Thursday, June 22, 2017

Reading the Far Left and Its Attack on Breitbart and BarbWire: Gay Perversion, Veiled and Overt


Reading the Far Left and Its Attack on Breitbart and BarbWire: Gay Perversion, Veiled and Overt

By Julio Severo
Breitbart and BarbWire have been accused of being “homophobic.” I know what is this because I am not strange to such attacks. Between The Lines News, a gay publication in Michigan, made a selection last week (in its printed and online publication): “Creep of the Week: Julio Severo.” (Originally published in its printed version 6/15/2017, Issue 2524, Between The Lines News.)
Its reason for naming Julio Severo a “creep”? Between The Lines News said,
“In a June 12 piece on Barbwire, a website named for its unique ability to make a thinking person’s brain bleed, Severo writes, ‘The homosexual movement became active in Brazil by direct cultural effect from America, including her politics and Hollywood.’”
The U.S. homosexual Facebook page “Pride USA” also posted: “Creep of the Week: Julio Severo.” (Link: http://archive.is/LEI72)
If the accusation from Between The Lines News is local and reaches only people in Michigan, other U.S. homosexual activists have made sure that Julio Severo and other “far right-wingers” may not escape national and international attention.
In an article titled “Reading the Far Right: Homophobia, Veiled and Overt,” The Advocate focused on Breitbart and BarbWire and their columnists. Breitbart and BarbWire are websites prominent among U.S. conservatives.
The Advocate is the biggest gay magazine in America and is, in its own words, “The World’s Leading News Source for LGBT.”
Is there a “homophobic” far-right movement in the United States? According to The Advocate, Breitbart and BarbWire are two examples of American far-right extremism.
The problem The Advocate sees in Breitbart:
“Breitbart, which claims not to embrace homophobia (that claim is questionable, and it certainly is full of transphobia), is basically making the argument that the LGBT rights movement used to be OK but has descended into left-wing insanity.”
The Advocate also said:
“The conversion of the Los Angeles Gay Pride march into the anti-Trump ‘#ResistMarch’ on Sunday marked the effective end of the gay rights movement,” wrote Breitbart senior editor at large Joel B. Pollak. “Once, the gay rights movement stood for tolerance: hence the rainbow flag, which is a symbol not only of pride but also of acceptance. But the message on Sunday was that lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and queer (LGBTQ) conservatives are unwelcome in that spectrum — and are, in fact, aiding the enemy.”
Pollak contended that the movement has changed “from a force for liberation into a tool for repression.”
Breitbart’s stance defending supposedly “conservative” homosexuals who are not welcome in the homosexual movement is not conservative or even Christian. Even so, The Advocate managed to find “lots of overt homophobia” in its “reading of the far-right media” — Breitbart!
The Advocate has a hard time accusing Breitbart of being “far right,” if this means “far conservative,” because one of Breitbart’s former editors, Milo Yiannopoulos, is openly homosexual.
Breitbart would have a hard time to label itself conservative, because genuine U.S. conservatism, especially evangelical conservatism (which is the most prevalent Christian conservatism in America), sees nothing conservative in homosexuality.
Breitbart’s idea that the LGBT rights movement used to be OK is nonsense. Since the days of Alfred Kinsey, who had malicious intent and helped the homosexual movement more than 60 years ago with his malicious sex “studies” (and his “ten percent population is homosexual” hoax, debunked by Dr. Judith Reisman), malicious intent is an integral part of the gay agenda’s history. So Breitbart is terribly mistaken on his view of homosexuality.
What is The Advocate’s problem with BarbWire?
The Advocate said:
“For a look at homophobic and transphobic religious right ideology, one has to go no further than BarbWire, which purports to offer a biblical worldview. It carried a column last week by Robert Oscar Lopez, pulling out the old canard that LGBT people are out to ‘recruit’ children.”
The Advocate is right about BarbWire offering a biblical worldview. Without such worldview, there is no real conservatism. And, yes, the homosexual movement is always preying on children. Or did we forget how revolted they are when parents try to protect their own children from predatory homosexuality?
In 2013, Russia approved a law banning homosexual propaganda to children and adolescents. Hell (Obama and his wicked State Department) was unleashed on Russia. There was a massive revolt from homosexual activists in the U.S. and Europe. Their revolt made appear that Russia had approved capital punishment for homosexuals.
After the ban, The Advocate sarcastically announced that its 2014 Person of the Year was Vladimir Putin, seen by Patheos, an American atheist website, as “the horrifically homophobic president of Russia and a committed opponent of all things pro-LGBT.”
For homosexual activists in the U.S. and Europe, a ban on homosexual propaganda to children is akin to killing homosexuals! The homosexual movement cannot see itself away from children.
Even today, Putin is attacked just because of the ban. Last Sunday, one of the world’s largest Gay “Pride” Parades in São Paulo, Brazil, depicted mockingly Putin as a “drag queen.”
In 2014, when I participated in a pro-family event at the Kremlin, Moscow, the American participants were fearful because U.S. homosexual activists were pressuring the Obama’s State Department to investigate them over their participation in this event. After all, Russia was suffering sanctions from Obama and his left-wing administration.
Not much has changed. Trump’s State Department has increased the Obama sanctions against Russia and has recognized June as Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender and Intersex (LGBTI) Pride Month — continuing the tradition of Obama’s State Department.
The U.S. government has not changed in its defense of homosexual interests against Russia, which has kept its ban on homosexual propaganda to children.
What did Robert Oscar Lopez say that infuriated The Advocate? He said “that recruiting children into the LGBT identity, and then locking them into it, is fundamental to the LGBT community’s survival.”
A ban on such recruiting is fundamental, but the U.S. coercive homosexual tactics, including with government assistance, have relentlessly chastised Russia. With such attitude, the U.S. government shows clearly that it will never protect children from predatory homosexuality.
The Advocate also said:
“In another column published by BarbWire last week, theology professor John Barber (it’s not clear if he’s related to site founder Matt Barber) asserted that there’s no such thing as a gay Christian — even a gay person who refrains from acting on same-sex desires, he said, can’t be a real Christian, because Jesus would have taken those desires away. ‘Without the dominion of sin being broken, the picture of the gay Christian is equivalent to a unicorn sighting,’ Barber wrote.”
That concept is rejected even by some Christian denominations that don’t approve of same-sex relationships, such as the Roman Catholic Church and the Mormon Church, which say a gay, lesbian, or bisexual person can be faithful to the church’s doctrine by remaining celibate.
Pause. If the Catholic Church really believes this way, this certainly explains the massive numbers of homosexual Catholic priests abusing boys! The Advocate added:
It’s also certainly contrary to the experiences of those who identify as gay and Christian. And some mainline Christian denominations are far more accepting, with the Episcopal Church, Presbyterian Church (USA), Evangelical Lutheran Church in America, and more offering church marriages to same-sex couples.
Apparently, The Advocate ignores the word apostasy, which is guided by a wicked and sick worldview. The Advocate ignores that the author of apostasy and the acceptance of homosexuality among Christian churches is Satan and his demons. The Advocate also ignores that the Author of all condemnation of homosexuality in the Bible is not man. It is God.
I like very much BarbWire’s biblical worldview. Sadly, Breitbart has not such worldview.
The Advocate’s worldview? Its inspiration comes the same author that causes apostasy among Christian churches.
Also, The Advocate did not forget me. It said:
Oh, and yet another BarbWire contributor, Julio Severo, spent a recent column excoriating Secretary of State Rex Tillerson for recognizing June as LGBT Pride Month. And even though Trump hasn’t issued a proclamation for Pride Month or scheduled a reception for it (as Obama did every year of his presidency), Severo saw Trump as complicit in the dreaded “homosexual agenda.”
“The same homosexual principles that drove U.S. diplomacy under Obama now drive the U.S. diplomacy under Trump,” Severo wrote. “The only difference is that while Obama was vocal about these principles, Trump gives a tacit support, by allowing his own administration to speak for himself. If the saying ‘silence means assent’ is correct, Trump’s ‘silence’ is a message.”
Oh, and by “homosexual principles” he seems to mean the condemnation of anti-LGBT persecution around the world. “Obama used the U.S. government to lead the world, by his bad example, into accepting the homosexual lifestyle as normal,” Severo commented. “By tacit or explicit support, the Trump administration is leading the world in the same bad example.” Severo also gave credence to the hate-fueled stereotype that gay people prey on children.
If I condemned Obama’s State Department for its homosexual propaganda, why should I spare Trump’s State Department over the same propaganda?
Regarding a “stereotype that gay people prey on children,” gay “conservative” Milo Yiannopoulos lost his job as a Breitbart editor after his interests in pedophilia were exposed.
Homosexuals, even “conservative” homosexuals, have a special interest in children. Yiannopoulos has proved it.
If there were no connection between homosexuality and sex abuse of boys, the Catholic Church would have no scandal of homosexual priests abusing boys.
This is not the first time The Advocate attacks me. In 2011 The Advocate criticized me because I defended a child and her biological mother against a homosexual predator. You can read the whole story here: “World’s biggest gay magazine: no compassion and tolerance for a former lesbian and her daughter.”
Yet, what is The Advocate’s reason for depicting BarbWire and Breitbart as “far right”? Some 40 years ago a conservative publication hiring open homosexual Milo Yiannopoulos as an editor would be seen as far liberal and far left-wing.
The U.S. culture has changed and rotted so much that homosexualists have become excessively demanding. Forty years ago, you were labeled a leftist and homosexualist if you only supported gay “marriage” without subscribing to every other tenet of the homosexual gospel.
Today, if you subscribe to every homosexual tenet, including on “marriage” and adoption, but disagrees on coercive homosexual tactics, you are labeled “far right-winger,” “fascist” and “Nazi.” For The Advocate’s nasty worldview, if you do not support totally, in every point, the gay agenda, you are not friend. You are enemy. This reality is also applicable to Trump, who has let his State Department promote homosexual propaganda but he disagrees on coercive homosexual tactics. Trump has become an enemy not because he fights the gay agenda (which in fact he does not fight), but just because he has not satisfied all wishes from homosexualists and their agenda.
Even though Breitbart and Trump may hire thousands and thousands of copies of Milo Yiannopoulos, Peter Thiel and other “conservative” homosexuals, The Advocate and other far-left-wing activists will keep accusing them of “homophobic,” “far right-wing,” “fascist” and, of course, their favorite insulting label: “Nazi.”
By the way, according to German author and professor Lothar Machtan, in his book “The Hidden Hitler” (Basic Books, 2001), Adolf Hitler was a homosexual. In his book “The Pink Swastika” (Veritas Aeterna, 1995), author Scott Lively contends that many Nazi leaders were homosexual.
Hitler and his Nazi movement were what the U.S. homosexual movement is today. Oppressive, repressive and dictatorial. But they accuse real conservatives of what homosexualists are.
I disagree with Breitbart’s compromised stance against the gay agenda and I agree with BarbWire’s biblical stance, but if for The Advocate “far right” means radicalism against homosexuals and if BarbWire and Breitbart, which do not kill homosexuals or endorse their killing, are “far right,” what are Saudi Arabia and other Islamic nations that kill homosexuals?
If The Advocate is concerned about real radicalism against homosexuals, it should make a list of Islamic nations that kill homosexuals. It should pressure Trump and his State Department to do to Saudi Arabia and other Muslim nations that kill homosexuals just as what Obama’s State Department did to Russia and what Trump’s State Department does to Russia: sanctions, sanctions and more sanctions.
Yet, Obama had no such concern. Trump also has not. And what has The Advocate done? After condemning BarbWire and Breitbart, and sparing all Islamic nations, The Advocate condemned NRATV — the National Rifle Association’s online video channel — and other conservative channels for saying that a Muslim committed the worst terrorist attack on U.S. homosexuals — the mass shooting at Pulse gay nightclub in Orlando June 12, 2016.
If it was not a Muslim, who was? BarbWire and Breitbart? Julio Severo?
For The Advocate, is it impossible for Muslims to be responsible for terror attacks against homosexuals? In contrast, is it impossible for BarbWire and Breitbart not to be culprit of “homophobia”?
This is sheer insanity and hypocrisy: To condemn the innocent and spare the culprit!
Trump needs to understand what Obama did not understand: the intrinsically dishonest and Nazi nature of the homosexual movement.
He needs BarbWire’s worldview, not Breitbart’s worldview, guiding his administration. And he should stop his administration from doing what Obama did: to bully Russia over its ban on homosexual propaganda to children.
Putin is right. Russia is right. A ban on homosexual propaganda to children is necessary.
BarbWire and its conservative biblical worldview are right. A ban on recruiting children into the LGBT identity is fundamental.
Yet, while Russia under Putin has successfully implemented its ban on homosexual propaganda to children, the Trump administration and its State Department have given no room for implementing BarbWire’s conservative biblical worldview to ban recruiting children into the LGBT identity.
Trump needs BarbWire in his administration. If he embraces BarbWire and its biblical worldview, The Advocate will certainly name him Person of the Year.
Conservative Christians will name him Protector of Children forever!
Breitbart’s worldview, which embraces the illusion of a conservative homosexuality, is insufficient to defeat The Advocate’s far left-wing worldview and its veiled and overt gay perversion. But BarbWire’s worldview, which is biblical, not far right, is more than enough.
Recommended Reading:

Tuesday, June 20, 2017

Facebook, Censorship, Profanity, Name-Calling and Foul Language


Facebook, Censorship, Profanity, Name-Calling and Foul Language

By Julio Severo
What is free speech for Facebook? Monday, immediately after I posted the title and link of my latest article (Brazilian Neighbors Are Ordered to Pay US$4,500 For Calling a Homosexual “Fag” http://bit.ly/2sMZlZg), I received a communication from Facebook showing exactly this title and link and saying that my account would be blocked for thirty days, effective June 19, for supposedly violating Facebook guidelines.
Sure enough, since Monday I am unable to post, like, interact and answer contacts in my own Facebook account.
June 20, I sent this message to Facebook:
Based on a report of Globo, which is the biggest news outlet in Brazil, I wrote an article about a homosexual being insulted and the insulters condemned in court. In the text, I made it very clear that I oppose name-calling. Yet, Facebook blocked me for thirty days. This is censorship!
This post was the reason you presented for you to block me: Brazilian Neighbors Are Ordered to Pay US$4,500 For Calling a Homosexual “Fag” http://bit.ly/2sMZlZg
Is this enough reason to block a user?
I have reported some posts from abusive users containing name-calling and foul and aggressive language (because I hate name-calling and foul language), and you answered to me that you cannot remove or block them because this is only an issue of different views.
Why then block me when I did not defend name-calling and foul language? Why block me when I clearly condemned name-calling and foul language? If this is not CENSORSHIP, what is it?
Is there base for you to block me over an article condemning name-calling and foul language?
Please, review your baseless decision!
Homosexualist users, in Brazil and the U.S., express a lot of profanity, name-calling and dirty language against me and other Christians. In fact, few minutes ago, the U.S. homosexual Facebook page “Pride USA” posted: “Creep of the Week: Julio Severo.” (Link: http://archive.is/LEI72) Last week, the U.S. homosexual newspaper Between The Lines, which has a Facebook page, also published, in its printed and online versions, an article titled “Creep of the Week: Julio Severo.” Has Facebook already considered banning their Facebook pages? Has Facebook already considered banning profanity, name-calling and dirty language by homosexual users against Christians?
There is a lot of profanity, name-calling and dirty language in the Facebook universe. If Facebook intends to block them, users should respect such decision but the Facebook staff should be intelligent to understand that in no way my banned post (with my blocked account) endorses profanity, name-calling and dirty language.
So what is Facebook’s intent in blocking Christian user Julio Severo from posting, liking and interacting in his own account for thirty days?
If this is not censorship, what is it?
Recommended Reading:
Recommended Reading on Foul Language:

Monday, June 19, 2017

Baptist Minister Says Homosexual “Love” Is Blessed by God in One of The World’s Largest Gay “Pride” Parades in Brazil


Baptist Minister Says Homosexual “Love” Is Blessed by God in One of The World’s Largest Gay “Pride” Parades in Brazil

By Julio Severo
One of the world’s largest gay “pride” parades happened in São Paulo, Brazil, last Sunday, but its biggest surprise was not nudity and sex acts, which are routine in this homosexual event.
The surprise was José Barbosa Júnior, a progressive Baptist minister who delivered the opening address at the Gay Parade in São Paulo, suggesting that sodomy, or sex between two men, is “love.”
He was given just one minute of fame, and he used this minute not to speak of Jesus’s love for sinners, but to exalt the homosexual sin as “love.” He disgraced the Gospel to make a name for himself.
In a video recording his very short address, he said,
Good afternoon, São Paulo.
I come in the name of the “Jesus Heals Homophobia” Movement to ask forgiveness from the LGBT community for all the mess that the Evangelical Church made to you all these years. I want to say, to make it very clear here, that Malafaia, Feliciano and many others do not represent all the evangelicals in Brazil. Evangelicals love, yes. We are here to say that all kind of love is blessed by God. You can yes have fun and love because God is with you.
The Evangelical Caucus is a disgrace to the Gospel and to all churches.
So I wish strength, to every one of you, for a totally secular State, always. Thank you very much.
You can watch him in his own words at the São Paulo Gay Parade in this video: https://youtu.be/ytsl6E9jouo

If sodomy, or sex between two men, were normal and approved by God and His Word, the Baptist minister would be absolutely right and all the evangelical community should welcome his reprimand with contrition.
Yet, sodomy, or sex between two men, is abnormal and disapproved by God and His Word. In fact, God does not call it “love.” God says: “You shall not lie with a male as with a woman; it is an abomination.” (Leviticus 18:22 ESV) For God, sex between two men is sheer abomination.
So José Barbosa Júnior misrepresented God and His Word to homosexual sinners. How to explain his inspiration to act against God’s Word? The Bible says:
“Now the Spirit expressly says that in later times some will depart from the faith by devoting themselves to deceitful spirits and teachings of demons, through the insincerity of liars whose consciences are seared.” (1 Timothy 4:1-2 ESV)
About the Baptist minister, the Bible says:
“For such men are false apostles, deceitful workmen, disguising themselves as apostles of Christ. And no wonder, for even Satan disguises himself as an angel of light. So it is no surprise if his servants, also, disguise themselves as servants of righteousness. Their end will correspond to their deeds.” (2 Corinthians 11:11-15 ESV)
The Bible also says:
“What happened to Sodom and Gomorrah and the cities near them is an example for us of the punishment of eternal fire. The people of these cities suffered the same fate that God’s people and the angels did, because they committed sexual sins and engaged in homosexual activities.” (Jude 1:7 GWV)
Most participants in the São Paulo Gay Parade did not know it, and the Baptist minister denied to them the truth. Jesus came to the world not to exalt sin, but to deliver people from sin.
Homosexual organizers said 3 million people participated in Sao Paulo’s 21st annual gay “pride” parade, but officials did not venture to release a crowd estimate, because in all the past events the numbers were greatly inflated.
The parade’s motto this year was: “Whatever our beliefs, no religion is law. Everyone for a secular State.”
Organizer Claudia Regina said, “Our main enemies today are religious fundamentalists.” By religion, she meant only Christianity, not Afro-Brazilian religions, whose representative, Grammy award-winning singer Daniela Mercury, performed at the parade. Mercury, who is a Brazilian lesbian, has been a UNICEF children’s ambassador for over 20 years.
In a homosexual event in the United Nations in 2015, she said, “I am not Cinderella or sleeping beauty… I am a bad queen. A bad, bad, queen of Macumba” — which is term connected to an Afro-Brazilian religion similar to voodoo. In Christian terms, Macumba is Brazilian witchcraft. Homosexuality is celebrated in the Afro-Brazilian religions and, even though they dislike Christianity, homosexual activists in Brazil are fond of Afro-Brazilian religions.
In 2013, Mercury said that Christians opposing gay “marriage” deserve jail, even though her own mother has also opposed it.
Adopting a political tone, homosexuals in the São Paulo Gay Parade held up signs depicting U.S. President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin as “drag queens.”
They were against Putin because he has denied to them whole cake of homosexual privileges, especially with his law banning homosexual propaganda to children. He has given them no slice of the cake.
They were against Trump because the U.S. president has given them only slices, and they are not satisfied with it. They want the whole cake!
Both Trump and Putin do not understand spiritual realities. But he who should understand — Rev. José Barbosa Júnior — behaved as a deceitful Christian when he said to the multitude of homosexual sinners: “We are here to say that all kind of love is blessed by God. You can yes have fun and love because God is with you.”
The Theology of Integral Mission, which is the Protestant version of Liberation Theology, led José Barbosa Júnior to the perversion of the Gay Theology and to pervert the true meaning of Jesus’s love.
With information from the Associated Press, NBC News and Friday Fax.
Recommended Reading: