Left-wing Baptist theologian defends BLM against conservative evangelicals and says that pro-life and pro-family groups fit under Anti-Terrorism Law

By Julio Severo

In his August 18, 2020 article “Brazilian Fundamentalist Evangelicals Aim at Black Lives Matter” in his column in the left-wing website The Intercept, Brazilian black activist and Baptist theologian Ronilso Pacheco talks about “persecution against BLM” (Black Lives Matter) by conservative evangelicals, whom he accuses of “white supremacists.” And he says that “Like their U.S. counterparts, fundamentalists in Brazil are accusing the anti-racist movement of fighting for the end of the traditional family and burning Bibles.”

Ronilso Pacheco

He said that conservative evangelicals, whom he accused of being “racist” and “fundamentalist,” use “fallacious arguments and lies,” but he himself used such arguments. His article declares BLM not guilty of burning Bibles in a “protest,” saying that anonymous protestors did it. Even so, he spent some time explaining that the fact that protestors burned the U.S. flag and a Bible is not a problem. He told that there would be a problem if they had burned several Bibles…

Ronilso Pacheco

Even knowing that BLM founder Patrisse Cullors said “We are trained Marxists,” Pacheco refuses the see reality just as it is. For him, BLM, which provokes riots and loots, is not a violent hate group. For him, conservative evangelicals, who provoke no riots and loots, are a violent hate group.

According to Alex Newman in The New American, Cullors also revealed that she is consulting spiritual entities and allowing them to “work through” her. “I’m calling for spirituality to be deeply radical,” she said. “We’re not just having a social justice movement, this is a spiritual movement.”

“What they [BLM adherents] are describing is their adherence to the Yoruba religion of Ifa, to where they are summoning dead spirits,” said talk-show host and Christian attorney Abraham Hamilton.

The Yoruba were known for practicing human sacrifice in Africa until Christianity became more prevalent and abolished the sacrifices.

According to Howard University:

“What is significant about the Yoruba people is that they kept their religion hidden under the guise of Catholicism, or [traditional] Protestantism… Cuban Santeria; Haitian Vodun (voodoo); Brazilian Candomble; Trinidad and Tobago Shango are all Yoruba or Orisha based. All of these religions are African derived religions having different names in different countries. They combine beliefs from the Kabbalah and Yoruba speaking peoples of West/Central Africa, with elements of Catholicism or Anglicanism.”

So it is not wonder that BLM is able to disguise its African witchcraft under some Christian elements.

Yoruba, with its orishas (called demons in Christianity), has brought untold misery, suffering, poverty and prostitution (including homosexual) to Africa and Latin America through Santeria, voodoo and Candomble.

The religion of Yoruba, with its Orishas, is the religion most loved by Nigerian mafias involved in sex trafficking and slavery in Nigeria and Europe. These mafias invoke Orishas to protect their criminal business and threaten victims. But probably BLM and Ronilso Pacheco would not be interested in African blacks sexually enslaving black women and girls.

Pacheco’s inflammatory language demonizing conservative evangelicals and justifying BLM is what any Marxist would do. And he demonizes pro-lifers too.

Based on the case of a Brazilian 10-year-old girl raped by her uncle, Pacheco defends abortion by saying that it was “[the girl’s] desire to terminate her pregnancy,” in a bizarre contrast in which at the same time as leftists claimed that the girl was too young to understand what pregnancy is, they also claim that she understood that forced abortion was necessary, justifying capital punishment for the baby who was a rape victim, but no capital punishment for the rapist.

In his article entitled “Pro-life and pro-family groups are hate groups that use the Bible as an alibi,” published on the Brazilian website UOL, Pacheco, who is a Baptist minister, expressed concern about “the extent and mobilization of the pro-life and pro -family movement.”

Among other far-left-wing statements, Pacheco said:

“Pro-life and pro-family groups fit much more into the so-called ‘Anti-Terrorism Law’ than many left-wing groups and social movements accused of using violence and vandalism.”

“Pro-family and pro-life groups are hate groups. They were born that way in the United States, they remain that way in Brazil. It is not by chance that its emergence in the 1940s and 1950s and its hardening in the 1960s and 1970s is directly linked to a conservative and white reaction in the United States. And its roots go even further, in the slavery period.”

Framing the pro-life movement as a terrorist movement is an idea accepted only among the most radical extremists on the left.

Actually, the modern pro-life movement was born in the U.S., but Pacheco was wrong to say that this movement was born in the 1940s. It was actually born in the late 19th century, as I demonstrate in my article “Anthony Comstock: the first pro-life activist in the modern history.”

By trying to link the pro-life movement to issues of slavery, Pacheco only proves that he imported the black supremacist agenda from the U.S., which uses any and all issues to blame whites for everything that is bad and to portray the black supremacist movement as eternally deserving tax money, political advantages and treats from the leftist media.

Pacheco’s ideological blindness prevents him from seeing that black women abort their babies almost five times more than white women. Thus, when the pro-life movement fights to save babies, black baby lives are especially benefited. Accusing anyone who saves these babies from having slavery connections is an insanity worthy of the extremism of black supremacism.

With a typical far-left-wing imagination, Pacheco argues that “abortion was known to be one of the many strategies that enslaved black women in the United States found to stop the enslavement of their descendants.”

For Pacheco, abortion for black women is justified because they use it to save their future generations from white oppression!

Going even further in his extremism, Pacheco says: “Pro-life groups are emerging as a reaction to civil rights movements.” He argues that a movement that saves the lives of black babies is a movement against black rights. I’ve read a lot of madness in leftist texts, but Pacheco’s statements, 100 percent imported from the black supremacist movement in the U.S., deserve the Oscar of aberrations.

Pacheco then says:

“In the 1960s and 1970s, the Civil Rights movement, which left the traditional white family at bay, would be added by the sexual liberation movement, the first gay parade after the Stonewall episode, the feminist fight for women’s autonomy and the first decision in the history of the Supreme Court in 1973 to liberalize legal abortion. It is not by chance that the oldest pro-life and pro-family organizations appear in this period. It is not a recovery of religious order, it is not just a preservation of morality, it is the maintenance of a structure of violence and subjection in which the Bible will only appear as an alibi, and not as a principle.”

It is obvious that Pacheco is receiving training from U.S. black supremacist movements. It is impossible to say that he is not receiving funds and other economic incentives as an evangelist for this extremism. After all, who is paying his bills while he is living in New York? Who is paying his bills while he, as an immigrant in the U.S., uses his articles and Twitter to attack Trump and praise the Democratic Party?

Pacheco raises the ideas of the black American supremacist movement as if they had been the decisive factor for the liberation of black slaves, when history clearly shows that white evangelicals started this fight. If it depended on blacks, slavery would exist in the U.S. and Brazil today. In fact, today Africa continues with its ancient tradition, existing long before the first European stepped on African soil, of slavery. Blacks enslaving blacks.

According to the Global Slavery Index,

“On any given day in 2016, an estimated 9.2 million men, women, and children were living in modern slavery in Africa. The region has the highest rate of prevalence, with 7.6 people living in modern slavery for every 1,000 people in the region.”

That is, right in the 21st century, Africa has the highest global rate of modern slavery. To this day, Africa does not celebrate the end of slavery because blacks have never stopped enslaving blacks.

However, instead of moving to Africa to help blacks who now live as slaves under black bosses, Pacheco prefers to embrace the radicalism of U.S. black supremacism, which uses issues of over 150 years ago to profit from companies and government.

If Pacheco does not want to move to Africa because of its endemic poverty, he can move to oil-rich Saudi Arabia where blacks desperately need help. According to a 2020 report from the British newspaper The Telegraph titled “Investigation: African migrants ‘left to die’ in Saudi Arabia’s hellish Covid detention centres,” African immigrants in Saudi Arabia are suffering unimaginable horrors. The report said,

Saudi Arabia, one of the wealthiest countries on earth, is keeping hundreds if not thousands of African migrants locked in heinous conditions reminiscent of Libya’s slave camps as part of a drive to stop the spread of Covid-19, an investigation by The Sunday Telegraph has found.

The migrants, several displaying scars on their backs, claim they are beaten by guards who hurl racial abuse at them. “It’s hell in here. We are treated like animals and beaten every day,” said Abebe, an Ethiopian who has been held at one of the centres for more than four months. “My only crime is leaving my country in search of a better life. But they beat us with whips and electric cords as if we were murderers.”

Oil-rich Saudi Arabia has long exploited migrant labour from Africa and Asia. In June 2019, an estimated 6.6m foreign workers made up about 20 per cent of the Gulf nation’s population, most occupying low paid and often physically arduous jobs.

“We eat a tiny piece of bread in the day and rice in the evening. There’s almost no water, and the toilets are overflowing. It spills over to where we eat. The smell, we grow accustomed to. But there’s over a hundred of us in a room, and the heat is killing us,” said another young Ethiopian man.

African migrants enjoy few legal rights and many complain of exploitation, sexual and racial abuse from employers.

African Muslims know very well that they are mistreated in Saudi Arabia. Even so, they immigrate to this dictatorial Islamic nation because in Africa they have lived virtually in poverty and slavery for thousands of years.

Pacheco and his BLM allies should be challenged to move to Saudi Arabia and help blacks. Or at least they could travel to Saudi Arabia to do some protests.

Pacheco then concludes his far-left-wing text against pro-life and pro-family groups by saying:

“It is not possible to demand consistency in the messages of Jesus by fundamentalist evangelical groups in the pro-life and pro-family movements… The best thing to do is to face the fact that a group of racist, sexist, classist, violent and rights-denying origin it is increasingly stronger, more aggressive, and they will use from the Bible to Constitutional Law to maintain their ideal society project.”

It is a shame for the Baptist Church to keep Pacheco as a minister as his real occupation is U.S. black supremacist activism.

According to the far-left-wing website Intercept, where Pacheco is a columnist, he is:

“Theologian formed by the Pontifical Catholic University in Rio, activist, assistant minister in the Baptist Church in São Gonçalo, author of ‘Occupy, Resist, Subvert’ (2016) and ‘Black Theology: The Anti-Racist-Breath of the Spirit’ (2019); studying theology at Union Theological Seminary (Columbia University) in NY.”

The Union Theological Seminary is one of the oldest and left-wing theological institutions in the United States.

According to The Christian Post:

“A New York Times interview with the theologian Serene Jones, the current president of Union Theological Seminary, is getting some attention given that Jones enthusiastically tosses multiple cherished doctrines of Christian orthodoxy. Virgin birth? ‘Bizarre,’ she says. God as omnipotent and omniscient? ‘A fabrication of Roman juridical theory and Greek mythology.’ The resurrection of Jesus? Pfft! ‘For me, the message of Easter is that love is stronger than life or death. That’s a much more awesome claim than that they put Jesus in the tomb and three days later he wasn’t there.’”

The president of the Union Theological Seminary believes that Jesus was not born of a virgin and still finds this idea “bizarre.” She believes that God’s omnipotence and omniscience are fabrications. And she doesn’t believe in Jesus’ resurrection.

So Pacheco is graduating from a radically left-wing theological institution, importing all this extremism into Brazil, and he wants to convince the Brazilian evangelical public that his import is good, but that the import of the U.S. pro-life movement is bad.

The rise of Pacheco as a prominent left-wing evangelical, who is now a Brazilian immigrant in the U.S., was a problem created by the U.S. In 2017, to cover the fantastic phenomenon that “Evangelical Christians are the fastest-growing political movement in Brazil,” the National Public Radio, owned by the U.S. government, produced the report “Brazilian Street Preacher Spreads Progressive Message,” totally dedicated to Ronilso Pacheco, whom NPR described as “A preacher in Rio de Janeiro [who] is attracting crowds through a combination of evangelical traditions and liberation theology.”

NPR also said, “Pacheco, a Brazilian Baptist, is part of a growing group of progressive evangelicals who go against the current of conservative evangelical megachurches,” adding, “He finds inspiration from the 1960s in Brazil when progressive Protestants mixed with Catholic liberation theologists to become major players in leftist organizing.”

Liberation theology preached by Pacheco has nothing to do with the evangelical growth in Brazil. This massive evangelical growth is conservative, not liberal. So NPR should spotlight conservative evangelicals. But NPR decided to spotlight a radical left-wing evangelical against such movement.

It is not the first time the U.S. government grants prominence to left-wing blacks who are against conservative evangelicals. In 2019, the Trump administration awarded a Brazilian left-wing black sorcerer with a history of fight against conservative evangelicals.

A 29 July 2020 report titled “Brazil: How progressive theologians hope to re-establish dialogue with the Christian right” in the Sight magazine mentioned several left-wing Catholics and Protestants. Among Protestants, it mentioned Ariovaldo Ramos, former director of World Vision Brazil, and Ronilso Pacheco, described by Sight as the author of “a book about black Liberation Theology in Brazil.”

Sight should be renamed Blindness, because it was unable to see the Marxist dangers of Liberation Theology. Sight said,

“The [Liberation Theology] movement also suffered with the offensive of the neo-Pentecostal churches that began to grow in poor, working-class neighbourhoods all over Brazil in the 1980s. Since then, Liberation Theology declined as a social phenomenon…”

It is a real conclusion. Fernando Haddad, a socialist candidate defeated by right-wing Jair Bolsonaro in the 2018 Brazilian presidential election, attributed his defeat to the neo-Pentecostals (neo-charismatics) and their Prosperity Gospel.

Quoting Ariovaldo Ramos, Sight complained:

“Most of the flourishing Brazilian neo-Pentecostalists gradually allied with far right-wing ideas, reacting with particular criticism to moral changes in society and in Christianism, explains pastor Ramos.”

Interestingly, many Brazilian conservative mega-churches are led by black charismatic ministers. But Pacheco and Ramos condemn them just because they do not follow Liberation Theology. Pacheco is working to lead black evangelicals in Brazil to his Liberation Theology.

Pacheco has been propagandized by many other left-wing publications. The Immanent Frame said,

“A significant bloc of evangelicals diverges from the fundamentalist Pentecostalism described above. [Left-wing] Benedita da Silva, Brazil’s first Black woman deputy, senator, and Rio state governor, has for decades invoked her evangelical [Presbyterian] faith and collaboration with liberationist Catholics in her social struggles and political career. She even drew the attention of Jesse Jackson, who wrote the English-edition preface to her biography. [Left-wing] Baptist pastors such as Jardim Gramacho, RJ’s Waldimir de Souza, São Gonçalo’s Ronilso Pacheco, and Niteroi’s Henrique Viera continue efforts to ‘marry’ evangelical faith and social awareness [Liberation Theology], a regional effort among prominent socially minded Latin American evangelicals since the 1974 First International Congress on World Evangelization (ICOWE) in Lausanne, Switzerland. Evangelical pastors help to rebuild terreiros [temples of voodoo] that militias burnt down. Black Baptist pastors also lead the field of anti-racist education. Babalawo [sorcerer], racial justice [black Liberation Theology] advocate, and educator Ivanir dos Santos even won a 2019 religious liberty award from Trump’s State Department—ostensibly Bolsonaro’s geopolitical ally.”

Even a left-wing publication found a perplexing case that the Trump administration awarding a left-wing sorcerer.

The fact that left-wingers use Lausanne as base for their left-wing activism is explained by my article: “Karl Marx’s Spirit in Lausanne: Theology of Integral Mission.”

Ronilso Pacheco’s “Black Theology” is black, but not from skin-colored. It is sheer black Liberation Theology. It is black from the dense leftist darkness of a white European man named Karl Marx, who fills with hatred and revolts all the hearts idolizing him. Pacheco has become one of those idolaters.

If instead of spending money and staying at the liberal Union Theological Seminary in NY, Pacheco had gone to Africa as a missionary to free slaves, the investment would have been much more useful. But unlike Brazil and the U.S., where extremists use the theme of slavery to get money and funds without suffering violence, in Africa they would be beaten or lynched by black bosses who refuse to free their black slaves.

While Pacheco is busy importing extremism from the American left into Brazil, we in the pro-life movement will continue to be busy saving the lives of babies — including black babies, who are among the biggest victims of legal abortion.

And we conservative evangelicals will keep proclaiming the Gospel, healing the sick and casting out demons, including from pseudo-Christians who mix ideas of Christianity with Marxism, orishas and other demons.

Portuguese version of this article: Teólogo batista esquerdista defende BLM contra evangélicos conservadores e diz que grupos pró-vida e pró-família se enquadram na Lei Antiterrorismo

Source: Last Days Watchman

Recommended Reading:

While black lives are lost in abortion and broken homes, “Black Lives Matter” movement preaches Marxism, which fuels the destruction of the black family through abortion and broken homes

Africa Calls African-Americans To Return to Their Original Home in Africa

Brutal Nigerian Mafia, Which Uses Witchcraft, Advancing in Sweden

Brazilian Left-Wing Sorcerer with History of Fight against Conservative Christians Is Awarded by the Trump Administration

Africa Calls African-Americans To Return to Their Original Home in Africa

By Julio Severo

As a wave of black supremacism is sweeping the United States, with black militants using any real or perceived injustice to loot, destroy, rape and kill, a nation in Africa is offering a solution that could appease them: To live in a nation dominated by blacks.

Crowded streets of Accra, Ghana

Taking advantage of the tensions provoked by black supremacism boiling over in the United States, Ghana is encouraging African-Americans to abandon the U.S. to return to their original home — Africa.

The plea is a continuation of Ghana’s “Year of Return” initiative, which officially was launched in September 2018. At the launch, Ghana’s president, Nana Akufo-Addo, praised African-Americans, asking Americans with African descent to consider a return to Africa.

The year 2019 was chosen because it marked 400 years since the first African slaves arrived in the then-English colony of Virginia in 1619.

“We know of the extraordinary achievements and contributions they [Africans in the diaspora] made to the lives of the Americans, and it is important that this symbolic year — 400 years later — we commemorate their existence and their sacrifices,” Akufo-Addo declared, as reported by Africa Renewal, a magazine published by the United Nations.

On June 5, the Ghanaian Minister of Tourism, Arts and Culture, Barbara Oteng-Gyasi, echoed the Akufo-Addo words, citing the death of George Floyd, a black drug-addict in Minneapolis who died after resisting the police. His death set off a series of violent riots orchestrated by the Marxist organization Black Lives Matter across the United States.

Oteng-Gyasi cited Floyd’s death as a reason why African-Americans should return to Africa.

“We continue to open our arms and invite all our brothers and sisters home. Ghana is your home. Africa is your home. We have our arms wide open ready to welcome you home. Please take advantage, come home build a life in Ghana. You do not have to stay where you are not wanted forever. You have a choice and Africa is waiting for you,” Oteng-Gyasi said, according to The Independent Ghana, a Ghanaian news outlet.

The reality is that blacks brought as slaves from Africa were not stolen away from their homes by Europeans. They were chained up and sold by fellow Africans. They were already slaves in Africa. If they had never been sent to work in America, they would remain slaves in Africa. In America, their descendants received what descendants of slaves in Africa never got.

The idea of white European slave-traders chasing down and capturing innocent native Africans — an image popularized by Marxist propaganda and black supremacists — is a total farce.

Unlike European settlers, who went to America to live and colonize, Africans were taken only to work, and they received no worse treatment than African slaves received from blacks who owned slaves in Africa. The idea that a worker or slave is entitled to everything from the owner is so ridiculous that if a African millionaire has ten Asian employees (or semi-slaves or even slaves, as this is not uncommon in Africa) and those employees demand all of their owner’s properties, the millionaire will laugh at them.

If African-Americans believe that by returning to Africa they are abandoning the dark history of slavery and oppression, they are sadly mistaken. Historically, blacks always enslaved blacks. Africans always enslaved Africans. In many parts of Africa, slavery still exists: Negro enslaving Negro.

With information from The Western Journal.

Portuguese version of this article: África chama os negros americanos para voltarem para seu lar original na África

German version of this article: Afrika ruft schwarze US-Amerikaner zur Rückkehr in ihre ursprüngliche Heimat Afrika auf

Source: Last Days Watchman

Recommended Reading:

Answering a gay activist and his nonsense on Saudi Arabia, slavery, women’s rights and the deity of homosexuality

Protestant Church Founded by George Washington Rejects Him and Embraces Feminism and Liberation Theology

Google’s Racial War Against Whites?

Racist flag and Constitution?

White Teen Killed by Black Cop and Black Teen Killed by White Cop and Media Preferences

Answering a gay activist and his nonsense on Saudi Arabia, slavery, women’s rights and the deity of homosexuality

By Julio Severo

On June 2019, my blog Last Days Watchman was targeted by The Slowly Boiled Frog, a homosexualist blog usually targeting big conservative organizations. It is administrated by David Cary Hart, who purportedly uses his blog to express his “observations of LGBT issues, gun politics and progressive ideas.”

In his article titled “We should excuse Christian bigotry because the Saudis are worse,” he said,

Julio Severo is the author of “Prophetic Prayers: Daily Prayer Guide Based on the Book of Proverbs.” Intriguing no doubt. Julio Severo is also the author of Taylor Swift Music Video Attacks People Who Protest Against LGBTQ Behavior, But Refrains from Condemning Islamic Nations that Execute Homosexuals. Within this intellectual masterpiece is this:

If Swift treated Saudis the way she has treated Christians in her music video, the Saudi reprisals would be fast.

If she does not accept Christians who do not accept homosexual depravity, she should target George Washington, the first U.S. president. He never executed homosexuals, but he discharged dishonorably from the Army a soldier who committed sodomy (homosexual acts).

Then he begins his criticism:

Get a grip Julio. We can choose not to visit Saudi Arabia. However, in the United States (Severo is Brazilian) anti-LGBT Christians are trying to impose their religious beliefs on everyone else, often as public policy. Those same “kind” Christians demonize and marginalize people based on ancient texts of dubious provenance. Suppose Moonies were in the majority.

If, as David Cary Hart said, U.S. gay activists do not need to criticize Saudi Arabia because they can choose not to visit this Islamic dictatorship, so why have they leveled non-stop criticism on Russia since Putin approved a law banning homosexual propaganda to children and teens in 2013?

Why do they criticize so much Russia and its law protecting children from homosexuality if they can just choose not to visit Russia?

There is a serious problem. U.S. gay activists are trying to impose their homosexual beliefs on everyone else, especially schoolchildren, often as public policy. Those same “kind” gay activists use the mainstream media to demonize and marginalize Christians purely based on their homosexual depravations.

Saudi Arabia and Russia have their own ways to address such homosexual activism. Saudi Arabia kills the indoctrination and its indoctrinators. Russia kills only the indoctrination, leaving homosexuals live their depravities in their own private places. Even so, U.S. gay activists have chosen not to criticize Saudi Arabia and directed all their criticism to Russia. Is their criticism politically motivated?

As to Moonies, even though they have an apparently nice right-wing speech, their religious philosophy puts Rev. Moon as a messiah above Jesus Christ, the only true Messiah. This philosophy is anti-Christian.

Hart said,

“As for our first president, when he assumed office we were slavers. Women had no rights at all. It would be almost three years before the Bill of Rights was ratified. So what is the point?”

Slavery was common in all societies. In fact, it is common in several African societies today, where blacks enslave blacks. Slavery was not begun by Christians, but was ended by them. It was not secularists, atheists and definitely not gay activists who ended slavery. It was Christians. It was evangelicals in England and America. And in societies with accepted homosexuality, slavery had the added suffering of homosexual abuses, with homosexuals targeting especially children for homosexual slavery. Isn’t this a good point?

As to women in George Washington’s time, even though they could not vote, they were fully protected by men, who honored them. If a man disguised as a woman tried to enter a female restroom, there were real men to punish the abuser, and laws protected women and their male protectors against homosexual abusers. Today, with more “women’s rights,” men disguised as women can enter female restrooms, and men are legally hindered from protecting women, who are even afraid to ask help because homosexuals have legally become more protected than women and children.

Because of homosexual rights, women are losing their rights of being protected. And children also are losing. And men are losing the right to protect their wives, mothers, daughters, sisters and boys.

Next, Hart says,

Julio Severo also has a blog titled: Last Days Watchman which seems to be an homage to prosperity gospel grifter and Trumper Paula White. According to Severo: “Bringing you articles by a man who has felt God's call to alert God's people in these last days.”

People have been shouting “the end is near” for centuries and they are never wrong. What they often claim is to have uniquely heard the voice of their deity when no one else has. They have been selected, you see, for their piety. They are special. They then claim that they are doing the bidding of their god. I often wonder if these people really believe their own BS.

What he calls “deity” in my case is Jesus Christ. Is not it much better to serve Jesus than to serve sin? Or is there something special in AIDS and STDs produced by the deity of homosexuality? I have served Jesus for decades and he has healed me from diseases, delivered me from sins and blessed me with blessings I do not deserve. Has the deity of homosexuality been able to do the same thing for its victims?

Because Hart reminded his readers that I am a Brazilian, interestingly his surname, Hart, is translated “veado” in Portuguese, whose synonym is “fag.” He cannot complain that Brazilian dictionaries have perverted anything because he and his homosexual accomplices have perverted much, much more. Traditionally Brazilian dictionaries define homosexuality as synonymous with “pederasty” (sex between men and boys). It is synonymous also with “sodomy,” an old word for homosexuality. The Webster Dictionary (1913) says that “pederasty” is synonymous with “sodomy.”

When you see a lot of sexual scandals in the Catholic Church involving priests abusing boys you know that they have a problem with pederasty and homosexuality. The Catholic Church will be able to solve its pederasty problem only after it solves its homosexual problem.

Hart said about The Slowly Boiled Frog,

“The primary mission of this blog is to reflect on issues pertaining to LGBT equality. Equality is achieved with equal protection under the law in every state of the union. To achieve equality requires (but is not limited to) national marriage equality and passage of the Employment Non-Discrimination ACT (ENDA).”

Interestingly, The Slowly Boiled Frog means, according to Hart, “Boil a frog slowly and it fails to appreciate its own peril.” Men involved in homosexuality are being slowly boiled by Satan, but they fail to appreciate their own peril. Unwittingly, Hart revealed his own tragic reality. He is himself The Slowly Boiled Frog, or The Slowly Boiled Homosexual.

God created man and woman. They are equal in importance and different in roles and functions. The deity of homosexuality has created nothing good, but only perverted what God created. There is equality between true, real and biological sexes, but no equality between perverted sex and biological sex. Even so, at the guise of fighting for equality what Hart and other perverted creatures want is to do exactly what they condemn in others: They are trying to impose their homosexual beliefs on everyone else, especially schoolchildren, often as public policy. They demonize and marginalize Christians purely based on their homosexual depravations.

So I am not surprised that my blog has been demonized by Hart (veado).

Portuguese version of this article: Respondendo a um ativista gay e suas tolices sobre Arábia Saudita, escravidão, direitos das mulheres e a deidade da homossexualidade

Source: Last Days Watchman

Recommended Reading on the U.S. Left against Julio Severo:

Largest U.S. Gay Magazine Furious Over Evangelical Protest Against U.S. Government Effort to Decriminalize Homosexuality Around the World

Who Is Bothered that I Asked More Conservative Energy from the Family Research Council against the Gay Agenda? Right Wing Watch, of the left-wing group People for the American Way!

Incredible! Right Wing Watch, Which Tracks Conservative Stances to Attack Conservative Leaders, Defends Notre Dame Cathedral Against Julio Severo

What Does Right Wing Watch, of People for the American Way, Have Against Me?

Right Wing Watch, of People for the American Way, Blacklists Julio Severo

Right Wing Watch, of the Far-Left-Wing People for the American Way, Worried that I Am Not Supporting Trump’s Decision Nominating a Gay Judge

Patheos Lambasts Julio Severo for Mentioning Islamic Origin of Statue of Liberty

“Die Hard Democrat” Criticizes Julio Severo for Saying that Statue of Liberty Represents a Pagan-Islamic Curse on America

Atheist Ed Brayton: Julio Severo is a Brazilian ‘wingnut’

Reading the Far Left: Left-Wing Wingnuts Call Conservatives What They Are

Reading the Far Left and Its Attack on Breitbart and BarbWire: Gay Perversion, Veiled and Overt

CNN Attacks Roy Moore Just Because He Shared My BarbWire Piece

“Die Hard Democrat” Criticizes Julio Severo for Not Blaming Hurricane Harvey on Global Warming

“Die Hard Democrat” Criticizes Julio Severo for Saying that Statue of Liberty Represents a Pagan-Islamic Curse on America

Another Recommended Reading:

How to Help Julio Severo through the PayPal Account of the Jewish Institute for Global Awareness

Julio Severo seeks to move Christians to daily prayer with ‘Prophetic Prayers’

Protestant Church Founded by George Washington Rejects Him and Embraces Feminism and Liberation Theology

By Julio Severo

There was a day, not too long ago, when any American Protestant church would have been proud to claim George Washington, the first president of the United States and the founder of the American nation, as one of its founders and first members.

George Washington praying

That day has passed.

At Christ Church of Alexandria, Virginia, where the motto is “All are welcome, no exceptions,” its leaders decided its most famous member, George Washington, is no longer welcome.

Christ Church announced last October that it will remove a stone plaque that reads “In memory of George Washington” currently displayed on the left side of the altar.

Washington was one of the founding members of Christ Church, which is affiliated with the Episcopal Church USA. He purchased pew No. 5 when the church opened in 1773 and attended it for more than 20 years. Christ Church was as important to Washington that his family donated one of his Bibles to the church after his death.

Christ Church founded by George Washington

Christ Church said that the stone plaque on the side of the altar has become controversial because Washington owned slaves.

But feminism is not controversial for them. The Episcopal Church USA has embraced the “Mother Earth” theology, a supposedly “Christian” feminism.

Christ Church, founded by Washington, is today so feminist that it does not have a single male pastor listed on its website. All four ministers in this church are female. One of them, the Rev. Ann Gillespie, is a former Hollywood actress who recently included in her sermon a new version of the Apostle’s Creed.

It starts out, “I believe in God, our Mother Bear, source of all being,” and it refers to Mary, the mother of Jesus, as “the bad-ass womanist liberation theologian, Mary.”

This “creed” was concocted by a lesbian woman named Sarah Moon, who is a member of a United Methodist Church in Toledo, Ohio.

Moon declared in a September 2014 blog post she could no longer bear to recite the Apostle’s Creed, so she rewrote it and came up with her own “Feminist Apostle’s Creed.”

The Episcopal Church USA’s website indicates that liberation theology, social justice, Earth worship and inclusiveness take priority over the traditional Christian missions of trying to live a holy life and sharing the Gospel.

So Christ Church, founded by Washington, is today inclusive to liberation theology, feminism and the gay agenda, but it cannot tolerate Washington over slavery.

Slavery was a universal reality in Washington’s time, and even blacks in Africa, centuries before their first contacts with whites, enslaved other blacks. Even blacks in America enslaved blacks. Slavery was not begun by Washington and other Christians, and it was not ended by blacks or liberation theology adherents. It was ended by William Wilberforce and other Protestant whites.

If feminist ministers at Christ Church can see slavery in Washington, why cannot they see the modern slavery?

Do anti-Washington feminist ministers at Christ Church go naked? Almost no American today uses clothes not made by slave labor.

“‘Everyone loves a bargain but the true cost of that latest wardrobe addition is pitiful wages for Bangladesh’s legion of factory workers,’ writes Simon Parry” in his report “The true cost of your cheap clothes: slave wages for Bangladesh factory workers.” Cheap American clothes today are made by slave workers in Bangladesh and other poor nations.

Yet, you do not see feminists and black ativists in America complaining of the plight of those poor modern slaves. You do not see them going naked on boycott. To blame Washington is easier.

Do not anti-Washington feminist ministers at Christ Church use iPhone? Almost no American today goes without iPhone — whose making involves slavery from the beginning to the end.

An essential component of iPhone, Samsung and other smartphones and notebooks is coltan, which is extracted from mines in Congo by slave labor of children as young as 13. Congo in Africa has 80 percent of the world’s coltan, which is sent to factories in China — most notably, the Foxconn factories in Shenzhen. These factories, which produce components for iPhone, are “labor camp,” in which teenage students are forced to work more than double or even triple the overtime limit (36 hours a month under China’s labor laws). Regularly, workers attempt suicide. Even though there are anti-suicide nets to hinder workers from jumping from the roof of the buildings, some have succeeded.

You can see clothed feminists and black activists with their iPhones in their hands complaining of “Washington’s slavery,” but no angry that they are themselves actively supporting modern slavery.

Modern slaves have no time to study.

American history indicates that many white owners allowed their slaves to study. But feminists and blacks in the Protestant church founded by Washington do not care if he was kind or not to their slaves. They want to keep using their iPhones and clothes made by modern slaves, regardless if the slave labor is cruel or not.

Now George Washington is purged from his own church by feminists and liberation theology adherents, in a wave by black activists to remove monuments of white personalities, including Christopher Columbus.

For feminists, liberation theology adherents and black activists, Washington was racist just for being white.

What will come next? Will they remake the U.S. flag — yes, the Old Glory — and the Constitution because they were made by Anglo-Saxon whites and produce a flag and Constitution with the joint participation of blacks, Indians, Chinese, etc.?

Will they remake the U.S. flag and the Constitution because they were made by men and produce a flag and Constitution with the joint participation of homosexuals, etc.?

Will they remake the U.S. flag and the Constitution because they were made by mostly Protestant men and produce a flag and Constitution with the joint participation of Muslims, Hindus, sorcerers, etc.?

When the Protestant church founded by George Washington rejects him but embraces feminism and liberation theology, it is a dark sign of Satanism invading the Protestant foundation of America.

It is time to defend Washington and the Protestant principle of the Bible guiding individuals, families and nations to defeat feminism, liberation theology and the gay agenda. Washington said, “It is impossible to rightly govern a nation without God and the Bible.”

In this spirit, I am sure that while witches, occultists and Satanists were celebrating Halloween in October 31, 2017, Washington would be celebrating the landmark 500 years of the Protestant Reformation.

If even Donald Trump chose to celebrate Halloween, instead of the Protestant Reformation, what expect from Christ Church?

The Protestant church founded by Washington needs more than ever to obey the Bible.

America founded by Washington needs more than ever to obey the Bible.

If America denies and forgets her spiritual foundation, God will forget her.

With information from WorldNetDaily, DailyMail and Huffington Post.

Portuguese version of this article: Igreja protestante fundada por George Washington o rejeita e adota o feminismo e a teologia da libertação

Source: Last Days Watchman

Recommended Reading:

George Washington: “It is the duty of all nations to acknowledge God”

Roy Moore Attacked Because He Has the Same Anti-Homosexual Stance of George Washington

Left-Wing Groups Plan Nationwide “Deface Columbus Day”

Google’s Racial War Against Whites?

Trump, the Reformation and Halloween