Marxist Movement Black Lives Matter Is Imported by Brazilian Agitators Who Spread Radicalism, Terror and Violence in Brazil

By Julio Severo

In a headline, British newspaper DailyMail said on November 21, 2020: “Violence erupts after black man is beaten to death by supermarket security guards on eve of Brazil’s Black Consciousness Day.”

BLM smashing front windows of Carrefour

Although the word racism appears 5 times in the report, the police investigation did not indicate racism at the Carrefour supermarket. And DailyMail did not explain the violent conduct of João Alberto Silveira Freitas, the alleged victim of racism.

It all started when Freitas started arguing with a Carrefour female employee. The woman, fearing Freitas’s violence, called security.

When he was taken by security guards, Freitas attacked them, as shown in images. His violent action provoked a violent reaction from security guards, and the case ended in Freitas’s death.

DailyMail pointed out that Freitas was a victim of violence, but did not comment on the violence he practiced. In fact, Freitas and violence is not a case that started at Carrefour.

According to the Brazilian Court of Justice, Freitas had an extensive police record of violence and personal injury against people, including women.

So the Carrefour female employee did well to call security. She was really at risk of being beaten.

DailyMail has not revealed any of this information to its readers.

DailyMail said nothing about the woman who was under threat of violence from Freitas.

DailyMail also did not explain whether women will now be unable to call security guards or the police if they are assaulted by black men.

Speaking to reporters, Brazilian Vice President Hamilton Mourao, who is racially mixed as Indian and black, lamented the incident at Carrefour, but denied it reflected racism.

“Racism doesn’t exist in Brazil. That is something they want to import here,” Mourao said, according to DailyMail.

Despite this, agitators and importers linked to the Marxist movement Black Lives Matter started a wave of violence in Brazil. DailyMail said:

“In Sao Paulo, protesters smashed the front window of a Carrefour, scattered goods from shelves over the floor and set a fire that employees hurried to extinguish.”

The only problem is that DailyMail was extremely kind to the agitators, calling them “protesters.” Does this mean that if agitators smash the front windows of the DailyMail building and set a fire, the British newspaper will kindly call them “protesters”?

Ultra-leftist Baptist pastor Ronilso Pacheco, who is a Brazilian immigrant in the U.S., complained to CNN of Brazil about a report that showed the violence of the rioters. Ronilso said:

“It is good for @CNNBrasil to know. Your headline is unfortunate. Your journalism on this issue is still so mediocre because you still do not understand how to distinguish the life of a battered black person and the smashing of a window.”

For Ronilso, breaking stores is insignificant compared to “racism” — even though in the case of Freitas what started the violence was not racism, but his own violence.

Dr. Guilherme Schelb, one of the greatest legal authorities in Brazil, said:

“Black and violent man with extensive police record of violent crimes. He punches supermarket security (there is a video). Security guards react brutally. Police Chief rules out racially motivated crime.”

Although Ronilso believes that the Freitas case should be labeled “racism” and that to combat this, no violence against commercial stores should be considered violence, his extremist stance is not shared by all blacks.

Sérgio Camargo, a black man in the administration of Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro for racial reasons, said:

“The only ‘black genocide’ in Brazil is that of police, which occurs in the face of the indifference of the black movement, the media and militant artists. Honest Lives Matter! Of every 3 police officers killed, 2 are of African descent. I do not remember the politically “correct” anti-racism reds manifesting themselves so vehemently when a police officer who declares himself black or brown is killed. Depredation to discuss racism is a disservice.”

He also said:

“The extremist and criminal tactics of Black Lives Matter, imported into Brazil, equate the black movement with neo-Nazis — similar objectives and methods; just their signals are different.”

He nailed it when he said that the Marxist extremist movement Black Lives Matter was imported into Brazil. Without knowing anything about Freitas’s criminal record, Black Lives Matter, on its Twitter account on November 21, 2020, said:

“We stand in solidarity with the folks protesting in Brazil after João Alberto Silveira Freitas, a 40 year old Black man, was murdered by Carrefour supermarket security, one being an off duty temporary military police officer.”

Black Lives Matter, which treated Freitas’s case as “racism,” was only showing support for its own agitators and importers in Brazil. The phrase “Black Lives Matter” was painted on Paulista Ave, the most important avenue in São Paulo, the economic capital of Brazil.

The big concern now is whether any black criminal who commits violence and in reaction suffers violence will benefit from the defense of this ultra-leftist movement.

For Ronilso, smashing front windows, setting fires and committing violence against Carrefour is not enough. Carrefour closed the store where Freitas was killed. The manager and hundreds of employees, including blacks, lost their jobs.

But for Ronilso and his extremist activism, this is not enough. In a tweet of November 20, 2020, he said:

“A black man beaten to death inside Carrefour and that did not affect the company’s performance in the financial market at all. It is useless to say that black lives matter, while the money that moves the world continues to ignore black lives and treat them like trash.”

Sticking forcedly the label of racism in the Freitas case, Ronilso said:

“Racism and the market. I want to know what @UnileverBrasil, @fundacaobunge, @PepsiCoBrasil, @BrasilColgate, @NIVEABRASIL and other Carrefour suppliers have to say. The issue is not limited to police violence.”

Does he want all suppliers to boycott Carrefour so that all blacks, including blacks with a criminal record and even blacks who start violence at Carrefour, are treated as sacred, divine and untouchable?

Black Sérgio Camargo got it right. Black Lives Matter’s extremist and criminal tactics are being imported into Brazil.

They are being imported by extremists like Ronilso, who today lives in New York studying theology at an ultra-left university.

Directly from New York and financially very supported, Ronilso inflames his extremist contacts in Brazil with the extremist ideology of Black Lives Matter.

Ronilso is a weird Marxist. Usually, Marxists complain about everything imported from the United States, saying it is imperialism. But he is very shamelessly importing Black Lives Matter into Brazil. Importing and praising other importers. Importing and living in the nation itself producing imperialist Marxist products. Marxist imperialism and black supremacism are what really matter to them.

Yet, smart blacks like Sérgio Camargo have already seen that Ronilso is nothing more than a well-supported agitator and importer who needs to use any true or fake case of racism to spread the hate ideology that gives him fame and money.

I am not defending Carrefour and the way its security guards treat violent and abusive men, but if agitators and importers are successful against Carrefour, then in their greed for power and money they will be able to choose Christian companies and even churches as their victims.

Portuguese version of this article: Movimento marxista Black Lives Matter é importado por agitadores brasileiros que espalham radicalismo, terror e violência no Brasil

Source: Last Days Watchman

Recommended Reading:

To remain in the spotlight of mainstream leftist media, Baptist minister uses Marxist hate speech to attack conservative Baptists in Brazil

Brazilian Baptist minister, who is an immigrant in the U.S., calls the Trump administration “wretched administration” regarding COVID-19 and says that Trump makes clearly racist statements that incite violence

Left-wing Baptist theologian defends BLM against conservative evangelicals and says that pro-life and pro-family groups fit under Anti-Terrorism Law

While black lives are lost in abortion and broken homes, “Black Lives Matter” movement preaches Marxism, which fuels the destruction of the black family through abortion and broken homes

Africa Calls African-Americans To Return to Their Original Home in Africa

Brazilian Left-Wing Sorcerer with History of Fight against Conservative Christians Is Awarded by the Trump Administration

Left-wing Baptist theologian defends BLM against conservative evangelicals and says that pro-life and pro-family groups fit under Anti-Terrorism Law

By Julio Severo

In his August 18, 2020 article “Brazilian Fundamentalist Evangelicals Aim at Black Lives Matter” in his column in the left-wing website The Intercept, Brazilian black activist and Baptist theologian Ronilso Pacheco talks about “persecution against BLM” (Black Lives Matter) by conservative evangelicals, whom he accuses of “white supremacists.” And he says that “Like their U.S. counterparts, fundamentalists in Brazil are accusing the anti-racist movement of fighting for the end of the traditional family and burning Bibles.”

Ronilso Pacheco

He said that conservative evangelicals, whom he accused of being “racist” and “fundamentalist,” use “fallacious arguments and lies,” but he himself used such arguments. His article declares BLM not guilty of burning Bibles in a “protest,” saying that anonymous protestors did it. Even so, he spent some time explaining that the fact that protestors burned the U.S. flag and a Bible is not a problem. He told that there would be a problem if they had burned several Bibles…

Ronilso Pacheco

Even knowing that BLM founder Patrisse Cullors said “We are trained Marxists,” Pacheco refuses the see reality just as it is. For him, BLM, which provokes riots and loots, is not a violent hate group. For him, conservative evangelicals, who provoke no riots and loots, are a violent hate group.

According to Alex Newman in The New American, Cullors also revealed that she is consulting spiritual entities and allowing them to “work through” her. “I’m calling for spirituality to be deeply radical,” she said. “We’re not just having a social justice movement, this is a spiritual movement.”

“What they [BLM adherents] are describing is their adherence to the Yoruba religion of Ifa, to where they are summoning dead spirits,” said talk-show host and Christian attorney Abraham Hamilton.

The Yoruba were known for practicing human sacrifice in Africa until Christianity became more prevalent and abolished the sacrifices.

According to Howard University:

“What is significant about the Yoruba people is that they kept their religion hidden under the guise of Catholicism, or [traditional] Protestantism… Cuban Santeria; Haitian Vodun (voodoo); Brazilian Candomble; Trinidad and Tobago Shango are all Yoruba or Orisha based. All of these religions are African derived religions having different names in different countries. They combine beliefs from the Kabbalah and Yoruba speaking peoples of West/Central Africa, with elements of Catholicism or Anglicanism.”

So it is not wonder that BLM is able to disguise its African witchcraft under some Christian elements.

Yoruba, with its orishas (called demons in Christianity), has brought untold misery, suffering, poverty and prostitution (including homosexual) to Africa and Latin America through Santeria, voodoo and Candomble.

The religion of Yoruba, with its Orishas, is the religion most loved by Nigerian mafias involved in sex trafficking and slavery in Nigeria and Europe. These mafias invoke Orishas to protect their criminal business and threaten victims. But probably BLM and Ronilso Pacheco would not be interested in African blacks sexually enslaving black women and girls.

Pacheco’s inflammatory language demonizing conservative evangelicals and justifying BLM is what any Marxist would do. And he demonizes pro-lifers too.

Based on the case of a Brazilian 10-year-old girl raped by her uncle, Pacheco defends abortion by saying that it was “[the girl’s] desire to terminate her pregnancy,” in a bizarre contrast in which at the same time as leftists claimed that the girl was too young to understand what pregnancy is, they also claim that she understood that forced abortion was necessary, justifying capital punishment for the baby who was a rape victim, but no capital punishment for the rapist.

In his article entitled “Pro-life and pro-family groups are hate groups that use the Bible as an alibi,” published on the Brazilian website UOL, Pacheco, who is a Baptist minister, expressed concern about “the extent and mobilization of the pro-life and pro -family movement.”

Among other far-left-wing statements, Pacheco said:

“Pro-life and pro-family groups fit much more into the so-called ‘Anti-Terrorism Law’ than many left-wing groups and social movements accused of using violence and vandalism.”

“Pro-family and pro-life groups are hate groups. They were born that way in the United States, they remain that way in Brazil. It is not by chance that its emergence in the 1940s and 1950s and its hardening in the 1960s and 1970s is directly linked to a conservative and white reaction in the United States. And its roots go even further, in the slavery period.”

Framing the pro-life movement as a terrorist movement is an idea accepted only among the most radical extremists on the left.

Actually, the modern pro-life movement was born in the U.S., but Pacheco was wrong to say that this movement was born in the 1940s. It was actually born in the late 19th century, as I demonstrate in my article “Anthony Comstock: the first pro-life activist in the modern history.”

By trying to link the pro-life movement to issues of slavery, Pacheco only proves that he imported the black supremacist agenda from the U.S., which uses any and all issues to blame whites for everything that is bad and to portray the black supremacist movement as eternally deserving tax money, political advantages and treats from the leftist media.

Pacheco’s ideological blindness prevents him from seeing that black women abort their babies almost five times more than white women. Thus, when the pro-life movement fights to save babies, black baby lives are especially benefited. Accusing anyone who saves these babies from having slavery connections is an insanity worthy of the extremism of black supremacism.

With a typical far-left-wing imagination, Pacheco argues that “abortion was known to be one of the many strategies that enslaved black women in the United States found to stop the enslavement of their descendants.”

For Pacheco, abortion for black women is justified because they use it to save their future generations from white oppression!

Going even further in his extremism, Pacheco says: “Pro-life groups are emerging as a reaction to civil rights movements.” He argues that a movement that saves the lives of black babies is a movement against black rights. I’ve read a lot of madness in leftist texts, but Pacheco’s statements, 100 percent imported from the black supremacist movement in the U.S., deserve the Oscar of aberrations.

Pacheco then says:

“In the 1960s and 1970s, the Civil Rights movement, which left the traditional white family at bay, would be added by the sexual liberation movement, the first gay parade after the Stonewall episode, the feminist fight for women’s autonomy and the first decision in the history of the Supreme Court in 1973 to liberalize legal abortion. It is not by chance that the oldest pro-life and pro-family organizations appear in this period. It is not a recovery of religious order, it is not just a preservation of morality, it is the maintenance of a structure of violence and subjection in which the Bible will only appear as an alibi, and not as a principle.”

It is obvious that Pacheco is receiving training from U.S. black supremacist movements. It is impossible to say that he is not receiving funds and other economic incentives as an evangelist for this extremism. After all, who is paying his bills while he is living in New York? Who is paying his bills while he, as an immigrant in the U.S., uses his articles and Twitter to attack Trump and praise the Democratic Party?

Pacheco raises the ideas of the black American supremacist movement as if they had been the decisive factor for the liberation of black slaves, when history clearly shows that white evangelicals started this fight. If it depended on blacks, slavery would exist in the U.S. and Brazil today. In fact, today Africa continues with its ancient tradition, existing long before the first European stepped on African soil, of slavery. Blacks enslaving blacks.

According to the Global Slavery Index,

“On any given day in 2016, an estimated 9.2 million men, women, and children were living in modern slavery in Africa. The region has the highest rate of prevalence, with 7.6 people living in modern slavery for every 1,000 people in the region.”

That is, right in the 21st century, Africa has the highest global rate of modern slavery. To this day, Africa does not celebrate the end of slavery because blacks have never stopped enslaving blacks.

However, instead of moving to Africa to help blacks who now live as slaves under black bosses, Pacheco prefers to embrace the radicalism of U.S. black supremacism, which uses issues of over 150 years ago to profit from companies and government.

If Pacheco does not want to move to Africa because of its endemic poverty, he can move to oil-rich Saudi Arabia where blacks desperately need help. According to a 2020 report from the British newspaper The Telegraph titled “Investigation: African migrants ‘left to die’ in Saudi Arabia’s hellish Covid detention centres,” African immigrants in Saudi Arabia are suffering unimaginable horrors. The report said,

Saudi Arabia, one of the wealthiest countries on earth, is keeping hundreds if not thousands of African migrants locked in heinous conditions reminiscent of Libya’s slave camps as part of a drive to stop the spread of Covid-19, an investigation by The Sunday Telegraph has found.

The migrants, several displaying scars on their backs, claim they are beaten by guards who hurl racial abuse at them. “It’s hell in here. We are treated like animals and beaten every day,” said Abebe, an Ethiopian who has been held at one of the centres for more than four months. “My only crime is leaving my country in search of a better life. But they beat us with whips and electric cords as if we were murderers.”

Oil-rich Saudi Arabia has long exploited migrant labour from Africa and Asia. In June 2019, an estimated 6.6m foreign workers made up about 20 per cent of the Gulf nation’s population, most occupying low paid and often physically arduous jobs.

“We eat a tiny piece of bread in the day and rice in the evening. There’s almost no water, and the toilets are overflowing. It spills over to where we eat. The smell, we grow accustomed to. But there’s over a hundred of us in a room, and the heat is killing us,” said another young Ethiopian man.

African migrants enjoy few legal rights and many complain of exploitation, sexual and racial abuse from employers.

African Muslims know very well that they are mistreated in Saudi Arabia. Even so, they immigrate to this dictatorial Islamic nation because in Africa they have lived virtually in poverty and slavery for thousands of years.

Pacheco and his BLM allies should be challenged to move to Saudi Arabia and help blacks. Or at least they could travel to Saudi Arabia to do some protests.

Pacheco then concludes his far-left-wing text against pro-life and pro-family groups by saying:

“It is not possible to demand consistency in the messages of Jesus by fundamentalist evangelical groups in the pro-life and pro-family movements… The best thing to do is to face the fact that a group of racist, sexist, classist, violent and rights-denying origin it is increasingly stronger, more aggressive, and they will use from the Bible to Constitutional Law to maintain their ideal society project.”

It is a shame for the Baptist Church to keep Pacheco as a minister as his real occupation is U.S. black supremacist activism.

According to the far-left-wing website Intercept, where Pacheco is a columnist, he is:

“Theologian formed by the Pontifical Catholic University in Rio, activist, assistant minister in the Baptist Church in São Gonçalo, author of ‘Occupy, Resist, Subvert’ (2016) and ‘Black Theology: The Anti-Racist-Breath of the Spirit’ (2019); studying theology at Union Theological Seminary (Columbia University) in NY.”

The Union Theological Seminary is one of the oldest and left-wing theological institutions in the United States.

According to The Christian Post:

“A New York Times interview with the theologian Serene Jones, the current president of Union Theological Seminary, is getting some attention given that Jones enthusiastically tosses multiple cherished doctrines of Christian orthodoxy. Virgin birth? ‘Bizarre,’ she says. God as omnipotent and omniscient? ‘A fabrication of Roman juridical theory and Greek mythology.’ The resurrection of Jesus? Pfft! ‘For me, the message of Easter is that love is stronger than life or death. That’s a much more awesome claim than that they put Jesus in the tomb and three days later he wasn’t there.’”

The president of the Union Theological Seminary believes that Jesus was not born of a virgin and still finds this idea “bizarre.” She believes that God’s omnipotence and omniscience are fabrications. And she doesn’t believe in Jesus’ resurrection.

So Pacheco is graduating from a radically left-wing theological institution, importing all this extremism into Brazil, and he wants to convince the Brazilian evangelical public that his import is good, but that the import of the U.S. pro-life movement is bad.

The rise of Pacheco as a prominent left-wing evangelical, who is now a Brazilian immigrant in the U.S., was a problem created by the U.S. In 2017, to cover the fantastic phenomenon that “Evangelical Christians are the fastest-growing political movement in Brazil,” the National Public Radio, owned by the U.S. government, produced the report “Brazilian Street Preacher Spreads Progressive Message,” totally dedicated to Ronilso Pacheco, whom NPR described as “A preacher in Rio de Janeiro [who] is attracting crowds through a combination of evangelical traditions and liberation theology.”

NPR also said, “Pacheco, a Brazilian Baptist, is part of a growing group of progressive evangelicals who go against the current of conservative evangelical megachurches,” adding, “He finds inspiration from the 1960s in Brazil when progressive Protestants mixed with Catholic liberation theologists to become major players in leftist organizing.”

Liberation theology preached by Pacheco has nothing to do with the evangelical growth in Brazil. This massive evangelical growth is conservative, not liberal. So NPR should spotlight conservative evangelicals. But NPR decided to spotlight a radical left-wing evangelical against such movement.

It is not the first time the U.S. government grants prominence to left-wing blacks who are against conservative evangelicals. In 2019, the Trump administration awarded a Brazilian left-wing black sorcerer with a history of fight against conservative evangelicals.

A 29 July 2020 report titled “Brazil: How progressive theologians hope to re-establish dialogue with the Christian right” in the Sight magazine mentioned several left-wing Catholics and Protestants. Among Protestants, it mentioned Ariovaldo Ramos, former director of World Vision Brazil, and Ronilso Pacheco, described by Sight as the author of “a book about black Liberation Theology in Brazil.”

Sight should be renamed Blindness, because it was unable to see the Marxist dangers of Liberation Theology. Sight said,

“The [Liberation Theology] movement also suffered with the offensive of the neo-Pentecostal churches that began to grow in poor, working-class neighbourhoods all over Brazil in the 1980s. Since then, Liberation Theology declined as a social phenomenon…”

It is a real conclusion. Fernando Haddad, a socialist candidate defeated by right-wing Jair Bolsonaro in the 2018 Brazilian presidential election, attributed his defeat to the neo-Pentecostals (neo-charismatics) and their Prosperity Gospel.

Quoting Ariovaldo Ramos, Sight complained:

“Most of the flourishing Brazilian neo-Pentecostalists gradually allied with far right-wing ideas, reacting with particular criticism to moral changes in society and in Christianism, explains pastor Ramos.”

Interestingly, many Brazilian conservative mega-churches are led by black charismatic ministers. But Pacheco and Ramos condemn them just because they do not follow Liberation Theology. Pacheco is working to lead black evangelicals in Brazil to his Liberation Theology.

Pacheco has been propagandized by many other left-wing publications. The Immanent Frame said,

“A significant bloc of evangelicals diverges from the fundamentalist Pentecostalism described above. [Left-wing] Benedita da Silva, Brazil’s first Black woman deputy, senator, and Rio state governor, has for decades invoked her evangelical [Presbyterian] faith and collaboration with liberationist Catholics in her social struggles and political career. She even drew the attention of Jesse Jackson, who wrote the English-edition preface to her biography. [Left-wing] Baptist pastors such as Jardim Gramacho, RJ’s Waldimir de Souza, São Gonçalo’s Ronilso Pacheco, and Niteroi’s Henrique Viera continue efforts to ‘marry’ evangelical faith and social awareness [Liberation Theology], a regional effort among prominent socially minded Latin American evangelicals since the 1974 First International Congress on World Evangelization (ICOWE) in Lausanne, Switzerland. Evangelical pastors help to rebuild terreiros [temples of voodoo] that militias burnt down. Black Baptist pastors also lead the field of anti-racist education. Babalawo [sorcerer], racial justice [black Liberation Theology] advocate, and educator Ivanir dos Santos even won a 2019 religious liberty award from Trump’s State Department—ostensibly Bolsonaro’s geopolitical ally.”

Even a left-wing publication found a perplexing case that the Trump administration awarding a left-wing sorcerer.

The fact that left-wingers use Lausanne as base for their left-wing activism is explained by my article: “Karl Marx’s Spirit in Lausanne: Theology of Integral Mission.”

Ronilso Pacheco’s “Black Theology” is black, but not from skin-colored. It is sheer black Liberation Theology. It is black from the dense leftist darkness of a white European man named Karl Marx, who fills with hatred and revolts all the hearts idolizing him. Pacheco has become one of those idolaters.

If instead of spending money and staying at the liberal Union Theological Seminary in NY, Pacheco had gone to Africa as a missionary to free slaves, the investment would have been much more useful. But unlike Brazil and the U.S., where extremists use the theme of slavery to get money and funds without suffering violence, in Africa they would be beaten or lynched by black bosses who refuse to free their black slaves.

While Pacheco is busy importing extremism from the American left into Brazil, we in the pro-life movement will continue to be busy saving the lives of babies — including black babies, who are among the biggest victims of legal abortion.

And we conservative evangelicals will keep proclaiming the Gospel, healing the sick and casting out demons, including from pseudo-Christians who mix ideas of Christianity with Marxism, orishas and other demons.

Portuguese version of this article: Teólogo batista esquerdista defende BLM contra evangélicos conservadores e diz que grupos pró-vida e pró-família se enquadram na Lei Antiterrorismo

Source: Last Days Watchman

Recommended Reading:

While black lives are lost in abortion and broken homes, “Black Lives Matter” movement preaches Marxism, which fuels the destruction of the black family through abortion and broken homes

Africa Calls African-Americans To Return to Their Original Home in Africa

Brutal Nigerian Mafia, Which Uses Witchcraft, Advancing in Sweden

Brazilian Left-Wing Sorcerer with History of Fight against Conservative Christians Is Awarded by the Trump Administration

While black lives are lost in abortion and broken homes, “Black Lives Matter” movement preaches Marxism, which fuels the destruction of the black family through abortion and broken homes

By Julio Severo

Violent riots, loots, burned buildings, violent confrontation with police, killed civilians and police officers — this is the “trademark” of violent individuals brought up in broken homes. And, by chance, it is also the “trademark” of a Marxist movement called “Black Lives Matter.”

BLM co-founder Patrisse Cullors and Karl Marx

“Black Lives Matter” seeks to destroy the U.S. Law & Order, originally based on Christian principles (of Protestant orientation), and replace it with the Marxist Law & Order. Every Marxist nation has a tight control over their citizens, or slaves, through the Marxist Law & Order. The Soviet Union, which had excessive Marxist Law & Order, is an example.

To destroy the U.S. Law & Order and establish the Marxist Law & Order, what does “Black Lives Matter” preach?

The official website of “Black Lives Matter” says:

“We disrupt the Western-prescribed nuclear family structure…”

“We foster a [homosexualist] queer‐affirming network.”

“We are guided by the fact that all Black lives matter, regardless of actual or perceived sexual identity, gender identity, gender expression…”

All of these ideas are Marxist. And they are no wonder, because “Black Lives Matter” was founded in Marxist principles.

Black Lives Matter co-founder Patrisse Cullors said on July 22, 2015,

“We actually do have an ideological frame. Myself and Alicia [Garza] in particular, we're trained organizers. We are trained Marxists. We are super versed on ideological theories.”

There is a huge rage in the U.S. black population. This rage has been channeled to Marxism.

The website Afro says,

“Only 38.7 Percent of African-American Minors Live with Both Parents.”

“… more than one-third of all Black children in the United States under the age of 18 live with unmarried mothers—compared to 6.5 percent of White children.”

And an abortion group said,

“In the United States, the abortion rate for black women is almost five times that for white women.”

Even though there are more white women than black women in the U.S., the fact is that more black women kill their babies through abortion than white women do.

For the Marxist “Black Lives Matter,” the thousands and thousands of lives of black unborn babies do not matter. So clearly it is not a movement with a real interest in defending black lives.

The main culprit for the destruction of black homes and abortion is the U.S. government. In the 1960s, the U.S. government launched a comprehensive social program, in answer to Martin Luther King, to make “reparations” to the black population by giving them many social aids.

With this “reparations,” black single mothers would receive government aid: cash, food, housing, job and whatever they needed. Yet, instead of helping, this social program normalized bad choices, broken homes and single parenting.

In the past, a young black woman should look for a responsible man to feed and support her. With the social program, she was free to choose any man or no man. With government support, such women had a legion of fatherless children, the main component of gangs and criminality.

To “help” such women not have so many fatherless children, the U.S. government has given to them the taxpayer “privilege” to abort their children. That is, the U.S. government has paid for their abortion.

The biggest tragedy in the U.S. black population was government interventions to “help” them. In the process of such help, the black family has been destroyed and black babies have been massively aborted.

And a huge legion of fatherless blacks live in rage and revolt as direct consequence of government interventions and aids, and Marxism and its groups, including “Black Lives Matter,” have channeled their rage.

I have fought abortion for over 30 years. And because abortion kills many black babies, my fight shows that black lives matter. But Marxist movements, including “Black Lives Matter,” have no real concern for black lives, especially black babies.

The “Black Lives Matter” movement has been free, in a U.S. society founded on Christian principles, to incite black people into provoking violent riots, burning buildings, making violent confrontation with police and killing civilians and police officers. They have rejected the traditional Law & Order.

In an Islamic society as Saudi Arabia where Islamic Law & Order rule supremely, they would be executed long before thinking about inciting black people to riots.

In a Marxist society where Marxist Law & Order rule supremely, they would have no freedom to preach riots. They would be executed.

“Black Lives Matter” have been able to do riots and much more in the United States because they have been given excessive freedom, they have received excessive government aid and because the traditional male authority has been destroyed in the black homes and in the larger society.

A healthy male authority is essential for a health Law & Order. But what can be seen in the U.S., especially in the broken fatherless black homes, is women leading. In the larger society, women and homosexuals are presented as the perfect and moderate authority figures.

Without strong male authority, it is impossible for the U.S. to control the rage of fatherless blacks controlled by Marxism.

Without stopping funding single-parenting, broken homes and abortion among blacks, it is impossible for the U.S. government to stop Marxism from channeling rage among them.

Portuguese version of this article: Enquanto vidas negras são perdidas no aborto e em lares desfeitos, o movimento “Vidas Negras Importam” prega o marxismo, que alimenta a destruição da família negra através do aborto e de lares desfeitos

Source: Last Days Watchman

Recommended Reading:

Africa Calls African-Americans To Return to Their Original Home in Africa