Thursday, September 27, 2018

Victim of Facebook’s War Against Conservatives: My Account Has Been Permanently Terminated by Facebook


Victim of Facebook’s War Against Conservatives: My Account Has Been Permanently Terminated by Facebook

Without legal assistance, I am permanently banned from Facebook

By Julio Severo
Update: Seven hours after I published this article, Facebook unlocked my account, AFTER I sent my documents to it. This is the second time that Facebook wants my documents. Years ago, Facebook also disabled my account and only unlocked it after I sent documents proving that I am Julio Severo, the official author of the statements that I publish against the homosexual agenda and Islam. How Facebook will use these documents, I do not know, but I will follow the words of Jesus: “Blessed are you when they persecute you…”
After months of harassment, censorship and persecution, Facebook has disabled, terminated my account (https://www.facebook.com/julio.severo). This seems to be part of its effort to stop conservative voices in this election. See: Facebook is building a “fake news war room” inside its headquarters to fight against conservative information during the upcoming US and Brazilian elections.
I am a victim of Facebook’s war against conservatives.
Facebook had been relentlessly harassing me for my conservative stances. For the last 14 months, Facebook punished me with its infamous 30-day blocks at least 5 times. You can find more information in this report about the previous block: Facebook Censors Comment about Lesbians But It Does Not Censor Homosexual Comments against Jesus Christ.
Perhaps one of the most shameful acts of Facebook against me was to censor Leviticus 18:22, a famous Bible verse that I had posted on my profile, but Facebook did not like it and removed it. See my article: Help! Facebook Is Censoring Bible Verses
In this sacred verse God says: “You shall not lie with a male as with a woman. It is an abomination.”
This censorship against a Bible verse immediately became headline on WND (WorldNetDaily), in a report titled “Famous Bible verse too sizzling for Facebook.”
Because of this scandal, Facebook contacted WND with this message:
“As soon as we were notified of the problem, we began to investigate and restored the content as soon as we were able to identify the mistake. The content has been restored since it didn’t violate our standards. We’ve informed Mr. Severo of the restoration and apologized for the error.” (See the WND report “Facebook finally responds on censoring hot Bible verse”)
Yet, the Bible post was not restored and I have never received any apology from Facebook.
Apparently, Facebook had the idea of solving all its problems and troubles with me over its own dishonesty by banning me.
On September 27, 2018, Facebook sent to me the following short message: “Your Account Has Been Disabled.”
But this is not a new block, a partial punishment. Now it is total and permanent punishment. Facebook has now terminated my personal profile. With Facebook’s termination of my account, Facebook information involving my name virtually disappeared even from Google search, with only a few results. Before, there were thousands of such results.
The only time Facebook ever backtracked on its harassment and bullying against me was when a conservative legal group in California sent a letter to Facebook. See: Facebook Acknowledges Its Own Censorship on Julio Severo. What Happens Now?
To pursue further action against Facebook, this group needed my financial involvement, which I have not.
Because of financial limitations, I cannot hire a legal group to help to defend my cause.
Without a legal group to help defend me from Facebook’s termination of my account after months of harassment, censorship and persecution, I will be kept in the internet’s Gulag: outside of my network of friends I built in my Facebook account. Without legal assistance, I am permanently banned from Facebook.
I entered Facebook in 2009 because this was supposedly a free environment. Above all, because it is American and America traditionally personifies free speech, especially conservative speech. Because this is an American company, not a Cuban or Saudi or North Korean company, I believed that Facebook would be capable of defending free speech for me and others. Not only Facebook has betrayed on the American tradition of defending free speech, but it has been the executor of harassment, censorship and persecution against my conservative and evangelical speech, giving an impression to the world that the current corporate America represents just this: harassment, censorship and persecution of conservative ideas.
I am a conservative evangelical Brazilian. I have a conservative evangelical book (http://www.propheticprayersofficial.com/) published by a division of Thomas Nelson and Zondervan.
I am also a columnist in BarbWire, a conservative U.S. website.
The original America was never against conservative and Christian speech. The original America, which was 98 percent Protestant, was never against evangelical conservative speech.
Are left-wingers free to defend their ideas in America? Certainly so, and they have been doing just it.
Facebook is left-wing and they are fully entitled to be left-wing. But they should be at least honest and say: “Hey, we are a left-wing platform advocating free speech only for left-wingers.”
I would understand their stance and I would respect it. No proper label causes confusion. Instead of using a left-wing label, Facebook portrays itself as unbiased. This is not true. Facebook welcomes left-wingers and their ideas, but not conservatives and their ideas. I speak on the condition of a conservative who has been a victim of Facebook’s biased treatment.
President Donald Trump has voiced concern about Facebook’s biased treatment of conservatives. As a Facebook user, I was a victim of such treatment for a long time. Now Facebook sent my account to its Gulag.
I ask Mr. President Trump to fight against the misrepresentation of America Facebook is doing. Facebook’s censorship of conservative speech is worthy of Cuba, Saudi Arabia and North Korea, not of the America George Washington created and envisioned.
I wait Trump’s actions against Facebook’s biased treatment. Meanwhile, I ask some conservative legal group to help me.
Meanwhile, I am contacting Facebook to revoke its decision to disable my account.
Also, if God has financially blessed you, remember to bless us as we fight for life, family and conservative values. Send a contribution to me and my family, in this link: http://bit.ly/2iMXfmc
Your contribution does not help a fat and useless group, but a family in need of your help and prayers.
Recommended Reading on Facebook censorship:
Recommended Reading on the U.S. Left against Julio Severo:
Another Recommended Reading:

Sunday, September 23, 2018

What Does Right Wing Watch, of People for the American Way, Have Against Me?


What Does Right Wing Watch, of People for the American Way, Have Against Me?

By Julio Severo
Right Wing Watch, a major American socialist group, has for several times, since 2014 (see: People for the American Way’s Leftist Diatribe Against a Brazilian Conservative), blacklisted my articles published by the conservative website BarbWire, and it has “exposed” them to its U.S. left-wing audience for politically incorrect views.
Many prominent U.S. conservative names are in Right Wing Watch’s blacklist. My place in their blacklist is here.
My latest BarbWire article blacklisted by Right Wing Watch is titled “The Transcendent Power of Neoconservatism in the U.S. Media and among Left-Wingers and Right-Wingers.” Right Wing Watch said on September 21, 2018:
“Finally, Julio Severo laments that ‘sadly, [John] McCain was not killed in one of the many wars he helped to provoke.’”
Interestingly, Right Wing Watch is sympathizing with a Republican warmonger. Such defense confirms my argument that U.S. left-wingers and right-wingers are united under the neocon ideology. McCain helped provoke many wars that left an untold number of Christians raped, tortured and slaughtered. If innocent people suffered because of his sins, why could not he suffer for his own sins?
Can you imagine Democrats loving a Republican? Left-wingers, including Obama, just loved McCain.
Why doesn’t Right Wing Watch think that neoconservartism is a threat and exposes my attack on it?
In a September 21, 2018 tweet, Right Wing Watch said, “Bonus: Alex Jones banned from PayPal, ‘Not a puff piece in any way,’ & Julio Severo’s lament.” A left-wing channel laments that I did not lament the death of a neocon, but I actually lament that thousands of Christians died as a result of his warmongering.
“After all, what has Right Wing Watch against me and other conservatives? You are a well-funded left-wing Goliath, and I am just a small David in God’s hands. May God deliver you from your left-wing delusion.”
Right Wing Watch exposed, at the same time, Family Research Council, Steve Strang (of Charisma magazine), Fay Voshell (of LifeSiteNews) and Alex Jones (of InfoWars) just for expressing conservative views hated by the U.S. left.
This was not my only article blacklisted by them. Months ago, they blacklisted “Religious Exemption: How Homosexuality Is Transforming U.S. Christianity into a Ghetto.” Right Wing Watch said on June 8, 2018,
Julio Severo is less impressed by the Masterpiece Cakeshop decision: “In the 1980s, U.S. conservative evangelicals fought against sodomy. Next, against gay ‘marriage’ in the late 1990s and 2000s. Now they just fight for religious exemption. Next, will they be living in a ghetto or in jail? Is this what do they interpret as ‘victory’?”
Right Wing Watch exposed, at the same time, Linda Harvey, Lee Duigon and Kenneth Copeland Ministries just for expressing conservative views hated by the U.S. left.
On June 15, 2018, Right Wing Watch said:
Julio Severo is likewise not a fan of Pride Month: “No one is proud of a group of worshippers of anal sex celebrating homosexual sex!”
How could I be a fan of a month celebrating pride in anal sex acts considered as perversion by God in the Bible?
Right Wing Watch exposed, at the same time, Tucker Carlson, David Limbaugh and Judson Phillips just for expressing conservative views hated by the U.S. left.
Not only Right Wing Watch complained of my conservative stance against Pride Month, but the activist website LGBTQ Nation, in an article titled “Here are some of the awful things ‘loving Christians’ are saying about Pride this year,” said,
Julio Severo, writing on BarbWire, a right wing conservative website run by Matt Barber, shared similar opinions. Severo voiced his frustration with Google show their support for Pride Month on their own website.
“I was searching through Google last week when the Google page flashed before my eyes, ‘Celebrate Pride Month’ #ThisIsFamily. This propaganda was accompanied by homosexual flags,” said Severo.
The site featured three flag emoji in the small notice at the bottom of their main page, with transgender and bi pride flags alongside the classic rainbow flag.
“A whole month to celebrate… perverted homosexual sex and pervert the meaning of family for the advantage of the homosexual agenda,” states Severo. “Cannot Google dedicate a whole month for the celebration of the natural family?”
He continues, “Normal people have no pride in anal sex. They are proud of the natural family: a man, a woman and children. No one is proud of a group of worshippers of anal sex celebrating homosexual sex!”
Severo complains that Google has never mentioned Christmas or Easter, which he cites as celebrations “massively recognized by Americans.” The popular search engine doesn’t mark religious holidays — only secular ones.
To prevent Google from celebrating pride month on their website, Severo suggests the government intervene “militarily,” suggesting that troops be sent to Google headquarters to, “stop its abuses against its users and the American family.”
It is unclear if the White House has responded to Severo’s demand for an occupation of Google headquarters. But it wouldn’t be too shocking at this point in the Trump administration.
Yet, LGBTQ Nation forgot to mention it in the context I put: Neoconservatism.
It is a duty of the U.S. government to intervene against threats to its national security. Is not family such a national security issue?
Google suggested that pride in anal sex is “family.” Did the founders of America see worshippers of anal sex as “family”? Were they worshippers of homosexual depravities? Did they advocate that pride in homosexual sex represents family? So why does the U.S. government do nothing to stop this desecration of its most important national resource, family?
For lesser threats, the U.S. has militarily intervened in the affairs of other nations. Why not a military intervention in Google too?
If the U.S. can send troops to far-away nations to solve issues with no relation to the U.S. national security, why cannot the U.S. send its troops to the Google headquarters and stop its abuses against its users and the American family?
Forsaking one’s own family to meddle in the affairs of distant nations is not patriotism. It is to betray the most important values of a homeland.
Why wage stupid wars in far-away nations if the U.S. is not able to wage the most important war in its own soil and protect the integrity of family from greedy companies that have overstepped their limits?
If the U.S. government cannot intervene in Google, why intervene in far-away nations? Is oil more important than family? To protect and heavily arm the Islamic dictatorship of Saudi Arabia is more important than to protect family?
Yet, how can the U.S. government intervene in Google if its own State Department, headed by an evangelical Christian, has also declared June as the LGBTI Pride Month?
On January 4, 2018, Right Wing Watch said:
Julio Severo is very upset that Trump recognized Kwanzaa: “There is no doubt that the FBI created a very stupid Marxist creature. Why celebrate it?”
Why does Right Wing Watch want to defend Trump, who is an evangelical, in his non-conservative attitude recognizing a Marxist holiday? Specifically, why does this powerful left-wing group want to defend Trump from a Brazilian conservative evangelical? To understand why I thought Trump was wrong to celebrate a Marxist holiday, read my article: “Trump Wishes Happy… Kwanzaa, for the Sake of Politically Correct.”
Right Wing Watch exposed, at the same time, Ann Coulter and charismatic Paula White just for expressing conservative views hated by the U.S. left.
Other prominent conservative leaders frequently attacked by Right Wing Watch are: Scott Lively, Pat Robertson, Peter LaBarbera, Tony Perkins, Matt Barber, Linda Harvey, Bill Federer, Michael Savage, Joseph Farah, Jerry Falwell Jr., Jane Chastain, Erik Rush, Bryan Fischer, Michele Bachmann, James Dobson, Dinesh D’Souza, Barbara Simpson, Mat Staver, Cindy Jacobs, Lou Engle, Lance Wallnau, Rick Joyner, David Horowitz, Larry Klayman and many others.
What does Right Wing Watch, which is owned by People for the American Way, want?
According to WND, People for the American Way (PFAW) is “an atheist socialist organization which, through publications like its ‘Right Wing Watch,’ dedicates itself to the destruction of conservatives in general.”
According to its website, Right Wing Watch has a special mission to attack conservatives opposed to the gay agenda, abortion and Muslim ideology.
What do U.S. conservatives say about Right Wing Watch?
Pat Robertson, of 700 Club, said, “A nasty group.”
Peter LaBarbera, of Americans for Truth of Homosexuality, said, “They should call it People for the Homosexual Way.”
Matt Barber, the founder of BarbWire, said, “A radical secularist agenda… a socialist agenda… pushing the culture of death.”
Why has Right Wing Watch focused on my articles?
What do they intend?
In 2011, WND had reported on surveillance by the Homeland Security Department against my blog. What did they intend?
In the same year, WND reported in a headline on PayPal cutting my account after a campaign by a U.S. homosexual organization.
Why is Goliath (Right Wing Watch, Homeland Security Department, etc.) monitoring and worried about a small David?
Recommended Reading on the U.S. Left against Julio Severo:
Recommended Reading on Facebook censorship:
Another Recommended Reading:

Thursday, September 20, 2018

Facebook is building a “fake news war room” inside its headquarters to fight against conservative information during the upcoming US and Brazilian elections


Facebook is building a “fake news war room” inside its headquarters to fight against conservative information during the upcoming US and Brazilian elections

By Julio Severo
In a report titled “Facebook is building a ‘fake news war room’ inside its California headquarters to co-ordinate its battle against the spread of misinformation during the upcoming US and Brazilian elections,” DailyMail said, “Facebook officials are ramping up their efforts to stop the spread of ‘fake news.’”
It is very easy to identify what Facebook considers fake news and misinformation: conservative views.
Conservatives have been Facebook’s favorite victims for censorship.
When there is almost no one complaint from the left-wing Facebook users of censorship of their views, complaints from the conservative movement are widespread.
“Google and Twitter and Facebook, they’re really treading on very, very troubled territory and they have to be careful. It’s not fair to large portions of the population,” President Donald Trump said last month, according to Fox, noting that his administration has “literally thousands and thousands of complaints coming in” about the tech companies’ practices.
There is pro-left bias and anti-conservative bias on Facebook. Last year, for example, Facebook hired Joel Benenson, a chief adviser to Barack Obama and the chief strategist of Hillary Clinton.
What Facebook is promising now is more censorship of conservatives, especially in their free choice to use Facebook to spread their conservative ideas. Such pressure is provoking a result: 1 in 3 conservatives have left or considering leaving Facebook.
I can speak by my own experience. In the last 14 months, Facebook has imposed on my profile 30-day blocks several times. In a report about censorship, WND has included my case in its headline “‘Free speech issue of our time’: Tech giants trigger conservative revolt.”
The DailyMail report said,
The firm has revealed it will have a fully-functioning “war room” up and running at its Menlo Park Campus in time for the US and Brazil elections.
Facebook executives claim the company has several teams currently working to improve its response to any attempts designed to manipulate Facebook's content to favour any specific candidate or party.
The Brazilian general elections are scheduled to be held on October 7 to elect the President and Vice President, the National Congress, state and Federal District Governors and Vice Governors, state Legislative Assemblies and Federal District Legislative Chamber.
The United States midterm elections are due to be held on November 6 2018. It will see all 435 seats in the House of Representatives and 35 of the 100 seats in the United States Senate contested.
Facebook’s alleged worry is that its platform was used to elect Trump. I wonder if Facebook would be worried if its platform had been successful, as it tried to do, in electing the left-wing Hillary Clinton.
Facebook wants the public to believe, as William Murray said, that “a handful of ‘Russian trolls’ leaving comments on Facebook pages altered the results of the 2016 elections!”
Facebook is using the excuse of Russian trolls — Russians and their current conservatism — as scapegoats to increase its censorship of conservatives.
So Facebook kills two birds with one stone: It blames Russia for interfering in the U.S. elections and distracts attention of its own efforts to help elect left-wing candidates.
Regardless of Russian conservatism, most Facebook users are conservative. This is the only explanation for the fact that, in spite of Facebook’s massive pro-left bias, the majority’s will prevailed. Untold numbers of users have been put in the Facebook jail for just saying that homosexuality is perversion. Facebook had even removed my quotation of Leviticus 18:22, where God said, “Do not lie with a man as one lies with a woman; that is detestable.”
Most voters of Trump were evangelical, and this is the reason Facebook has imposed so much censorship on conservative evangelicals. Likewise, the main voting base of a promising right-wing candidate in Brazil is evangelicals.
Facebook’s war room is not against fake news. It is against conservative news. It is against evangelicals in the U.S. and Brazil.
Facebook’s battle is not against misinformation. It is against conservative and evangelical information.
I know by experience, because I am evangelical and I have been under censorship and 30-days blocks from Facebook.
If it could, Facebook would send all American and Brazilian evangelicals to virtual Gulags. The first step has already been taken: Relentless censorship of evangelical views of the homosexual agenda.
The left is rife with fake news and misinformation. If Facebook were serious about fighting such threats, it would impose on left-wing extremists the same censorship it has been imposing on conservatives for years.
Recommended Reading:
Recommended Reading on Facebook censorship:
Another Recommended Reading:
Recommended Reading on the U.S. Left against Julio Severo: