Tuesday, April 27, 2010

Luiz Mott saves Catholic Church from suffering mega pedophilia scandal


Luiz Mott saves Catholic Church from suffering mega pedophilia scandal 

By Julio Severo 
A seminarian left a Catholic seminar because he thought it was not the ideal place for him. He ended up finding in Marxism most of the answers for his sexual “needs.” 
Today, the former seminarian is not only an open homosexual, but also the most prominent homosexual leader in Brazil. He is also accused of defending pedophilia. See here: http://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/2007/jul/07073011.html
It is not easy for you to hide for a long time homosexuality and pedophilia in an environment where there are Christian moral restrictions. 
But inside of Marxism and the movement homosexual, you can leave the closet, and receive due protection, because illusions and lies are a part of the homosexual and Marxist game. 
So there are no daily pedophilia scandals coming directly from the homosexual movement or from the Marxist movements. It is as if there were no sexual threat to boys in their midst. It is as if these movements were a paradise of sexual purity, the ideal place for babies and boys. 
However, that is in no way the reality. In 2007, I exposed to Brazil in my blog Dr. Denilson Lopes, a Brazilian university professor that published the article “Loving Boys: Pedophilia and the Contemporary Intolerance” in a homosexual website. To see his full article in Portuguese saved in my blog, follow this link: http://juliosevero.blogspot.com/2007/07/pedofilia-and-homossexualismo.html
After 3 years, no authority has taken any action. But I wonder that if I had referred to the pedophilia advocate as “Father Denilson Lopes”, in less than 3 days the national and international media, prosecutors, federal police agents and a group of other creatures would appear in a hurry to denounce “another scandal of pedophilia in the Catholic Church”, omitting the obvious fact that, above all, Lopes is homosexual. By the way, Lopes is very well sheltered and protected in a Marxist academic environment that, rightly so, deserves the name “Imbecile Collective”, title of one of the books by the Brazilian philosopher Olavo de Carvalho. 
With university professors like Lopes and Mott, who now will write the “Pedophilic Collective” to open the secrets of that Marxist and homosexual closet? 
Mott’s option for Marxism and the homosexual movement was an issue of mere survival then. 
However, on one side it would have been good if he had become priest or bishop. Only this way his scandals would forcedly be unlocked from the closet to the public by a media always ready to cover up pedophilia inside of Marxism and in the movement homosexual, but that it never loses an opportunity to denounce priests who abuse boys. But, of course, without never mentioning their homosexuality, because it compromises fatally the homosexual movement. 
For the leftist media, in that dirty game the only immorally valid attitude is to compromise the Catholic Church and her stances against abortion and homosexuality. 
Certainty if Vatican embraced totally Marxism, promoting abortion and officially ordaining  homosexual priests, bishops and cardinals, the pedophilia scandals involving the Catholic Church would disappear mysteriously on the news media. After all, friends protect friends. 
If the Catholic Church made that official change, the Marxist media would be forced to seek another scapegoat: conservative evangelical churches. The show then would begin: daily scandals of pedophilia of ministers and other leaders bursting wildly before the public. 
The homosexual movement and the Marxist elite, which control the mainstream press, know very well what they do when they “report” cases of homosexual abuse of boys inside of the Catholic Church, using her as a scapegoat of the consequences of the conduct that they so much stimulate at schools and in society. 
But a homosexual is a homosexual, whether in the Catholic Church, in evangelical churches, in Marxism or in the movement homosexual. 
The vast majority of the pedophilia scandals in the Catholic Church involves boys’ sexual abuses, that is, homosexual priests abusing underage males. 
But why to think that only inside of the Catholic Church homosexuals commit sexual abuses against boys? Why to think that in Marxism and in the homosexual movement they automatically become sexual saints and protectors of children? 
Around world, nobody today is seeking more the children’s sexual liberation than homosexual groups. And, believe it or not, because of their fight for children’s sexual “liberation” they are considered children's advocates. In that sense, it seems that Luiz Mott just wants to be a pioneer in Brazil of that noble “liberation.” 
Even with those clear signs, see the special treatment that the Marxist media would grant Mott, depending on his choice: 
1. As a priest or bishop, Mott would be exposed as a demon of pedophilia inside of the Catholic Church. The media would use him to lead the public to understand that men’s sex with boys has everything to do with the Catholic Church and her moral values, but absolutely anything to do with homosexuality. He would be presented as a pedophilic scandal produced by the Catholic Church. They would say, “What a hideous and criminal thing: Father Mott involved in pedophilia!” 
2. As a Marxist and leader of the Brazilian gay movement, he is portrayed as an angel, having been awarded by former Brazilian president Fernando Henrique Cardoso and by the current Brazilian president Lula for having founded the Gay Group of Bahia, which wearisomely chatters that Brazil is having a “homocaust”. Even with his pro-pedophilia declarations, nobody in the mainstream press in Brazil calls him a “pedophilia scandal produced by the homosexual movement”. In fact, they would say, “What a beautiful thing: Dr. Luiz Mott, a professor in the Federal University of Bahia, advocating the children’s sexual rights!” 
While Mott stays in Marxism and in the homosexual movement, he will be protected and enjoying all the kinds of privileges from the press and the government. But woe to him if he wants to be a priest or bishop. The media won’t forgive him. 
Moral lesson? If one wants to hide his sexual perversions, he should not do it in the Catholic Church and any other Christian church. Marxism and the homosexual movements are the ideal closet to hide dirty secrets. 
How can the Catholic Church in Brazil face that media dishonesty suported by the homosexual movement and Marxism? 
By radically closing herself to the “liberation” theology and by radically opening her up to the Holy Spirit and his gifts. When Mott studied in a Catholic seminar, it was an excellent opportunity for him to receive deliverance. 
According to Mark 16, Jesus Christ’s follower has the power and the authority to minister healing and deliverance for the oppressed, and undeniably Mott entered the seminar oppressed by homosexuality. But Catholic seminaries were infected by liberation theology and by a sickening liberalism. Homosexuality is not an uncommon addiction among liberals, whether Catholics or not.
To avoid boys’ sexual abuse, the Catholic Church and all of the Christian churches should make a rigorous selection to hinder closed homosexuals from being ordained. And they should get ready, under the power and anointing of the Holy Spirit, to work with all those that enter in their seminars with homosexual problems. In fact, that apostolic approach should be rule for all those that enter in Christian churches. 
The answer to prevail over the biased media, the homosexual movement and the Marxist movements is the Holy Spirit. No power on the earth, under the earth or in the spiritual spheres is mightier than the Holy Spirit. 
The Holy Spirit is also the answer for homosexuals who, as Luiz Mott, enter in the seminar in search of spiritual solutions, but they find only liberalism and more homosexuality. The Holy Spirit delivers from the worst homosexual addictions, including sex with boys. 
Actually, by leaving the seminary, Mott saved the Catholic Church from a mega scandal. But if somebody there had helped him to know and experience the Holy Spirit, instead of saying today that Christianity is oppressive, Mott would be testifying that he was delivered from a big oppression. 
Now, who will save him who saved the Catholic Church?

No comments :