Tuesday, February 20, 2018

Proved: Russian Trolls Did in the U.S. Presidential Election… What the U.S. Does in the Elections of Other Nations


Proved: Russian Trolls Did in the U.S. Presidential Election… What the U.S. Does in the Elections of Other Nations

By Julio Severo
According to the indictment by Special Counsel Robert Mueller, Russia meddled in the 2016 U.S. presidential election: through internet trolls!
There is much deliberate confusion regarding this meddling. But one thing is definitely clear: The American and global Left was solidly behind their candidate Hillary Clinton. For them, anyone or any nation hindering Clinton’s victory committed an “unpardonable” sin. And what did American investigation show? That Russian trolls acted definitely against Clinton, who lost the election.
Patrick J. Buchanan, a former adviser to President Ronald Reagan and former Republican presidential candidate, said, “One imaginative Russian troll urged Trumpsters to dress up a female volunteer in an orange prison jump suit, put her in a cage on a flatbed truck, then append the slogan, ‘Lock Her Up!’”
Russians committed the “unpardonable” sin, and now Democrats and Republicans, U.S. left-wingers and right-wingers want make Russia pay for allegedly helping Donald Trump win, as if the heavy sanctions Obama imposed — and not discontinued by Trump — on Russia were not enough.
Often, I think that U.S. left-wingers and right-wingers use to attack Russia as a scarecrow to distract the American public and the world. While both sides keep us distracted, they can advance any agenda they share. And there is a shared agenda: the neocon ideology.
While Mueller’s indictments confirm that Russian trolls meddled in the U.S. election, what explains the left-wing and right-wing hysteria against Russia?
In this point, I agree with Rev. Chuck Baldwin, who said “The War Party Marches On.” This party is comprised by both the Democratic Party and the Republican Party. The Neocon Party, which is above all parties in the U.S., needs a scarecrow.
Socialists accuse Russia, because their candidate lost. But conservatives, especially neoconservatives (neocons), are also accusing Russia.
If the alleged Russian meddling through trolls is an act supreme hostility, why during his 2016 campaign, did candidate Trump say, “Russia, if you’re listening, I hope you’re able to find the 30,000 emails that are missing”? He was referring to emails on Clinton’s private server that she said she deleted, according to an Associated Pres report.
Trump made such daring public request because it was clear, for him, that Russia was against Clinton.
Now he is showing dissatisfaction with the alleged Russian meddling in the U.S. elections, but he seems to ignore the U.S. meddling in the elections of other nations. John Perkins, in his book “Confessions of an Economic Hit Man,” has said that U.S. intelligence agencies have rigged elections in other nations for decades.
According to Joseph Farah, WND (WorldNetDaily) chief, even Israel did not escape from U.S. meddling in Israeli elections. Farah said, “Barack Obama used U.S. taxpayer money openly to influence the election of its best ally in the Middle East, Israel.” He added, “The late Sen. Ted Kennedy actually asked for the Soviet Union’s help in defeating Ronald Reagan’s re-election effort in 1988. Where were the scowls of outrage back then?”
If Democrats could ask Soviet Union to help defeat a Republican candidate, why cannot a Republican candidate ask a conservative Russia to help defeat a Democrat candidate? It was what Trump did in 2016.
In his WND article titled “Is that Russia troll farm an act of war?” Patrick J. Buchanan said:
As for Russian trolling in our election, do we really have clean hands when it comes to meddling in elections and the internal politics of regimes we dislike?
Sen. John McCain and Victoria Nuland of State egged on the Maidan Square crowds in Kiev that overthrew the elected government of Ukraine. When the democratically elected regime of Mohamed Morsi was overthrown, the U.S. readily accepted the coup as a victory for our side and continued aid to Egypt as tens of thousands of Muslim Brotherhood members were imprisoned.
Are the CIA and National Endowment for Democracy under orders not to try to influence the outcome of elections in nations in whose ruling regimes we believe we have a stake?
“Have we ever tried to meddle in other countries’ elections?” Laura Ingraham asked former CIA Director James Woolsey this weekend.
With a grin, Woolsey replied, “Oh, probably.”
“We don’t do that anymore, though?” Ingraham interrupted. “We don’t mess around in other people’s elections, Jim?”
“Well,” Woolsey said with a smile. “Only for a very good cause.”
Indeed, what is the National Endowment for Democracy all about, if not aiding the pro-American side in foreign nations and their elections?
Did America have no active role in the “color-coded revolutions” that have changed regimes from Serbia to Ukraine to Georgia?
When Republicans discuss Iran on Capitol Hill, the phrase “regime change” is frequently heard… in 2009, Republicans denounced President Obama for not intervening more energetically to alter the outcome [in Iran].
When China, Russia and Egypt expel NGOs, are their suspicions that some have been seeded with U.S. agents merely marks of paranoia?
The U.S. role in the overthrow of Premier Mossadegh in Iran in 1953, and of Jacobo Arbenz in Guatemala in 1954, and of President Ngo Dinh Diem in Saigon in 1963 are established facts.
So when the U.S. does exactly what it condemns in other nations, it is correct and democratic. But no nation is entitled to copy U.S. actions. Journalist Glenn Greenwald said about “the most vivid distillations of American Exceptionalism” in his Twitter account: “the US has the full, unfettered right to do exactly what we demand other nations don’t do because — unlike them — we’re Good, so it’s done for Good ends, not Bad ones.”
In my Twitter account, I answered him: “Sad, but true. Only evangelical Christians, who made a difference in the birth of America, can also make a difference today against neocons’ interference and discrepancy in the US foreign policy.”
The U.S. government, under left-wing and right-wing presidents, makes a big fuss over minimal meddling in the U.S. election (even internet trolls are a supreme crime against the U.S., according to neocons), but both sides heavily meddle, with covert CIA operations through NGOs and other ways, in the elections of other nations.
As Jesus said,
“And as you wish that others would do to you, do so to them.” (Luke 6:31 ESV)
Instead making fuss over Russian trolls and using Russia as a scarecrow for the sake of neocon policies, America under Trump should prosecute Obama for creating ISIS, which committed genocide of Christians in Syria and Iraq. Trump himself said in 2016 that Obama created ISIS. So Obama and Hillary Clinton were accomplices of genocide of Christians. By the U.S. law, which condemns accomplices of mass murders, would not both deserve capital punishment for aiding and abetting the genocide of Christian through ISIS?
America under Trump should prosecute Obama and Clinton for provoking Russia since Putin passed in 2013 a law banning homosexual propaganda to children and teens.
America under Trump should prosecute Obama and Clinton for overthrowing the Ukrainian government in 2014 and imposing sanctions on Russia in the aftermath of U.S. interference in Ukraine.
America under Trump should prosecute Obama and Clinton for using the U.S. government to promote Islam, abortion and the homosexual agenda around the world.
The U.S. should stop using Russia as a scarecrow and deal with Obama’s and Clinton’s crimes.
Trump should discontinue Obama’s left-wing legacy of sanctions and other unconservative actions against a more conservative Russia.
Russia could retaliate Obama’s and Hillary Clinton’s mischiefs through nuclear attack. Who can blame them for using internet trolls to vent their complaints against Clinton?
Recommended Reading:

Sunday, February 18, 2018

Top U.S. conservative conference bans pro-family Christian group and approves homosexualist group


Top U.S. conservative conference bans pro-family Christian group and approves homosexualist group

By Julio Severo
The Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC), the oldest and largest annual “conservative” conference in America, has abruptly banned pro-family group MassResistance as an exhibitor at its national meeting for Feb. 21-24 while permitting the homosexualist group Log Cabin Republicans to remain. Log Cabin Republicans is a wing of homosexual militants in the Republican Party. See Log Cabin Republicans in homosexual actions here: https://youtu.be/saztH0Xl9zc
Pro-sodomy “conservative” Jeb Bush speaking at CPAC
CPAC had officially approved MassResistance in January, but days ago CPAC Executive Director Dan Schneider disinvited the organization. CPAC justified its decision citing the group’s Biblical approach to fighting the culture war — particularly the transgender agenda in public schools.
With MassResistance banned from the exhibitor’s hall roster, no exclusively pro-family, pro-marriage groups will be present at CPAC.
“For the past three years — including this year — the radical homosexual group Log Cabin Republicans (LCR) has been a sponsor and exhibitor at CPAC,” explained Brian Camenker, founder and president of MassResistance. “Prior to that, another homosexual group called GOProud was an official exhibitor in 2009 and 2010.”
“LCR pushes hard to homosexualize the Republican Party and have LGBT officials and judges appointed,” continued Camenker. “They fight for LGBT ‘anti-discrimination’ laws that are used to punish Christian businesses. They’ve pushed hard to force open homosexuality — and recently transgenders — into the U.S. military. They placed an ad in USA Today to strongly denounce the 2016 GOP platform committee for supporting traditional marriage. They brag that they are ‘creating change.’”
It’s not only the presence of pro-homosexuality and transgender groups at CPAC that worries the MassResistance founder.
“In 2016 and 2017 the group Atheist Voter had a table at CPAC,” said Camenker. “In 2015, its parent organization, American Atheists, was granted a main stage speech. The group pushes for God-less government policies, removal of ‘Christian ideology’ from all government, repeal of religious exemptions from onerous LGBT laws, and more reporting requirements on churches. They also support the LGBT agenda, abortion ‘rights,’ and are ‘fighting abstinence-only until marriage sex education.’”
“It is unconscionable that a self-styled conservative organization like CPAC would ban a sponsorship table for a leading pro-family group like MassResistance — while allowing the homosexual activist Log Cabin Republicans to sponsor a table at the same conference,” said Peter LaBarbera, founder and president of Americans For Truth About Homosexuality (AFTAH). Interestingly, the precursor of AFTAH was launched at a CPAC gathering 25 years ago.
“This is upside-down,” continued LaBarbera. “It is Log Cabin Republicans, which crusades for homosexual ‘marriage,’ that is undermining conservatism. I call on CPAC and its CEO Matt Schlapp to reverse this awful decision.”
LaBarbera said veteran social conservative Camenker is a “brave, pro-family hero.”
“Brian has been fighting the radical gay and transgender agenda for decades, and has never wavered. He certainly deserves better than to have his good name sullied and his group expelled by CPAC.”
“CPAC needs to stop pandering to LGBTQ advocates and make this right. Banning pro-moral voices is a tactic of the Left, not the Right,” he added.
“It is simply unconscionable for a ‘conservative’ organization to welcome in homosexual activists while banishing the leading national grassroots organization fighting the LGBTQ (Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Queer) lobby. That is why I have called on the American Conservative Union, which runs CPAC, to reverse its decision and allow MassResistance to have a booth. AFTAH’s predecessor, the newsletter Lambda Report, was launched at CPAC 25 years ago, so this latest politically correct absurdity really hurts personally. As we predicted, out-and-proud homosexuality is now corrupting conservatism and Christianity; it is incompatible with both.”
When the ban of MassResistance became a scandal after it was denounced by LaBarbera, LifeSiteNews and other pro-life websites, CPAC invited the Family Research Council (FRC) to have a booth, as a last-minute strategy to cover up its scandalous ban against MassResistance. This strategy hardly helps CPAC, because if FRC will be present as a conservative group against the homosexual agenda, why is there no room for many other excellent conservative groups fighting the homosexual agenda? This is a bigger scandal, because it is inconceivable that the “biggest conservative conference” in America has not invited all the major conservative groups in America. In fact, after hearing of the action against MassResistance, Peter LaBarbera applied and paid for an Exhibitors Booth at CPAC. He had to pay 2,000 dollars. If there is a Christian conservative leader who deserves to be a speaker and much more in CPAC is LaBarbera. Yet, he has received no answer from CPAC after several days.
The annual CPAC event in Washington, DC has been a very big deal for conservatives since its inception, attracting thousands of conservative-minded people from across the country each year. It’s where Republican candidates and other major conservative political figures come to speak and be seen – everyone, from Presidents Ronald Reagan to Donald Trump; Conservative Senators like Ted Cruz and Marco Rubio; and media icons such as Sean Hannity and Mark Levin.
Many of the conference speakers, such as former New Mexico Governor Gary Johnson (speaking this year), are pro-LGBT Libertarians. Marijuana legalization groups were CPAC exhibitors in 2015.
Sponsored by the American Conservative Union (ACU), the annual conference has been an important presence in Washington since 1973. According to its website, ACU has served for more than fifty years “as an umbrella organization harnessing the collective strength of conservative organizations fighting for Americans who are concerned with liberty, personal responsibility, traditional values, and strong national defense.”
CPAC and its parent group ACU state that they are “America’s premier conservative voice” and that “ACU defines conservatism.”
Yet, focusing on traditional marriage — the bedrock of social conservative values — seems to have less of a presence in the CPAC agenda, while LGBT ideology is finding a foothold among its “conservatives.”
Missing also is the presence of notable pro-family leaders as Franklin Graham, James Dobson, Scott Lively, Joseph Farah, William J. Murray and many others.
“Similar to the direction of the GOP establishment, in recent years CPAC has become more libertarian-oriented and pro-LGBT — and hardly any pro-family groups have had exhibits or been sponsors,” said MassResistance’s Camenker.
“Is this really what conservatism in America has become?” wonders Camenker. “What group gets to claim it defines conservatism? Is MassResistance the only pro-family group that’s publicly standing up to the powerful sexual-radical movement?”
Many conservatives had criticized CPAC for choosing Yiannopoulos as its keynote speaker because they did not see him as a traditional conservative. Instead, Yiannopoulos was seen as the figurehead of the alt-Right movement, a movement that prides itself in nationalism, which many accuse of racism and anti-Semitism.
Yet, the pro-pedophilia videos abruptly destroyed his keynote opportunity.
“Due to the revelation of an offensive video in the past 24 hours condoning pedophilia, the American Conservative Union has decided to rescind the invitation of Milo Yiannopoulos to speak at the Conservative Political Action Conference,” ACU Chairman Matt Schlapp said in a statement.
Nevertheless, CPAC has invited the homosexualist group Log Cabin Republicans. This signals a dangerous trend among U.S. conservatives. Even U.S. President Donald Trump, who is praised among conservatives for his pro-life policies, has praised Log Cabin Republicans. In fact, he chose to maintain in his administration LGBTQ activist Chai Feldblum in a major federal post. Trump’s decision was blasted by American rabbis. Feldblum had been originally appointed by Obama for her homosexual activism.
Trump has also maintained in his administration the most powerful symbol of the former Obama administration’s homosexual imperialism: the post of the Special Envoy for the Human Rights of LGBTI Persons. Many American conservatives have complained of Trump’s bad decision. LaBarbera said, “The reinstatement of Randy Berry as Special Envoy for the Human Rights of LGBTI Persons is another defeat for pro-family advocates who were counting on Trump to remove homosexual activists from the foreign affairs bureaucracy.”
Will this dangerous trend spread among conservatives?
The attempt to associate homosexuality with conservatism will produce an automatic divorce from the most important ally of conservatism: Christian values.
Conservatism can survive without homosexuality, but it cannot survive without Christian values.
The new union of nationalism and homosexuality will not destroy the homosexualist movement. It will bring the homosexualist movement into the conservative movement, giving gay militants the supreme privilege to advance their ideology through the Left and the Right at the same time. It will destroy the traditional union between the conservative movement and Bible-believing Christians in the United States.
MassResistance, which opposes homosexual indoctrination on schoolchildren, was banned from CPAC, while Log Cabin Republicans, which attacks the GOP’s stand for traditional marriage, was allowed.
What does CPAC want? To learn more lessons? More “conservative” homosexuals being exposed as Milo Yiannopoulos was?
Major conservative political figures in CPAC, including Marco Rubio, are neocons — whose ambition is to push for the U.S. military hegemony around the world, often at the expense of the very Christians values advocated by America’s Founders. Neoconservatism is corrupting CPAC.
In 2017 Trevor Loudon, an esoteric neocon, was a CPAC speaker.
Real Christian conservatives should take a stand regarding CPAC’s “conservatism.”
In solidarity to MassResistance, the Family Research Council should excuse itself from the CPAC meeting and demand a full explanation of why MassResistance and many other similar pro-family groups in America have not been officially invited for leading participation and why Log Cabin Republicans has not been banned and expelled. FRC should protest Log Cabin Republicans’s presence at CPAC.
Worse than a corrupt Left is a corrupt conservatism. From Left, you expect corruption as normal. But from conservatism, you do not expect corruption and acceptance of ideologies, including the homosexual agenda, that clash directly with the Bible values that founded America.
With information from Americans for Truth and LifeSiteNews.
Recommended Reading:

Wednesday, February 14, 2018

Why the American Left Hates Russia


Why the American Left Hates Russia

Russia’s conservatism stirs hysteria and fear

By Julio Severo
China, the largest communist nation in the world, has stolen entire computer banks of information from the U.S.  government. Their new weapons systems look suspiciously like the U.S. weapon systems. China has manipulated trade markets and its currency to steal from America its wealth, and its trade secrets.
Yet, there is no U.S. hysteria against China. No U.S. sanctions or boycotts on China, which is officially atheist and communist. On the contrary, in spite of the Chinese attacks, left-wing president Barack Obama and right-wing president Donald Trump officially visited China and showed respect for its communist rulers.
In contrast, Russia, which is not atheist and communist, has been consistently accused, by the mainstream left-wing media in the U.S., of cyber intrusions during the 2016 presidential election. Obama imposed sanctions on Russia and Trump has continued the sanctions.
So if communist China’s actions are worse than Russia’s actions, why is Russia the favorite victim of attacks from the U.S. corrupt media, the Democrats, and the Left in general?
The media’s anti-Russian propaganda has been so pervasive and successful that even Trump succumbed to the pressure to change. The 2016 Trump who preached partnership with Russia against Islamic terror was replaced by a Trump, now president, who makes no compromises to Russia and has fully succumbed to the neocon swamp and its ambitions.
The United States tolerates kindly even Saudi Arabia, which has fomented Islamic terror around the world. 9/11 was committed by Saudi terrorists.
But America does not tolerate Russia.
What accounts for such extreme intolerance? The answer is very simple: Russia today embodies everything the U.S. Left hates.
Russia is Christian. In fact, Russia is the largest Christian Orthodox nation in the world. Russian Christianity is not similar to the U.S. evangelicalism. The United States is the largest Protestant nation in the world. Russian Christianity is more similar, in some traditionalistic respects, including in the worship of saints, to Catholicism.
There is a symbiotic relationship between the Russian government and the Russian Christian Orthodox Church. They help each other maintain money and power.
Writing in the Washington Times, L. Todd Wood said, “Visiting Moscow reminds me in some ways of the American South. There is a new church going up on every corner in the Russian capital. You can’t help hear the bells ringing somewhere during the day from some church or monastery nearby. The golden domes dot the landscape.”
We all know how the Left despises Christianity and enables Islam, the homosexual agenda, etc.
Russia is mostly white. Although 30 percent of Russia is Muslim, Russia tries to protect its culture by brutally repressing Islamic extremism. Russia treats its Muslim citizens and mosques just as Israel treats its Muslim citizens and mosques.
Left-wing Obama used to make derogatory comments on Russia and Putin he never did regarding communist China, such as “Russia is a regional power that doesn’t make anything” and “Putin’s school boy slouch.”
Russia is conservative in many ways. For the most part, Russian women hate feminism. They had the opportunity to experience real “equality” during Soviet times — and they didn’t like it. “Why should I want to act like a man and have to do everything?” Russian women ask. Sex roles are very defined in Russia to the horror of the cultural Marxists in the West.
You can understand the Russian conservatism by reading an exclusive interview by William J. Murray to me in 2015. Murray, who is the son of a prominent American Marxist and atheist, converted to Christ and offers today a Christian view on the current Russia.
Russia has a law banning homosexual propaganda. The law simply makes it a crime to expose homosexual propaganda to children and teens. While in Russia parents who do not want their children being indoctrinated in the homosexual lifestyle are respected, in the West generally and in America particularly, homosexuality is being crammed down children’s throats in school, over the objections of most parents.
Left-wing Obama and all the mainstream U.S. media mocked Russia and Putin because of this law. The Advocate, the most prominent homosexual magazine in the U.S. and in the world, sarcastically announced that its 2014 Person of the Year was Vladimir Putin, saying “The Russian president became the single greatest threat to LGBTs in the world in 2014.”
Russia is plagued by corruption, not much different from Brazil, the largest Catholic nation in the world. Traditionalistic Christianity seems to be prone to corruption.
However, Russia is not the Soviet Union. Russia is not looking to conquer the world — differently from U.S. neocons, who do want total global hegemony. As the largest country on the planet, Russia is just attempting to defend its geopolitical presence.
The Russia hysteria in the West is today largely driven by the American Left and can be explained in a very simple way: Russia is Christian, white and conservative… everything the Left loves to hate. This truth needs to be understood and explained to people.
American evangelicals who elected Trump and have been consistently bombarded by an anti-Russian propaganda from the left-wing media should find ways, just as Trump proposed in his 2016 campaign, to work together with Christian Russia to deal with the greatest threat to the security of America, Europe and Russia: Islamic terrorism.
With information from the Washington Times.
Portuguese version of this article: Por que a esquerda americana odeia a Rússia
Recommended Reading: