Sunday, March 17, 2019

Eduardo Bolsonaro says that “without Olavo, there would be no election of Jair Bolsonaro”


Eduardo Bolsonaro says that “without Olavo, there would be no election of Jair Bolsonaro”

By Julio Severo
Brazilian congressman Eduardo Bolsonaro, son of Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro said “without Olavo, there would be no election of Jair Bolsonaro.”
Eduardo Bolsonaro and Steve Bannon
His statement was made March 16, 2019, after the screening of Olavo de Carvalho’s movie “The Garden of Afflictions,” a movie with several New Age characteristics. The screening, presented in Washington D.C., is an effort of Steve Bannon to expand his movement and laying a strategic groundwork for Bolsonaro’s U.S. visit by propelling up Carvalho. Carvalho’s movie had been officially launched in the United States in 2017, but there was no American public willing to watch it.
In the event, Bannon said that he wants to present Carvalho’s ideas to the international public. If Bannon is honest, he is going to reveal to the international public the real Carvalho who
* defends the revisionism of the Inquisition, which tortured and killed Jews and Protestants, by saying “I repeat: there was never an entity called ‘the Inquisition’ and much less ‘Holy Inquisition.’”
 * says that “Protestantism was born from hatred and blood thirst. Its Christian inspiration is ZERO.”
* famously said that “Evangelical churches have done more harm to Brazil than the entire left” — implying that evangelical churches should be fought much more than Marxism has been fought.
In contrast with Eduardo, who credited Carvalho for the victory of his father, the New York Times credited it to televangelist Silas Malafaia, who led millions of evangelicals to support Bolsonaro.
Obviously, evangelicals, who were ambitiously coveted by Bolsonaro during the election, have had very little space now that the government power is firmly in his hands.
Less space for evangelicals means only one thing: More space for the influence of Carvalho and Bannon.
Bannon and Carvalho had two meetings last January. Both share the same background: They were inspired by René Guénon, an Islamic occultist who founded the Traditionalist School to promote esoteric conservatism and fight Marxism. Bannon, Carvalho and Guénon came from the same Catholic background.
After being fired by Trump, Bannon created a movement to influence right-wingers in Europe and Latin America. He had his first public meeting with Eduardo Bolsonaro August 2018. When asked by the international press, Jair Bolsonaro denied any ties with Bannon.
Late November, both met again: Eduardo Bolsonaro attended Bannon’s birthday party.
And last January, Bannon chose Eduardo as the head of his movement in Brazil and Latin America. “The Movement is honored to welcome Eduardo Bolsonaro as a distinguished partner, and Brazil, a key ally in South America,” Bannon said.
In spite of the fact that Bannon is today persona non grata in the U.S. government after President Donald Trump expelled him from the White House for leaking confidential information and opportunism, President Bolsonaro decided to honor Bannon in an exclusive dinner at the Brazilian Embassy in Washington on the eve of his meeting with Trump.
Bolsonaro’s decision to honor a Trump’s enemy is a slap in the face of Trump, just as Eduardo Bolsonaro saying that “without Olavo, there would be no election of Jair Bolsonaro” is a slap in the face of Silas Malafaia and evangelicals who elected Bolsonaro.
Carvalho, who has been a self-exiled Brazilian immigrant in the U.S. for 15 years, only is being a little more known now in the U.S. thanks to the efforts of Bolsonaro and Bannon, who are propelling him.
In the screening of Carvalho’s movie, he and Eduardo criticized the press. They do it all the time. I remembered Trump, who said about Bannon: “Steve pretends to be at war with the media, which he calls the opposition party, yet he spent his time at the White House leaking false information to the media to make himself seem far more important than he was. It is the only thing he does well.”
Such opportunism is a perfect description of Guénon’s adherents, who right now are taking advantage of Brazilian evangelicals by “leaking false information to the media” (“without Olavo, there would be no election of Jair Bolsonaro”) to make themselves seem far more important than they are.
Trump did very well by firing Bannon. But Bolsonaro is sowing troubles to himself by paying attention to Bannon and his Brazilian counterpart, Olavo de Carvalho.
Only God, through much prayer, can open Bolsonaro’s eyes.
With information from O Globo.
Recommended Reading:

Saturday, March 16, 2019

Steve Bannon, expelled by Trump for leaking information and self-promotion, will be the special guest of Jair Bolsonaro on the eve of the Brazilian president’s meeting with President Trump at the White House


Steve Bannon, expelled by Trump for leaking information and self-promotion, will be the special guest of Jair Bolsonaro on the eve of the Brazilian president’s meeting with President Trump at the White House

By Julio Severo
Steve Bannon, the former White House adviser who was expelled by President Donald Trump for leaking confidential information and self-promotion, will be the special guest of Jair Bolsonaro for an official dinner on Monday, the eve of the Brazilian President’s meeting with Trump at the White House.
Bannon, who has advised Bolsonaro’s son, Eduardo, will be among a group of right-wing guests joining Bolsonaro at his table for the exclusive event at the Brazilian ambassador’s residence.
Bolsonaro will be in Washington next week where he will meet with Trump in the Oval Office. Their discussions will include trade, transnational crime and restoring democracy in Venezuela.
Bolsonaro has made no secret of his desire to establish close ties with the United States. White House National Security Advisor John Bolton and other Trump officials have raised the possibility of a free trade agreement between the two nations.
Trump fired Bannon in 2017. In his public letter about the firing, Trump said,
Steve Bannon has nothing to do with me or my Presidency. When he was fired, he not only lost his job, he lost his mind…
Steve had very little to do with our historic victory… Steve doesn’t represent my base—he’s only in it for himself.
Steve pretends to be at war with the media, which he calls the opposition party, yet he spent his time at the White House leaking false information to the media to make himself seem far more important than he was. It is the only thing he does well. Steve was rarely in a one-on-one meeting with me and only pretends to have had influence to fool a few people with no access and no clue, whom he helped write phony books.
Bannon as the special guest of Bolsonaro in the Brazilian embassy in Washington prompted the headline of Veja, the Brazilian counterpart of Time magazine, “Bolsonaro’s dinner with Bannon in U.S. is a slap in the face of the Trump administration,” in a report that said, “The inclusion of Bannon among dinner guests at the Brazilian embassy is a breach of protocol with the host country.”
Bolsonaro should put himself in Trump’s shoes. Would he find respectful if Trump, in an official trip to Brazil to meet him, he first met a man fired by Bolsonaro for leaking confidential information and self-promotion?
According to Veja, the exclusive event of Bolsonaro for Bannon will happen under the influence of Brazilian astrologer Olavo de Carvalho, who has been a self-exiled immigrant in the U.S. for 15 years, and Eduardo Bolsonaro.
Bannon and Carvalho had two meetings last January. Both share the same background: They were inspired by René Guénon, an Islamic occultist who founded the Traditionalist School to promote esoteric conservatism and fight Marxism. Bannon, Carvalho and Guénon came from the same Catholic background.
After being fired by Trump, Bannon created a movement to influence right-wingers in Europe and Latin America. He had his first public meeting with Eduardo Bolsonaro August 2018. When asked by the international press, Jair Bolsonaro denied any ties with Bannon.
Late November, both met again: Eduardo Bolsonaro attended Bannon’s birthday party.
And last January, Bannon chose Eduardo as the head of his movement in Brazil and Latin America. “The Movement is honored to welcome Eduardo Bolsonaro as a distinguished partner, and Brazil, a key ally in South America,” Bannon said.
As part of his effort to expand his movement and laying a strategic groundwork for Bolsonaro’s U.S. visit, Bannon is propelling up Carvalho by officially inviting people to a hotel in Washington DC, on March 16, for the screening of Carvalho’s movie, which has several New Age characteristics. His movie was officially launched in the United States in 2017, but there was no American public willing to watch it.
Bolsonaro’s meeting with Bannon is not only uncomfortable for Trump, who had troubles and conflicts with Bannon. It is also uncomfortable for Brazilian evangelicals, who had massive influence on Bolsonaro’s victory, but now they have just to observe Bolsonaro giving opportunities and space for Carvalho and his “nominations” — at the expense of evangelicals. Now will they have to observe also Bannon getting also space for such privileges — again, at the expense of evangelicals?
Less space for evangelicals means only one thing: More space for the influence of Carvalho and Bannon.
It remains to be seen what Trump and evangelical leaders will think about Carvalho and Bannon, two adherents of a Islamic occultist, getting exclusivity from Bolsonaro.
With information from McClatchyDC, PR Newswire and Veja.
Recommended Reading:

Wednesday, March 13, 2019

Muslims Defeat Gay Curriculum in UK School


Muslims Defeat Gay Curriculum in UK School

By Julio Severo
To defeat a homosexual curriculum in a public school in the West is virtually impossible today, especially if you are a Christian parent concerned about the moral, spiritual and psychological well-being of your children. Try as hard as you can, any kind of civilized protest by you will face accusations such as “anti-gay,” “homophobic,” “intolerant,” etc.
In the United States, a father was arrested and prosecuted for protesting homosexuality being taught in his son’s kindergarten class in 2005.
So the clear message is: Protest homosexuality being taught to your children and you will be reviled, arrested and prosecuted, facing a risk of losing the custody of your own children.
Such sad fact may be reality to Christians in the United States and in the United Kingdom, but it seems not to apply to Muslims.
LGBTQ lessons have been stopped at the Parkfield Community School in Birmingham, England, following weeks of protests from angry Muslim parents, who withdrew their children from school. The withdraw involved 600 students, about 80% of the school population. You can read more in my article: Furious Muslim parents withdraw children from British school because their children are being brainwashed about gay rights and, phenomenally, the British government does not punish the parents
The LGBTQ lessons were being given by Andrew Moffat, assistant headteacher at the Parkfield Community School. Moffat, who is married to another homosexual man, is the author of Challenging Homophobia in Primary Schools and currently shortlisted for a world’s best teacher award.
Fascinatingly, he was able to challenge “homophobia” in primary schools attended predominantly by Christian children, who were taught by their parents and churches to love homosexual sinners and hate the homosexual sin. But he was not so successful in challenging “homophobia” in schools attended by Muslims, who are taught to hate and kill homosexual whenever possible.
Any Christian parent who would dare to protest, without threat and anger, such homosexual activist would face legal threats, arrest and prosecution. But Muslims parents did much more than Christian parents would do. They made furious protests.
Moffat said he tried to meet the Muslim parents, but stopped when they became aggressive. He has described receiving threats from parents online. He told the BBC: “I have felt very threatened.”
Protesters said Islam does not accept homosexuality, and the police, homosexual militants and government officials did not accuse the Muslim parents of “homophobia.”
The result was that the same “conservative” British government that does not tolerate Christian protests against the homosexual agenda just succumbed to the furious Muslim protests. The gay lessons were stopped, and the homosexual teacher was removed.
Interestingly, the “conservative” British government of Prime-Minister Theresa May was elected by conservative Christians to counter anti-conservative ideologies, including the homosexual and Islamic ideologies. But such “conservative” government has been unable or unwilling to fulfill its promises to defend Christian conservatism. Yet, it has been fully able to defend the gay and Islamic ideology in detriment of Christians and even directly against Christians.
There is no doubt that the “conservative” British government wants Christians to embrace the homosexual ideology.
But, contradictorily, it seems that the “conservative” British government wants also its Christian population to embrace Islam if they want to protect their children from homosexual indoctrination.
Parkfield Community School has 750 students and 98 percent of them are from an Islamic background. About 600 pupils, aged between 4 and 11, had been withdrawn from school in protest against homosexual lessons being taught by a homosexual activist.
The “conservative” British government took no measure against the furious Muslim parents who threatened the homosexual activist indoctrinating their children. On the contrary, the gay lessons were stopped.
If 98 percent of the students at the Parkfield Community School were Christian and about 600 pupils, aged between 4 and 11, had been withdrawn from school in protest by Christian parents for Christian reasons, would the “conservative” British government react without fury?
Conservative Christians in the United Kingdom elected a “conservative” British government that ultimately protects furiously homosexuality and Islam against Christians.
With information from The Guardian.
Recommended Reading about England:

Monday, March 11, 2019

Evangelical Leaders Vent Criticism of Brazil’s Bolsonaro Administration for Giving Them Very Little Space


Evangelical Leaders Vent Criticism of Brazil’s Bolsonaro Administration for Giving Them Very Little Space

Disgruntled with very few posts in the government, Evangelical Parliamentary Caucus promises to support the Bolsonaro administration only on issues such as abortion and gay agenda

By Julio Severo
Disgruntled with the fact that the Brazilian government has not talked to evangelical leaders and has given very little space for evangelicals in its high-profile posts, the Evangelical Parliamentary Caucus, traditionally the most conservative force in the Brazilian Congress, has decided to support the Bolsonaro administration only on ethical issues such as abortion and the gay agenda. Congressmen elected with support from evangelical churches are not sparing President Jair Bolsonaro, whom they helped elect, from public criticism on social networks.
Evangelicals raise their hands in prayer as they listen to a song during a service at the Assembly of God Victory in Christ Church in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. (AP Photo/Leo Correa)
Representative Marco Feliciano (Podemos-SP) used Twitter to send a message: “The communication has been terrible. When the government decides to rule alone, it becomes a giant with muddy feet.”
Representative Sóstenes Cavalcante (DEM-RJ) said that “ideologically, never” the Evangelical Parliamentary Caucus will “sabotage the government,” but he warned that “politics is done with dialogue or each one will take care of his tenure.”
Sóstenes, who is connected with Assemblies of God televangelist Silas Malafaia, added sadly: “The (evangelical) caucus never had space, but now it is worse.”
It was for Bolsonaro, who was elected largely by evangelicals — a fact acknowledged even by his socialist political enemy Fernando Haddad —, to give more space to his supporters. But he has not done so. Because his administration has proclaimed itself conservative, it was for him to at least give post to his more conservative supporters, who are just evangelicals.
However, it is not what is happening. If before Bolsonaro, evangelical leaders had little place in the government, now, as Sóstenes has pointed out, they have much less.
To make up for the very few posts he has given to evangelicals in government, some interpret that President Bolsonaro has appealed for another strategy to try to please the Evangelical Parliamentary Caucus: the moral discourse. There have been many government speeches showing that the conservative tone will have priority.
Bolsonaro’s effort today to keep evangelicals out of most of his ministries is a contrast with his attitude of seeking evangelical support during his campaign in 2018. He was even baptized by a Pentecostal minister in the Jordan River in Israel in 2016 in a clear political ploy to draw evangelicals. It worked. The U.S., Brazilian and Israeli press credited evangelicals for his victory.
Yet, if evangelicals are not getting the preference to fill the most important positions in the Bolsonaro administration, who is getting them? The two key government posts — Ministry of Education and Ministry of Foreign Affairs — were granted to adherents of the astrologer Olavo de Carvalho, a Brazilian immigrant self-exiled in the United States for 15 years who is known in Brazil for profanity, advocacy of the Inquisition, advocacy of smoking and Guenonian anti-Marxism.
While evangelicals have only one representative in a high-profile government ministry — Dr. Damares Alves, who is a Pentecostal minister and heads the Ministry of Family and Human Rights — olavetes, as the astrologer’s adherents are called, have received far more post to the detriment of evangelicals that elected Bolsonaro.
Olavetes brought with them all their well-known radicalism, including advocates of the Inquisition, who tortured and killed Jews and Protestants. One of these advocates was exposed by me in this recent article: An Undercover Agent of the Inquisition in Brazil’s Ministry of Education?
Such radicalism usually provokes crises, which are only avoided when there are authorities with open eyes. It was no different in that case. Last week, under pressure from the Brazilian military, all the adherents of the astrologer Olavo who had vital and strategic posts in the Ministry of Education were demoted to insignificant posts.
Silvio Grimaldo, an activist directly associated to the astrologer, complained on his Facebook page: “The purge of Olavo de Carvalho’ students from the Ministry of Education is the biggest betrayal within the Bolsonaro administration that has been seen so far.”
He has his reasons for complaining. He held a very high position in the Ministry of Education. He was demoted to a small and useless position and resigned.
However, he has no right to complain as if he and other adherents of the astrologer were owners of the Brazilian government. Who should complain of “betrayal” are evangelicals who were largely forgotten by Bolsonaro and besides not getting important positions, had to watch quietly important posts being delivered to olavetes submissive to an astrologer who advocates the Inquisition and attacks evangelicals.
Olavetes could perhaps speak in betrayal if they had been vital to the election of Bolsonaro. They were not.
Who was vital to Bolsonaro’s election were evangelicals, according to a New York Times report, which cited the name of Pentecostal minister Silas Malafaia as the evangelical leader who led millions of evangelicals to vote for Bolsonaro. But even the name of Malafaia has been little honored in the Bolsonaro administration, which prefers to often glorify the astrologer Olavo. Evangelicals might call it betrayal, but they do not do it.
What evangelical leaders are doing in the face of the obvious “betrayal” is to support the Bolsonaro administration, for the sake of Brazil, only on ethical issues such as abortion and the gay agenda. They will not support Bolsonaro on other political issues precisely because Bolsonaro gave preference to those who were not vital to his election — olavetes — to the detriment of those who were vital to his election — evangelicals.
In contrast, olavetes, as Grimaldo’s outburst showed, are revolted at losing vital positions they did not deserve.
The military who expelled olavetes from the Ministry of Education leadership did a great good to Brazil, because olavism is problematic in all its nature, especially since the source of its anti-Marxism is the Islamic sorcerer René Guénon, who founded the Traditionalist School, to promote a fascist esoteric “conservatism” to fight Marxism. Guenonianism has no shortage of fascism. Guénon’s greatest adherent, Julius Evola, was an advisor to the fascist dictator Benito Mussolini and to Nazism itself.
Activists influenced by Guénon cause chaos and confusion wherever they go. One of them passed through the White House and caused chaos and confusion. His name is Steve Bannon, who is now persona non grata in the U.S. government after President Donald Trump drove him out of the White House, calling him an opportunist and leaker of secret information to self-promote. Supported by evangelicals, Protestant Trump managed to get rid of Bannon’s craftiness and opportunism.
Coincidence or not, Bannon and Carvalho are today friends and united to promote their “conservatism,” and they are winning the hearts of Bolsonaro and his sons. Even supported by evangelicals, Bolsonaro and his sons have been unable to get rid of the craftiness and opportunism of Carvalho and Bannon.
Trump identified very well the opportunist and treacherous nature of Bannon, who is an adherent of Guénon and even praised Guénon and Evola at a Vatican conference in 2014. The nature of fascist esoteric “conservatives” is opportunistic and treacherous. This is the nature of Olavo de Carvalho. This is the nature of olavetes.
Yet, this is not the nature of evangelical leaders who worked so hard for the election of Bolsonaro and are now forgotten in vital government positions. The anti-Marxism of evangelical leaders and the evangelical population has no roots in Guénon and his “traditionalism,” a “conservatism” that has much more of esotericism and fascism in its soul than the alleged (syncretic) Catholicism that Bannon, Carvalho, and others Guenonians proclaim.
Evangelicals offered Bolsonaro an anti-Marxism based on the Bible. He largely rejected it.
Carvalho and Bannon offered Bolsonaro and his sons a Guenonian-based anti-Marxism. He largely accepted.
Anti-Marxism with evangelical foundations leads to good results. The United States, the most Protestant and most anti-Marxist nation in the world, is a good example, especially with President Ronald Reagan, who was a Protestant. American evangelical anti-Marxism is the greatest inspiration for Brazilian evangelical anti-Marxism. In fact, American anti-Marxism is traditionally the greatest ally of evangelical churches in Latin America.
Anti-Marxism with occult bases leads to disaster. Hitler, who was an anti-Marxist occultist, is an example.
In the 1960s, the military saved Brazil from communism. This is an undeniable truth. And now, with its pressure to destroy the influence of olavetes in the Ministry of Education, the Brazilian military is saving Brazil from the Guenonian anti-Marxism and its fascist esoteric “conservatism.”
Such a military intervention came in good time because Olavo de Carvalho was so self-assured that the Bolsonaro administration was under his spell that days ago he publicly called for the Federal Police to investigate me under the allegation that my denunciations against him involving the Inquisition and occultism are collusions paid by the Russian government that threaten national security. That is, he tried to use his influence on Bolsonaro to portray me as an enemy of the Brazilian government and to “encourage” the Brazilian State to persecute me.
Like many evangelicals, I voted for Bolsonaro. Like other evangelicals, I am saddened to see how olavetes, who are anti-evangelical opportunists, have won government offices.
Perhaps the necessary intervention of the military is the prayer of evangelicals being answered. With more prayers, Bolsonaro may someday remember evangelicals who supported him, and that the occupation of government posts by Carvalho’s activists is at the expense of evangelicals.
While Grimaldo and other olavetes complain and revolt because they lost posts they have never deserved and treat as “betrayal” their loss of undeserved privileges, fueling chaos and confusion against the government, evangelicals who deserved vital posts and did not win are not slandering the Bolsonaro administration as traitor and are not fueling any chaos and confusion. They are praying for the Brazilian president and will continue doing what they have always done: working against abortion and the gay agenda.
With information from Estadão.
Recommended Reading:

Friday, March 08, 2019

An Undercover Agent of the Inquisition in Brazil’s Ministry of Education?


An Undercover Agent of the Inquisition in Brazil’s Ministry of Education?

By Julio Severo
A rather mysterious revelation has shown that an advocate of the Inquisition is working within of Brazil’s Ministry of Education.
In a 6 March 2019 tweet, a user said,
“The book of professor Ricardo da Costa, who is now working for the government of the president @jairbolsonaro at INEP, needs everyone’s contribution to be published! ‘Visions of the Middle Ages,’ with an unpublished article on the Inquisition and much more.”
Ricardo da Costa himself confirmed the message by sharing it.
The presence of Costa in INEP, which is a division of the Brazilian Ministry of Education, is a total contradiction of the alleged mission of President Jair Bolsonaro, who had promised to remove ideological indoctrination from the Brazilian government, especially from its education.
While the mission of the Ministry of Education is to educate, Costa’s mission has been “educate” people on the alleged benefits of the Inquisition. At the same time that Costa is working in this ministry, he is launching his book on the Inquisition. He is an ideologist of the Inquisition.
On Facebook, Costa was involved in the “Study Group on the Inquisition with Professor Ricardo da Costa.” In addition to defending the Inquisition in internet articles, Costa is the author of the foreword to the Brazilian book “The True History of the Inquisition,” which seeks to sanitize the image of this murderous machine.
In an interview to Terça Livre, an internet channel of adherents of Brazilian astrologer Olavo de Carvalho, he explained that the Inquisition gave rise to the procedural legal system and that before it trials were summary.
Such information would seem interesting to people having no knowledge of history, but many centuries before the Inquisition, Apostle Paul was judged by Roman courts and his process took years. There was no summary judgement or execution. Paul had plenty of time to preach the Gospel while his process was in progress. So Costa’s information is a blatant lie.
Besides, Paul would have preferred to die for Jesus than killing for Jesus. Essentially, the Inquisition killed misusing the name of Jesus, to protect the religious, political and financial interests of the Catholic Church.
Costa has no support from the Apostle Paul and the New Testament to defend the Inquisition.
Jews, who were the main victims of the Inquisition, would not agree with Costa. Protestants, who were also victims, would agree with the Jews.
The Inquisition also operated in Brazil by torturing and killing Jews. The Inquisition was only stopped in Brazil by pressure of England, in the early 1800s, which did not want its travelling sailors and officials executed because they were Protestant.
With the election of Jair Bolsonaro, there was the hope that the Ministry of Education could, at last, include officially in the Brazilian history the persecution of the Jews under the Inquisition. It is an undisputable fact that the Inquisition tortured and killed Brazilian Jews.
It is an undisputable fact also that Jair Bolsonaro was elected especially by evangelicals, who are so supportive of the Jews that they want Bolsonaro to move the Brazilian embassy to Jerusalem. And there was gratitude — from Israel. In his first visit to Brazil to attend the inauguration of Bolsonaro, Israeli Prime Minister said that evangelicals are the best friends of Israel.
In his campaign, Bolsonaro actually said that the embassy’s move was fundamental, but now with the presidency firmly in his grip, he has made remarks suggesting that such move is not so important.
Was the evangelical vote important or not for him? It was so important that in 2016, while evangelical leaders were impeaching socialist president Dilma Rousseff, Bolsonaro, who is nominally Catholic, was in Israel being baptized by a Pentecostal minister in the Jordan River. In spite of the shining appearances, he was not converted to evangelicalism or Pentecostalism. His baptism was just a political ploy to draw evangelicals. It worked.
Yet, today the highest-level posts in his administration are in the hands not of evangelicals who supported him. They are in the hands of adherents of Carvalho, who even though a self-exiled immigrant in the U.S., is the most prominent advocate of the Inquisition in Brazil.
Evangelicals have been betrayed by political opportunism.
Surely, the current Ministry of Education has made efforts to remove Marxism. This is a good goal. Yet, the new minister, Ricardo Velez, is known not only as an adherent of Carvalho and enemy of Marxism, but as unfriendly to Trump. You can see this article: New Brazilian Education Minister: Hostile to Socialism and Trump, Friendly with Bolsonaro and Hillary
The good news is that at last the Brazilian Ministry of Education is allowing homeschooling, but individuals appointed to run its administration are also adherents of Carvalho, and all of them have few years of homeschool experience. And all of them believe and proclaim that the Inquisition promoted human rights and did not torture and kill Jews and Protestants.
I have been fighting for homeschooling in Brazil for over 20 years and my fight has been published in Brazil and other nations. In fact, I have published the first homeschool book in Brazil, The Way Home, by Mary Pride.
Rinaldo Belisário, a Baptist minister and specialist in education, has over 25 years of homeschool experience and he has even a homeschooling curriculum. Yet, Bolsonaro, who was elected by evangelicals, rejected evangelicals with large and old experience on homeschooling and appointed advocates of the Inquisition with much ideological militancy, but little experience on real homeschooling.
I have fought against Marxism in Brazil for decades, especially because of its opposition to homeschooling. But to mix homeschooling with the advocacy of the Inquisition is the Nazification of a good idea. I use the term Nazi because both Nazism and the Inquisition were engaged in persecuting, torturing and killing the Jews.
Let us not be deceived: Nazism also fought Marxism, and most Jews Hitler killed were Marxist. But Nazism’s anti-Marxism was occult in nature. Carvalho’s anti-Marxism is also occult in nature.
Did I fight so hard against Marxism occupying a throne in the Ministry of Education to see it now being occupied by revisionists of the Inquisition who embrace an anti-Marxist occultism?
Recommended Reading:
Recommended Reading on the Inquisition: