Friday, May 22, 2020

Satanism Glorified in Hollywood: Superman Possessed by Satan in DC Comics Movie Produced by Warner Bros


Satanism Glorified in Hollywood: Superman Possessed by Satan in DC Comics Movie Produced by Warner Bros

By Julio Severo
If you thought that only in witchcraft Satan is represented as a good creature, DC Comics will persuade you to change your mind. In its most recent animation movie, “Justice League Dark Apokolips War” (2020), there is a powerful battle between the Justice League and a demonic force called Darkseid — Dark Side.
Darkseid is destructive and evil. He has destroyed or possessed many superheroes in this movie. And he intended to destroy the Earth. But Dark Side is not Satan.
John Constantine invoking Satan
To help the weakened Justice League to defeat Dark Side, character John Constantine (Hellblazer) invokes Satan with a pentagram.
Constantine is an occultist, a Satanist.
After the invocation, Satan appears.
Satan possesses Superman.
And Satan uses a possessed Superman against Dark Side.
The DC Comics animation movie “Justice League Dark Apokolips War” was produced by Warner Bros. While Hollywood seeks to erase Jesus Christ from the U.S. culture, it keeps glorifying the fallen angel, Satan, who oppresses people.
Hollywood very rarely recognizes the existence of Jesus Christ, and when it does it, it does not glorify Him. But often Hollywood recognizes the existence of Satan, and when it does it, it glorifies him.
“Justice League Dark Apokolips War” portrays satanism, occultism and Satan himself as good alternatives. The main public of DC Comics is teens.
A presentation of satanism as normal to teens is a strong sign that the culture has been Satanized. And there is only one way to unsatanize teen victims of such culture: To present Jesus, whose ministry was marked by three main characteristics: preaching of the Gospel, healing of the sick and expelling of demons.
If even in the Jewish culture, which was highly moral, conservative and Bible-minded, there were plenty of demons for Jesus to expel, what to say of the U.S. culture?
Jesus Christ is the real Superhero who can unsatanize teens victims of a Satanized culture.
And the tools Jesus uses to deliver people from Satan, his demons and satanizations is Christians who imitate Him by preaching the Gospel, healing the sick and expelling demons.
John Constantine
In the end of “Justice League Dark Apokolips War,” the Justice League is able to control Satan and Dark Side. But in real world, this is impossible.
The belief, glorified in this DC Comics movie, that occultists and Satanists can control Satan is illusory. Instead of dispelling such illusion in its teen public, DC Comics makes the illusion strong.
Superman possessed
Once a human being is possessed by Satan, only Jesus and no one else, can deliver him. Even a Superman, if such being were real, could not deliver himself from Satan. Even a Justice League of multitudes of superheroes could not control or expel a single demon. No human being has such power. Only Jesus has.
Recommended Reading on Hollywood:
Recommended Reading on DC Comics:
Another Recommended Reading:

Wednesday, May 20, 2020

Norma McCorvey, a pro-life “actress” who faked evangelical and Catholic conversions to be exploited or to exploit financially pro-life evangelicals and Catholics?


Norma McCorvey, a pro-life “actress” who faked evangelical and Catholic conversions to be exploited or to exploit financially pro-life evangelicals and Catholics?

By Julio Severo
In a shocking 19 May 2020 report titled “The woman behind ‘Roe vs. Wade’ didn’t change her mind on abortion. She was paid,” the Los Angeles Times said,
When Norma McCorvey, the anonymous plaintiff in the landmark Roe vs. Wade case, came out against abortion in 1995, it stunned the world and represented a huge symbolic victory for abortion opponents: “Jane Roe” had gone to the other side. For the remainder of her life, McCorvey worked to overturn the law that bore her name.
But it was all a lie, McCorvey says in a documentary filmed in the months before her death in 2017, claiming she only did it because she was paid by antiabortion groups including Operation Rescue.
“I was the big fish. I think it was a mutual thing. I took their money and they’d put me out in front of the cameras and tell me what to say. That’s what I’d say,” she says in “AKA Jane Roe,” which premieres Friday on FX. “It was all an act. I did it well too. I am a good actress.”
In what she describes as a “deathbed confession,” a visibly ailing McCorvey restates her support for reproductive rights in colorful terms: “If a young woman wants to have an abortion, that’s no skin off my ass. That’s why they call it choice.”
Abortion was made legal in the United States in 1973, allowing the killing of unborn babies from conception to the last day of pregnancy. Yearly, about 1,000,000 unborn babies are killed in abortion facilities in the U.S.
The role of McCorvey was crucial to legalize abortion in the United States. So it was no surprise that her conversion in 1995 was celebrated by the pro-life movement.
The Los Angeles Times report also said,
The documentary includes scenes of McCorvey on election night 2016 — a few months before she died of heart failure at age 69 — expressing her support for Hillary Clinton. “I wish I knew how many abortions Donald Trump was responsible for,” McCorvey muses. “I’m sure he’s lost count, if he can count that high.”
The Rev. Phillip 'Flip' Benham, one of the two evangelical leaders who helped orchestrate McCorvey's religious conversion in the mid-1990s, denied paying her.
But the creators of the documentary reportedly uncovered documents showing that she had received more than $450,000 in ‘benevolent gifts’ from the anti-abortion movement.
Pro-life Christians are extremely generous in their efforts to fight abortion, and such generosity has been interpreted by the left-wing media as “exploitation” of her. The left-wing media refuses to consider if she exploited generous pro-life Christians.
The DailyMail report added that in the interview, “In addressing her activism for the religious right, McCorvey boasts: ‘I’m a good actress.’”
Probably her performance as an actress happened in her own “Christian” conversion. With Benham’s spiritual aid, McCorvey was baptized and became a pro-life evangelical Christian. But a short time later, she underwent another religious conversion: She became a Roman Catholic.
To please right-wingers, actress “McCorvey also took part in demonstrations where he burned the LGBT flag and the Quran,” according to the Los Angeles Times.
So she spent a short time as an evangelical actress and many more years as a Catholic actress. I do not understand how Christian leaders did not suspect her fast conversions.
Even though many in the pro-life movement are silent, some are speaking up to defend McCorvey. In a report titled “Former Jane Roe Norma McCorvey Was ‘100% Pro-Life,’ Prayed to End Abortion Just Before She Died,” LifeNews said,
Pro-life advocates who personally knew Norma McCorvey, the “Jane Roe” of Roe v. Wade, believe that her conversion to the pro-life movement and Christianity was sincere.
Sincere conversion to Christianity? Even though the pro-life evangelical and Catholic fight is important, both religions are much different. Evangelicals focus on Jesus and the Bible as the most important factors for the Christian life, while Catholics focus on Jesus, Mary, saints, Bible and many extra-biblical traditions as important factors for the Christian life.
So the “Christian” conversion of McCorvey was contradictory and problematic.
Rob Schenck, an evangelical minister and former leader of Operation Rescue, was also interviewed in the McCorvey documentary. Today, Schenck is a left-wing evangelical against Trump. The Los Angeles Times said:
Despite her visible role in the fight against abortion, McCorvey says she was a mercenary, not a true believer. And Schenck, who has also distanced himself from the antiabortion movement, at least partially corroborates the allegations, saying that she was paid out of concern “that she would go back to the other side,” he says in the film. “There were times I wondered: Is she playing us? And what I didn’t have the guts to say was, because I know damn well we were playing her.”
The left-wing media, which is exploiting the deathbed confession of a pro-life actress and portraying the pro-life movement as having exploited her, did not want to address the issue of if a pro-life actress can exploit generous pro-life Christians to get money. Actors and actresses can use a pro-life, conservative, right-wing, and Christian language for years just to get money.
There is a trail of problematic issues in the “Christian” conversion of McCorvey. In my view, the most insightful view came from pro-life leader and attorney Rebecca Kiessling, who said in her Facebook page:
A new documentary has Norma McCorvey, "Jane Roe" from Roe v Wade filmed in a "deathbed confession" in 2017 saying she was always in support of abortion rights and was only paid to say she was pro-life. Norma had serious mental health issues and lots of people in the pro-life movement knew it. I met her in person when we both spoke at an event held on my birthday and I was 9 months pregnant and had my birthmother with me. She kept wanting to cancel the event, but did end up speaking. She was very rough around the edges, joked about her extended years of serious substance abuse. I thought it was off that she had no interest in meeting her daughter who she gave birth to and placed for adoption as her case was working its way up to the U.S. Supreme Court.
Norma McCorvey and I were Facebook friends for the time she was on Facebook, but the things she posted were extremely bizarre. One time it was a really strange post involving a gun. Everyone was worried about her. She'd flip on things she said or posted regularly and started banning people as they'd inquire or call her out.
She was canceled by #ProLife speakers bureaus as a speaker because of her erratic behavior, including no-showing for events, canceling last-minute, saying she can't speak. She'd blame her behavior on the toll of being responsible for over a million dead babies each year. She signed a sworn affidavit seeking to overturn her case.
In this new documentary where she has her "deathbed confession" that she's always been for abortion rights, who knows what those people were doing to exploit her? Given her mental state, it's not a shock to me that this video has come out.
People with serious mental health issues need a real conversion to Christ. A real conversion to Christ solves such issues, because when Jesus enters your life, nothing is left untouched and unhealed.
McCorvey’s case shows that if as a Christian you fight abortion, which is a worthy fight, but neglect the supreme responsibility Jesus gave you (“go and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, and teaching them to obey everything I have commanded you,” Matthew 28:19-20 NIV), you are just doing a social, political or ideological work, which saves no eternal souls, and losing the opportunity to preach the whole Gospel to save souls.
The $450,000 in benevolent gifts given to McCorvey would have been much better employed if used to support missionaries who are preaching the Gospel, healing the sick, expelling demons, just as Jesus did, and making disciples and teaching them to obey everything Jesus commanded.
Recommended Reading:

Tuesday, May 19, 2020

Prophets and Adulterous Politicians


Prophets and Adulterous Politicians

By Julio Severo
To rebuke or not to rebuke a president’s adultery? That is the question — for the prophets.
Under God’s inspiration, Prophet Nathan said to King David: “You are in adultery!” He could be executed for rebuking the king, but he was not, because the king repented. David was a king in the Old Testament who knew the Lord.
Under God’s inspiration, John the Baptist said to King Herod: “You are in adultery!” He was executed for rebuking the king, who did not repent. Herod was a king in the New Testament who did not the Lord.
So whether they were in the Old Testament or New Testament, whether they knew the Lord or not, kings were rebuked by prophets.
A prophet’s life is hard. If he is faithful to God, he can be executed or honored. If he is faithful to a politician, everything will go well for a while, but when the time for reckoning with God comes, nothing will go well.
To hide his adultery with Bathsheba, David enlisted the help of Joab, a general who was faithful to him. Joab blindly obeyed David’s command to have Bathsheba’s husband, Uriah, killed.
Later, Joab died a humiliating death. He gained nothing from God for being faithful to King David. He gained nothing from God for helping to execute and cover up King David’s sins.
Being faithful to politicians in their sins, even politicians who claim to be dedicated to God, brings a humiliating end. Being faithful to God, even when the prophet is sacrificed by adulterous politicians, brings an end of eternal honor in the presence of God.
Is there a lack of politicians and adulteries of politicians today so that the rebukes of the prophets have ceased? No. And there are a lot more Joabs today to cover up any sin of politicians who call themselves Christians.
However, there are many pastors and pseudo-prophets who, fearing losing government permits for TV, radio and other government and presidential perks, prefer to take on Joab’s politically comfortable role. They are silent on their responsibility to be a prophetic voice of Nathan or John the Baptist in the lives of politicians. Other times their silence is because they know they have no morals to criticize politicians for what they themselves practice in their private lives. They are addicted to adultery, pornography and prostitution.
If alive today, before rebuking Davids, Herods and other politicians, Nathan and John the Baptist would say to the pastors: “You are in spiritual and political adultery because for fear of losing political privileges, you do not open your mouth to speak what politicians need to hear!”
In many other cases, they would say: “You are in adultery, because you left your wife to be with a younger woman!”
Joab’s case was based on and expanded from a comment by Luciana Micoski Pereira.
Portuguese version of this article: Os profetas e os políticos adúlteros
Recommended Reading:

Monday, May 18, 2020

Lawsuits against Jesus


Lawsuits against Jesus

By Julio Severo
If Jesus carried on his ministry today, he would suffer all kinds of lawsuits.
By healing the sick, he would be sued by medical groups and pharmaceutical companies that believe to have an exclusive monopoly on the sick and their cures.
By delivering people from demons, he would be sued by psychological and psychiatric groups that think to have an exclusive monopoly on possessed people whom they label as people with psychological problems.
By proclaiming that He is Savior and Lord, he would be sued by politicians from the left and right who believe they have an exclusive monopoly on the titles of saviors, lords and owners of the people.
Portuguese version of this article: Processos contra Jesus
Recommended Reading:

Monday, May 11, 2020

Trump’s White House is open to hear some parts of the Bible, but no biblical condemnation of sex of men with men


Trump’s White House is open to hear some parts of the Bible, but no biblical condemnation of sex of men with men

By Julio Severo
A confusion arising from media misinformation on a biblical view of an evangelical minister on homosexual sins sparked a furious condemnation from the White House against his alleged evangelical view contrary to homosexuality.
Ralph Drollinger
Media reports said that the evangelical minister, Ralph Drollinger, blamed homosexuality for the coronavirus epidemic. For example, the DailyMail headline said, “Minister who leads weekly bible study for Donald Trump's cabinet members condemns those with ‘a proclivity towards lesbianism and homosexuality’ as well as ‘environmentalists’ but blames China for unleashing God’s wrath during coronavirus crisis.”
Even the conservative media had initially an interpretation not much different. WND (WorldNetDaily) had a report headlined “Trump Cabinet Bible leader blames coronavirus on God’s ‘wrath.’”
In answer to these reports, White House spokesman Judd Deere, who is a homosexual activist, called the evangelical minister’s stance “disgusting” and “not something the president believes.”
Later, in a report headlined “Trump Cabinet Bible leader sets media straight on ‘God’s wrath,’ president’s faith” WND said:
Drollinger told WND in an interview he actually was reacting to some Bible teachers making that claim, “trying to get out in front of the story” with a careful analysis of Scriptures that came to the opposite conclusion.
At the weekly meeting – which of late has been a conference call due to the coronavirus restrictions — Drollinger said one Cabinet member asked: “Well, how does it feel to be ripped out of context? Welcome to the club.”
Among the regular attenders are Vice President Mike Pence, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, Housing and Human Services Secretary Ben Carson, Agriculture Secretary Sonny Perdue, Education Secretary Betsy DeVoss, Secretary Alex Acosta and the head of the Office of Management and Budget, Russell Vought.
Drollinger, the founder of Capitol Ministries, which provides Bible teaching, evangelism and discipleship to political leaders across the nation, said his intent with the discussion of God's wrath was to prepare the Cabinet members “for what inevitably is going to hit.”
Drollinger, a professional basketball player-turned-minister who hosts Bible studies for most of the top Republicans in the Trump administration, mentioned idolatry of homosexuality and environmentalism when explaining God’s judgment in the coronavirus crisis.
Sponsors of Ralph Drollinger and his Bible study in the White House
In materials Drollinger prepared for his Bible studies for the week of March 23, he gave evidence of the existence of God’s wrath, in which God abandons lost causes — including environmentalists who “serve the creature rather than the creator” and those with a “proclivity toward lesbianism and homosexuality.”
His Bible study material is entitled “Is God Judging America Today?”
Drollinger did not connect homosexuality to coronavirus, but because his Bible study in the White House had a mention of homosexuality and coronavirus, the Big Media, which is dominated by rabid homosexualists, hysterically connected both subjects and promoted their own hysterical interpretation.
To get things worse, the White House spokesman, driven by his own hysterical gay activism, jumped automatically to the same malicious interpretation.
Why does a “conservative” president need a gay spokesman at the White House to jump to hysterical interpretations? While George Washington expelled homosexuals from the government, Obama and now Trump welcome them.
Washington did not allow any homosexual in the government. Why did Obama allow? Why does Trump allow?
But the hysterical interpretation of the White House spokesman was telling. He thinks that any Bible interpretation that homosexuality brings consequence is “disgusting.” So does he think that God condemning homosexuality is also “disgusting”? Actually, the contrary is true. In the Bible, God says that homosexuality is disgusting:
“You shall not lie with a male as with a woman; it is an abomination.” (Leviticus 18:22 ESV)
Other versions say “disgusting.”
Would the White House gay spokesman say that it was “disgusting” God destroying Sodom because of homosexuality?
Drollinger seems to be free to give Bible studies in the White House provided that such studies do not contradict certain moral (and immoral) stances of Trump. He is not allowed to teach about how God condemns homosexual sins.
Washington, who believed in the Bible, would see as very disgusting the White House under Trump having a gay activist to condemn evangelical ministers based solely on biased reports from a left-wing media that worship sodomy with all their hearts and minds.
Washington also would see as very disgusting Judd Deere saying that “not something the president believes,” suggesting that Trump does not accept biblical condemnation of homosexuality and no consequence for this sin.
I do not think that it would be a surprise a gay spokesman in the Obama White House. It would not be a surprise a gay spokesman in the Obama White House saying that evangelical views on homosexuality are “disgusting” and that “not something President Obama believes.”
So what has really changed under Trump?
During the 8 years of the Obama administration, I exposed and criticized such left-wing stances, and now I am seeing the same left-wing stances in the Trump administration. But while I saw multitudes of evangelical ministers in the Obama era criticizing him, now I see multitudes of evangelical ministers silent for the same sins in the Trump administration.
I am not surprised when I see left-wing presidents doing left-wing things. But I am surprised when I see right-wing presidents doing left-wing things. And I am much more surprised when I see evangelical ministers silent about such things.
Americans talk so much about the Constitution, but it does not defend homosexuality and abortion. In fact, the Founding Fathers who drafted the Constitution saw the Bible as God’s Constitution, the divine Constitution above all human constitutions. No one of them supported homosexuality and abortion.
There is another thing where Trump and Obama are similar. When Obama asked national prayers for the United States, he never asked Americans to repent from their sins. Similarly, when Trump asks national prayers for the United States, he never asks Americans to repent from their sins.
Both behaviors are very different from George Washington and other old U.S. presidents. When they asked national prayers for the United States, they always asked Americans to fast and repent from their sins.
Washington, the first U.S. president, expelled homosexuals from his administration, because he was serious about sins and repentance. Why does not Trump have such seriousness?
Yet, how can Trump ask Americans to repent from homosexuality and other sins if they refuse to see these sins as disgusting? How can they repent from sins if they do not feel the dirty weight of such sins? How can they condemn sins and repent from them if they refuse to accept God’s condemnation of homosexuality and other sins
Traditionally, casinos are places of corruption, dirty money, drugs and prostitution — both female and male. Casino owners see no evil in homosexuality.
Casino owners see no need to repent from anything. This is why in national days of prayer in the U.S., Trump, who is a casino owner, has never done what George Washington always did: to repent and ask the American people to repent from their sins.
In fact, in the last national prayer, Trump inaugurated a totally different National Day of Prayer: He invited leaders of non-Christian and anti-Christians religions also to lead prayers! Washington never did it. Instead of a National Day of Prayer, with fasting and repentance, just as Washington did, Trump inaugurated a National Day of Apostasy, with leaders of non-Christian and anti-Christians religions praying to their gods, spirits and demons to “bless” America. Their prayers are disgusting to God. Their prayers and mantras are reputed as curses by God.
There are so many evangelical ministers around Trump, often telling him what he wants to hear, that it seems that people forget that Trump is the owner of a network of casinos. So is it any wonder Trump’s hard time to condemn homosexuality, even though he has a Presbyterian background? Is it any wonder that the Trump administration is promoting homosexuality around the world?
He is just doing what any casino owner would do. Sadly, it is what Obama would do too.
Understand Trump’s predicament. If he repents from his sins, he will transform his casinos in decent workplaces and decent hotels — free from corruption, dirty money, drugs, prostitution and homosexuality. Would he be willing to do such repentance? Would he be willing to extend such repentance to his administration and nation?
Only if he has a real encounter with Christ.
Recommended Reading: