Wednesday, March 04, 2020

Trump Praised Gay “Marriage” on Eve of India Visit


Trump Praised Gay “Marriage” on Eve of India Visit

Homosexualist population control as a new NSSM 200 can be behind Trump’s insistence on praising gay “marriage” and other gay issues

By Julio Severo
President Donald Trump provoked confusion among his conservative supporters on February 21, 2020 after he praised a Bollywood movie defending gay “marriage” before his trip to India.
“Great!” Trump tweeted in response to homosexualist activist Peter Tatchell, who wrote on Twitter that the gay “marriage” movie, titled “Shubh Mangal Zyada Saavdhan,” was intended to persuade Indians to support the “normalization” of homosexuality.
Trump’s tweet surprised many of his supporters when he simultaneously retweeted the post from the homosexualist activist and supported gay “marriage” because most of his supporters, who are conservative evangelicals, do not support gay activism and gay “marriage.” See the WND article “President Trump's most dangerous error” by Scott Lively.
There is a massive problem of boys preyed on and raped by homosexuals, but Trump has ignored their plight. And when India has a massive problem of Christians being persecuted and killed by Hindus, he focused on same sex perversion. He praised a fake marriage made by sexual perversion. Why not focus on homosexual violence and predatory gay indoctrination against boys?
If conservative evangelicals wanted gay activism and gay “marriage,” they would have voted for Hillary Clinton, who had promised to support these issues. In fact, they voted for Trump because they were tired of former President Barack Hussein Obama already doing these same things.
They were tired of seeing the Obama administration praising and even pushing to decriminalize homosexuality in countries around the world. But what do they see now? The same things.
Even then, Perkins seemed not to believe that Trump was behind the effort, because he said “it doesn’t seem that President Trump – or anyone else in the administration — authorized this ‘campaign.’”
Perkins showed a willingness to support such effort only to end violence against homosexuals, not raising any questions about why to put violence against homosexuals above homosexual violence against children, through sexual violence or predatory indoctrination, and not questioning if there was more than the eyes can see.
My criticism of the soft stance of Perkins and the Family Research Council (FRC) on this issue drew the attention of Right Wing Watch, a left-wing organization that monitors conservatives, which sided with Perkins and FRC against me.
As I suspected, there was more than the eyes can see. According to LifeSiteNews,
In a video interview with a fellow gay, Dave Rubin of the Rubin Report, published this week, Grenell perhaps admitted that he might be seeking more than just the decriminalization of homosexuality:
We’re making so much progress [with the decriminalization campaign].  Granted, this is going to be a long fight, trying to convince sixy-nine countries to do a change in domestic laws, to not criminalize homosexuality.
Grenell did not stop there.  He added:
And that’s all this is is ‘step one,’ is just to work on criminalization. Others are working on steps two to twenty.
Grenell did not explain what steps 2–20 might be, leaving plenty of room for interpretation by pro-marriage and pro-family conservatives.
So, in the words of Grenell, the most promoted and praised homosexualist by Trump, decriminalization is just the first of many other “unknown” steps in the ladder of homosexualist expansionism.
When Obama and Hillary talked about decriminalization of homosexuality around the world, conservatives understood that there was a strategy and decriminalization was just the beginning. Why in Trump’s case do they want to believe that there is no strategy? They should be more prudent, because Trump has a history of supporting conservatives and liberals at the same time. As a billionaire, he used to donate to Billy Graham and abortion and homosexual groups, perhaps to please both conservatives and liberals.
The fact is, just as Obama had a strategy to use decriminalization as a launching pad for many other gay issues, Trump has the same strategy, and his strategist is a hardline homosexualist. And probably there are bigger strategies behind decriminalization. After all, how explain that left-wing Obama and right-wing Trump have the same obsession to decriminalize homosexuality around the world?
While the U.S. government promoted gay “marriage” through the efforts of the left-wing president Obama, now the U.S. government, under Trump, is promoting the same fake marriage. As far as gay “marriage” is involved, left and right in the United States are two sides of the same coin.
What is behind this? My take is that some sort of modernized and sophisticate NSSM 200 is in play. The United States National Security Council, the highest decision-making body on foreign policy in the United States, promulgated, on December 10, 1974, a top secret document entitled National Security Study Memorandum 200, also called The Kissinger Report. Its subject was “Implications of Worldwide Population Growth for U.S. Security and Overseas Interests.” This document was the result of collaboration among the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), the United States Agency for International Development (USAID), and the Departments of State and Defense.
NSSM 200 is the most comprehensive and important document on population control ever devised by a government.
NSSM 200 continues to be the foundational document on population control issued by the United States government. It therefore continues to represent official United States policy on population control.
NSSM 200 is critically important to pro-life workers all over the world, because it completely exposes the unsavory and unethical motivations and methods of the population control movement.
If the goal of the CIA, USAID, the State Department and the Department of Defense is to reduce the world population, what method is better than homosexuality, which is the perfect “birth control”?
Some could say that only left-wing presidents in the White House, presidents from the Democratic Party, could advance anything similar to NSSM 200. Actually, the original NSSM 200 was made by the CIA, USAID, the State Department and the Department of Defense under the Republican conservative administration of Gerald Ford. So NSSM 200, as a population control strategy, is a product 100 percent Republican.
Both left-wingers and right-wingers in the White House are committed to the mission, probably pressured by some higher objective of the U.S. government, to reduce the world population. There is no other reason why left-wing Obama and right-wing Trump would engage in the infamous global effort to decriminalize homosexuality while thousands of boys are raped, psychologically and physically, by predatory homosexualists.
Probably because of bigger strategies of a sophisticate homosexualist NSSM 200, with his global effort to decriminalize sodomy Trump dispelled the false notion among conservatives that Obama had the monopoly on the advocacy of gay “marriage.” No, the monopoly belongs to the U.S. government, under left-wingers and right-wingers.
Gay “marriage” totally fulfills the objective of NSSM 200. This fake marriage is infertile and destroys the mission of real marriage: childbearing.
NSSM 200 seeks reduction of births. Gay “marriage” successfully does it.
Under left-wingers and right-wingers, generously backed by Hollywood, America has become a propaganda machine for gay “marriage.” With Trump is not different, even though he has a very special relationship with evangelicals, who are his main political supporters and they are against such fake marriage. In this issue, their relationship is marked by silence. Trump has remained silent about LGBT persecution against evangelist Franklin Graham, his most prominent evangelical supporter, while Graham has remained silent about Trump supporting gay “marriage” and other homosexual issues.
If the CIA, USAID, the State Department and the Department of Defense had not perverted the mission of the U.S. government with NSSM 200, Trump would understand that much more important than valuing, praising and protecting homosexuality is to protect children from predatory homosexual indoctrination and violence. Protection of children, not homosexuality, should be priority.
Today’s conservative evangelicals run the risk of being labeled hypocrites by future generations of conservative evangelicals. If Obama was never spared for praising a gay “marriage” movie of Bollywood, why is Trump spared? Why are many evangelical conservatives silent? Why cannot they see the bigger plan, a homosexualist NSSM 200, behind Obama and Trump?
The same Bible that condemns Obama for praising gay “marriage” also condemns Trump for the same sin. Evangelical conservatives should never forget that.
Liberals do not praise Trump’s praise for gay “marriage” because they hate him in other issues where he shows conservative stances. For example, liberal Christianity Today criticized Trump over everything, even saying that he should be impeached, but it spared him in one thing: sodomy.
If behind the propaganda of affordable family planning services the U.S. government had a much darker agenda of population control through NSSM 200, should it be any surprise if behind the propaganda of “decriminalization of homosexuality” is a much darker agenda of homosexualist expansionism and imperialism for the purpose of population control?
Hopefully, Tony Perkins, the Family Research Council and other evangelical groups will not say this time, “it doesn’t seem that President Trump authorized himself to praise the gay ‘marriage’ movie of Bollywood.”
It is past time for Tony Perkins and the Family Research Council to denounce Trump’s non-authorized praise of gay “marriage.”
With information from the DailyMail and FoxNews.
Recommended Reading:

No comments :