Pedophilia By Any Other Name is Still Homosexuality

Paul Cameron, Ph.D., Kay Proctor, M.Ed., & Kirk Cameron, Ph.D.

As scientists, we are concerned about recent discussions regarding clergy sexual abuse. Numerous authors, like a recent Chilean post by Riccardo Cascioli (February 8, 2018), seem to believe there is a significant difference between ‘pedophiles’ and homosexuals.

Indeed, Riccardo Cascioli re-makes a point often made: “the so-called ‘pedophilia cases’ are actually an overwhelming majority of incidents of homosexuality”[1] where

“pedophilia properly refers to the attraction of adults for pre-pubescent children. When such attraction is directed towards teenagers, one must instead speak of ephebophilia which is initiated by homosexual persons. This is what we are talking about in Chile, but it also is true for at least 80% of the cases which erroneously reported in the news as cases of pedophilia in the Catholic Church. This is at least the conclusion which emerges from the reports of John Jay College on the cases of abuse registered in the Catholic Church in the United States.… [These facts allow] us to say clearly that the problem in the Catholic Church is not pedophilia but homosexuality.” 

While we heartily agree that the problem is one of homosexuality, we would make five points:

1.      ‘Pedophilia’ is not an exclusive orientation.

The definition of ‘pedophilia’ as used by American psychiatrists focuses on the client and does not assume his sexual interests lay solely with children. Laymen, on the other hand, tend to use the term as an exclusive preference. In the American Psychiatric Association (APA) Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM IV, 2000), a ‘pedophile’ is an adult who has,

“over a period of at least 6 months, recurrent, intense sexually arousing fantasies, sexual urges, or behaviors involving sexual activities with a prepubescent child or children (generally age 13 years or younger). B. The person has acted on these urges, or the sexual urges or fantasies cause marked distress or interpersonal difficulty.”

The John Jay reports do not provide enough information to determine how many perpetrators only had sex with children under the age of 13. In 1970, the Kinsey Institute[2] surveyed 671 randomly-selected gay males regarding the proportions of their homosexual “partners” who “were 16 or younger when you were 21 or older” (i.e., at least 5 years below the age of consent in California at the time of interview). Among the respondents, 77% said “none,” 23% said “half or less,” and no one said “more than half.” Thus, none claimed to be ‘pedophiles’ in the laymen’s sense, yet 23% admitted to having sex with boys.

In Alfred Kinsey’s original survey, 27% of 646 homosexual men and 2% of 222 homosexual women reported having homosexual sex with at least one partner aged 15 or under, and 10.2% of gays but no lesbians to having sex with children under the age of 13.[3]

2.      Many, probably most, child molesters victimize a range of ages, and may also engage sexually with adults.

Both the John Jay reports and our systematic compilation of news stories captured by Google News (2011-2015) indicate that about half of the sexual abuse victims of clergy were 12 and under. Table 1 is a partial summary of our data for news stories about religiously-affiliated perpetrators in which the age of the victim(s) was reported, compared against the John Jay results. In the Google News reports, 28 Catholic clergy perpetrators included at least some boy victims under the age of 13, while 24 perpetrators only victimized boys aged 13 and above. Note that homosexual child molesters accounted for the bulk of both perpetrators and victims, and heterosexual molesters more frequently abused older victims. The last two columns of Table 1 include results from all clergy-related news stories, including those which did not report victims’ ages.

Table 1. clergy and religiously-affiliated Google News Stories, USA (2011-15)

Clergy Type	Homosexual Perps (N)		Heterosexual Perps (N)		% Perps Who Abused Homosexually	% Victimized by Homo Perps
Victim Ages	Some or all less than13 yrs	All 13+ yrs	Some or all less than 13 yrs	All 13+ yrs
Catholic	28	24	3	7	84%	98%
Protestant	20	10	16	23	43%	64%
Jewish	3	1
Mormon	2	1	2
John Jay Catholic Priest Study	Victims aged less than 10 = 1259; Aged 10-12 = 2970 (47% of same-sex victims)	Victims aged 13-17 = 4727 (53% of same-sex victims)			78%	84%

It is unknown how many perpetrators who molested kids aged 12 and under would have preferred all of them to be pre-teens; time and opportunity play large roles in who gets molested. For example, teachers who were caught almost always stuck to the age of those in their classroom. All we know is what was reported about the age of victims at the time the perpetrator made the news, not his mental state.

Importantly, anyone trying to differentiate the sexual preferences or ‘orientations’ of those who molest pre-teens (less than 13) vs. teenagers (more than 13) must account for the testimonies of molested boys. These usually indicate that the sexual contacts lasted a few (2-5) years. So, if a boy is listed as 14 in a news report, he may have recently been molested, but more likely his molestation began when he was between 10 to 12. Thus, when Fr. James Talbot of Freeport Maine was listed as having 17 victims aged 9 to 17, we know some, and perhaps all, of the boys were first recruited as pre-teens.

It is also noteworthy that those who engage in homosexuality may also have sex with the opposite sex. Perhaps 10-20% exclusively have sex with their own sex. Further, those who engage homosexually with adults may also engage in sex with children.

3.      The corrosive influence of homosexuals in positions of authority was well known generations ago.

Three generations ago, in 1950, U.S. government officials testified before Congress that

“Most of the authorities agree and our investigation [which included psychiatric testimony] has shown that the presence of a sex pervert in a Government agency tends to have a corrosive influence on his fellow employees. These perverts will frequently attempt to entice normal individuals to engage in perverted practices. This is particularly true in the case of young and impressionable people who might come under the influence of a pervert.

“Government officials have the responsibility of keeping this type of corrosive influence out of the agencies under their control. It is particularly important that the thousands of young men and women who are brought into Federal jobs not be subjected to that type of influence while in the service of the Government. One homosexual can pollute a Government office.”[4]

That same year, the U.S. Subcommittee on Investigations of the Senate Committee on Expenditures in the Executive Departments concluded “that homosexuals were not qualified for federal employment and that they represented a security risk because they could be blackmailed about their sexuality. In response to this report, President Eisenhower issued an executive order dismissing all homosexuals from federal employment,...”[5]

4.      The Christian Church historically condemned all forms of homosexual child sexual abuse.

While the Old Testament condemned homosexuality, it only obliquely mentioned the predilections of homosexuals toward youth, referring to boy prostitutes. The Christian Church amplified this by explicitly condemning the homosexual seduction of boys. At that time, the Jewish standard for adulthood was age 13 for males, which approximated the sign of adulthood in the Roman world, when boys donned the tunic (14-15 years old). So the Catholic Church probably regarded ‘corruption of boys’ as seduction or attempted recruitment before the age of about 15. Further, there is no evidence that the Catholic Church distinguished between pre-teens and teenagers — sodomy is just as painful and injurious in either case.

5.      ‘Mental healthism’ is not the answer.

Making a distinction between pre-teens (less than 13) and teenagers (more than 13) — a distinction apparently irrelevant to homosexual molesters and past investigators — does nothing to protect boys. Let the mental health ‘experts’ argue about whether raping boys of this or that age indicates a different ‘orientation’ — it is still male-on-male homosexuality. Calling a skunk by a different name does not make it stink any less. And is either worse, abusing a pre-teen or a teenager? The Catholic Church should not defer to those who would parse the homosexual nature of these sexual crimes into a narrow slice, as if somehow a fundamentally different ‘thing’ depending on the victim’s age.

Almost all the American school shooters have been under treatment by these experts. Yet, laymen diagnosed the Valentine’s Day Florida shooter as a clear and present danger, while mental health experts took pains to keep sharp objects (but not guns!) away from him lest he harm himself or family. They apparently believed Nicolas Cruz could be contained by talking to one of their number (i.e., ‘therapy’). But the treatment outcomes for drug or alcohol addiction are as dismal with or without a mental health expert on the team. And rare is the priest who has not re-offended after ‘treatment’ by these selfsame experts.

Likewise, their client-centered, rather than society-protecting perspective, has little place in the Catholic Church. The Catholic Church has an obligation to protect boys (pre-teens, teenagers, etc.) from assault. Eliminating homosexuals from positions of authority is the best way to achieve this, not by adopting psychiatric argot in a bid to appear ‘sophisticated.’

References:

[1] Cascioli, R. (2018) “In the Church, The Problem is not Pedophilia but Homosexuality,” February 8, 2018, https://onepeterfive.com/church-problem-not-pedophilia-homosexuality/

[2] Bell, A. P. & Weinberg, M. S. (1978) Homosexualities: a study of diversity among men and women. New York: Simon & Schuster.

[3] Gebhard, P.H. & Johnson, A.B. (1979) The Kinsey data: marginal tabulations of the 1938-1963 interviews conducted by the institute for sex research. Philadelphia: WB Saunders.

[4] “Employment of Homosexuals and Other Sex Perverts in Government,” S Rep No 81-241, 81st Congress, 2d Session (1950) at 4.

[5] Graham, R., et al. (2011) The health of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender people. National Academy Press. Section 2, p. 9.

Portuguese version of this article: Pedofilia por qualquer outro nome é ainda homossexualidade

Source: Last Days Watchman

Recommended Reading:

Exposing Pedophilia Scandals and Hiding Homosexual Scandals in the Catholic Church

Reading the Far Left and Its Attack on Breitbart and BarbWire: Gay Perversion, Veiled and Overt

By Julio Severo

Breitbart and BarbWire have been accused of being “homophobic.” I know what is this because I am not strange to such attacks. Between The Lines News, a gay publication in Michigan, made a selection last week (in its printed and online publication): “Creep of the Week: Julio Severo.” (Originally published in its printed version 6/15/2017, Issue 2524, Between The Lines News.)

Its reason for naming Julio Severo a “creep”? Between The Lines News said,

“In a June 12 piece on Barbwire, a website named for its unique ability to make a thinking person’s brain bleed, Severo writes, ‘The homosexual movement became active in Brazil by direct cultural effect from America, including her politics and Hollywood.’”

The U.S. homosexual Facebook page “Pride USA” also posted: “Creep of the Week: Julio Severo.” (Link: http://archive.is/LEI72)

If the accusation from Between The Lines News is local and reaches only people in Michigan, other U.S. homosexual activists have made sure that Julio Severo and other “far right-wingers” may not escape national and international attention.

In an article titled “Reading the Far Right: Homophobia, Veiled and Overt,” The Advocate focused on Breitbart and BarbWire and their columnists. Breitbart and BarbWire are websites prominent among U.S. conservatives.

The Advocate is the biggest gay magazine in America and is, in its own words, “The World’s Leading News Source for LGBT.”

Is there a “homophobic” far-right movement in the United States? According to The Advocate, Breitbart and BarbWire are two examples of American far-right extremism.

The problem The Advocate sees in Breitbart:

“Breitbart, which claims not to embrace homophobia (that claim is questionable, and it certainly is full of transphobia), is basically making the argument that the LGBT rights movement used to be OK but has descended into left-wing insanity.”

The Advocate also said:

“The conversion of the Los Angeles Gay Pride march into the anti-Trump ‘#ResistMarch’ on Sunday marked the effective end of the gay rights movement,” wrote Breitbart senior editor at large Joel B. Pollak. “Once, the gay rights movement stood for tolerance: hence the rainbow flag, which is a symbol not only of pride but also of acceptance. But the message on Sunday was that lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and queer (LGBTQ) conservatives are unwelcome in that spectrum — and are, in fact, aiding the enemy.”

Pollak contended that the movement has changed “from a force for liberation into a tool for repression.”

Breitbart’s stance defending supposedly “conservative” homosexuals who are not welcome in the homosexual movement is not conservative or even Christian. Even so, The Advocate managed to find “lots of overt homophobia” in its “reading of the far-right media” — Breitbart!

The Advocate has a hard time accusing Breitbart of being “far right,” if this means “far conservative,” because one of Breitbart’s former editors, Milo Yiannopoulos, is openly homosexual.

Breitbart would have a hard time to label itself conservative, because genuine U.S. conservatism, especially evangelical conservatism (which is the most prevalent Christian conservatism in America), sees nothing conservative in homosexuality.

Breitbart’s idea that the LGBT rights movement used to be OK is nonsense. Since the days of Alfred Kinsey, who had malicious intent and helped the homosexual movement more than 60 years ago with his malicious sex “studies” (and his “ten percent population is homosexual” hoax, debunked by Dr. Judith Reisman), malicious intent is an integral part of the gay agenda’s history. So Breitbart is terribly mistaken on his view of homosexuality.

What is The Advocate’s problem with BarbWire?

The Advocate said:

“For a look at homophobic and transphobic religious right ideology, one has to go no further than BarbWire, which purports to offer a biblical worldview. It carried a column last week by Robert Oscar Lopez, pulling out the old canard that LGBT people are out to ‘recruit’ children.”

The Advocate is right about BarbWire offering a biblical worldview. Without such worldview, there is no real conservatism. And, yes, the homosexual movement is always preying on children. Or did we forget how revolted they are when parents try to protect their own children from predatory homosexuality?

In 2013, Russia approved a law banning homosexual propaganda to children and adolescents. Hell (Obama and his wicked State Department) was unleashed on Russia. There was a massive revolt from homosexual activists in the U.S. and Europe. Their revolt made appear that Russia had approved capital punishment for homosexuals.

After the ban, The Advocate sarcastically announced that its 2014 Person of the Year was Vladimir Putin, seen by Patheos, an American atheist website, as “the horrifically homophobic president of Russia and a committed opponent of all things pro-LGBT.”

For homosexual activists in the U.S. and Europe, a ban on homosexual propaganda to children is akin to killing homosexuals! The homosexual movement cannot see itself away from children.

Even today, Putin is attacked just because of the ban. Last Sunday, one of the world’s largest Gay “Pride” Parades in São Paulo, Brazil, depicted mockingly Putin as a “drag queen.”

In 2014, when I participated in a pro-family event at the Kremlin, Moscow, the American participants were fearful because U.S. homosexual activists were pressuring the Obama’s State Department to investigate them over their participation in this event. After all, Russia was suffering sanctions from Obama and his left-wing administration.

Not much has changed. Trump’s State Department has increased the Obama sanctions against Russia and has recognized June as Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender and Intersex (LGBTI) Pride Month — continuing the tradition of Obama’s State Department.

The U.S. government has not changed in its defense of homosexual interests against Russia, which has kept its ban on homosexual propaganda to children.

What did Robert Oscar Lopez say that infuriated The Advocate? He said “that recruiting children into the LGBT identity, and then locking them into it, is fundamental to the LGBT community’s survival.”

A ban on such recruiting is fundamental, but the U.S. coercive homosexual tactics, including with government assistance, have relentlessly chastised Russia. With such attitude, the U.S. government shows clearly that it will never protect children from predatory homosexuality.

The Advocate also said:

“In another column published by BarbWire last week, theology professor John Barber (it’s not clear if he’s related to site founder Matt Barber) asserted that there’s no such thing as a gay Christian — even a gay person who refrains from acting on same-sex desires, he said, can’t be a real Christian, because Jesus would have taken those desires away. ‘Without the dominion of sin being broken, the picture of the gay Christian is equivalent to a unicorn sighting,’ Barber wrote.”

That concept is rejected even by some Christian denominations that don’t approve of same-sex relationships, such as the Roman Catholic Church and the Mormon Church, which say a gay, lesbian, or bisexual person can be faithful to the church’s doctrine by remaining celibate.

Pause. If the Catholic Church really believes this way, this certainly explains the massive numbers of homosexual Catholic priests abusing boys! The Advocate added:

It’s also certainly contrary to the experiences of those who identify as gay and Christian. And some mainline Christian denominations are far more accepting, with the Episcopal Church, Presbyterian Church (USA), Evangelical Lutheran Church in America, and more offering church marriages to same-sex couples.

Apparently, The Advocate ignores the word apostasy, which is guided by a wicked and sick worldview. The Advocate ignores that the author of apostasy and the acceptance of homosexuality among Christian churches is Satan and his demons. The Advocate also ignores that the Author of all condemnation of homosexuality in the Bible is not man. It is God.

I like very much BarbWire’s biblical worldview. Sadly, Breitbart has not such worldview.

The Advocate’s worldview? Its inspiration comes the same author that causes apostasy among Christian churches.

Also, The Advocate did not forget me. It said:

Oh, and yet another BarbWire contributor, Julio Severo, spent a recent column excoriating Secretary of State Rex Tillerson for recognizing June as LGBT Pride Month. And even though Trump hasn’t issued a proclamation for Pride Month or scheduled a reception for it (as Obama did every year of his presidency), Severo saw Trump as complicit in the dreaded “homosexual agenda.”

“The same homosexual principles that drove U.S. diplomacy under Obama now drive the U.S. diplomacy under Trump,” Severo wrote. “The only difference is that while Obama was vocal about these principles, Trump gives a tacit support, by allowing his own administration to speak for himself. If the saying ‘silence means assent’ is correct, Trump’s ‘silence’ is a message.”

Oh, and by “homosexual principles” he seems to mean the condemnation of anti-LGBT persecution around the world. “Obama used the U.S. government to lead the world, by his bad example, into accepting the homosexual lifestyle as normal,” Severo commented. “By tacit or explicit support, the Trump administration is leading the world in the same bad example.” Severo also gave credence to the hate-fueled stereotype that gay people prey on children.

If I condemned Obama’s State Department for its homosexual propaganda, why should I spare Trump’s State Department over the same propaganda?

Regarding a “stereotype that gay people prey on children,” gay “conservative” Milo Yiannopoulos lost his job as a Breitbart editor after his interests in pedophilia were exposed.

Homosexuals, even “conservative” homosexuals, have a special interest in children. Yiannopoulos has proved it.

If there were no connection between homosexuality and sex abuse of boys, the Catholic Church would have no scandal of homosexual priests abusing boys.

This is not the first time The Advocate attacks me. In 2011 The Advocate criticized me because I defended a child and her biological mother against a homosexual predator. You can read the whole story here: “World’s biggest gay magazine: no compassion and tolerance for a former lesbian and her daughter.”

Yet, what is The Advocate’s reason for depicting BarbWire and Breitbart as “far right”? Some 40 years ago a conservative publication hiring open homosexual Milo Yiannopoulos as an editor would be seen as far liberal and far left-wing.

The U.S. culture has changed and rotted so much that homosexualists have become excessively demanding. Forty years ago, you were labeled a leftist and homosexualist if you only supported gay “marriage” without subscribing to every other tenet of the homosexual gospel.

Today, if you subscribe to every homosexual tenet, including on “marriage” and adoption, but disagrees on coercive homosexual tactics, you are labeled “far right-winger,” “fascist” and “Nazi.” For The Advocate’s nasty worldview, if you do not support totally, in every point, the gay agenda, you are not friend. You are enemy. This reality is also applicable to Trump, who has let his State Department promote homosexual propaganda but he disagrees on coercive homosexual tactics. Trump has become an enemy not because he fights the gay agenda (which in fact he does not fight), but just because he has not satisfied all wishes from homosexualists and their agenda.

Even though Breitbart and Trump may hire thousands and thousands of copies of Milo Yiannopoulos, Peter Thiel and other “conservative” homosexuals, The Advocate and other far-left-wing activists will keep accusing them of “homophobic,” “far right-wing,” “fascist” and, of course, their favorite insulting label: “Nazi.”

By the way, according to German author and professor Lothar Machtan, in his book “The Hidden Hitler” (Basic Books, 2001), Adolf Hitler was a homosexual. In his book “The Pink Swastika” (Veritas Aeterna, 1995), author Scott Lively contends that many Nazi leaders were homosexual.

Hitler and his Nazi movement were what the U.S. homosexual movement is today. Oppressive, repressive and dictatorial. But they accuse real conservatives of what homosexualists are.

I disagree with Breitbart’s compromised stance against the gay agenda and I agree with BarbWire’s biblical stance, but if for The Advocate “far right” means radicalism against homosexuals and if BarbWire and Breitbart, which do not kill homosexuals or endorse their killing, are “far right,” what are Saudi Arabia and other Islamic nations that kill homosexuals?

If The Advocate is concerned about real radicalism against homosexuals, it should make a list of Islamic nations that kill homosexuals. It should pressure Trump and his State Department to do to Saudi Arabia and other Muslim nations that kill homosexuals just as what Obama’s State Department did to Russia and what Trump’s State Department does to Russia: sanctions, sanctions and more sanctions.

Yet, Obama had no such concern. Trump also has not. And what has The Advocate done? After condemning BarbWire and Breitbart, and sparing all Islamic nations, The Advocate condemned NRATV — the National Rifle Association’s online video channel — and other conservative channels for saying that a Muslim committed the worst terrorist attack on U.S. homosexuals — the mass shooting at Pulse gay nightclub in Orlando June 12, 2016.

If it was not a Muslim, who was? BarbWire and Breitbart? Julio Severo?

For The Advocate, is it impossible for Muslims to be responsible for terror attacks against homosexuals? In contrast, is it impossible for BarbWire and Breitbart not to be culprit of “homophobia”?

This is sheer insanity and hypocrisy: To condemn the innocent and spare the culprit!

Trump needs to understand what Obama did not understand: the intrinsically dishonest and Nazi nature of the homosexual movement.

He needs BarbWire’s worldview, not Breitbart’s worldview, guiding his administration. And he should stop his administration from doing what Obama did: to bully Russia over its ban on homosexual propaganda to children.

Putin is right. Russia is right. A ban on homosexual propaganda to children is necessary.

BarbWire and its conservative biblical worldview are right. A ban on recruiting children into the LGBT identity is fundamental.

Yet, while Russia under Putin has successfully implemented its ban on homosexual propaganda to children, the Trump administration and its State Department have given no room for implementing BarbWire’s conservative biblical worldview to ban recruiting children into the LGBT identity.

Trump needs BarbWire in his administration. If he embraces BarbWire and its biblical worldview, The Advocate will certainly name him Person of the Year.

Conservative Christians will name him Protector of Children forever!

Breitbart’s worldview, which embraces the illusion of a conservative homosexuality, is insufficient to defeat The Advocate’s far left-wing worldview and its veiled and overt gay perversion. But BarbWire’s worldview, which is biblical, not far right, is more than enough.

Portuguese version of this article: Entendendo a extrema esquerda e seu ataque contra o Breitbart e o BarbWire: a perversão gay, encoberta e pública

Source: Last Days Watchman

Recommended Reading:

Trump’s State Department Recognizes June as LGBTI Pride Month

Facebook, Censorship, Profanity, Name-Calling and Foul Language

Why Is Right Wing Watch, of People for the American Way, Worried about Julio Severo?

How to Help Julio Severo through the PayPal Account of the Jewish Institute for Global Awareness

The Advocate criticizes Julio Severo’s efforts to defend child and her mother against homosexual predator

The Advocate names Vladimir Putin Person of the Year

Pedophilia Advocacy Knocks Down Prominent “Conservative” Gay

Trump Continues Obama’s Homosexual Imperialism and Frustrates Christian Conservatives

Exposing Pedophilia Scandals and Hiding Homosexual Scandals in the Catholic Church

The Left-Winger, the Right-Winger and the Cake

Trump and Prophecies, and a New Model of National and World Leader