Interview with Don Hank: Interpreting What is Happening in the U.S., Europe and Russia today
By Julio
Severo
As an American
conservative evangelical who speaks and reads Russian and several European and
Asian languages, Don Hank is uniquely able to explain the major challenges and
dangers to the U.S., Europe and Russia.
In this
interview, he will help international and especially Brazilian readers to
understand what is happening to these cultures that have Christian traditions.
Don has a
special concern for Christians being persecuted, raped and slaughtered as a
result of misguided and malevolent geopolitical policies from the Western
powers. He has written a number of articles in support of these persecuted
Christians.
He has had a
special connection to two of his Brazilian friends. When PayPal, under pressure
of a campaign of a major gay group in the U.S., shut down my account, Don
denounced this abuse in an article that was headlined at WND, titled “PayPal blacklists Christian writer.”
Another
Brazilian helped by Don was philosopher Olavo de Carvalho. The first time any
writing of Carvalho’s appeared in WND was through Don’s translation.
In fact, I got
to know Don Hank through Carvalho. Both were very special and supportive in my
times of persecution from homosexual activists.
The epic war
involving massive homosexual and Islamic forces has hit the U.S., Europe and
Russia in an extraordinary way. So, I have invited Don to speak to
us about what he knows, because he is very familiar with these three
cultures.
JULIO SEVERO: In view of the fact that the greatest
threat to the world and specially Christians is Islam, why are the U.S. and
Russia, both Christian nations, fighting each other, instead fighting Islam?
DON HANK:
The
answer to that goes so far outside our comfort zone and our normalcy bias
barrier that many Westerners will refuse to believe it. But here it is for
those who are willing to consider my interpretation:
The US is not Christian in the same sense as Russia.
In the US, the Left has waged a war on Christianity that has left US Christians
debilitated and unable to resist. A salient example is the way in which our
people, including many Christians, have been subjugated to the politically
correct doctrine that the Biblical ban on homosexual behavior is outdated and
‘homophobic.’ This politically correct doctrine is almost impossible to resist
because the average American either accepts it or is afraid to resist it, and
many others are disposed to insult or belittle anyone who expresses the
opposite viewpoint. There is also an official trend to enact and enforce laws
that punish Christians or others who oppose the concept of ‘gay marriage.’ Many
churches accept this un-Biblical doctrine and some have pastors who are openly
‘gay.’ In Russia, there are no legal or social restraints against accepting or
expressing the biblical and common-sense viewpoint that homosexuality is
abnormal. Almost all Russian churches accept the Biblical view of
homosexuality.
So in summary, both the government and the people of
Russia are closer in their views to Christianity as it is taught in the Bible.
Christianity in pure form is not an ideology. I define ideology essentially as
that which falls outside common sense, and the Russians, thank God, still allow
themselves to be guided by common sense. By the way, Putin, in a recent
interview, said he does not have an ideology. He describes himself as a
conservative and a pragmatist but insisted that these are not ideologies. In
other words, in plain language, Russia is, ironically, a Christian country in
truth while America is a Christian country in name. Or more precisely, the US
is quickly becoming a non-Christian country guided by an ideology that can
roughly be called Westernism, or Western liberalism. This ideology has many
facets, such as a virulent form of secularism that is actually anti-Christian
while pretending to be neutral; Russophobia (a kind of racism, similar to
Hitler’s anti-Semitism, teaching, for example, that Russia is morally inferior
to the West, a teaching that draws its support from the residual Cold War
sentiments of many Americans who obtain most of their information from the mass
media); the doctrine of American exceptionalism, which gives the US military
the privilege to invade any country that opposes the US, and the
now-meaningless concepts of ‘freedom’ and ‘democracy,’ which in real terms,
mean just the opposite of what they suggest; and a New World Order concept of a
world divided into several easily controllable regions, one of which would be
Muslim and would be dominated by sharia law. (This regionalism would create
hierarchies which the Western oligarchies that created it hope to control. They
give little consideration to the unexpected consequences of such a system,
which could be disastrous for them. This regionalist facet of US policy is the
most dangerous by far and we are just now starting to see the threat that it
poses to all Western peoples because of the Middle East situation. It is hard
to believe, but, while the Western oligarchs possess formidable military
capability, they are ideologically impotent to oppose Islam.
For these reasons, Russia naturally supports
Christians, such as Serbs and Syrian Christians, whereas US policies could
ultimately cause the death and destruction of these Christians if no
counterforce can come into play. The US oligarchs (as distinct from the
American people) are ideologically incapable of allying themselves with Russia
against Islam. In fact, I once wrote an article entitled Washington
DC, the Seat of the Caliphate, which explains why this is so.
JULIO SEVERO: Don, you said, “The US is not Christian
in the same sense as Russia” and “Russia is, ironically, a Christian country in
truth while America is a Christian country in name.” I agree with you that the
Russian Orthodox Church, which knows how to preserve its traditions, is doing
better than the U.S. mainline denominations as the Presbyterian Church, the
Lutheran Church and other traditional Protestant churches. The basic mission of
a traditional church is to preserve its Christian traditions. And Christianity
has no tradition of supporting the killing of unborn babies and other innocents
and likewise no tradition of supporting gay “marriage” and other facets of the
gay agenda. Why does a high number of traditional Protestant churches in
America accept these aberrations and the Orthodox Church in Russia does not? In
this sense, traditional Christianity in Russia is doing better than traditional
Christianity in America. But I am from the charismatic/Pentecostal variety, and
in my view many Americans in this variety are doing much better, as far as I
know, than Russians. For example, Russia has no David Wilkerson or Jack Deere. In
fact, the most
important American attending a recent pro-life event in Moscow is a
member of the Assemblies of God. Let us ask other question:
William Murray has said that Saudi Arabia is the greatest
financier of global Islamic terrorism. Besides, Saudi Arabia actively murders
homosexuals, bans Christianity and persecutes and tortures Christians. Why
doesn’t the U.S., which is the most important ally of Saudi Arabia and an
active promoter of global gay rights, ever condemns them over their execution
of homosexuals, but has condemned Russia over a mere law banning homosexual
propaganda to minors?
DON HANK:
The
US is now in the hands of a small group of oligarchs who are anti-Christian.
For them Russia’s law banning homosexual propaganda is not a “mere” law, it is
a declaration of war on Westernism, which, though an ideology, is actually
becoming a religion in the eyes of these power-hungry oligarchs, who viscerally
hate anyone who opposes them… not unlike all fascists. Homosexuality is one of
the pillars of this religion, one of its sacred tenets. The irony of US
policies is, as you point out, Julio, that they support two mutually exclusive
teachings: the homosexual agenda and Islam. For them, this is not a problem
because the end justifies the means. The secret that only a few observers have
articulated is that both Islam and the homosexual agenda are anti-Christian.
Incredibly, then, Westernism has embraced these two teachings only for the
purpose of destroying Christianity. Russia, of course, opposes both, and for
that reason, Russia today is the only world power that is capable of defending
Christians and Christianity.
JULIO SEVERO: Why is the U.S. so soft on Saudi Arabia,
which murders homosexuals, and so hard on Russia that does not murder them?
DON HANK:
Well,
if the US government were really concerned about homosexuals, it would not
promote Islamization as it does. Likewise, if it really were concerned about
supporting Islam, it would not promote the homosexual agenda. The only
explanation left for this inconsistent behavior — the default explanation — is
that the US is interested primarily in destroying Christian culture, and for
that reason it supports the idea of a caliphate. Saudi Arabia supports the
founding of a caliphate, which is part of the New World Order concept of a
world divided into regions that are easily controllable by Western oligarchs.
Again, the oligarchs see Russia as lawless because it does not obey the West,
and especially the US, which the oligarchs see as a law unto itself. It does
not obey either God’s laws or man’s laws. It writes its own laws for its own
convenience. Ironically, Russia has pointed out that it acts in accordance with
international law while the US makes a mockery of international law. This is
evident in a Russian televised interview with Foreign Minister Lavrov, which I
have translated.
JULIO SEVERO: There is no doubt that the gay agenda
and the Islamic agenda are ideologies of tyranny. How do the U.S. and Russia
react domestically to these threats?
DON HANK:
An
expert on Russian policy, who was a retired professional analyst in the Russian
government, once said in a private email to a group in which I was included,
that Putin, shortly after his election, dealt with the Chechen Muslim
insurgents by sending one of his generals to Chechnya with an overwhelming
military force. The general told the imam of each town that they must
surrender. He said if they surrendered peacefully, they would be spared. If
they did not, the town would be destroyed. He kept his promise. Putin is
severely criticized by the West for this policy, just as Assad is criticized
for being tough on terrorists. Yet by the inaction of Western leaders, we are
witnessing daily violence in the Middle East and even a growing jihadism in the
West. We need to understand that inaction is more devastating in the long run
than dealing harshly with murderers.
As for the homosexual agenda, Putin’s government has
managed to enact and enforce laws that prohibit gay propaganda. Russia has
jailed a group of women, Pussy Riot, who illegally entered and desecrated a
church. The reason for Putin’s success is that, despite Western accusations
that he is a tyrant, his government is much more democratic than the US
government in the sense that the Russian people do not want to have
pro-homosexual policies and propaganda foisted on them, and his policies
respect the people’s will. In contrast, the US oligarchs in government and in
NGOs, must overcome the will of the people in order to foist gay “marriage on
us”. Everything is backward. The once-leftist Russia is now the most socially
and economically conservative world power, while the once-conservative USA is
now very radical and leftwing.
JULIO SEVERO: How did the U.S. come to have a
president who is simultaneously pro-Islam and pro-sodomy?
DON HANK:
In
my opinion, Julio, Obama is not really as much pro-Islam or pro-sodomy as he is
pro-Western liberalism, which is essentially the same as neoconservatism. He is
only using Islam and the homosexual agenda to impose the West’s will on the
rest of the world. And he is not acting alone. He is simply running along with
the central Westernist secular ideology.
JULIO SEVERO: Ronald Reagan successfully created the
Mexico City Policy, which banned, in his time, the U.S. government from funding
abortion overseas. But he was unsuccessful in defeating Roe vs. Wade.
Similarly, the current more conservative Russian government has successfully
championed the fight against abortion in the U.N. system, but domestically it
has only restricted it and banned its propaganda. What do you think about these
conservative parallels?
DON HANK:
I
think Putin is a conservative in his heart, but like Reagan, he is a pragmatist
who knows the limits of his power. Putin is already making major changes in the
abortion rate and, unlike Reagan, he has both a moral reason and an economic
reason for opposing abortion. The birth rate is too low to be sustainable. If
any country ever bans abortion, I think it will be Russia.
JULIO SEVERO: On a larger scale, old Christian
churches in Europe have been transformed in mosques. On a smaller scale, the
same is happening in America. In contrast, Russia is rebuilding Christian
churches and banning the construction of mosques in Moscow. Is the European and
American case an example of “democracy” or suicide? Are Russians trying to stop
the massive Islamic “invasion” that is transforming the European and American
cultural and religious landscape?
DON HANK:
Europe
and America are both capitulating gradually to Islam and there is little
evidence that the leaders of these regions will stop until they have been
completely Islamized. The only signs of an awakening to the dangers are the
rapidly growing political parties in the UK, Holland and France, which are
making great strides in educating the public of the Muslim threat. The US has
not had enough first-hand experience with Islam to oppose it forcefully, and of
course, the Obama administration actually has Muslims in high places in
government. It is widely believed that John Brennan, the head of the CIA, is a Muslim.
That is a very ominous sign. So the answer to your question as to whether we
are democracy or suicide, I would have to say we are headed for suicide,
ironically, as a result of our obsession with democracy, though with the caveat
that our “democracy” is not representative of the people’s will. A recent joint
study between Northwestern and Princeton Universities
showed unequivocally that the US is more of an oligarchy than a democracy.
As for Russia, while the central government has been
careful to avoid confrontation with Islam, local areas and cities have, as you mentioned,
taken serious measures to halt the advance of Islam, including banning mosque
construction in several cities and in Moscow, refusing to issue a permit for a
demonstration against ‘Islamophobia.’
JULIO SEVERO: Many people talk about Russia without
understanding its language, culture and traditions. Is this your case? What do
you know about Russia?
DON HANK:
I
hold a Master’s degree in Russian language and literature and have studied at
the University of Leningrad (now Petersburg). I read Russian language articles
as often as I can. It is almost impossible to understand what is really
happening in Russia without looking at the Russian viewpoint. My Russophobe
friends insist that almost everything that the Russians say is mere propaganda.
However, it must be pointed out that Russia is no longer a monolithic
government. I believe you, Julio, pointed out in a recent commentary that
Moscow Times has an anti-government viewpoint. Therefore, no one can truthfully
say that all news from Russia is propaganda.
There is also one very important reason why I see
Russia differently from many other Americans, including conservative
Christians. I have had considerable exposure to Russian literature and
recognize in Putin’s words and actions the distinct influence of Russian
Christian thought. Christian authors that I have read in Russian include
Dostoyevsky and Tolstoy, whose Christian thoughts are expressed and illustrated
in Putin’s words and deeds. Likewise, Putin has had friendly relations with
Alexander Solzhenitsyn, a man whose writings reflected religious thought at a
time when such was strictly forbidden by the communists (but without
necessarily declaring himself to be a Christian). It is very difficult for
Westerners with little or no exposure to Russian literature to correctly
evaluate Vladimir Putin.
JULIO SEVERO: American ultranationalists as Cliff
Kincaid believe that Putin is being influenced by an ideology called
“Eurasianism,” which was set forth by the philosopher Alexander Dugin. In fact,
he said that Dugin is an adviser to Putin. What is your opinion on this?
DON HANK:
Julio,
russophobia is now a cottage industry in America and the hacks who work in it
are paid to give speeches and write books that essentially keep the cold war
warm. None of the ones I know of, including Kincaid, have an extensive
knowledge of Russian culture, literature or language and they do not read the
Russian language press. It is impossible to be an authority on Russia without
this background.
I know that many people here in the Western world have
been told by anti-Russia critics that Alexander Dugin is a “mentor” of Putin.
That is not true. Dugin is a very clever man who wants power for himself and
has made desperate attempts to ingratiate himself with Putin. Dugin never
really understood Putin. After Dugin made that crazy speech in a televised
interview urging people to “kill, kill, kill” (the Ukrainians), many Russians
demanded that Dugin be fired from his post as professor. Indeed, he was fired,
and significantly, Putin did not object to this. Indeed, Putin has said
repeatedly in interviews that the Russians and Ukrainians are brothers. He
wants conciliation and he wants Russians to respect other peoples. Dugin
was stupid to say what he did. Dugin later foolishly blamed Putin for not
coming to his aid. Obviously, this man is an egotist who has no influence on
Putin whatsoever, and I doubt he ever did. Putin was recently interviewed by
Russian media and was asked what his ideology was. Putin said he had no
ideology at all and that he was a conservative and a pragmatist. This was a
strong signal to the public that he was not in any way tied to Dugin and would
not be swayed by his ideology.
JULIO
SEVERO: Thanks, Don. If Russia followed the U.S. free speech
model, Dugin would never be fired, because thousands of American professors
proclaim nonsense and even murders (especially of unborn babies) and go
unfired. In fact, the fad today in the U.S. is to fire only professors who
speak out against abortion and homosexuality. So it is very interesting that in
the Russian model, Dugin was fired. Now, another question:
A few days ago, the
Kremlin hosted an international forum on large families and the future of
humanity. Originally, the World Congress on Families was
scheduled to hold its big pro-family event at the Kremlin. But leftist and
homosexual groups successfully pressed the U.S. government to ban Christian and
conservative groups from attending it. So the World Congress on Families had to
comply under this massive negative pressure. What is the power today of U.S.
gay and leftist groups to stop the freedom of Christian and conservative
groups? Why haven’t other great U.S. conservative groups denounced it? On the
contrary, gay activists in the U.S. trashed the Moscow event. The U.S. leftist
group PFAW (People for the American Way), which
attacked me some weeks ago, also trashed the event. In fact, American ultranationalists
as Cliff Kincaid trashed it too. Even the secular Russian newspaper The Moscow
Times, following the secular U.S. media, trashed the event, using basically the
same words of Kincaid, saying that the Russian speakers were “corrupt” and
accusing the American and the international participants of being “neo-cons.”
This was the first time in my life I was accused of being a neocon. How do you
interpret this strange “alliance” against the pro-family event in Moscow?
DON HANK:
First
of all, Julio, I want to heartily congratulate you for being able to attend
that conference. I believe that God was with you in opening up the hearts of
your readers to donate so generously to enable you to make this trip. It is
incredible that the government of a “Christian” nation could allow itself to be
pressured to ban your entering the Kremlin. What a wonderful and historically
educational visit that would have been! I can’t tell you exactly why
conservative groups have not complained about this absurd ban, but I do have a
theory. Ever since web sites started publishing my articles about Putin and
Russia, I have been receiving some emails from groups that I call “professional
Russophobes,” activists who support the neocon view of Russia and are paid for
speaking engagements and for writing books that denigrate Russia. This is
little more than prostitution of their talents. Russophobia is racism, just
like anti-Semitism. Both imply a fear and/or hatred of an ethnic group, which
they consider morally, intellectually or otherwise inferior, while considering
themselves superior. Jesus warned against this self-righteousness in his
parable of the Pharisee and the tax collector praying in the Temple.
Unfortunately, many Western Christians are also Russophobes, and this is a sign
of spiritual blindness — the same kind of spiritual blindness that prevents
Christians from effectively defending their faith against Islamization and the
encroachment of the homosexual agenda. Only a spiritually blind person could
possibly fail to see how Russia today is defending Christianity against both
Islam and the homosexual agenda.
The Moscow Times is anti-Putin. The accusation of you
being a neocon is beyond absurd. These people have no idea what a neocon is.
Today's neocons are anti-Russian. There is a very strong anti-Putin movement in
Russia and it consists mostly of what they call Westerners, who want to align
themselves with the West. This dichotomy between Slavophiles and Westernizers
goes back to the 1800s in Russia. The difference between these movements can
best be understood by reading Turgenev's novella Nest of Noblefolk (it is
available as a movie online. I highly recommend it to movie buffs who like
classics). It is hard to believe, but the Westernizers are still active today
and want a Russia that is closer in ideology to Europe and the US.
JULIO SEVERO: Some American pro-family leaders were
very courageous and attended the Moscow conservative meeting. Now the Human
Rights Campaign, the most important U.S. gay group, wants the State Department
to investigate them. Is there a Gaystapo (a gay oppressive surveillance machine
with state assistance) in America? Why don’t homosexual activists in Russia
have the same “freedom” and apparatus to be a Gaystapo against Christians?
DON HANK:
Julio,
I like your word “Gaystapo” because it perfectly describes many gay activists
and the state apparatus that protects them while persecuting Christians who
dare to call homosexual behavior sin. I once regularly attended a church where
the pastor taught the biblical view of homosexuality. There was a rebellious
boy from a local seminary who occasionally attended with this pastor’s son.
Once as the pastor was preaching about homosexuality, this boy jumped up from
his seat and ran out the door, followed by the pastor’s son. It was a bizarre
display but I suspected what was behind it.
A few weeks later, after this pastor had again
preached the biblical view of homosexuality, the pastor’s home was torched and
burned to the ground. Police investigators found that the fire was the result
of arson, but no one was able to locate the perpetrators. Suffice to say that
gay activists who portray themselves as victims are anything but victims.
JULIO SEVERO: Scott Lively, who is the greatest
Christian authority today on the gay agenda, has said that possibly the Obama
administration may have used the Ukrainian crisis to attack the Russian stance
against the gay agenda. Before this crisis, all the U.S. media were
consistently and increasingly attacking Russia over its law banning homosexual
propaganda to children. In contrast, in the March
cover story of Decision magazine, Franklin Graham praised the Russian
government for this law and for stances more favorable to Christians. Do you
believe that the Obama administration and neocons, who provoked the Ukrainian
crisis, used it to draw away the attention from the Russian conservative
measures?
DON HANK:
Westernism,
or Western liberalism, is a religion. From what I have observed, its followers
are true believers, absolute fanatics who will stop at nothing to assert their
goals. Julio, I therefore believe that you are right and that the Ukrainian
crisis was indeed used for this purpose, but also to enforce the Wolfowitz
doctrine, which demands that Russia must be contained and isolated from the
former Soviet republics. This isolation is absolutely unfair in itself, but the
association agreement between the Ukraine and the EU is a direct provocation of
Russia. This agreement makes it illegal for Ukraine to trade bilaterally with
Russia without the permission of the EU, and according to the Russians, this
ban will cost Russia billions of dollars in lost trade. The EU (European Union)
is a failed pseudo-state that is bringing nothing but misery to its members.
Most of the northern members in Europe no longer wish to be part of the EU, but
their leaders have betrayed them by denying them a referendum that would enable
them to be sovereign again. I believe that the EU will eventually fall, and
with it, so will the US. Both of these entities are nothing but dictatorships
and have lost all legitimacy. It makes me sad to say this because I am an
American. But it looks as if the America I was born in is not the America that
I will die in. If it were not for my faith in God, I don’t know if I could
stand the pain of seeing my country fall so far from grace. But my allegiance
is to God Almighty and to Jesus Christ His Son, not to any country. Ronald Reagan
once said: “I did not abandon the Democrat Party. It abandoned me.” Likewise I
say that I did not abandon my country. It abandoned me.
JULIO SEVERO: Who are the neoconservatives, or
neocons? Are they helpful or not to the Christian conservative movement? What
is the power of neocons?
DON HANK:
The
term neocon describes in reality a group of powerful politicians and their
enablers who simply pretend to be conservative but are left leaning promoters
of a New World Order, or one world socialist government that, if it comes into
being, will be a platform for the US oligarchs and their allies in banking and
geopolitics to rule the world according to the doctrine of Western liberalism.
Obviously, these people are not at all helpful to Christians. While they pretend
to support fairness, democracy and “freedom,” one of their main goals is the
destruction of Western civilization. They want to eliminate the borders around
the US just as the EU has eliminated the borders around its member countries,
which, as a result, are now bursting at the seams with hostile Muslims who
threaten them with jihad. It is a desperate situation that, according to my
European friends, will one day surely lead to civil war.
The power of the neocons in geopolitics is almost
unlimited, or rather it is limited almost exclusively by Russia in
the international sphere and by a few brave conservatives in the national
sphere. People like you, Julio, who are not afraid to tell the truth and expose
them.
The reason
they are so powerful is that their policies and their ideology pervade both
major political parties in the US and also extend to NATO and the EU.
Essentially, the neocons first emerged within the Republican Party but their
ideas in foreign policy have extended to the Democrat Party as well. A perfect
example of this is Victoria Nuland, Assistant Secretary of State for European
and Eurasian Affairs. Nuland’s husband is historian Robert Kagan, Council
on Foreign Relations member, and co-founder of the think-tank “Project
for the New American Century” (PNAC). The CFR is a carrier of the idea that
borders must be eliminated in order to pave the way for a one world government.
The fact that Kagan was an advisor to both Republicans and Democrats clearly
illustrates how neocons cross party lines. This is why it seems meaningless for
many people to vote for a candidate of either party, since both parties accept
neocon policies that invariably lead to the destruction of Christians
communities.
JULIO SEVERO: How have America, Europe and Russia,
with their Christian traditions, capitulated to the Islamic and homosexual
ideologies?
DON HANK:
The
elites of Europe and America have abandoned Christianity. Christian traditions
mean nothing to them. Russia is the only world power that embraces Christianity
(and this is not just a political trick. It fully reflects Russian Christian
thought as expressed in the 19th Century literature. The EU and the USA are
failing. The economies of these two entities are no longer sustainable in the
long run, since they operate on the basis of debt, not on any sound business or
banking principles. They are both in their late stage of existence, a stage
where the only strategy left for them is to issue currency. But issuing
currency to pay debts is like adding water to the soup when new guests arrive.
Once too many guests have arrived, the soup no longer is soup. It is just water
with a few vegetables floating around in it. Zimbabwe and the Weimar Republic of
Germany, for example, failed as a result of this policy.
To make matters worse for the US in particular, the
Russians and their BRICS partners, including Brazil, are starting to
de-dollarize international commercial transactions, basing them on rubles or
yuan, for example. Once this strategy has advanced to a certain level, the
dollar will have lost so much of its value that it will be almost worthless.
JULIO SEVERO: How could America, Europe and Russia,
with their Christian traditions, work together to defeat the Islamic and
homosexual ideology?
DON HANK:
At
some point, because of the failed policies, the US will depend on Russia and
China almost completely, and at that point, the neocons will lose their power.
Russians can then demand that the US and even the EU help them fight
Islamization and, if they choose to do so, accept the Russian policies
regarding homosexuality.
But none of this can happen without God’s intervention.
We must all just wait and see….and pray.
Julio, thank you very much for this opportunity. I
wish you and your readers all the best and I pray that God will continue to
richly bless you all.
Portuguese
version of this interview: Entrevista
com Don Hank: Interpretando o que está acontecendo com os EUA, Europa e Rússia
hoje
Source: Last Days Watchman
Article
by Don Hank:
No comments :
Post a Comment