Wednesday, June 19, 2019

Taylor Swift Music Video Attacks People Who Protest Against LGBTQ Behavior, But Refrains from Condemning Islamic Nations that Execute Homosexuals


Taylor Swift Music Video Attacks People Who Protest Against LGBTQ Behavior, But Refrains from Condemning Islamic Nations that Execute Homosexuals

By Julio Severo
The rainbow-clad music video for Taylor Swift’s latest single, “You Need to Calm Down,” is a homage to the LGBTQ agenda and attacks those who protest against the LGBTQ behavior.
Taylor Swift music vídeo portraying Christians protesting against sodomy as bigots
Swift hinted the song would serve as something of an anthem for the LGBTQ activism.
Filled with celebrities like daytime TV host Ellen DeGeneres, actor Ryan Reynolds, transgender actor Laverne Cox, pop star Katy Perry, and the cast of Netflix’s “Queer Eye,” the music video portrayed those who protest against the LGBTQ agenda as half-witted, hateful rednecks with placard about Adam and Eve.
The song’s lyrics include lines like: “And control your urges to scream about all the people you hate, ’cause shade never made anybody less gay.”
Obviously, Swift is addressing Christians, whom she misrepresents as ill-humored individuals who do nothing except to protest against the homosexual agenda.
Yet, she does not attack Muslim nations that waste no time protesting against the gay agenda, preferring instead to execute homosexuals. Saudi Arabia is one of these nations.
She could argue that it is not her business to mind issues of far-away nations. But Saudi Arabia is not, economically at least, away from the U.S. On the contrary, Saudi investments touch virtually everything in America.
The Saudi central bank is sitting on an incredible $584 billion of foreign currency reserves, but doesn’t disclose how much of that is parked in U.S. Treasuries.
Saudi Arabia threatened to sell off American assets if Congress passes a bill that would allow 9/11 victims to sue foreign governments. So the U.S. government cannot allow American citizens to sue Saudi Arabia for Saudi terrorism.
America is tied up to Saudi Arabia.
A CBS News report headline said, “Corporate America’s deep ties to Saudi Arabia.”
A CNN report headline said, “Saudi Arabia’s money ties to the U.S. are massive...and murky.”
A Quartz report headline said, “Silicon Valley is awash with Saudi Arabian money.”
The big difference between Christians who protest against the gay agenda and Islamic Saudis who execute homosexuals is that Saudis have billions and billions and billions of dollars. Christian demonstrators against the gay agenda do not have billions of dollars.
So is it hard to understand why Taylor Swift is not busy against Islamic Saudis who execute homosexuals, but very busy against Christians?
If Swift treated Saudis the way she has treated Christians in her music video, the Saudi reprisals would be fast.
If she does not accept Christians who do not accept homosexual depravity, she should target George Washington, the first U.S. president. He never executed homosexuals, but he discharged dishonorably from the Army a soldier who committed sodomy (homosexual acts).
Swift would have honored the depraved soldier and disparaged Washington. I would have honored Washington and his noble decision.
If Swift is so courageous about advocating homosexuality, why not attack forcefully Saudi executions of homosexual and demand a ban on Saudi investments in the U.S.?
With information from CBN News and CNN.
Recommended Reading:

Monday, June 17, 2019

Brazil’s Supreme Court criminalizes “homophobia,” making discriminatory acts and views against homosexuals a crime like racism


Brazil’s Supreme Court criminalizes “homophobia,” making discriminatory acts and views against homosexuals a crime like racism

By Julio Severo
Brazil’s supreme court officially forged “homophobia” and “transphobia” as crimes similar to racism on June 13, 2019. Eight of 11 justices voted to treat “homophobia” in the same way as racism under Brazilian law, making it a criminal act as racism.
The big homosexualist advance in Brazil made headlines in major U.S. and international newspapers, including:
Reuters: “Brazil Supreme Court rules homophobia a crime.”
Associated Press: “Brazil’s supreme court votes to make homophobia a crime.”
The Wall Street Journal: “Brazil’s Supreme Court Criminalizes Homophobic Acts.”
USAToday: “Brazil's Supreme Court criminalizes homophobia and transphobia.”
The Daily Beast: “Brazil’s Supreme Court Votes to Criminalize Homophobia.”
Racism was made a crime in Brazil in 1989 with prison sentences of up to five years. The Supreme Court’s judges ruled that “homophobia” should be framed within the racism law.
“Homophobic crimes are as alarming as physical violence,” Supreme Court Vice-President Luiz Fux said on his vote, citing “epidemic levels of homophobic violence.”
This definition of violence encompasses not only acts but also views. “Every preconception is violence,” said justice Carmen Lucia. So a Christian advocating the Bible teaching that homosexual acts are sin would be seen as an individual with a “religious preconception.”
The Oxford Dictionary defines “preconception” as “an idea or opinion formed prior to having evidence for its truth or usefulness.” In this case, the provider of the evidence of “truth” is the State and any view, biblical or otherwise, not conforming the state view is “preconception.”
In the Brazilian law of racism, any view or a single word calling a black individual of “Negro” is liable of legal punishment. So if the anti-“homophobia” law is now framed within the racism law, it follows that an individual expressing any negative word about homosexuals will be liable to legal punishment.
The action judged by Brazil’s Supreme Court to make “homophobia” a crime was originally brought by the Socialist Popular Party and the Brazilian Association of Gays, Lesbians and Transgenders (known as ABGLT).
The Socialist Popular Party is behind of the criminalization of “homophobia” in Brazil because it is just natural for socialists to seek to criminalize the main threat to socialism: Bible-believing Christians.
ABGLT is also behind of the criminalization of “homophobia” in Brazil because it has for many years persecuted Bible-believing Christians who have never harmed any homosexuals, but have defended what the Bible says: that homosexual acts are abomination in God’s sight and that homosexual will not inherit God’s Kingdom.
In 2011 ABGLT filed a complaint to federal prosecutors against Brazilian Pentecostal televangelist Silas Malafaia, the most prominent evangelical leader in Brazil, for “inciting violence against LGBT people.” ABGLT’s interpretation of “inciting violence against LGBT people” is to preach against the homosexual sin and oppose homosexual indoctrination of schoolchildren.
In 2007 ABGLT filed a complaint to federal prosecutors against me, Julio Severo, for “for maintaining a website that incites violence against the LGBT community.”
My blog seeks to inform, in a Christian perspective, the public about homosexual subjects censored by the mainstream media. For example, while Brazil’s Supreme Court was busy criminalizing “homophobia” the mainstream media in Brazil was keeping a blackout on the horrific case of Two Brazilian lesbians who stabbed a boy one year after cutting off his sex organ to make him a “girl.”
The Brazilian media is silent. ABGLT and other homosexualist groups are silent. What I am supposed to do? To be silent to be an accomplice of their evil silence? Yet, when I expose this and other horrific cases of homosexual violence against children I am accused of “inciting violence against LGBT people.”
The federal prosecution against me only did not advance because I left Brazil in 2009 just when prosecutors were summoning for their hearings the man responsible for the domain of my website to give them my location to advance their action.
So the “homophobia” law in Brazil is based on socialism and on a gay group that has a history of persecuting evangelical leaders, including me. Such law will certainly target Christians like me, because it is a law produced to serve ideological groups at their own requests. More convenient than this, impossible.
BBC said, “For almost 20 years there have been efforts to make homophobia a crime in Brazil, but legislation on the matter has faced resistance among conservative and religious groups in Congress.” My book “O Movimento Homossexual” (The Homosexual Movement), published in 1998 by the Brazilian branch of Bethany House Publishers, was used by evangelical congressmen on the floor of the Brazilian Congress. “The Homosexual Movement” was the first book published against the homosexual movement in Brazil and prepared prophetically the Christian Church in Brazil for the coming homosexualist assault on the Christian free speech.
Incredibly, the Supreme Court’s judges said their ruling was necessary because homosexuals are legally unprotected.
Homosexual “marriage” was legalized in Brazil in 2013. Even with such privilege, homosexualists and their propaganda machine in the Brazilian mainstream media keep preaching that homosexuals are victims of violence in Brazil and need special protection and more and more privileges.
When reporting on Brazil’s supreme court criminalizing “homophobia,” the Associated Press (AP) said that Brazil “is still a dangerous country for members of the LGBT community and has a large evangelical movement often critical of gay rights.”
So AP suggested that there is a link between “danger for homosexuals” and “evangelical criticism of the homosexual agenda.”
Just as the origin of the criminalization of “homophobia” was socialist and homosexualist, the origin in Brazil of the main resistance to socialism and the homosexual agenda is evangelicalism. EuroNews said, “Support from conservative Pentecostal churches helped Bolsonaro to win the election,” regarding Jair Bolsonaro, who was elected especially by evangelicals to defeat a socialist candidate.
Reuters said, “Evangelicals and other socially conservative Brazilians helped Bolsonaro win last year’s election as he promised to overturn years of liberal social policies, including more rights for same-sex couples. Bolsonaro [is] a Catholic who was baptized by an evangelical pastor on a trip to Israel three years ago.”
Even though is internationally recognized that Bolsonaro had his victory thanks to conservative evangelicals, he has nominated for his administration especially individuals from a fringe esoteric right-wing group that is misleading many Catholics, some evangelicals and particularly Bolsonaro himself.
On June 14, 2019, Bolsonaro told reporters the Supreme Court was “completely wrong” in criminalizing “homophobia” and had overstepped its powers, moving into legislative territory. He added that such criminalization would hurt homosexuals because an employer would “think twice” before hiring a gay person for fear of being accused of “homophobia.”
According to EuroNews, “Congress has a conservative majority under the influence of the Evangelical Church.” In fact, most of the Brazilian conservative congressmen are evangelicals, who traditionally are in Brazilian politics in the forefront of the pro-family resistance against abortion and the homosexual agenda.
Euronews is right. Many times, I worked in the backstage with Brazilian congressmen to stop homosexualist bills. Since 2003, for example, I was an informal adviser to the president of the Evangelical Parliamentary Caucus.
Eventually, the “homophobia” law will treat as “crime” any critical view of homosexual acts and propaganda, because if it is a racial crime to criticize others because of their skin color, why would not be a “homophobic” crime to criticize homosexual behaviors?
Several U.S. and international newspapers used as their only reference source the Grupo Gay of Bahia (Gay Group of Bahia, a Brazilian homosexualist group) to explain that the “homophobia” law is necessary to protect homosexuals from violence.
The Associated Press report said,
“According to the rights group the Grupo Gay da Bahia, 420 LGBT people were killed across Brazil in 2018, while at least 141 have been killed so far this year.”
BBC, the Daily Beast, USAToday and EuroNews also mentioned the Grupo Gay da Bahia and its statistics.
For them, less than 500 deaths a year is enough reason to criminalize “homophobia.”
Now, because the Associated Press, BBC, the Daily Beast, USAToday and EuroNews did their reports without doing their homework, let us show the facts on violence in Brazil. Over 60,000 Brazilians are murdered a year in Brazil. Homosexuals are less than 1 percent of the massive count of violence. How then should they get more privileges if the general population in Brazil suffers an explosive rate of murders?
Of course, the Associated Press, BBC, the Daily Beast, USAToday and EuroNews reports had no concern about the epidemic of homosexual violence against children. The case of the 9-year-old boy castrated, tortured and beheaded by two lesbians is ignored by the mainstream media. Are reporters afraid of being accused of “homophobia” if they mention homosexual violence against children?
The main cause of murders of homosexuals in Brazil is the irrational passion of a lover of the victim. Murdered homosexuals are mostly transvestites, according to Oswaldo Braga, president of the Gay Movement of Minas, who declared, “They are homosexuals that are more involved in criminality, as prostitution and drug trafficking, being more exposed to violence.” (Tribuna de Minas, 09/03/2007, page 3.)
Luiz Mott, the founder of the Grupo Gay da Bahia (Gay Group of Bahia) mentioned by the Associated Press, BBC, the Daily Beast, USAToday and EuroNews, does not complain of drug traffickers killing homosexuals. In 2008, as reported by LifeSiteNews, he posted on the Internet the home addresses of Christian pro-family leaders in Brazil. He included my name too. Why didn’t he post the home addresses of drug traffickers? If he had done it, he would be dead by now.
If I had posted on the Internet his home address, he would accuse me of threatening him and I would be jailed. Why isn’t he jailed?
When the Brazilian Association of Gays, Lesbians, Bisexuals, Transvestites and Transsexuals had lodged a criminal complaint to federal prosecutors against me for “homophobia” in 2007, Mott rejoiced then at the news. “We are all proud of the ABGLT for filing charges against our archenemy, Julio Severo,” he was quoted as saying in a Yahoo homosexual email list. “I hope that he is condemned to perpetual imprisonment in Sodom and Gomorrah.”
If I had rejoiced at Mott’s misfortune and said “I hope that he is condemned to perpetual imprisonment in Sodom and Gomorrah,” every Brazilian and international gay group would denounce me for “homophobia.”
So, the main source about violence against homosexuals for the Associated Press, BBC, the Daily Beast, USAToday and EuroNews reports is a homosexual group founded by a homosexualist who does not target drug traffickers who actually kill homosexuals. He targets Christians just like me. Christians who have never killed or even harmed homosexuals. Christians whose only “crime” is to believe and preach God’s Word, where God says that the homosexual sin is an abomination.
How can I doubt that Brazil’s Supreme Court is not criminalizing Christians?
With information from the Associated Press, Reuters, BBC, the Daily Beast, USAToday, EuroNews, Migalhas and Wall Street Journal.
Recommended Reading:
Recommended Reading on the U.S. Left against Julio Severo:
Another Recommended Reading:

Tuesday, June 11, 2019

Trump administration bans gay flag on embassies’ flagpoles, but it does not reverse Trump’s campaign to make homosexuality legal around the world


Trump administration bans gay flag on embassies’ flagpoles, but it does not reverse Trump’s campaign to make homosexuality legal around the world

By Julio Severo
After the backlash of evangelical leaders condemning the declaration of U.S. President Donald Trump endorsing LGBT Pride Month, his administration decided to defuse the bad repercussion by banning the gay flag on the embassies’ flagpoles.
U.S. Embassy in Nepal celebrating Gay Pride Month
Since the left-wing U.S. President Barack Hussein Obama, the gay flag was flown on flagpoles in the U.S. embassies. Even during the Trump administration, the flagpoles had the gay flags.
By the new directive, diplomats are allowed to display the gay symbols and flag elsewhere, including on embassy walls and inside buildings. The only exclusion is the flagpoles. LifeSiteNews said, “the directive appears to be less about rejecting the homosexual agenda than it is about reserving the official flagpole for the nations being represented.”
Several U.S. embassies are finding other ways to show the gay flag.
“The President’s recognition of [Gay] Pride Month and his tweet encouraging our decriminalization campaign gives me even more pride to once again march in the Berlin [Gay] Pride parade, hang a huge banner on the side of the Embassy recognizing our pride, host multiple events at the Embassy and the residence, and fly the gay pride flag,” U.S. Ambassador to Germany Richard Grenell, a homosexual “conservative” married to another homosexual, said. A spokesman for the U.S. Embassy in Germany added, “the pride flag will be on as many places as it can at the Embassy.”
U.S. diplomats at several embassies, including in South Korea and India, have draped LGBT flags over their building facades, while the U.S. ambassador in New Delhi illuminated the building in rainbow lights, and several other ambassadors released photos and videos of staffers themselves demonstrating for homosexual “pride.”
Ambassador Randy Berry, an open homosexual married to another homosexual, tweeted,
“Today, along with the U.S. Mission in Nepal community, I join people around the world in celebrating Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, & Intersex #PrideMonth, and reaffirm the U.S. commitment to defending human rights for all. #Pride2019.”
So Trump’s decision, even though barring the gay flag on flagpoles, does not bars embassies from using their other spaces to celebrate homosexuality.
His decision in no way revokes his declaration endorsing LGBT Pride Month and launching a global campaign to make homosexuality legal around the world.
Trump has a mixed record on LGBT issues. He has defended religious freedom, opposed gender ideology in the military, public schools, and staffed his administration with various pro-family leaders.
On the other hand, Trump has nominated a variety of homosexualist figures to judgeships and other government posts, and continued a number of Obama-era pro-LGBT policies. He also declared after the 2016 election that the Supreme Court’s 2015 Obergefell v. Hodges ruling forcing all fifty states to recognize homosexual “marriage” was “settled law.”
More recently, Trump saw no problem in the open homosexuality of Pete Buttigieg, who is a homosexual married to another homosexual and aspirates to be the first homosexual president of the United States.
This “new” attitude of Trump is barely new. His history reveals a man who always sought to please both sides. For many years he donated to conservative and Christians groups and, at the same time, to homosexualist groups.
Yet, his attempt to please both sides can backfire. In political terms, he gets nothing by compromising to homosexualists. And he can lose everything if he advances his campaign to make homosexuality legal around the world, because his re-election is dependent on evangelicals who do not accept legal sodomy, not on homosexualists who hate him for banning their flag from the embassies’ flagpoles.
Sodomy is reigning so powerfully in the U.S. that even when homosexualists are allowed to put their symbols and flags in all spaces of the U.S. embassies, they will be not happy if they are not given the flagpoles. Christians would rejoice if the U.S. embassies gave to them the freedom to put Christian symbols and flags in all spaces of the U.S. embassies even if not given the flagpoles.
Trump’s decision is not hindering homosexualists from flying their flags on the flagpoles. LGBTQNation run the headline, “Embassies worldwide are defying Trump & flying the Pride flag without permission.”
When left-wing Obama supported the homosexual agenda, he led the world in a very bad example, and he was supported by left-wingers around the world and opposed by conservative Christians.
Now right-wing Trump supports the same agenda and leads the world in the same bad example by launching his campaign to make homosexuality legal around the world. Whether homosexualists and left-wingers will accept or not Trump’s policy of pleasing both sides remains to be seen.
And it remains to be seen also if conservative Christians will oppose or not his effort to make legal what God has clearly condemned.
With information from LifeSiteNews and LBGTQNation.
Recommended Reading:

Friday, June 07, 2019

Israel Celebrates Gay Pride Parade in Jerusalem as Right-Wing Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu Appoints Gay Justice Minister, the First Openly Gay Minister in Israel


Israel Celebrates Gay Pride Parade in Jerusalem as Right-Wing Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu Appoints Gay Justice Minister, the First Openly Gay Minister in Israel

U.S. Embassy in Jerusalem also sent a delegation to the gay parade to show support

By Julio Severo
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu appointed Likud lawmaker Amir Ohana as justice minister on June 5, 2019. Ohana is a right-wing homosexual.
Gay parade in Jerusalem
The appointment came just one day ahead of LGBTQ Pride Parade in Jerusalem.
Netanyahu’s spokesman Yonatan Urich said: “For the first time ever, a member of the LGBT community will be a senior member of the Israeli government.”
MK Idan Roll, who is also gay, congratulated Ohana and said he hopes the new minister will use the post to advance the demands from the LGBT community.
Netanyahu’s appointment of a homosexual as justice minister was a gift to homosexualists and their parade in Jerusalem.
Over 10,000 joined the Gay Pride Parade in Jerusalem on June 6. A sea of rainbow flags flooded Jerusalem’s streets with Israelis and foreigners marching in the 18th annual Gay Pride Parade.
Amir Ohana also attended the event.
Eitan Ginzburg, who is the first openly gay Israeli to serve as a mayor in Israel, also attended it.
The U.S. Embassy in Jerusalem also sent a delegation to the parade to show support and solidarity. Such move follows the new direction of U.S. President Donald Trump to show support for homosexuality around the world.
The problem with Netanyahu appointing the first openly homosexual minister in Israel is that as a right-wing leader he should fight the pro-homosexuality trend clearly promoted by left-wingers. If he wants to promote homosexual cause, why not join the left?
As to the U.S. Embassy in Jerusalem, evangelical leaders and ministers attended its inauguration last year. Certainly, they did it to pray and consecrate it for better relations with Israel, not for better relations with homosexuality. They prayed and consecrated the embassy to support Israel, not to support homosexuality.
Evangelical leaders in the U.S. and around the world enthusiastically support Netanyahu and they prayerfully supported Trump’s decision to move the U.S. Embassy to Jerusalem. Now they should tell to Netanyahu and Trump that they do not agree with government actions to support homosexuality, by Netanyahu appointing a homosexual and by the U.S. Embassy in Jerusalem sending a delegation to support the Gay Pride Parade in Jerusalem.
The big issue for conservative evangelicals is that if they made all effort to fight Obama and other left-wing leaders who showed support for homosexuality, why tolerate this same support from right-wingers?
Evangelicals knew what to do when the Obama administration supported gay parades. But they do not know what to do when they see the Trump administration doing exactly the same thing. They run the risk of seeming inconsistent or even hypocritical for tolerating in Netanyahu and Trump what they never tolerated in Obama.
The right in Israel and the U.S. is corrupting itself. Conservative evangelicals should pray and watch so that the right may not make them fall into temptation.
With information from the Jerusalem Post.
Recommended Reading: