Showing posts with label Conservapedia. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Conservapedia. Show all posts

Friday, December 02, 2016

Conservapedia and the Inquisition


Conservapedia and the Inquisition

By Julio Severo
Conservapedia is an English-language wiki encyclopedia project written from an American conservative, creationist and Christian point of view. The website (www.conservapedia.com) was started in 2006 to counter left-wing bias and moral relativism present in Wikipedia.
The Conservapedia founder and owner is American homeschool teacher and Catholic attorney Andrew Schlafly, son of renowned Catholic conservative activist Phyllis Schlafly.
Schlafly graduated from Harvard Law School in 1991 with a J.D. in the same class with future U.S. president Barack Obama. He was an editor of the Harvard Law Review from 1989 to 1991.
Conservapedia was founded by him to confront leftist lies, but also to dispel misconceptions on major issues, including the Inquisition. It can be very helpful for conservatives in Brazil, the largest Catholic nation in the world. There is a movement among some Brazilian Catholics who originally actively advocated pro-life issues, but now they are actively advocating the revisionism of the Inquisition, even by downplaying the horror of people being burned at the stake. For example, a Brazilian Catholic, who is an immigrant in the U.S., said, “Even in the popular image of the Inquisition fires, lies are predominant. Everybody believe that condemned individuals ‘died burned,’ amid horrible suffering. The flames were high, more than 16 feet high, to hinder suffering. The condemned individuals (less than ten a year in two dozen nations) died suffocated in a few minutes, before the flames could touch them.”
Conservapedia, whose owner cannot be accused of being “anti-Catholic” or left-wing by radicals, says about the Inquisition:
The term inquisition can refer to either an investigation by the Roman Catholic Church into heresy, or to the department appointed to perform such investigations. This is currently titled the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith since 1965, but was formerly been titled the Supreme Sacred Congregation of the Holy Office, and prior to that the Supreme Sacred Congregation of the Roman and Universal Inquisition. Several major inquisitions took place, under the management of differing departments.
Many of these inquisitions are known to have used brutal torture to extract confessions from accused heretics. While many of these accused heretics would be allowed free after repenting their views and stating their loyalty to the Church, a significant number — consisting almost entirely of those who refused to repent — were executed by a variety of deliberately painful methods including burning at the stake while alive, boiling in oil and the “breaking wheel.”
Execution was never carried out by the church directly for theological reasons, but by secular authorities. This procedure was clarified in the Ad exstirpanda papal bull written by Pope Innocent IV in 1252, which also authorized the use of torture for extracting confessions from the accused and recommended burning at the stake as the appropriate punishment for those found guilty and unrepentant. Ad exstirpanda marked the beginning of one of the most brutal periods of Inquisition.
The best known of the four major inquisitions was the Spanish Inquisition, which ran from 1438 onwards. One of its primary tasks was enforcement of the Alhambra Decree by the monarchs of Spain in 1492, ordering the immediate expulsion of all Jews from the country and its territories.
The Office of the Inquisition would not be established until 1542 by Pope Paul III, with its stated objective “to maintain and defend the integrity of the faith and to examine and proscribe errors and false doctrines.”
Portuguese version of this article: Conservapedia e a Inquisição
Recommended Reading on the Inquisition:

Monday, August 11, 2014

People for the American Way’s Leftist Diatribe Against a Brazilian Conservative


People for the American Way’s Leftist Diatribe Against a Brazilian Conservative

By Julio Severo
The American Way should be to expose and destroy tyrannies, especially socialism. But do not tell that to the People for the American Way (PFAW), which, according to WorldNetDaily, is “an atheist socialist organization which, through publications like its ‘Right Wing Watch,’ dedicates itself to the destruction of conservatives in general.”
Former leftist U.S. President Bill Clinton in People for the American Way
The latest attack from “Right Wing Watch” was against me, Julio Severo, in a piece entitled “BarbWire Pundit Defends Brazil’s Past Violent Dictatorship, Fears Looming ‘Gay Agenda.’” My BarbWire article, “U.S. Betrays Military Men Who Protected Brazil from Communist Threat,” just exposes that the Obama administration is betraying military men who protected Brazil from violent and bloody communist revolutions and rules. It also stresses that in this time in Brazil there was freedom to proclaim the Gospel, and that Billy Graham, Rex Humbard and Pat Robertson reached millions with their Christian message.
According to its website, “Right Wing Watch” has a special mission to attack conservatives opposed to the gay agenda, abortion and Muslim ideology.
“Right Wing Watch” has denounced C. Peter Wagner, founder of the New Apostolic Reformation, for his influence on the conservative candidacy of Rick Perry for the U.S. presidency in 2010. Wagner is best known for leading the conservative resistance to the efforts by Liberation Theology adherents to hijack the Lausanne Congress on World Evangelization in 1974. The hijack was successful only years later through the Theology of Integral Mission, which is the Protestant version of the Liberation Theology.
“Right Wing Watch” has also denounced WorldNetDaily for its exposé of John Brennan, the director of CIA who converted to Islam and allegedly was recruited in Saudi Arabia. Islam is undeniably violent. Saudi Arabia is one of the most violent tyrannies in the world. But the real enemy, for PFAW, is WorldNetDaily.
PFAW has also attacked Joseph Farah, the owner of WorldNetDaily, for saying that “Obama Is ‘At War With God.’”
In another piece, “Right Wing Watch” says: “Franklin Graham Blasts ‘Anti-Christ’ Obama Administration, ‘Ungodly’ World Vision For Accepting Gays.” Graham is the son of the most famous American evangelist, Billy Graham. He is also the president of the Billy Graham Evangelistic Association.
There are many other PFAW attacks on Graham, including: “Franklin Graham Endorses Vladimir Putin’s Anti-Gay Crackdown.”
Of course, Graham did not endorse any crackdown. He just supported the Russian law that protects children from homosexual propaganda. Does PFAW endorse forcing Russian children to be exposed to the immoral and nasty gay propaganda? Does PFAW endorse pedophilia?
The excellent stance of Graham was the cover story in Decision magazine, a famous evangelical publication of BGEA, entitled: “Putin’s Olympic Controversy.”
The Russian law protecting children was not praised only by Graham. The World Congress of Families, which is the largest pro-family and pro-life organization in the world, praised it too. Its spokesman, Don Feder, defended it in his article: “Sochi and The Left’s Human Rights Hypocrisy.” But again, “Right Wing Watch” attacked Feder in its malevolent article “World Congress Of Families Spokesman: Putin Will Save America From ‘Heady Elixir Of Sexual Rights.’”
So, according to PFAW, homosexual activists need unrestricted access to children. And if you try to protect them, you are the problem. You are violent.
According to PFAW, children should be exposed to messages about Islam as a “religion of peace.” And if you try to protect them, you are the problem. You are violent.
Norman Lear, founder of PFAW
People for the American Way (PFAW), founded by Norman Lear, has partnered with leftist and pro-abortion organizations and receives grants from many groups, including the Ford Foundation. In 2013, the Ford Foundation, which has been a population control investor for many years in Brazil, gave $300,000 to PFAW.
According to Conservapedia, “98 percent of the PFAW’s political contributions went to Democratic Party candidates.” This is, PFAW is solidly committed to Obama’s pro-abortion and pro-homosexuality party.
This definitely is not the American way. Population control; advocacy of abortion, Islam and homosexuality; efforts to withdraw protection of children from the homosexual propaganda: this is not the American way.
The American way, as lived by George Washington and other real Americans, was virtue and respect to God. But PFAW wants to pervert it into depravity and disrespect to God. By the way, Washington did not accept homosexuality and he would never have accepted the Islamic ideology. And absolutely he would have supported every effort to protect children from homosexual propaganda and to chastise homosexual propagandists.
If PFAW dislikes conservative Christians, it should not spare George Washington and his original American way.
The PFAW’s leftist diatribes against Franklin Graham, C. Peter Wagner, Don Feder, the World Congress of Families and me just put me in a worthy company. I am sure that Washington would have been pleased to join us.
I am also sure that Josef Stalin and the tyrannical Saudi kings (who have no tolerance for Christians and free speech) would have been pleased to join the so-called “People for the American Way” — better labeled “People for the Anti-Christian Way.”
Recommended Reading: