Homeschooling: the only educational hope in a Marxist Brazil

By Julio Severo

Marxist Dilma Rousseff, the favorite candidate of socialist Brazilian president Lula, is expected to win the next Brazilian presidential election and keep Brazil, and especially the school system, under rigid state control.

Homeschooling is illegal in Brazil. In fact, it is a crime, since socialists were able, in the creation of the new Brazilian constitution in 1988, to introduce a constitutional provision ordering all children to attend a school facility.

Hope for change is dim. Lula, who brags that he does not like reading, has made an education agreement with communist China, where Brazilian schools will follow the Chinese educational model.

And if Dilma Rousseff actually is elected on October 3, Brazil will keep suffering criminalizations, including of homeschooling. Anyway, she will be only obeying the Constitution…

In his 2 presidential terms, President Lula has put his administration machinery into action to work the decriminalization of abortion and the criminalization “homophobia”, even calling opposition to sodomy a “perverse disease”.

Nevertheless, he has enjoyed a very high popularity. The same Brazilian population that mostly disapproves abortion and is 99% “homophobic” (according to a poll conducted by a Brazilian institute connected to Lula’s party) gives Lula an approving rate of over 80%.

Late 2009, Lula changed the constitution to force four-year-old children to attend a school. But who cared?

TV channels were silent before this authority grab against the Brazilian family. Because they received in 2009 over 1 billion Real (almost 500,000 dollars) from the federal government to broadcast government propaganda, the Brazilian media kindly criticizes Lula and more kindly praises him. Red dictatorships in the past used to close down discordant media; Marxist Lula gratifies them.

So his presidential candidate is a direct beneficiary of his high popularity. And even though Lula is a friend of Fidel Castro, Hugo Chavez and Mahmud Ahmadinejad, his probable successor is more radical.

What are her qualifications for ruling Brazil?

Profession: Unknown

Activities:

1967 - agent for the Worker’s Politics Movement

06/10/68 - robbery of Banespa bank, Iguatemi Street, $ 80,000

12/10/68 - planned the murder of [American] Capt. Charles Chandler [accomplished in cold blood, in front of his house, his wife and child]

11/12/68 - robbery of Gun Store Diana, Seminario Street, 48 guns [stolen].

??/04/69 - National Liberation Command [another terrorist organization].

24/01/69 - Robbery of Quitauna Arms Depository - 63 FAU rifles, 3 INA guns, 4 munitions.

18/07/69 - Robbery of the Governor Ademar de Barros’ house [the money was never recovered].

01/08/68 - Robbery of the Mercantil of Sao Paulo bank.

??/09/69 - VAR Palmares [terrorist organization] Congress in Teresopolis.

20/09/69 - Robbery of the Public Force Police Quarters in Barro Branco.

Daughter of a Bulgarian Communist, Rousseff has no concern about her dark past, because Marxists have twisted in such a manner Brazilian policies that today, while communists and their families are given multimillion dollar reparations at the expense of the Brazilian taxpayers, victims of the communist terrorism and their families are ignored and poorly compensated, even in cases where people were murdered or left mutilated by bombs and guns.

The past criminals are the modern wealthy heroes.

Rousseff has a so radical record that any political creature resembling Al Gore running for president in Brazil would be easily mistaken as a right-wing candidate and fundamentalist Christian!

In fact, the only evangelical presidential candidate is a radical adherent of the Marxist Liberation Theology. She was a long time member of Lula’s Party, and her only reason to leave it was that instead of her, Dilma was chosen as presidential candidate. Today, she is a Green Party member.

All the other candidates are similarly Marxists and no of them are expected to change de Socialist provision in the Brazilian Constitution mandating school institutionalization for all children.

Christian churches and leaders could make a difference and save Brazil from such Marxist disaster. But the Socialist spell on the Brazilian media is on many churches. While most Catholic bishops are plagued by the Marxist Liberation Theology, a Protestant version has infected many traditional Protestant churches, and now even some Pentecostal churches are in the Marxist bandwagon.

The evangelical coordinator for the Dilma campaign is Bishop Manoel Ferreira, whose task is to draw evangelical churches and flocks and leaders to the Dilma fold. He is the president of the second largest Assembly of God denomination in Brazil.

The official policies of the Workers’ Party (believe it or not, no relation to the National Socialist German Workers’ Party, better known as Nazi Party, which also banned homeschooling in Germany in the 1930s) have clear pro-abortion and pro-sodomy provisions, but Dilma’s political propaganda avoids these “controversial” issues. Yet, her political friendships show her values. Last year she visited Spanish Prime Minister José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero, from the Marxist Spanish Workers’ Party. Zapatero has been famous and infamous for imposing abortion and anti-“homophobia” punishments in Spain.

Under Lula, Veja magazine (the Brazilian counterpart of Time magazine) charged that Brazilian school system was plagued by Marxist indoctrination. What hope is left for us Christians that believe that the State has no right to replace God?

Lula has been praising Dilma Rousseff. Hugo Chavez said that she is his candidate.

What about Obama? He has also welcomed her in the White House, which apparently sees no problem in the radical Marxist advance in Brazil. (Is he from the Workers’ Party too?)

Well, as a radical Socialist clone of Lula, Rousseff is in perfect peace with Fidel Castro, Hugo Chavez and Mahmud Ahmadinejad. And, of course, Obama is in peace with her.

Today the Brazilian cultural environment is much like to the US, but without any significant and large conservative opposition. Whereas Obama faces a lot of opposition from conservative Christian groups and leaders, Brazilian president Lula faces nothing of this sort. And his probable successor will enjoy his success too, because with all children under forced state indoctrination and media and churches under powerful financial spells, control is something very easy.

In this dark (oops, red) Brazilian picture, homeschooling is the only option for Christian churches and families to save their children, even though the cost is an illegal, underground lifestyle.

Roman Empire had its emperors that saw themselves as gods. In Brazil, god is the Socialist State. And this red god wants all the Brazilian children under its sacred “educational” control.

When my pregnant wife and I were reported because of homeschooling and child vaccination in Brazil, local government officials told us, “You can decide whatever you want about your children, but the ultimate decision belongs to the government”. Today, we are away from Brazil.

In the most important homeschooling case in Brazil, where the defendant was an Attorney General himself, the Higher Court of Justice ruled in 2002 that “children do not belong to their parents”.

These poor “children that do not belong to their parents” are being indoctrinated today to become in the future the Marxist doctors, teachers, politicians, governors and even Christian leaders. This is a dreadful prospect for the educationally-choiceless children in Brazil.

Brazilian law is very rarely enforced to punish political socialist abuses and power grab — and nowadays it is hindered from being enforced against Marxist terrorists —, but it has been steadily enforced to punish parents that think that they are free to educate their children away from the state model.

In a time of prevailing Marxism in the Brazilian culture, homeschooling is the only way for Brazilian parents to protect their children from the pervasive educational control of the state Moloch.

If the early persecuted Roman Christians could worship Jesus in the catacombs, why cannot Brazilian Christians educate their children for Jesus there?

Source: www.lastdayswatchman.blogspot.com

Marxist Terrorist is Next Brazil President

Brazilian President Seeks to Outlaw Spanking

By Matthew Cullinan Hoffman, Latin America Correspondent

BRASILIA, July 16, 2010 (LifeSiteNews.com) - Brazil's socialist President Luiz Lula da Silva is proposing changes to the nation's Children and Adolescents Statute that will prohibit parents from spanking their children or applying any other form of corporal punishment.

In accordance with the proposed law, parents caught spanking or pinching their children, after a warning, could be required to receive psychological treatment. The case could also be turned over to child protective services, according to the AP.

"The proposed definition is applicable not only in the domestic sphere, but also for the other caretakers of children and adolescents - in schools, shelters, prisons.  The bill is seeking a cultural change," said Carmen Oliveira, National Subsecretary for the Promotion of the Rights of Children and Adolescents.

"If punishment and whipping resolve the problem, the people wouldn't have corruption in the country.  There wouldn't be so much crime in the country," Lula claimed in his comments on the bill.

However, Antonio Carlos Gomes da Costa, who was one of the authors of the original Children and Adolescents Statute, disagrees.

"I would say that spanking, if it is applied with judgment and moderation, is not a violation of human rights," he said in a recent interview. "For example, a child insists in putting her finger into the light socket, and her father tells her it is dangerous, that she can't, and she nonetheless insists, to give her a little spank or a strong verbal scolding, which I find to be preferable, is not 'destructive.' Punishment is necessary."

In order to act against parents who use corporal punishment on their children, the government will need at least one third party witness, such as another family member, or a fellow worker in a daycare center.

Lula's anti-spanking initiative is only one in along line of anti-family policies, which include attempts to further depenalize abortion, to censor TV to prohibit condemnation of sodomy, and to push the homosexual agenda within international institutions.

Related LifeSiteNews coverage:

Brazilian Government Seeks to Remove "Homophobic" Christian Programming from Daytime TV
http://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/2009/may/09051502. html

Brazilian President Will Seek to "Criminalize Words and Acts Offensive to Homosexuality"
http://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/2009/apr/09043008.h tml

Brazilian President Luiz Lula Defends Abortion, Gay Unions
http://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/2008/sep/08091815.h tml

Organization of American States Approves Homosexual "Human Rights" Resolution
http://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/2008/jun/08061201.h tml

Source: http://www.lifesite.net/ldn/viewonsite.html?articleid=10071602

For many other articles on Brazil, see: http://lastdayswatchman.blogspot.com

Swine flu: Who paid the cost for the ghost pandemic?

By Julio Severo 

During many months I have been following the international news services and, by reading several secular U.S. and English newspapers, a fact was clear: the pandemic swine flu was shrouded in serious ethical and medical problems, including vaccinated youths’ deaths. And now we have the news that the vaccination was unnecessary. 

The English newspaper Daily Mail denounced in headline “The pandemic that never was: Drug firms ‘encouraged world health body to exaggerate swine flu threat’”. Then the article says, “Declaring a swine flu pandemic was a 'monumental error', driven by profit-hungry drug companies spreading fear, an influential report has concluded.” The full article is here. 

There is also the article “O conto da vacina suína” (the swine vaccine fable), published by the liberal Brazilian newspaper Folha de S. Paulo, which exposes scandals involving the Ministry of Health in Brazil and the World Health Organization (WHO), and the dishonest way how WHO changed the definition of pandemic exclusively to fatten pharmaceutical companies, which profited some 10 billion dollars with the ghost pandemic in 2009. 

That is same WHO that also changed the real meaning of homosexuality in the 1990s, removing it from the list of perverted behaviors, in order to serve the interests of multimillionaires lobbies. 

When defining what is and what is not, money, pressure and greed are a powerful persuasion. Under that persuasion, perverted behaviors get normalized, and what is not a pandemic becomes a pandemic!

In the ghost pandemic issue, what a lot of people suspected is now coming to light, and it is no wonder that the number of those vaccinated has not been high in the US and England, leaving enormous stagnant and non-used stocks of the useless vaccine that cost millions of dollars that could have been better invested in the population well-being. 

Even so, the pharmaceutical companies continue in their crazy race to sell their vaccines to countries foolish enough to buy the story of the pandemic. 

I could have informed the Brazilian public much earlier, but Blog Julio Severo (the Portuguese version of Last Days Watchman) has been for years showing the obvious: The socialist Lula administration doesn’t deserve trust. Would you trust a government that supports abortion, which is the cowardly killing of the most vulnerable and defenseless human beings? 

The big responsible for the vaccination effort in Brazil was the minister against health, José Temporão, an abortion supporter. He sees abortion merely as a “public-health issue”, so if pharmaceutical companies create a vaccine to eliminate this health “problem”, the maniac for mass vaccination campaigns will be greatly happy to make one partnership else with them.

Nevertheless, the Brazilian population thought that they could trust the would-be butcher. They got vaccinated. The obedience — or should I say foolishness? — was so big that the country that became world champion in vaccination against the inexistent and unreal swine flu pandemic was Brazil. More than 70 million Brazilians were vaccinated. 

Now, the Lula administration is smiling. The minister against health is smiling. Pharmaceutical companies, with their pockets full of the money from Brazilian citizens, are more than happy and leaping for joy. And the Brazilian people are smiling, without at least perceiving what is happening. They pay, via taxes, with the money of their own pockets the government’s foolishnesses, and they smile idiotically. 

And ultimately it is the government that gets the prize. In 2009, Lula received the Chatham House Prize for “for being a key driver of stability and integration in Latin America”. One of the chief sponsors of that international prize was the pharmaceutical company GlaxoSmithKline. In the late 2009, GlaxoSmithKline received R$ 465.532.000,00 (more than 200 million dollars) from the Brazilian government, in a purchase without public tender, of doses of the vaccine against the swine flu “pandemic”. 

One good turn deserves another. Pharmaceutical companies sponsor international tributes to Lula’s uncontrollable and insatiable ego, and Lula satisfies the uncontrollable and insatiable greed of those companies by sustaining ghost pandemics that fill their safes. 

But the high cost was really paid by the vaccinated Brazilians. See some repercussions of the vaccine in the Brazilian media: 

Young man dies after receiving flu shot in Londrina, Brazil  

Student dies after receiving vaccine against flu  

Girl dies after receiving vaccine  

Child dies after receiving H1N1 vaccine

Baby dies when receiving vaccine against flu   

So government and pharmaceutical companies take your money, go on a spree and, to justify so much unbridled spending, in the end you and your family have to submit to the shot prickle and all its consequences. 

A country like this is a perfect corral to feed the greed of the powerful and corrupt, which would go through any artifice to stop anything hindering their profits. 

During the 2008 Brazilian mass vaccination campaign against rubella, denunciations by Blog Julio Severo (the Portuguese version of Last Days Watchman) drew not only the attention from the liberal media (see article in the major Brazilian newspaper O Dia blaming me for the low vaccination numbers), but also the anger from the Brazilian federal Ministry of Health, which counted on a team of internet professionals to sabotage my articles on the vaccination campaign. The goal was to post texts and comments wherever my texts had been published, questioning them, breaking their force and destroying my credibility. A guerrilla work. I eventually learnt about this because a woman connected to the team talked to her friend, which in turn is my friend!

It was a significant coincidence, which exposed that there were bigwigs interested in sabotaging the impact of my articles on the vaccination campaign. According to the information I received, the Ministry of Health was also planning other actions against me, including legal, but I suppose that there was not time to implement them, because in few weeks I left Brazil. That is the cost you pay for warning people. 

Therefore, next time that the government and liberal media appear with a scaremongering campaign trying to convince you of another ghost pandemic, distrust. 

How not to distrust a government that is interested only in what is in your pocket?

Portuguese version of this article: Gripe suína: Quem pagou o preço pela pandemia fantasma

Source: www.lastdayswatchman.blogspot.com

What is behind the campaign “Brazil Free of Rubella”?

http://lastdayswatchman.blogspot.com/2008/08/what-is-behind-campaign-brazil-free-of.html

Lula’s foolishness is joke in Israel 

By Julio Severo 

In Brazil, when we look at Lula, we don’t know whether to laugh or cry. If his foolishness, which competes with the vast territorial size of Brazil, didn’t produce such devastating results, we would only laugh at a great and arrogant blunderer. 

However, his messes have been producing results. To protect the Iranian nuclear program, Lula made a deal between Brazil, Iran and Turkey. See here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mPxYGiUXb-Q

That program is entirely in the man’s hands that says openly that he wants to sweep Israel from the face of the earth. 

How did Brazil come to the point of having in the presidency a foolish man allied to the atomic pervert of Iran? 

To avoid crying, Israel made a joke of that foolishness of the president that embarrasses Brazil. See the comedy in this link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m6nXfX22fOc

Seeing the Israeli comedy on Lula, you feel like laughing. 

However, seeing Lula in the reality, you feel like crying, because the messes that he makes are not jokes nor fiction. 

Portuguese version of this article: Falta de juízo de Lula vira piada em Israel

Source: www.lastdayswatchman.blogspot.com

What every Christian should know about Israel

Socialism, Islam and Hell

Muslim suicides surpassed by Protestant and Jewish suicides

Brazil’s Lula, the friend of Iran’s Ahmadinejad

Iran, hatred of Jews and the schizophrenic Lula administration

World amazed by unprecedented address by President Lula at the UN Human Rights Council

The cost of the high popularity of Lula

The great Brazilian miracle

Lula, the meddler

Lula humiliates Israel

LifeSiteNews in Portuguese Reaches First Birthday

By Matthew Cullinan Hoffman, Latin America Correspondent

MEXICO CITY, June 3, 2010 (LifeSiteNews.com) — Notícias Pró-Família (Pro-Family News), LifeSiteNews.com’s service in Portuguese, has completed its first year of service, with over 42,000 page views and wide republishing of its articles in the Portuguese-speaking blogosphere.

Although the first articles published on the site are dated from early April of 2009, they were posted in late May, with backdating to reflect the date of their authorship.

Pro-life and pro-family activist Julio Severo provides the translations to the site, and says that it has made a difference in the debate over life and family issues in Brazil, a country whose liberal president has promoted the depenalization of abortion, as well as special rights and even media censorship in favor of the homosexualist cause,

“Through its Portuguese version, Notícias Pró-Família, LSN show that the threats Brazilians are facing are already reality in the US, Canada and Europe,” said Severo, commenting on the site’s impact. “So LSN articles are uniquely equipped to inform and prepare Brazilians concerned about family issues to confront the cultural war.”

He also notes that “Notícias Pró-Família has had a special role in special battles. In the known case of the nine-year-old Brazilian girl, whose twins were aborted and whose abortion was opposed by Brazilian archbishop Sobrinho Cardoso and supported by archbishop Fisichella, Brazilians learned the international impact of this pro-life battle. And they learned who did right and who did wrong. No media in Brazil, secular or otherwise, reported more on this case than Notícias Pró-Família.”

Following the coverage, Notícias Pró-Família was given the Blog Apostolado da Vida (Apostolate of Life Blog) award by the Brazilian organization Pró-Vida de Anápolis, which is one of the most influential pro-life and pro-family organizations at the national level in Brazil.

Since it began posting translations of LSN articles last year on Google’s Blogger hosting service, over 150 bloggers have become members of the site, and the translations are widely reproduced in the Brazilian blogosphere.

LSN hopes in the future to add a site with Spanish translations of its articles, and eventually original Portuguese and Spanish-language reporting for readers of those languages.

Related Links:                                   

Notícias Pró-Família (Pro-Family News — LifeSiteNews in Portuguese)
http://noticiasprofamilia.blogspot.com/

Source: http://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/2010/jun/10060314.html

Flotilla of the disguised peace receives forceful defense of Turkey 

By Julio Severo 

Turkish government is mobilizing to have Israeli authorities judged by the International Criminal Court in The Hague, Netherlands, because Israel “dared” to inspect “humanitarian” ships destined to Palestinian Arabs. The ships, coming from Turkey, also contained hidden weapons. 

After all, how will Palestinian Arabs be able to continue their attacks against Israel without the “humanitarian” help of weapons?  

Turkey, a mostly Muslim nation that has a long history of shedding of Christian blood, got hysterical about the actions of Israel, which exposed the disguised humanitarianism. The “pacifists” faced the Israeli military inspectors with extreme violence. And they received the due treatment and answer. 

Since when are weapons for use against Israeli citizens “humanitarian” help? If, in a daring opposed scenery, a flotilla with similar “help” were destined to the Kurdish separatist minority in Turkey, would Turks react with delicacy? In fact, the same Turkey that demands from Israel a state for Palestinian Arabs also persecutes the Kurdish minority in Turkey, because they want a state! The kind Turks are determined to extinguish the Kurdish wish.

For Turks, there can be persecution and blood-shedding at will, provided it is not against their chosen Muslim faith. That is why Turkey condemns UN attempts of condemning Sudan, whose Muslim government murdered about half a million of Sudaneses that were not Muslim. Most of those massacred were Christian. 

In the UN Security Council — where for decades Israel has been systematically condemned by pressure from Islamic nations —, Sudan has been protected from condemnation. Even if six million Jews were being murdered today, by sheer ideological pressure UN would eventually manage to condemn Israel and clear Sudan.

Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdog said: “It’s not possible for a Muslim to commit genocide. That’s why we are comfortable [with the Islamic president's visit of Sudan to Turkey].”

Turkey has no reason to admit and oppose genocides committed by Muslims. Immediately before the World War 1, the Islamic government in Turkey murdered hundreds of thousands of Christian Armenian men, women and children in cold blood. Until today, Turkey doesn’t tolerate when somebody says that that massacre of innocents was genocide. 

Turkey speaks from the position of one that committed genocide and of one that today defends the genocidal Islamic government in Sudan. 

Israel answers from the position of one that suffered the genocide of more than 6 million Jews during the World War 2. With that tragic experience, Israel can never treat carelessly the defense of her families, even when a weapons cargo is disguised in “innocent” ships of leftist peace activists bringing candies and medicines.

As to the International Criminal Court, what about Turkey and Sudan giving an account of their atrocities against innocent populations?

Portuguese version of this article: Flotilha da paz disfarçada ganha defesa enérgica da Turquia

Source: www.lastdayswatchman.blogspot.com

The folly of man’s planning 

By Julio Severo 

Modern Christian families have usually 2 children. Single women with three or four children fathered by different men are not a rare sight, at least not in Brazil. An unmarried man with several children by several women is a growing modern reality. That is the horrendous legacy of family planning. 

The preaching of family planning, initiated by lesbian theosophist Annie Besant in the predominantly Protestant England in the 19th century, achieved its objective: today’s England is much less Christian, and men and women are much less prone to get married. Of those getting married, the pattern is two children at the most. 

Margaret Sanger, inventor of the term “birth control” in the early 20th century, used to say that birth control would eventually destroy Christianity. Looking at England, nobody could doubt Sanger, founder of the International Planned Parenthood Federation, which is today the largest abortion organization in the world. 

As in England, the family-planning fever, launched by New Age leaders, spread as fire throughout Protestant nations. Next, ideas of racial purification (eugenics) and population control came in the same trail. German Nazis and the Soviet communists benefitted a lot from those ideas. 

If the goal of the population-control agenda was to indoctrinate families to have two children, the success was total, at least in Europe and in the US. But in the trail a shady picture appeared. 

With the divorce of sex from procreation, marriage came under contempt. With marriage despised, sexual freedom came, where a man is free to make sex to whoever he wants, with no marital responsibility. The result, as we have seen, is many and increasing cases of single women having several children fathered by different men. And equally bizarre cases of men that, as perverted hummingbirds pollinating throughout their world, live their lives impregnating a woman after another. 

I met a man that, when young and without God, lived unconcerned about marriage, just getting busy with pleasures, which yielded to him eight children by eight different women. Later, he accepted Jesus and became a minister. 

But there are cases of much younger men that may also brag that they have eight or more children with different women. These children, with several siblings, will never have a normal father’s love, while their fathers continue their insane contests for new women to impregnate.

At the end, a gigantic mass of illegitimate unborn babies, by different fathers and mothers, are aborted or get permission to be born. And the statistics for children born outside marriage and natural family are not beautiful: 70% delinquents come from these irresponsible relationships.

In past times, it took a lifetime for a depraved man to impregnate several women. Today, with sex much easier and free, young men can impregnate a variety of women in a shorter time, and the results are always several abortions or illegitimate children.

Instead of correcting the problem by valuing natural family and establishing punishments for irresponsible conducts, social engineers prefer to redefine family, removing its original sense of “father and mother married with children beget by them” to benefit any deformed grouping, regardless of marriage, composed of:  

* A cohabiting man and woman bringing up children from previous relationships. 

* A divorced man with a divorced woman bringing up children from previous marriages. 

* A man with another man bringing up children fathered by other people. 

Those deformed groups, which are extremely problematic, are included as “family” in sick cultures, and it is no wonder that governments say that “family” has “problems”. Probably, governments want intentionally the classification of those deformed groups as “family” in order to have full powers and excuses to interfere, mutilate, traumatize, damage, deform and destroy the power of the natural family. 

Instead of promoting the growth of the natural family, malicious and opportunistic governments promote the growth of deformed groups and their valorization as “family”. Instead of valuing an increase in births in natural families, irresponsible governments, with their population-control doctrine, eventually promote explosion of abortions and illegitimate births. 

The family-planning doctrine was able to reduce drastically the number of marriages in the Western nations. It was also able to reduce drastically the number of children in the increasingly fewer formal marriages today. But in the process it provoked the disarray of sexual relationships and unrestrained procreation by men and women that want nothing to do with marriage. 

The population-control doctrine, which is reducing marriages and families, is provoking an unprecedented explosion of fatherless and family-less children. As the number of marriages decreases, the number of illegitimate babies increases continuously.  

The abundant access to legal abortion in the Western nations has, for the time being, been able to varnish the enormity of their demographic woes, because a lot of women that were supposed to be with 8 or more children by different men are single and childless, continuing “normally” their careers and active sexual lives. The cost of the sexual freedom is an immense blood shedding that is impossible to measure. 

To men that don’t want to impregnate woman after woman, the only option left is anal (homosexual) sex and become other piece in the population-control game to destroy natural marriage, contributing for many of the gay demands for the disfigurement of the natural family. 

Sex, any sex, is promoted today, provided that it mutilates, traumatizes, damages, deforms or even destroys children, values, Christianity, marriage and family. It is not without purpose that the International Planned Parenthood Federation is engaged in the promotion of abortion, homosexuality, feminism and sexual education in the schools. 

The consequences are already here. And in the next decades, more consequences will come. Because of the reduced number of children, Europe is in process of being dominated by large Muslim families. But the European leaders’ most urgent questions in the next years are: with a population of young workers more and more reduced, how to support social security? What to do with the enormous number of seniors increasing continuously? Netherlands, formerly a strong Protestant nation, has given the official answer: euthanasia.

Netherlands, religiously faithful to the population-control doctrine, has been pioneering in homosexual “marriage”, children’s adoption by gay couples, legal acceptance of marijuana and other drugs, etc. Besides euthanasia, Netherlands has been exporting abortion to other nations, through her infamous abortion boat. And for the sake of diversity and demoncracy, Netherlands has the dishonor of having the first pedophilic party in the world, composed mostly of homosexual pedophiles.

Netherlands and other modern nations reflect the fulfillment of Margaret Sanger’s wish: birth control destroys Christian churches and their influence on society

That is the cost of the acceptance of the man’s planning. That is the cost of the rejection of the planning of God. 

To marry and have several children inside of marriage is folly, fools in this world say. But this is the “foolishness” of God. Not to marry and fill the earth with children’s blood or fill it with traumatized children without a father, without a family and without a moral direction: that is the man’s foolishness without God. That is the legacy of family planning.

Portuguese version of this article: A loucura do planejamento do homem

Source: www.lastdayswatchman.blogspot.com

Rivers of Blood: A Brazilian pro-life Evangelical writes about the contraceptive culture and prophecies in Revelation (short version published in LifeSiteNews)

Blood in the rivers: the contraceptive culture and prophecies in Revelation (original version)

Leader of Brazil's Homosexual Movement Admits Existence of Ex-Gays

Says, "we need you heterosexuals, we love you so that you may reproduce children to become homosexuals"

By Matthew Cullinan Hoffman, Latin America Correspondent

BRAZIL, May 12, 2010 (LifeSiteNews.com) - Luiz Mott, the undisputed leader of Brazil's homosexual movement, has admitted on national television that no one is born homosexual, and that people can change their sexual orientations.

In a recent appearance on the highly popular late night talk show "Programa do Jô" aired on Brazil's Globo network, Mott told the host that he is a "former heterosexual."

"I am an ex-heterosexual in the same way that there are ex-gays, people that were not 100% homosexual," said Mott.  "They had some experiences, did not like them and then joined the other side."

Although Mott attributed change to people who were "not 100% homosexual," he made it clear to host Jô Soares that he believes that "all human beings have, as Freud said it, a bisexual desire," and that sexual preference is something fluid and changeable.

"Fortunately human sexuality is cultural and constructed and can change. I think I am not going to change anymore because I am very much accustomed and happy," he told Soares.

"Usually I say, we need you heterosexuals, we love you so that you may reproduce children to become homosexuals...new gays and new lesbians," added Mott during the interview, which was broadcast on April 24.

As LifeSiteNews has noted in past articles Mott is also known for his open sexual attraction to adolescents, and regards restrictions on sex with minors to be based on "prejudice."

Related links:

Full Interview with Mott on Programa do Jô (Portuguese)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v8LvDghc30k&feature=related

Excerpts of interview translated into English by Julio Severo
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x7G3GYfYV3Y

Source: http://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/2010/may/10051212.html

Anthony Comstock: the first pro-life activist in the modern history 

Pioneer in the fight against abortion and in efforts to press the Congress and politicians to protect families and their children and adolescents 

By Julio Severo 

To expose children and adolescents to pornographic materials and movies under the cloak of “sexual education”, showing explicit scenes and positions of sex, including homosexual. To expose children and adolescents to methods called of “family planning”, including abortion, to hinder pregnancy as if it were a sexually transmissible disease. That, unhappily, is the pattern of criminal violence prevailing at the schools and in the society when perverts are not kept from changing the laws and the culture. 

The vast majority of the efforts to expose children and adolescents to the pornographic sexual education and information and “services” of abortion and contraception is a result from the campaigns by the International Planned Parenthood Federation, founded in the 1950s by Margaret Sanger. It was a cultural and pornographic imperialism that defeated legal barriers firstly in the US and later expanded itself as a virus to the rest of the world. 

Today the International Planned Parenthood Federation is the largest world promoter of contraception, abortion and pornographic sexual education in the schools. 

According to the ideology of Sanger, birth control

Eventually would destroy Christianity. 

Eventually would exterminate the black race. 

Eventually would purify the white race. 

Eventually would promote abortion as the women’s human right. 

The sexual violence officially clothed as education of children and adolescents today is something criminal, and it is this way that Anthony Comstock treated it. Since late 1860s, his action was aimed at fighting propagandas of pornography, abortion and birth control. Born in 1844 in Connecticut in a town called New Canaan, since childhood he loved to read the Bible and he was an evangelical Christian that didn’t practice Christianity just inside of the church walls. Eventually he became an active worker in the Young Men’s Christian Association (YMCA) in New York. YMCA was a much known evangelical organization, where even D.L. Moody was an active member.

In that time, YMCA founded the Society for the Suppression of Vice to advance the work of Comstock, where he worked as secretary until his death. 

He fought the social vices by lobbying legislators. He traveled to Washington DC and convinced congressmen about the need of laws to protect families and their children and adolescents from pornography. Such pioneering efforts were the first demonstrations of pro-family lobby, or campaigns to press and influence legislators to prioritize the well-being of the families. 

His pressures on the Congress successfully led to the 1873 establishment of a strong federal law banning the transportation of obscene, lewd, or lascivious items in the mail. The law, with penalties up to ten years in prison, was eventually known as Comstock Law. 

To implement the law, Comstock was officially appointed for the United States Post Office, with powers to enforce the banning of pornography. From 1873 to 1915, he conducted spectacular police raids on pornographic publishers and vendors.

In one year alone, 14,200 lb of pornographic photographic plates, 134,000 lb of pornographic books, 200,000 photographs and images, 31,500 boxes of pills and potions, and 60,300 obscene articles were destroyed. It is estimated that fifteen tons of pornographic books and publications, and four million photographs, were destroyed. This result was not incidental: Comstock took his career and responsibilities very seriously.

The Comstock Law is still in effect in federal laws to prohibit obscenity. It is vigorously enforced regarding child pornography on the Internet and in print. So the modern repression to the children’s pornographic exploration is established on the pioneering efforts of an active evangelical Christian. But after the death of Comstock in 1915, his law began to succumb to the systematic attacks by Sanger, because there was not anyone that was able or wanted to fill the role of Comstock.

Even so, Rev. Billy Sunday (1862-1935), probably the greatest preacher to large crowds before Billy Graham, condemned alcoholism, pornography, birth control and other social evils. Of Presbyterian orientation, he denounced Sanger and her ideology until his last days. Among Catholics, the denunciations came from Fr. John Ryan, in the 1930s. Not much different from Sunday, Comstock saw alcoholic beverage as harmful. By coincidence, Sanger died as an alcoholic in 1966.

Anthony Comstock accomplished great legal feats of protection of families and he faced, in his own generation, many abortion and pornography activists. Yet, during his lifetime, who prevailed was him.

In early 1915, President Woodrow Wilson named Comstock to lead the American Delegation to the International Purity Conference, held that year in San Francisco. As historian Paul Boyer concedes, of the 4,000 delegates present “there were probably not two persons who did not unreservedly share his point of view.” After this crowning event, Comstock left this world.

Comstock was successful. Between 1873 and 1877, he “probably prosecuted more abortionists... than any other person in the United States.” After his five years of aggressive action, “abortion-related advertising declined precipitously throughout the nation.” Indeed, historian James Mohr concludes that because of Comstock’s work, “[a]bortion’s period of commercial visibility, which had lasted since the 1840’s, was over.”

Another historian of the abortion issue, Leslie Reagan, concludes that abortion was off the agenda of organized religion until the late 1950’s simply because, “for nearly a century, abortion was a crime and no social movement suggested otherwise.” This was one of the large achievements of Comstock.

How is it that for almost 100 years the Comstock Law made morality to prevail above immorality? How is it that one man was able for a long period of forty years to scare and defeat a crowd of wealthy pornographic, spiritualistic, aborting and immoral Goliaths? The life of Comstock demonstrates that he who is in the Lord makes exploits.

While Comstock fought against pornography, abortion and contraception, Protestant churches were blooming with genuine revivals. During the unbeatable Comstock era, D.L. Moody was used by God in great revivals, Billy Sunday began his ministry that reached America from one end to the other and the Pentecostal movement was born in America to change the history of the world evangelism.

The Comstock era, which was marked by the greatest Pentecostal revivals ever seen in modern time, was an era where America was an indisputably and predominantly Protestant nation.

According to the 1911 Encyclopedia Britannica, the US religious scenery was in 1890: 68% were Protestants and 30% were Catholic. But since contraception and abortion became totally legalized in the US — contraception in the late 1960s and abortion in 1973 —, the scenery has changed. From 1972 to 1993, Protestants constituted about 63% of the US population. By 2002, they were 52% and for the first time since the founding of the US, now Protestants are a minority. The dream of Sanger came true: birth control is destroying Christianity in America.

Today, with the domination of pornography, abortion and contraception in the American society, America lost her formerly Protestant predominance.

America and the world need revival. And genuine revival goes together with social justice, as the many social conquests of Comstock attest.

This article is only a summary of the e-book “Anthony Comstock: the first pro-family champion in the modern history”, written by Julio Severo. To read the full e-book, follow this link: http://www.scribd.com/doc/31144484/Anthony-Comstock-the-First-Profamily-Champion-in-the-Modern-History

Portuguese version of this article: Anthony Comstock: o primeiro ativista pró-vida da história moderna

Source: www.lastdayswatchman.blogspot.com