Showing posts with label global warming. Show all posts
Showing posts with label global warming. Show all posts

Friday, November 08, 2019

Ideological Scam: Scientists Use “Climate Change” to Call for Population Control


Ideological Scam: Scientists Use “Climate Change” to Call for Population Control

To solve a problem that doesn’t exist, scientists want to aggravate a problem that already exists

By Julio Severo
Thousands of scientists around the world have signed a letter declaring that without population control “untold human suffering” will happen.
The “World Scientists’ Warning of a Climate Emergency” was published in the journal BioScience on November 5, 2019, and was signed by 11,258 scientists from 153 countries.
In the statement, the signatories listed both economic growth and a global population increase as “among the most important drivers of increases in CO2 emissions from fossil fuel combustion.”
The statement was published after the Trump administration formally declared that the U.S. was withdrawing from the Paris Climate Accord, an international agreement set to go into effect in 2020 under which many UN member countries pledged to reduce their carbon emissions.
The Vatican under Pope Francis has supported the Paris agreement, and such support is in line with statements by John Paul II and Pope Benedict XVI condemning global warming, an ideological scam promoted by left-wingers. Francis even had with Obama, in 2015, an alliance against global warming. But, different from left-wing scammers, the popes have not embraced population control.
In their statement, the scientists, known as Alliance of World Scientists, said, “The world population must be stabilized.”
Yet, isn’t the U.S. population “stabilized” enough? Isn’t the European population “stabilized” enough? The reality is that the U.S. and European populations are so “stabilized” that Europe and the U.S. are in need to receive millions of immigrants, and who is taking advantage are Islamic invaders, who are taking the place of European and American babies who were never been allowed to be born because of birth control.
According to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control (CDC), the birth rate in the United States hit an all-time low in 2018 with the total fertility rate at 1.7 — well below the replacement rate of 2.1. According to demographic prospects in the 2019 Revision of World Population Prospects, for the years 2015-2020, Western Europe was estimated at 1.68 live births per woman. Latin America and the Caribbean fell just under replacement level at 2.05 live births per woman.
Successful population control policies, the report noted, “make family-planning services available to all people, remove barriers to their access and achieve full gender equity, including primary and secondary education as a global norm for all, especially girls and young women.”
Trump has not abandoned the Paris Climate Accord because of “family planning,” also known as birth control. He left it because it says that excessive consumerism and excessive production endanger the ecological system. No nation on the earth produces more and consumes more than the United States does.
The spell has turned against the sorcerer. The most destructive population-control document was NSSM 200, produced not by left-wingers or Democrats. It was produced by a Republican, right-wing administration in the U.S. in 1974. It advocates two main strategies to reduce the world population: Integration of family planning in the medical services and promotion of extensive education for girls and women, with the real goal not to help them, but to keep them away from marriage.
While in the 1970s the Soviet Union was the leading promoter of communism, the U.S. was, in the shadows, the leading promoter of population control.
NSSM 200 was drafted by the CIA, USAID and the State Department and their secret objective was to reduce the world population for the U.S. interests. Some large nations, including Brazil, were targeted for the population control measures of CIA to hinder their own population from using their own natural resources, which would be saved for the U.S.
So NSSM 200 promotes population control to protect the U.S. excessive consumerism and excessive production.
While the United Nations, which was founded by the U.S., promotes population control to reduce excessive consumerism and excessive production, NSSM 200 promotes population control exactly to protect U.S. excessive consumerism and excessive production.
No one promotes evil without being harmed by it. The U.S. is being harmed by NSSM 200, which greatly harmed other nations, including Brazil, by indoctrinating officials and populations to use birth control without informing that the real purpose was to save their natural resources for the U.S. interests, including U.S. excessive consumerism and excessive production.
The U.S. is being harmed by NSSM 200, which greatly harmed other nations, including Brazil, by indoctrinating officials and populations that excessive education for girls and young women was to empower them without informing that the real purpose was to keep them away from marriage, not for their real well-being, but for the U.S. interests, including U.S. excessive consumerism and excessive production.
Fulfilling the NSSM 200’s goals, today Brazil has a population fully engaged in birth control and girls and young women who do not dream about marrying and having children, but about studying excessively to become some sort of professionals. Marriage is a far-away option in these educational and professional plans, while sexual activity and birth control are always near.
In the 1970s, famine was used as an excuse for population control, and fear-mongering authors as Paul Ehrlich used famine as an example of how population without birth control measures produced famine. But today it is known that the large famines that ravaged especially Africa in the 1970s and 1980s were produced by communism.
Widespread famines in Africa were used in the population-control scam to hide the consequences of communism.
Now the ideological scam is global warming or climate change. This scam is the real problem, because the population in the West is below the replacement rate and there will be serious economic consequences in the next decades as a increasingly lesser number of babies are born in Europe and the U.S. To talk about a population problem in the West is non-sense. The West needs desperately population growth. The West desperately needs more and more babies.
Even though Trump has abandoned the Paris Climate Accord, it is unlikely that he has abandoned population control scams. His administration heavily funds birth control for the U.S. population. His administration is pushing for the normalization of homosexuality around the world. Homosexuality is a powerful way to reduce the world population.
Population growth with traditional Christian and work ethics, as the example of the U.S. shows, produces creativity, development and progress. Population growth with no Christian ethics, as the example of Islamic and communist nations show, produces no creativity, development and progress.
Population growth with the Protestant work ethic has produced unparallel progress and development for the U.S. Population growth without such ethic produces unrest and violence, and Islamic nations are rife with unrest, violence and sordid tyrannies.
Population controllers should preach and implement population control to Islamic nations, where it is the most necessary. To preach and implement population control to the West, where its population is dying, is demographic euthanasia.
The West has made excessive population control in itself by embracing the contraceptive mindset, which includes abortion. It is not necessary to be a scientist to know the West is in a serious demographic crisis, with Muslim multitudes ready to take over.
It is time to reject the ideological scams of scientists. It is time to reject the contraceptive mindset, including homosexuality, which is an effective population control behavior.
Trump should be commended for leaving the Paris Climate Accord. But he needs our prayers to understand that birth control and the homosexual agenda are essential tools of the population control agenda behind the climate emergency scam.
With information from DailyMail, Catholic News Agency and the New American.
Recommended Reading:

Tuesday, October 08, 2019

Vladimir Putin dismisses Greta Thunberg as a “poorly informed teenager” and in answer she mocks him


Vladimir Putin dismisses Greta Thunberg as a “poorly informed teenager” and in answer she mocks him

By Julio Severo
Global warming activist Greta Thunberg has mocked Vladimir Putin after the Russian President referred to her as a “poorly informed teenager” who was being “used by adults” on October 2, 2019.
The 16-year-old left-wing activist has taken the words out of Putin’s mouth and made them her Twitter biography, calling herself, “A kind but poorly informed teenager.”
The Russian president said the Swedish girl should “Go and explain to developing countries why they should continue living in poverty and not be like Sweden.”
Putin said young people who paid attention to environmental issues should be supported, adding: “But when someone is using children and teenagers in personal interests, it only deserves to be condemned. I’m sure that Greta is a kind and very sincere girl. But adults must do everything not to bring teenagers and children into some extreme situations.”
Putin told he did not share the excitement about the Swede’s United Nations speech last month.
The Swedish girl electrified left-wingers at the UN summit in New York when she denounced world leaders for failing, in her vision, to tackle climate change. But no conservative took her seriously.
Putin told it was deplorable that Thunberg was being used by some groups to achieve their own goals. He said: “I may disappoint you but I don’t share the common excitement about the speech by Greta Thunberg. No one has explained to Greta that the modern world is complex and different and… people in Africa or in many Asian countries want to live at the same wealth level as in Sweden.”
U.S. President Donald Trump also did not take Greta seriously.
With information from DailyMail.
Recommended Reading:

Wednesday, September 06, 2017

“Die Hard Democrat” Criticizes Julio Severo for Not Blaming Hurricane Harvey on Global Warming


“Die Hard Democrat” Criticizes Julio Severo for Not Blaming Hurricane Harvey on Global Warming

By Julio Severo
Writing in a website called “Die Hard Democrat,” left-wing Jeremy Berg is annoyed because in my article “Judgment on Houston and Warning to America?” I did not blame Hurricane Harvey on global warming.
In his article titled “Right-Winger Has Odd Explanation For Why Harvey Happened,” Berg said,
“Trump-supporting members of the far right cannot see how climate change could have played a role in Hurricane Harvey. Instead, they have been ascribing all manner of divine warnings and messages to the storm. One right-wing writer just came up with a particularly far-fetched and specific reason for why he feels God made Harvey happen.”
Then he cites my name and shows my picture.
As far as Trump is committed to his campaign speech against neocons, against abortion and does no compromise on the homosexual agenda, I can be labeled a “Trump supporter.” Whenever he is not faithful to his own speech, I am just an evangelical Christian faithful to Jesus Christ. (Evangelicals were the main voting base for Trump.)
I am not a “die-hard Republican,” but I am a die-hard Christian.
If far left-wingers have a right to blame Hurricane Harvey on global warming, or its current label “climate change,” without being smeared by the mainstream press, why cannot Christians offer their view on destructive storms?
The “Die Hard Democrat” website understands that there would be no problem only if, instead of a possible divine judgement, I used its sacred cow “climate change” as a reason.
Why cannot there be an interpretation of possible judgement regarding Harvey? In my view, the “coincidences” are too many to dismiss such possibility.
In his 2016 campaign, when Trump was a pioneer with his speeches against neocons and Islam, I saw him as the only candidate and American who could deliver America from her prostitution with Saudi Arabia, which is the main sponsor of the Islamic terrorism around the world.
Yet, Trump as president has not been match for his brave 2016 speeches. In his first international trip, he chose Saudi Arabia as his first visit.
He sold US$ 110 billion in military equipment to Saudi Arabia. The White House claimed this sale represented the “largest single arms deal in U.S. history.” This was bloody money, because the Saudi-sponsored international terrorism also slaughters Christians.
Trump bragged about the deal, “Tremendous investments in the United States. Hundreds of billions of dollars of investments into the United States and jobs, jobs, jobs.” Bloody jobs.
Separately, U.S. companies in the oil center gained, in the Trump visit, US$ 22 billion in new deals with the state-owned oil company Saudi Aramco.
Yet, the bloody profits went down the drain. The profits of the U.S. military deal with the Saudis, which was the “largest single arms deal in U.S. history,” were virtually lost because of Hurricane Harvey, which hit hard Texas late August 2017 and was “the most destructive storm system to ever wreak havoc on the United States,” according to Shane Hubbard, a researcher from the University of Wisconsin's Space Science and Engineering Center.
Harvey was a 1-in-1,000-year flood, according to scientific data.
Hubbard said, “I’ve never seen anything of this magnitude or size. This is something that hasn’t happened in our modern era of observations.”
Because it is considered a 1,000-year event, the chances of Harvey happening in any given year is 0.1 percent.
“Or, a better way to think about it is that 99.9 percent of the time, such an event will never happen,” Hubbard said.
The Harvey devastation in Texas hit especially the petrochemical industry. While Gulf Coast chemical plants are designed to withstand hurricane-force winds and floods, they were not prepared for super-Hurricane Harvey.
In a headline titled “Harvey Has Made the World’s Most Important Chemical a Rare Commodity,” Bloomberg said,
“Few Americans care about ethylene. Many have probably never heard of it. As it turns out, this colorless, flammable gas is arguably the most important petrochemical on the planet — and much of it comes from the hurricane-stricken Gulf Coast. Ethylene is one of the big reasons the damage wrought by Hurricane Harvey in the chemical communities along the Gulf of Mexico is likely to ripple through U.S. manufacturing of essential items from milk jugs to mattresses. ‘Ethylene really is the major petrochemical that impacts the entire industry,’ said Chirag Kothari, an analyst at consultant Nexant.”
The most important U.S. refineries are exactly where Harvey hit hard. Port Arthur, in Texas, is considered the crown jewel of the US refinery system. The Port Arthur facility can process 600,000 barrels of oil per day, making it the largest refinery in North America. Harvey stopped it.
Under the Trump administration, Muslim Saudis took 100% control of the sprawling Port Arthur refinery on May. Now Saudi Arabia is the owner of America’s largest oil refinery. Port Arthur was one of the hardest hit by Harvey. Coincidence?
One week ago, a CNBC headline said that if Harvey’s uninsured losses top $150 billion, the whole U.S. economy would hurt.
This week Texas Governor Greg Abbott estimated damage from Hurricane Harvey at $150 billion to $180 billion, calling it more costly than epic hurricanes Katrina or Sandy and fueling a debate over how to pay for the disaster.
The U.S. economy has been hurt. Coincidence or not, it was hurt after Trump made a bloody deal with the Saudis, by selling over $100 billion in arms to Muslims engaged in wars and slaughters against Christians.
It is hard to believe that it was a coincidence. It is hard to believe that Harvey was a result of “climate change.”
Even so, “Die Hard Democrat” and Right Wing Watch, of People for the American Way, are annoyed with my Christian view. Right Wing Watch just loves to attack me regularly.
Yet, they would fully praise me if I were a die-hard Democrat and far left-winger, just as they are, blaming Harvey on global warming.
Thank God, I am a die-hard conservative evangelical Christian who does not believe in the fairy tale of global warming or climate change. I believe that, by reinforcing the National Day of Prayer for the United States, Trump can, by personal and national repentance, lead the United States to face its sinful realities and change course before other judgments as super-Hurricane Harvey happen.
The United States needs independence from Saudi Arabia and from neocons as John McCain. It is a national shame that the largest U.S. refinery is owned by the Saudis, who, with Obama and Hillary Clinton, created ISIS, which has committed genocide against Christians in the Middle East. Without repentance and independence, more “judgments” (which far left-wingers call “global warming effects”) will come.
With information from “Die Hard Democrat,” Bloomberg, DailyMail, Reuters, WND and CNN.
Recommended Reading:
For Engagement:
Recommended Reading on the U.S. Left against Julio Severo:

Sunday, May 10, 2015

Vatican Conference Criticized for Backing Abortion and Population Control Politics


Vatican Conference Criticized for Backing Abortion and Population Control Politics

Wendy Wright
Comment by Julio Severo: According to the Brazilian press, Leonardo Boff, the main Liberation Theology advocate in Brazil, has been one of pope’s advisors for global warming issues, including his upcoming encyclical on the environment.
NEW YORK, May (C-Fam) A Vatican conference to promote Pope Francis’ upcoming encyclical on the environment spotlighted abortion and population control proponents. At the same time critics warn that climate change alarmism ultimately harms the poor.
“The world’s poor desperately need abundant, affordable, reliable energy, and Sachs and Ban would deprive them of it,” said Calvin Beisner, referring to UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon and Jeffrey Sachs, director of the Earth Institute at Columbia University, both of whom met with the Pope and his advisers this past week.
The presence of both men as guests of the Pope raised eyebrows. Ban Ki-moon has been a proponent of abortion at the UN, going so far as promoting it in conflict areas where abortion is illegal. Sachs is a proponent of population control and fought to get “reproductive health” — used to promote abortion — included in the Millennium Development Goals.
“Policies to fight alarmist global warming will condemn the world’s poor to more generations of misery and early death,” said Beisner.
Beisner was in Rome to provide an alternative view to those invited to the Vatican conference. The author of “Prospects for Growth: A Biblical View of Population, Resources, and the Future” delivered an Open Letter signed by nearly 150 scientists, religious and policy leaders.
Fossil fuels “generate energy to lift billions of God’s precious children out of poverty” and “liberate[s] from the tomb of the earth the carbon dioxide on which plants and therefore all the rest of life depend,” the letter states. “This beautifully reveals the Creator’s wisdom and care for all of His creation—people, animals, plants, and the earth itself.”
Scientists and religious leaders at the Vatican conference agreed to a Declaration that took an alarmist tone. One attendee writing in Slate called the event a “Sermon on the Mount moment.”
“Human-induced climate change is a scientific reality, and its decisive mitigation is a moral and religious imperative for humanity,” it states.
Ban Ki-moon plugged the Pope’s encyclical to be released in June. “It will convey to the world that protecting our environment is an urgent moral imperative and a sacred duty for all people of faith and people of conscience,” he said.
He urged religious leaders to do more to secure success for a highly anticipated UN conference on climate change this December – a process that has failed to reach agreement thus far.
“It is critically important that people and their leaders hear your strong moral voice in the coming months,” he said.
The Vatican declaration warns the UN conference “may be the last effective opportunity to negotiate arrangements that keep human-induced warming below 2 degrees C” and calls for a “rapid world transformation to a world powered by renewable and other low-carbon energy.”
At a press conference Ban Ki-moon called on countries to raise $100 billion per year to help developing countries transition to a green economy.
“We have only a handful of years before the window of opportunity closes forever,” he said.
Tom Harris of the International Climate Science Coalition said, “Pope Francis must have the courage to ignore the politically correct but irresponsible advice of his advisors and simply tell the truth.”
“Climate will continue to change no matter what we do. So let’s help the world’s poor to the degree we can afford by providing them with reliable, inexpensive electricity and stop pretending we have a crystal ball to future climate states.”
Source: Friday Fax
Divulgation: Last Days Watchman
Recommended Reading:
End of communism not good for Catholicism?

Tuesday, February 10, 2015

Landmark Event: Pope Will Address U.S. Congress


Landmark Event: Pope Will Address U.S. Congress

By Julio Severo
For the first time in the U.S. history, a pope will address the Congress, invited by Republican John Boehner and Democrat Nancy Pelosi.
When he speaks to American lawmakers September 24, Pope Francis will address a Congress that is 31 percent Catholic, well above the 22 percent of all the American population, according to a survey released last month by the nonpartisan Pew Research Center. Boehner and Pelosi are both Catholic.
“We’re humbled that the Holy Father has accepted our invitation and certainly look forward to receiving his message on behalf of the American people,” said Boehner, the most powerful Republican in the House of Representatives.
“Hearing his call to live our values, to protect the poor and the needy, and to promote peace,” said Pelosi, the most powerful Democrat in the House of Representatives.
Francis, an Argentinian Jesuit and the first pope from the Western Hemisphere, has made the cornerstone of his papacy calling on wealthy nations to “help the poor.”
According to the Associated Press, he plans to use his trip to the U.S. to urge world leaders to take bold steps to curb global warming. He also plans to release an encyclical on climate change, which he says is mostly manmade.
“He has a track record of challenging people,” said Mathew Schmalz, a religious studies professor at the College of the Holy Cross in Worcester, Massachusetts.
Even though many Republicans are not going to like what Francis will say about global warming, it is certain that many Democrats will not like some of Francis’ views, either.
He has condemned abortion and the use of artificial contraception, and called marriage between a man and a woman a “fundamental pillar” of society. However, different from John Paul II, he has not emphasized these issues. His focus has been fighting poverty.
Obama said he was eager to welcome the pope to the U.S.
“Like so many people around the world, I’ve been touched by his call to relieve suffering, and to show justice and mercy and compassion to the most vulnerable,” Obama said.
Obama’ sincerity is a problem. His administration and political life are rife with pro-abortion activism — a serious threat to the most vulnerable of the vulnerable.
America needs Christian leaders to challenge her directly to repent and abandon her wicked ways. Will Francis match this responsibility? It is not impossible to do so.
In the 1994 National Prayer Breakfast with President Bill Clinton, Mother Teresa straightforwardly condemned legal abortion in America and treated its innocent victims as the most defenseless and vulnerable in the U.S. society.
She challenged Clinton and U.S. authorities to protect these victims.
This was her last breakfast with Clinton.
It is doubtful that Pope Francis will imitate her courageous pro-life speech. In a 2013 papal visit to Brazil, when socialist Brazilian President Dilma Rousseff was considering making abortion legal — which she did —, Francis never mentioned abortion and child-killing to her.
Pope John Paul II, a true pro-life apostle, would have deserved the honor to address the U.S. Congress. Surely, he would focus on pro-life issues, as Mother Teresa did.
But what to expect from Francis? The U.S. media is certain, and glad, that he will focus on global warming and “fighting poverty.” In fact, he and Obama have now an alliance against global warming.
What to expect from the American Catholics who invited Francis? Nancy Pelosi’s socialist stances are well representative of Democrats, including Obama: pro-abortion, pro-homosexuality, pro-culture of death.
What to expect from John Boehner? According to the Daily Beast, Boehner said, “We won’t fight gay marriage.” Reportedly, he basically said the Republican Party will no longer stand in the way of gay “marriage.”
Such “beautiful” opposition! Democrats and other socialists advance their socialist evils, and “courteous” Republicans let them go forward.
Their mutual Catholic courtesy is now bringing Francis, a pope not prominent (as John Paul II and Mother Teresa were) in pro-life issues, but highly prominent and praised, including by homosexual magazines, for his “tolerance” — even for Islam. Last year he said that “it is wrong to equate Islam with violence.”
Be it as it may, Boehner’s courtesy to homosexual “marriage” is very troubling.
According to Scott Lively, “Ancient Rabbinical tradition holds that homosexuality, more specifically homosexual marriage, was the ‘final insult’ to God which caused Him to bring that Great Flood which only Noah and his family survived.” So, if Republicans are unwilling to fight homosexual “marriage,” what is their party good for?
Even Russia, criticized and condemned by Democrats and Republicans, by U.S. homosexual activists and right-wingers, by Pelosi and Boehner, by Obama and McCain, has successfully resisted homosexual “marriage” and other socialist evils. If the Republican Party is unable to do so, what is it good for?
Some Catholics in Brazil are rejoicing that America is “more Catholic” today. At least the U.S. Congress is more Catholic than all the American population.
They rejoice that for the first time in the U.S. history, a pope will address the U.S. Congress, invited by two prominent Catholics: John Boehner and Nancy Pelosi.
If a higher number of Catholics is enough reason for a sense of victory, they should rejoice over the U.S. Supreme Court, which began 200 years ago with Protestants, but today all of its Christian members are Catholic. The Supreme Court is no longer Protestant, but it is more pro-abortion and pro-sodomy than ever.
So, is there reason for rejoicing over Democrat Pelosi and her pro-abortion and pro-homosexuality obsession?
Is there reason for rejoicing over Republican Boehner and his unwillingness to fight homosexual “marriage” and other socialist evils?
Is there reason for rejoicing over a pope focused on global warming and highly praised by liberals around the world?
Will their Catholicism save America?
If a higher number of Catholics were a sign of hope, Brazil, the largest Catholic nation in the world, would be the most conservative and anti-Marxist country in the world. No. Marxist Liberation Theology is rampant among Brazilian Catholics, as it is rampant among Catholics in Latin America.
According to a recent BBC report in Spanish and Portuguese by Jaime Gonzalez, American conservatives see Francis as Marxist and radical environmentalist. No surprise: he is from Latin America. Actually, the BBC report was defending him against U.S. conservatives!
The pope’s socialist Catholicism is not different from the Brazilian Catholicism. So it is just natural for Pelosi, a Catholic socialist, to invite him. Yet, if American conservatives see him as Marxist, why does Boehner, the most powerful Republican in the House of Representatives, want him addressing the Congress? It only makes sense if you understand that the Catholic Republican does not want fight homosexual “marriage.” Is he, with Pelosi and the pope, considering fighting global warming too?
By the way, I have never rejoiced that Obama, Clinton and other liberal U.S. presidents are Protestants.
Their liberal Protestantism is part of the problems America has today just as liberal Catholicism is part of the problems of Brazil.
May Pope Francis and the U.S. Congress someday have his eyes open to see these problems.
With information from the Associated Press and The Daily Beast.
Portuguese version of this article: Evento histórico: papa falará no Congresso dos EUA
Recommended Reading: