Showing posts with label smoking. Show all posts
Showing posts with label smoking. Show all posts

Monday, July 27, 2020

From Conservative Pro-Life Presbyterian Champion to Hero of Gay Activists in the Reagan Administration


From Conservative Pro-Life Presbyterian Champion to Hero of Gay Activists in the Reagan Administration

By Julio Severo
C. Everett Koop (1916-2013) was a devout Presbyterian, or conservative Reformed (as Calvinists choose to define themselves), physician who campaigned nationally against abortion and euthanasia in the 1970s. In that time, he published his books “The Right to Live, the Right to Die” and “Whatever Happened to the Human Race?,” which he co-authored with Dr. Francis A. Schaeffer.
C. Everett Koop
Before becoming a celebrity, Koop was a very successful and respected pediatric surgeon at Children’s Hospital of Pennsylvania, with almost 300 academic articles to his name. He pioneered surgery on newborns. In the 1950s, he drew national headlines for innovative surgeries by successfully separating three sets of conjoined twins and by reconstructing the chest of a baby born with the heart outside the body. He was known for his support of the rights of disabled children.
He became the first editor of the Journal of Pediatric Surgery when it was founded in 1966.
He was one of the most prominent and respected leaders in the Christian pro-life movement.
So it is no wonder that as soon as Ronald Reagan (1911-2004) became the President of the United States in 1981, he appointed Koop as Surgeon General to bring his strong pro-life convictions to the conservative administration and also to bring the influence of Schaeffer.
The fact that Reagan appointed a famous pro-life evangelical surgeon as the highest medical authority in the United States is a testament to his commitment to conservative evangelicals and their pro-life values. In fact, Reagan himself was the first president to write a pro-life book, “Abortion and the Conscience of the Nation,” published by Thomas Nelson Publishers, a leading Calvinist publishing house.
Dr. C. Everett Koop is widely regarded as the most influential surgeon general in American history and played a crucial role in changing public attitudes about smoking.
He served as surgeon general from 1982 to 1989, under Presidents Ronald Reagan and George H.W. Bush.
Even though Presbyterians or Calvinists are known as tolerant of smoking, as a former pipe smoker Presbyterian Koop carried out a crusade to end smoking in the United States. He said cigarettes were as addictive as heroin and cocaine.
“Smoking kills 300,000 Americans a year,” he said in one talk. “Smokers are 10 times more likely to develop lung cancer than nonsmokers, two times more likely to develop heart disease. Smoking a pack a day takes six years off a person’s life.”
When Koop took office, 33 percent of Americans smoked; when he left, the percentage had dropped to 26. By 1987, 40 states had restricted smoking in public places, 33 had prohibited it on public conveyances and 17 had banned it in offices and other work sites. More than 800 local antismoking ordinances had been passed, and the Reagan administration had restricted smoking in 6,800 federal buildings. Antismoking campaigns by private groups like the American Lung Association and the American Heart Association had accelerated.
In taking on the tobacco lobby, he was also taking on powerful politicians from tobacco-growing states. After he accused the tobacco industry of directing advertising at children and threatening human lives, Gov. Jim Hunt of North Carolina, a Democrat, called for his impeachment.
In 1996, he rapped Republican presidential hopeful Bob Dole for suggesting that tobacco was not invariably addictive, saying Dole’s comments “either exposed his abysmal lack of knowledge of nicotine addiction or his blind support of the tobacco industry.”
Today conservatives understand the need of antismoking laws. President Donald Trump also restricted smoking in 2019.
Even though Koop was right on smoking, the heavy pressure on him, especially coming from powerful pro-abortion groups and journalists, took a heavy toll.
President Ronald Reagan asked Koop to write a report about the impact of abortion on the physical, emotional and psychological health of women.
This was a big chance for Koop to put his famous convictions into action, but he declined the historic opportunity. He sent a letter back to Reagan stating that there was insufficient research to write a report. Pro-abortion activists celebrated his answer as astounding victory. Angered prolife leaders could hardly believe that this was the same man who ten years earlier had compared abortion to Nazi genocide in the movie and book “Whatever Happened to the Human Race?”
Now, conservatives were asking the question: “Whatever happened to conservative pro-life Presbyterian C. Everett Koop?”
Koop traveled the country in 1979 and 1980 giving speeches that predicted a progression “from liberalized abortion to infanticide to passive euthanasia to active euthanasia, indeed to the very beginnings of the political climate that led to Auschwitz, Dachau and Belsen.”
Koop represented the best hopes of the pro-life movement in the conservative Reagan administration. Because of his high pro-life credentials, probably any conservative president would have appointed this pro-life champion to any government post.
Reagan gave him a golden chance to implement his pro-life principles. But what Reagan discovered is that the powerful pro-life leader he saw with Francis Schaeffer lost his pro-life content when appointed to a high-level office in the U.S. government.
At least, Koop could have applied to the abortion issue the same principles he rightly applied to the smoking issue. But he never did it. He was defeated by the left-wing pressures on him.
As many Presbyterians Koop maintained his personal opposition to abortion as a private matter. After he left office, he told medical students abortion violated their Hippocratic oath.
Koop also shocked the Left and the Right (especially the Right) alike in the 1980s exactly when the AIDS epidemic began by presenting HIV and AIDS not as moral issues, but as a health issue. He shocked the Left because left-wingers did not expect him to support homosexuality, and he shocked the Right because right-wingers expected him to oppose homosexuality.
Gay activists have used the AIDS issue for decades as a tool to get millions in taxpayer dollars to fund their movement and agenda, and their victory was thanks to Koop.
Koop also maneuvered around uncooperative Reagan administration officials in 1988 to send a pro-sodomy AIDS pamphlet to more than 100 million U.S. households, the largest public “health” campaign ever made by mailing. He promoted condoms, “protected” sodomy and sex education to children to “stop” the spread of AIDS. Actually, his campaign increased homosexual activity and activism.
Then, in the midst of a heated national debate about how best to halt the spread of AIDS, Koop blocked the Reagan administration’s plans for extensive testing. To the applause of gay groups, Koop said the disclosure of the test results could ruin the careers of those tested.
Koop’s speeches made him a hero to gay and left-wing groups of America, including journalists. Gay activists chanted “Koop, Koop” at his appearances and booed other officials of the Reagan administration.
Christian conservatives were furious, saying Koop was promoting the gay agenda, while he kept pushing for condoms, “protected” sodomy and sex education for schoolchildren.
Media coverage was generally quite positive, with journalists defending Koop and attacking his Christian critics. He became loved by journalists.
Koop personally opposed homosexuality and believed sex should be saved for marriage. Yet, he never let his conservative principles guide him in the Reagan administration, even though he was appointed exclusively for his strong pro-life stances. He kept his conservative convictions a private matter. The outspoken conservative of the 1970s disappeared in his private life and never appeared in the public life of the Reagan administration.
At least, Koop could have applied to the AIDS and homosexual issues the same principles he rightly applied to the smoking issue. But he never did it. He was defeated by the left-wing pressures on him.
So the greatest victory ever to the homosexual movement, granting it the privilege to use the AIDS issue as a propaganda machine to make gay groups wealthy, did not come from a left-wing leader in a left-wing administration. It came from a devout, conservative pro-life Presbyterian in the conservative Reagan administration. It came from a pro-life leader who had been directly supervised by Francis Schaeffer (1912-1984), the famous Presbyterian theologian.
Koop in a government post is also a lesson for pro-lifers and Christians. There are people fighting for pro-life and Christian values just for opportunism. You cannot see their hearts, but if given a government post, they will have no problem to let their hearts show their real motivation.
The massive pro-life propaganda of Koop, in books and movies, in the 1970s brought him massive fame, especially because he was with Schaeffer. This propaganda was instrumental for Reagan to appoint him. Yet, Koop disappointed Reagan and conservative Christians in the abortion and homosexual issues.
The Koop case was a moral tragedy in the Reagan administration and in the pro-life movement. He could have used his principles — which he used successfully against smoking — against abortion, AIDS and homosexuality, but he never did it.
If smoking is harmful, what is abortion? What is sodomy? What is AIDS? Actually, it made no sense to condemn smoking and exempt abortion and sodomy.
Koop was appointed by Reagan to show his conservative stances, but he chose to hide them, for fear of left-wing journalists and homosexualists.
Because of Koop, the most conservative Republican administration in the modern U.S. history displeased conservatives and pleased left-wingers as far as abortion, AIDS and homosexuality are concerned. It is not what you expect when a conservative administration appoints a conservative pro-life evangelical champion, but it is what you get when the convictions of the conservative champion get heavily tested through too much power in a government post.
With information from The Daily Beast, Associated Press, ABC News, CNN, New York Times, Reuters and Banner of Truth.
Recommended Reading:

Tuesday, December 24, 2019

Donald Trump raises the legal smoking age from 18 to 21 for both cigarettes and vapes to protect young people of the evils of smoking


Donald Trump raises the legal smoking age from 18 to 21 for both cigarettes and vapes to protect young people of the evils of smoking

By Julio Severo
Donald Trump signed a sweeping bill on December 20, 2019 that includes raising the legal smoking age from 18 to 21 for both cigarettes and vapes.
Trump signs anti-smoking law
The legislation was supported by Republicans and Democrats, socialists and capitalists.
A crackdown on youth smoking, by changing the minimum age for cigarette and other tobacco purchases from 18 to 21, has become necessary because cigarette smoking produces 480,000 deaths per year, including over 41,000 deaths resulting from secondhand smoke exposure. This is about one in five deaths annually, or 1,300 deaths every day.
Banning access to cigarettes to 21-year-old people is expected to produce major downstream health benefits, with the U.S. government estimating nearly 250,000 fewer deaths due to tobacco over several decades.
That not smoking is much better than smoking is an experience that Trump knows by himself. A White House physician’s report showed that Trump is much healthier than he looks because he doesn’t drink or smoke.
He has abstained from both for a lifetime.
There are certain things that it is better to abstain from. And if these things cause a big social harm, it is correct enact laws to protect children and teens, and Trump just did it regarding smoking.
Yet, smoking is not the only evil threatening young people.
Homosexuality was traditionally criminalized in the United States until the 1990s, when the U.S. Supreme Court, instigated by a powerful homosexual lobby, struck down anti-sodomy laws.
The liberalization of homosexuality may have been excellent for homosexualist groups, but it was not healthy to young people. Such liberalization has become a serious problem not only because homosexuality has increasingly received state protection and promotion, but also because, just as in the case of smoking, young people are the most vulnerable victims.
The Pew Research Center, in a report titled “U.S. has world’s highest rate of children living in single-parent households,” said,
For decades, the share of U.S. children living with a single parent has been rising, accompanied by a decline in marriage rates and a rise in births outside of marriage. A new Pew Research Center study of 130 countries and territories shows that the U.S. has the world’s highest rate of children living in single-parent households.
Almost a quarter of U.S. children under the age of 18 live with one parent and no other adults (23%), more than three times the share of children around the world who do so (7%). The study, which analyzed how people’s living arrangements differ by religion, also found that U.S. children from Christian and religiously unaffiliated families are about equally likely to live in this type of arrangement.
In comparison, 3% of children in China… live in single-parent households.
That is, even communist China protects families better than the U.S. does, even though China has an infamous compulsory family planning policy of limiting the number of babies by couples.
Single-parenting makes children and teens vulnerable to identity confusion, including sexual confusion. Because of their state of confusion, they are especially vulnerable to the predatory homosexual propaganda and indoctrination. Without a necessary intervention from the government, with single-parenting increasing in the U.S., inevitably homosexuality will increase among young people too.
The next generations of Americans, victims of the sexual irresponsibility of parents, will be easy preys of predatory homosexuality because of single parenting.
Children from single-parent homes have already enough problems. To expose them to additional pressures, especially the predatory homosexual propaganda and indoctrination, should be a crime.
If smoking is harmful to young people, why think that homosexuality is not?
If the U.S. government can ban smoking to protect young people, why not ban predatory homosexual propaganda and indoctrination to protect children and teens?
With information from DailyMail, Pew Research Center and Business Insider.
Recommended Reading: