Saturday, February 28, 2015

Murder, Intrigues, Confusions, CIA, Sodomy, Putin

Murder, Intrigues, Confusions, CIA, Sodomy, Putin

By Julio Severo
When the mass media side with homosexual activists against Christians, the public disagrees.
When the mass media side with Obama against the American people, the public disagrees.
When the mass media side with an anti-Putin version in a case involving a Putin opponent “mysteriously” murdered, does the public agree?
According to Paul Craig Roberts, who was a Reagan official, the “mysterious” murder of a Putin opponent was a destabilizing plot by CIA in the spirit of Obama hostilities against Russia.
And according to Dr. Scott Lively, the most prominent authority on the evils of gay agenda, in the early 1990s Bill Clinton struck down a ban on homosexuals working at CIA and other intelligence agencies.
By Clinton courtesy, for more than two decades homosexuals have increasingly been there: CIA, FBI, NSA, etc.
Dr. Lively makes it clear that wherever they are, homosexual activists produce intrigues, confusions and havoc, always using their occupations for their greater cause and always for its opponents’ disadvantage. And homosexuals occupying posts in the greatest intelligence agency in the world are capable of provoking the biggest damages in the world against those not aligning themselves with their agenda.
Weeks ago, the most prominent homosexual magazine in the U.S. named Putin as an enemy number 1 of the homosexual movement. This did not go unnoticed by homosexuals in the intelligence agencies. In fact, it has not gone unnoticed even by the mainstream media, habitually pro-Obama and pro-sodomy, by insistently against the Russian president.
This is the cost for the president of a great nation today to pass laws to protect children and teens from the obvious evils of homosexual propaganda.
A common citizen opposing the aggressive gay agenda is victim of patently malicious set-ups, slanders, intrigues and threats. Would a president suffer less?
Homosexual activists are ruthless, lying and relentless to common citizens who do not accept their tyrannical agenda. Would they be less ruthless to a president?
Recommended Reading:


DesertRhino said...

The facts here do not indicate in any way that US intelligence did this. I think it is most likely that some mob types did it. That’s the money bet there.
But I wouldn’t discount this theory 100%. And bear in mind, it wouldn’t need to be a CIA agent. The agency could have told the right mobsters that he told them “X”,, knowing what the outcome would soon be. Then sit back and watch the fireworks.

But one essential truth that this article touches on, is the idea that the beginning of the breakdown in US/Russo relations began with Obamas push for homosexuality in Russia.

Julio Severo said...

An intelligence operation ALWAYS leaves a track of fog and confusion. Nothing will ever pinpoint: this was a CIA, this was KGB...

DesertRhino said...

I just realize that we can never know who pulled the trigger, and that every explanation is compromised by very strong interests from someone...somewhere.

But I always remember things were going pretty well overall between us and the Ruskis until Obama had his embassy start flying the rainbow flag, start pushing for homosexual rights, started questioning how gays will be treated at the Olympics, started advocating for Pussy Riot desecrating a beloved church, etc etc. Remember that ST Petersburg G20 where Obama was thinking of not going on behalf of faggotry?

I think there is some personal bad blood between Obama and Putin. Obama is the homo who wont shut up. and Putin doesn’t like homos very much. SO much of the problem comes from Obamas homosexuality.