Showing posts with label Muslims. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Muslims. Show all posts

Friday, March 16, 2018

British false flags, again? Theresa May expels Russian diplomats, but not Islamic rapists


British false flags, again? Theresa May expels Russian diplomats, but not Islamic rapists

By Julio Severo
In a report titled “UK to expel 23 Russian diplomats over spy poisoning,” CNN said,
“The UK will expel 23 Russian diplomats from the country after concluding that the Russian state is responsible for the attempted murder of a former Russian spy and his daughter on British soil, a step that marks a serious escalation of hostilities between London and Moscow.”
The British media has praised Prime Minister Theresa May for her diplomatic punishment on Russia. It is very interesting that the left-wing press, including CNN, has sided with U.K and opposed Russia.
Theresa May
The CNN report, which is hostile to Russia and favorable to U.K., added a statement by May, who said,
“For those who seek to do us harm, my message is simple. You are not welcome here.”
Who else is not welcome in U.K.?
This week, May’s conservative government banned from U.K. a conservative journalist for criticism of Islam. See the Daily Mail report “Right-wing journalist Lauren Southern denied entry to UK, purportedly over criticism of Islam.”
Why are critics of Islam denied entry to U.K.? Why are not they welcome?
Currently, little British girls are suffering an epidemic of rapes by Muslim immigrants, and Theresa May and her supposedly conservative government are able to do… nothing to protect them. See the Gatestone Institute’s report “British Girls Raped by Muslim Gangs on ‘Industrial Scale.’”
Are rapists of British girls welcome in U.K.? So why does not May expel them?
By orientation of May’s “conservative” government, Facebook banned Britain First pages and the profiles of all its leaders, because they are critical of Islam. See the WND report “Facebook bans Britain First pages.”
Months ago, Trump shared a video of Britain First about Islamic violence. Now, Britain First has been banned, because the priority of Theresa May and her “conservative” government is cowardice and submission to Islam.
There are vastly bigger problems in U.K. than a Russian spy being supposedly attacked by the nation that trained him.
The attack on the spy was too brazen, too obvious, and U.K. has proved that they are capable of using false flags and protecting real criminals, including Islamic rapists.
Does U.K. ignore false flags tactics?
A large false flag attack may have occurred in World War II. The US did not want to go to war to help England. Then the British secret service detonated a bomb in New York, simulating a Nazi terrorist attack. That was enough for the US to dispatch, for free, many armaments to England. See the Daily Mail report “Did the British plant a bomb at the 1940 World's Fair to kill two NYPD officers and bring the U.S. into World War II? The unsolved case of how the real-life James Bond was dispatched to New York City by Churchill to beat the Germans at any cost.”
Even if the attack on a Russian spy was really Russian, Trump recognized last year that in the same way Russians kill people, Americans also do. Obviously, he meant that CIA and other intelligence agencies know how to exterminate real and perceived enemies. The Daily Mail report said, “You think our country is so innocent?”: Trump doubles down on “respect” for Putin and says “US has a lot of killers” when told Russian president is “a killer” for murdering journalists.
Is this not true also regarding U.K.? Do not British intelligence agencies also exterminate real and perceived enemies?
In fact, the Israel newspaper Ynet ran an interesting headline: “Russian lawmaker: US had access to nerve agent.” If this is true, both U.K. and U.S. intelligence agencies could have made a false flag attempted murder of the former Russian spy.
In the past, I could believe U.K., even without knowing about its alleged false flag attack in New York.
Now, under Muslim domination (with London occupied by a Muslim mayor), and U.K. protecting Muslims and silencing critics of Islam and not protecting thousands of little British girls whom Muslim rapists call “white trash,” is U.K. credible yet?
I do not think so.
There is a toxic Muslim domination in U.K., and Theresa May is unable to see it.
I cannot send this comment to British newspapers that attack Russia, because my comment contains criticism of Islam and it will be automatically banned. The largest U.K. newspaper, Daily Mail, has systematically banned all my comments critical of Islam. Yet, if I criticize Christians, Daily Mail is very likely to approve my comments!
A toxic Muslim domination is reality in London, in raped British girls and in Theresa May’s cowardice. I am not even allowed to mention in Daily Mail about such Islamic rapes, because cowardly U.K. does not recognize the suffering of its little girls. For U.K., respect for violent Islam is more important than protecting its little girls.
In the case of Muslims, it is not necessary to use false flags to indicate that they are violent and rapists. Muslims are more violent than all the false flags that U.K. has ever used. British victims of rape are witnesses of its violence.
So, instead of attacking Russia, with false flags or not, why does not Theresa May attack Muslims who are raping British girls and punish the British media that censor and banish conservative content exposing Islamic violence and rapes?
Why cannot May say to Islamic rapists “For those who seek to do harm to our daughters, my message is simple. You are not welcome here”?
Cannot she also expel diplomats from Saudi Arabia and other Islamic nations that arm and fund ISIS, al-Qaida and other terror groups that rape and slaughter Christians?
Recommended Reading:

Monday, July 03, 2017

Reading the Far Left: Left-Wing Wingnuts Call Conservatives What They Are


Reading the Far Left: Left-Wing Wingnuts Call Conservatives What They Are

By Julio Severo
Out in far-left media land, there’s a whole lotta homosexual paranoia going on.
Yes, in the past week, The Advocate called conservatives “wingnuts,” and HotSpots, the most important homosexual magazine in Florida, gloatingly announced: “Creep of the Week: Brazilian Writer & Blogger Julio Severo.”
Actually, several other U.S. homosexual websites, Facebook pages and magazines have also made the same announcement.
If I call a homosexual activist a creep, these same websites, Facebook pages and magazines will sue me and call me “homophobe” for “reviling” one of them.
In fact, my Facebook account has been blocked for 30 days immediately after my post on a news report about Brazilian neighbors being ordered to pay thousands of dollars for calling a homosexual a “fag.” My post was very clear that I am opposed to name-calling and foul language. Even so, Facebook censored me.
Homosexual activists call me “creep” even on Facebook pages and there is no censorship. No court orders them to pay me thousands of dollars for reviling me. They have been free to revile me. Conclusion: If I want to be free to revile, I should embrace homosexuality. If Facebook would try to block me, I could use the homosexual card and cry “homophobia.” If some magazine or website would call me a “creep,” I could also use the homosexual card and cry “homophobia.” All the media and authorities would support me against the “homophobes.” And I could sue all of “homophobes.”
But what really stands out on extreme left-wing sites are virulently anti-Christian columns, which portray homosexual activists as “victims,” even though the alleged victims are busy attacking Christians — and not attacking Muslims.
Again, The Advocate attacked BarbWire, an evangelical Christian website.
The Advocate is the biggest gay magazine in America and is, in its own words, “The World’s Leading News Source for LGBT.”
Speaking of BarbWire, one of its contributors has been reading this column. Julio Severo even played off the title of one of our recent entries; his column is headlined “Reading the Far Left and Its Attack on Breitbart and BarbWire: Gay Perversion, Veiled and Overt.” The illustration was a rainbow flag with a hammer and sickle — for you youngsters out there, the hammer and sickle were on the flag of the former Soviet Union. Nice touch, BarbWire!
Severo noted that we took issue with a Breitbart column that essentially said the LGBT movement used to be OK but has now gone too far left. We expressed a doubt that Breitbart writer Joel B. Pollak would ever actually have supported LGBT rights, but Severo contended that Breitbart cannot truly be conservative because it once employed Milo Yiannapoulos, a gay man.
“Genuine U.S. conservatism, especially evangelical conservatism (which is the most prevalent Christian conservatism in America), sees nothing conservative in homosexuality,” Severo wrote. However, the reason Yiannopoulos found fans at Breitbart was most likely his willingness to at least appeal to racism, transphobia, and other prejudices that are rejected by both liberals and mainstream conservatives. He went too far by appearing to endorse relationships between men and teenage boys, though, leading to the loss of his job as Breitbart tech editor.
Severo went on to defend a BarbWire column The Advocate found objectionable because the author, Robert Oscar Lopez, claimed LGBT people are out to “recruit” children. “The homosexual movement is always preying on children,” Severo asserted. He further defended anti-LGBT columns by himself and other BarbWire contributors, and said Christian churches that accept LGBT people are driven by Satan.
What have I written that The Advocate read that “LGBT people are driven by Satan”? In response to The Advocate saying that there are Christian churches supportive of the homosexual sin, I said,
“Apparently, The Advocate ignores the word apostasy, which is guided by a wicked and sick worldview. The Advocate ignores that the author of apostasy and the acceptance of homosexuality among Christian churches is Satan and his demons. The Advocate also ignores that the Author of all condemnation of homosexuality in the Bible is not man. It is God.”
Christian churches that welcome and love homosexuals to help them find Christ’s deliverance are guided by God, who wants homosexuals delivered from their sin. But Christian churches that welcome the homosexual sin, which is clearly condemned by God, are guided by Satan.
“If The Advocate is concerned about real radicalism against homosexuals, it should make a list of Islamic nations that kill homosexuals. It should pressure Trump and his State Department to do to Saudi Arabia and other Muslim nations that kill homosexuals just as what Obama’s State Department did to Russia and what Trump’s State Department does to Russia: sanctions, sanctions and more sanctions.”
The Advocate answered,
“We do not hesitate to condemn any violence based in religious fanaticism. However, we do not condemn the religion itself, be it Islam, Christianity, or anything else.”
Obviously (and this is massively obvious) The Advocate has never sarcastically announced some Saudi Muslim leader as “Person of Year.” But it has sarcastically announced Vladimir Putin as its 2014 “Person of the Year” immediately after Russia approved a law banning homosexual propaganda to children and adolescents. Russia is the largest Christian Orthodox nation in the world.
It is easy to lambast evangelicals, Catholics and Orthodox Christians. Why not lambast Muslims?
I have never seen a homosexual announcement saying: “Creep of the Week: The Saudi Islamic Dictator.”
It very easy for The Advocate to spare some “Christian” churches from attacks, because apostate churches twist the Bible to say that God approves the homosexual sin. Yet, homosexual activists attack the real, non-apostate churches that do not kill homosexuals and that preach, according to the Bible, that God condemns homosexuality.
In contrast, Muslim nations that champion murder of homosexuals are never blacklisted by homosexual activists.
The Advocate has been free to advocate the homosexual sin in the United States, the largest Protestant nation in the world. But would The Advocate be free to advocate the same sin in Saudi Arabia, the most Islamic nation in the world?
Sadly, current America grants excessive freedom to homosexualists — a nonsense never imagined by the U.S. Founders, including the first U.S. president, George Washington, who loathed homosexuality and expelled homosexuals, but never killed them.
As recorded in “The Writings of George Washington” (March 10, 1778, 11:83-84, U.S. Government Printing Office, 1934), George Washington ordered: “At a General Court Marshall … Lieutt. Enslin of Colo. Malcom’s Regiment tried for attempting to commit sodomy, with John Monhort a soldier … and do sentence him to be dismiss’d the service with Infamy. His Excellency the Commander-in-Chief approves the sentence and with Abhorrence and Detestation of such Infamous Crimes orders Liett. Enslin to be drummed out of Camp tomorrow morning by all the Drummers and Fifers in the Army never to return.” (information from William Federer.)
In the other extreme, Saudi Arabia grants no freedom to homosexuals and, additionally, kills them.
So, before attacking allegedly “homophobic” Christians who do not kill homosexuals, I challenge The Advocate and all its supporters to travel to Saudi Arabia and protest in loco homophobic Muslims killing homosexuals. They should hold up signs calling the Saudi dictator a creep. Next, they should return to the U.S. to report if they were successful — of course, if they are allowed to exit Saudi Arabia alive.
Recommended Reading:

Tuesday, April 07, 2015

Islam, to surpass Christianity by 2070, will be only major religion to increase faster than world’s population


Islam, to surpass Christianity by 2070, will be only major religion to increase faster than world’s population 

By Julio Severo
There will be more Muslims than Christians in the world in less than eighty years, according to a Pew Research Center’s report.
The report said that while Christians will increase to 2.92 billion adherents by 2050, Muslims will reach 2.76 billion, making those religions about 30 percent of the world population. Muslims will outnumber Jews in the U.S. by 2050. Yet, the report said that by the end of this century, Islam will be the dominant religion in the world.
Several countries are also projected to have a different religious majority by 2050.
By 2050, 4 in 10 Christians are expected to be located in Africa. And Christians will no longer be a majority in the United Kingdom, France, Australia and the Netherlands, which will have large Muslim populations.
The DailyMail said that Islam “will thrive due to its young population and high fertility rates, with an average of 3.1 children per woman. The rate is well above the 2.1 replacement level — the minimum typically needed to maintain a stable population.”
The DailyMail added, “the fertility rate of Christians… is around 2.7 children per woman.”
Actually, Muslims have not high fertility rates. They have rates Christians and others always had for thousands of years. Yet, because of massive population control campaigns, especially in the 20th century, birthrates fell and keep falling.
“Wars, famines, religious revival and all kinds of things could change the picture,” said Dr. Conrad Hackett, the lead researcher and demographer for the Pew report.
Yet, even without a massive Islamic threat hanging on their heads, Christians are destroying the future of their families through family planning. God planning is out of their minds.
And now researchers can see that a nation or religion with more children will win the civilization battle. Children are an important natural resource for nations and civilizations. A few of them spells a weak culture and slow death.
Another distinguishing characteristic of many Muslims is that they are very protective of their many children and their education, while Christians who do not choose homeschooling often let their small number of children be indoctrinated at public schools by evolution, birth control and other pagan ideologies. Eventually, they lose the few children they have.
Reporting on the Pew Research Center’s report, the Associated Press stressed that the Christian population in the United States will suffer a drastic drop, while atheists and agnostics will increase. AP said, “Atheists, agnostics and people who don’t identify with a religion will increase in much of Europe and North America, but globally will drop from about 16 percent to 13 percent of the population. Within the U.S., people with no religious affiliation are projected to become more than a quarter of the population, while the share of Christians is expected to decrease from more than three-quarters to two-thirds.”
Family planning and child education under government control among Christians will result in few children committed to the God of their fathers.
How can Christians in America and other nations expect abundant supernatural resources from God and his inheritance when they despise his abundant natural resources and inheritance?
If Christians today had normal, large families as Christians had in the Bible times and if they spread the Gospel and made disciples as commanded by Jesus in Matthew 28:19-20, Muslims would have no increase in America, Europe and other traditionally Christian nations.
With the sacrifice of their families and children, Christians are surrendering their future and inheritance to Islam, which is the ideology behind of the most persecution and murder of Christians around the world today.
With information from the Associated Press, DailyMail and the New York Times.
Recommended Reading:

Sunday, February 15, 2015

British Artists Boycott Israel As One Million British Girls Are Raped by Muslim Gangs


British Artists Boycott Israel As One Million British Girls Are Raped by Muslim Gangs

By Julio Severo
In an initiative called “Artists for Palestine,” some 700 British artists, including Roger Waters, Brian Eno, Mike Leigh, Ken Loach and Richard Ashcroft, made a pledge, February 14, to boycott Israel in reaction to what they termed “the Palestinian catastrophe,” according to the Jerusalem Post.
Catastrophe? It is what is happening around Israel. Syria, Iraq and other Islamic nations around Israel are suffering: Muslims are killing Christians. In all the Muslim nations in the Middle East, the same pattern has repeated itself in a greater or lesser degree: Muslims killing Christians.
Why in the sea of violence in the Middle East are Muslims the aggressors and have an upper hand against Christians, but not against Israel?
Because Israel is the only Middle East non-Muslim nation able to defend herself.
Why are British artists annoyed at Israeli defense, but not worried or distressed about Christians being raped, tortured and slaughtered in Muslim nations around Israel? Is not U.K. a nation with Christian roots? Is U.K. unable to feel compassion for Christians oppressed by Muslims?
Why are British artists annoyed at Israel? Are Jews raping British girls? In fact, if the British people were informed in World War II that Nazi soldiers intended to invade U.K. to rape British girls, the British population would react and fight in rage for their girls.
If the British people were told today that Jews intend to invade U.K. to rape British girls, the British population would react and fight in rage for their girls.
Yet, this is exactly what is happening. U.K. is being invaded, but not by Nazis or Jews. According to a gut-wrenching exposé by FrontPage Magazine, Muslim gangs are inflicting sexual exploitation on British girls, and British officials believe that as many as one million girls may have been victimized, describing it as a “national disaster” that requires some response to deal with the “horror.”
So, when are British artists going to press the British government to pledge to boycott all immigration of Islamic rapists?
When are they going to launch an “Artists for British Girls” initiative?
When are they going to react in rage to the national disaster and horror of Islamic sexual exploitation of British girls?
Or to protect British girls is less important than being labeled a bigot, racist or Islamophobe by the liberal media?
Whenever Israel defends herself against Palestinian Muslims, the same labels are used against the Jews.
The apathetic British government and its people, who have not protected their daughter from Muslims, have no right to condemn Israel for protecting her people and their daughters.
If you want to win the war against Islamic terror, to protect British girls and to protect Christians and Israel from Islamic enemies, you should be ready for the war of labels waged by liberals.
Recommended Reading:

Sunday, January 04, 2015

Facebook and Twitter have been accused by Muslims in U.K. of allowing ‘Islamophobia’ from users


Facebook and Twitter have been accused by Muslims in U.K. of allowing ‘Islamophobia’ from users

Anti-Islamic posts have been reported as ‘racist’

By Julio Severo
Are you shocked and horrified by watching beheadings, tortures and slaughters of Christians by ISIS and other Islamic groups? You are not alone. Islamic groups in the Western nations, especially in U.K., are also ‘shocked’ and ‘horrified’ — by anti-Muslim comments by users shocked and horrified by Islamic violence!
According to the DailyMail, Muslim groups in U.K. have been recording online anti-Islamic speech and reporting it to Twitter and Facebook.
They have reportedly brought many anti-Muslim messages to the attention of the social-media companies.
Fiyaz Mughal, director of Faith Matters, which runs a helpline called Tell MAMA, for victims of anti-Muslim ‘violence,’ said he was disappointed the sites were not taking a stronger stance.
He said, “It is morally unacceptable that social media platforms like Facebook and Twitter, which are vast profit-making companies, socially engineer what is right and wrong to say in our society when they leave up inflammatory, highly socially divisive and openly bigoted views.”
Mughal said that Tell MAMA regularly receives reports of anti-Muslim rhetoric and ‘hate’ from Muslim Facebook and Twitter users.
For Muslims, any anti-Muslim comment is ‘violence.’
In a statement Facebook said, “We take hate speech seriously and remove any content reported to us that directly attacks others based on their race, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sex, gender, sexual orientation…”
Facebook said that it is working with Faith Matters to find a solution against anti-Muslim posts from its users.
The DailyMail report used the grossest examples of anti-Islamic views to justify censorship. But even when there is no gross anti-Islamic rhetoric, Facebook has censored. Some Christian Facebook users who have posted YouTube videos of Christians being beheaded by Muslims, just to draw attention to their horrible plight, have had their accounts blocked for several days. Their “anti-Muslim” posts, which included no dirty words or anti-Islamic violence, have been removed.
In the U.K., the pro-Islamic madness is out of control. There has been a wave of Islamic rapes of British ethnic girls and young women, but the English people, who were courageous to protect their land from Nazi enemies decades ago, today hand over their daughters to Islamic rapists. They are more fearful of being accused of ‘racism’ than seeing their daughters unprotected from Islamic rapists.
If Obama, Bush and Clinton are right in their frequent messages and propaganda that Islam is a “religion of peace,” so the many YouTube videos from ISIS beheading Christians are not what we see. They could be Christians beheading Muslims! In this case, Muslims in U.K. are right to report anti-Muslim speech.
In this case, Facebook and Twitter would be right to remove any speech against the propaganda of Islam as a “religion of peace.”
Yet, the reality does not follow the messages of Obama, Bush, Clinton and Islamic propagandists in the West.
Islam is the leading cause of oppression, persecution and martyrdom of Christians around the world. However, these poor people are supposed to die without complaining in Muslim lands. And we in Western lands have no right to complain about Muslims bringing suffering to them.
Anti-Christian censorship is rampant in Muslim lands, and the West wants to follow suit.
By the way, if Muslims in the West have their way, sooner or later this article will be labeled ‘racist’ or anti-Muslim ‘hate.’
With information of the DailyMail.
Recommended Reading:

Monday, December 08, 2014

Hillary Clinton: America should “empathize” and “show respect” to her enemies


Hillary Clinton: America should “empathize” and “show respect” to her enemies

By Julio Severo
Hillary Clinton, who is expected to run for president in 2016, has been criticized after saying that America should “empathize” and “show respect” to her enemies.
Hillary Clinton
Her speech, focused on the promotion of feminist leadership, was given at Georgetown University in Washington D.C., December 3, 2014.
Her feminist approach is for America to use “every possible tool and partner” to advance ‘peace.’ She elaborated that this approach means “showing respect, even for one’s enemies; trying to understand and, insofar as psychologically possible, empathize with their perspective and point of view.” 
How are we supposed to understand her speech? Who are these enemies of America?
We are left at least with three possibilities:
1. Muslims. Muslims, especially from Saudi Arabia, are behind the 9/11 terror attack. But if Clinton wants America to empathize with Muhammad’s followers, she came too late. George W. Bush was a pioneer in calling, immediately after 9/11, Islam a “religion of peace.” So, since Bush, we are left with an impression that Islam is not America’s enemy. If this is the case, Clinton is not referring to Muslims, who have been treated with extreme empathy by the U.S. government. The U.S. love affair with Saudi Arabia is legendary. In this perspective, Muslims are not the U.S. enemies.
2. Conservative Christians. That’s right. According to Whistleblower magazine, America’s enemies are not Islamic jihadists, but conservatives and Christians. Pro-life and pro-family work has been labeled terrorism by the Obama administration. In fact, under former Secretary Hillary Clinton, the U.S. State Department put homosexual rights as a top priority, and now it is not only sponsoring homosexual activism around the world, but has also committed itself to oppose international pro-family Christians engaged against the gay agenda. So obviously these Christians are, for Clinton and Obama, America’s enemies. Now, in an ultimate ‘merciful’ act, does Clinton want the U.S. government to ‘empathize’ and ‘show respect’ to these Christians?
3. Progressives. So her call is self-serving. The real enemies of America are individuals and institutions who want to disfigure her from her original intent. The Founding Fathers were mostly evangelical Christians and intended a nation especially to Christians. Hillary and her husband, former U.S. President Bill, oppose this original form. Obama does too. And by declaring that Islam is a “religion of peace,” even Bush opposed the Founding Fathers’ intent. So, basically, Hillary Clinton meant, “I want America to ‘empathize’ and ‘show respect’ to me, my husband, Obama, Bush and other U.S. presidents for every wicked pro-Islam act that put us on par with America’s enemies.”
Certainly, the Obama administration, the Clinton administration and, sadly, even the Bush administration would ‘empathize’ and ‘show respect’ to themselves. I have enclosed Bush because recently he called Bill Clinton his ‘brother.’ Well, if I called Clinton or Obama a ‘brother,’ I should be considered an enemy of America.
Besides, when Bush called Islam a ‘religion of peace,’ he lied to America and to the world. Clinton and Obama have agreed with and even promoted this lie. This has been deceptive propaganda to America and the world, especially because Islam is, by far, the biggest source of persecution and martyrdom for Christians around the world.
Clinton and Obama are progressive (socialist) Protestants. So they are pro-abortion and pro-sodomy. In contrast, Bush is a generally pro-life and anti-sodomy conservative evangelical. But all of them are proclaimers of Islam as a “religion of peace.” In this respect, all of them have been liars, to the detriment of many thousands of Christians, whose blood has been shed by Islamic butchers every year.
Should America be a friend of Islam? Should America be its chief proclaimer through deception and a sordid partnership with Turkey and Saudi Arabia? Is not proclaiming Islam as a “religion of peace” cowardice and complicity in its many crimes, genocides and slaughters of innocents?
So is it any wonder that, according Dr. Raymond Ibrahim, author of “Crucified Again: Exposing Islam’s New War on Christians,” it is a confirmed fact that America has become the chief facilitator of Christian persecution?
My question to the American people is: Should you ‘empathize’ and ‘show respect’ to Clinton, Obama, Bush and other fellow Americans while they ‘empathize’ and ‘show respect’ to Islam and aided and abetted America to become such facilitator?
With information from Daily Mail and Weekly Standard.
Recommended Reading: