Were Brazilian Protests an Anti-Marxist Counter-Revolution?
By Julio
Severo
Socialist
Brazilian President Dilma Rousseff faced, according to FoxNews, massive
demonstrations protesting against corruption and calling for her impeachment
last Sunday (March 15).
Kincaid
said, “Such
a development would be a major blow to the anti-American left in Latin America,
which has been operating since 1990 under the rubric of the São Paulo Forum, a
pro-communist movement started by Rousseff’s predecessor, Luiz Inácio Lula de
Silva, and Fidel Castro.”
The
Brazilian protests were not about Marxism. Any anti-Marxism expression was an
isolated event. The protests were, according to Reuters, about “a sluggish
economy, rising prices and corruption.”
When
Brazilians are discontent, they protest. The same demonstrators would protest
Barack Obama if discontent with him.
Many
Brazilians who live in the U.S. are discontent with Rousseff, but not with
Obama.
Last
year, Obama announced
a major amnesty benefiting millions of immigrants. Many of those benefited are
Brazilians, who are fleeing from the leftist hell in Brazil, but by being aided
by Obama, they are also aiding to produce a leftist hell in the U.S.
A
Brazilian friend helped spread Kincaid’s article about an alleged “anti-Marxist
counter-revolution” in Brazil. Frequently, he attacks Rousseff, because she is
a Marxist. But he praised Obama’s amnesty. I told him that conservative
Americans did not like Obama’s amnesty because it is a handout. He answered
that the important thing is Brazilian immigrants need it and so he praised
such wonderful policy for immigrants.
In
general terms, this is the profile of an “anti-Marxist” Brazilian in Kincaid’s
piece.
A
true anti-Marxist counter-revolution would be characterized especially by a
moral fight against two fundamental banners of the U.S. and Brazilian Left:
abortion and the homosexual agenda.
Yet,
a fight against abortion and the tyrannical homosexual agenda had no place in
what Kincaid termed “anti-Marxist counter-revolution” in Brazil.
In
fact, Monday (March 16), just one day after the massive demonstrations,
Catholic Levy Fidelix, a former Brazilian presidential candidate, was condemned
to pay a fine of R$ 1 million (over US$300,000) in a public civil action filed
by the LGBT movement. There was no massive or even small demonstration in his
support.
He
was condemned because in the last Brazilian presidential election he made
pro-family declarations. The other main contenders — Dilma Rousseff, Aécio
Neves and Marina Silva — also lambasted him for his
pro-family view.
Evangelical
Marina was the candidate of the Brazilian Socialist Party, and was
heavily involved in the anti-Rousseff protests. Does a socialist fighting a socialist
look like an “anti-Marxist counter-revolution”?
Because
he knew I am a Brazilian, a minister with some evangelical churches in the U.S.
praised Silva, saying that she is a conservative evangelical politician who
absolutely fights abortion and the gay agenda. I asked him where he had read
it, because in her history, Silva never undertook such fight. I emphasized that
she always was leftwing. He said that he had read about her strong evangelical “conservatism”
in the U.S. mainstream media.
Neves,
admired by most demonstrators, had his
candidacy built by Marxist strategist David Axelrod, a longtime top
Obama adviser. Does a socialist helping a socialist look like an “anti-Marxist
counter-revolution”?
Even
so, Kincaid said, “President Barack Obama’s fellow Marxist, Dilma Rousseff.”
It is
correct to say that Obama and Rousseff are Marxist. But they are not fellows.
Rousseff and her administration have had a very hard time with Obama and his
administration because of NSA and its economic espionage against Brazil.
There
is a big difference between pro-U.S. Marxists and anti-U.S. Marxists. Neves is
in the former group; Rousseff is in the latter one. Yet, Rousseff is not
totally anti-U.S. Her administration has faithfully supported every pro-sodomy
measure by the U.S. in the United Nations.
 |
| Fidel Castro and Aécio Neves |
In
this point, you could think then that the massive protests were pro-U.S. and
pro-Obama Marxists protesting anti-U.S. Marxists. Hardly an “anti-Marxist
counter-revolution”!
Basically,
Brazilians protesting Rousseff because of rising prices would also protest
Obama if he backtracked in his amnesty policy benefiting millions of
immigrants, including Brazilians. While Obama does not backtrack in his
handout, Brazilian immigrants in the U.S. will keep attacking only Rousseff.
What
about if Socialist Aécio Neves and environmentalist Marina Silva agreed to
denounce the São Paulo Forum to destroy Rousseff’s socialist party, the Workers’
Party? Would Marxism be politically destroyed in Brazil? No. There is a bigger
threat: the National Conference of Bishops of Brazil (NCBB).
Professor
Hermes Rodrigues Nery, a prominent Catholic pro-life leader in Brazil, said
recently that NCBB is “an extension of the São Paulo Forum.” It was a generous
charge.
Actually,
Marxist NCBB is credited, by many Catholic conservative and pro-life leaders,
as the original creator of the Workers’ Party. And as a mother nurses her baby,
NCBB nursed its red monster.
Above
all, long before the São Paulo Forum’s birth, there was a NCBB guiding Brazil,
the largest Catholic nation in the world, into socialism.
Ignoring
the Brazilian reality, Cliff Kincaid said, “The protests in Brazil are giving
hope to those who see an opportunity to defeat Marxism in the Western
hemisphere.”
If
Brazil is the best example of an “anti-Marxist counter-revolution” that Kincaid
is able to see, then it is no wonder that Obama is at the White House.
Immediately
after Rousseff’s reelection, her opponents made
a petition in the White House asking help from Obama. Nowhere the
petition mentioned the threat of abortion policies and the homosexual agenda.
But it mentioned “São Paulo Forum” and said, “We call a White House position in
relation to communist expansion in Latin America.”
Oh,
my God! Does people asking help from a socialist produce an “anti-Marxist
counter-revolution”?
The
most important Marxist today is at the White House. Brazilian philosopher Olavo
de Carvalho, quoted often by Kincaid, said recently: “Because I am just a legal
resident and not an American citizen, I cannot get involved actively in the
anti-Obama fight, but I believe that this fight is the ONLY thing that matters
today.”
The
most important fight — against Obama and his wicked policies — has been one of
the main focuses of my ministry, because the Obama administration is impacting
the whole world. I would not avoid this calling even if threatened of losing a
chance to get a U.S. citizenship.
Of course,
the other huge threat is Islam, the greatest murder machine
in the history. Its main
victims have been Christians.
But Kincaid
(and Obama!) has been focusing his attacks and provocations on Russia. Kincaid’s
radicalism does not spare even pro-family events in Russia. Last year, an
international conservative pro-family congress was held at the Kremlin,
attended even by an Inter-American Institute (IAI) fellow. But Kincaid
preferred to join the U.S. homosexual militant and radical Marxist chorus who attacked
the event and the Russian laws banning homosexual propaganda for
children.
Another
IAI member recommended the book “The
War Against Putin: What the Government-Media Complex Isn’t Telling You About
Russia” to me and made it clear that he disagreed with the radical criticism of some Americans against the Russian president.
While
Kincaid and other ultranationalist Americans are heavily busy attacking Russia,
Obama and neocons are trying to destroy pro-family cultures by advancing their
Marxist revolution and imposing around the world their pro-sodomy, pro-Marxism,
pro-abortion and pro-Islam policies.
To denounce,
expose and fight Obama’s pro-abortion, pro-sodomy and pro-Islam Marxist revolution
— that is the ONLY thing that matters today.
Portuguese
version of this article: Os protestos anti-Dilma foram uma contrarrevolução
antimarxista?
Source: Last Days Watchman
Recommended Reading:
Posts
