“Palestinian Messengers”: How Christ and Christians Are Used for the Palestinian Cause

By Julio Severo

Last Christmas, Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas said Jesus was a “Palestinian” messenger.

Even though Jesus was never a Palestinian or an advocate of a Palestinian cause, Abbas and his Muslim colleagues want to use Him to “ecumenically” unify Christians and Muslims to secure their cause.

Christ has never been a Palestinian messenger, but there has been a number of Christian individuals and groups associating themselves with a Palestinian message. Knowingly or not, they have been used as Palestinian messengers.

WCC and Liberation Theology

The most notorious group is the World Council of Churches (WCC), which espouses Liberation Theology, which “portrays Israel as the colonial oppressor and the Palestinians as the victim of imperialism.” Its ecumenical meeting in Brazil in 2006 “ecumenically” gathered together gay, witchcraft and Palestinian activists.

Ecumencial WCC meeting in Brazil in 2006: witches with gay activists

Rev. Walter Altmann, the Moderator of the WCC Central Committee, is an example of the WCC radicalism. He said, “A particular interest of mine has been to seek convergences between the theology of the Reformation and liberation theology.”

Rev. Walter Altmann at WCC

Altmann, a Brazilian, is former president of the Evangelical Church of the Lutheran Confession in Brazil, the biggest Lutheran synod in Brazil (700,000 members). Though significant, its numbers pale in comparison to other groups in the Brazilian evangelical world. According to “The New International Dictionary of Pentecostal and Charismatic Movements: Revised and Expanded Edition” (Zondervan 2010), Pentecostals and neo-Pentecostals account for more than 45,000,000 members in Brazil.

Ecumencial WCC meeting in Brazil in 2006: Palestinian banners

Altmann’s Lutheran Church is mostly ecumenical, pro-Palestine, anti-Israel and liberal. In 2006, its most prominent seminary had Luiz Mott, the father of the homosexual movement in Brazil, as a main speaker. In stark contrast, Brazilian Pentecostal and neo-Pentecostal churches, staunchly pro-Israel and generally anti-ecumenical, have been at risk of being defiled by the theological influence of Protestant denominations which promote Liberation Theology, as exposed in my e-book “Theology of Liberation versus Theology of Prosperity,” available free of charge here: http://bit.ly/15AJmMC

Prominent gay activist Luiz Mott in the largest Lutheran theological seminary in Brazil

In a WCC interview, Altmann noted “the growth of Pentecostal churches” and lamented that “many of the new churches reject ecumenism and campaign against it.” Ecumenism, which goes hand in hand with the Palestinian cause, has been supported by the political and theological Left. WCC and its ecumenism have depended primarily on money from the decaying and leftist old-line Protestant denominations of North America and Western Europe.

Altmann celebrated that Liberation Theology had strongly influenced the ecumenical movement and the WCC during the 1970s and 1980s.

In Brazil, Pentecostalism and orthodox Roman Catholicism are hostile to Liberation Theology, ecumenism and the Palestinian cause. In contrast, old mainline Protestant denominations, like the Lutheran Church in Brazil, which was headed by Rev. Altmann, embrace Liberation Theology, Palestinian activism and leftist political involvement.

When Cuban tyrant Fidel Castro hailed Jesus as a “great social revolutionary” to Altmann in 1999, the Lutheran minister, who had several dinners with Castro, saw no problem. Why, then, would the WCC see any problem with Abbas saying that Jesus was a “Palestinian messenger”?

Under ecumenism, it is very easy to accept Jesus as a “great social revolutionary” or “Palestinian messenger.”

Bethlehem Bible College and “Christ at the CheckPoint”

Under ecumenism, Christian-Muslim efforts have been developed by the World Council of Churches, the Vatican and the World Evangelical Alliance (WEA), as noted by the “WEA Theological News” (October 2012 Vol 41 No 4). Some of these efforts involve Palestinian Protestants who are adherents of Palestinian Liberation Theology.

Under the headline “Promoting Biblical Truth by Networking Theologians,” “WEA Theological News” highlights Bethlehem Bible College and its founder and president, Bishara Awad, in a very positive light, for propaganda purposes.

Bethlehem Bible College hosts the “Christ at the CheckPoint” conferences, partly to advance Christian-Muslim relations. Many of its speakers are prominent Western leftist Protestant leaders and Palestinian prelates adherent to Palestinian Liberation Theology.

In his article “Countering Anti-Israel Evangelism,” Mark Tooley writes:

“The last several years anti-Israel evangelicals have hosted a ‘Christ at the Checkpoint’ conference in Bethlehem featuring some prominent U.S. evangelicals. Last year's included evangelist Tony Campolo, a spiritual counselor to President Bill Clinton, and Florida mega church pastor Joel Hunter, a spiritual counselor to President Barack Obama. The next ‘Christ at the Checkpoint’ is March 2014 and will feature Geoff Tunnicliffe, head of the World Evangelical Alliance. There will also be a Dallas Southern Baptist pastor, despite his denomination's strong support for Israel. Additionally speaking is Gary Burge of Wheaton College, himself a prominent author critical of Israel who teaches at America’s most prestigious evangelical college. Anti-Israel sentiment among evangelical elites is strongest in academia and in international relief and missions groups.”

Bishara Awad, founder of the Bethlehem Bible College

British writer Paul Wilkinson, who attended it as an observer, noted:

“That movement has developed a staggering, frightening pace in recent years. I was in Bethlehem March 2012, at an evangelical conference called the Christ at the Checkpoint Conference. Over 700 evangelicals, all the names I’ve mentioned already, Gary Burge [and] Stephen Sizer were there; there was Joel Hunter, who’s one of the spiritual advisors to Barack Obama; Tony Campolo, the chairman of the World Evangelical Alliance was there, the head of the Lausanne Movement was there, all giving support to the Palestinians, all condemning the Israeli occupation.”

Another World Evangelical Alliance leader involved in “Christ at the Checkpoint” is Thomas Schirrmacher, who was a speaker at this conference in 2012. Schirrmacher rejects the charge that “Christ at the Checkpoint” is anti-Israel. Instead, he argues, it is about “reconciliation.”

Messianic Jews Reject “Christ at the Checkpoint”

His view is a far cry from the official view of conservative Jews. Leaders of the Messianic Jewish Alliance of America, Union of Messianic Jewish Congregations, International Messianic Jewish Alliance and the International Alliance of Messianic Congregations and Synagogues, representing the mainstream Messianic Jewish movement, issued a joint statement prior to the 2012 Christ at the Checkpoint conference. They declared the following, “The conference claims to seek peace and reconciliation, but reflects biblical interpretations that deny the ongoing validity of God’s covenants with the Jewish people… We recognize and are deeply concerned with the struggle of Palestinian Christians. What we object to is a conference that is explicitly pro-Palestinian and anti-Israel, which seeks to promote itself as a conference on peace and reconciliation.”

Their statement also said:

“The Messianic Jewish community worldwide, standing in the place of our forefathers Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, and the prophets and apostles who authored the Scriptures, view the modern re-emergence of supersessionism/replacement theology as a serious theological error, which has fueled anti-Semitism throughout history. It needs to be exposed and rejected by Christians worldwide. This theology, if left unchallenged, will eventually result in the continued suffering and persecution of our Jewish people, whether inside or outside Israel. Any effort for peace and reconciliation between Jews and Gentiles, even within the Yeshua-believing community, must recognize that the gifts and calling of God toward our Jewish people are irrevocable and still in effect today.”

Stephen Sizer: Churches that Side with Israel Are an “Abomination”

Even though Schirrmacher chose not to listen to these conservative Jews, there were other red flags. The Jerusalem Post reported: “Among the speakers was Rev. Stephen Sizer, a British minister who has spoken out harshly against Israel and met with radical Muslims, including Hezbollah.” Sizer is not alone in championing the cause of Palestinian liberation theology throughout the Muslim world. Two of his closest friends and colleagues within the anti-Israel ecumenical movement are Gary Burge and Donald Wagner, one of whom was also a speaker at “Christ at the CheckPoint.” Burge and Wagner are ordained ministers within the Presbyterian Church (USA), the world’s biggest pro-abortion and pro-homosexuality Presbyterian denomination, which has called for boycotts against Israel. They have been very active in the ecumenical Evangelical Christian-Muslim Dialogue.

Yasser Arafat and Stephen Sizer

In his personal blog, Sizer signed and published a document entitled “Joint Declaration by Christian Leaders on Israel’s 60th Anniversary.” The declaration decries the situation of Palestinians, then appeals to a kind of reconciliation:

“Let us commit ourselves in prophetic word and practical deed to a courageous settlement whose details will honour both peoples’ shared love for the land, and protect the individual and collective rights of Jews and Palestinians in the Holy Land.”

The original, supreme Declaration on Israel, the Bible, makes no provision for joint possession of the Holy Land by Jews and Romans, Jews and Canaanites, Jews and Palestinians, etc. Such joint possession violates the original and only intent of Israel’s Creator. On the contrary, His promises for Israel throughout the Bible, even in the New Testament, have no room for a joint venture between Jews and Palestinian-Arab-Muslims or Liberation Theology Christians.

Even so, Sizer’s Declaration was signed by many Calvinists and other traditional Protestants, including Geoff Tunnicliffe, General Secretary of World Evangelical Alliance. Although the Declaration and Sizer seem to defend “reconciliation,” there other motivations. The Rosh Pina Project said, “If you are a Messianic Jew or Israeli Arab Christian who support the government of Israel, which is inherently Zionist by its very history and nature,” Sizer says:

“There are certainly churches in Israel/Palestine that side with the occupation, that side with Zionism. One of my burdens is to challenge them theologically and show that they’ve repudiated Jesus, they’ve repudiated the Bible, and they are an abomination.”

According to the Rosh Pina Project, in a November 2013 telephone debate between Messianic Jewish scholar Michael Brown, who is an American Pentecostal leader, and Stephen Sizer hosted by Moody Radio asking if Christian Zionism is Christian, Brown at 50:20 minutes challenges Sizer about claiming Jewish and Arab Israeli followers of Jesus who support their nation, Israel, are an abomination. Initially Sizer flat-out denies he even said it. Brown provides the quote that the Rosh Pina Project broke in 2011, Sizer accepts he said it, but he added that he was “comfortable” with it being a true quote.

Is Thomas Schirrmacher “comfortable” with this liberal gang? Schirrmacher is a Calvinist and director of the Martin Bucer Theological Seminary in Europe. Yet, just because Burge and Wagner are also Calvinists, should he close his eyes to be with them as a speaker in a Palestinian event dominated by Palestinian Theology Liberation adherents?

Walid Shoebat, Palestinian and Former Muslim Brotherhood Member

Palestinian Christian Walid Shoebat, in a piece in WorldNetDaily entitled “Evangelicals for Hamas,” has also denounced “Christ at the CheckPoint,” whose motto is “resistance against the Israeli Zionist occupation.” He has denounced specifically the relationship of this conference with Hamas. According to International Christian Concern (ICC), “Hamas, in association with the Muslim Brotherhood, is controlling the Gaza Strip by force of arms, and is cracking down on Christians and restricting their freedom of worship. It is also trying to force them to abandon Christianity and convert to Islam.” ICC also explains that “there are ongoing attacks on churches and Christians in the Gaza Strip because Hamas considers Christians ‘infidels.’”

According to Shoebat, a former Muslim Brotherhood member:

“Christians are declining in Palestinian controlled areas. Bethlehem was 80 percent Christian and today it is less then 1 percent. Yet Israel is blamed even though the decline has not affected Muslims, while the Christian population in Israel has not declined a single percentage point. The Christian emigration is a result of persecution by Muslim Hamas and the Palestinian Authority that began their program of intimidation and land grabs, including Christian centers that were turned into headquarters for terrorists and thugs. In Gaza, the only Christian bookstore was closed and its owner, Rami Ayyad, was shot in the head by a Hamas fanatic. The birthplace of Christ, Joseph’s Tomb, and Joshua’s grave were all desecrated by Muslim terrorists.”

Christians and even Muslims in Israel are not immigrating to “Palestine.” But, if given the opportunity, Christians (and even Muslims) in the lands occupied by the Palestinian Authority would immigrate to Israel.

Shoebat says:

“Historically and biblically, there was never a Palestinian civilization or culture. Yet this is the core of the Bethlehem Bible College doctrine. Palestinianism, including the twisted brand of Christianity it incorporates, is designed to eradicate the Jewish presence and nothing more. This theology supports a divided state solution for Israel and even supports recognition of the Hamas terrorist organization as the ‘legitimate representative of the Palestinian people.’ Hamas is a terrorist group which seeks the destruction of Israel. According to the United States government, Hamas is considered a terrorist group.”

Shoebat also explains what students are taught in Bethlehem Bible College, founded by Bishara Awad:

“So how does the Awads view Zionism? Yousef Ijha, a graduate from Bethlehem Bible College (Awad and Ijha can be seen [here]), presented his dissertation titled Study on Christian Zionism which was accepted for his graduation. He writes in his dissertation: ‘Herzl established the first Zionist Congress in 1897, and succeeded in gathering the Jews of the world around him including the shrewdest of Jews to issue forth the most dangerous plan in the history of the world The Protocols of the Elders of Zion derived from sacred Jewish teaching.’ All that, while ignoring that The Protocols of the Elders of Zion is a fraudulent document.”

Not only fraudulent, but probably the main tool used by the KGB to spread anti-Israel hatred in Muslim nations. According to Daily Mail:

“The Protocols book, Pacepa claims, became ‘the basis for much of Hitler’s anti-Semitic philosophy.’ The KGB, he writes, disseminated ‘thousands of copies’ in Muslim countries during the 1970s.”

“Christ at the CheckPoint” and Its Propaganda against the Israeli Wall

Obviously, its dissemination was not designed to bring “reconciliation” between Israel and Palestinians. So why did Bethlehem Bible College never repudiate it? In fact, why does Bethlehem Bible College portray the Israeli Wall, even in its “Christ at the CheckPoint” propaganda, as an “apartheid wall”?

A Gatestone Institute report demolishes the false propaganda by saying:

“In 2005, a young Palestinian woman called Wafa al-Biss was badly burned in a domestic fire, taken to Israel’s Soroka Hospital, and treated there for months. When discharged, she was given a permit to return as an out-patient. Some time later she headed for the hospital wearing a suicide belt with the aim of exploding it among the doctors and nurses who had treated her, as well as however many children she could find. She was caught at a checkpoint and imprisoned. Earlier this year she was released as part of a prisoner release agreement [under US pressure]. Within hours she was speaking to Palestinian children, urging them to put on suicide vests and kill as many Jews as possible. And some people wonder why the Israelis need a security barrier.”

The Gatestone Institute report also says:

“It is a lie to say that Israel is an apartheid state and that the wall is an apartheid wall. It is a security barrier, just like dozens of others around the world, none of which is ever called an ‘apartheid wall.’”

Yet, Bethlehem Bible College and its founder, Bishara Awad, insist on depicting the Israeli checkpoints, not the radical Muslim Palestinians, as the real problem.

Thomas Schirrmacher and Confusion in Brazil

If Thomas Schirrmacher believes that “reconciliation” is a key component of “Christ at the CheckPoint” conferences, and its efforts to overthrow the Israeli wall, how will he be able to counter the liberal, Marxist and anti-Israel orientations in the ecumenical movement? How will he be able to see anti-Israel feelings in Burge and Wagner, who were his comrades and speakers at “Christ at the CheckPoint”?

His personal website has an exclusive ecumenical page and has also a page devoted to “Christ at the CheckPoint,” and Paul Wilkinson, in his booklet “The Church at Christ’s CheckPoint,” exposes the true agenda behind this conference. He quotes Schirrmacher saying:

“The WEA [World Evangelical Alliance] is ‘willing to do everything,’ including co-operate with the Palestinian Authority.”

Schirrmacher is scheduled to be a main speaker in the first International Congress on Fundamental Civil Freedoms in Brazil. The congress will be held in March in Brasilia by ANAJURE. What will he bring to ANAJURE? More from his ecumenical experiences? Will these experiences include “reconciliation” efforts?

ANAJURE has had enough problems. In fact, the most important test for ANAJURE, founded in 2012, and its interest to defend fundamental civil freedoms was when Congressman Marco Feliciano, who is also a Pentecostal minister opposed to abortion and the gay agenda, was viciously attacked by the powerful Brazilian Left because he had been appointed to head the Human Rights Committee in the Brazilian Congress in March 2013. In a press release, the ANAJURE president did not defend him, but questioned his appointment and personal motivations. In an exclusive interview, Congressman Feliciano explained that he was betrayed by ANAJURE.

ANAJURE has had enough problems. Its event with Schirrmacher has been propagandized by Ultimato, an old Protestant Liberation Theology magazine founded by Presbyterians in Brazil. Its positions on Israel are similar to Sizer’s views, focusing on “reconciliation.”

How then would Schirrmacher’s “reconciliation” views help ANAJURE and Brazil? How would his pro-Palestinian-Arab-Muslim ecumenical experiences help ANAJURE and Brazil?

Brazil has had enough of pro-Palestinian-Arab-Muslim and anti-Israel sentiment in its socialist government and many of its Protestant leaders, including Walter Altmann.

I hope Schirrmacher’s participation in an ANAJURE congress will not undermine the important Pentecostal resistance to the leftist Protestants’ overture to Liberation Theology, including its Palestinian-Arab version, and to anti-Israel sentiment, allegedly in the name of “reconciliation.”

Schirrmacher has been involved in high-profile Christian-Muslim ecumenical efforts with the Vatican and the World Council of Churches. In fact, he has been a speaker at WCC events.

Under the banner of ecumenism, it is very easy to embrace replacement theology, which says that Israel was replaced by the Church and all God’s promises to the descendants of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob are now invalid for Israel. Some high-ranking Calvinist theologians in ANAJURE espouse this stance. These theologians are from the Mackenzie Presbyterian University. In fact, the main sponsor of the ANAJURE event is Mackenzie. You can learn more about this Calvinist university here and here and here.

Mainline Protestant churches and members are the main victims of ecumenism and its apostasies. In 2008, then US State Secretary Condoleezza Rice, the famous daughter of an American Presbyterian minister, visited Brazil. Her Israeli-Palestinian politics were guided by her Calvinist replacement theology. She came to Brazil to strengthen the roots of the Afro-Brazilian religions, which are considered “witchcraft” by the Bible.

Brazilian sorceress and Condoleezza Rice

There is no contradiction for Calvinist Rice and other liberal Protestants to strengthen witchcraft, gay activism and Palestine and, at the same time, to weaken Israel. WCC is just an example of such apostasy.

Ecumenism Fosters Palestinian Cause

Ecumenism has been a catalyst for the Palestinian cause. The Lutheran Church of Altmann and other mainline Protestant denominations played a major role in the “World Social Forum - Free Palestine” in 2012. This event, held in Brazil, was the world’s biggest pro-Palestine socialist event.

Palestinian Liberation Theology adherents and Latin American Liberation Theology Protestants and Catholics gathered together, in their common leftist faith, to advocate their common Palestinian cause.

In May 2013, Bishara Awad, the Palestinian activist behind “Christ at the CheckPoint,” visited Brazil and some of its churches. He was the main speaker at Open Doors and at a major ministers’ meeting, under the ecumenical cloak of “reconciliation.”

The Brazilian socialist government sees the socialist and Palestinian claims as legitimate, including any reference to Jesus as a “great social revolutionary” or “Palestinian” messenger. The “World Social Forum - Free Palestine” had the same view. Of course, Awad and his “Christ at the CheckPoint” colleagues just would agree too. As to Schirrmacher, does he see just “reconciliation” in all of this?

Excepting for Altmann and his mainline Protestant comrades (who have become socialist and Palestinian messengers), Brazilian evangelicals, who are mostly Pentecostals and neo-Pentecostals, have resisted the ecumenical efforts to align themselves with the socialist political view and the Liberation Theology view of Jesus being a “great social revolutionary” or “Palestinian” messenger.

I am indebted to three articles by Dr. Mark Tooley as sources for my article. I am indebted also to Paul Wilkinson, James Sundquist, Don Hank, Ingo Haake and to Walid Shoebat and their documentation.

Portuguese version of this article: “Mensageiros palestinos”: Como Cristo e os cristãos são usados para promover a causa palestina

Source: www.lastdayswatchman.blogspot.com

Recommended Reading:

Anti-Israel Activist Speaks at Open Doors Brazil

A Charismatic Response to “The Growing Crisis Behind Brazil’s Evangelical Success Story”

Brazil to Host World’s Biggest Pro-Palestine Event

Palestinian Gays Want World Boycotts against Israel

What every Christian should know about Israel

Pope Francis Named “Person of the Year” by World’s Biggest Gay Magazine

By Julio Severo

Praises keep knocking at the door of Pope Francis, who was named “Person of the Year” by The Advocate, the world’s biggest homosexual magazine.

It is the second tribute that the pope has received in a week. On December 11, he was named Time magazine’s “Person of the Year.”

In its headline, The Advocate highlighted Francis’ statement, made during a June interview: “If someone is gay and seeks the Lord with good will, who am I to judge?”

“Pope Francis’ stark change in rhetoric from his two predecessors... makes what he’s done in 2013 all the more daring,” The Advocate editors wrote, noting that both John Paul II and Benedict XVI had been listed among the magazine’s “Phobie Awards” for anti-gay stances during their papacies.

By “anti-gay stances,” The Advocate also sees the mere attitude of helping someone who does not want to be a homosexual any longer. Two years ago, this gay magazine criticized me for my stance of supporting Lisa Miller, a woman who was converted to Christ, left lesbianism and today is a runaway from the US “justice” system which wants to deliver up her biological daughter to her former lesbian partner, who has never been converted and is determined, even with no biological relation, to take Lisa’s daughter.

I was attacked just for defending a mother and her daughter.

Why then did The Advocate, instead of attacking, put the pope on a pedestal? By the same reason Leonardo Boff, of Liberation Theology, praises him. By the same reason that he is in favor with the Brazilian Protestant Left, which said, “Pope Francis is a promise of better days.”

All the Left is seeing it. Pope Francis is a promise of better days — for the Catholic, Protestant, secular and homosexual Left.

In this spirit, the mainstream media have highlighted approvingly the pope’s nomination of “Person of the Year” in the world’s biggest homosexual magazine.

With information from The Advocate and USAToday.

Portuguese version of this article: Papa Francisco é escolhido como “Personalidade do Ano” pela maior revista gay do mundo

Source: www.lastdayswatchman.blogspot.com

Recommended Reading:

The Advocate Attackes Julio Severo for Defending a Mother and Her Daughter Against Crazy Lesbian

Benjamin Netanyahu Under Fire for Not Bowing Down to Mythical Idol Nelson Mandela

By Julio Severo

The mainstream international media were chocked when Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and President Shimon Peres said they would not be attending the funeral of Nelson Mandela in South Africa, citing costs and health reasons.

Benjamin Netanyahu

In contrast, Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas did not miss the funeral.

Why so much fuss about it? Russian President Vladimir Putin decided not to attend it, and he has not received the widespread criticism Netanyahu did.

For Putin, who was an active leader in the infamous KGB, to attend Mandela’s funeral was just natural. During the white rule, South Africa was anti-communism and KGB was operating behind the scenes supporting the African National Congress, which is today the ruling party. Mandela’s victory was KGB’s victory. So there is no reason for a KGB agent or former agent to miss such event.

Mandela and Palestinian Terror

Yet, the international Left was not focused on Putin’s absence. Their focus was Netanyahu, who had good reasons for his decision, considering some Mandela’s statements:

1) “But we know too well that our freedom is incomplete without the freedom of the Palestinians.” (Address by President Nelson Mandela at the International Day of Solidarity with the Palestinian People, December 4, 1997, Pretoria.)

Comment by Julio Severo: The World Conference against Racism held by the United Nation in South Africa in 2009 was used as a platform against Israel, whose government boycotted it.

2) “I believe that there are many similarities between our struggle and that of the PLO.” (1990)

Comment by Julio Severo: PLO, or Palestine Liberation Organization, was a terrorist Islamic group responsible for many terrorist attacks against Israeli citizens, including children.

3) “We identify with the PLO because, just like ourselves, they are fighting for the right of self determination.”… “Arafat is a comrade in arms.”

4) “If one has to refer to any of the parties as a terrorist state, one might refer to the Israeli government, because they are the people who are slaughtering defenseless and innocent Arabs in the occupied territories.” (1990)

Nelson Mandela and Yasser Arafat

In contrast, Mandela had never said that he saw the defunct Soviet Union as a terrorist state. So, different of Netanyahu, there was no hindrance for Putin to honor the funeral of a man helped by KGB.

Modern South Africa and Its Crazy “Security”

Yet, there is somebody who definitely should not have attended Mandela’s funeral. He was not a world leader, but he was representative of the modern South Africa. His name is Thamsanqa Jantjie and he is a South African. According to the Associated Press, he is a schizophrenic man with violent tendencies. By simulating a sign language interpreter, he was able to be very near world leaders, including just 3 feet from Obama, at Mandela’s memorial.

Obama and Thamsanqa Jantjie (right)

Jantjie has a record of criminal behavior. According to DailyMail, his record involves: rape (1994), theft (1995), housebreaking (1997), malicious damage to property (1998), murder, attempted murder and kidnapping (2003) charges. Many of the charges brought against him were dropped, allegedly because he was mentally unfit to stand trial. He had been in a psychiatric institution for over one year.

The South African government was unable, or unwilling, to explain how he was able to get clearance to be near world leaders.

The Associated Press said that in South Africa, Obama was exposed to “an array of confusion and security risks that typically would not be tolerated by the Secret Service in the United States.” Jantjie is just an example. He was a definite threat to Obama and other leaders.

Obama was at the mercy of the South African government — and at the mercy of its schizophrenic, paranoid, bogus sign language interpreter. By the current South African standard, this was security, and it is much more security than most South Africans will never see in their lifetime.

Jantjie is a small sample of a South Africa the world refuses to recognize: the Marxist change Mandela brought to his nation made it the world’s rape capital, with also a very high rate of murders and assaults.

Thamsanqa Jantjie

Jantjie confessed that he hallucinated during the Mandela memorial. Just he did? What about the world leaders, including Obama and Bush, paying their tributes to a man who was a friend of Fidel Castro and Yasser Arafat, and had stances against Israel?

Wait a minute: hallucination or demon possession?

Modern South Africa and Old Witchcraft

Mandela inaugurated in South Africa an era where witchcraft was recognized and respected by the state.

Last year, the festivities of the centenary of the ruling African National Congress, of Mandela, were marked by animal sacrifices and rituals held by witches “to remember their ancestors and remember their own gods in a traditional way.”

This “traditional way,” or African way, is known in Brazil: candomble and other afro-Brazilian religions. By the way, if you disapprove this way by pointing that in the Bible God condemns witchcraft, the Brazilian state response follows the leftist mantra: criticism of the African worship and its gods and demons is discrimination, even racism!

South African witch

Two goats, two chickens and a bull were sacrificed to communicate with supposed dead ancestors in the centenary of the African National Congress. As Jantjie, witches were hallucinating during the ritual, commemorating the “liberation” of South Africa. Any attempt to classify them as “schizophrenic” would be labeled “racist.”

Rituals at Mandela’s funeral were similar. Animals were sacrificed. The ceremonial slaughtering of animals is one of the ways the “ancestors” are called upon for help. Guests in these rituals drink blood of the slaughtered animals. Veneration for the world of the ancestral spirits plays an important role in South African “culture.” (I know these terms very well. In Brazil, we are taught by our leftist government that Christianity is a religion and African witchcraft is just “culture”!)

Following this tradition, Mandela’s body was accompanied by individuals who kept communication with his spirit and other spirits.

I do not know if criticism of such witchcraft involvement in South Africa amounts to racism. But this is not the only problem. South Africa is under the spell of the Western Left.

Murderous Legacy

Mandela and his African National Congress were about to turn South Africa into a violent Marxist, communist country in the Soviet or Cuban model “when they were bought off by the [socialist] American Democratic Party and big multi-national business who showered the new black rulers with wealth and power, and, above all, with favourable international media coverage,” according to Rodney Atkinson, brother of Rowan, the famous “Mr. Bean.” They were bought off by the Western Left. The result? They became a violent socialist nation in the Western model.

Under the spell of this model, South Africa has been implementing moral decadence as no other African nation has done. For Mr. Atkinson, Mandela has a murderous legacy. In 1996, Mandela endorsed one of world’s most liberal abortion laws.

Abortion

The same year, Mandela’s new constitution made, according to LifeSiteNews, South Africa the first country in the world to place “sexual orientation” alongside race and religion as a restricted grounds for discrimination — something that was instrumental for the legalization of homosexual “marriage” a decade later.

In other words, while many other African nations follow the tradition of protecting the family, including against gay “marriage” and abortion, in this respect South Africa under Mandela followed the Western socialist model. Just in regard to religion, Mandela opened the national doors for the traditional African way and its demons.

Calvinism in South Africa

Just as other African nations, South Africa was also strictly against sodomy and abortion, under white administrations. White administration officials were mostly Calvinist, and undeniably South Africa greatly flourished under Calvinist inspiration. Their greatest challenge was to prevail over racial barriers — a common problem in Africa, considering tribal wars where tribes hated, enslaved and massacred one another for racial and “cultural” differences. Just consider Tutsis and Hutus.

The Calvinist difficulty to prevail over racial barriers opened the doors to resistance, especially communist, and a gradual weakening of their own religious tradition.

In 1985, while under white administration, 92% of Afrikaners (South African whites) were members of Reformed (Calvinist) Churches. But after the pro-abortion and pro-sodomy Mandela rule, everything changed. By late 2012, this figure had dropped to 41%, while actual weekly church attendance of Reformed Churches is estimated to be below 25%.

Gandhi, Apartheid and Racism

Their weakening follows a strange societal idea that Apartheid is worse than any evil South Africa has been suffering since the end of Apartheid.

Apartheid has been elevated above the rampant rapes, including of children and babies, in South Africa.

Apartheid has been elevated above the troublesome personal life of its greatest opponent, Mandela, described by DailyMail as a “womanizing wife-beater.”

Apartheid has been elevated above the evil of socialism, abortion and other threats.

And it is very suspicious that Marxism, adhered by Mandela, embraced a supposed fight against racism. According to American Black academic Walter Williams, Karl Marx was a racist man. How then did Mandela espouse Marxism to fight Apartheid and, later, used Marxism to legalize abortion?

And now, Marxists, whose father was a racist, put Mandela in the same mythical level of Mahatma Gandhi — another racist! For Gandhi, Africans were no better than the “Untouchables” of India. He thought black people were subhuman.

Mahatma Gandhi

The deification of Gandhi intentionally eclipsed the real Gandhi, just as the deification of Mandela has intentionally eclipsed the real Mandela: the high-rank member in the South African Communist Party and an abortion and homosexuality advocate.

Gandhi was, according to HuffingtonPost, elevated to a 20th century messiah by both European and American Protestant clerics and missionaries. For example, John H. Holmes, a liberal Unitarian pastor from New York, praised Gandhi in his writings and sermons with titles like “Gandhi: The Modern Christ” and “Mahatma Gandhi: The Greatest Man since Jesus Christ.”

Will Mandela be the new messiah deified by Protestant clerics and missionaries? Any doubts?

Calvinism and Pentecostalism

Perhaps Calvinists in South Africa might have averted the catastrophic destiny of their nation by opening the doors for spiritual revival. Some 100 years ago, when the African National Congress began its fight against Apartheid, the United States began to experience an abundant outpouring of the Holy Spirit, and the Pentecostal movement was born. The Holy Spirit did no distinction of race and color: whites and blacks were baptized in the Holy Spirit and whites and blacks became leaders in the Pentecostal church.

While leftist and feminist birth control campaigner Margaret Sanger preached the extinction of blacks through birth control some 100 years ago, poor whites and blacks were united in their Pentecostal experiences.

Pentecostalism, rejected by many affluent and proud Calvinists, has been God’s way to address racial issues since the early 1900s.

Calvinists, who blessed South Africa over three centuries with their capitalism and hard work, needed such Pentecostal experiences to face the 20th century challenges. Failure to do so eventually became victory for Marxist idols and their “liberation” with epidemic rapes, abortion and homosexuality.

Netanyahu: No to the Anti-Israel Idol

So I am not amazed at Barack Obama, Bill Clinton and Jimmy Carter going to South Africa to pay their tribute to their pro-abortion and pro-sodomy comrade. Yet, what was George W. Bush doing among them? Where was his courage just to say “no”?

South Africa is today an anti-Israel nation, in contrast with the past white administrations, which were pro-Israel.

Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu had the courage to say “no.” He could have made the very expensive travel, to see, as other world leaders did, the crazy antics of Thamsanqa Jantjie, a demon-possessed man who was hallucinating near Obama in a sad representation of the witchcraft, rape and murder culture in South Africa. He could see world leaders in their antics to pay tribute to an Anti-Israel man. But he did not do so.

An American reader in Charisma magazine noted, “Mandela was a supporter of Palestinian terrorism and an ardent critic of Israel. For the Israeli Prime Minister to participate in honoring him would be akin to him going to a tribute to the Ayatollah. It would be an insult to everyone who was a victim of Palestinian terrorism.”

Netanyahu, not Putin, has been under fire for not following world leaders, especially US leaders, in their attendance of Mandela’s funeral. But Israel should get used to be criticized and isolated. In the future, Israel will suffer more criticism and isolation, and all of this has been prophesized in the Bible.

Babylon and Its Idols

Old Babylon ordered citizens over its control to bow down to its mythical idol: “And the herald proclaimed aloud, ‘You are commanded, O peoples, nations, and languages, that when you hear the sound of the horn, pipe, lyre, trigon, harp, bagpipe, and every kind of music, you are to fall down and worship the golden image that King Nebuchadnezzar has set up. And whoever does not fall down and worship shall immediately be cast into a burning fiery furnace.’ Therefore, as soon as all the peoples heard the sound of the horn, pipe, lyre, trigon, harp, bagpipe, and every kind of music, all the peoples, nations, and languages fell down and worshiped the golden image that King Nebuchadnezzar had set up.” (Daniel 3:4-7 ESV)

Daniel the Jew did not bow down to the idol set up by Babylon.

Modern Babylon, especially represented by the socialist United States and Europe, wants the whole world to bow down to its mythical idols.

Netanyahu the Jew did not bow down to the anti-Israel idol set up by modern Babylon.

While America follows the ways of the nations, and nations follow the way of Babylon, Israel follows her own way and destiny.

Portuguese version of this article: Benjamin Netanyahu é criticado por não se prostrar ao ídolo mítico Nelson Mandela

Source: www.lastdayswatchman.blogspot.com

Recommended Reading:

Nelson Mandela: Israel Is Terrorist and Islamic Arabs Are Innocent

Anti-Israel Activist Speaks at Open Doors Brazil

Calvinism and Pentecostalism in Brazil