Tuesday, August 22, 2017

Google’s Racial War Against Whites?


Google’s Racial War Against Whites?

By Julio Severo
If the skin color is not important, why is Google giving preeminence to Afrocentrism and black supremacism, which value its own “cultural” color as superior to all other “cultural” colors?
Bishop James E. Dukes of Chicago’s Liberation Christian Center wants the removal of George Washington’s statue from the Washington Park in Chicago because he considers the first U.S. president “racist”
If you defend “Europeancentrism,” it is branded automatically “racist.” But if you defend Afrocentrism (which is synonymous with “blackcentrism,” meaning everything that has the Afro or black “cultural” color is to be in the center of everything) it just fine for the Left and for Google. For them, European in the center is “racism,” just because European is synonymous with white. But Afro in the center is not racism, just because African is synonymous with black.
According to Merriam-Webster Dictionary, racism is “a belief that some races are by nature superior to others; also: discrimination based on such belief.”
Google has been doing it. Not against blacks. Against whites.
Google puts Afrocentrism as superior to others.
Google does discrimination based on such belief.
Google just is not severely chastised, condemned, ostracized and morally and legally lynched by the powerful mainstream media because in the prevalent left-wing media mindset anything done against blacks is a crime and anything done against whites is “long overdue.” The Left believes that whites deserve persecution.
Google and the Left despise America’s spiritual essence.
America has produced so many inventions that America and inventions are almost synonymous.
Since America is mostly white due to her European roots, most American inventors are white.
A study reported by DailyMail gave the reason for the abundant inventiveness in America: Protestantism. DailyMail said that American white Protestants are incredibly creative. More creative than Catholics and Jews.
Is it just incidental that the largest Protestant nation in the world — the United States — is also the most creative nation in the world?
The abundant historical creativeness and inventiveness in the United States is a direct result of its overwhelmingly Protestant white culture.
But Google wants you to see it differently. When you google “white inventors,” many hits in the first page are negatively exotic. Many in the hits are not whites, and many reports on whites in the hits are not positive. (See Google’s results recorded here: http://archive.is/guslk)
The pictures, which should show only white people, mostly depict black people. The most prominent articles portray whites in an inferior and demeaning light.
It seems that whites, in the Google universe, should be taken out of sight. Perhaps they should not exist. Racism is rampant at Google — against whites.
In contrast, when you google “black inventors,” hits are outstandingly positive. Hits, in the first page, show fine reports on blacks. (See Google’s results recorded here: http://archive.is/wq6z5)
The pictures, which should show only black people, actually depict only black people!
Even when you use Google in Portuguese in Brazil, hits for black inventors (see: http://archive.is/WOmVM) are vastly better than hits for white inventors (see: http://archive.is/xa2wq).
Google’s behavior is perfectly consistent with AFROCENTRISM. “Afro,” relating to Africa or blacks. “Centrism,” relating to center. According to the Oxford Dictionary of English, the adjective “Afrocentric” means “regarding African or black culture as pre-eminent.”
To portray European or white culture as pre-eminent, even when it is historically pre-eminent in America and in Europe, is “racism.” But to portray African or black culture as pre-eminent, even when it is historically not pre-eminent in an overwhelmingly European or white culture, is not racism. Protected racism? Protected dishonesty?
Why is Google imposing the Afrocentric trend, which has a destructive trail?
Last week, the Washington Times reported that Bishop James E. Dukes of Chicago’s Liberation Christian Center made headlines for calling on the Chicago mayor to rename Washington Park and remove a statue of the first U.S. president over his ties to slavery. Bishop Dukes, who is a Pentecostal black, told his Facebook flock that “it’s time.”
And yesterday the Washington Times reported that “A monument to Christopher Columbus that was over 200 years old [in Baltimore] was smashed with a sledgehammer Monday morning to combat a ‘culture of white supremacy.’”
Columbus was an Italian explorer and navigator (of Jewish extraction) who discovered America in 1492. His “crime” in an America obsessed with Afrocentrism? He was white.
If even a black Pentecostal bishop wants a statue of white George Washington removed, what expect from Google?
So it is no wonder that whites have been morally and culturally blacklisted by Google not only in English but internationally, including in Brazil. A Google search for white inventors presents dishonest results in the U.S. and internationally.
Why is Google giving preference to Afrocentrism?
Why is Google demoting the rich American white Protestant culture?
Why is Google behaving in a discriminatory way?
Whether Google recognizes it or not, America was founded by white people, who were 98 percent Protestant.
American blacks, who are so proud of their accomplishments, were able to flourish only in a white Protestant culture. If they had never been taken to America as slaves and still lived in Africa, could they have flourished in the same way they flourished in America?
In the 13th century, when white Europe had castles and cities with impressive cathedrals and buildings, black Africa had… almost nothing. A vast continent, larger than Europe, without castles and impressive buildings.
Even though Afrocentrists and black supremacists point to ancient Egypt and its massive pyramids as an example that Africa was superior to the old European castles and buildings, modern studies shatter the Afrocentrists’ Egyptian hope. According to a WND report, “In the first full genome sequencing of ancient Egyptians, spanning a 1,300-year-period dating back to 1400 B.C., scientists have concluded the people of the pharaonic period were more closely related to modern Europeans.”
White Protestant Americans have a colossal legacy of constructions and inventions. To exterminate it from history (and Google) is racism leading, obviously, to cultural genocide.
If Afrocentrists and black supremacists (including Google, which has put black inventors in the center of inventions and above white inventors) want to be honest with themselves, they should move to Africa and live only with what Africans created there.
If they want to be honest with reality, they should recognize that the white Protestant culture in America was and is the best environment for them to flourish.
Yes, there are problems in the U.S. white culture, including racism. Every culture is imperfect. But white Protestant churches have recognized, condemned and fought against racism centuries before Google. And racism is not an exclusive American issue. Even in Africa, there is racism of black tribes against black tribes.
Slavery abolition did not come from Africa or blacks or Google or Afrocentrists or black supremacists. It came from Protestant whites. Even today, there is slavery in Africa — blacks enslaving blacks —, while in the white America they are free.
Prominent whites in the anti-slavery movement, which was white, were Protestants William Wilberforce, Charles Finney, Abraham Lincoln, etc.
Wilberforce created the first law, with international impact, banning slavery over 200 years ago.
The worst kind of white racism in the world history was Nazism, which was not defeated by Africa, or blacks, or Google or Afrocentrists or black supremacists. It was defeated by the United States and the Soviet Union, largely white nations, which were in military alliance against the esoteric, white racism of Nazi Germany.
The main world leaders against Nazism — Protestant Franklin Delano Roosevelt and atheist Josef Stalin — were totally white. There was a difference between them — capitalism and Marxism —, and this difference, hated and loved by blacks, was born in Europe. The Democratic and Republican systems were also created in Europe.
Even in South Africa, racism was defeated only after a powerful pressure from the white America, white Europe and white Soviet Union.
So whites are in an excellent position to speak against racism, because they have fought racism among themselves as no other race has ever fought.
White Protestant Americans and English Protestant Europeans banned slavery in their white nations and also in many black nations in Africa — with no Google help and with no Afrocentric help.
White Protestant Americans and English Protestant Europeans freed white and black slaves — with no Google help and with no Afrocentric help.
Whites are preeminent, as no other race, in the fight against racism and slavery. Even when black leaders are involved in the fight against racism, their fight was inspired and helped by whites. Protestant minister Martin Luther King Jr., who was inspired by the American white socialist Baptist theologian Walter Rauschenbusch, would never have had success without white support. Nelson Mandela, who was inspired by white Karl Marx, would never have had success without white support from Europe, America and the Soviet Union.
If, as Afrocentrists accuse, whites have an eternal debt to blacks over black slavery, and Google is demoting white inventors as a reparative measure, why do not they demand reparations from Muslims nations that were chief slavers for centuries, including selling black slaves to Europeans and Americans? Why does not Google also demote Muslims? Muslims also sold untold thousands of white slaves to Africa.
Why do not Afrocentrists demand reparations from African nations that sold black slaves to Europeans and Americans? Why does not Google also demote such nations in its search engine?
Black slavery would have been impossible without conquering black tribes selling blacks from vanquished tribes to Europeans and Americans. Africa has huge reparations to do to black Americans.
And in the past centuries when conquering black tribes had no Americans and Europeans to sell their black slaves from vanquished tribes, they sold them among themselves. Black selling black. Black buying black. Slavery was too normal in Africa.
Considering that slavery is old and traditional in Africa, could blacks have freed themselves alone without Protestant Americans and English Protestant Europeans? If they had such power, Africa would have no slavery even today.
Could blacks have flourished without the predominant white Protestant culture in the U.S.?
Ku Klux Klan (KKK) is repugnant and should be banned and condemned. Most Protestant whites condemn it. But do Google and most blacks condemn Afrocentrism and black supremacism?
So Afrocentrists and Google have no excuse to use KKK to hide, demote and undervalue factual truths about whites and their obvious positive hegemony in the U.S. inventions. Google has no right to use its search engine as a propaganda machine to promote an Afrocentric ideology against whites in the U.S., Brazil and around the world.
Google’s dishonesty against white inventors is as repugnant as KKK’s dishonesty against blacks.
If Google did to black inventors what it is doing to white inventors, it would be considered sheer racist propaganda. It would be criminal behavior.
Google would go bankrupt if it treated black inventors as it has been treating white inventors.
Google’s war is not only against white inventors. It is also against reality and honesty.
Racism is rampant in a Google search for white inventors, privileging an Afrocentric ideology and demeaning a powerful American creative culture formed by white Protestants.
Portuguese version of this article: A guerra racial do Google contra os brancos?
Recommended Reading:

Sunday, August 13, 2017

U.S., European Union, Brazil, Argentina, Chile and Israel Pressure Romania to Embrace Homosexual Activism


U.S., European Union, Brazil, Argentina, Chile and Israel Pressure Romania to Embrace Homosexual Activism

By Julio Severo
Homosexual activists complain that Romania does not want to allow homosexual “marriage.” They whine that while the European Union has been making rapid steps to change the definition of family in its laws, Romania is taking steps to protect the traditional family from predatory homosexuality.
In an intrusive attempt to help predatory homosexuality, several embassies expressed in a joint statement solidarity and support for LGBT (lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and intersex) activists of Romania, in the context of the International Day Against Homophobia in May 17.
The statement is signed by the following embassies: Argentina, Australia, Austria, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, Chile, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, Israel, Mexico, Netherlands New Zealand, Norway, Portugal, Serbia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, United Kingdom, United States and Uruguay.
Homosexual activism has minimal support in Romania. So other nations have decided to give a helping hand to Romanian homosexual groups. For example, last year’s Romanian Gay Pride drew 2,500 people, including foreign diplomats.
Homosexual activism in Romania is essentially an imported product. The main homosexualist group, MozaiQ, was founded in 2012 by a Romanian who, while studying at State University in California, married a homosexual, and later returned to Romania to demand legal homosexual “marriage.”
Romanians have the lowest rate of approval for this kind of “marriage” in the whole of the European Union.
Romania is also among the last countries in the European Union not to accept any form of civil union between people of the same sex.
What accounts for such staunch pro-family stance is Christianity. With a population of almost 20 million, according to the last census, 87% Romanians declare themselves Orthodox Christians.
Considering that Romanians overwhelmingly reject homosexual “marriage” and other items of the predatory homosexual activism, why are the U.S., European Union, Brazil, Argentina, Chile and Israel helping Romanian homosexual groups to pressure the Romanian government to embrace such activism?
Dr. Peter Costea, a U.S. citizen born and raised in Romania, is asking the right questions about pro-homosexuality foreign pressures on Romania.
He knows what he is talking about: He is an attorney who has worked for 27 years representing an increasing number of individuals victimized by abusive policies of foreign states and governments.
Addressing the Argentinian ambassador through official letter, he said,
You signed, along with ambassadors from a host of countries, a Declaration in support of the pride parade which took place in Bucharest on May 20, 2017. In doing so, you and the Republic of Argentina have offended 25 million Romanians worldwide, primarily in Romania, the Republic of Moldova, Western Europe, and North America. I am one of the persons you offended.
He added,
This sort of repugnant international behavior has now become an annual ritual, where clusters of countries from around the world sign declarations accusing, more or less directly, the people of Romania of homophobia and transphobia.
I join Costea in the protest. But it is not only Argentina under Mauricio Macri that is helping homosexual groups in Romania. Brazil, my nation, too. I had hoped that with the defeat of the administration of socialist Dilma Rousseff last year, the new Brazilian administration would stop homosexual activism in its foreign policy. My hope was dashed.
I also hoped that with the new administration under Trump the U.S. government would stop its abusive behavior, under the administration of socialist Obama, of using its embassies to meddle in other nations’ affairs to promote the homosexual activism.
I have always denounced the abusive homosexual activism of my own nation. Even though its pro-sodomy foreign policy is nasty, Brazil’s influence is not so significant, thank God, as the massive influence of the U.S. government is.
In my book “O Movimento Homossexual” (The Homosexual Movement), published originally by the Brazilian branch of Bethany House Publishers in 1998, I denounced the Brazilian homosexual movement, which was dependent on the influence from the U.S. homosexual movement. I exposed the U.S. homosexual reality and I speculated that Brazil would copy the U.S. homosexual trends in laws, schools, media, churches, etc. in a few years. Eventually, Brazil actually copied them.
I denounced especially the Bill Clinton administration and its pro-sodomy policies.
And since 2009 I have worked hard to denounce how the Obama administration was promoting the homosexual activism. I had to denounce, because Obama’s pro-homosexuality policies affected directly Brazil and other nations.
Even though Trump is different from Obama, I am aware that he has no conservative history. But he is a businessman who cares about people utilizing his services. In this case, I hoped that he cared about evangelicals, who were his main voting bloc. Trump needed evangelicals, and they helped him. Now evangelicals need Trump to stop homosexual activism in the U.S. foreign policy.
Trump loves contracts. Because white evangelicals voted massively for him, Trump has a moral “contract” with evangelicals.
And if Trump has a moral “contract” with evangelicals, the U.S. Embassy in Romania should never meddle in Romania’s affairs against the moral and Christian values of its people in support of the homosexual sin or any other sin.
Even though some conservatives could think that the American ambassador in Romania had been appointed by Obama, this is not so. Previous ambassadors, under Obama, were not allowed to continue in their jobs after Trump’s inauguration. Trump fired all of them and chose to fulfill each seat with his own appointments to avoid the continuation of Obama’s policies.
It is not only the U.S. Embassy in Romania that is promoting homosexuality. Several U.S. embassies around the world are promoting it. In fact, even the Trump’s State Department recognized June as LGBTI Pride Month.
The U.S. foreign policy is meddling in other nations’ affairs in support of sodomy (sex between men) and Trump is silent about these nasty actions of his own administration, in spite of the fact that he has been informed about these actions and in spite of the fact that he has all the authority to halt them.
The Bible shows that sodomy destroys societies. Trump has not initiated the sodomization of the U.S. society. But he can work to stop it. He has not initiated the sodomization of other nations through the U.S. foreign policy. But he can stop it.
After all, can a nation with a contract with God since its birth keep a contract with sodomy? Conservative evangelicals, who elected Trump, can help him save America from the ravages of sodomy.
Continuing, Peter Costea said to the Argentinian ambassador (a reprimand which I apply to the Brazilian and American ambassadors too):
First, it is not your role as Ambassador to pass judgment on the feelings citizens of other countries have with respect to various issues… By officially throwing your weight and the weight of your country behind the Declaration, you implicitly condemned those who dare express a different view on a highly moral and controversial issue. Just like you, I have also been trained in diplomacy, and one of the fundamental principles we learned in diplomacy school was to respect the feelings of the citizens of the countries in which diplomats are posted and not to offend them.
The role of an Ambassador is to connect states qua states, and communicate matters of mutual concern between them. It is not to lecture the people of a foreign nation in matters of morality and on which rational people differ. It is not to arrogantly convey a position of superiority, by implying that, in this case, you or Argentina stand on higher moral ground, possess such a stellar record on human rights and have never fallen short of your own commitments to human rights, that you have attained the moral position to lecture the people of Romania. Mr. Ambassador, this is highly inappropriate and offensive.
Second, I doubt that in signing the Declaration you expressed the true feelings of your nation on the matter. I doubt you had their approval or consent to sign the Declaration…
Third, I strongly suspect that you signed the Declaration to curry favor with the European Union on behalf of your Government. If so, your action was insincere and motivated by political expediency not conviction. In which case it was hypocritical. It may be that in signing the Declaration you scored points with the European Union, but you scored no points or good will with the people of Romania. Please understand that they, too, have dignity, constitute a sovereign state, a sovereign nation, and the rules of diplomacy do not allow you to subvert their dignity or sovereignty.
Fourth, Argentina is not in a position to lecture Romania or the rest of the world in matters of human rights and tolerance. Please look into your own country’s past and present and spot your own human rights deficiencies. Argentina nearly exterminated all of its native population toward the end of the XIX Century, and today your country discriminates against Evangelicals.
Borrowing from Costea’s language, I say: I strongly suspect that Brazil, Argentina, Chile and Israel signed the Declaration in support of homosexual activism in Romania to curry favor with the European Union and the United States on behalf of their governments.
Their signature was motivated by political expediency and by the politically-correct conviction that the homosexual behavior is above the well-being of families and their children.
The U.S., European Union, Brazil, Argentina, Chile and Israel should be ashamed to help homosexual groups impose predatory homosexual activism in Romania. This is not democracy.
This is international diplomacy at the service of homosexual tyranny.
With information from Agerpres, BalkanInsight, Raluca Ciocian Ardeleanu and Peter Costea’s letter to the Argentinian Ambassador.
Recommended Reading:

Sunday, August 06, 2017

Constituent Sues GOP, Accusing the Party of Fraud


Constituent Sues GOP, Accusing the Party of Fraud

By Julio Severo
A retired attorney in Virginia Beach is so incensed that Republicans couldn’t repeal the Obama’s Affordable Care Act that he’s suing to get political donations back, accusing the GOP of fraud and racketeering.
Bob Heghmann, 70, filed a lawsuit Thursday in U.S. District Court, saying the national and Virginia Republican parties and some GOP leaders raised millions of dollars in campaign funds while knowing they weren’t going to be able to overturn Obama’s socialist law also known as Obamacare.
The GOP “has been engaged in a pattern of Racketeering which involves massive fraud perpetrated on Republican voters and contributors as well as some Independents and Democrats,” the suit said. Racketeering, perhaps better known for use in prosecuting organized crime, involves a pattern of illegal behavior by a specific group.
National GOP committee member Morton Blackwell said the suit is a “sign of conservative anger that the Republican-controlled Congress has not yet repealed and replaced Obamacare.”
He argued that “progressives” had taken over the Democratic Party and seemed to lament that “conservatives” had not yet taken over the Republican Party.
At last, a Republican leader recognizes that the Republican Party is not controlled by conservatives and it is not behaving as a conservative party.
“Too few conservatives are willing to invest their time, talent, and money and personally participate inside the Republican Party,” Blackwell said. “A Republican majority will mean a conservative majority if and when a sufficient number of conservatives figure out why the success of their principles depends on their personal involvement in local, state and national Republican Party committees and in party nomination contests.”
Heghmann’s suit argues that the national GOP raised more than $735 million and Virginia’s party more than $20 million from 2009 to 2016 in large part by promising to repeal the Affordable Care Act.
Heghmann said he has standing to sue the GOP because has been a contributor.
Heghmann’s suit states: “Now that the Republican Party has won the House, the Senate and the Presidency the effort it is making to Repeal and Replace Obamacare is itself a Fraud upon Republican Voters and Donors.”
The “pattern of racketeering” extended to the party’s response to Trump’s candidacy, his suit states. The GOP units raised money to push Obamacare repeal or Trump’s promises but “never intended to implement the Trump Agenda or fulfill the promises of the Republican Platform.”
Heghmann has given an excellent example, especially by clarifying that the GOP should be sued for not fulfilling the Trump Agenda or the promises of the Republican Platform.
The Trump Agenda was clearly anti-neocon, but the same GOP unwilling to defeat the socialist Obamacare is unwilling to implement anti-neocon measures.
Patrick J. Buchanan, a former adviser to Ronald Reagan, said, “The GOP Platform committee rejected a plank to pull the U.S. deeper into Ukraine, by successfully opposing new U.S. arms transfers to Kiev. Improved relations with Russia were what candidate Trump had promised, and what Americans would vote for in November.”
Under neocon pressure, the Trump administration has appointed Kurt Volker, a neocon who was the director of the McCain Institute, to head the Trump policy on Ukraine, guaranteeing the fulfillment of the neocon ambitions against Russia. Volker wants U.S. arms transfers to Kiev.
All of this is a clear sign the Republican Party is not behaving as a conservative party and that conservatives do not control the GOP.
Neocons did not help elect Trump. On the contrary, they opposed him. John McCain was the main neocon opposition to Trump.
So evangelicals should sue the GOP for capitulating to McCain and his neocons. They should sue the GOP for forcing Trump to follow the neocon agenda.
Neocons are engaged in blood-shedding of Christians in other nations. They should be stopped. Trump wanted to do it, but the pressure was too strong. Where are evangelicals and their holy voice and pressure?
Pressure works. When vice president Mike Pence was the Indiana governor, he approved the Religious Freedom Restoration Act to protect religious people from persecution by homosexual activists. But after widespread pressure and boycotts, including from big businesses such as Apple and Wal-Mart, Pence rolled back his religious freedom law. His cowardly changes marked the largest step toward special homosexual rights there in history, according to pro-family activists who studied the language of the changed law.
Today, according to Buchanan, Pence is a neocon who fully approves U.S. military meddling in Ukraine. But by doing it he is violating the original Trump agenda and GOP Platform.
Evangelical leaders, churches and organizations should sue Pence, or the GOP.
Volker, McCain and other neocons should be butted out from the Trump administration.
Recently, socialist Democrats and “conservative” Republicans, spurred by McCain, joined forces to impose more sanctions on Russia, which is a more conservative and Christian nation today. But they do not join forces to impose sanctions on the Islamic Saudis, who were responsible for the 9/11.
Daily Mail said Trump “signed the [sanctions] bill, which he wasn’t happy about, in private.” Trump is being forced to do the neocons’ will. Why do not U.S. evangelical leaders, churches and organizations resist and sue neocons? It is time to confront neocons in the Democratic Party and in the Republican Party.
Daily Mail also said that the sanctions bill contains provisions that “prevent the president from lifting [the sanctions] without approval from Congress — provisions that got drafted amid concerns Trump would lift or limit sanctions amid his frequent praise for Russian President Vladimir Putin and desire to improve ties between the two powers.”
The neocons in the Congress have tied Trump’s hands. Evangelical leaders, churches and organizations should helping Trump by suing the GOP for capitulating to the will of the neocons, Democrats and socialists and for forcing Trump to do the neocons’ will.
If McCain and his neocon hordes wanted to implement a neocon agenda in the U.S. government, especially affecting negatively Christians in other nations, he should have defeated Obama in 2008. He failed. He is not the president. And Pence should behave as Trump’s vice president, not as if he were McCain’s vice president.
If evangelicals wanted a neocon in the White House, they would have voted for McCain, not Trump. They chose Trump for his clearly anti-neocon speech.
Trump’s hands are tied by a Congress controlled by warmongering socialist Democrats and warmongering “conservative” Republicans who have capitulated to the neocons. What will evangelicals do to untie Trump?
It is time for evangelical leaders, churches and organizations to sue the GOP for the implementation of the original anti-neocon Trump Agenda.
U.S. evangelicals should also sue the GOP for the genocide of Christians in Syria and Iraq in the trail of U.S. interventions and invasions. Even Trump condemned the Bush invasion of Iraq.
It is time also for Christians around the world to pray that God may neutralize the neocons and their malevolent power in the U.S. government and in the U.S. military industrial complex.
With the information from Pilot Online and WND.
Recommended Reading: