Biden Administration Sent 350 Tons of Military Equipment to Ukraine

By Julio Severo

The far-left-wing Biden administration is ramping up military aid to Ukraine, with a US cargo ship delivering 350 tons of military equipment to Ukraine’s Odessa port.

Ocean Glory

The cargo ship Ocean Glory under the American flag specializes in military transportation. Built in 2015, length 171 meters, width 25 meters, deadweight about 20 thousand tons, it entered the port of Odessa on 24 March 2021.

A month after Biden taking office, the White House issued an official communique decrying “Russia’s illegal invasions of Ukraine.”

“The United States continues to stand with Ukraine and its allies and partners today, as it has from the beginning of this conflict. On this somber anniversary, we reaffirm a simple truth: Crimea is Ukraine,” the Biden administration said on Feb.26.

“The United States does not and will never recognize Russia’s purported annexation of the peninsula, and we will stand with Ukraine against Russia’s aggressive acts.”

The conflict between Ukraine and Russia was created by George Soros and U.S. left-wing President Barack Hussein Obama, who ousted a pro-Russia administration in Ukraine to install an anti-Russia administration. Eventually, Democrats were benefited by the Ukrainian revolution.

According to WND (WorldNetDaily), Ukrainian natural gas firm Burisma hired Hunter Biden while his father was vice president for him to help them to shut down investigations against the company’s owner.

WND also reported that the FBI got emails from Hunter Biden showing the former vice president’s son strategized to cash in on his father’s visit to Ukraine.

So the interests of Democrats (or U.S. socialists) seem to go in three directions:

* To make Democrats participants in the Ukrainian corruption.

* To make the U.S. military industrial complex stronger.

* To make Ukraine a proxy against Russia.

The Ukrainian case is a showcase of neocon ambitions. While Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton and George Soros were calling the Ukrainian revolution a people’s revolution, in a WND report Savage said,

“The situation in Ukraine has been painted as a conflict between Vladimir Putin’s Russia, the so-called bad guys, and Ukrainian rebels, the so-called good guys who seek to oust Russia from a position of influence in Ukraine and install a new government that will be responsive to the Ukrainian people. Don’t believe a word of it. The Ukrainian nationalists are fascists. Washington’s original purpose for staging a coup in Ukraine was to move Ukraine away from Russia and bring Ukraine into the European Union. In other words, the neocons and the bought-and-paid-for ‘moderates’ in the Obama administration wanted to wrest control of Ukraine from Putin’s hands and gain economic and energy control over the country. As Dr. Stephen F. Cohen has pointed out, Western nations, with the U.S. leading the way, have been provoking Putin for decades. We’ve expanded NATO to include former Soviet states – Ukraine looks like the next target – and we’ve attacked allies of Russia, including Libya and Iraq. The U.S. – along with other Western nations – through our incursions into the politics, economics and national security of Russia and several of its allies, has effectively caused the situation that is now unfolding in Ukraine. Cohen is right.”

Savage pointed that Obama and his neocons, not conservatives, created a revolution in Ukraine to draw it away from Russia and put it, eventually, into NATO’s orbit.

With information from ZeroEdge.

Portuguese version of this article: Governo Biden enviou 350 toneladas de equipamentos militares para a Ucrânia

Source: Last Days Watchman

Recommended Reading:

An Empire Launched by U.S. Socialists

What Is Neoconservatism? Who are the Neocons?

Trump: “The United States cannot continue to be the policeman of the world”

The Transcendent Power of Neoconservatism in the U.S. Media and among Left-Wingers and Right-Wingers

Conservative Babylon in “Persecuted”: Hybrid Televangelist Framed by Pagan Neocon, and the Free Speech or Patriotic or Equality “Gospel” Replacing the Gospel of Jesus Christ

Why the American Left Hates Russia

Why Throw U.S. Evangelicals into the Soros-Provoked Conflict in Ukraine?

Left-Wing Billionaire George Soros and His Plan of Global Chaos

Trump Has Broken His Promise of Defunding the American Abortion Holocaust

By Julio Severo

With sweat and tears, conservative Americans gave the Republicans: a majority in the House, a majority in the Senate and the ultimate victory and crown: the White House. They did it because they believed their conservative promises.

If some years ago Republicans could not defund Planned Parenthood (the largest network of abortion and family planning clinics in the U.S.) because socialist Democrats had a majority in the House, in the Senate and had the White House, now the upper hand belongs to Republicans. If formerly Democrats could fund abortion, now Republicans can defund it… if they want.

Yet, it seems that they do not want, even though they have been elected by their conservative constituents just for standing against abortion.

Last week, the GOP-controlled Congress passed an Omnibus Spending Bill (Omnibus Bill) valued at $1.3 trillion in order to keep the U.S. government from shutting down.

Yet, was it worthwhile not to shut it down?

Actually, Trump’s signature did much more than just hindering the U.S. government from shutting down. It hindered the abortion industry from shutting down too.

The Omnibus Bill preserves Medicaid “reimbursements” and Title X funding for “family planning.” This is to say, it maintains America’s $500 million annual contribution to Planned Parenthood, America’s largest abortion mill.

Basically, when Trump approved the Omnibus Bill, he applied capital punishment on all his promises of defunding abortion.

Does a government funding abortion deserve not to shut down?

Trump’s approval of the Omnibus Bill is especially tragic because last January he delivered a historic pro-life speech.

The big victors have been pro-abortion activists.

Abortion was not the only tragedy in the bill Trump signed.

The Omnibus Bill funds abortions and does not fund the building a Border Wall, which is essential for the U.S. security.

It funds war on babies on American soil and wars on foreign soil, by increasing military expenses. Even though the main responsibility of a military force is to guard the borders of its own nation, U.S. expenses support the U.S. Global Police, including 800 U.S. military bases around the world. It is hard to imagine a more ridiculous and hypocritical case than a nation that can guard its military ambitions around the world but is unable to guard its own backyard!

The big victors have been neocons.

Conservative columnist and author Ann Coulter late Tuesday accused President Trump of being an "ignoramus" who is "not giving us what he promised" during a speech at Columbia University.

“I knew he was a shallow, lazy ignoramus, and I didn’t care,” Coulter told the audience, which was largely comprised of College Republicans.

“It kind of breaks my heart,” she added. “He’s not giving us what he promised at every single campaign stop.”

Still, Coulter contended that Trump’s campaign was vastly preferable to those of his competitors, whom she likened to escaped mental patients.

“We had 16 lunatics being chased by men with nets running for president—and Trump,” Coulter explained. “So of course I had to be pedal-to-the-metal for Donald Trump. I’d been waiting 30 years for someone to say all these things,” probably referring to his promise to build a wall along the U.S.-Mexico border and also his promise to stop neocons’ military meddling in other nations.

In 2016, Coulter published the e-book “In Trump We Trust: E Pluribus Awesome!” to challenge America to vote in Trump.

The book praises Trump’s promises of

1. Building a Wall. Coulter said, “Trump announced he was running for president in a speech talking about Mexican rapists, pledging to deport illegal aliens and build a wall.” After over one year in office, Trump has not built yet even an inch of the wall.

2. Not meddling in Syria. Coulter said, “Trump was the only Republican—other than Rand Paul—who did not propose starting a slew of new wars in the Middle East.” Yet, last year she had to criticize him for breaking his promise on Syria.

3. Not arming Ukraine against Russia. In her book Coulter pointed that all candidates, except for Trump, had promised to arm Ukraine. She remarked, “How many Americans wake up every night in a cold sweat in anguish about Ukraine? Even people afraid of global warming aren’t worried about that. Ukraine was part of Russia for most of its history. It would be as if Putin sent fighter jets to force America to give Texas back to Mexico. Most Americans not only don’t care if Putin takes Crimea and the Ukraine.” Yet, Trump broke his promise.

4. Getting along with Putin. Coulter added, “Most Republicans seek to prove their conservative bona fides by having an itchy trigger finger—particularly toward Russia. These days, there’s no one to oppose them. The American left used to be totally fine with the Soviet Union—the gulags, the invading Eastern Europe, the show trials. Until the anti-gay stuff. Now the Russkies are walking on the fighting side of liberals!” Even Trump has embarked the anti-Putin train.

Coulter is right. Trump is not giving America what he promised at every single campaign stop — at least, not on foreign policy, where Trump used to disgust neocons, but now he pleases them on every at every single point.

The vital mission of the military is to protect its own backyard. The U.S. military is failing horribly in this mission, because they are too busy in neocons’ military adventures in other nations.

Before Trump approving the Omnibus Bill, pro-life leaders pleaded with him to veto it.

“Mr. President, Planned Parenthood is the largest abortion business in the U.S., making them one of the largest abusers of human beings in the world,” said Troy Newman, President of Operation Rescue and one of the founding members of the Center for Medical Progress. “It is currently under investigation by your Department of Justice for engaging in the illegal sale of aborted baby remains for profit, as revealed in a series of authenticated undercover videos that shook the nation in 2015.”

“During your 2016 Presidential Campaign, you promised to defund Planned Parenthood,” he reminded Trump. “I urge you now to keep your promise and veto the Omnibus bill until it no longer provides any of our tax money to Planned Parenthood.”

Yet, Trump broke his promise. He did not veto the Omnibus Bill.

If a foreign force were slaughtering over 500,000 innocent American babies a year, the U.S. military would work to defeat the perpetrator. Such high numbers of innocent lives are actually being destroyed on American soil, and the perpetrator is not China and not even America’s favorite bogeyman: Russia. The perpetrators are abortion mills, especially Planned Parenthood. Abortion is today the leading cause of murder in the United States.

The U.S. military is doing nothing to destroy this enemy.

President Trump, who for so many times has promised to defund Planned Parenthood and its abortion holocaust, signed the Omnibus Bill. In the past, the U.S. Abortion Holocaust had the assistance of socialist Democrats to keep killing. Now the U.S. Abortion Holocaust needed Trump’s assistance, and it received.

No government deserves to continue operating by delivering its innocent babies on the medical altar of slaughter.

No government deserves to continue operating by abandoning the protection of its borders to invest in the military meddling of other nations’ borders, just to satisfy neocons.

It just sad that conservatives vote for politicians to save America from abortion, and then politicians need to keep funding abortion to save the government from shutting down.

What is the point for conservative constituents to elect “conservative” politicians if they eventually approve funding for abortion?

“I say to Congress, I will never sign another bill like this again,” Trump said earlier this month. An insightful cartoon portrays Trump about to jump from a plank from a skyscraper and promising to his advisers “Ok, but I’m never doing this again.” There will no second chance.

For the sake of innocent babies condemned to medical and government slaughter, could American conservatives just shut down the U.S. government? Or will they wait for God to do it?

With the information from “Chronicles, a Magazine of American Culture,” “In Trump We Trust,” The Hill and LifeSiteNews.

Portuguese version of this article: Trump quebrou sua promessa de suspender o financiamento do holocausto do aborto nos EUA

Source: Last Days Watchman

Recommended Reading:

Leading Causes of Death in the United States, and Gun Homicides Are Not One of Them

Holocaust, Abortion and Sodomy

Trump Delivers Historic Pro-Life Speech But Goofs As He Congratulates Homosexual Republicans

What Is Neoconservatism? Who are the Neocons?

Constituent sues GOP, accusing the party of fraud

Proved: Russian Trolls Did in the U.S. Presidential Election… What the U.S. Does in the Elections of Other Nations

By Julio Severo

According to the indictment by Special Counsel Robert Mueller, Russia meddled in the 2016 U.S. presidential election: through internet trolls!

There is much deliberate confusion regarding this meddling. But one thing is definitely clear: The American and global Left was solidly behind their candidate Hillary Clinton. For them, anyone or any nation hindering Clinton’s victory committed an “unpardonable” sin. And what did American investigation show? That Russian trolls acted definitely against Clinton, who lost the election.

Patrick J. Buchanan, a former adviser to President Ronald Reagan and former Republican presidential candidate, said, “One imaginative Russian troll urged Trumpsters to dress up a female volunteer in an orange prison jump suit, put her in a cage on a flatbed truck, then append the slogan, ‘Lock Her Up!’”

Russians committed the “unpardonable” sin, and now Democrats and Republicans, U.S. left-wingers and right-wingers want to make Russia pay for allegedly helping Donald Trump win, as if the heavy sanctions Obama imposed — and not discontinued by Trump — on Russia were not enough.

Often, I think that U.S. left-wingers and right-wingers use to attack Russia as a scarecrow to distract the American public and the world. While both sides keep us distracted, they can advance any agenda they share. And there is a shared agenda: the neocon ideology.

While Mueller’s indictments confirm that Russian trolls meddled in the U.S. election, what explains the left-wing and right-wing hysteria against Russia?

In this point, I agree with Rev. Chuck Baldwin, who said “The War Party Marches On.” This party is comprised by both the Democratic Party and the Republican Party. The Neocon Party, which is above all parties in the U.S., needs a scarecrow.

Socialists accuse Russia, because their candidate lost. But conservatives, especially neoconservatives (neocons), are also accusing Russia.

If the alleged Russian meddling through trolls is an act supreme hostility, why during his 2016 campaign, did candidate Trump say, “Russia, if you’re listening, I hope you’re able to find the 30,000 emails that are missing”? He was referring to emails on Clinton’s private server that she said she deleted, according to an Associated Pres report.

Trump made such daring public request because it was clear, for him, that Russia was against Clinton.

Now he is showing dissatisfaction with the alleged Russian meddling in the U.S. elections, but he seems to ignore the U.S. meddling in the elections of other nations. John Perkins, in his book “Confessions of an Economic Hit Man,” has said that U.S. intelligence agencies have rigged elections in other nations for decades.

According to Joseph Farah, WND (WorldNetDaily) chief, even Israel did not escape from U.S. meddling in Israeli elections. Farah said, “Barack Obama used U.S. taxpayer money openly to influence the election of its best ally in the Middle East, Israel.” He added, “The late Sen. Ted Kennedy actually asked for the Soviet Union’s help in defeating Ronald Reagan’s re-election effort in 1988. Where were the scowls of outrage back then?”

If Democrats could ask Soviet Union to help defeat a Republican candidate, why cannot a Republican candidate ask a conservative Russia to help defeat a Democrat candidate? It was what Trump did in 2016.

In his WND article titled “Is that Russia troll farm an act of war?” Patrick J. Buchanan said:

As for Russian trolling in our election, do we really have clean hands when it comes to meddling in elections and the internal politics of regimes we dislike?

Sen. John McCain and Victoria Nuland of State egged on the Maidan Square crowds in Kiev that overthrew the elected government of Ukraine. When the democratically elected regime of Mohamed Morsi was overthrown, the U.S. readily accepted the coup as a victory for our side and continued aid to Egypt as tens of thousands of Muslim Brotherhood members were imprisoned.

Are the CIA and National Endowment for Democracy under orders not to try to influence the outcome of elections in nations in whose ruling regimes we believe we have a stake?

“Have we ever tried to meddle in other countries’ elections?” Laura Ingraham asked former CIA Director James Woolsey this weekend.

With a grin, Woolsey replied, “Oh, probably.”

“We don’t do that anymore, though?” Ingraham interrupted. “We don’t mess around in other people’s elections, Jim?”

“Well,” Woolsey said with a smile. “Only for a very good cause.”

Indeed, what is the National Endowment for Democracy all about, if not aiding the pro-American side in foreign nations and their elections?

Did America have no active role in the “color-coded revolutions” that have changed regimes from Serbia to Ukraine to Georgia?

When Republicans discuss Iran on Capitol Hill, the phrase “regime change” is frequently heard… in 2009, Republicans denounced President Obama for not intervening more energetically to alter the outcome [in Iran].

When China, Russia and Egypt expel NGOs, are their suspicions that some have been seeded with U.S. agents merely marks of paranoia?

The U.S. role in the overthrow of Premier Mossadegh in Iran in 1953, and of Jacobo Arbenz in Guatemala in 1954, and of President Ngo Dinh Diem in Saigon in 1963 are established facts.

So when the U.S. does exactly what it condemns in other nations, it is correct and democratic. But no nation is entitled to copy U.S. actions. Journalist Glenn Greenwald said about “the most vivid distillations of American Exceptionalism” in his Twitter account: “the US has the full, unfettered right to do exactly what we demand other nations don’t do because — unlike them — we’re Good, so it’s done for Good ends, not Bad ones.”

In my Twitter account, I answered him: “Sad, but true. Only evangelical Christians, who made a difference in the birth of America, can also make a difference today against neocons’ interference and discrepancy in the US foreign policy.”

The U.S. government, under left-wing and right-wing presidents, makes a big fuss over minimal meddling in the U.S. election (even internet trolls are a supreme crime against the U.S., according to neocons), but both sides heavily meddle, with covert CIA operations through NGOs and other ways, in the elections of other nations.

As Jesus said,

“And as you wish that others would do to you, do so to them.” (Luke 6:31 ESV)

Instead making fuss over Russian trolls and using Russia as a scarecrow for the sake of neocon policies, America under Trump should prosecute Obama for creating ISIS, which committed genocide of Christians in Syria and Iraq. Trump himself said in 2016 that Obama created ISIS. So Obama and Hillary Clinton were accomplices of genocide of Christians. By the U.S. law, which condemns accomplices of mass murders, would not both deserve capital punishment for aiding and abetting the genocide of Christian through ISIS?

America under Trump should prosecute Obama and Clinton for provoking Russia since Putin passed in 2013 a law banning homosexual propaganda to children and teens.

America under Trump should prosecute Obama and Clinton for overthrowing the Ukrainian government in 2014 and imposing sanctions on Russia in the aftermath of U.S. interference in Ukraine.

America under Trump should prosecute Obama and Clinton for using the U.S. government to promote Islam, abortion and the homosexual agenda around the world.

The U.S. should stop using Russia as a scarecrow and deal with Obama’s and Clinton’s crimes.

Trump should discontinue Obama’s left-wing legacy of sanctions and other unconservative actions against a more conservative Russia.

Russia could retaliate Obama’s and Hillary Clinton’s mischiefs through nuclear attack. Who can blame them for using internet trolls to vent their complaints against Clinton?

Portuguese version of this article: Provado: Trolls russos fizeram na eleição presidencial americana… o que os EUA fazem nas eleições de outros países

Source: Last Days Watchman

Recommended Reading:

Why the American Left Hates Russia

US Ambassador Says She Will Keep Beating Up on Russia

What Is Neoconservatism? Who are the Neocons?

Broken Promise: Trump to Send Lethal Weapons to Ukraine in Fight against Russia

By Julio Severo

The Trump administration has approved a plan to provide lethal weapons to Ukraine, a move that deepens America’s involvement in the military conflict and may further strain relations with Russia, according to an Associated Press report of December 23, 2017. The Russian government did not respond in a positive tone.

John McCain and neo-Nazi leader in Ukraine

Even though it is very important, Trump’s decision comes as people are with their mind occupied with Christmas season and New Year. It is a very unpleasant surprise which no one is paying attention to because of distractive Christmas.

Why does Trump want to arm Ukraine against Russia?

The Obama administration, with the assistance of neocons, ignited the conflict in Ukraine, and Trump’s promise in his 2016 campaign was not to support Ukraine, but Russia, especially considering that, technically, Russia is well-equipped to respond to Ukrainian escalation with a stronger answer.

While Trump had praised Russia in 2016 and his advisers were supporting pro-Russian forces in Ukraine, neocons have openly praised the Ukrainian revolution as the best democratic example against dictatorship. The Ukrainian revolution was the biggest Soros revolution, massively funded by him.

John McCain and other neocons want Ukraine in NATO and are willing to go to war over it. In contrast, Trump had shown no willingness to follow neocon passions for war in Ukraine against Russia.

On September 2016, Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko invited Trump for a meeting, but, according to DailyMail, “the Ukrainian government says the Republican candidate blew them off.”

Yet, Hillary Clinton met Poroshenko and promised him that she would stand with Ukraine against “Russian aggression.”

While neocons want Ukraine in NATO’s orbit and they are using the Ukrainian situation to strengthen NATO, Trump had again been in conflict with their interests. Yet, now as president Trump has abandoned his anti-neocon promises and followed Hillary’s bad example.

Sending lethal weapons to Ukraine was Hillary’s original proposal. McCain and other neocons also want to arm Ukraine. In fact, Kurt Volker, the U.S. special representative for Ukraine negotiations, is a “former staffer of Sen. McCain… and executive director of the neocon McCain Institute.” Volker is the architect of the new arms package from Trump to Ukraine.

McCain is one of the most rabid neocons in the U.S. Congress.

Volker envisions a deepening U.S. involvement in a Ukrainian civil war that was initiated by Obama, Soros and neocons.

Sending lethal weapons to Ukraine creates the troubling possibility that American arms could kill Russian soldiers, a situation that could thrust the two nuclear-armed nations closer to direct confrontation.

It is an unnecessary and stupid military escalation, under Trump, of a conflict initiated by Obama, McCain and neocons. Besides, Ukraine has nothing to do with a very far-away America. What if Russia got involved in Mexico and armed Mexicans against the U.S.? Would America accept it in a positive tone?

Catholic conservative Patrick J. Buchanan has asked an important question: Has Trump capitulated to the neocons? This capitulation seems to have become easier after the fall of his anti-neocon advisers hinders. Their fall hindered Trump from pursuing focus of partnership with Russia against Islamic terror.

In the last years, Europe has been invaded by Islamic barbaric hordes, and Obama and NATO did nothing, militarily or otherwise, to protect Europe from invasion. The most urgent need for America is to help Europe against Islamic hordes. Yet, NATO, which was created by America to protect Europe, has done absolutely nothing to protect Europe against Islamic hordes. America under Obama did nothing. And America under Trump has done nothing.

In 2016, Trump promised an alliance with Russia against Islamic terror, but as president his administration has surpassed all past Democratic and Republican administration in supporting and arming Saudi Arabia, the top sponsor of Islamic terrorism around the world.

In his first international trip, Trump gave all preference to the Saudis, by visiting first Saudi Arabia, and leaving Israel in second place.

Trump made a US$ 110 billion sale of military equipment to Saudi Arabia — which the White House said that it was the “largest single arms deal in U.S. history.”

What has Trump got in return? When the United Nations condemned Trump for his recognition of Jerusalem as Israel’s capital, Saudi Arabia, which is a neighbor of Israel and a close U.S. ally, voted against Trump.

And, it should never be forgotten, most Islamic terrorists behind 9/11 were Saudi. Even so, the U.S., under Bush, Obama and Trump, has flattered and armed the Saudis.

In contrast, the U.S., under Bush, Obama and Trump, has incessantly provoked Russia, which is much more conservative today. It is a provocation exclusively to please neocons.

As a conservative evangelical (conservative evangelicals were Trump’s main voting base), I support Trump in his pro-Israel decisions and in his pro-family and pro-life stances. But I cannot support him for breaking his 2016 promises on Russia and Ukraine. I cannot support him for amplifying the constant neocon aggression against Russia. I am loyal to Trump’s 2016 anti-neocon model.

Portuguese version of this article: Promessa quebrada: Trump vai enviar armas letais para a Ucrânia em luta contra a Rússia

Source: Last Days Watchman

Recommended Reading:

Coincidence or Warning? USS John S. McCain Damaged in a Collision on the Same Day as the Solar Eclipse

Why Throw U.S. Evangelicals into the Soros-Provoked Conflict in Ukraine?

What Is Neoconservatism? Who are the Neocons?

Fall of anti-neocon advisers hinders Trump from pursuing his promised focus of partnership with Russia against Islamic terror; new neocon advisers urge the old, traditional focus against Russia

Left-Wing Billionaire George Soros and His Plan of Global Chaos

An Open Letter to President Donald Trump