Help! Facebook Is Censoring Bible Verses

By Julio Severo

Facebook gave me a message on February 15, 2018:

We Removed Something You Posted

It looks like something you posted doesn’t follow our Community Standards. We remove posts that attack people based on their race, ethnicity, national origin, religious affiliation, sexual orientation, gender or disability.

Levítico 18.22:

Não de deitarás com homem, como se fosse mulher; abominação é.

The concluding text, which is in Portuguese, was targeted and removed by Facebook. This post had been originally published by me on June 2015 on my Facebook account and its translation into English is:

Leviticus 18:22:

You shall not lie with a male as with a woman. It is an abomination.

Willing or not willing, Facebook treated Leviticus 18:22 directly as a “attack” on “people based on their… sexual orientation, gender.” That is, Facebook treated the Bible as a criminal book!

Does Facebook guidelines warn its users that the Bible is a criminal book?

Does Facebook’s Statement of Rights and Responsibilities warn its users that the Bible is a criminal book?

Right now, I am under a 30-day ban by Facebook, since January 28, because on August 2013, I had published a post exposing the misuse of public funds by well-known homosexual group in Brazil. Facebook waited exactly 5 years to notify my exposé is “offensive.” So I am under a mandatory 30-day ban. This is the third ban in just six months. That is, 3 months of the last six months my Facebook account has been offline because of censorship.

What does Facebook have against the Bible and those mentioning its verses?

What does Facebook have specifically against Leviticus 18:22, a famous verse in the Bible?

Leviticus 18:22 is famous not only among Christians, but also among Jews. In fact, this verse was firstly written and addressed to the Jewish people.

By the way, Facebook founder and CEO Mark Zuckerberg is a Jewish American. Does he approve what his company has done against the Jewish Scriptures? Is he aware of what his company is doing against the Jewish Scriptures?

Or does he think that Facebook is now bigger, greater and more important than the holy Jewish and Christian Scriptures?

I am a follower of the holy Jewish and Christian Scriptures. Why does Zuckerberg have removed my Bible post and blocked my account?

George Washington, the first U.S. president, said, “It is impossible to rightly govern a nation without God and the Bible.”

Would Zuckerberg and his company remove his Bible posts if he had a Facebook account?

Sadly, current America grants excessive freedom to homosexualists — a nonsense never imagined by the U.S. Founders, including the first U.S. president, George Washington, who loathed homosexuality and expelled homosexuals, but never killed them.

As recorded in “The Writings of George Washington” (March 10, 1778, 11:83-84, U.S. Government Printing Office, 1934), George Washington ordered: “At a General Court Marshall … Lieutt. Enslin of Colo. Malcom’s Regiment tried for attempting to commit sodomy, with John Monhort a soldier … and do sentence him to be dismiss’d the service with Infamy. His Excellency the Commander-in-Chief approves the sentence and with Abhorrence and Detestation of such Infamous Crimes orders Liett. Enslin to be drummed out of Camp tomorrow morning by all the Drummers and Fifers in the Army never to return.” (information from William Federer.)

Would Zuckerberg and his company block Washington’s Facebook account if he were living today?

Facebook not only removed my Bible post of Leviticus 18:22, but also a post with a picture of an “Islamic Barbie.” Here is the picture:

Medical or Christian criticism of homosexual behavior leads to censorship on Facebook. But pictures of the communist criminal Che Guevara, who murdered people, including gay men, remain unshakingly throughout Facebook’s social network, as if his filthy image did not deserve banishment for his crimes. Facebook punishes innocent Christians just for their views, but it spares communist criminals who did not spare human lives.

Christian criticism of Islamic behavior leads to censorship on Facebook. But praises to the pedophile and killer Muhammad and pictures of Islamic dictators who murder Christians remain unshakingly throughout Facebook’s social network, as if their filthy image did not deserve banishment for their crimes. Facebook punishes innocent Christians just for their views against Islam, but it spares Islamic criminals who do not spare human lives.

For treating Islamism and homosexuality as “sacred,” Facebook has blocked my profile for criticizing Islamic violence and homosexual filthy behavior. If only Muslims and homosexuals are left in the world, whom will Facebook privilege and treat as more sacred than the other?

It makes no sense for Facebook to censor a Christian like me because as far as Islam is concerned, Christians and Jews are supreme victims of this violent religion. In fact, some 100,000 Christians are martyred a year. Most of these murders are committed by Muslims. If Facebook were serious about human rights, it would ban Muslims from its platform, inclusive Saudi Arabia, until they banned all torture and murder of Christians. This is the simple and sheer truth.

If Facebook were equally serious about human rights of homosexuals, it would ban Muslim nations. Muslims, not Christians, have a high record of torture and murder of homosexuals. This is the simple and sheer truth.

In 1919, the communist theorist Antonio Gramsci said: “To tell the truth, to arrive together at the truth, is a communist and revolutionary act.”

In the left-wing Facebook universe, if you tell a “communist truth,” it is a welcome revolutionary act.

The communist truth includes the sample of Marxist commandments that say:

* Homosexual acts are normal.

* Islam is peace.

* Christianity is oppressive.

* Leviticus 18:22 deserves to be removed from the Facebook universe.

* Criticism and mockery of Christianity are allowed.

* Criticism and mockery of homosexuality and Islam are not allowed.

I face new Facebook bans if I violate Facebook’s Marxist commandments. I face new Facebook bans if I post more Bible verses against homosexual depravity or the Islamic culture of violence.

Paraphrasing and reversing words ascribed to George Orwell, but actually authored more or less by Gramsci, I say, “In a time of universal Marxist deceit and censorship, telling the truth is a Christian revolutionary act!”

Portuguese version of this article: Socorro! O Facebook está censurando versículos da Bíblia

Source: Last Days Watchman

Recommended Reading on Facebook:

Facebook excludes Israel and Includes Palestine

Why Does Facebook Harass and Censor Christians?

Why Does Facebook Grant Free Speech to Anti-Christian Radicals and Impose Censorship on Christians?

Facebook Acknowledges Its Own Censorship on Julio Severo. What Happens Now?

Facebook, Censorship, Profanity, Name-Calling and Foul Language

Other recommended Reading:

How to Help Julio Severo through the PayPal Account of the Jewish Institute for Global Awareness

Julio Severo seeks to move Christians to daily prayer with ‘Prophetic Prayers’

Recommended Reading on the U.S. Left against Julio Severo:

Patheos Lambasts Julio Severo for Mentioning Islamic Origin of Statue of Liberty

“Die Hard Democrat” Criticizes Julio Severo for Saying that Statue of Liberty Represents a Pagan-Islamic Curse on America

Right Wing Watch, of People for the American Way, Blacklists Julio Severo

Atheist Ed Brayton: Julio Severo is a Brazilian ‘wingnut’

Reading the Far Left: Left-Wing Wingnuts Call Conservatives What They Are

Reading the Far Left and Its Attack on Breitbart and BarbWire: Gay Perversion, Veiled and Overt

CNN Attacks Roy Moore Just Because He Shared My BarbWire Piece

I Do Not Appreciate Left-Wing Surveillance

Left-Wing Surveillance vs. Prayer Surveillance

“Die Hard Democrat” Criticizes Julio Severo for Not Blaming Hurricane Harvey on Global Warming

“Die Hard Democrat” Criticizes Julio Severo for Saying that Statue of Liberty Represents a Pagan-Islamic Curse on America

Patheos Lambasts Julio Severo for Mentioning Islamic Origin of Statue of Liberty

Protestant Church Founded by George Washington Rejects Him and Embraces Feminism and Liberation Theology

By Julio Severo

There was a day, not too long ago, when any American Protestant church would have been proud to claim George Washington, the first president of the United States and the founder of the American nation, as one of its founders and first members.

George Washington praying

That day has passed.

At Christ Church of Alexandria, Virginia, where the motto is “All are welcome, no exceptions,” its leaders decided its most famous member, George Washington, is no longer welcome.

Christ Church announced last October that it will remove a stone plaque that reads “In memory of George Washington” currently displayed on the left side of the altar.

Washington was one of the founding members of Christ Church, which is affiliated with the Episcopal Church USA. He purchased pew No. 5 when the church opened in 1773 and attended it for more than 20 years. Christ Church was as important to Washington that his family donated one of his Bibles to the church after his death.

Christ Church founded by George Washington

Christ Church said that the stone plaque on the side of the altar has become controversial because Washington owned slaves.

But feminism is not controversial for them. The Episcopal Church USA has embraced the “Mother Earth” theology, a supposedly “Christian” feminism.

Christ Church, founded by Washington, is today so feminist that it does not have a single male pastor listed on its website. All four ministers in this church are female. One of them, the Rev. Ann Gillespie, is a former Hollywood actress who recently included in her sermon a new version of the Apostle’s Creed.

It starts out, “I believe in God, our Mother Bear, source of all being,” and it refers to Mary, the mother of Jesus, as “the bad-ass womanist liberation theologian, Mary.”

This “creed” was concocted by a lesbian woman named Sarah Moon, who is a member of a United Methodist Church in Toledo, Ohio.

Moon declared in a September 2014 blog post she could no longer bear to recite the Apostle’s Creed, so she rewrote it and came up with her own “Feminist Apostle’s Creed.”

The Episcopal Church USA’s website indicates that liberation theology, social justice, Earth worship and inclusiveness take priority over the traditional Christian missions of trying to live a holy life and sharing the Gospel.

So Christ Church, founded by Washington, is today inclusive to liberation theology, feminism and the gay agenda, but it cannot tolerate Washington over slavery.

Slavery was a universal reality in Washington’s time, and even blacks in Africa, centuries before their first contacts with whites, enslaved other blacks. Even blacks in America enslaved blacks. Slavery was not begun by Washington and other Christians, and it was not ended by blacks or liberation theology adherents. It was ended by William Wilberforce and other Protestant whites.

If feminist ministers at Christ Church can see slavery in Washington, why cannot they see the modern slavery?

Do anti-Washington feminist ministers at Christ Church go naked? Almost no American today uses clothes not made by slave labor.

“‘Everyone loves a bargain but the true cost of that latest wardrobe addition is pitiful wages for Bangladesh’s legion of factory workers,’ writes Simon Parry” in his report “The true cost of your cheap clothes: slave wages for Bangladesh factory workers.” Cheap American clothes today are made by slave workers in Bangladesh and other poor nations.

Yet, you do not see feminists and black ativists in America complaining of the plight of those poor modern slaves. You do not see them going naked on boycott. To blame Washington is easier.

Do not anti-Washington feminist ministers at Christ Church use iPhone? Almost no American today goes without iPhone — whose making involves slavery from the beginning to the end.

An essential component of iPhone, Samsung and other smartphones and notebooks is coltan, which is extracted from mines in Congo by slave labor of children as young as 13. Congo in Africa has 80 percent of the world’s coltan, which is sent to factories in China — most notably, the Foxconn factories in Shenzhen. These factories, which produce components for iPhone, are “labor camp,” in which teenage students are forced to work more than double or even triple the overtime limit (36 hours a month under China’s labor laws). Regularly, workers attempt suicide. Even though there are anti-suicide nets to hinder workers from jumping from the roof of the buildings, some have succeeded.

You can see clothed feminists and black activists with their iPhones in their hands complaining of “Washington’s slavery,” but no angry that they are themselves actively supporting modern slavery.

Modern slaves have no time to study.

American history indicates that many white owners allowed their slaves to study. But feminists and blacks in the Protestant church founded by Washington do not care if he was kind or not to their slaves. They want to keep using their iPhones and clothes made by modern slaves, regardless if the slave labor is cruel or not.

Now George Washington is purged from his own church by feminists and liberation theology adherents, in a wave by black activists to remove monuments of white personalities, including Christopher Columbus.

For feminists, liberation theology adherents and black activists, Washington was racist just for being white.

What will come next? Will they remake the U.S. flag — yes, the Old Glory — and the Constitution because they were made by Anglo-Saxon whites and produce a flag and Constitution with the joint participation of blacks, Indians, Chinese, etc.?

Will they remake the U.S. flag and the Constitution because they were made by men and produce a flag and Constitution with the joint participation of homosexuals, etc.?

Will they remake the U.S. flag and the Constitution because they were made by mostly Protestant men and produce a flag and Constitution with the joint participation of Muslims, Hindus, sorcerers, etc.?

When the Protestant church founded by George Washington rejects him but embraces feminism and liberation theology, it is a dark sign of Satanism invading the Protestant foundation of America.

It is time to defend Washington and the Protestant principle of the Bible guiding individuals, families and nations to defeat feminism, liberation theology and the gay agenda. Washington said, “It is impossible to rightly govern a nation without God and the Bible.”

In this spirit, I am sure that while witches, occultists and Satanists were celebrating Halloween in October 31, 2017, Washington would be celebrating the landmark 500 years of the Protestant Reformation.

If even Donald Trump chose to celebrate Halloween, instead of the Protestant Reformation, what expect from Christ Church?

The Protestant church founded by Washington needs more than ever to obey the Bible.

America founded by Washington needs more than ever to obey the Bible.

If America denies and forgets her spiritual foundation, God will forget her.

With information from WorldNetDaily, DailyMail and Huffington Post.

Portuguese version of this article: Igreja protestante fundada por George Washington o rejeita e adota o feminismo e a teologia da libertação

Source: Last Days Watchman

Recommended Reading:

George Washington: “It is the duty of all nations to acknowledge God”

Roy Moore Attacked Because He Has the Same Anti-Homosexual Stance of George Washington

Left-Wing Groups Plan Nationwide “Deface Columbus Day”

Google’s Racial War Against Whites?

Trump, the Reformation and Halloween

Roy Moore Attacked by Homo-Fascists for Sharing My Article Endorsing Russia’s Anti-Gay Propaganda Laws

By Julio Severo

In the wake of the biased CNN report titled “Roy Moore’s Facebook page shared inflammatory memes, article praising Russia’s anti-gay laws,” which attacks Moore because of my BarbWire article, the homosexual websites Intomore and LGBTQNation quickly followed suit.

Referring to my article, LGBTQNation published its headline: “Senate candidate Roy Moore agrees with Russia’s antigay crackdown.”

In its piece titled “GOP Senate Candidate Shares Article Endorsing Russia’s Brutal Anti-Gay Propaganda Laws” (as if to ban homosexual propaganda to children were “brutal”), Intomore said:

One of America’s most homophobic politicians is in hot water yet again following reports that his Facebook page shared an article praising Russia’s anti-gay propaganda laws.

Roy Moore, the former Alabama Supreme Court justice who attempted to block same-sex marriage in his state, shared the offending link in 2015. Authored by BarbWire’s Julio Severo, the piece refers to Vladimir Putin’s oppressive regime as championing “a strong stance in defense of traditional family values.”

“It bans homosexual groups and individuals from giving children information about homosexuality,” Severo writes. “Violators face hefty fines and arrest.”

Intomore complains that homosexual “pride parades have been blocked across” Russia.

The Russian law kills homosexual propaganda, not homosexuals. In contrast, Saudi Arabia kills both homosexual propaganda and homosexuals.

Does Intomore see the difference? Apparently, it does not see. A simple Google search finds, in its results, that Intomore has condemned Russia many times (in 78 hits) and Saudi Arabia just 4 times (yes, incredibly just 4 hits).

If I understand Intomore’s logics, if you ban homosexual propaganda, you deserve many condemnations. But if you ban homosexual propaganda and apply capital punishment on homosexuals, you deserve just a few condemnations.

So, to avoid many condemnations from Intomore and other American homosexual websites, should Russia imitate Saudi Arabia, the closest Islamic partner of the United States, and add capital punishment to homosexuals?

Russia is the largest Orthodox Christian nation in the world. Saudi Arabia is the capital of Islam in the world.

Obviously Intomore and other homosexual websites are much more worried about Christianity than about Islam.

If homosexualists at Intomore were given an opportunity to choose between Saudi Arabia and Russia to live, would they would choose Saudi Arabia?

Perhaps their life philosophy is: It is better to die under Islam than living under Christianity!

Intomore also said about Moore:

The 70-year-old told C-SPAN2’s After Words in a 2005 interview that homosexuality should be illegal. Moore has called same-sex relations “abominable, detestable, unmentionable, and too disgusting and well known to require other definition or further details or description.”

Nothing new. Moore merely said what the Jewish and Christian Bibles have been saying for thousands of years!

Sadly, current America grants excessive freedom to homosexualists — a nonsense never imagined by the U.S. Founders, including the first U.S. president, George Washington, who loathed homosexuality and expelled homosexuals, but never killed them.

Intomore added:

Moore, who also shared a video questioning whether President Barack Obama is a Muslim, recently won the GOP nomination.

So is Intomore unhappy that Moore suggested Obama is a Muslim? For Intomore, is Islam better than Christianity? If so, to live in the United States or Russia is a bad choice and a “nightmare.” They should move to Saudi Arabia.

Next, Intomore said about me:

But at least one person is happy about Moore’s endorsement of Russian homophobia: the author of the BarbWire piece himself.

Responding to the CNN report which broke the story, Severo writes that it’s a “privilege” to have his article shared by the former jurist, who was removed from his position after being found guilty of numerous ethics violations. Calling the cable station the “Communist News Network,” the author refers to CNN as “one of most rabid left-wing, anti-conservative channels in the United States.”

The “numerous ethics violations” are mainly that Moore refused a federal judge’s order to remove a Ten Commandments monument from the state courthouse lobby and that he opposed gay “marriage,” resulting in his permanent suspension. I would also love to be condemned for such “ethics violations”!

As an evangelical Christian, Moore acted correctly by sharing my article endorsing Russia’s anti-gay propaganda laws.

Christians do not approve the brutal Islamic treatment of homosexuals in Saudi Arabia and other Muslim nations. This treatment results in the torture and death of homosexuals.

But Christians everywhere approve righteousness everywhere. If Russia has a law banning homosexual propaganda to protect children and teenagers from the harmful effects of homosexual indoctrination, this is righteousness.

If Russia, the largest Orthodox Christian nation in the world, approves such righteousness, Christians everywhere praise it.

If the United States, the largest Protestant nation in the world, approves such righteousness, Christians everywhere praise it.

I am a Brazilian, but I praise George Washington for his correct attitude of loathing homosexuality and expelling homosexuals. Would he expel homosexualists from the U.S. government today? You bet! I am a fan of Washington. Yet, Intomore would prefer to express many condemnations of Christian Washington and a few condemnations of the Islamic Saudis.

For homo-fascists, it is “brutal” to ban homosexual propaganda to children. Yet, whatever they think, they are not entitled to our children. In fact, they have no rights whatsoever over children.

It is actually brutal not to protect children and teenagers from homosexual propaganda.

I am pretty sure that if Washington were risen today and given an opportunity to offer his views on laws banning homosexual propaganda, he would side with children’s safety.

Washington is not here. But America has thousands of Christians like Washington. Moore is one of them.

To protect children from predatory homosexuality and its propaganda is more important than protecting predatory homosexual propaganda to children.

Roy Moore should be praised for understanding this difference and siding with Washington.

America needs heroes like Washington. Moore is one of them. If America has wicked individuals, including in her State Department and her embassies, who praise sodomy around the world, why cannot America have a hero praising efforts around the world, including in Russia, to protect children from the homosexual propaganda?

Portuguese version of this article: Roy Moore atacado por homo-fascistas por compartilhar meu artigo de apoio às leis contra propaganda homossexual na Rússia

Source: Last Days Watchman

Recommended Reading on Roy Moore:

CNN Attacks Roy Moore Just Because He Shared My BarbWire Piece

Conservative Judge Roy Moore wins in Republican Senate primary in Alabama despite Trump support for rival

Conservative Christians Endorse Roy Moore for U.S. Senate

Right Wing Watch Defames Conservative Christian Judge Roy Moore and His Supporters

Gay “Marriage”: A Hero in Alabama

Gay “Marriage”: Alabama Fights Against Judicial Activism from the U.S. Supreme Court

Recommended Reading on other Left-Wingers against Julio Severo:

“Die Hard Democrat” Criticizes Julio Severo for Not Blaming Hurricane Harvey on Global Warming

Atheist Ed Brayton: Julio Severo is a Brazilian ‘wingnut’

Facebook Acknowledges Its Own Censorship on Julio Severo. What Happens Now?

Right Wing Watch, of People for the American Way, against Julio Severo

Left-Wing Surveillance vs. Prayer Surveillance

Reading the Far Left: Left-Wing Wingnuts Call Conservatives What They Are

Reading the Far Left and Its Attack on Breitbart and BarbWire: Gay Perversion, Veiled and Overt