Facebook Censors Comment about Lesbians But It Does Not Censor Homosexual Comments against Jesus Christ
By Julio
Severo
Few minutes ago I received the following
message from Facebook:
This
post goes against our Community Standards.
Only
you can see this post because it goes against our standards on hate speech.
Next, Facebook showed the
“offensive” comment in Portuguese: “As duas sapatonas foram mau exemplo.”
The
translation is: “Both bull dykes were a bad example.”
This was not a Facebook post in my account. It was just a comment in the page
of a conservative friend.
You’re
Temporarily Blocked From Posting
This
temporary block will last 30 days, and you won’t be able to post on Facebook
until it’s finished.
If
you post something that goes against our standard again, your account will be
blocked for another 30 days.
Please
keep in mind that people who repeatedly post things that aren’t allowed on
Facebook may have their accounts permanently disabled.
So
my Facebook account (https://www.facebook.com/julio.severo) will be blocked for thirty days
(effective August 17, 2018) not because I advocated violence against lesbians.
I was blocked because I used the very popular Portuguese term “sapatona,” which means literally “big shoe” and in Brazil it is a word traditionally used to refer to masculinized women using men’s
big shoes! It seems that the translation into
English may be “bull dyke.”
Recently,
a Brazilian homosexual singer called Jesus
“gay,” “transvestite” and “transsexual.”
His offensive comment flooded Facebook pages throughout Brazil, and there was no
reported censorship or block against what the homosexual activist said against
Jesus. Yet, because I just said that the behavior of two “sapatonas” was a bad
example, Facebook, which did not see any hate speech in a homosexual reviling
Jesus, is punishing me with a 30-day block of my account. So am I supposed to say that the behavior of “honored” lesbians is a good example, especially to children?
This is Facebook’s standards: Any popular
term that homosexuals do not like is “hate speech” but when their dirty words against
Jesus Christ flood Facebook, there is not hate speech.
This is not the first 30-day block of
Facebook against me.
From June 10 to July 10 my
Facebook account was blocked over a post against Islamic sexual violence
against European girls.
The whole month of February 2018 I remained
blocked because I denounced the homosexual agenda and the Islamic invasion of
Europe. See my article: Why
Does Facebook Harass and Censor Christians?
Facebook also imposed a 30-day block
against me on December 2017 because I mentioned the Christian duty to love
sinners, including homosexuals. You can read my article here: Why
Does Facebook Grant Free Speech to Anti-Christian Radicals and Impose
Censorship on Christians?
And on June 2017 Facebook imposed another
30-day block against me because I was reporting on Brazilians who were fined
for calling a homosexual “fag.” See my article: “Facebook,
Censorship, Profanity, Name-Calling and Foul Language.” In this
case, Facebook backtracked after a California-based legal group threatened to
sue Facebook on my behalf. Because of the legal threat, Facebook recognized
that its actions were censorship. See my article: Facebook
Acknowledges Its Own Censorship on Julio Severo. What Happens Now?
Perhaps one of the most shameful acts of
Facebook against me was to censor Leviticus 18:22, a famous Bible verse that I
had posted on my profile, but Facebook did not like it and removed it. See my
article: Help!
Facebook Is Censoring Bible Verses
This censorship against a Bible verse
immediately became headline on WND (WorldNetDaily), in a report titled “Famous
Bible verse too sizzling for Facebook.”
Because of this scandal, Facebook
contacted WND with this message:
“As
soon as we were notified of the problem, we began to investigate and restored
the content as soon as we were able to identify the mistake. The content has
been restored since it didn’t violate our standards. We’ve informed Mr. Severo
of the restoration and apologized for the error.”
(See the WND report “Facebook
finally responds on censoring hot Bible verse”)
Yet, the Bible post was not restored and I
have never received any apology from Facebook.
If the Facebook owner, who is a left-wing Jew,
does not care even about Leviticus 18:22, a famous verse from the Jewish
Scriptures, why would he care about a post attacking Islamic sexual violence
against European girls?
What I wonder is: How can a Jew, who
belongs to a race and religion historically oppressed by Muslims, censor my
effort to denounce Islamic sexual violence?
Earlier this year, a
Jew denounced Facebook for excluding Israel and including Palestine.
Is Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg against his own race and evangelical
Christians, the most important allies of the Jews?
Tell Mr. Zuckerberg that Julio Severo is
an evangelical Christian who is a passionate advocate of the Bible and Israel in
its biblical borders.
Portuguese
version of this article: Facebook censura comentário sobre lésbicas, mas não
censura comentários homossexuais contra Jesus Cristo
Recommended Reading on Facebook
censorship:
Another
Recommended Reading:
Recommended
Reading on the U.S. Left against Julio Severo:
No comments :
Post a Comment