Thursday, September 30, 2010

Brazilian Presidential Front Runner Declares Herself ‘Personally Against’ Abortion

Brazilian Presidential Front Runner Declares Herself ‘Personally Against’ Abortion

By Matthew Cullinan Hoffman, Latin America Correspondent
BRASILIA, Brazil, September 29, 2010 (LifeSiteNews.com) — In an apparent attempt to counteract a massive pro-life internet campaign against her party, Brazilian presidential front runner Dilma Rousseff told the nation’s media today that she is a Catholic and is “personally against abortion.”
“In my conception, I am favorable to the valuing of life,” Rousseff said. “And I am personally against abortion, which is violence against a woman.”
Rousseff made the statements following a meeting with various religious and political leaders, which was organized in apparent response to the dissemination of numerous internet texts and videos criticizing her and the socialist Labor Party for supporting abortion.
“I told the pastors that, from the point of view of the presidency, there are women who have recourse to abortion and they have to be cared for,” said Rousseff, referring to the Brazilian policy of giving medical care to women who have induced abortions, despite their illegality. “We respect and value life,” she added.
Asked if her position was in conflict with that of the pro-abortion Labor Party, of which she is a member, Rousseff clarified that “the government [of the Labor Party] has always had one position.  Now, we are a democratic party.”
However Rousseff also repeated the Labor Party’s public position on abortion, calling it a “public health” issue, a term commonly used by international abortionist organizations. She also said she opposed a plebiscite on the matter, which in strongly pro-life Brazil would lead almost certainly to a rejection of abortion.
Pro-life activist Julio Severo, who has strongly opposed the Labor Party’s reelection, told LifeSiteNews that Rousseff’s words indicate her “lack of ideological clarity and honesty.”
“She says that she is personally against abortion, and again emphasized that she ‘defends the treatment of abortion as an issue of public health’,” he added.
“Just like Dilma, [Brazilian President Luiz] Lula also declared himself to be a Catholic, said he was personally against abortion and defended the treatment of abortion as a public health issue,” said Severo. “In 2002, candidate Lula had also made an agreement to not allow his future government to promote abortion and homosexualism. But after his election, his government promoted abortion, at the national and international level, so much that we fear, in the best of hypotheses, that Lula had suffered some kind of attack of amnesia.”
Dilma Rousseff is widely viewed as the handpicked successor of President Luiz Lula da Silva, who, despite his pro-abortion position, is leaving office with an 80% approval rating.
Abortion is illegal in Brazil and is punished with criminal penalties in all cases except rape. Opinion polls indicate that over two-thirds of Brazilians oppose the further decriminalization of abortion.
Related LifeSiteNews coverage:
Brazilian Pastor Threatened by Government for Opposing Pro-Abortion Policies
http://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/2010/sep/10091713.html
Divulgation: Blog Julio Severo in English: http://www.lastdayswatchman.blogspot.com

Saturday, September 18, 2010

Brazilian Pastor Threatened by Government for Opposing Pro-Abortion Policies

Brazilian Pastor Threatened by Government for Opposing Pro-Abortion Policies

By Matthew Cullinan Hoffman, Latin America Correspondent
BRAZIL, September 17, 2010 (LifeSiteNews.com) — A Brazilian pastor is being threatened with “legal measures” by government officials following a sermon condemning the ruling party's support for decriminalizing abortion, the homosexual agenda, and infanticide committed by indigenous tribes in the Amazon rain forest.
In a YouTube video that has now been viewed over 1.6 million times, Pastor Paschoal Piragine Jr. of the First Baptist Church of Curitiba, warns his flock that the ruling Brazilian Labor Party (PT) is seeking to create “institutionalized evil” in Brazil.
“We need to take a stand and say: ‘we don’t want this in our country,’ and look for people to represent us to say, ‘I will vote against such things.’ Otherwise, evil will be made official, and God will have no other option but to judge our land,” says Piragine.
“And I would not only ask you to pray — I think we should all pray — but to take a stand, and when you vote, to vote for people who take a clear stance against these things and make a commitment to fight in the national Congress, and in the institutions of government, against the legalization of evil,” he adds.
After showing his flock a video presentation on the pro-abortion and anti-family political movements that threaten to legalize abortion and destroy traditional marriage, Piragine notes that the PT “has made a commitment on this issue.”
“During this year’s meeting, where they select their representatives, [President Luiz Lula] made them pass an agreement on these issues. In other words, if a PT representative or senator, votes against any of these laws in accordance with his conscience, he is expelled from the party. Two federal representatives were expelled from the PT for expressing their opposition to abortion.”
Noting that some Catholic bishops had already urged Brazilians to vote against the PT, Piragine adds, “I would tell you the same thing. Some people won't like what I am saying, but I am saying it very clearly.”
“As a pastor I have never done this. I am not telling you to vote for A or B. I am going to tell you whom not to vote for: for people who are working in favor of evil in our land. Otherwise, my dear ones, God will judge our land.”

Angry Response

Apparently alarmed by the massive distribution of the video, high officials of President Luiz Lula’s regime have been lashing out at Piragine.
In an interview on Brazil's CBN Radio, PT member and federal congressman Enio Verri expressed outrage at the video.
“With his own words he committed a great sin and will have to respond to his own community,” said Verri. “But the PT is going to take the appropriate legal measures as quickly as possible, be sure of that.”
The Leader of Government of the Brazilian Chamber of Deputies, which is the rough equivalent of the Speaker of the House in the United States, has responded with a public letter denying Piragine’s accusations and claiming that members of the PT have the right to dissent from the party line based on their consciences.
“It is not true that the deputies of the PT were expelled for opposing abortion,” writes Deputy Gilmar Alves Machado. “It is true that they had conflict with women’s movements over issues related to abortion, but they were not expelled. Because of those problems, they were punished by the PT, which led them to change parties.”
Contact information:
Embassy of Brazil in the USA
3006 Massachusetts Avenue, NW
Washington, DC
20008-3634
Phone: (202) 238-2700
Fax: (202) 238-2827
Email: ambassador@brasilemb.org
Embassy of Brazil in Canada
450 Wilbrod Street
Ottawa, Ontario, K1N 6M8
Phone: (613) 237-1090 or (613) 755-5160
Fax: (613) 237-6144
E-mail: mailbox@brasembottawa.org
Embassies of Brazil to other Nations: http://www.embassyworld.com/embassy/Brazil/Brazil1.html
Related LifeSiteNews coverage:
Brazilian Government Joins UN to Urge Latin American Nations to Depenalize Abortion
http://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/2010/jul/10073001.html
Brazilian Government Seeks to Remove "Homophobic" Christian Programming from Daytime TV
http://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/2009/may/09051502.html
Brazilian President Luiz Lula Defends Abortion, Gay Unions
http://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/2008/sep/08091815.html
Source: LifeSiteNews

Monday, August 30, 2010

Homeschooling: the only educational hope in a Marxist Brazil

Homeschooling: the only educational hope in a Marxist Brazil

By Julio Severo
Marxist Dilma Rousseff, the favorite candidate of socialist Brazilian president Lula, is expected to win the next Brazilian presidential election and keep Brazil, and especially the school system, under rigid state control.
Homeschooling is illegal in Brazil. In fact, it is a crime, since socialists were able, in the creation of the new Brazilian constitution in 1988, to introduce a constitutional provision ordering all children to attend a school facility.
Hope for change is dim. Lula, who brags that he does not like reading, has made an education agreement with communist China, where Brazilian schools will follow the Chinese educational model.
And if Dilma Rousseff actually is elected on October 3, Brazil will keep suffering criminalizations, including of homeschooling. Anyway, she will be only obeying the Constitution…
In his 2 presidential terms, President Lula has put his administration machinery into action to work the decriminalization of abortion and the criminalization “homophobia”, even calling opposition to sodomy a “perverse disease”.
Nevertheless, he has enjoyed a very high popularity. The same Brazilian population that mostly disapproves abortion and is 99% “homophobic” (according to a poll conducted by a Brazilian institute connected to Lula’s party) gives Lula an approving rate of over 80%.
Late 2009, Lula changed the constitution to force four-year-old children to attend a school. But who cared?
TV channels were silent before this authority grab against the Brazilian family. Because they received in 2009 over 1 billion Real (almost 500,000 dollars) from the federal government to broadcast government propaganda, the Brazilian media kindly criticizes Lula and more kindly praises him. Red dictatorships in the past used to close down discordant media; Marxist Lula gratifies them.
So his presidential candidate is a direct beneficiary of his high popularity. And even though Lula is a friend of Fidel Castro, Hugo Chavez and Mahmud Ahmadinejad, his probable successor is more radical.
What are her qualifications for ruling Brazil?
Profession: Unknown
Activities:
1967 - agent for the Worker’s Politics Movement
06/10/68 - robbery of Banespa bank, Iguatemi Street, $ 80,000
12/10/68 - planned the murder of [American] Capt. Charles Chandler [accomplished in cold blood, in front of his house, his wife and child]
11/12/68 - robbery of Gun Store Diana, Seminario Street, 48 guns [stolen].
??/04/69 - National Liberation Command [another terrorist organization].
24/01/69 - Robbery of Quitauna Arms Depository - 63 FAU rifles, 3 INA guns, 4 munitions.
18/07/69 - Robbery of the Governor Ademar de Barros’ house [the money was never recovered].
01/08/68 - Robbery of the Mercantil of Sao Paulo bank.
??/09/69 - VAR Palmares [terrorist organization] Congress in Teresopolis.
20/09/69 - Robbery of the Public Force Police Quarters in Barro Branco.
Daughter of a Bulgarian Communist, Rousseff has no concern about her dark past, because Marxists have twisted in such a manner Brazilian policies that today, while communists and their families are given multimillion dollar reparations at the expense of the Brazilian taxpayers, victims of the communist terrorism and their families are ignored and poorly compensated, even in cases where people were murdered or left mutilated by bombs and guns.
The past criminals are the modern wealthy heroes.
Rousseff has a so radical record that any political creature resembling Al Gore running for president in Brazil would be easily mistaken as a right-wing candidate and fundamentalist Christian!
In fact, the only evangelical presidential candidate is a radical adherent of the Marxist Liberation Theology. She was a long time member of Lula’s Party, and her only reason to leave it was that instead of her, Dilma was chosen as presidential candidate. Today, she is a Green Party member.
All the other candidates are similarly Marxists and no of them are expected to change de Socialist provision in the Brazilian Constitution mandating school institutionalization for all children.
Christian churches and leaders could make a difference and save Brazil from such Marxist disaster. But the Socialist spell on the Brazilian media is on many churches. While most Catholic bishops are plagued by the Marxist Liberation Theology, a Protestant version has infected many traditional Protestant churches, and now even some Pentecostal churches are in the Marxist bandwagon.
The evangelical coordinator for the Dilma campaign is Bishop Manoel Ferreira, whose task is to draw evangelical churches and flocks and leaders to the Dilma fold. He is the president of the second largest Assembly of God denomination in Brazil.
The official policies of the Workers’ Party (believe it or not, no relation to the National Socialist German Workers’ Party, better known as Nazi Party, which also banned homeschooling in Germany in the 1930s) have clear pro-abortion and pro-sodomy provisions, but Dilma’s political propaganda avoids these “controversial” issues. Yet, her political friendships show her values. Last year she visited Spanish Prime Minister José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero, from the Marxist Spanish Workers’ Party. Zapatero has been famous and infamous for imposing abortion and anti-“homophobia” punishments in Spain.
Under Lula, Veja magazine (the Brazilian counterpart of Time magazine) charged that Brazilian school system was plagued by Marxist indoctrination. What hope is left for us Christians that believe that the State has no right to replace God?
Lula has been praising Dilma Rousseff. Hugo Chavez said that she is his candidate.
What about Obama? He has also welcomed her in the White House, which apparently sees no problem in the radical Marxist advance in Brazil. (Is he from the Workers’ Party too?)
Well, as a radical Socialist clone of Lula, Rousseff is in perfect peace with Fidel Castro, Hugo Chavez and Mahmud Ahmadinejad. And, of course, Obama is in peace with her.
Today the Brazilian cultural environment is much like to the US, but without any significant and large conservative opposition. Whereas Obama faces a lot of opposition from conservative Christian groups and leaders, Brazilian president Lula faces nothing of this sort. And his probable successor will enjoy his success too, because with all children under forced state indoctrination and media and churches under powerful financial spells, control is something very easy.
In this dark (oops, red) Brazilian picture, homeschooling is the only option for Christian churches and families to save their children, even though the cost is an illegal, underground lifestyle.
Roman Empire had its emperors that saw themselves as gods. In Brazil, god is the Socialist State. And this red god wants all the Brazilian children under its sacred “educational” control.
When my pregnant wife and I were reported because of homeschooling and child vaccination in Brazil, local government officials told us, “You can decide whatever you want about your children, but the ultimate decision belongs to the government”. Today, we are away from Brazil.
In the most important homeschooling case in Brazil, where the defendant was an Attorney General himself, the Higher Court of Justice ruled in 2002 that “children do not belong to their parents”.
These poor “children that do not belong to their parents” are being indoctrinated today to become in the future the Marxist doctors, teachers, politicians, governors and even Christian leaders. This is a dreadful prospect for the educationally-choiceless children in Brazil.
Brazilian law is very rarely enforced to punish political socialist abuses and power grab — and nowadays it is hindered from being enforced against Marxist terrorists —, but it has been steadily enforced to punish parents that think that they are free to educate their children away from the state model.
In a time of prevailing Marxism in the Brazilian culture, homeschooling is the only way for Brazilian parents to protect their children from the pervasive educational control of the state Moloch.
If the early persecuted Roman Christians could worship Jesus in the catacombs, why cannot Brazilian Christians educate their children for Jesus there?

Monday, July 19, 2010

Brazilian President Seeks to Outlaw Spanking

Brazilian President Seeks to Outlaw Spanking

By Matthew Cullinan Hoffman, Latin America Correspondent
BRASILIA, July 16, 2010 (LifeSiteNews.com) - Brazil's socialist President Luiz Lula da Silva is proposing changes to the nation's Children and Adolescents Statute that will prohibit parents from spanking their children or applying any other form of corporal punishment.
In accordance with the proposed law, parents caught spanking or pinching their children, after a warning, could be required to receive psychological treatment. The case could also be turned over to child protective services, according to the AP.
"The proposed definition is applicable not only in the domestic sphere, but also for the other caretakers of children and adolescents - in schools, shelters, prisons.  The bill is seeking a cultural change," said Carmen Oliveira, National Subsecretary for the Promotion of the Rights of Children and Adolescents.
"If punishment and whipping resolve the problem, the people wouldn't have corruption in the country.  There wouldn't be so much crime in the country," Lula claimed in his comments on the bill.
However, Antonio Carlos Gomes da Costa, who was one of the authors of the original Children and Adolescents Statute, disagrees.
"I would say that spanking, if it is applied with judgment and moderation, is not a violation of human rights," he said in a recent interview. "For example, a child insists in putting her finger into the light socket, and her father tells her it is dangerous, that she can't, and she nonetheless insists, to give her a little spank or a strong verbal scolding, which I find to be preferable, is not 'destructive.' Punishment is necessary."
In order to act against parents who use corporal punishment on their children, the government will need at least one third party witness, such as another family member, or a fellow worker in a daycare center.
Lula's anti-spanking initiative is only one in along line of anti-family policies, which include attempts to further depenalize abortion, to censor TV to prohibit condemnation of sodomy, and to push the homosexual agenda within international institutions.
Related LifeSiteNews coverage:
Brazilian Government Seeks to Remove "Homophobic" Christian Programming from Daytime TV
http://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/2009/may/09051502. html
Brazilian President Will Seek to "Criminalize Words and Acts Offensive to Homosexuality"
http://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/2009/apr/09043008.h tml
Brazilian President Luiz Lula Defends Abortion, Gay Unions
http://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/2008/sep/08091815.h tml
Organization of American States Approves Homosexual "Human Rights" Resolution
http://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/2008/jun/08061201.h tml
For many other articles on Brazil, see: http://lastdayswatchman.blogspot.com

Tuesday, June 15, 2010

Swine flu: Who paid the cost for the ghost pandemic?

Swine flu: Who paid the cost for the ghost pandemic?

By Julio Severo 
During many months I have been following the international news services and, by reading several secular U.S. and English newspapers, a fact was clear: the pandemic swine flu was shrouded in serious ethical and medical problems, including vaccinated youths’ deaths. And now we have the news that the vaccination was unnecessary. 
The English newspaper Daily Mail denounced in headline “The pandemic that never was: Drug firms ‘encouraged world health body to exaggerate swine flu threat’”. Then the article says, “Declaring a swine flu pandemic was a 'monumental error', driven by profit-hungry drug companies spreading fear, an influential report has concluded.” The full article is here
There is also the article “O conto da vacina suína” (the swine vaccine fable), published by the liberal Brazilian newspaper Folha de S. Paulo, which exposes scandals involving the Ministry of Health in Brazil and the World Health Organization (WHO), and the dishonest way how WHO changed the definition of pandemic exclusively to fatten pharmaceutical companies, which profited some 10 billion dollars with the ghost pandemic in 2009. 
That is same WHO that also changed the real meaning of homosexuality in the 1990s, removing it from the list of perverted behaviors, in order to serve the interests of multimillionaires lobbies. 
When defining what is and what is not, money, pressure and greed are a powerful persuasion. Under that persuasion, perverted behaviors get normalized, and what is not a pandemic becomes a pandemic!
In the ghost pandemic issue, what a lot of people suspected is now coming to light, and it is no wonder that the number of those vaccinated has not been high in the US and England, leaving enormous stagnant and non-used stocks of the useless vaccine that cost millions of dollars that could have been better invested in the population well-being. 
Even so, the pharmaceutical companies continue in their crazy race to sell their vaccines to countries foolish enough to buy the story of the pandemic. 
I could have informed the Brazilian public much earlier, but Blog Julio Severo (the Portuguese version of Last Days Watchman) has been for years showing the obvious: The socialist Lula administration doesn’t deserve trust. Would you trust a government that supports abortion, which is the cowardly killing of the most vulnerable and defenseless human beings? 
The big responsible for the vaccination effort in Brazil was the minister against health, José Temporão, an abortion supporter. He sees abortion merely as a “public-health issue”, so if pharmaceutical companies create a vaccine to eliminate this health “problem”, the maniac for mass vaccination campaigns will be greatly happy to make one partnership else with them.
Nevertheless, the Brazilian population thought that they could trust the would-be butcher. They got vaccinated. The obedience — or should I say foolishness? — was so big that the country that became world champion in vaccination against the inexistent and unreal swine flu pandemic was Brazil. More than 70 million Brazilians were vaccinated. 
Now, the Lula administration is smiling. The minister against health is smiling. Pharmaceutical companies, with their pockets full of the money from Brazilian citizens, are more than happy and leaping for joy. And the Brazilian people are smiling, without at least perceiving what is happening. They pay, via taxes, with the money of their own pockets the government’s foolishnesses, and they smile idiotically. 
And ultimately it is the government that gets the prize. In 2009, Lula received the Chatham House Prize for “for being a key driver of stability and integration in Latin America”. One of the chief sponsors of that international prize was the pharmaceutical company GlaxoSmithKline. In the late 2009, GlaxoSmithKline received R$ 465.532.000,00 (more than 200 million dollars) from the Brazilian government, in a purchase without public tender, of doses of the vaccine against the swine flu “pandemic”. 
One good turn deserves another. Pharmaceutical companies sponsor international tributes to Lula’s uncontrollable and insatiable ego, and Lula satisfies the uncontrollable and insatiable greed of those companies by sustaining ghost pandemics that fill their safes. 
But the high cost was really paid by the vaccinated Brazilians. See some repercussions of the vaccine in the Brazilian media: 
So government and pharmaceutical companies take your money, go on a spree and, to justify so much unbridled spending, in the end you and your family have to submit to the shot prickle and all its consequences. 
A country like this is a perfect corral to feed the greed of the powerful and corrupt, which would go through any artifice to stop anything hindering their profits. 
During the 2008 Brazilian mass vaccination campaign against rubella, denunciations by Blog Julio Severo (the Portuguese version of Last Days Watchman) drew not only the attention from the liberal media (see article in the major Brazilian newspaper O Dia blaming me for the low vaccination numbers), but also the anger from the Brazilian federal Ministry of Health, which counted on a team of internet professionals to sabotage my articles on the vaccination campaign. The goal was to post texts and comments wherever my texts had been published, questioning them, breaking their force and destroying my credibility. A guerrilla work. I eventually learnt about this because a woman connected to the team talked to her friend, which in turn is my friend!
It was a significant coincidence, which exposed that there were bigwigs interested in sabotaging the impact of my articles on the vaccination campaign. According to the information I received, the Ministry of Health was also planning other actions against me, including legal, but I suppose that there was not time to implement them, because in few weeks I left Brazil. That is the cost you pay for warning people. 
Therefore, next time that the government and liberal media appear with a scaremongering campaign trying to convince you of another ghost pandemic, distrust. 
How not to distrust a government that is interested only in what is in your pocket?
What is behind the campaign “Brazil Free of Rubella”?

Monday, June 14, 2010

Lula’s foolishness is joke in Israel

Lula’s foolishness is joke in Israel 

By Julio Severo 
In Brazil, when we look at Lula, we don’t know whether to laugh or cry. If his foolishness, which competes with the vast territorial size of Brazil, didn’t produce such devastating results, we would only laugh at a great and arrogant blunderer. 
However, his messes have been producing results. To protect the Iranian nuclear program, Lula made a deal between Brazil, Iran and Turkey. See here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mPxYGiUXb-Q
That program is entirely in the man’s hands that says openly that he wants to sweep Israel from the face of the earth. 
How did Brazil come to the point of having in the presidency a foolish man allied to the atomic pervert of Iran? 
To avoid crying, Israel made a joke of that foolishness of the president that embarrasses Brazil. See the comedy in this link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m6nXfX22fOc



Seeing the Israeli comedy on Lula, you feel like laughing. 
However, seeing Lula in the reality, you feel like crying, because the messes that he makes are not jokes nor fiction. 
Portuguese version of this article: Falta de juízo de Lula vira piada em Israel
Lula humiliates Israel

Thursday, June 10, 2010

LifeSiteNews in Portuguese Reaches First Birthday

LifeSiteNews in Portuguese Reaches First Birthday

By Matthew Cullinan Hoffman, Latin America Correspondent
MEXICO CITY, June 3, 2010 (LifeSiteNews.com) — Notícias Pró-Família (Pro-Family News), LifeSiteNews.com’s service in Portuguese, has completed its first year of service, with over 42,000 page views and wide republishing of its articles in the Portuguese-speaking blogosphere.
Although the first articles published on the site are dated from early April of 2009, they were posted in late May, with backdating to reflect the date of their authorship.
Pro-life and pro-family activist Julio Severo provides the translations to the site, and says that it has made a difference in the debate over life and family issues in Brazil, a country whose liberal president has promoted the depenalization of abortion, as well as special rights and even media censorship in favor of the homosexualist cause,
“Through its Portuguese version, Notícias Pró-Família, LSN show that the threats Brazilians are facing are already reality in the US, Canada and Europe,” said Severo, commenting on the site’s impact. “So LSN articles are uniquely equipped to inform and prepare Brazilians concerned about family issues to confront the cultural war.”
He also notes that “Notícias Pró-Família has had a special role in special battles. In the known case of the nine-year-old Brazilian girl, whose twins were aborted and whose abortion was opposed by Brazilian archbishop Sobrinho Cardoso and supported by archbishop Fisichella, Brazilians learned the international impact of this pro-life battle. And they learned who did right and who did wrong. No media in Brazil, secular or otherwise, reported more on this case than Notícias Pró-Família.”
Following the coverage, Notícias Pró-Família was given the Blog Apostolado da Vida (Apostolate of Life Blog) award by the Brazilian organization Pró-Vida de Anápolis, which is one of the most influential pro-life and pro-family organizations at the national level in Brazil.
Since it began posting translations of LSN articles last year on Google’s Blogger hosting service, over 150 bloggers have become members of the site, and the translations are widely reproduced in the Brazilian blogosphere.
LSN hopes in the future to add a site with Spanish translations of its articles, and eventually original Portuguese and Spanish-language reporting for readers of those languages.
Related Links:                                   
Notícias Pró-Família (Pro-Family News — LifeSiteNews in Portuguese)
http://noticiasprofamilia.blogspot.com/
Source: http://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/2010/jun/10060314.html

Monday, June 07, 2010

Flotilla of the disguised peace receives forceful defense of Turkey

Flotilla of the disguised peace receives forceful defense of Turkey 

By Julio Severo 
Turkish government is mobilizing to have Israeli authorities judged by the International Criminal Court in The Hague, Netherlands, because Israel “dared” to inspect “humanitarian” ships destined to Palestinian Arabs. The ships, coming from Turkey, also contained hidden weapons. 
After all, how will Palestinian Arabs be able to continue their attacks against Israel without the “humanitarian” help of weapons?  
Turkey, a mostly Muslim nation that has a long history of shedding of Christian blood, got hysterical about the actions of Israel, which exposed the disguised humanitarianism. The “pacifists” faced the Israeli military inspectors with extreme violence. And they received the due treatment and answer. 
Since when are weapons for use against Israeli citizens “humanitarian” help? If, in a daring opposed scenery, a flotilla with similar “help” were destined to the Kurdish separatist minority in Turkey, would Turks react with delicacy? In fact, the same Turkey that demands from Israel a state for Palestinian Arabs also persecutes the Kurdish minority in Turkey, because they want a state! The kind Turks are determined to extinguish the Kurdish wish.
For Turks, there can be persecution and blood-shedding at will, provided it is not against their chosen Muslim faith. That is why Turkey condemns UN attempts of condemning Sudan, whose Muslim government murdered about half a million of Sudaneses that were not Muslim. Most of those massacred were Christian. 
In the UN Security Council — where for decades Israel has been systematically condemned by pressure from Islamic nations —, Sudan has been protected from condemnation. Even if six million Jews were being murdered today, by sheer ideological pressure UN would eventually manage to condemn Israel and clear Sudan.
Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdog said: “It’s not possible for a Muslim to commit genocide. That’s why we are comfortable [with the Islamic president's visit of Sudan to Turkey].”
Turkey has no reason to admit and oppose genocides committed by Muslims. Immediately before the World War 1, the Islamic government in Turkey murdered hundreds of thousands of Christian Armenian men, women and children in cold blood. Until today, Turkey doesn’t tolerate when somebody says that that massacre of innocents was genocide. 
Turkey speaks from the position of one that committed genocide and of one that today defends the genocidal Islamic government in Sudan. 
Israel answers from the position of one that suffered the genocide of more than 6 million Jews during the World War 2. With that tragic experience, Israel can never treat carelessly the defense of her families, even when a weapons cargo is disguised in “innocent” ships of leftist peace activists bringing candies and medicines.
As to the International Criminal Court, what about Turkey and Sudan giving an account of their atrocities against innocent populations?

Thursday, May 20, 2010

The folly of man’s planning

The folly of man’s planning 

By Julio Severo 
Modern Christian families have usually 2 children. Single women with three or four children fathered by different men are not a rare sight, at least not in Brazil. An unmarried man with several children by several women is a growing modern reality. That is the horrendous legacy of family planning. 
The preaching of family planning, initiated by lesbian theosophist Annie Besant in the predominantly Protestant England in the 19th century, achieved its objective: today’s England is much less Christian, and men and women are much less prone to get married. Of those getting married, the pattern is two children at the most. 
Margaret Sanger, inventor of the term “birth control” in the early 20th century, used to say that birth control would eventually destroy Christianity. Looking at England, nobody could doubt Sanger, founder of the International Planned Parenthood Federation, which is today the largest abortion organization in the world. 
As in England, the family-planning fever, launched by New Age leaders, spread as fire throughout Protestant nations. Next, ideas of racial purification (eugenics) and population control came in the same trail. German Nazis and the Soviet communists benefitted a lot from those ideas. 
If the goal of the population-control agenda was to indoctrinate families to have two children, the success was total, at least in Europe and in the US. But in the trail a shady picture appeared. 
With the divorce of sex from procreation, marriage came under contempt. With marriage despised, sexual freedom came, where a man is free to make sex to whoever he wants, with no marital responsibility. The result, as we have seen, is many and increasing cases of single women having several children fathered by different men. And equally bizarre cases of men that, as perverted hummingbirds pollinating throughout their world, live their lives impregnating a woman after another. 
I met a man that, when young and without God, lived unconcerned about marriage, just getting busy with pleasures, which yielded to him eight children by eight different women. Later, he accepted Jesus and became a minister. 
But there are cases of much younger men that may also brag that they have eight or more children with different women. These children, with several siblings, will never have a normal father’s love, while their fathers continue their insane contests for new women to impregnate.
At the end, a gigantic mass of illegitimate unborn babies, by different fathers and mothers, are aborted or get permission to be born. And the statistics for children born outside marriage and natural family are not beautiful: 70% delinquents come from these irresponsible relationships.
In past times, it took a lifetime for a depraved man to impregnate several women. Today, with sex much easier and free, young men can impregnate a variety of women in a shorter time, and the results are always several abortions or illegitimate children.
Instead of correcting the problem by valuing natural family and establishing punishments for irresponsible conducts, social engineers prefer to redefine family, removing its original sense of “father and mother married with children beget by them” to benefit any deformed grouping, regardless of marriage, composed of:  
* A cohabiting man and woman bringing up children from previous relationships. 
* A divorced man with a divorced woman bringing up children from previous marriages. 
* A man with another man bringing up children fathered by other people. 
Those deformed groups, which are extremely problematic, are included as “family” in sick cultures, and it is no wonder that governments say that “family” has “problems”. Probably, governments want intentionally the classification of those deformed groups as “family” in order to have full powers and excuses to interfere, mutilate, traumatize, damage, deform and destroy the power of the natural family. 
Instead of promoting the growth of the natural family, malicious and opportunistic governments promote the growth of deformed groups and their valorization as “family”. Instead of valuing an increase in births in natural families, irresponsible governments, with their population-control doctrine, eventually promote explosion of abortions and illegitimate births. 
The family-planning doctrine was able to reduce drastically the number of marriages in the Western nations. It was also able to reduce drastically the number of children in the increasingly fewer formal marriages today. But in the process it provoked the disarray of sexual relationships and unrestrained procreation by men and women that want nothing to do with marriage. 
The population-control doctrine, which is reducing marriages and families, is provoking an unprecedented explosion of fatherless and family-less children. As the number of marriages decreases, the number of illegitimate babies increases continuously.  
The abundant access to legal abortion in the Western nations has, for the time being, been able to varnish the enormity of their demographic woes, because a lot of women that were supposed to be with 8 or more children by different men are single and childless, continuing “normally” their careers and active sexual lives. The cost of the sexual freedom is an immense blood shedding that is impossible to measure. 
To men that don’t want to impregnate woman after woman, the only option left is anal (homosexual) sex and become other piece in the population-control game to destroy natural marriage, contributing for many of the gay demands for the disfigurement of the natural family. 
Sex, any sex, is promoted today, provided that it mutilates, traumatizes, damages, deforms or even destroys children, values, Christianity, marriage and family. It is not without purpose that the International Planned Parenthood Federation is engaged in the promotion of abortion, homosexuality, feminism and sexual education in the schools. 
The consequences are already here. And in the next decades, more consequences will come. Because of the reduced number of children, Europe is in process of being dominated by large Muslim families. But the European leaders’ most urgent questions in the next years are: with a population of young workers more and more reduced, how to support social security? What to do with the enormous number of seniors increasing continuously? Netherlands, formerly a strong Protestant nation, has given the official answer: euthanasia.
Netherlands, religiously faithful to the population-control doctrine, has been pioneering in homosexual “marriage”, children’s adoption by gay couples, legal acceptance of marijuana and other drugs, etc. Besides euthanasia, Netherlands has been exporting abortion to other nations, through her infamous abortion boat. And for the sake of diversity and demoncracy, Netherlands has the dishonor of having the first pedophilic party in the world, composed mostly of homosexual pedophiles.
Netherlands and other modern nations reflect the fulfillment of Margaret Sanger’s wish: birth control destroys Christian churches and their influence on society
That is the cost of the acceptance of the man’s planning. That is the cost of the rejection of the planning of God. 
To marry and have several children inside of marriage is folly, fools in this world say. But this is the “foolishness” of God. Not to marry and fill the earth with children’s blood or fill it with traumatized children without a father, without a family and without a moral direction: that is the man’s foolishness without God. That is the legacy of family planning.
Portuguese version of this article: A loucura do planejamento do homem

Tuesday, May 18, 2010

Leader of Brazil's Homosexual Movement Admits Existence of Ex-Gays

Leader of Brazil's Homosexual Movement Admits Existence of Ex-Gays

Says, "we need you heterosexuals, we love you so that you may reproduce children to become homosexuals"

By Matthew Cullinan Hoffman, Latin America Correspondent
BRAZIL, May 12, 2010 (LifeSiteNews.com) - Luiz Mott, the undisputed leader of Brazil's homosexual movement, has admitted on national television that no one is born homosexual, and that people can change their sexual orientations.
In a recent appearance on the highly popular late night talk show "Programa do Jô" aired on Brazil's Globo network, Mott told the host that he is a "former heterosexual."
"I am an ex-heterosexual in the same way that there are ex-gays, people that were not 100% homosexual," said Mott.  "They had some experiences, did not like them and then joined the other side."
Although Mott attributed change to people who were "not 100% homosexual," he made it clear to host Jô Soares that he believes that "all human beings have, as Freud said it, a bisexual desire," and that sexual preference is something fluid and changeable.
"Fortunately human sexuality is cultural and constructed and can change. I think I am not going to change anymore because I am very much accustomed and happy," he told Soares.
"Usually I say, we need you heterosexuals, we love you so that you may reproduce children to become homosexuals...new gays and new lesbians," added Mott during the interview, which was broadcast on April 24.
As LifeSiteNews has noted in past articles Mott is also known for his open sexual attraction to adolescents, and regards restrictions on sex with minors to be based on "prejudice."
Related links:
Full Interview with Mott on Programa do Jô (Portuguese)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v8LvDghc30k&feature=related
Excerpts of interview translated into English by Julio Severo
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x7G3GYfYV3Y