Thursday, April 19, 2007

The prophet Elijah’s return: what the Elijah anointing represents to families and the political world in these last days

The prophet Elijah’s return: what the Elijah anointing represents to families and the political world in these last days

Prophet Elijah was a man of God deeply involved in political activities. He was not a politician, but he admonished and rebuked politicians.
Elijah began his ministry with no fear to deliver a hard message to King Ahab (a political creature like president Lula in Brazil and like former president Clinton in the US):
“You’re the troublemaker… You and your family have disobeyed the LORD’s commands by worshiping Baal”. (1Kings 18:18)
Elijah kept confronting King Ahab subsequently through many other prophetic messages. (To see how God used Elijah in the political realm of Israel, read the chapters 17, 18, 19 and 21 of the book of 1 Kings and the chapter 1 of the book of 2 Kings, in the Old Testament.)
After fulfilling incredible prophetic missions in the politics of Israel, Elijah was taken by God (see the chapter 2 of the book of 2 Kings). Yet, he did not experience death. According to the book of the Prophet Malachi, Elijah will return. God says: “See, I will send you the prophet Elijah before that great and dreadful day of the LORD comes. He will turn the hearts of the fathers to their children, and the hearts of the children to their fathers; or else I will come and strike the land with a curse”. (Malachi 4:5-6 NIV)
However, even before Elijah’s return, a partial, unexpected fulfillment has already happened (just as other partial, unexpected fulfillments are possible to happen):
Jesus answered and said to them, “Indeed, Elijah is coming first and will restore all things. But I say to you that Elijah has come already, and they did not know him but did to him whatever they wished. Likewise the Son of Man is also about to suffer at their hands.” Then the disciples understood that He spoke to them of John the Baptist. (Matthew 17:11-13 NKJV, the italics is mine.)
When Jesus said that Elijah will restore all things, he also meant that Elijah will put everything in order — especially in the political sphere. The Philips New Testament says that Elijah will “begin the world’s reformation”. The political world, in all its corruption, hypocrisy and wickedness, needs order, and God will send Elijah for this purpose.

John the Baptist: the first man to have Elijah’s anointing?

In the life of John the Baptist, Jesus himself recognized and explained that there was a partial fulfillment for that prophecy, that is, in addition to Elijah’s return, John the Baptist was also an Elijah of God to the world. Probably, the ministry of John the Baptist also shows that God can raise men in the Elijah anointing. Receiving the Elijah anointing, John the Baptist did what Elijah did. What did Elijah do? He rebuked rulers according to the powerful Word of God.
Just as Elijah, John the Baptist led his life in a prophetic seclusion “in the wilderness”, as a best way to seek God, as a best way to for him to hear the voice of the Holy Spirit and be a powerful tool of God in the society.
Having the Elijah anointing, John the Baptist confronted Herod (other political creature like President Lula of Brazil and former President Clinton) because of a sexual sin in his life:
For John had been saying to Herod, “It is not lawful for you to have your brother’s wife”. (Mark 6:18 NIV)
Other Bible translations reveal that John made that rebuke frequently to Herod. Not only once, or twice, but whenever he saw Herod, John opened his mouth. He did not lose any opportunity to say that the king had broken God’s legal limits.
Strangely, what John was doing was the partial fulfillment of God’s promise in Malachi. Yet, no one could imagine that included in that promise was also the return of the Elijah anointing. John the Baptist may have been the first servant of the Lord to enjoy that anointing.
The prophetic mission of John the Baptist was to prepare the heart of God’s people for the greatest visitation of the Lord in the human history. Of course, spiritually, the Lord will keep visiting his people, to make great works, and servants of the Lord will help prepare the heart of God’s people for the visitations of the Holy Spirit in these last days. If the Lord keep pouring out the Elijah anointing, we will see men bold in the Holy Spirit, ready, according God’s Word, to rebuke rulers in sin and corruption.
What John the Baptist did frequently before Herod is a startling contrast with the reality of our days, where ordinary men and women who profess to be from God support politicians and rulers having a moral and sexual behavior worst than the behavior of Herod. Yet, the political involvement of John went as far as where those men and women do not dare to go. His political involvement did not flatter the powerful, but did reflect faithfully God’s perspective to deal with specific and serious moral problems.
Where the Elijah anointing goes in, goes in too the prophetic ministry before political authorities, so that their politics get aligned with God’s politics and so that politicians get morally aligned with God’s will and laws.
While Elijah in the Old Testament used to exhort the Jew rulers to lead a righteous lifestyle to please God, in the New Testament John exhorted Herod (who was not a Jew) to correct his sexual behavior. Herod had many serious problems (including dishonesty, corruption and violence) that deserved sharp rebuke. John could have confronted all of theses sins, for he had knowledge, through his parents who were from priestly families, of the important role of the Old Testament prophets in the denunciation against the corruption and oppression against the poor by government offficiais.
However, he acted according to the righteous priority God had put in his heart, perhaps because it did not much sense to press a politician to try to “fix” the things in the society when his life needed a moral “repair”. He did not waste his energy attacking all the sins of a politician. He began attacking head-on the sin his spiritual vision saw as the most critical in that point. His absolute priority was to deal directly with the moral issue, even though he did also condemn other sins in King Herod. For his attitude of rebuking the sexual sin of a man in the government, John eventually suffered prison and death.
Jesus endorsed the prophetic behavior of John. While John was in the prison because of the “crime” of condemning the sexual sin of Herod, Jesus had only kindly comments about him. “I can guarantee this truth: Of all the people ever born, no one is greater than John the Baptizer… If you are willing to accept their message, John is the Elijah who was to come.” (Matthew 11:14 GWV, emphasis is mine.)
If he lived in our days, there is no doubt that John would open his mouth before politicians like President Lula in Brazil, who actively promotes abortion and homosexuality in the society. Yet, who could say that the Elijah anointing cannot be given to men of God in Brazil? While the pouring out of this anointing is not seen, nothing keeps God’s people from crying out ceaselessly: “Lord, Brazil has in its government Herods and Ahabs, but where are your Elijah for Brazil?”

Restoring and reforming the political world

At the same time he declared John symbolized Elijah, Jesus made also clear that Elijah will really come to restore everything and begin the world’s reformation. There are many crooked, perverted and wicked things in the political leaders and in the politics and laws themselves made by them, and Elijah will come with the powerful Word of the Lord to rebuke the political world, to manifest to the haughty world rulers that God demands governments and nations to behave according to the righteousness of God’s Word.
Perhaps, as the example of John the Baptist, God will be able to raise also in these last days men to represent Elijah. After all, there are many Ahabs and Herods in the modern governments and they also need to be rebuked according the Word of the Lord. They need to know and recognize that God does not move only within the Christian churches, but also among the haughty world rulers. They need to feel, through the prophetic Elijah anointing in the servants chosen by God, that their politics and behavior are an abomination in the God’s eyes.
The Ahabs who promote the state idolatry, witchcraft, prostitution and homosexuality need to know God’s power through his prophets. The Herods who live wicked sexual behaviors need to be rebuked by the prophets having the Elijah anointing.
The world rulers have no right to do as they see fit, for God gave them the specific responsibility to serve God chastising the wicked and praising those who do good. God’s Word makes clear that governors “are sent by him for the punishment of evildoers and for the praise of those who do good.” (1 Peter 2:14 NKJV)
All human government was called to be God’s servant in this fundamental obligation:
“For [the State] is God’s minister to you for good. But if you do evil, be afraid; for he does not bear the sword in vain; for he is God’s minister, an avenger to execute wrath on him who practices evil.” (Romans 13:4 NKJV)
However, the modern State intrudes even God’s realm promising to grant everything (health care, education, etc.) to the population and meet all of their needs, as if it were God himself! Gerald Ford, US president in the 70s, said a great truth about government:
“If the government is big enough to give you everything you want, it is big enough to take away everything you have”.
When a government fails to be a minister of God in the mission God gave it to punish the wicked and praise those who do good and intrudes areas that God did not allow it (the control over children and education), then the State becomes a Monster.
The Brazilian government has been steadily failing in its responsibility to make Brazilian people safe from criminals, which is its obligation and also the duty God imposed on it. It has also been steadily failing in education and health care, which God did not entitle it. Result: the government takes away almost everything from its citizens, but it gives them almost nothing in return, and the little quantity the people receive is precarious and poor.
When the State wants to do everything, eventually it does almost no thing, except overburdening the population by a great number of high and unjust taxes. So much money for security, health care and education taxes and, at the end, citizens end up with no money and no one of the many state “promises” they were forced to pay at so high prices.
No government has God’s call to get involved in the control of families, children and promotion of politics of abortion, homosexuality and other perversions. The basic responsibility God gave the government is “to execute wrath on him who practices evil”. Everything that is beyond this obligation is state intrusion and may seriously be considered as illegality in the God’s eyes. The Elijahs of God will confront presidents, governors, mayors and other elected officials for the negligence of their obligation and will rebuke them for intruding spheres that are not proper for them.
Yet, where are the Elijahs of God to warn presidents and other governors that their government and their politics are unlawful in the God’s eyes? Where are the Elijahs of God to tell the government that its responsibility is just public security? Where are the men of God to imitate John the Baptist and say to the modern-day Herods: “What you are doing is against God’s Law”? It is very easy to come near a president or another corrupt and immoral public official and limit oneself to praise and flatter. Multitudes of religious leaders meeting high authorities do exactly so. They do not seek God’s face and when they are face to face with a governor, they have just praises, and often the governor rightly deserves rebuke and warning. There are abundant flatterers. But where are the Elijah? Where are the men with the anointed courage to tell to the presidents that their government broke the limits God gave?

The key to cultivate the Elijah anointing: the direct involvement of parents in the upbringing and education of their children

Where are the Elijah of God? They are, or they may be, in the spiritual environment proper for their development. God says:
“See, I will send you the prophet Elijah before that great and dreadful day of the LORD comes. He will turn the hearts of the fathers to their children, and the hearts of the children to their fathers; or else I will come and strike the land with a curse”. (Malachi 4:5-6 NIV, emphasis is mine.)
In our time, the State has been getting children to distance themselves from their parents, for parents are not properly committing themselves in the lives of their children. With such state-induced separation, it has been very easy for parents to turn from children and children from parents.
The State, that Elijah and John the Baptist so much rebuked, has today as one of its supreme goals to control children — through schools. The state control over children and education is a recent novelty in the human history. Of course, the State alleges to defend “the right to education” of the children. Yet, even though parents have post-graduate college education, the Brazilian State, for example, does not give to those parents the right to homeschool their children, under the pretext that it wants “the best interests of the children” — which are, in fact, just a disguise to protect its best interests.
A child learning at home may receive a good education, if her parents have the means to sacrifice themselves in that education, and the State will have a hard time to sow its new and strange values in her while her parents are near. At school, even when children do not receive a proper education — and studies show that the Brazilian education is not well —, the important thing, for the State, is that faraway from their parents at least it is easier to put children in touch with different values from the values from their parents, values approved by the state criterions. The state god demands the sacrifice of children in the altar of the government indoctrination.
What is in stake is the life direction and values of the children. The State knows very well that the control over education and children is fundamental. So the government does not give up its own law that requires children to attend institutional school. The aim per se is not education. It is to distance a child from her home and keep her in the institutional environment — faraway from her family and their values — the most time possible. The result? After some years exposed to the state indoctrination, many teenagers from Christian families begin to fall away. When they finish a college, the majority get detached from God and his values or from family and their values. They end up “educated” and immoral, “educated” and rebel, “educated” and faraway from God, “educated” and faraway from the family values.
“Educated” is an expression virtually empty of its real meaning, for most schoolchildren who finish school today are functionally illiterate, writing and reading poorly, but very “educated” in completely unnecessary issues, as dating with birth control, abortion and free sex and pornographic sex education with a right to homosexual immorality.
The fact is that children are turning away from parents and their values, for their parents delivered them to the harmful influence of the state indoctrination of the institutional schools.
What is the advantage in a great “education” when the cost is the life and spiritual values of our children? Probably, the apostles of the Lord Jesus Christ would quickly sacrifice such academic opportunities, instead of sacrificing their children for the sake of this kind of education. They would never see education as more important than the life and spiritual values of their children.
If the apostles had just those two options, of course they would choose to protect their children. Yet, there are not only those two options. Where education is concerned, the institutional school is not the only choice! When the heart of the parents turns to their children, taking on the direct supervision of their education and upbringing and refusing to turn them over to the state Monster, the heart of the children turns — not to drugs, rebellion and wicked behaviors. Their heart turns to their parents. It is no coincidence that in the homeschooling movement most children admire and respect their parents, a behavior increasingly difficult when their children have already been attending an institutional school for some years. Education is the key. The State knows it. God’s Word teaches it. It is up for parents now to discover that important truth.
He who has control over the education of a child will have decisive influence over her values. That is why the State demands that control, even when parents have a great education. The State needs to control the education, so that it may have total freedom to preach and teach its “democratical” values — that are not anything more than its “gospel” of humanism, socialism, feminism, homosexualism and liberalism. The State needs to control the children, so that it may have total freedom to turn them into disciples of that “gospel”.
The state Monster uses the educational system to create small and big monsters according to its own image and likeness, so that they may learn from the state masters that what is an abomination in God’s eyes is normal for the state Monster, and that what is just and right in God’s eyes is abomination for the state Monster. There are abundant examples of that reality. The state Monster in Brazil sees as abomination the instruction of Proverbs giving parents the right and full freedom to discipline, through a rod of correction, the wicked behavior of their children. But it sees as normal and just to deliver, in adoption, children to gay couples.
The Brazil Without Homophobia campaign of the Lula government wants all Brazilians to respect sodomy. Parents not respecting sodomy run the risk of losing the custody over their children — which may be granted to a homosexual “couple”. Only a Monster could behave this way. And such Monster is real: it is the State.
The state Monster sees as normal to deliver unborn babies to the extermination of the legal abortion. For it, it is normal to teach schoolchildren that homosexuality and sex without marriage are life options and deserve respect.
The state Monster requires, in the religious classes in the public schools, Jesus Christ to be put in the same level of the gods of Candomble and other pagan and Afro-Brazilian religions.
The state Monster requires the exclusion of God and his values from schools and the social realm, under the pretext that the State is secular. The exclusion is willful, so that the place of God may be occupied by the state Monster. So, the modern State is like the old kingdoms, where paganism usurped the place that belonges to God. Today the usurper is humanism, statism, secularism, socialism and other similar ideologies.
Even with so a strong control and with draconian policies and laws governing education, the Lula government, after several years investing in the “improvement” of education, recognizes that its “objective failed” and that in the Brazilian education the “picture is negative”. In fact, it also recognizes that, even though institutional education is compulsory and homeschooling is banned, illiteracy is relatively high and that children finish fundamental education virtually unable to read and understand what they read. In other words, the government itself is saying that its education is a disaster!
In spite of that much-recognized failure, the Lula government was able to lower the compulsory school age, changing the law so that parents may be forced now to send their children to the state indoctrination of the institutional school no more at the 7-year age, but at 6. Yet, the state goal is much more ambitious:
“Information by the National Campaign for the Right to Education reveal preoccupying figures… More than 50% of the children between 0 and 6 years are not at school…”[1]
That information indicates a scary reality: in spite of the state failure in its education for children above 6 years who are forced by law to attend an institutional school, now the State worries that, below 6 years, only 50% children attend schools. The solution? Make school attendance below 6 years old compulsory too! The State is considering legal and political measures to extend its control over those little children.
The government is not happy with its performance in the illiteracy of the Brazilian children, but it is satisfied that its own laws keep children more under its own control and supervision than under the control and supervision of parents. What can then the government do when children are faraway from the direct supervision of their parents?
The Lula government has confessed its failure to educate schoolchildren in a minimally satisfactory way, but it wants to guarantee that they may have access to condoms and pornographic books at schools. The Brazilian State wants to make up for its educational failure through condoms and pornography. So schoolchildren will not worry about their low grades, for they will be intoxicated by free sex and a self-esteem induced by psychological techniques of brainwashing. They will become happy morons.
Parents who desire to invest themselves in their children for the sake of Jesus, upbringing children having their heart turned to their parents, will need the Elijah anointing, so that they may challenge the immoral state impositions requiring control over children in the education. In fact, the Superior Tribunal of Justice, perceiving the “threat” of homeschooling to the state ambitions, affirmed that “children do not belong to their parents”, in a judicial decision against a homeschool family in Brazil. The modern State, as the old pagan kingdoms, demands child sacrifices in its altars, and all effort by the Christian parents to rescue their children from that secularist and pagan sacrifice requires the Elijah anointing, requires the parental sacrifice in the lives of their children, taking on their education and the supervision and formation of their values.
The Elijah anointing is for these last days. It is for parents — to enable them to face the state absolutism. It is for parents — to enable them to dedicate themselves to the total education of their children. It is for parents — to give them courage not to deliver their children in the educational altar of the state Monster. It is for parents — to enable them to raise up prophetic children, in the anointing of Elijah and John the Baptist.
Elijah (and his last-days prophetic anointing) will convince parents to take on completely the upbringing and education of their children and the children to respect and admire their parents. That purpose has already been fulfilling itself in a startling way in the homeschooling movement, where parents turn to their children and children turn to their parents.

The homeschooling movement offers excellent opportunities to raise men and women in the anointing of Elijah and John the Baptist

Elijah (and his last-days prophetic anointing) will convince parents to reject the unfair state impositions in the sphere of upbringing and education of children. This anointing will challenge governments and politicians. It will be anointing to shake what needs for so a long time to be shaken. Before the determined state opposition to homeschooling, it is impossible for parents to get involved in that prophetic movement without challenging the corrupt, pagan and immoral State.
Yet, the cost is worthwhile. There is no greater blessing, for a family, than to have their children at the Lord Jesus’ feet, not under the paws of the state Monster and its immoral values. In order that such blessing may be a reality, God’s people, as Elijah did, will have to confront governments and authorities.
The fundamental characteristic of the prophetic lifestyle of Elijah, which will be active in the last days, is the prophetic isolation. Elijah lived completely isolated from the social sins. Surely, if there were public (state) schools in Israel in his time and if he had a family, he would not send his children to school. He would take on their education, in the Lord. That necessary isolation is part of homeschooling, where Christian children receive a good education, without the state indoctrination and without the pressures and influence of classmates who have morally problematic behaviors.
In his isolation, Elijah always sought God and got prepared to attend whenever God called him to go to society and confront its political leaders and wicked values. In homeschooling, committed parents have the opportunity to invest deeply in the spiritual, moral e educational formation of their children, preparing them to attend to God’s call in the social sphere, combating harmful values. Like Elijah, the homeschooling movement offers excellent opportunities for the parents to raise and educate children who will challenge the modern secularist, pagan, abortist, homosexualist and immoral political system.
While the aim of the Lord in the education is for parents to form their children in the Elijah anointing in these last days, the aim of the state Monster is to form the new generation in the ethical, sexual and spiritual anormality of Ahab and Herod.
Brazil and the world need Elijah’s return and many other men like him and John the Baptist.
We do not know how or when Elijah will come, but Elijah or the men having the Elijah anointing who will come will do a prophetic work of restoration in the governments, shaking the structures of sin and arrogance. Those men will have a life preparation as the life preparation Elijah and John the Baptist had.
It is much a possibility that God may have chosen the homeschooling movement to give parents the opportunity to raise children in the Elijah anointing. Those children, raised and educated isolatedly from the state indoctrination, will be strengthened in Bible values which will enable them to be God’s instruments to rebuke futurely political leaders, their immoral behaviors and their unfair policies.
Homeschooling, where parents turn to their children and children turn to their parents, is the proper soil for the “cultivation” of new Elijahs. Only this way it will be possible to escape from the curse that will occur as punishment to our nation because of the separation between parents and their children and children and their parents and because of the perverted policies of the state Monster that provoke and facilitate that separation. (See Malachi 4:6)
The opportunities of blessings are many in the homeschooling movement, but the parents who want the Elijah anointing for their children will need to pay a high cost because of the violent threats of Ahabs, Herods, Lulas and other menials of the state Monster. They demand complete control over the education of our children, a control God did not give them authority or permission to require.
In the past, the state Monster used to demand child sacrifices. That requirement has not changed. The state Monster is still thirsty for children.
Whom then we will deliver our children to? Which altar will we offer them in?
Whether by homeschooling or other Holy Spirit movements, the God who acted through Elijah is going to show to the world that he has not stopped his activities in the political world. He is going to show that he has not stopped confronting politicians in their immorality and injustice.
The best from God is still about to come.
Elijah shall come.
Other important article by Julio Severo on prophetic homeschooling in these last days: The Mark of the Beast: The Tomorrow’s Education.
Source: Last Days Watchman

Thursday, March 22, 2007

The criminalization of homophobia in Brazil and the Christian churches

Dear Friends

I make available to you the complete text of the anti-homophobia bill in Brazil. It was approved in the Chamber of Deputies, through many pressure efforts, including from the International Gay and Lesbian Human Rights Commission (http://www.iglhrc.org/site/iglhrc/section.php?id=5&detail=638). To go in effect, it needs now to be approved by the Federal Senate.

I make also available to you the corrected article “The criminalization of homophobia in Brazil and the Christian churches” by Dr. Zenóbio Fonseca. Brazil is under serious threat, for this anti-homophobia law may be approved in the Brazilian Congress at any moment. To understand how Brazil has reached this point, please read the article “Behind the homosexual tsunami in Brazil” (http://lastdayswatchman.blogspot.com/2007/01/behind-homosexual-tsunami-in-brazil.html ), written by me and published originally in The Religion & Society Report, by The Howard Center for Family, Religion & Society.

The complete text of the anti-homophobia law in Brazil, translated by me, is below the article by Dr. Fonseca.

Julio Severo

*****************************************************

The criminalization of homophobia in Brazil and the Christian churches

By Dr. Zenóbio Fonseca

Rio de Janeiro, March 19, 2007 - This article seeks to offer a short presentation on the new legislation involving sexual orientation, and its repercussions on the Christian religious organizations. That new legal variation will be introduced in the Brazilian laws, through the approval of the Bill 5003/2001 by the Chamber of Deputies (House of Representatives) on November 23, 2006.

This bill changes the federal Law 7.716/89, which addresses crimes of prejudice based on race or skin color, as well as the Brazilian Penal Code (Law 2.848/1940) and the Consolidation of Labor Laws (Law 5.4252/1943), introducing new penal dispositions toward discrimination or prejudice of gender, sex, sexual orientation and gender identity.

We see that this parliamentarian proposal, currently under consideration in the Federal Senate under the Bill 122/2006, has been the primary goal of the entire homosexual movement in Brazil and other countries sympathetic to this issue, as the media has extensively shown, for it makes prejudice based on gender, sex, sexual orientation and gender identity a crime. [1].

The critical point is that this is a new law addressing the issue of discrimination based on sexual orientation.

Why should Christians in Brazil be worried? Christians are against exclusion--Christianity taught by Scriptures shows we should pursue love as our goal and be committed to biblical values.

Theoretically, it can be affirmed that the “conflict” will happen between the regulations introduced in Bill 5003/2001 and the Christian values that the Bible defends. In a special way, the “conflict” will hit Christian people and Christian religious organizations. In other words, it will hit any individual or group--including churches--that doesn’t accept homosexual behavior or sexual orientation as an acceptable practice or social pattern in any public or private place.

For example, we quote articles 8º-A and 8º-B proposed by the bill, which would penalize any attempt to restrict homosexual expression:

“Article 8-A: To hinder or restrict the expression and the manifestation of affection in public or private places open to all people, because of characteristics foreseen in the 1st article of this Law: Penalty: between 2 (two) and 5 (five) years of incarceration”.

“Article 8-B: To forbid the free expression and manifestation of affection of a homosexual, bisexual or transgender citizen, when these expressions and manifestations are allowed to other citizens: Penalty: between 2 (two) and 5 (five) years of incarceration”.

The Bill, that may go into effect at any moment in 2007, will bring serious juridical conflicts to the Christian religious organizations, their leaders and members in Brazil, because the commandments and principles that the Bible defends are contrary to the values, teachings and indoctrination of the sexual orientation ideology. Sexual orientation is just one of the many terms employed to designate and protect homosexuality.

Some Brazilians claim that, if approved, the bill will in no way affect, directly or indirectly, evangelical churches (or, in the Brazilian juridical expression, religious entities), under the allegation that the Brazilian Constitution guarantees the freedom of faith, religion and worship [2]. However, the Constitution mentions protection in the form of Law.

Here is the greatest doubt: the Constitution mentions protection to the religious temples in the form of Law. However, on the other hand, Bill 5003/2001 brings in its essence that sexual orientation is an universal and human principle, supported by the same Constitution. In other words, the issue involves the principle of the dignity of the human person [3].

This is so true that, when addressing the subject, some Brazilian courts have already been basing their decisions under that new view, that is, they have been addressing the subject as a principle of human dignity and equality.

One cannot forget that there are amendment bills to the Constitution under consideration in several States and the Chamber of Deputies, introducing the term sexual orientation as a principle expressed in the constitutional chapter of the fundamental principles. [4]

The pro-homosexuality stand of the Brazilian government is not a new development--in 2003 Brazilian diplomats introduced a similar resolution to the UN Human Rights Committee. The resolution was defeated by the opposition of Muslim countries[5].

As well, Brazil is the author of a new resolution[6], now in the Organization of the American States, where it has introduced sexual orientation as an universal principle of the dignity of the human person, forcing all of the members to accept that value under the resolution. If approved, it will have the force of domestic law in the signatory countries.

In that sense, we view with great concern the approval of the bill, as it makes no exception whatsoever for the Christian doctrines, liturgies and values that are contrary to sexual orientation and homosexuality.

For us to understand the subject and the legal and religious consequences, we use a simple argumentative example: an ordinary citizen has enrolled his son in a public school or day care, where he is taught about free sexual choice, sexual orientation[7], marriage and adoption by same-sex people. As well, the child is exposed to the current trend that teaches homosexual behavior is something that is an inborn human characteristic. At that point, the Christian father or mother, when informed that such values are obligatorily taught in his/her son’s school, takes a stand against those teachings, because of his/her biblical values. The school director, a teacher or Guardianship Council (Children Protection Services) may denounce the parents for discrimination based on sexual orientation, with a penalty of up to 5 years in prison.

Here we have the main point of reach and reflexes of the law, for who is the church and the body of Christ? They are the members, the people that profess faith in Christ Jesus.

In fact, if the church (material temple) is not hit in a direct way in its liturgy, church members will be affected when, in living and defending Christian values, the daily practice of their faith conflicts with homosexuality.

That is the worst threat of the bill, because it will hit any Christian expressing a view contrary to the free expression of the sexual orientation ideology and its values, that have been institutionalized as government programs[8] in the politics favorable to the GLBT population [9], in the federal program Brazil Without Homophobia[10], through the Ministry of the Culture, Education, Health and National Secretary of Human Rights.

Such facts here mentioned are not new in countries where similar laws are already in place, where Christians and churches are beginning to suffer the serious impact of those laws on their freedom of expression and faith, in confrontation with homosexuality.

In England, British Prime Minister Tony Blair affirmed that churches will have to accept laws against discrimination for sexual orientation, same-sex marriage and adoption by homosexual “couples”. [11]

In the American State of New Jersey, mayors and judges were alerted about the possibility that they might be prosecuted if they refused to apply pro-homosexuality anti-discrimination laws, under fines of $10,000 dollars[12].

In Pennsylvania, two grandmothers, one 75 years old and another 70 years old, together with nine other evangelicals, were arrested for speaking about Jesus in a public sidewalk. The basis for their arrest was a law against hate and discrimination. Local ministers are looking for insurance for protecting themselves from prosecution[13].

We can see that in countries where they exist, anti-discrimination laws have, after implementation, become more rigid and broad.

It is important to present this short world panorama to help remind Christians of what may happen in Brazil, if Bill 5003/2001 gets approved.

It is worthwhile to mention that the Brazilian juridical system has several prosecutional and constitutional apparatuses in place that protect human rights, through habeas corpus, individual or collective court injunctions, public civil actions and individual actions seeking restitution for moral damages to people that feel that they were disrespected in their individual rights.

In that way, the approval of this bill to guarantee and enforce the rights of the sexual minorities would be illogical, because of the juridical means that already exist in Brazil.

Zenóbio Fonseca, M.Sc., Juridical Consultant and college professor.

Email: zenobiofonseca@gmail.com

Translated by Julio Severo:

http://www.lastdayswatchman.blogspot.com

juliosevero@gmail.com

Notes:

[1] Article 2 of Bill 5003/2001: “Defines crimes of discrimination or prejudice based on race, color, ethnicity, religion, national origin, gender, sex, sexual orientation and gender identity”. (NR)

[2] Article 5, clause VI of CRFB: “The freedom of conscience and of faith is inviolable, being assured the free exercise of the religious services, and is guaranteed, in the form of Law, the protection to the worship places and their liturgies”.

[3] Article 1, clause III of CRFB: “the dignity of human person”.

[4] The National Pro-Life and Pro-Family Association website presents a list of several bills under consideration in this issue: http://www.providafamilia.org/novosite/index.htm

[5] Source: http://www.midiaindependente.org/pt/blue/2004/02/274038.shtml. Accessed in February 4, 2007.

[6] Source: http://www.adital.com.br/site/noticia.asp?lang=PT&cod=20657. Accessed in February 4, 2007.

[7] Bibliographical references of monographs on the sexual orientation issue from INEP. Website:http://www.inep.gov.br/PESQUISA/BBE-ONLINE/lista.asp?navegacao=proxima&Doc=M&cod=37341&Assunto=EDUCA%C3%83%C6%92%C3%86%E2%80%99%C3%83%C2%A2%C3%A2%E2%80%9A%C2%AC%C3%82%C2%A1%C3%83%C6%92%C3%86%E2%80%99%C3%83%E2%80%A0%C3%A2%E2%82%AC%E2%84%A2O+SEXUAL&P=1&nl=20. Accessed in February 4, 2007.

[8] Source: http://www.pt.org.br/site/noticias/noticias_int.asp?cod=45269 . Accessed in February 4, 2007.

[9] Source: http://www.planalto.gov.br/seppir/clipping/set2006/MixBrasil_1809.pdf . Accessed in February 4, 2007.

[10] Source: http://www.mj.gov.br/sedh/documentos/004_1_3.pdf. Accessed in February 4, 2007.

[11] Source: http://gonline.uol.com.br/site/arquivos/estatico/gnews/gnews_noticia_19122.htm and http://gonline.uol.com.br/site/arquivos/estatico/gnews/gnews_noticia_19094.htm. Accessed in February 4, 2007.

[12] Source: http://gonline.uol.com.br/site/arquivos/estatico/gnews/gnews_noticia_19031.htm. Accessed in February 4, 2007.

[13] Source: WND. Translated and adapted by Julio Severo: www.juliosevero.com.br

*****************************************************

FINAL COMPOSITION

BILL 5.003-B, of 2001

It alters Law 7.716, of January 5, 1989, which defines crimes provoked by prejudice of race or skin color, gives new composition to § 3 of the article 140 of the Law 2.848, of December 7, 1940 — Penal Code, and to the article 5 of the Consolidation of the Labor Laws, approved by the Law 5.452, of May 1, 1943, and takes other measures.

NATIONAL CONGRESS ordains:

Article 1: This Law alters Law 7.716, of January 5, 1989, Law 2.848, of December 7, 1940 — Penal Code, and the Consolidation of the Labor Laws, approved by the Law 5.452, of May 1, 1943, defining crimes provoked by discrimination or prejudice of gender, sex, sexual orientation and gender identity.

Article 2: The amendment to the Law 7.716, of January 5, 1989, is now put in force with the following wording:

“It defines crimes provoked by discrimination or prejudice of race, skin color, ethnicity, religion, national origin, gender, sex, sexual orientation and gender identity”. (NR)

Article 3: The caput of the article 1 of the Law 7.716, of January 5, 1989, is put now in force with the following wording:

“Article 1: Crimes provoked by discrimination or prejudice of race, skin color, ethnicity, religion, national origin, gender, sex, sexual orientation and gender identity will be punished, in the form of this Law”. (NR)

Article 4: Law 7.716, of January 5, 1989, is now put in force with of the addition of the following article 4-A:

“Article 4 — Direct or indirect actions of dismissal by an employer or his representative: Penalty: between 2 (two) and 5 (five) years of incarceration”.

Article 5: Articles 5, 6 and 7 of the Law 7.716, of January 5, 1989, are now put in force with the following wording:

“Article 5: To hinder, refuse or prohibit the entrance or permanence in any public or private setting or establishment, open to the public: Penalty: between 1 (one) and 3 (three) years of incarceration”. (NR)

“Article 6: To Refuse, deny, hinder, ignore, impair, defer or exclude, in any system of educational selection, enrollment or professional promotion: Penalty: between 3 (three) and 5 (five) years of incarceration. Sole paragraph. (Revoked)” (NR)

Article 7: To overtax, refuse, ignore or hinder the lodging in hotels, motels, boarding houses or similar places: Penalty: between 3 (three) and 5 (five) years of incarceration”. (NR)

Article 6: Law 7.716, of January 5, 1989, is now put in force with the addition of the following article 7-A:

“Article 7: To overtax, refuse, ignore or hinder the rent, purchase, acquisition, leasing or loan of real state or equipment of any purpose: Penalty: between 2 (two) and 5 (five) years of incarceration”.

Article 7: Law 7.716, of January 5, 1989, is now put in force with the addition of the following articles 8-A and 8-B:

“Article 8-A: To hinder or restrict the expression and manifestation of affection in public or private places open to all people, because of characteristics foreseen in the 1st article of this Law: Penalty: between 2 (two) and 5 (five) years of incarceration”.

“Article 8-B: To forbid the free expression and manifestation of affection of a homosexual, bisexual or transgender citizen, when these expressions and manifestations are allowed to other citizens: Penalty: between 2 (two) and 5 (five) years of incarceration”.

Article 8: Articles 16 and 20 of the Law 7.716, of January 5, 1989, are now put in force with the following wording:

“Article 16. Consequences to violators:

I — The loss of the public position or job, for federal employees;

II — Disqualification for contracts with agencies directly or indirectly associated to the federal government;

III — No access to credits granted by the government and its financial institutions or to development programs instituted or maintained by them;

IV — No exemption, suspension, amnesty or any benefits in taxes;

V — Fines of up to 10.000 (ten thousand) UFIRs, which can be multiplied up to 10 (ten) times in case of recidivism, being taken into account the offender’s financial capacity;

VI — Suspension of the operation of the establishments for a period up to 3 (three) months.

§ 1 Resources coming from the fines established by this Law will be destined to educational efforts against discrimination.

§ 2 When the illicit action is practiced by those having contract, concession and permission from the government, besides the individual responsibilities, the penalty of rescission of the contract, agreement or permission will be added.

§ 3 In any case, the period for disqualification will be 12 (twelve) months, counted from the date of the application of the sanction.

§ 4 The cadastral information and the references invoked as justifying a discrimination will be always accessible to all those that are subject to selective process, where their participation is concerned”. (NR)

“Art. 20. To practice, induce or incite discrimination or prejudice of race, skin color, ethnicity, religion, national origin, gender, sex, sexual orientation and gender identity:

§ 5 What is determined in this article involves the practice of any kind of violent, constraining, threatening or humiliating action, of moral, ethical, philosophical or psychological order”. (NR)

Article 9: Law 7.716, of January 5, 1989, is now put in force with the addition of the following articles 20-A and 20-B:

“Article 20-A. The practice of the discriminatory actions referred to in this Law will be investigated in an administrative and penal process, which will be initiated by:

I — complaint by an offended individual;

II – formal notification by a competent authority;

III – notification by non-government organizations of defense of citizenship and human rights”.

“Art. 20-B. The interpretation of the determinations of this Law and of all of the normative means for protection of the rights of equality of opportunity and treatment will meet the principle of the widest protection of the human rights.

§ 1 In that intention, compliance is to be given not only to the principles and rights foreseen in this Law, but also to all of the determinations of international treaties or conventions which Brazil is signatory of, to the national legislation and administrative determinations.

§ 2 For interpretation and application of this Law, compliance is to be given, whenever is more favorable to the antidiscrimination fight, to the guidelines made by the International Courts of Human Rights, properly recognized by Brazil”.

Article 10. § 3 of the article 140 of the Law 2.848, of December 7, 1940 — Penal code, is now put in force with the following wording:

“Article 140.

§ 3 If an offense concerns the use of elements referring to race, skin color, ethnicity, religion, national origin, gender, sex, sexual orientation and gender identity, or old age or deficiency of an individual: Penalty: between 1 (one) and 3 (three) years of incarceration and fine”. (NR)

Article 11. Article 5 of the Consolidation of the Labor Laws — CLL, approved by the Law 5.452, of May 1, 1943, is now put in force added of the following only paragraph:

“Article 5

Sole paragraph. It is forbidden any discriminatory and limiting practice regarding to access to a job, or its maintenance, because of sex, sexual orientation and gender identity, origin, race, skin color, marital status, family situation or age. The only exception is the hypotheses of protection to minors foreseen in the clause XXXIII of the caput of the article 7 of the Federal Constitution”. (NR)

Art. 12. This Law goes into effect in the date of its publication.

Session Hall, November 23, 2006.

Relator

English version: Julio Severo

http://www.lastdayswatchman.blogspot.com