Trump Praised Gay “Marriage” on Eve of India Visit
Homosexualist population control as a new NSSM 200 can be behind Trump’s insistence on praising gay “marriage” and other gay issues
By Julio Severo
President Donald Trump provoked confusion among
his conservative supporters on February 21, 2020 after he praised a Bollywood
movie defending gay “marriage” before his trip to India.
They were tired of seeing the Obama
administration praising and even pushing to decriminalize homosexuality in countries
around the world. But what do they see now? The same things.
Richard Grenell, an
open gay “married” to another gay promoted and appointed by Trump recently as
the intelligence czar, was chosen by Trump in February 2019 to lead a
global effort to decriminalize homosexuality. In that time, The
Advocate, the largest gay magazine in the world, mentioned Scott Lively, Tony
Perkins and me, Julio Severo, as critics of such effort.
Even then, Perkins seemed not to believe that
Trump was behind the effort, because he
said “it doesn’t seem that President Trump – or anyone else in the
administration — authorized this ‘campaign.’”
Perkins showed a willingness to support
such effort only to end violence against homosexuals, not raising any questions
about why to put violence against homosexuals above homosexual violence against
children, through sexual violence or predatory indoctrination, and not
questioning if there was more than the eyes can see.
My criticism
of the soft stance of Perkins and the Family Research Council (FRC) on this issue
drew the attention of Right Wing Watch, a left-wing organization that
monitors conservatives, which sided with Perkins and FRC against me.
As I suspected, there was more than the
eyes can see. According
to LifeSiteNews,
In a video interview with a fellow gay,
Dave Rubin of the Rubin Report, published this week, Grenell perhaps admitted
that he might be seeking more than just the decriminalization of homosexuality:
We’re making so much progress [with the
decriminalization campaign]. Granted,
this is going to be a long fight, trying to convince sixy-nine countries to do
a change in domestic laws, to not criminalize homosexuality.
Grenell did not stop there. He added:
And that’s all this is is ‘step one,’ is
just to work on criminalization. Others are working on steps two to twenty.
Grenell did not explain what steps 2–20 might
be, leaving plenty of room for interpretation by pro-marriage and pro-family
conservatives.
So, in the words of Grenell, the most
promoted and praised homosexualist by Trump, decriminalization is just the
first of many other “unknown” steps in the ladder of homosexualist expansionism.
When Obama and Hillary talked about
decriminalization of homosexuality around the world, conservatives understood
that there was a strategy and decriminalization was just the beginning. Why in
Trump’s case do they want to believe that there is no strategy? They should be
more prudent, because Trump
has a history of supporting conservatives and liberals at the same time. As
a billionaire, he used to donate to Billy Graham and abortion and homosexual
groups, perhaps to please both conservatives and liberals.
The fact is, just as Obama had a strategy
to use decriminalization as a launching pad for many other gay issues, Trump
has the same strategy, and his strategist is a hardline homosexualist. And
probably there are bigger strategies behind decriminalization. After all, how explain
that left-wing Obama and right-wing Trump have the same obsession to
decriminalize homosexuality around the world?
While the U.S. government promoted gay
“marriage” through the efforts of the left-wing president Obama, now the U.S.
government, under Trump, is promoting the same fake marriage. As far as gay
“marriage” is involved, left and right in the United States are two sides of
the same coin.
What is behind this? My take is that some
sort of modernized and sophisticate NSSM 200 is in play. The United States National
Security Council, the highest decision-making body on foreign policy in the
United States, promulgated, on December 10, 1974, a top secret document
entitled National Security Study Memorandum 200, also called The Kissinger
Report. Its subject was “Implications of Worldwide Population Growth for U.S.
Security and Overseas Interests.” This document was the result of collaboration
among the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), the United States Agency for
International Development (USAID), and the Departments of State and Defense.
NSSM 200 is the most comprehensive and
important document on population control ever devised by a government.
NSSM 200 continues to be the foundational
document on population control issued by the United States government. It
therefore continues to represent official United States policy on population
control.
NSSM 200 is critically important to
pro-life workers all over the world, because it completely exposes the unsavory
and unethical motivations and methods of the population control movement.
If the goal of the CIA, USAID, the State
Department and the Department of Defense is to reduce the world population,
what method is better than homosexuality, which is the perfect “birth control”?
Some could say that only left-wing
presidents in the White House, presidents from the Democratic Party, could
advance anything similar to NSSM 200. Actually, the original NSSM 200 was made
by the CIA, USAID, the State Department and the Department of Defense under the
Republican conservative administration of Gerald Ford. So NSSM 200, as a population
control strategy, is a product 100 percent Republican.
Both left-wingers and right-wingers in the
White House are committed to the mission, probably pressured by some higher
objective of the U.S. government, to reduce the world population. There is no
other reason why left-wing Obama and right-wing Trump would engage in the
infamous global effort to decriminalize homosexuality while thousands of boys
are raped, psychologically and physically, by predatory homosexualists.
Probably because of bigger strategies of a
sophisticate homosexualist NSSM 200, with his global effort to decriminalize
sodomy Trump dispelled the false notion among conservatives that Obama had the
monopoly on the advocacy of gay “marriage.” No, the monopoly belongs to the
U.S. government, under left-wingers and right-wingers.
Gay “marriage” totally fulfills the
objective of NSSM 200. This fake marriage is infertile and destroys the mission
of real marriage: childbearing.
NSSM 200 seeks reduction of births. Gay
“marriage” successfully does it.
Under left-wingers and right-wingers, generously
backed by Hollywood, America has become a propaganda machine for gay
“marriage.” With Trump is not different, even though he has a very special
relationship with evangelicals, who are his main political supporters and they
are against such fake marriage. In this issue, their relationship is marked by
silence. Trump
has remained silent about LGBT persecution against evangelist Franklin Graham,
his most prominent evangelical supporter, while Graham has remained silent
about Trump supporting gay “marriage” and other homosexual issues.
If the CIA, USAID, the State Department
and the Department of Defense had not perverted the mission of the U.S. government
with NSSM 200, Trump would understand that much more important than valuing,
praising and protecting homosexuality is to protect children from predatory
homosexual indoctrination and violence. Protection of children, not
homosexuality, should be priority.
Today’s conservative evangelicals run the
risk of being labeled hypocrites by future generations of conservative
evangelicals. If Obama was never spared for praising a gay “marriage” movie of
Bollywood, why is Trump spared? Why are many evangelical conservatives silent?
Why cannot they see the bigger plan, a homosexualist NSSM 200, behind Obama and
Trump?
The
same Bible that condemns Obama for praising gay “marriage” also condemns Trump
for the same sin. Evangelical conservatives should never forget that.
Liberals do not praise Trump’s praise for
gay “marriage” because they hate him in other issues where he shows
conservative stances. For example, liberal
Christianity Today criticized Trump over everything, even saying that he should
be impeached, but it spared him in one thing: sodomy.
If behind the propaganda of affordable
family planning services the U.S. government had a much darker agenda of
population control through NSSM 200, should it be any surprise if behind the
propaganda of “decriminalization of homosexuality” is a much darker agenda of
homosexualist expansionism and imperialism for the purpose of population
control?
Hopefully, Tony Perkins, the Family
Research Council and other evangelical groups will not say this time, “it
doesn’t seem that President Trump authorized himself to praise the gay ‘marriage’
movie of Bollywood.”
It is past time for Tony Perkins and the
Family Research Council to denounce Trump’s non-authorized praise of gay
“marriage.”
Recommended Reading:
Posts
No comments :
Post a Comment