The folly of man’s planning 

By Julio Severo 

Modern Christian families have usually 2 children. Single women with three or four children fathered by different men are not a rare sight, at least not in Brazil. An unmarried man with several children by several women is a growing modern reality. That is the horrendous legacy of family planning. 

The preaching of family planning, initiated by lesbian theosophist Annie Besant in the predominantly Protestant England in the 19th century, achieved its objective: today’s England is much less Christian, and men and women are much less prone to get married. Of those getting married, the pattern is two children at the most. 

Margaret Sanger, inventor of the term “birth control” in the early 20th century, used to say that birth control would eventually destroy Christianity. Looking at England, nobody could doubt Sanger, founder of the International Planned Parenthood Federation, which is today the largest abortion organization in the world. 

As in England, the family-planning fever, launched by New Age leaders, spread as fire throughout Protestant nations. Next, ideas of racial purification (eugenics) and population control came in the same trail. German Nazis and the Soviet communists benefitted a lot from those ideas. 

If the goal of the population-control agenda was to indoctrinate families to have two children, the success was total, at least in Europe and in the US. But in the trail a shady picture appeared. 

With the divorce of sex from procreation, marriage came under contempt. With marriage despised, sexual freedom came, where a man is free to make sex to whoever he wants, with no marital responsibility. The result, as we have seen, is many and increasing cases of single women having several children fathered by different men. And equally bizarre cases of men that, as perverted hummingbirds pollinating throughout their world, live their lives impregnating a woman after another. 

I met a man that, when young and without God, lived unconcerned about marriage, just getting busy with pleasures, which yielded to him eight children by eight different women. Later, he accepted Jesus and became a minister. 

But there are cases of much younger men that may also brag that they have eight or more children with different women. These children, with several siblings, will never have a normal father’s love, while their fathers continue their insane contests for new women to impregnate.

At the end, a gigantic mass of illegitimate unborn babies, by different fathers and mothers, are aborted or get permission to be born. And the statistics for children born outside marriage and natural family are not beautiful: 70% delinquents come from these irresponsible relationships.

In past times, it took a lifetime for a depraved man to impregnate several women. Today, with sex much easier and free, young men can impregnate a variety of women in a shorter time, and the results are always several abortions or illegitimate children.

Instead of correcting the problem by valuing natural family and establishing punishments for irresponsible conducts, social engineers prefer to redefine family, removing its original sense of “father and mother married with children beget by them” to benefit any deformed grouping, regardless of marriage, composed of:  

* A cohabiting man and woman bringing up children from previous relationships. 

* A divorced man with a divorced woman bringing up children from previous marriages. 

* A man with another man bringing up children fathered by other people. 

Those deformed groups, which are extremely problematic, are included as “family” in sick cultures, and it is no wonder that governments say that “family” has “problems”. Probably, governments want intentionally the classification of those deformed groups as “family” in order to have full powers and excuses to interfere, mutilate, traumatize, damage, deform and destroy the power of the natural family. 

Instead of promoting the growth of the natural family, malicious and opportunistic governments promote the growth of deformed groups and their valorization as “family”. Instead of valuing an increase in births in natural families, irresponsible governments, with their population-control doctrine, eventually promote explosion of abortions and illegitimate births. 

The family-planning doctrine was able to reduce drastically the number of marriages in the Western nations. It was also able to reduce drastically the number of children in the increasingly fewer formal marriages today. But in the process it provoked the disarray of sexual relationships and unrestrained procreation by men and women that want nothing to do with marriage. 

The population-control doctrine, which is reducing marriages and families, is provoking an unprecedented explosion of fatherless and family-less children. As the number of marriages decreases, the number of illegitimate babies increases continuously.  

The abundant access to legal abortion in the Western nations has, for the time being, been able to varnish the enormity of their demographic woes, because a lot of women that were supposed to be with 8 or more children by different men are single and childless, continuing “normally” their careers and active sexual lives. The cost of the sexual freedom is an immense blood shedding that is impossible to measure. 

To men that don’t want to impregnate woman after woman, the only option left is anal (homosexual) sex and become other piece in the population-control game to destroy natural marriage, contributing for many of the gay demands for the disfigurement of the natural family. 

Sex, any sex, is promoted today, provided that it mutilates, traumatizes, damages, deforms or even destroys children, values, Christianity, marriage and family. It is not without purpose that the International Planned Parenthood Federation is engaged in the promotion of abortion, homosexuality, feminism and sexual education in the schools. 

The consequences are already here. And in the next decades, more consequences will come. Because of the reduced number of children, Europe is in process of being dominated by large Muslim families. But the European leaders’ most urgent questions in the next years are: with a population of young workers more and more reduced, how to support social security? What to do with the enormous number of seniors increasing continuously? Netherlands, formerly a strong Protestant nation, has given the official answer: euthanasia.

Netherlands, religiously faithful to the population-control doctrine, has been pioneering in homosexual “marriage”, children’s adoption by gay couples, legal acceptance of marijuana and other drugs, etc. Besides euthanasia, Netherlands has been exporting abortion to other nations, through her infamous abortion boat. And for the sake of diversity and demoncracy, Netherlands has the dishonor of having the first pedophilic party in the world, composed mostly of homosexual pedophiles.

Netherlands and other modern nations reflect the fulfillment of Margaret Sanger’s wish: birth control destroys Christian churches and their influence on society

That is the cost of the acceptance of the man’s planning. That is the cost of the rejection of the planning of God. 

To marry and have several children inside of marriage is folly, fools in this world say. But this is the “foolishness” of God. Not to marry and fill the earth with children’s blood or fill it with traumatized children without a father, without a family and without a moral direction: that is the man’s foolishness without God. That is the legacy of family planning.

Portuguese version of this article: A loucura do planejamento do homem

Source: www.lastdayswatchman.blogspot.com

Rivers of Blood: A Brazilian pro-life Evangelical writes about the contraceptive culture and prophecies in Revelation (short version published in LifeSiteNews)

Blood in the rivers: the contraceptive culture and prophecies in Revelation (original version)

Leader of Brazil's Homosexual Movement Admits Existence of Ex-Gays

Says, "we need you heterosexuals, we love you so that you may reproduce children to become homosexuals"

By Matthew Cullinan Hoffman, Latin America Correspondent

BRAZIL, May 12, 2010 (LifeSiteNews.com) - Luiz Mott, the undisputed leader of Brazil's homosexual movement, has admitted on national television that no one is born homosexual, and that people can change their sexual orientations.

In a recent appearance on the highly popular late night talk show "Programa do Jô" aired on Brazil's Globo network, Mott told the host that he is a "former heterosexual."

"I am an ex-heterosexual in the same way that there are ex-gays, people that were not 100% homosexual," said Mott.  "They had some experiences, did not like them and then joined the other side."

Although Mott attributed change to people who were "not 100% homosexual," he made it clear to host Jô Soares that he believes that "all human beings have, as Freud said it, a bisexual desire," and that sexual preference is something fluid and changeable.

"Fortunately human sexuality is cultural and constructed and can change. I think I am not going to change anymore because I am very much accustomed and happy," he told Soares.

"Usually I say, we need you heterosexuals, we love you so that you may reproduce children to become homosexuals...new gays and new lesbians," added Mott during the interview, which was broadcast on April 24.

As LifeSiteNews has noted in past articles Mott is also known for his open sexual attraction to adolescents, and regards restrictions on sex with minors to be based on "prejudice."

Related links:

Full Interview with Mott on Programa do Jô (Portuguese)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v8LvDghc30k&feature=related

Excerpts of interview translated into English by Julio Severo
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x7G3GYfYV3Y

Source: http://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/2010/may/10051212.html

Anthony Comstock: the first pro-life activist in the modern history 

Pioneer in the fight against abortion and in efforts to press the Congress and politicians to protect families and their children and adolescents 

By Julio Severo 

To expose children and adolescents to pornographic materials and movies under the cloak of “sexual education”, showing explicit scenes and positions of sex, including homosexual. To expose children and adolescents to methods called of “family planning”, including abortion, to hinder pregnancy as if it were a sexually transmissible disease. That, unhappily, is the pattern of criminal violence prevailing at the schools and in the society when perverts are not kept from changing the laws and the culture. 

The vast majority of the efforts to expose children and adolescents to the pornographic sexual education and information and “services” of abortion and contraception is a result from the campaigns by the International Planned Parenthood Federation, founded in the 1950s by Margaret Sanger. It was a cultural and pornographic imperialism that defeated legal barriers firstly in the US and later expanded itself as a virus to the rest of the world. 

Today the International Planned Parenthood Federation is the largest world promoter of contraception, abortion and pornographic sexual education in the schools. 

According to the ideology of Sanger, birth control

Eventually would destroy Christianity. 

Eventually would exterminate the black race. 

Eventually would purify the white race. 

Eventually would promote abortion as the women’s human right. 

The sexual violence officially clothed as education of children and adolescents today is something criminal, and it is this way that Anthony Comstock treated it. Since late 1860s, his action was aimed at fighting propagandas of pornography, abortion and birth control. Born in 1844 in Connecticut in a town called New Canaan, since childhood he loved to read the Bible and he was an evangelical Christian that didn’t practice Christianity just inside of the church walls. Eventually he became an active worker in the Young Men’s Christian Association (YMCA) in New York. YMCA was a much known evangelical organization, where even D.L. Moody was an active member.

In that time, YMCA founded the Society for the Suppression of Vice to advance the work of Comstock, where he worked as secretary until his death. 

He fought the social vices by lobbying legislators. He traveled to Washington DC and convinced congressmen about the need of laws to protect families and their children and adolescents from pornography. Such pioneering efforts were the first demonstrations of pro-family lobby, or campaigns to press and influence legislators to prioritize the well-being of the families. 

His pressures on the Congress successfully led to the 1873 establishment of a strong federal law banning the transportation of obscene, lewd, or lascivious items in the mail. The law, with penalties up to ten years in prison, was eventually known as Comstock Law. 

To implement the law, Comstock was officially appointed for the United States Post Office, with powers to enforce the banning of pornography. From 1873 to 1915, he conducted spectacular police raids on pornographic publishers and vendors.

In one year alone, 14,200 lb of pornographic photographic plates, 134,000 lb of pornographic books, 200,000 photographs and images, 31,500 boxes of pills and potions, and 60,300 obscene articles were destroyed. It is estimated that fifteen tons of pornographic books and publications, and four million photographs, were destroyed. This result was not incidental: Comstock took his career and responsibilities very seriously.

The Comstock Law is still in effect in federal laws to prohibit obscenity. It is vigorously enforced regarding child pornography on the Internet and in print. So the modern repression to the children’s pornographic exploration is established on the pioneering efforts of an active evangelical Christian. But after the death of Comstock in 1915, his law began to succumb to the systematic attacks by Sanger, because there was not anyone that was able or wanted to fill the role of Comstock.

Even so, Rev. Billy Sunday (1862-1935), probably the greatest preacher to large crowds before Billy Graham, condemned alcoholism, pornography, birth control and other social evils. Of Presbyterian orientation, he denounced Sanger and her ideology until his last days. Among Catholics, the denunciations came from Fr. John Ryan, in the 1930s. Not much different from Sunday, Comstock saw alcoholic beverage as harmful. By coincidence, Sanger died as an alcoholic in 1966.

Anthony Comstock accomplished great legal feats of protection of families and he faced, in his own generation, many abortion and pornography activists. Yet, during his lifetime, who prevailed was him.

In early 1915, President Woodrow Wilson named Comstock to lead the American Delegation to the International Purity Conference, held that year in San Francisco. As historian Paul Boyer concedes, of the 4,000 delegates present “there were probably not two persons who did not unreservedly share his point of view.” After this crowning event, Comstock left this world.

Comstock was successful. Between 1873 and 1877, he “probably prosecuted more abortionists... than any other person in the United States.” After his five years of aggressive action, “abortion-related advertising declined precipitously throughout the nation.” Indeed, historian James Mohr concludes that because of Comstock’s work, “[a]bortion’s period of commercial visibility, which had lasted since the 1840’s, was over.”

Another historian of the abortion issue, Leslie Reagan, concludes that abortion was off the agenda of organized religion until the late 1950’s simply because, “for nearly a century, abortion was a crime and no social movement suggested otherwise.” This was one of the large achievements of Comstock.

How is it that for almost 100 years the Comstock Law made morality to prevail above immorality? How is it that one man was able for a long period of forty years to scare and defeat a crowd of wealthy pornographic, spiritualistic, aborting and immoral Goliaths? The life of Comstock demonstrates that he who is in the Lord makes exploits.

While Comstock fought against pornography, abortion and contraception, Protestant churches were blooming with genuine revivals. During the unbeatable Comstock era, D.L. Moody was used by God in great revivals, Billy Sunday began his ministry that reached America from one end to the other and the Pentecostal movement was born in America to change the history of the world evangelism.

The Comstock era, which was marked by the greatest Pentecostal revivals ever seen in modern time, was an era where America was an indisputably and predominantly Protestant nation.

According to the 1911 Encyclopedia Britannica, the US religious scenery was in 1890: 68% were Protestants and 30% were Catholic. But since contraception and abortion became totally legalized in the US — contraception in the late 1960s and abortion in 1973 —, the scenery has changed. From 1972 to 1993, Protestants constituted about 63% of the US population. By 2002, they were 52% and for the first time since the founding of the US, now Protestants are a minority. The dream of Sanger came true: birth control is destroying Christianity in America.

Today, with the domination of pornography, abortion and contraception in the American society, America lost her formerly Protestant predominance.

America and the world need revival. And genuine revival goes together with social justice, as the many social conquests of Comstock attest.

This article is only a summary of the e-book “Anthony Comstock: the first pro-family champion in the modern history”, written by Julio Severo. To read the full e-book, follow this link: http://www.scribd.com/doc/31144484/Anthony-Comstock-the-First-Profamily-Champion-in-the-Modern-History

Portuguese version of this article: Anthony Comstock: o primeiro ativista pró-vida da história moderna

Source: www.lastdayswatchman.blogspot.com

The truth comes out of the closet

Luiz Mott, the leader of the homosexual movement in Brazil, betrays, in his own words, his ideas and thoughts

See here the video produced by Julio Severo: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x7G3GYfYV3Y

Source: www.lastdayswatchman.blogspot.com

Luiz Mott saves Catholic Church from suffering mega pedophilia scandal

Luiz Mott saves Catholic Church from suffering mega pedophilia scandal 

By Julio Severo 

A seminarian left a Catholic seminar because he thought it was not the ideal place for him. He ended up finding in Marxism most of the answers for his sexual “needs.” 

Today, the former seminarian is not only an open homosexual, but also the most prominent homosexual leader in Brazil. He is also accused of defending pedophilia. See here: http://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/2007/jul/07073011.html

It is not easy for you to hide for a long time homosexuality and pedophilia in an environment where there are Christian moral restrictions. 

But inside of Marxism and the movement homosexual, you can leave the closet, and receive due protection, because illusions and lies are a part of the homosexual and Marxist game. 

So there are no daily pedophilia scandals coming directly from the homosexual movement or from the Marxist movements. It is as if there were no sexual threat to boys in their midst. It is as if these movements were a paradise of sexual purity, the ideal place for babies and boys. 

However, that is in no way the reality. In 2007, I exposed to Brazil in my blog Dr. Denilson Lopes, a Brazilian university professor that published the article “Loving Boys: Pedophilia and the Contemporary Intolerance” in a homosexual website. To see his full article in Portuguese saved in my blog, follow this link: http://juliosevero.blogspot.com/2007/07/pedofilia-and-homossexualismo.html

After 3 years, no authority has taken any action. But I wonder that if I had referred to the pedophilia advocate as “Father Denilson Lopes”, in less than 3 days the national and international media, prosecutors, federal police agents and a group of other creatures would appear in a hurry to denounce “another scandal of pedophilia in the Catholic Church”, omitting the obvious fact that, above all, Lopes is homosexual. By the way, Lopes is very well sheltered and protected in the Marxist academic environment. 

With university professors like Lopes and Mott, who now will write the “Pedophilic Collective” to open the secrets of that Marxist and homosexual closet? 

Mott’s option for Marxism and the homosexual movement was an issue of mere survival then. 

However, on one side it would have been good if he had become priest or bishop. Only this way his scandals would forcedly be unlocked from the closet to the public by a media always ready to cover up pedophilia inside of Marxism and in the movement homosexual, but that it never loses an opportunity to denounce priests who abuse boys. But, of course, without never mentioning their homosexuality, because it compromises fatally the homosexual movement. 

For the leftist media, in that dirty game the only immorally valid attitude is to compromise the Catholic Church and her stances against abortion and homosexuality. 

Certainty if Vatican embraced totally Marxism, promoting abortion and officially ordaining  homosexual priests, bishops and cardinals, the pedophilia scandals involving the Catholic Church would disappear mysteriously on the news media. After all, friends protect friends. 

If the Catholic Church made that official change, the Marxist media would be forced to seek another scapegoat: conservative evangelical churches. The show then would begin: daily scandals of pedophilia of ministers and other leaders bursting wildly before the public. 

The homosexual movement and the Marxist elite, which control the mainstream press, know very well what they do when they “report” cases of homosexual abuse of boys inside of the Catholic Church, using her as a scapegoat of the consequences of the conduct that they so much stimulate at schools and in society. 

But a homosexual is a homosexual, whether in the Catholic Church, in evangelical churches, in Marxism or in the movement homosexual. 

The vast majority of the pedophilia scandals in the Catholic Church involves boys’ sexual abuses, that is, homosexual priests abusing underage males. 

But why to think that only inside of the Catholic Church homosexuals commit sexual abuses against boys? Why to think that in Marxism and in the homosexual movement they automatically become sexual saints and protectors of children? 

Around world, nobody today is seeking more the children’s sexual liberation than homosexual groups. And, believe it or not, because of their fight for children’s sexual “liberation” they are considered children's advocates. In that sense, it seems that Luiz Mott just wants to be a pioneer in Brazil of that noble “liberation.” 

Even with those clear signs, see the special treatment that the Marxist media would grant Mott, depending on his choice: 

1. As a priest or bishop, Mott would be exposed as a demon of pedophilia inside of the Catholic Church. The media would use him to lead the public to understand that men’s sex with boys has everything to do with the Catholic Church and her moral values, but absolutely anything to do with homosexuality. He would be presented as a pedophilic scandal produced by the Catholic Church. They would say, “What a hideous and criminal thing: Father Mott involved in pedophilia!” 

2. As a Marxist and leader of the Brazilian gay movement, he is portrayed as an angel, having been awarded by former Brazilian president Fernando Henrique Cardoso and by the current Brazilian president Lula for having founded the Gay Group of Bahia, which wearisomely chatters that Brazil is having a “homocaust”. Even with his pro-pedophilia declarations, nobody in the mainstream press in Brazil calls him a “pedophilia scandal produced by the homosexual movement”. In fact, they would say, “What a beautiful thing: Dr. Luiz Mott, a professor in the Federal University of Bahia, advocating the children’s sexual rights!” 

While Mott stays in Marxism and in the homosexual movement, he will be protected and enjoying all the kinds of privileges from the press and the government. But woe to him if he wants to be a priest or bishop. The media won’t forgive him. 

Moral lesson? If one wants to hide his sexual perversions, he should not do it in the Catholic Church and any other Christian church. Marxism and the homosexual movements are the ideal closet to hide dirty secrets. 

How can the Catholic Church in Brazil face that media dishonesty suported by the homosexual movement and Marxism? 

By radically closing herself to the “liberation” theology and by radically opening her up to the Holy Spirit and his gifts. When Mott studied in a Catholic seminar, it was an excellent opportunity for him to receive deliverance. 

According to Mark 16, Jesus Christ’s follower has the power and the authority to minister healing and deliverance for the oppressed, and undeniably Mott entered the seminar oppressed by homosexuality. But Catholic seminaries were infected by liberation theology and by a sickening liberalism. Homosexuality is not an uncommon addiction among liberals, whether Catholics or not.

To avoid boys’ sexual abuse, the Catholic Church and all of the Christian churches should make a rigorous selection to hinder closed homosexuals from being ordained. And they should get ready, under the power and anointing of the Holy Spirit, to work with all those that enter in their seminars with homosexual problems. In fact, that apostolic approach should be rule for all those that enter in Christian churches. 

The answer to prevail over the biased media, the homosexual movement and the Marxist movements is the Holy Spirit. No power on the earth, under the earth or in the spiritual spheres is mightier than the Holy Spirit. 

The Holy Spirit is also the answer for homosexuals who, as Luiz Mott, enter in the seminar in search of spiritual solutions, but they find only liberalism and more homosexuality. The Holy Spirit delivers from the worst homosexual addictions, including sex with boys. 

Actually, by leaving the seminary, Mott saved the Catholic Church from a mega scandal. But if somebody there had helped him to know and experience the Holy Spirit, instead of saying today that Christianity is oppressive, Mott would be testifying that he was delivered from a big oppression. 

Now, who will save him who saved the Catholic Church?

Portuguese version of this article: Luiz Mott livra Igreja Católica de sofrer mega-escândalo de pedofilia

Source: http://lastdayswatchman.blogspot.com

Leader of Brazil Homosexual Movement Under Investigation for Pedophilia

A Satanic Joke

Brazilian Homosexual Leader Posts Home Addresses of Pro-Family Activists

Brazilian President Will Seek to “Criminalize Words and Acts” against Homosexuality

The lie that got asylum

Brazilian homosexual is granted asylum in the US by putting Brazil in the stranger category of one of the world champions in violence and murders against homosexuals

By Julio Severo

Since 2003, the Lula administration has been promoting and imposing the gay agenda, not only in Brazil, but also in the world. Under Lula, Brazil was the first country to introduce, in 2003, a resolution in the UN classifying homosexuality as an inalienable human right. The same kind of resolution was introduced by the Brazilian government in the Organization of the American States.

Under the Lula administration, there is an increasing political and legal apparatus to scare and gag Brazilian citizens that disagree with the homosexual behavior. Federal campaign “Brazil without Homophobia” requires the government’s pro-homosexuality interference in every sphere of the Brazilian society.

Even so, Brazilian homosexual Augusto Pereira de Souza, 27, was granted asylum by the Barack Obama administration. His allegation? Persecution. He alleged that he cannot return to Brazil because Brazil is one of the most violent countries against homosexuals. In fact, the argument for his asylum request, as “Queerty” blog says, puts Brazil as one of the biggest murderers of homosexuals in the world, “with 180 reported LGBT murders in 2008 alone.”

The biggest propagandist of the numbers of homosexuals murdered in Brazil is Gay Group of Bahia (GGB), whose founder is Luiz Mott, who has been accused of advocating pedophilia. GGB, which was the first major militantly homosexual organization in Brazil, says that between 1980 and 2005 2,511 homosexuals were murdered throughout Brazil. GGB has no doubt: Brazil is the most homophobic nation in the world.

Souza’s defense was made by Suzanne Goldberg, professor at Columbia Law School’s Sexuality and Gender Law Clinic, together with their students. Goldberg used data from GGB to defend asylum for Souza.

According to the Columbia University website, “The grant, issued by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, comes at a time when conditions for gay, lesbian, bisexual, and transgender (GLBT) individuals in Brazil are becoming more dangerous”. Yes, you have read it correctly: Columbia University is saying indeed that under the Lula administration’s strong pro-homosexuality policies, conditions for homosexuals in Brazil are becoming “more dangerous“. With that paranoia coming directly from the Columbia University, we wonder if conditions for homosexuals are becoming “safer” in Iran and Saudi Arabia.

If Brazil became “more dangerous”, so why did not Souza request asylum in Iran or Saudi Arabia?

Between 1980 and 2005, were only homosexuals murdered in Brazil? Official data shows that in that exact period of time over 800,000 men, women and children were murdered in Brazil. Today over 50,000 men, women and children are murdered in Brazil each year.

“Wait one minute”, a homosexual activist could say. “The government says that we are more than 10% of the population. Therefore, the number of murdered homosexuals should be 80,000!”

If the Gay Group of Bahia were the Hetero Group of Bahia, then the reaction would be totally different, “2,511 is a totally homophobic, prejudiced and discriminatory number, because it doesn’t achieve even 1% from 800,000. We demand at least 10% of the share of that high number. We want equality! If the Brazilian population is suffering a high rate of murders, we demand the same right!”

What about the 50,000 Brazilians murdered each year?

“We want 10% of this too. It is our right! We do not accept this homophobic, insignificant and mediocre number of just 180 homosexuals murdered each year!”

I don’t also understand why the number of murdered homosexuals is not larger, because of the dangers they choose to be exposed to. Oswaldo Braga, president of the Gay Movement of Minas, declared that transvestites are most of the murdered homosexuals in Brazil. He said, “They are homosexuals that are more involved in criminality, as prostitution and drug trafficking, being more exposed to violence”. (Tribuna de Minas, 09/03/2007, page 3.)

The number of 800,000 murdered Brazilians shows that Brazil lacks security. And there is a huge need of police patrols. Because of the government favoritism toward the homosexual agenda, will the few patrols available for the population have to be transferred to protect prostitution and drug trafficking zones frequented by homosexuals?

I was born in São Paulo, the same city Souza says that he suffered “persecution”. I remember that 25 years ago a friend and I, who we were very young, were going to the church service. We passed close to the Republic Square — an old homosexual point right in the downtown São Paulo —, and a group of about 6 homosexuals ran after us shouting lascivious words. It was a scary experience for two young men. This kind of bizarre homosexual behavior was common in the Republic Square and, of course, had the potential of attracting violent reactions from those that were not willing to run.

I should fear more than Souza does. Increasingly, shopping centers and other places in Brazil are being shamelessly used as prostitution points — right in the men’s bathrooms. And, maybe for fear, men look and ignore. I have already witnessed homosexuals that, inside of the shopping center bathroom, remain stationed as anal-sex cannibals, looking at each man entering, waiting an attack opportunity. What would happen if I were recognized as Julio Severo in a shopping center bathroom?

Based on data from the Gay Group of Bahia, Columbia University says, “In Brazil, police routinely fail to investigate violence committed against GLBT individuals.”

The Brazilian police have immense difficulty of investigating all the 50,000 murders a year, where heteros are victims. If the US wants to grant asylum to all of the victims of violent crimes in Brazil, the asylum requests will increase by at least 500,000 a year. Why to think that only Brazilian homosexuals are victims of violence and murders in a socialist system where strongly armed criminals are free to attack strongly unarmed victims? The whole Brazilian population is a victim of this cruel system.

While I am writing this article, Brazil has been shaken by the disappearance and murders of six teenagers (Diego, 13; Paulo Victor, 16; George, 17; Divino, 16; Flávio, 14; and Márcio Luiz, 19). The case received national repercussion this week with the arrest of the murderer, Admar de Jesus, a homosexual. He had served a four-year prison sentence for pedophilia in Brasília, but as soon as he was freed, he began to rape and murder boys. There are thousands of Brazilian boys victims of homosexual rapists each year. Will Columbia University fight for them to be granted asylum in the US too?

However, the grant of asylum to Souza may be part of a major political scheme between Brazilian gay activists and their American counterparts — and the presence of the Gay Group of Bahia is evidence of the involved activism. A strong anti-homophobia law has already been passed in the US and Souza’s asylum may give the Obama administration the perfect excuse to press Brazil to approve a law to “protect” homosexuals that up to now Lula and his administration were not able to pass, because of the Christian resistance.

That “protection” will, of course, protect, promote and impose even more the gay agenda in Brazil.

Most of the 800,000 murdered Brazilians were not in prostitution and drug trafficking zones. They also were not entitled to asylum in the US.

But many Brazilian homosexuals prefer to die than leaving their Republic Squares. With the asylum route opened by Souza, they may now have a second option: the “safe” prostitution and drug trafficking zones in the US.

So in a sense Brazil should be very grateful to Columbia University: If all Brazilian homosexuals follow the Souza route, Brazilian boys will nevermore suffer disappearances, rapes and murders by gay rapists, and Brazil will be free from gay activists, their lies and tyranny.

Portuguese version of this article: A mentira que ganhou asilo

Source: www.lastdayswatchman.blogspot.com

Will the United States become a magnet to attract homosexuals of other countries?  

Asylum for homosexual perverts U.S. policy

Gays, persecution and lies: the eternal soap opera

The day sex between men and boys is no longer offensive

Leader of Brazil Homosexual Movement Under Investigation for Pedophilia

Will the United States become a magnet for foreign homosexuals?

By Peter LaBarbera

Homosexual websites are celebrating that the U.S. Department of Homeland Security has granted asylum to 27-year-old Brazilian homosexual Augusto Pereira de Souza, who claims he would face torment and violent attacks if forced to return to his country.

I wonder what would happen if Julio Severo (right), the outspoken Brazilian Christian advocate who fled his country due to escalating oppression against critics of homosexuality, were to apply for applied for U.S. asylum. An article in the “Queerty” blog claims that Brazil is “one of the world’s most violently anti-gay countries … with 180 reported LGBT murders in 2008 alone.” I do not know the accuracy of this information. But here is the problem: already Queerty and other pro-homosexuality activists are citing the case of Souza (whose asylum claim was secured by three students at Columbia Law School’s Sexuality and Gender Law Clinic,” Queerty reports) as good news for Ugandan homosexuals who might want to make similar claims.

Is the United States of America under President Obama going to become the magnet for foreign homosexuals and “queer” activists the world over? AFTAH has condemned draconian punishments against homosexuals (such as “solutions” prescribed by radical Islamists). However, America and the West have no right to impose their decadent, perversion-celebrating values on the rest of the world, and other countries certainly have the right to criminalize homosexual behavior just as it was criminalized in the United States prior to the Supreme Court’s activist Lawrence v. Texas decision. (Anti-sodomy laws remain on the books in many states and laws that do not solely ban homosexual sodomy have NOT been struck down; here is a Wikipedia article which — despite that website’s strong pro-homosexual bias — describes the sodomy law situation in all 50 states.)

Here in America, we realize that sodomy may never be criminalized in San Francisco, where men are allowed to walk the streets fully naked. But if more conservative locales or states choose to do so according to their local community standards, that SHOULD be their prerogative (ditto for legislative attempts to ban abortion or “partial-birth” infanticide). And if liberals are concerned about the death penalty being imposed against homosexuals, and rightly so, they should also be concerned about public policy that promotes homosexual behavior with all its attendant, even life-threatening, consequences.

A good place for America to start “re-criminalizing” would be to ban all bathhouses and sex clubs were sex is allowed to go on in a commercial establishment. “Gay” and straight. See this AFTAH article about ex-”gay” Christian advocate James Hartline’s successful campaign in San Diego to close down a local homosexual bathhouse.

For more on Brazil: go HERE to read a LifeSite article about the socialist Brazilian President’s “hate speech” plans. And go HERE to read Julio Severo’s blog. To subscribe to LifeSiteNews’ daily news feed, go HERE, and to subscribe to OneNewsNow’s daily news brief, go HERE. — Peter LaBarbera, www.americansfortruth.org

Source: Americans for Truth

Asylum for homosexual perverts U.S. policy

Charlie Butts — OneNewsNow

A homosexual from Brazil has been granted asylum in the United States because he fears mistreatment in his home country over his sexual orientation.

According to LifeSiteNews.com, 28-year-old Augusto Pereira de Souza — as a result of the ruling — will be allowed to work and receive Social Security benefits in the U.S., and eventually will be permitted to apply for permanent residency. De Souza had submitted testimony that he had been verbally harassed by a policeman and, on a separate occasion, been chased by “skinheads” who were armed with baseball bats.

Peter LaBarbera of Americans for Truth About Homosexuality finds the case astounding because Brazil, he notes, is one of the most pro-homosexual countries on the map. He says Christians are the target of animosity in Brazil if they speak out against homosexuality.

“I happen to have a friend, Julio Severo, who left Brazil in fear for being prosecuted as a Christian under the anti-homophobia mechanisms that are being set up in that country,” he explains.

The Americans for Truth spokesman admits he finds it hard to believe that de Souza had anything to fear in Brazil over his choice in favor of homosexuality.

“It’s not becoming a friendly place for people who believe homosexuality is wrong,” he says, “and so this is just preposterous that the United States is accepting a Brazilian homosexual on that basis.”

LaBarbera adds that since Brazil is becoming “a homosexual dream country,” it is a perversion of U.S. asylum policies to grant Brazilian homosexuals the privilege of coming to America over fears of persecution for their lifestyle.

Source: OneNewsNow     

Divulgation: www.lastdayswatchman.blogspot.com

Homosexual Brazilian Gets Asylum in US After Claiming 'Persecution'

By Matthew Cullinan Hoffman, Latin America Correspondent

SAO PAULO, April 1, 2010 (LifeSiteNews.com) - A homosexual man from the city of São Paulo has been granted asylum in the U.S. after claiming he suffered "persecution" in Brazil for his homosexuality.

As a consequence of the ruling, Augusto Pereira de Souza, 28, will enjoy the right to work and receive social security benefits in the United States, and will soon be able to apply for permanent residency, according to the Terra news service.

The verdict was rendered despite the fact that Brazil has one of the most homosexualist governments in the world.

The Brazilian government funds the world's largest "gay parade" (http://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/2008/may/08052806.html) in Pereira's home town of São Paulo every year, and operates a massive national campaign called "Brazil Without Homophobia." 

The government has also announced that it will censor all programming (http://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/2009/may/09051502.html), including religious programming, in which negative opinions of homosexuality are expressed.

Homosexuals are also allowed to adopt children (http://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/2006/nov/06112402.html).

Pereira de Souza was awarded asylum after submitting testimony that he had suffered verbal harassment from a policeman on one occasion, and was chased by "skinheads" in a park armed with baseball bats on another occasion, although he admits that he was not actually hit by any of them.

Source: http://www.lifesite.net/ldn/viewonsite.html?articleid=10040116

Divulgation: www.lastdayswatchman.blogspot.com

Brazilian Couple Receive Criminal Conviction for Homeschooling

Verdict given despite sons passing law school entrance exams -- at ages 13 and 14

By Matthew Cullinan Hoffman, Latin America Correspondent

MINAS GERAIS, BRAZIL, March 26, 2010 (LifeSiteNews.com) - Despite the fact that his children passed difficult government imposed tests, and even qualified for law school at the ages of 13 and 14, homeschooler Cleber Nunes and his wife Bernadeth have been slapped with fines equivalent to a total of $3,200 for refusing to submit their children to the Brazilian school system.

However, Nunes told LifeSiteNews.com (LSN) that he has no intention to pay the fine, although he says that he might have to spend 15-30 days in jail if he does not.

Although homeschooling is common in many countries, including the United States, and is associated with higher levels of academic achievement, it is completely prohibited in Brazil, the government of which has become increasingly intrusive in recent decades following the establishment of a socialist regime in the 1990s.

Since Nunes began to homeschool his two oldest children four years ago, his family has been subject to repeated threats of fines, imprisonment, and loss of custody.  However, he has resisted steadfastly and his case has gained national attention.

The guilty verdict in the criminal case against Nunes, which follows two negative verdicts in a parallel civil case that ended over a year ago, was given despite the fact that David and Jonatas Nunes had passed a difficult set of tests imposed by the criminal court.

"They had asked the kids to do the tests to check their level of knowledge, and also psychological tests to check their mental health," Nunes told LifeSiteNews (LSN).  "It seems that the only valid result they expected was the failure of the kids."

The tests imposed by the court on Nunes' children were so difficult that one of the teachers who had designed it reportedly admitted that she herself could not pass it.  However, David and Jonatas Nunes both passed the exams by margins of five and eight percentage points.

Despite his sons' performance, however, the government has again ruled against Nunes, this time in criminal court, and ordered a fine.  The total amount in fines owed by Nunes as a result of the decisions against him has mounted to over $3,200 in US dollars.

"If they impose tests it means that two possibilities should be considered.  They could be suffering intellectual abandonment, or not," Nunes told LSN.  "In other words, they were trying to prove they were victims. But they passed and they kept saying we were criminal."

Nunes says that despite his success, the judge ruled against him because of his style of home schooling, in which the children direct their own learning, with Nunes overseeing the process.

"The judge said we left the children to learn by themselves," said Nunes.  "He recognized that they passed the university entrance examination and the tests, but said that it was by their own efforts," he added, calling that a "joke."

"They want to take control of them, of their minds"

Nunes says he has decided not to appeal the ruling, because Brazil's Supreme Court has already refused to hear the appeal of his civil case.  Although he has paid his wife's fine to spare her jail time, he says he will not pay his own fine.

"The natural thing to do is appeal, but I don't trust the Brazilian judges," Nunes told LSN. "They already showed who they are and what they want. They are not interested in protecting our kids....They want to take control of them, of their minds, they want them out of their home."

Although he has refused to comply with the rulings against him, Nunes currently faces no more legal difficulties stemming from the homeschooling of David and Jonatas, because they are now beyond the age of mandatory schooling.

However, his daughter could soon be subject to compulsory schooling in Brazil.  She will soon turn four, the age at which compulsory schooling begins in Brazil.

Contact Information:

Cleber Nunes (he speaks English) can be contacted at: cleber@andradenunes.org

To contact the Brazilian Embassy:

Embassy of Brazil in the USA

3006 Massachusetts Avenue, NW

Washington, DC

20008-3634

Phone: (202) 238-2700

Fax: (202) 238-2827

Email: ambassador@brasilemb.org

Embassy of Brazil in Canada

450 Wilbrod Street

Ottawa, Ontario, K1N 6M8

Phone: (613) 237-1090 or (613) 755-5160

Fax: (613) 237-6144

E-mail: mailbox@brasembottawa.org

Embassies of Brazil to other Nations: http://www.embassyworld.com/embassy/Brazil/Brazil1.html

Previous LifeSiteNews coverage:

Homeschooling Showdown in Brazil: Children to be Tested by Court in Battle Over Educational Rights of Parents

http://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/2008/aug/08081802.html

Shock: Brazilian Homeschooling Parents Face Arrest Even after Early-Teen Sons Pass Law School Exams

Family appeals case to Brazilian Supreme Court

http://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/2009/apr/09040112.html

Brazilian Court Convicts Homeschooling Family Despite Evidence of Success

http://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/2008/dec/08122308.html

Brazilian Homeschoolers Score Surprise Victory in Showdown Against Government

http://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/2008/sep/08090207.html

Brazilian Homeschool Couple May be Jailed if Their Children Fail Harsh Government Tests

http://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/2008/aug/08082207.html

Homeschooling Showdown in Brazil: Children to be Tested by Court in Battle Over Educational Rights of Parents

http://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/2008/aug/08081802.html

Brazilian Government Prosecutes Homeschooling Family, Threatens to Remove Children

http://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/2008/mar/08030610.html

Source: http://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/2010/mar/10032601.html

Divulgation: http://lastdayswatchman.blogspot.com/