgang Smith think that I am a genius.” Both Bannon and Smith are adherents of the Islamic occultist René Guénon, who founded the Traditionalist School to fight Marxism. His most prominent disciple was Evola! And Carvalho himself has been promoting Guénon in Brazil for decades.
Occultists always praise occultists. And Carvalho and Bannon are not only praising one another, they are really involved with one another. In 2014, Bannon praised Guénon and Evola at a Vatican conference.
So is not it interesting that Carvalho, who has been a self-exiled Brazilian immigrant in the U.S. for over 13 years, has been praised not by U.S. prominent conservatives, but by two prominent controversial U.S. right-wing occultists?
Evangelicals were crucial for Bolsonaro’s victory, but his failure to recognize the evangelical importance is leaving his administration at the mercy of Guenonian opportunists, including Carvalho and Bannon. Sometimes in theory, he makes such recognition. In his recent visit to the U.S., he said to Pat Robertson that evangelicals were fundamental for his election. But in practice, he has given power to Carvalho.
And, yes, as confirmed now by Delegado Waldir, a prominent leader in Bolsonaro’s party, Carvalho has actually become Bolsonaro’s Rasputin. The original Rasputin kept the Russian czar, who was a conservative man, in such a spell that the Russian leader was in love with him. The result was chaos in the Russian government and, in the end, the victory of communism against a weakened Russian conservative government.
Should Brazilians expect better results while the Bolsonaro administration is under the same spell? I want to help Bolsonaro escape the tragic end that the czar had because of the original Rasputin.
I have written a number of articles about Carvalho’s wicked influence, in the hope that my warnings may awaken Bolsonaro. These warnings have annoyed Carvalho, who since January (the inauguration of Bolsonaro) has called on the Federal Police to investigate me on the allegation that accusations against him involving the Inquisition and occultism are collusions paid by the Russian government.
Yesterday, he shared a CitizenGo post asking the Bolsonaro administration to investigate “crimes” against him. Carvalho sees criticism against him as “crimes.” He has called a number of his critics, including me, as “criminals.”
He has reasons to be worried. Contrary to good conservatives, who are victims of fakenews from the left-wing media that fabricate lies and forged scandals about them, Carvalho has a history so filled with scandals, orgies, occultism, lies to his own astrology students and lawsuits from these students that the progressive press has no need to invent any fakenews about him.
Now does he want to punish those who expose his own dirty reality?
Should I remind that to justify censorship, punishment and even prison to critics, totalitarian regimes treat critics as “criminals”?
If it is a crime to say that Bolsonaro’s Rasputin defends the revisionism of the Inquisition, which tortured and killed Jews and Protestants, I am a “criminal.”
If it is a crime to expose how Bolsonaro’s Rasputin reviles evangelicals, I am a “criminal.”
If it is a crime to say that he has become Bolsonaro’s Rasputin, I am a “criminal.”
If he could, he would put all his critics in Gulags or reeducation camps.
And now that he has the power of a Rasputin over Bolsonaro, what is he going to do to Delegado Waldir, who has become a “criminal” by criticizing his vast wicked influence on Bolsonaro?
Carvalho’s specialty when he was a professional astrologer and actively involved in esoteric cults was to bewitch people. He keeps today the same specialty, including over a president.
Recommended Reading:
Recommended Reading on Olavo de Carvalho:
Recommended Reading about the Inquisition:

Monday, April 15, 2019

The Gargoyles of Notre Dame and the Islamic Celebration of Their Destruction


The Gargoyles of Notre Dame and the Islamic Celebration of Their Destruction

By Julio Severo
The Cathedral of Notre Dame in Paris, France, has suffered a massive destruction by fire on April 15, 2019.
Muslim immigrants in France celebrated its destruction. Because Islam has a tradition of destroying Christian temples, was the destruction of Notre Dame a Muslim attack? According to the CBN News, “The Paris prosecutors’ office ruled out arson and possible terror-related motives, and said it was treating it as an accident.”
The European problem is that whenever there is an Islamic terror attack, European authorities are swift to rule out terror-related motives.
From a cultural perspective, Notre Dame was a massive loss to the French civilization.
From a religious perspective, it was a massive loss to the Catholic Church.
In fact, the massive religious loss has other meanings too. Because the French have abandoned the Catholic Church in very large numbers, often there are no members to support old church buildings, which are eventually demolished or transformed in mosques. The French government and the Vatican do not want to spend their money to preserve such empty old buildings.
From a Christian perspective, Notre Dame represented no loss to real Christianity, because it is a cathedral consecrated to Notre Dame, a French name whose English meaning is “Our Lady.” The Apostles of Jesus would have seen as abomination a church dedicated to Mary, the mother of Jesus. They would have characterized it idolatry.
From a spiritual perspective, a place of idolatry was destroyed. And the destructive fire not only destroyed the idols of Mary and other men and women. It destroyed also Gargoyles — statues of demons. Notre Dames was filled of such demonic images.
Gargoyle of Notre Dame
From a cultural perspective, such statues could be interesting. But spiritually, why were there so many demonic images in a “Christian” church?
The use of demonic statues in Catholic building was questioned even by Catholic saints. St. Bernard of Clairvaux was famous for speaking out against gargoyles carved on the walls of his monastery's cloister:
“What are these fantastic monsters doing in the cloisters before the eyes of the brothers as they read? What is the meaning of these unclean monkeys, these strange savage lions, and monsters? To what purpose are here placed these creatures, half beast, half man, or these spotted tigers? I see several bodies with one head and several heads with one body. Here is a quadruped with a serpent's head, there a fish with a quadruped’s head, then again an animal half horse, half goat… Surely if we do not blush for such absurdities, we should at least regret what we have spent on them.”
Not only Notre Dame celebrated the mother of Jesus, but History shows that after thousands and thousands of Huguenots — Protestant men, women and children — were massacred in the infamous St. Bartholomew’s Day (23–24 August 1572), the French king who ordered their massacre celebrated it in Notre Dame.
Gargoyles of Notre Dame
So Notre Dame was marked by idolatry and celebration of massacres of Christians. What else could result from a church building with so many demonic images?
Gargoyles of Notre Dame
In my view, the demonic images and other idolatry symbols, including its name, should be destroyed from the famous old Catholic cathedral, because when idolatry is not destroyed, it destroys, as shown by St. Bartholomew’s Day massacre.
But the motivation of the Islamic celebration over the destruction of Notre Dame was not a concern for the spiritual purification of French Christianity, because most of France wants nothing to do with Catholicism. Their ambition is to destroy the French civilization.
Gargoyle of Notre Dame
The only salvation for the French civilization is to accept Jesus, who can deliver the French from the demons of Islam, religion, secularism and atheism.
Recommended Reading:

Wednesday, April 10, 2019

Nazism: Nationalism and Socialism at the Service of Occultism


Nazism: Nationalism and Socialism at the Service of Occultism

By Julio Severo
The Brazilian Foreign Minister provoked a national controversy when he defined Nazism as a left-wing movement. The controversy got international headlines, especially in Israel, when Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro, after visiting the Holocaust Museum in Jerusalem, agreed with his minister, even though the Jewish museum, a memorial to the 6 million Jews murdered by Nazi Germany during World War Two, clearly says that Nazism was a right-wing movement.
By making Nazism and socialism equal, Brazilian Foreign Minister Ernesto Araújo dismissed right-wing elements in Nazism. He ignored that the Jews, who were the main victims of Hitler, see Nazism as right-wing. And especially he dismissed the main influences on his own “conservatism” — which he calls traditionalism. You can read more here: Brazilian Foreign Policy: From Marxism to Occultism.
Araújo is not ashamed to admit that the main source of his traditionalism is the Islamic occultist René Guénon and his most prominent disciple, Julius Evola, a famous Italian philosopher. He was influenced by these two esotericists through Olavo de Carvalho, who for decades has been promoting Guénon in Brazil. Araújo is an adherent of Carvalho, Guénon and Evola.
Yet, when Araújo says that Nazism was a left-wing movement but he uses Evola as his “conservative” reference, he wages a war against common sense and embraces contradiction, because Evola praised and advised Nazis. Besides, Carvalho himself, who is treated as a master by Araújo, has recognized, “Nazism has left-wing and right-wing ideological elements.”
Guénon was anti-Marxist, and so was his disciple Evola. So how to define Nazism socialist if its name has “National” and it was advised by anti-Marxist Evola? Nazism persecuted the famous the Frankfurt School, which formed the current left-wing mindset in most Western universities. But the question that Araújo and others ask is: How not to define Nazism as a left-wing movement if its name has “Socialism”? This is a contradiction. But is not occultism rife with contradictions, confusion and chaos?
When you see the word nationalism, you imagine Trump’s slogan “Make America Great Again.” In contrast, when you see the word socialism, you just imagine socialism.
How to make sense from the apparent contradiction in “National Socialism,” the main Nazi slogan?
The reason is that Nazism was the most successful example of occultists using right-wing and left-wing imageries and elements to promote an occultist revolution.
So if you believe that Nazism was left-wing, you are right. And if you say that Nazism was right-wing, you are also right. But you would lose the point if you tried to define Nazism as exclusively left-wing or right-wing, because these ideological labels were only tools in the hands of occultists.
In his book “Hitler’s Cross: How the Cross of Christ was used to promote the Nazi agenda” (Moody Publishers, 1995), Rev. Erwin W. Lutzer, said that Nazism was an occult movement that used anti-Marxist propaganda.
Adolf Hitler was an occultist. So it is no wonder that he had Evola’s ideas and other occultists in his government. But how cannot you see that if Evola’s ideas is guiding the current Brazilian foreign policy, conservatism is, again, being used to exploit conservatives?
Connect the dots and you will see occultism again using ideological labels to promote itself. In a conference at the Vatican in 2014, Steve Bannon, who was expelled by Trump from the White House for opportunism, praised Guénon and Evola. Bannon is leading a nationalist and traditionalist movement. Read my article: Steve Bannon’s Occult Movement, Brazil and Conservative Evangelicals.
Bannon is also connected to Carvalho (read my article: Steve Bannon and Olavo de Carvalho Together: Two Occultists Promoting an Occult “Conservatism”), who is connected to Araújo.
Connect the dots and you will see occultists again seeking the control of conservative movements and governments.
In his remark about Nazism and socialism, Araújo said,
“It’s a subject I say a lot and it’s a trend especially from the left. It takes a good thing, hijacks it and perverts it, turning it into a bad thing. I think that’s more or less what always happens to these totalitarian regimes. That is why I also say that… fascism and Nazism are a left-wing phenomenon.”
But in Nazism, ideological labels are surpassed by occult interests. It would have been more helpful if Araújo had confessed,
“It’s a subject I say a lot (when I mention Guénon and Evola) and it’s a trend especially from occultism. It takes a good thing, hijacks it and perverts it, turning it into a bad thing. I think that’s more or less what always happens to these totalitarian regimes. That is why I also say that… fascism and Nazism are an occult phenomenon.”
If he had made such remark, he would have got right. Evola was the author of right-wing handbooks, including “A Handbook for Right-Wing Youth.” He was also the author of several occult books, including “Introduction to Magic: Rituals and Practical Techniques for the Magus.”
How can Bannon and Araújo conciliate their nationalism or conservatism with a sorcerer? In the same way that Evola conciliated right-wing rhetoric with witchcraft.
If right-wingers thought that only left-wingers could be fooled by occultists, the bad news is that they have been fooled too. And this is not the first time.
Occultists, including Evola, helped to develop Nazism by using nationalist and socialist labels to fool conservatives and socialists. After their scheme resulted in destruction, the public, without understanding the occult nature of Nazism, was left to fight over right-wing and left-wing labels.
In the discussion on Nazism, the public is incited to address only right-wing and left-wing labels and avoid the occult element behind the scenes. But it is exactly the occult nature that makes sense in everything about Nazism.
The absence of Jesus Christ in his life led Araújo to be drawn to Guénon’s and Evola’s traditionalism, through Carvalho. The same attraction happened in Carvalho and Bannon: Both were drawn to traditionalism through Guénon and Evola.
Nazism was occultism and Guenonian Evola was a part of it, just as Evola and Guenon are a part of Araújo’s traditionalism.
It is very tragic how prone Catholics are to occultism in its several forms and disguises. Guénon, Evola, Bannon, Carvalho and Araújo all have in common a connection to a nominal and powerless Catholicism. In fact, even Hitler was a nominal Catholic.
Trump identified Bannon as an opportunist, because he bragged that he, not conservative evangelicals, put Trump in the White House. In the same way, Brazilian Guenonians, especially Carvalho, think that they, not conservative evangelicals, put Jair Bolsonaro in the Brazilian presidency. Guenonians are by their own spiritual nature opportunists.
If Trump had not expelled Bannon, his occult revolution (a fake conservative revolution) would have advanced at the expense of Trump’s conservative evangelical base. Because Carvalho and his influence have not been expelled from the Bolsonaro administration, his revolution is advancing, at the expense of Bolsonaro’s conservative evangelical base.
I was firstly drawn to conservatism in the late 1970s and 1980s through Pat Robertson, Rex Humbard and their TV shows in Brazil. This conservatism has nothing to do with occultism and it has everything to do with the Bible. In fact, this evangelical conservatism empowers you, through the name of Jesus, to expel demons — and Guénon’s and Evola’s traditionalism is filled with demons.
The conservatism of Pat Robertson, Rex Humbard and other U.S. televangelists led me to the Bible. Guénon’s and Evola’s traditionalism leads victims to Satan and his deceptive propaganda.
May God deliver Araújo and Brazil from this dangerous propaganda.
Recommended Reading:

Wednesday, April 03, 2019

Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro said that Nazism was a left-wing movement after he visited the Holocaust Museum in Jerusalem. But the museum, which is a memorial of the Jewish victims of Nazism, says that Nazism was a right-wing movement. What about now?


Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro said that Nazism was a left-wing movement after he visited the Holocaust Museum in Jerusalem. But the museum, which is a memorial of the Jewish victims of Nazism, says that Nazism was a right-wing movement. What about now?

By Julio Severo
There was a big controversy about Nazism and socialism in the recent visit of the Brazilian president to Israel, and I will let Israelis themselves speak what they think. In a report titled “Brazil’s president says Nazis were leftists following visit to Yad Vashem,” the Jerusalem Post, a prominent Israeli newspaper, said,
President Jair Bolsonaro of Brazil said that Nazism was a leftist movement following his visit to the Yad Vashem Holocaust memorial in Jerusalem.
The far-right leader was asked on Tuesday during his visit to Israel if he agreed with the claim by his foreign minister, Ernesto Araujo, that Nazis were leftists.
“There is no doubt, right?” Bolsonaro replied, according to Reuters.
It is widely accepted that Nazism was a far-right movement. Yad Vashem’s website says that a range of factors, including Germany’s defeat in World War I, “created fertile soil for the growth of radical right-wing groups in Germany, spawning entities such as the Nazi Party.”
The Jewish Telegraphic Agency confirmed that Bolsonaro’s visit to the Holocaust Museum was clouded by a controversial remark of his “foreign minister, Ernesto Araújo, who claimed in a blog post that Nazism was a left-wing movement. Yad Vashem’s website says Nazism was a product of ‘radical right-wing groups in Germany.’”
Yad Vashem documents the Holocaust and is a memorial to the 6 million Jews murdered by Nazi Germany during World War Two.
Despite Araújo’s remark directly contradicting information on the museum’s website, Bolsonaro sided with him.
Yet, the Holocaust Museum is not the only Jewish institution portraying Hitler as a right-winger. The Jewish Virtual Library says:
… Hitler would make one of his passionate speeches that encouraged his supporters to carry out acts of violence against Jews and his left-wing political opponents. As this violence was often directed against Socialists and Communists, the local right-wing Bavarian government did not take action against the Nazi Party.
Hitler believed that the Jews were involved with Communists in a joint conspiracy to take over the world. Like Henry Ford, Hitler claimed that 75% of all Communists were Jews. Hitler argued that the combination of Jews and Marxists had already been successful in Russia and now threatened the rest of Europe.
If the Jews, who understand about Nazism as its direct victims, say that Nazism was right-wing, who are we to contradict them? Yet, asked by reporters if he agreed with Araújo, Bolsonaro said, “There is no doubt, right?”
He explained that the Nazi party’s name was the National Socialist Party of Germany, which includes the word “socialist.” The official name was the National Socialist German Workers’ Party.
Araújo’s notion, which is embraced by Bolsonaro, is that “National Socialism” was a leftist movement because it includes the word “socialism.” Political Scientist Kai Michael Kenkel said this connection between Nazis and socialism is akin to saying that the East German Democratic Republic and the People’s Democratic Republic of Korea were indeed democracies.
The same controversy was present in Bolsonaro’s campaign in 2018, when his followers said that Nazism was a left-wing ideology. The German Embassy in Brazil intervened in the controversy. In an interview with the newspaper “O Globo,” the German ambassador to Brazil, Georg Witschel, said it was “complete nonsense” to say that Nazism was a leftist political movement. The diplomat said there was consensus among German and world historians that Hitler was leading a right-wing political movement.
The German Embassy in Brazil posted a video explaining the culture of remembrance over the Holocaust in Germany. The video said that Germans “don’t hide from their past,” adding that “from a young age they’re taught to confront the horrors of the Holocaust.” The post garnered some 776,000 views on the embassy’s Facebook page, not to mention a number of contentious comments.
According to Deutsche Welle, the official broadcaster of the German government, the video was met with unexpected hostility from many Brazilians. Some insisted that Adolf Hitler espoused a left-wing ideology, others sought to deny the Holocaust.
Many of these Brazilians were enraged by the assertion that the Nazi party was a right-wing movement, pointing to its official name, the National Socialist German Workers' Party, as evidence that it was leftist instead.
Other commenters questioned the validity of the Holocaust, where 6 million Jews lost their lives. Brazilian Holocaust deniers took to the post to label the Holocaust a “holofraud,” which prompted the German embassy to respond.
“The Holocaust is a historical fact, with proof and testimony that can be found in many parts of Europe,” the embassy wrote in response to one post.
Deutsche Welle added that “Another argument plays on the statist economic policies of the Nazi regime, but this was also a practice of standard right-wing regimes, such as Spain under Franco and Brazil’s own military dictatorship from 1964 to 1985.”
There is a big controversy when the Brazilian president and his foreign minister said that Nazism was left-wing, but Yad Vashem, the Jewish Virtual Library and the German Embassy in Brazil said that Nazism was right-wing. How to make sense from this controversy?
I like the perspective of Rev. Erwin W. Lutzer, who in his book “Hitler’s Cross: How the Cross of Christ was used to promote the Nazi agenda” (Moody Publishers, 1995), said that Nazism was an occult movement that used anti-Marxist propaganda.
In this sense, everything makes sense. For example, Ernesto Araújo has written a diplomatic essay praising “traditionalism” (conservatism). He said, “To try to understand Trump, you should read the traditionalist master René Guénon, a major influence on Steve Bannon, former chief strategist of the White House and still central in the movement that brought Trump to the presidency.”
For Araújo, all the conservative aspects of the Trump administration were a direct influence of Bannon, who was influenced by the Islamic occultist Guénon. For him, to praise the Trump administration is to praise Bannon and Guénon. Obviously, he is wrong, because the conservative aspects of the Trump administration are evangelical, not Guenonian.
So Araújo tried to credit to Guenonian Bannon the conservatism of the Trump administration.
The most prominent disciple of Guénon was Julius Evola, who advised Italian fascist dictator Benito Mussolini and Nazism.
Guénon and Evola are prominent references in Araújo’s diplomatic essay against Marxism and defending “traditionalism.”
So, if Nazism was left-wing, as advocated by Araújo, why did it have a prominent anti-Marxist occultist as its adviser?
Occultists provoke confusions and chaos wherever they are.
Araújo is an adherent of self-styled philosopher Olavo de Carvalho, a prominent adherent of Guénon. Even Bolsonaro has propagandized Carvalho as the greatest Brazilian right-winger, even though Carvalho has said that he is not left-winger or right-winger.
You could label Carvalho a left-winger, because many of his methods are clearly left-wing. He reviles his critics in an approach that he himself admits was firstly used by Lenin. He also accuses others of what he does. He lies as a genuine communist. To say that the Inquisition was a myth created by Jews and Protestants and that smoking does not harm are two of his many lies.
Another controversial side of Carvalho is that he is known for his anti-Protestant diatribes, but he chose self-exile as a Brazilian immigrant in the largest Protestant nation in the world. Not different from the hypocrisy of Brazilian socialists who slam the U.S. capitalism, but they choose to immigrate to the U.S.
Araújo became an adherent of Guénon and Evola as the direct influence of Carvalho, who for decades has promoted and recommended Guénon, even though after I have exposed Guénon as occultist, Carvalho has feigned to reject him.
Araújo’s traditionalism or anti-Marxism is not based on Christian principles. It is based on Guénon. And Nazism and fascism were advised by Evola, an anti-Marxist occultist who was a disciple of Guénon.
If Nazism was left-wing, it follows that Evola was too, that Guénon was too, and that Carvalho and Araújo are too.
What can Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro get by being advised by Araújo and Carvalho, whose anti-Marxism is not based on Christianity, but on Guénon?
I commend Bolsonaro for his visit to Israel. I have prayed for many years for Brazil to get aligned with Israel. This is the reason why I and millions of Brazilian evangelicals voted for him. Israel and evangelicals have everything to do with one another. This is the reason why Israeli Prime-Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said, in his January visit to Brazil, “We have no better friends in the world than the Evangelical community, and the Evangelical community has no better friend in the world than the State of Israel.”
Despite that evangelicals massively voted for Bolsonaro, he has let Carvalho influence him. In his next visit to Israel, will Bolsonaro say that the Inquisition was a “myth” to please his Guenonian adviser?
What does Carvalho have to do with Israel? He is the most prominent advocate of the Inquisition in Brazil. He advocates its revisionism in the same way Holocaust deniers advocate revisionism. Both the Inquisition and the Holocaust tortured and killed Jews.
By accepting Guenonian advisers, Bolsonaro has put himself and Brazil in danger. The Brazilian right-wing trend of advocating the Inquisition has nothing to do with conservative evangelicals who elected Bolsonaro. This is the reason why I have been leading the evangelical effort to expose this trend.
If the Bolsonaro administration ends in disaster, evangelical voters cannot be blamed. But I fear that future historians will blame evangelicals, who love Israel, and forget about Carvalho, who loves the Inquisition.
After all, how many do historians today remember that Nazism and fascism were influenced by anti-Marxist Guenonian Evola? How many will future historians remember that Bolsonaro was influenced by anti-Marxist Guenonian Carvalho?
By seeing the word “socialism” in Nazism, and seeing Brazilian right-wingers labeling Nazism socialism, I believed it too in the past. But when I saw later the same Brazilian right-wingers vigorously defending the Inquisition, I began to ask: What is behind this movement? The answer I found: Occultism.
Occultism and anti-Marxism are a strange combination, but it has been used before — by René Guénon.
Occultism always provokes confusion and chaos. The same occultism that was behind Nazism is today behind Carvalho, Araújo and other Guenonians hijacking the Bolsonaro administration. They love the Inquisition and are opportunists in the Bolsonaro administration. I use the word “opportunist” because it was this term Trump used against Bannon when he fired him.
We evangelicals love Israel and we hate the Inquisition, the Holocaust, occultism and Marxism. We voted for Bolsonaro for him to support Israel and move the Brazilian Embassy to Jerusalem, not for him to make Guenonians great again.
Since Evola with Mussolini, this is the first time Guenonians have a chance to influence a government again.
Evangelicals, who love Israel, need to pray and watch, because anti-Marxist “traditionalist” occultism is preying again on unsuspecting conservatives. Perhaps Bolsonaro is one of its victims, but certainly he has been its main enabler in Brazil.
With information from Jerusalem Post, Jewish Telegraphic Agency, Deutsche Welle, Yad Vashem, Reuters, New York Times and Globo.
Recommended Reading:
Recommended Reading about the Inquisition: