Friday, November 29, 2019

London Muslim killer, 28, was jailed for eight years in 2012 for plotting to bomb the London Stock Exchange and build an Islamic terror training camp, but was released in 2018


London Muslim killer, 28, was jailed for eight years in 2012 for plotting to bomb the London Stock Exchange and build an Islamic terror training camp, but was released in 2018

By Julio Severo
Two people were killed on November 28, 2019, and up to twelve were injured after a Muslim pulled the knives on innocent people on the north side of London Bridge.
Several people were stabbed before he was stopped in his tracks on London Bridge. He was shot by police officers and he died at the scene.
Scotland Yard has named the terrorist responsible for the attack on London Bridge as 28-year-old Usman Khan.
Assistant Commissioner Neil Basu confirmed that the Islamic terrorist killed a man and a woman in the attack.
He confirmed Khan had a prior terrorism conviction and had been jailed for eight years in 2012.
He was released on license in December 2018 and was still wearing a monitoring tag.
Islamic terrorist Usman Khan
Commissioner Basu confirmed Khan had been attending a seminar to help offenders reintegrate into society following their release from jail.
The killer had previously been arrested on December 20, 2010, four days before he and his nine-strong Al-Qaeda-inspired gang had planned to plant a bomb in the toilets of the London Stock Exchange.
Khan’s Islamic gang in London
Police found a handwritten list of targets which included the U.S. Embassy and the homes of London Mayor Boris Johnson, the Dean of St Paul’s Cathedral and two rabbis.
The gang also carried out surveillance of other possible targets including Big Ben, Westminster Abbey, the Palace of Westminster and the London Eye.
The group planned to send five bombs in the post to London synagogues.
Their plot was foiled after the security services bugging their homes and cars heard discussions of a ‘Mumbai’ atrocity on the streets of Britain, mirroring the 2008 attack in India.
The United Kingdom has a legislation compatible with its English Christian culture and civilization. It is completely incompatible to deal with Muslims from violent Third World Islamic nations.
In its new reality, the United Kingdom, which in the past was harsh with Nazis, should understand that it can be no less harsh with Muslim criminals. The history itself of Khan, involving terrorism, shows that he deserved no less than the death penalty. When it was not applied to him and his associate terrorists, the result was eventually freedom for him to kill innocent people.
When terrorists and other murderers are not condemned to death, innocent people are condemned to death by their hands.
Yet, it is a hard time for London to punish Muslim terrorists the way they deserve. Even though the United Kingdom has not a Muslim majority, London has fallen: its mayor is a Muslim.
The United Kingdom, which did not surrender to Nazis, has surrendered to the “religion of peace,” and the result of this surrender is that the British people has no peace anymore.
With information from DailyMail
Recommended Reading:

Tuesday, November 19, 2019

What You Don’t Know about Homosexual Activism in Brazil’s Bolsonaro Administration


What You Don’t Know about Homosexual Activism in Brazil’s Bolsonaro Administration

By Julio Severo
In an interview with the Brazilian newspaper Gazeta do Povo, a homosexual activist has revealed that while the administration of the Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro is seen as a staunch opponent of the gay agenda, it is behind the scenes advancing that agenda.
Marina Reidel, who was born biologically as a man, but today identifies himself as a “woman,” is not just any homosexual activist. He, who now forces everyone to treat him as “she” — under threat of using the arm of law and government, as he has received government assistance to “erase” his male identity record and forge a “female” identity —, holds an important post in the Bolsonaro administration.
Reidel leads the Directorship for the Promotion of Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transvestite and Transgender Rights, which operates at Minister Damares Alves’ Ministry of Women, Family and Human Rights (MWFHR). In fact, he has led this office since he was sworn in by the former socialist government in 2016.
Although she fights gender ideology and has been criticized for her conservative views, the minister promised when being inaugurated in the MWFHR that, if needed, she would be “on the streets with transvestites, at school doors, with children who are discriminated against for their sexual orientation.”
It is a disconcerting defense to conservative Brazil, which cannot understand how a child can have a sexual identity based on the fictitious term “sexual orientation.” A child is only driven to homosexual behavior by sexual abuse and brainwashing. But instead of addressing the roots of homosexuality in children, does the minister propose to combat forces of social resistance to the homosexualization of children?
Such an attitude is in line with Marina Reidel, who said he wants his performance in the Bolsonaro administration to reach “that gay boy or that lesbian or transgender girl in the Brazil countryside who doesn’t even know he or she has access to a range of public policies.”
Reidel believes that children are born homosexual. And by retaining a gay activist with this vision, who has the full support of a minister who seems to have the same vision, the Bolsonaro administration shoots itself in the foot and the foot of millions of conservative voters.
Children are vulnerable to negative transformations due to trends, fads and abuse. They are curious by nature and can change under strange influences if there are no necessary protections from parents and other guardians.
Reidel, who used to be a male teacher, says that when he became a “female” teacher, the true female teachers made disapproving glances while students were curious, because they did not understand the implications of this. Reidel says of the intense curiosity of the students: “For many days, I couldn’t teach, I spent the whole period answering their questions. They wanted to know everything.”
In the homosexualist view, female teachers’ disapproving behavior fits in with “bullying.” Attempting to prevent students from being exposed to bad influence also fits in with “bullying.” And what if a confused student started to be interested in the male teacher’s change into “female” teacher and his mother and father disagreed? “Bullying.”
In his activism, Reidel has a special focus on children. The conservative public might say that this activist’s presence and his activism make the Bolsonaro administration look just like the former socialist administration in Brazil. In fact, Reidel has been on the same Directorship for the Promotion of Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transvestite and Transgender Rights since 2016. What the Bolsonaro administration has done is not to terminate this office or the post of Reidel, who continues to do today the same things that he was already doing in the socialist administration.
Reidel said,
“Interestingly, we were already from another administration, but the whole board was maintained, and the proposals we were producing were also maintained. There was also respect from the minister, from the people who came here, to understand what we were doing, to accept and continue. At no time they said ‘we don’t want that.’ There was a respect for our technical production and all the work done so far.”
Gay activist Reidel himself confessed that the entire gay agenda that was being promoted by the former socialist administration continues to be promoted under the Bolsonaro administration. There was no change. There was no stopping. The difference is that while every homosexualist campaign in the socialist administration was carried out with fanfare, in the Bolsonaro administration everything is done without fanfare.
For loathing the right, the left makes many accusations against the Bolsonaro administration. Obviously, the left is not accusing the Bolsonaro administration of promoting the gay agenda. Rather, it is using the lack of fanfare to accuse the Bolsonaro administration of “homophobic.”
Is a right that promotes without fanfare the same gay agenda that the left promotes with fanfare compatible with Christian values?
Reidel added that his Bolsonaro administration office is receiving assistance from notorious homosexualist globalists around the world. He said: “We have also created a working group with people from the ministry and guests from other institutions such as the UN, the Public Prosecutor’s Office, the European Union.”
“We have a project to improve the handling of complaints in this area by dialing the reporting hotline 100,” Reidel added, referring to the special telephone number for anonymous reporting of “bullying” and “homophobia.”
Reidel revealed in the interview that one of his office’s main goals is to partner with churches, enlisting them to combat “bullying” and “homophobia” against homosexuals. He said,
“We are thinking about some issues that are important in the fight against violence and one of them is working on what we call ‘human rights bilateral dialogues’ where one of the themes is ‘Christians and LGBTs.’ Because we want to create a dialogue with churches over the dilemmas of violence and tolerance.”
Conservative Christians and I can be persecuted by anti-prejudice laws for calling Reidel “he,” because the Brazilian law favoring gay activism treats them the way they want, while we can’t treat them the way they were born biologically. Our “not accepting” of their attitude of not accepting their biological reality is considered “bullying” and “homophobia.”
Transvestites engage in prostitution, violence and drug trafficking. The church can and should receive them so that they may have an opportunity for salvation and transformation. But the church being required by law to receive and treat them according to their fantasies of sin and depravity would be government committing violence and rape. The same is true of private companies — including Christian schools — which should not be required by law to hire individuals whom their owners interpret as a bad influence on the workplace.
This madness will not stop there. If a child gets confused by men disguised as “women,” will the government treat as “bullying” parents’ efforts to keep the child away from these men and their influence?
If a theological college accepts the enrollment of a “woman” and then finds out that “she” is he, will the college be prosecuted for “bullying” and “homophobia” if it later rejects his enrollment?
The government-backed disfigurement of sexual identity goes against the laws of nature and the laws of God.
The Huff Post Brazil website said in 2018:
“On April 6, 2018, Marina Reidel took in her hands the symbol of an achievement: a new birth certificate, which reads ‘gender: female.’ The right to have the name and gender changed in the document, obtained by court order, it is just one of many achievements of this teacher who shared her transsexuality in the classroom, before the curious eyes of students and recriminating eyes of colleagues.”
The Huff Post Brazil, which is one of Brazil’s largest leftist websites, honored gay activist Marina Reidel as “woman” in 2018. By accepting this activist as a tax-paid official, the Bolsonaro administration also recognizes him as “woman,” eventually condemning those who “reproach” this identity aberration and strengthening the profiteers of child curiosity.
It is curiosity that makes a child ask, ask and ask. If curiosity is answered responsibly and with solid values, the result will be psychologically healthy for the child. But if no one can help the child by intervening so that the homosexuality of a male teacher who sees himself as a “female” teacher may not affect the child, for fear that his help will be legally attacked as “bullying” and “homophobia,” we are already living in a social climate of dictatorship, where a minority — individuals who practice homosexuality make up less than 2 percent of the population and many are in the prison population — dictates to the majority.
The child’s curiosity may result in the homosexual seizing the opportunity for homosexual grooming and indoctrination, while teachers and parents who try to prevent grooming, indoctrination and recruitment are relentlessly accused of “bigots” and sources of “bullying” and “homophobia.” The clear message from the leftist media and the government is that curiosity must be free to move forward — only in the direction wished by gay activism.
If it was already a nightmare to see the former socialist administration in Brazil promoting the gay agenda, the biggest nightmare is to see the Bolsonaro administration, elected to reverse the socialist nightmare, continuing what socialists were already doing.
While many may blame the minister exclusively for what is happening, the truth is that in a story on the homosexual website Observatory G, the minister herself acknowledged that the order for this gay breakthrough came from Bolsonaro himself. She said,
“We recognize violence against the community and we have to face it. And President Bolsonaro gave orders to this minister for us to confront violence against the LGBT community. It exists and should be addressed. But this administration comes with a proposal to confront all segments and our ministry has a specific board of directors dedicated to the LGBT community. We are going to make this confrontation with a lot of courage. Without fear.”
“To confront violence against the LGBT community” is the flagship of homosexual strategies to advance their agenda. It is the supreme gay Trojan horse. This is the default method of the left to advance its agenda.
In Brazil, there are over 60,000 murders a year and, according to homosexual groups, only 400 homosexuals are murdered a year, often in situations involving dangerous scenarios such as prostitution and drugs. But 400 is less than 1 percent of 60,000. Only socialists have the peculiar concern of prioritizing a minority to the detriment of the majority. So why has Bolsonaro embraced this kind of concern?
The attitude of maintaining a militant homosexual of gender ideology in the Bolsonaro administration goes against Bolsonaro himself, who said in the March for Jesus in Brasilia in 2018:
“There is no such thing as gender ideology. This is devil thing. We do not discriminate against anyone. We have no prejudice. Laws exist to defend majorities. Minorities that do no harm to anyone will be happy.”
He said this before crowds of evangelical pastors.
Isn’t it contradictory to see gender ideology as a devil thing and to keep a homosexual activist who focuses on that ideology and children in government?
Why does Bolsonaro keep in his administration a gay activist actively involved in the devil thing?
Also, why does the Bolsonaro administration want dialogue and partnership with churches to advance this devil thing? It is true that some churches followed the follies of the former socialist administration. Will there now be repetition of the error with churches following the follies of the Bolsonaro administration?
It is unfortunate that the Bolsonaro administration, which is seen as a conservative administration, is behind the scenes acting against conservatism.
Damares Alves’s mission, as a Pentecostal minister or simply an evangelical in government office, is to represent the evangelical church as a transforming force in government, not a government representative to transform churches according to government plans.
The Bible teaches that “cursed is the man who trusts in man.” The curse increases when people trust the collective man — the government — whether left-wing or right-wing.
Alves, as a Pentecostal minister, should oppose the Bolsonaro administration’s efforts to continue the homosexualist policies of the former socialist administration. Her lack of resistance opens opportunities for enemies to accuse. There is a campaign on WhatsApp and the internet in general against the minister for alleged “socialist collusion.” This campaign refuses to see that “capitulation to socialism” is not an isolated problem, but broad problem in the Bolsonaro administration, which visited China in the 70th celebration of the communist revolution that killed millions of Chinese. In fact, Bolsonaro called China a “capitalist country.” Following this reasoning, who will be surprised if Bolsonaro says gay rights are human rights sooner or later?
“Woe to the world because of offenses! For offenses must come, but woe to that man by whom the offense comes! If your hand or foot causes you to sin, cut it off and cast it from you. It is better for you to enter into life lame or maimed, rather than having two hands or two feet, to be cast into the everlasting fire. And if your eye causes you to sin, pluck it out and cast it from you. It is better for you to enter into life with one eye, rather than having two eyes, to be cast into hell fire.” (Matthew 18:7-9 NKJV)
If I were in the place of the minister, I would oppose homosexual efforts to promote, entice, indoctrinate, and recruit through the Bolsonaro government, or I would resign to dedicate myself solely to proclaim the Gospel of the Kingdom of God.
With information from Gazeta do Povo and Huff Post Brasil.
Recommended Reading:

Sunday, November 17, 2019

Billy Graham and The Forgotten Factor in the Overthrow of Soviet Communism


Billy Graham and The Forgotten Factor in the Overthrow of Soviet Communism

By Julio Severo
As an American tourist in the former Soviet Union, Billy Graham prayed in a Moscow empty stadium in 1959. He prayed for God to open the doors for the Gospel to be preached in that nation.
Billy Graham preaching in Moscow in 1992
The answer came decades later. Before and after the fall of the Soviet empire, Billy Graham had the unique opportunity to preach the Gospel to the Soviet people and leaders. Before the fall of the Soviet Union, critics interpreted his evangelistic trips to Moscow as an American being a naïve pawn in the hands of Soviet communists. What critics did not know was that before the trips, Graham took advise with his Republican conservative friends, including Ronald Reagan.
Billy Graham in a Moscow stadium in 1959
A Republican conservative president told him, “The message you have is more important than the criticism you will get.” Being criticized, Graham preached the Gospel in Moscow. He said that he knew that they would be using him, but that this was also an opportunity for him to use them to share the Gospel with them, including Soviet political and military leaders.
After the fall of the Soviet empire, Graham preached in a Moscow stadium to 50,000 Russians in 1992 and God’s action was so fantastic that the choir singing “The Battle Hymn of Republic” (Glory, Glory, Hallelujah! His truth is marching on) was the Red Army itself. Several red soldiers in the choir went forward to receive Christ after Graham gave the invitation.
Red Army soldiers singing Glory Hallelujah in a Billy Graham Crusade in Moscow in 1992
Left-wing historians rule out the Gospel as a factor in the overthrow of the Soviet Union. Yet, conservative historians are not immune to misrepresentations.
I have all the anticommunist books by Paul Kengor, a Catholic author who writes extensively about Soviet communism from the Catholic standpoint.
Even though Billy Graham visited Russia several times before and after the Soviet Union, and Pope John Paul II never visited Russia, Kengor singularly extolled the pope as the most prominent Christian to defeat Soviet communism.
This representation goes against what Kengor said in his book “A Pope and a President” where he quoted President Ronald Reagan as saying at the National Religious Broadcasters in the early 1980s: “The most awesome military machine in history [the USSR]… is no match for that one, single man, hero, strong yet tender, Prince of Peace.”
Billy Graham preaching to 50,000 people in Moscow in 1992
The proclamation of the Gospel was so a powerful factor to defeat communism that, as Kengor recognized in his book, “Reagan unleashed VOA literally to spread the Word.” VOA is the Voice of America, the official radio of the U.S. government. VOA was used by Reagan not to spread Catholicism, but the Word of God.
There is no greater force against communism than the Gospel. And no one in the West preached more the Gospel in the Soviet Union than Billy Graham did.
Yet, the Gospel is no once mentioned in Kengor’s book “The Crusader,” where he chronicles Reagan’s battle against Soviet communism. Billy Graham, whom Kengor recognizes as a close Reagan friend, is marginally mentioned in Kengor’s books. On the other hand, Pope John Paul II is extensively mentioned.
The only antidote against communism and socialism is not the right. There are right-wing groups, like the Moonies, who follow the false messiah Rev. Moon, which brainwash their followers.
The only antidote against communism and socialism is not Catholicism. Catholic Latin America is filled with socialism and communism, thanks to the Liberation Theology preached by Catholic leaders. This is the reason that the more Catholic is a Latin American nation, the more prone to socialism it is. Venezuela is massively Catholic — 97 percent of its population. Cuba is also massively Catholic.
The only antidote against communism and socialism is the Gospel. This is the reason the more evangelical is a nation, the more prone it is to oppose socialism. Guatemala, which has now become 50 percent evangelical, is not so prone to socialism as Catholic Venezuela is. This is the reason that the main political base of Bolsonaro in Brazil against socialism was evangelicals, even though he has been empowering right-wing groups that brainwash people. Brazil, which was some decades ago so massively Catholic as Venezuela and Cuba, now has become about 30 percent evangelical.
It is not coincidence also that the most anticommunist president in the U.S. history — Ronald Reagan — was supported by evangelicals and was a Protestant himself. In fact, Reagan proclaimed 1983 as Year of the Bible in the United States.
The basic difference is that in Catholic churches the Gospel is not so prominently preached as it is in evangelical churches. This is the secret against communism: The proclamation of the Gospel.
When the Gospel begins to be effectively proclaimed in the Catholic churches in Venezuela, Liberation Theology will die away and socialism will disappear.
Yet, if the Catholic Church in Venezuela and other Latin American nations do not begin to preach the Gospel, evangelical churches will increase and emerge as the main force against communism by merely preaching the Gospel.
There is no greater conservative and anticommunist force in the universe than the Gospel of Jesus Christ. All the other “antidotes” fail and brainwash people, but only the Gospel transforms, delivers, heals and saves people.
Information and pictures about Billy Graham Crusade in Moscow were taken from the movie “Billy Graham: God’s Ambassador.”
Recommended Reading:

Saturday, November 16, 2019

Pope Compares Politicians Opposed to Gays, Jews To Hitler


Pope Compares Politicians Opposed to Gays, Jews To Hitler

By Julio Severo
Pope Francis denounced the persecution of homosexuals on November 15, 2019, and compared politicians who “stoke hatred and anti-gay sentiment” to Hitler.
Francis delivered his remarks at an international conference on criminal law at the Vatican City.
“It is not coincidental that at times there is a resurgence of symbols typical of Nazism,” he said. “And I must confess to you that when I hear a speech (by) someone responsible for order or for a government, I think of speeches by Hitler in 1934, 1936.”
He said persecution against Jews and “people with homosexual tendencies” represented a “culture that throws people away.”
“These are actions that are typical of Nazism, which with its persecution of Jews, Gypsies, people with homosexual orientation, represent an excellent model of the culture of hatred that throws people away. That is what was done in those days and today it is happening again,” Francis said.
He did not single out any particular politician or government.
There are two categories of governments and societies as far as homosexuality is concerned. There are governments and societies that torture and kill homosexuals. Even though Islamic nations as Saudi Arabia and Iran are prominent examples, the reality is that in a lesser or bigger degree all Islamic societies tend to persecute and kill homosexuals.
And there are governments and societies that do not torture and kill homosexuals.
Yet, Francis did not address Islamic nations that kill homosexuals. He seems to imply that politicians, probably Christian politicians in the United States, who fight against the gay agenda are imitating Nazism.
His implication has nothing to do with U.S. President Donald Trump, whose administration has made virtually no effort to oppose gay “marriage” and other major items from the homosexual agenda. Generally, the Trump administration is passive regarding homosexual advances in the U.S. society.
Pope’s accusation seems to have targeted evangelical politicians. But his effort to make opposition to homosexuality equal to opposition to Jews is futile in the American context, because U.S. evangelicals are shining examples of defense of family against the homosexual agenda and defense of Israel and the Jews against left-wing and Islamic persecution. No one in the whole world defends more Israel and the Jews than American evangelicals do.
However, there is a massive group that fits perfectly in the pope’s description: Muslims. Usually, Muslim cultures oppose homosexuals and Jews, and not rarely they kill homosexuals and Jews — not mentioning Christians.
Because Pope Francis did not specify his accusation by naming Muslims as imitators of Nazism — and by the way, the Hitler autobiography is a best-seller in Islamic nations —, the public may feel in the dark about his real target.
Nazism persecuted the Jews totally, but it did not persecute homosexuals totally. According to Dr. Lothar Machtan in his book “The Hidden Hitler,” Hitler was a homosexual. And according to Scott Lively in his book “The Pink Swastika,” the Nazi elite was homosexual. Because the predominant Nazi homosexuality was “macho,” they hated and persecuted effeminate homosexuals.
Even today, there are hostility between homosexual groups.
That Hitler was a homosexual was not a total secret. Left-wing Jews in Germany tried to expose Hitler’s homosexuality in the 1930s, but the German society gave them no attention because they were Jews and left-wingers — two categories hated by Nazis.
If Francis is really a left-wing Catholic who likes the Jews, could not he give some attention to these left-wing Jews?
If a group kills effeminate homosexuals, it is similar to Nazis. This is not the case of evangelical politicians, but it is the case of Muslims.
If a group of homosexuals imposes a fascist ideology on society, it is similar to Nazis.
Hitler’s Nazi regime in Germany persecuted and killed millions of Jews, from 1933-45, and had an elaborate array of death camps, which were copied from what Catholic Spain, a champion of the Inquisition, did to Catholic Cuba in the late 1800s.
Who admires Hitler for what he did to the Jews? Muslims, not American evangelicals.
Why didn’t Francis target Muslims? Is he afraid of them?
In its report about Francis, FoxNews, which is considered the largest conservative news TV in the U.S., also did not mention Muslims. It just said, “leaders such as President Jair Bolsonaro of Brazil have a history of making homophobic and racists comments.” FoxNews is so “conservative” that Bolsonaro chose it exclusively for interview in his U.S. trip on March 2019.
DailyMail also only mentioned Bolsonaro as an example of what Francis said, and it had no courage to mention Saudi Arabia and other Muslim nations that kill homosexuals.
Even though Bolsonaro has said in the past that homosexuality in a son can be “healed” through spanking, as a president he has not voiced such ideas anymore. On the contrary, in the 2019 Brazilian CPAC, his son Eduardo Bolsonaro proudly posed with the gay flag, and his father never criticized him for it.
To insinuate that U.S. evangelicals are “stoking hatred and anti-gay sentiment” with their necessary campaigns against homosexual indoctrination in schools and TV, while the pope totally spares homosexual-killing Muslims, is insane.
To insinuate that U.S. evangelicals are “stoking hatred and anti-gay sentiment” with their necessary campaigns against the fascist homosexual ideology, while the pope totally spares homosexual-killing Muslims, is insane.
To compare pro-Israel and pro-family evangelicals in the U.S. to Hitler is similarly insane.
Francis owes a public apology to U.S. evangelicals.
If Francis does not want to criticize Muslims for killing Jews and homosexuals, he should at least condemn problems inside the Catholic Church. He should condemn the resurgence of pro-Inquisition sentiment among right-wing Catholics in Brazil. The revisionism of the Inquisition is similar to the revisionism of abortion, and this is a Catholic problem that should be addressed by the pope. Sooner or later, pro-Inquisition Catholics are going to want to kill homosexuals.
Pro-Inquisition sentiment is similar to pro-Nazi sentiment. Francis should focus on this problem, because pro-Inquisition right-wing syncretic Catholics in Brazil are connected with Steve Bannon to overthrow his papacy. They want a pro-Inquisition pope.
Olavo de Carvalho, a syncretic Catholic who is the most prominent Brazilian revisionist of the Inquisition, is connected with Bannon against Francis. Carvalho does not accept the Christian teaching about the homosexual behavior being a sin. So why does Francis target U.S. evangelicals, but he does not target pro-Inquisition right-wing syncretic Catholics?
The pope needs better advisers to understand homosexuality in Nazism and Hitler, and to understand that evangelical politicians in the United States defend Israel and the Jews and the family against the homosexualist threats without killing homosexuals.
With information from FoxNews and DailyMail.
Recommended Reading on Francis:
Recommended Reading on Nazism:
Recommended Reading on Abortion and the Inquisition: