Ion Mihai Pacepa and Disinformation
By Julio
Severo
In
the book “Disinformation” (published by WND in 2013), Ion Mihai Pacepa offers
his view on a Liberation Theology and Islamic terrorism exclusively created by
the KGB and a Nazism and Soviet Marxism as “brothers.”
 |
| Ion Pacepa |
As
soon as his book was published, I acquired it. Before reading it, I had already
published some articles on him. But after reading the book, I was surprised at
his exceedingly simplistic conclusions.
Jewish Issue and a Supposed Equality Between Nazism and Soviet Marxism
Pacepa
says that Nazism and Soviet Marxism were absolutely similar. In fact, there
were similar points but as any historian knows and as every Israel-loving
Christian knows, the most important issue in the 2nd World War was the
Holocaust that Nazis committed against the Jews, annihilating 6 million of
them. In this specific issue, was there equality between Nazism and Soviet Marxism?
What
History records is that while the Nazi army annihilated the Jews throughout
Europe, the Soviet Union’s Red Army consisted of thousands of Jews, who helped
annihilate Nazism. While the Gestapo (the Nazi secret police) relentless
persecuted the Jews, NKVD, the KGB predecessor, was founded by the Soviet Jew Genrikh
Yagoda, considered the greatest Jewish murderer in the 20th century, according
to an Israeli
newspaper.
So as
far as the 2nd World War Jews are concerned, Nazism and Soviet Marxism were in
opposed sides: Nazism was a total enemy of the Jews while the Soviet Marxism
was a friend. Even though this in no way excuses the atrocities of the Soviet
Union, it freed the first Nazi concentration camp and it was the first nation
to acknowledge officially at the United Nations the modern State of Israel in 1948.
Hitler’s
anti-Jewish hatred found no match in the Soviet Union, but in a powerful U.S.
capitalist of his time.
My
article “Hitler’s
Strident Anti-Marxism,” based on the views of Henry Ford (a capitalist
magnate of the automobile industry) and Hitler, brings literal mentions by them
and shows that their hatred of the Soviet Marxism was derived from the fact
that the Jews had a certain control of the communist revolution in Russia. You
can see more information in my article “Jewish
Issues: A Clarification to Christians about Their Perception on the Jews.”
Is Liberation Theology a KGB’s Daughter?
In
his book Pacepa insists that KGB is the mother of Liberation Theology. But both
U.S. and Brazilian Catholics dispute Pacepa. (Brazil is the largest Catholic
nation in the world, heavily affected by Liberation Theology.) U.S. Catholic
author John L. Allen, of Crux, said:
“Catholic
Archbishop Hélder Câmara of
Olinda and Recife in Brazil didn’t have to be ‘maneuvered.’ He was already on
board with liberation theology before anyone in Moscow knew it was stirring.
That’s not to say the KGB didn’t do whatever it could to support leftist
movements in Latin America critical of capitalism and the United States. It
would be surprising if they hadn’t, given the zero/sum Cold War logic that
anything that seemed to hurt one side benefited the other. In that sense,
Pacepa is likely correct about the KGB strategy, but may be giving the agency
too much credit for its results.”
Helder
Camara, who founded the National Conference of Bishops of Brazil and is the
patron of the Brazilian Catholic Left, is in process
of sainthood in the Vatican.
The
Plínio Corrêa de Oliveira Institute, a Brazilian Catholic institution known for
its conservative stances, also disputed the exaggerated conclusions in Pacepa’s
book, by posting the article titled “Liberation
Theology, a KGB Invention? That Is Way Too Simple... ”
To
say, as Pacepa said, that the KGB created Liberation Theology equates saying
that CIA created the Pentecostal and charismatic movements, even though some
very radical Catholics declare just so. During the Cold War, the KGB supported
sectors in the Catholic Church connected to Liberation Theology while CIA
supported conservative Pentecostal movements that were opposed to Liberation
Theology. See my article “The
Religious War between CIA and KGB in Latin America.” I have attended
Pentecostal and charismatic churches. Does it mean that I am CIA child? By no
means.
Prominent
Catholic website National Catholic Register, in an article written by the
Catholic journalist Victor Gaetan, rebutted Pacepa and his book by showing that
there is disinformative content in his declarations. See the article “Disinformation”
and a Dubious Source.
Catholic
theologian Malachi Martin shows several Catholic ecclesiastical leaders who,
before the KGB’s birth, promoted Liberation Theology.
The
big challenge, therefore, is to read Pacepa’s book knowing how to distinguish
between what is real and imaginary, filtrating what seems showy and impossible
to prove. It is suspicious, for example, the fact that Pacepa is praised by CIA
— a praise cheerfully recorded in his book. Opposition to the KGB, for a
conservative, does not mean automatic support to CIA. To receive praises from
CIA (headed today by a Muslim), or from the KGB, is a disadvantage, making the
praised individual worthy of mistrust.
Is Modern Islamic Terror a KGB Creation?
According
to information
from WND itself, which published originally the Pacepa book, the
U.S. government secretly sent many supplies of weapons to Syrian rebels
(largely Islamic terrorists connected to al-Qaeda) who have been raping,
torturing and slaughtering Christians in Syria. CIA
played a major role in this scheme. In fact, WND accuses Hillary
Clinton of having helped create
ISIS, which has slaughtered thousands of Christians in the Middle
East.
Besides,
it is known that CIA gave billions of dollars to create al-Qaeda in the late
1970s, in a scheme to strengthen and use Islamic terror to overturn the Soviet
Union. But the scheme was turned upside down when one of the CIA Islamic agents,
Saudi Osama bin Laden, for some reason rebelled himself against the U.S. CIA
and its former agent played a crucial role in the strengthening of the modern
Islamic terror. But Pacepa seems to ignore all of this, even though
he presents himself as an expert on Islamic terror. He insists in attributing 100
percent blame on the KGB.
I
examined his book “Disinformation” and I did not find any criticism of CIA and
no mention of the fact that CIA had and has undeniable participation in the
modern Islamic terror. In fact, the
current CIA director is a Muslim, having converted to this murderous
religion when he was in Saudi Arabia. Even so, to CIA Pacepa has in store only
praises; to the KGB, criticism. Why not, for fairness, criticize both?
In “Disinformation,”
Pacepa tells that his protection, identity and other personal issues are under CIA
responsibility. The introduction of his book was written by James Woolsey, a former
CIA director. In this point, some could question if the Pacepa book denounces disinformation
or is a tool of disinformation.
By
following his own exaggerated conclusions, Pacepa has more than enough reasons
to say that the U.S.
presidential candidate Donald Trump is a “KGB agent.”
In
fact, a former
CIA director has said just so. He also said that he is going to vote
for pro-Islam Hillary Clinton and he praised the fact that since 9/11 the CIA’s
Counterterrorism Center was headed by a Muslim for over ten years. The current
CIA director is Muslim. Former U.S. President George H.W. Bush, also a former
CIA director, said that he is going to vote for Hillary.
If this
scandal were connected to KGB, Pacepa would be exposing it and yelling.
Why his
silence?
Portuguese version of this
article: Ion
Mihai Pacepa e desinformação
Source: Last Days Watchman
Recommended Reading:
Posts
