Thursday, February 21, 2019

Trump Administration Seeks Legalization of Homosexuality Around the World While Children and Other Victims of Homosexuality Are Forgotten


Trump Administration Seeks Legalization of Homosexuality Around the World While Children and Other Victims of Homosexuality Are Forgotten

By Julio Severo
U.S. conservatives were shocked when they read headlines this week announcing that the U.S. government is spearheading an effort to decriminalize homosexuality around the world. This is a concern especially for the main base of Trump: evangelicals.
In its headline titled “New Trump push: Make homosexuality legal everywhere,” WND (WorldNetDaily) said,
“The Trump administration’s highest profile gay person is leading an effort to decriminalize homosexuality in dozens of nations where it’s still illegal.”
U.S. Ambassador to Germany Richard Grenell, who is a prominent homosexual activist in the Republican Party and in the Trump administration, was chosen by Trump to lead the decriminalization push. Grenell is married to a homosexual man and he has been fighting for homosexual privileges, including gay “marriage.”
Even though, in this phase, the U.S. government has said that the push involves no fight for gay “marriage,” the tone that the U.S. State Department has been giving to the homosexual agenda is very worrying.
WND said,
“Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, an evangelical Christian, is supporting the diplomatic effort to fight violence and discrimination against LGBT people, NBC said, citing U.S. officials. Pompeo declared in his Senate confirmation hearing: ‘I deeply believe that LGBTQ persons have every right that every other person in the world would have.’”
By saying that homosexuals have every right that every other person has, Pompeo betrayed the real intent of the Trump administration, because if every person has a right to marriage and adoption of children, Pompeo’s declaration suggested that every homosexual has a right to marriage and adoption of children too. It is, as he said himself, his deep conviction.
Such push coming from the Trump administration is a shame. Coming from an evangelical who is the State Secretary, helping homosexual activist Grenell, is a bigger shame, because he is doing exactly what left-wing Protestant Hillary Clinton was doing when she was also a State Secretary.
On the homosexual issue, the Trump administration is misrepresenting U.S. conservatives.
On the homosexual issue, “evangelical” Pompeo is misrepresenting U.S. evangelicals.
Under Clinton, the State Department had its Gay Pride Months. Now under “evangelical” Pompeo, the State Department has its “LGBTI Pride Months.” A whole month where U.S. government officials celebrate homosexuality in the U.S. and its embassies around the world!
Even if the push of the Trump administration addressed only violence against homosexuals, why prioritize individuals known for their bad sexual choices?
When I think about violence and homosexuality, the first thought coming to my mind is not individuals suffering violence for their sexual lifestyle. The first thinking is children suffering homosexual violence — physical and psychological. There is a massive effort to cover up the suffering of children in the hands of homosexual predators.
The Catholic Church is a living evidence of the gravity of homosexual violence against children. Young men with hidden homosexual problems enter Catholic seminaries, and even though they are never delivered from their homosexual demons and vices, they become priests and bishops. The natural consequence is that their homosexuality eventually produces sexual violence against children.
If you cannot hinder even a Christian setting where there is homosexuality from committing sexual violence against children, how does the U.S. government expect to protect a homosexual culture known for making children especially vulnerable to sexual abuse?
I have no doubt that George Washington, the first U.S. president known for discharging dishonorably a soldier because of his homosexual behavior, would never accept a “LGBTI Pride Month” in the State Department. Instead, he would launch a “Month of Protection of Children Against Homosexual Propaganda and Violence.” He would also launch a push to encourage nations to protect children and teens from homosexual propaganda and its psychological and physical violence.
Putin’s Russia has given a very good example by enacting in 2013 a law banning homosexual propaganda to children. The Obama administration, which was busy celebrating homosexuality in its State Department and engaged in efforts to decriminalize homosexuality around the world, growled at the Russian law and used the Ukrainian issue as a pretext to impose sanctions on Russia.
With Trump, my expectation was that he would use the U.S. government to do much more than Russia against the powerful homosexual agenda and its predatory threat to children. Yet, in many ways and year after year Trump, his administration and his State Department are doing more and more to imitate Obama and his obsession to celebrate homosexuality.
Obama never was worried about children and their protection against the predatory threat of homosexual propaganda. Trump and “evangelical” Pompeo never showed any such worry too. No “Month of Protection of Children Against Homosexual Propaganda and Violence.”
All of them are interested in protecting a predatory sexual behavior that brought God’s judgment to Sodom as an example of societies that would choose homosexuality as their official lifestyle. The U.S., under Obama and Trump, are not only celebrating and protecting this perverted lifestyle, but the Obama administration worked and the Trump administration has been working to spread the celebration and protection of this lifestyle that even today is bringing big curses to the Catholic Church and eventually bring bigger curses and destruction to societies that insist on embracing what God has always condemned.
God has said,
“You shall not lie with a male as with a woman; it is an abomination.” (Leviticus 18:22 ESV)
“What happened to Sodom and Gomorrah and the cities near them is an example for us of the punishment of eternal fire. The people of these cities suffered the same fate that God’s people and the angels did, because they committed sexual sins and engaged in homosexual activities.” (Jude 1:7 GWV)
May evangelicals who elected Trump pray for him to stop imitating Obama. And may they ask him to oust homosexual activist Richard Grenell from his administration and “evangelical” Mike Pompeo from his State Department and appoint evangelicals who may be able to celebrate a “Month of Protection of Children Against Homosexual Propaganda and Violence” in the State Department and launch an international push with such good example.
Conservatives and evangelicals, in the U.S. and around the world, expect no less than this from America.
Recommended Reading:

Tuesday, February 12, 2019

Brazil’s Bolsonaro Administration Sees Catholic Church as Potential Opposition


Brazil’s Bolsonaro Administration Sees Catholic Church as Potential Opposition

By Julio Severo
The Bolsonaro administration in Brazil wants to restrain, according to Brazilian newspaper Estadão, what it considers the opposition of the Catholic Church, in the vacuum of the defeat and loss of the Workers’ Party and other left-wing parties. In the evaluation of officials of President Jair Bolsonaro, the Catholic Church is a traditional ally of the Workers’ Party (WP) and it is articulating itself to influence debates previously dominated by WP in the countryside of Brazil and in suburbs.
The alert to the Bolsonaro administration came from reports of the Brazilian Intelligence Agency (Abin) and military leaders. These reports have mentioned recent meetings of Brazilian cardinals with Pope Francis in the Vatican.
“We are worried and we want to neutralize it,” said Augusto Heleno, chief minister of the Institutional Security Office (ISO), who heads the counter-offensive.
Based on documents circulating within the Bolsonaro administration, the ISO’s military officials have judged that left-leaning sectors of the Catholic Church, members of the so-called “progressive clergy,” intend to take advantage of meetings with the pope to criticize the Bolsonaro administration and get international impact.
“We think this is interference in Brazil’s internal affairs,” said Heleno. As a reaction, ISO plans to involve, according to Estadão, the Itamaraty [the Brazilian foreign affair ministry], which is under the control of an olavete, to monitor Brazilian Catholic leaders during their trips to the Vatican.
As soon as Abin’s first communication reached the top officials of the Bolsonaro administration, generals immediately made a connection with the criticism of the National Conference of Brazilian Bishops (NCBB) to Bolsonaro during the election campaign. Groups linked to the NCBB, such as the Indigenous Missionary Council and the Land Pastoral Commission, spared no attacks, which continued after Bolsonaro’s election and inauguration. All of them are historical allies of the Workers’ Party. The Prison Pastoral, for example, issued a press release last week criticizing the anticrime measures of the Minister of Justice, Sérgio Moro, who, as judge, condemned former president Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva in the Car Washing operation.
In the electoral campaign, Land Pastoral issued a report by Bishop André de Witte of Bahia, who mentioned Bolsonaro as a “real danger.” Bolsonaro’s support networks countered by spreading on the internet that Pope Francisco was “communist.”
Although considering himself Catholic, Bolsonaro was unable to obtain the support of the NCBB, which is Brazil’s largest Catholic force, but invested heavily and incessantly in the support of evangelicals, especially Rev. Silas Malafaia, during the elections.
However, after getting elected, he abandoned his preference for evangelicals and opted for placing above evangelicals militant olavetes, as adherents of astrologer Olavo de Carvalho are called. Because of this change of preference, several ministries of great importance became a source of jobs to olavetes, just as in the past they were a source of jobs to socialist militants.
The only evangelical in high level in the Bolsonaro administration is Pastor Damares Alves, who heads the Ministry of Women, Family and Human Rights. But she, as an evangelical, is visibly disadvantaged compared to the large number of olavetes in more important government positions. It is a harmful disadvantage, on the part of the Bolsonaro administration, as it goes directly against its evangelical voters, who are seen by astrologer Carvalho as worse than Marxists, according to his statement in September 2018.
The Bolsonaro administration and its intelligence agencies, especially Abin, correctly analyzed when they saw the Catholic Church as a potential opponent. There is a Catholic tradition of connection to the left occurring not only in Brazil but also throughout Latin America. The most Catholic countries in Latin America are, coincidentally or not, also the most socialist. Cuba, Venezuela and Bolivia are ultra-Catholic countries that have experienced a strong leftist advance precisely because of leftist Catholic influence.
Brazil has not fallen into this leftist-Catholic tradition because of the advance of evangelical churches, which supported Bolsonaro because they saw conservative qualities in him, especially in the issues of abortion and homosexuality, which are aligned with their conservative, Bible-based views.
This conservative trend is by no means unique to Brazil. It is seen throughout Latin America, where countries influenced by evangelical conservatism lead their governments to move their embassies to Jerusalem. A major example is Guatemala, the first nation in Latin America, and the second country in the world after the United States, to move its embassy to Jerusalem. The president of Guatemala is evangelical and almost 50 percent of the Guatemalan population today is evangelical. The more evangelical a country is, the more conservative and pro-Israel it is.
Bolsonaro did very well by rejecting the radicalism of left-wing Catholics, especially the NCBB.
Yet, by giving preference to olavetes, who are syncretic Catholics who embrace a kind of esoteric fascism, to the detriment of evangelicals who strongly supported him, Bolsonaro is playing a strange game with his constituents. This game involves manipulation and opportunism.
If it is not right to give preference to evangelical supporters, why give preference to olavetes’ fascism, which defends the Inquisition, who tortured and killed Jews and Protestants?
If Bolsonaro thought that astrologer Carvalho was enough to elect him, why before the election did he give preference to evangelicals? After his election was won, why did he change his stance, giving preference to olavetes?
If it was not right for former socialist presidents Lula and Dilma to turn the Brazilian government into a big source of jobs for left-wing militants, why would it now be right to turn the Brazilian government into a big source of jobs for olavete militants?
In addition, there is the problem of external interference. Steve Bannon said last week that a senior Bolsonaro government official “is not helpful and is unpleasant.” Such interference by Bannon in Brazilian politics occurred after his meeting with the astrologer Carvalho. Both Bannon and the Brazilian astrologer, who is a self-exiled immigrant in the United States, are adherents of the Islamic occultist René Guénon. Bannon, who became persona non grata in the Trump administration and in the conservative mainstream media after Trump expelled him from the White House, seeks to interfere in Brazil’s affairs now that the Bolsonaro administration has given so much space and job opportunities to olavetes.
If General Heleno thought that the left-wing conduct of the NCBB and the Vatican “is interference in the internal affairs of Brazil,” why think that the advance of esoteric fascism within the Bolsonaro administration promoted by two adherents of an Islamic sorcerer would be less interference?
You cannot have a healthy victory, in the fight against the NCBB’s leftism, by choosing esoteric fascism. The only healthy way to defeat the powerful Catholic left is to do what has been done throughout Latin America by a majority of conservative evangelical churches: Preach the Gospel of the Kingdom of God, healing the sick and casting out demons.
With information from Estadão.
Recommended Reading on the Bolsonaro administration:

Sunday, February 03, 2019

A Saudi Candy to America: A Saudi Sculpture and Flag Erected at the World Trade Center, Where 3,000 Americans Were Killed by Saudi Terrorists


A Saudi Candy to America: A Saudi Sculpture and Flag Erected at the World Trade Center, Where 3,000 Americans Were Killed by Saudi Terrorists

By Julio Severo
A sculpture celebrating the Islamic dictatorship of Saudi Arabia had been erected on the World Trade Center grounds on December, near the 9/11 memorial site. The exhibit included a Saudi flag.
Shaped to resemble a piece of candy, the nine-foot-tall statue bore the Saudi emerald flag emblazoned with the Arabic inscription, “There is no god but Allah, and Mohammed is the prophet.”
The Saudi exhibit at the World Trade Center raised questions because of longstanding accusations directed toward Saudi Arabia in the aftermath of the September 11 terror attacks. In 2003, hundreds of families affected by theses attacks sued Saudi Arabia over its alleged involvement in harboring terrorism — given that 15 of the 19 hijackers were Saudi. But the U.S. government squashed their suit.
The Saudi exhibit was set to remain at the World Trade Center until Feb. 28. But after protests, U.S. officials said that the exhibit would move to another location in New York.
Move to another location? This is not enough to change the fact that the Saudi exhibit is an insult to the memory of 3,000 Americans who were victims of Saudi terror.
Usually, a rapist who rapes children firstly offers them a candy and next rapes them. Saudis first “raped” America — if you can call 9/11 a terrorist “rape” — and now they offer America a symbolic candy! Devilishly “nice,” isn’t it?
There is only a problem in this analogy. America is not a vulnerable child at the mercy of a Muslim rapist. America not only is unafraid of wars, but even likes them. So it is no surprise that U.S. right-wing and left-wing presidents have been notoriously warmongers, in a lesser or greater degree. A minor problem with America awakens her always ready war machine to invade.
Why has Saudi Arabia never been invaded?
What hinders U.S. presidents — from Bush to Obama to Trump — from giving Saudi Arabia exactly what it deserves is the fact that the Saudi Islamic dictatorship is the greatest buyer of U.S. heavy arms. If it were not for this fact, Saudi Arabia would have been long ago bombed and invaded — not to mention that the U.S. government — from Bush to Obama to Trump — would stop shielding Saudi Arabia from lawsuits from American relatives of the 3,000 victims of the Saudi attack on the World Trade Center on 9/11.
It seems that the America controlled by neocons can waste 3,000 American lives, provided that in return she — actually, the neocons — gets a massive amount of cash — which the Saudis have been dutifully doing by purchasing untold billions in U.S. heavy weapons. If America gets really concerned about 3,000 American lives lost, she loses the deal. If she prizes the Saudi deal, she gets cash and a symbolic candy.
Certainly, when Saudi Arabia runs out of cash, neocons will keep Saudi Arabia accountable for all its crimes.
Meanwhile, America will welcome Saudi symbolic candies, provided that Saudi Arabia keeps buying tons of U.S. heavy arms.
Yet, my analogy about Saudi rape is not far away from reality. A WND (WorldNetDaily) headline says everything: “5 Saudi students flee U.S. before rape, murder trial.” Such blatant impunity is not happening under Obama, but under Trump, after he sold to the Saudis over 100 billion in arms. High cash blinds — and America suffers exactly this blindness. And what hope is there for such nation when even her powerful televangelists are blinded by the Saudi money?
With information from Fox News and Observer.
Recommended Reading on Saudi Arabia:

Tuesday, January 29, 2019

Astrologer Olavo de Carvalho calls for Brazilian Federal Police to investigate Julio Severo on the allegation that accusations against him involving the Inquisition and occultism are collusions paid by the Russian government that threaten the Brazilian national security


Astrologer Olavo de Carvalho calls for Brazilian Federal Police to investigate Julio Severo on the allegation that accusations against him involving the Inquisition and occultism are collusions paid by the Russian government that threaten the Brazilian national security

Olavo de Carvalho and the art of pretending to be a victim, the art of dissimulating, the art of slandering and the art of making veiled threats

By Julio Severo
In a video published on January 27, 2019, Olavo de Carvalho called for the Brazilian Federal Police to investigate me on the grounds that I am an “attacker with connections to the Russian government,” as if the exposés I make about him were some conspiracy in which I am paid by the Russian government to disrupt his “wonderful” plans to save Brazil.
The video is here: https://youtu.be/Uaxn1W3KZXQ
Carvalho added: “Julio has made several trips to Russia paid by the Russian government. Why do not [the Federal Police] investigate it?”
The implication of his complaint is that I am paid by the Russian government to “attack him,” and this, according to his allegation, deserves the actions of the Federal Police.
Reinforcing an alleged gravity of the situation, he said, “Is not that a foreign intervention on a national matter?”
That is, in his view it is impossible for my exposés against him not to have the collaboration of the Russian government, indicating that exposing his ideas of the Inquisition and occultism are a matter of national security and, to protect his ideas from these exposés, he alleges that such exposés are a “foreign intervention” worthy of a Federal Police investigation.
There is no escaping the fact that such a mode of thinking is similar to the way of thinking of Islamic and communist dictatorships. Whenever a blogger’s view bothers, a totalitarian regime (communist China, Saudi Arabia, North Korea, etc.) claims that the blogger violated national security and is involved in some foreign conspiracy.
The Bolsonaro administration in Brazil has already made an ugly mistake by following some “suggestions” from Carvalho, appointing two ministers suggested by him. These appointments have displeased Brazilian generals, who have publicly criticized Carvalho’s ministers. According to Carvalho, these suggestions were made through his public videos. If the Bolsonaro administration follows the latest video “suggestion” of Carvalho — of a Federal Police investigation against Julio Severo over alleged conspiracy by the Russian government against his ideas, which have become a matter of national security —, Brazil is going to lower itself to the level of communist China, Saudi Arabia, North Korea, etc.
Carvalho’s complaint video came shortly after he complained about the generals in several comments, one of which he said in:
“I alone did more against communist mental hegemony than all the generals combined. That’s why so many of them do not like me. I am a living proof of their omission, ineptitude, and cowardice.”
Sooner or later, he will call for an investigation of the Federal Police against the generals, for the simple fact that they do not recognize his supreme greatness that all his adherents who have undergone brainwashing recognize.
The generals are worried about that. One of them, General Paulo Chagas, wrote yesterday a Facebook post curiously entitled “Olavo ‘Rasputin’ de Carvalho.” As it is well known, the name Rasputin was given to Carvalho by me months ago in the article “Jair Bolsonaro’s Rasputin? How to Weaken a Right-Winger.” It seems the generals are reading my articles. Will Carvalho now say that the generals are being influenced by “Russian propaganda” from a “Russian agent”?
I am not worried about the slander and lies of Carvalho, but about the almost submissive way in which Bolsonaro follows his “suggestions.” Since Carvalho has put his own person as an uncriticizable subject of national security that deserves to be protected by the Federal Police against an “intervention” of the Russian government in collusion with me against him, I will repeat what is already notorious.
I traveled to Russia in 2014 for a big pro-family conference at the Kremlin. I did not attend it alone. I was with evangelical, Catholic and Jew leaders from the United States. Unlike Carvalho, who boasts of having links with American occultists like Steve Bannon and Wolfgang Smith (both adherents of the Islamic occultist René Guénon), I have connections with pro-family leaders in the United States.
I have already attended large pro-life Catholic conferences, including in Aparecida and at the headquarters of the National Conference of Catholic Bishops of Brazil, at the invitation of national Catholic leaders. After this participation, many called me a Catholic or enthusiastic Catholic, especially since I also participated in the founding of great Brazilian pro-life Catholic movements, including the National Pro-Life and Pro-Family Association in 1994 and the National Pro-Life and Pro-Family Network in 2007. My deep connection to the Catholic pro-life movement since the 1980s has made me to be seen as an enthusiastic Catholic.
Many of these trips and participations were paid by Catholic leaders. But I have never been accused of being a “Catholic agent.” Will Carvalho now want to produce a video urging the Federal Police to investigate if I am a Catholic agent paid by the Vatican?
I attended a single Russian pro-life event, along with U.S. pro-life Jewish, Catholic and evangelical leaders, and I’m being accused by a man who never had the support of these U.S. leaders.
While the American left accuses Trump of collusion with Russia, Carvalho makes the same accusation against me.
I made a single trip to Russia. Thus the accusation of Olavo de Carvalho that I have made several trips to Russia is simply slander.
His accusation that such travels were paid by the Russian government is also slander, since the trip I made to Russia was exclusively funded by voluntary donations from Americans and Brazilians. My trip to Russia was encouraged by Dr. Scott Lively, one of America’s greatest evangelical leaders.
To claim that my exposés are motivated by a “Russian conspiracy” paid by the Russian government constitutes slander, because before traveling to Russia I was already denouncing Carvalho because of his advocacy of the revisionism of the Inquisition, which tortured and killed Jews and Protestants. The revisionism that Carvalho advocates diminishes and even denies the suffering, torture, cruelty and deaths of these Jews and evangelicals.
As far as I know, the theme of the Inquisition has nothing to do with Russia. So to deal with Carvalho’s pro-Inquisition obsession, what helped me most was American literature. No country in the world produced more books against the Inquisition than the United States. So, on this important subject, my base is the U.S., not Russia. Is Carvalho going to say that there is an American collusion with me against the Inquisition?
Interestingly, the Inquisition alleged accusations against its Jewish and Protestant victims and put all the state force against them for their view against any dogma of the Catholic Church. In the spirit of the Inquisition, Carvalho is using the same kind of low blow against me.
I have disagreements with Catholicism, but that has never prevented me for more than 30 years from supporting Catholic efforts, including from the popes, to defend the lives of babies against legal abortion.
I have disagreements with Russia, but that does not stop me from supporting the exemplary Russian law that protects children and adolescents against homosexual propaganda. I also support other conservative measures from Russia.
I have disagreements with the U.S. government, especially regarding the neocons and its nasty support of the Islamic dictatorship of Saudi Arabia, but that does not stop me from supporting the U.S. pro-life movement. I also have meetings with American evangelical leaders.
In fact, when I was at the pro-family event in the Kremlin, there was also the greatest member of the Inter-American Institute, which Carvalho claims he founded, but which was actually founded by John Haskins, an astray evangelical. The sole purpose of the existence of such an institute, which has no activities, seems to facilitate visa issues for members of the Carvalho family. Shouldn’t it be investigated by the FBI?
If Carvalho wants to insist on his slander campaign that because I went to the pro-life event in Russia I am a kind of paid agent of the Russian government whose trip was paid by the Russian government, he has an obligation to make the same accusation to the member of the Institute Inter-American. More: He has a legal obligation to prove what he is saying. He will have to raise the same slander against all the U.S. evangelical, Catholic, and Jewish leaders who attended, just like me, the pro-family event in Russia.
Interestingly, Dr. Larry Jacobs of the World Congress of Families told me in Moscow that homosexual and leftist organizations were pressuring the U.S. government, which was then under Obama, to investigate all Americans who dared to attend the Russian event. Obama had imposed sanctions against Russia, so the World Congress of Families could not officially take part in the event, not to be punished by Obama. But many of the World Congress of Family leaders, including Jacobs, attended the event, even under the threat of homosexual and leftist organizations that wanted them to be investigated by the U.S. government for collusion with the Russian government.
In a delayed effect, now Carvalho wants against me the same governmental pressure that homosexual and leftist organizations wanted against the U.S. pro-life Jewish, Catholic and evangelical leaders who dared to take part in the pro-life event in Russia.
In any case, Carvalho has an obligation to launch the same slander against all the Americans who went to the event. He’s going to have to prove that they and I are all paid agents.
In 2015, Carvalho raised the same slander and I challenged him publicly, saying:
my challenge is for a commission of international investigative officials to examine our bank accounts (of me, Hank, Kincaid and Carvalho) to reveal to the world our financial sources. Let us open our financial books. Let such a commission investigate us. Only in this way will everybody know who is really being paid to lie.
After 4 years, Carvalho has not yet accepted the challenge of opening his bank accounts for investigation.
It would be a shame for the Bolsonaro administration to call on the Federal Police to satisfy the slander of a man who has lived as a self-exiled immigrant in the United States for 15 years and does not open his own accounts for investigation. Instead, from a distance, he prefers to sit in his chair smoking a pipe and causing confusion among everyone, from generals to an evangelical blogger.
However, it would be interesting for the Bolsonaro administration to call on the Federal Police to investigate the real reasons for Carvalho’s flight from Brazil. He claims that he received “thousands” of threats and that he had to flee because he had no support. How could he have no support? One of his children worked for the police and he already had friends in the Federal Police, including Eduardo Bolsonaro. Neither of them wanted to help him?
Did he send a copy of these “thousands” of threats to all his friends and relatives in the police?
Carvalho’s case is not, as he claims, a national security case that merits actions by the Federal Police against an evangelical blogger who denounces his connections with the occult and exposes his insanity minimizing and even denying the suffering and death of Jews and Protestants under the Inquisition.
Yet, his case may be national security because of his attitude of slander, falsehood and lies to self-promote himself, causing confusion and conspiracies even against generals.
There are other important issues that also deserve to be investigated.
Has Carvalho properly paid his income taxes in Brazil and the U.S.?
Has he hired for 15 years Brazilians with a registered job at his house giving them visas following American law or, as a cult leader, did he use schemes to get free work by volunteers deceived by his power of persuasion?
Why did he need the Inter-American Institute to get visas for his family?
Cannot the Federal Police investigate this?
Cannot the FBI to investigate this?
In my case, if the Federal Police is driven by the Bolsonaro administration to investigate me, it will find out that for more than 10 years I worked at Carvalho’s Mídia Sem Máscara website, which I thought was conservative, Catholic and pro-life. While I worked for free, without ever having received a single penny of salary, the site received various sponsorships, even from large companies. Have such sponsorships been declared to the IRS? Can the Federal Police make an audit of Mídia Sem Máscara and its sponsorship profits? If the sponsorship money never went to pay columnists’ salaries, where was it going?
Do labor laws allow such an arrangement, where a site profits from sponsorship and columnists get nothing?
Perhaps to ease his conscience, later, once or twice, Carvalho appealed to the public to help me, as if that compensated for the absence of salaries for me for more than ten years.
Inciting the Federal Police against an evangelical blogger, who was used to work for free for a man who took advantage of more than ten years of his work as a columnist in Mídia Sem Máscara, is the attitude of an opportunist. To slander the victim who was used for more than ten years in free labor is treacherous. It is the conduct of a treacherous opportunist, typical of adherents of René Guénon. But like communists, who love to portray themselves as victims while oppressing and threatening, Carvalho portrays himself as a victim and portrays me as the oppressor.
What is the Bolsonaro administration, who seems to love the video “suggestions” of Carvalho, going to do with the “suggestion” of the latest video of the treacherous opportunist against me? Will it charge the Federal Police to investigate the treacherous opportunist or his victim?
Recommended Reading on the U.S. Left against Julio Severo:
Another Recommended Reading: